Get Timber


Browse and export resistance outcomes in CEDAR. Learn more about the structure of CEDAR and each of these fields in the CEDAR ontology.

This table - and the exported CSV - are formatted as 'timber'; the format used in the iAM.AMR project. You can select multiple items (and de-select items) from each list by CTRL (mac?) clicking.


id_res_out pid_res_out id_reference pid_reference ref_rwid ref_doi ref_pmid ref_bibtex_key ref_title country study_design id_factor pid_factor factor_title factor_description factor_group comparator_group host_level_01 host_level_02 host_production_stream host_life_stage stage_allocate stage_observe moa_type moa_unit resistance_class resistance resistance_gene microbe_level_01 microbe_level_02 is_figure_extract figure_extract_method figure_extract_reproducible contable_a contable_b contable_c contable_d prevtable_a prevtable_b prevtable_c prevtable_d table_n_exp table_n_ref odds_ratio odds_ratio_lo odds_ratio_up odds_ratio_sig odds_ratio_confidence
10015 10015 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Fourth-generation cephalosporins cefpirome None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 43.00 None 10.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10016 10016 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10095 10095 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed (sample at grower period) Tiamulin and amoxicillin use (sample at grower period) No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Fourth-generation cephalosporins cefpirome None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 40.00 None 16.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10017 10017 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 40.00 None 16.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10018 10018 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 47.00 None 16.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10020 10020 10051 None 11568 10.4315/0362-028x-72.2.267 Mathew2009 Effects of in-feed egg yolk antibodies on salmonella shedding, bacterial antibiotic resistance, and health of pigs United States of America Experimental 10142 10142 Apramycin and carbadox use Basal diet plus apramycin at 150 g/ton of feed for 14 days followed by carbadox at 25 g/ton until pigs reached 35 kg Apramycin and carbadox use Control treatment group (basal diet) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Other Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 67.80 None 70.10 None None None None None None None None
10021 10021 10051 None 11568 10.4315/0362-028x-72.2.267 Mathew2009 Effects of in-feed egg yolk antibodies on salmonella shedding, bacterial antibiotic resistance, and health of pigs United States of America Experimental 10143 10143 Oxytetracycline use Basal diet plus oxytetracycline at 100 g/ton until pigs reached 35 kg Oxytetracycline use Control treatment group (basal diet) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Other Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 88.80 None 70.10 None None None None None None None None
10022 10022 10051 None 11568 10.4315/0362-028x-72.2.267 Mathew2009 Effects of in-feed egg yolk antibodies on salmonella shedding, bacterial antibiotic resistance, and health of pigs United States of America Experimental 10141 10141 Anti-Salmonella egg yolk powder use Basal diet plus egg yolk powder derived from chickens challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium antigens; powder fed at 6 kg/ton for 14 days Anti-Salmonella egg yolk powder use Egg yolk control (Basal diet plus commercial food grade egg yolk powder fed at 6 kg/ton for 14 days) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Other Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 56.90 None 75.20 None None None None None None None None
10024 10024 10051 None 11568 10.4315/0362-028x-72.2.267 Mathew2009 Effects of in-feed egg yolk antibodies on salmonella shedding, bacterial antibiotic resistance, and health of pigs United States of America Experimental 10144 10144 Spray-dried porcine plasma use Basal diet plus spray-dried porcine plasma fed at 3% of feed for 14 days Spray-dried porcine plasma use Control treatment group (basal diet) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Other Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 64.60 None 70.10 None None None None None None None None
10025 10025 10051 None 11568 10.4315/0362-028x-72.2.267 Mathew2009 Effects of in-feed egg yolk antibodies on salmonella shedding, bacterial antibiotic resistance, and health of pigs United States of America Experimental 10142 10142 Apramycin and carbadox use Basal diet plus apramycin at 150 g/ton of feed for 14 days followed by carbadox at 25 g/ton until pigs reached 35 kg Apramycin and carbadox use Control treatment group (basal diet) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Other Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 46.30 None 2.30 None None None None None None None None
10026 10026 10051 None 11568 10.4315/0362-028x-72.2.267 Mathew2009 Effects of in-feed egg yolk antibodies on salmonella shedding, bacterial antibiotic resistance, and health of pigs United States of America Experimental 10143 10143 Oxytetracycline use Basal diet plus oxytetracycline at 100 g/ton until pigs reached 35 kg Oxytetracycline use Control treatment group (basal diet) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Other Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.10 None 2.30 None None None None None None None None
10027 10027 10051 None 11568 10.4315/0362-028x-72.2.267 Mathew2009 Effects of in-feed egg yolk antibodies on salmonella shedding, bacterial antibiotic resistance, and health of pigs United States of America Experimental 10141 10141 Anti-Salmonella egg yolk powder use Basal diet plus egg yolk powder derived from chickens challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium antigens; powder fed at 6 kg/ton for 14 days Anti-Salmonella egg yolk powder use Egg yolk control (Basal diet plus commercial food grade egg yolk powder fed at 6 kg/ton for 14 days) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Other Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.50 None 4.20 None None None None None None None None
10028 10028 10051 None 11568 10.4315/0362-028x-72.2.267 Mathew2009 Effects of in-feed egg yolk antibodies on salmonella shedding, bacterial antibiotic resistance, and health of pigs United States of America Experimental 10144 10144 Spray-dried porcine plasma use Basal diet plus spray-dried porcine plasma fed at 3% of feed for 14 days Spray-dried porcine plasma use Control treatment group (basal diet) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Other Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.00 None 2.30 None None None None None None None None
10029 10029 10051 None 11568 10.4315/0362-028x-72.2.267 Mathew2009 Effects of in-feed egg yolk antibodies on salmonella shedding, bacterial antibiotic resistance, and health of pigs United States of America Experimental 10142 10142 Apramycin and carbadox use Basal diet plus apramycin at 150 g/ton of feed for 14 days followed by carbadox at 25 g/ton until pigs reached 35 kg Apramycin and carbadox use Control treatment group (basal diet) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.30 None 0.00 None None None None None None None None
10030 10030 10051 None 11568 10.4315/0362-028x-72.2.267 Mathew2009 Effects of in-feed egg yolk antibodies on salmonella shedding, bacterial antibiotic resistance, and health of pigs United States of America Experimental 10143 10143 Oxytetracycline use Basal diet plus oxytetracycline at 100 g/ton until pigs reached 35 kg Oxytetracycline use Control treatment group (basal diet) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.00 None 0.00 None None None None None None None None
10031 10031 10051 None 11568 10.4315/0362-028x-72.2.267 Mathew2009 Effects of in-feed egg yolk antibodies on salmonella shedding, bacterial antibiotic resistance, and health of pigs United States of America Experimental 10141 10141 Anti-Salmonella egg yolk powder use Basal diet plus egg yolk powder derived from chickens challenged with Salmonella Typhimurium antigens; powder fed at 6 kg/ton for 14 days Anti-Salmonella egg yolk powder use Egg yolk control (Basal diet plus commercial food grade egg yolk powder fed at 6 kg/ton for 14 days) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.50 None 0.80 None None None None None None None None
10032 10032 10051 None 11568 10.4315/0362-028x-72.2.267 Mathew2009 Effects of in-feed egg yolk antibodies on salmonella shedding, bacterial antibiotic resistance, and health of pigs United States of America Experimental 10144 10144 Spray-dried porcine plasma use Basal diet plus spray-dried porcine plasma fed at 3% of feed for 14 days Spray-dried porcine plasma use Control treatment group (basal diet) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.90 None 0.00 None None None None None None None None
10033 10033 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 87.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10034 10034 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 90.00 None 87.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10035 10035 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 87.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10373 10373 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10441 10441 Any antimicrobial use Routinely given to suckling pigs Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 42.40 None 40.00 None None None None None None None None
10374 10374 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10443 10443 Any antimicrobial use Some given to nursing sows Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 39.00 None 22.90 None None None None None None None None
10375 10375 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10440 10440 Any antimicrobial use Routinely given to nursing sows Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 27.90 None 22.90 None None None None None None None None
10376 10376 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10442 10442 Any antimicrobial use Some given to dry sows Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 37.00 None 32.70 None None None None None None None None
10377 10377 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10438 10438 Any antimicrobial use Number of class-specific individual treatments (any drug) < or = 3.6 treatments/1000 pig days Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 81.90 None 64.50 None None None None None None None None
10378 10378 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10439 10439 Any antimicrobial use Number of class-specific individual treatments (any drug) > 3.6 treatments/1000 pig days Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 81.90 None 64.50 None None None None None None None None
10379 10379 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10445 10445 Any antimicrobial use Some given to weanling pigs Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 84.40 None 65.80 None None None None None None None None
10380 10380 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10444 10444 Any antimicrobial use Some given to suckling pigs Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 78.10 None 60.50 None None None None None None None None
10381 10381 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10441 10441 Any antimicrobial use Routinely given to suckling pigs Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 83.30 None 60.50 None None None None None None None None
10382 10382 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10443 10443 Any antimicrobial use Some given to nursing sows Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 79.40 None 33.70 None None None None None None None None
10383 10383 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10440 10440 Any antimicrobial use Routinely given to nursing sows Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 73.30 None 33.70 None None None None None None None None
10384 10384 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10442 10442 Any antimicrobial use Some given to dry sows Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 71.10 None 79.10 None None None None None None None None
10385 10385 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10462 10462 Number of sows and unbred gilts 91 - 120 sows and unbred gilts 91 - 120 sows and unbred gilts 31 - 90 sows and unbred gilts Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 16.20 None 24.60 None None None None None None None None
10386 10386 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10461 10461 Number of sows and unbred gilts 121 - 150 sows and unbred gilts 121 - 150 sows and unbred gilts 31 - 90 sows and unbred gilts Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 31.20 None 24.60 None None None None None None None None
10387 10387 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10460 10460 Number of sows and unbred gilts > 150 sows and unbred gilts > 150 sows and unbred gilts 31 - 90 sows and unbred gilts Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 28.50 None 24.60 None None None None None None None None
10388 10388 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10465 10465 Type of grower-finisher housing Barn attached Barn attached Bank barn Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 22.00 None 31.50 None None None None None None None None
10389 10389 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10466 10466 Type of grower-finisher housing Barn separated Barn attached Bank barn Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 22.80 None 31.50 None None None None None None None None
10390 10390 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10453 10453 Herd policy on new animal introductions Purchased boars only vs boars and gilts Purchased boars only Purchased boars and gilts Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 20.50 None 25.00 None None None None None None None None
10391 10391 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10462 10462 Number of sows and unbred gilts 91 - 120 sows and unbred gilts 91 - 120 sows and unbred gilts 31 - 90 sows and unbred gilts Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.33 None None None None None None None None
10077 10077 10069 None 11884 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01023.x Moro2000 Effects of heat stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10192 10192 Heat stress exposure Exposed to 34 C (heat stress) and 65% relative humidity for 24 h. Samples from pig caecum. Heat stress exposure No heat stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 76.00 23.00 83.00 17.00 60 60 None None None None None
10078 10078 10069 None 11884 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01023.x Moro2000 Effects of heat stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10194 10194 Heat stress exposure Exposed to 34 C (heat stress) and 65% relative humidity for 24 h. Samples from pig rectum. Heat stress exposure No heat stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 39.00 29.00 4.00 50.00 30 30 None None None None None
10079 10079 10069 None 11884 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01023.x Moro2000 Effects of heat stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10194 10194 Heat stress exposure Exposed to 34 C (heat stress) and 65% relative humidity for 24 h. Samples from pig rectum. Heat stress exposure No heat stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 71.00 29.00 46.00 50.00 30 30 None None None None None
10080 10080 10069 None 11884 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01023.x Moro2000 Effects of heat stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10191 10191 Heat stress exposure Exposed to 34 C (heat stress) and 65% relative humidity for 24 h. Results from carcass sampling & swabbing. Heat stress exposure No heat stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 80.00 None 40.00 None None None None None None None None
10081 10081 10069 None 11884 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01023.x Moro2000 Effects of heat stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10189 10189 Heat stress exposure Exposed to 34 C (heat stress) and 65% relative humidity for 24 h Heat stress exposure No heat stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 52.00 16.00 9.00 73.00 90 90 None None None None None
10082 10082 10069 None 11884 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01023.x Moro2000 Effects of heat stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10189 10189 Heat stress exposure Exposed to 34 C (heat stress) and 65% relative humidity for 24 h Heat stress exposure No heat stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 83.00 16.00 24.00 73.00 90 90 None None None None None
10083 10083 10070 None 11885 Moro1998 Effects of cold stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine. United States of America Observational 10196 10196 Cold stress Cold stress faecal samples were collected 24h following sudden and drastic drops in temperature (>15 °C) during winter months. Control: Collections were made following a period of at least 7d of weather considered to be seasonally normal and stable. Cold stress No cold stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 55.00 None 20.00 None 472 493 None None None None None
10084 10084 10070 None 11885 Moro1998 Effects of cold stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine. United States of America Observational 10196 10196 Cold stress Cold stress faecal samples were collected 24h following sudden and drastic drops in temperature (>15 °C) during winter months. Control: Collections were made following a period of at least 7d of weather considered to be seasonally normal and stable. Cold stress No cold stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 35.00 None 12.00 None 472 493 None None None None None
10085 10085 10070 None 11885 Moro1998 Effects of cold stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine. United States of America Observational 10195 10195 Cold stress Cold stress faecal samples were collected 24h following sudden and drastic drops in temperature (>15 °C) during winter months. Control: Collections were made following a period of at least 7d of weather considered to be seasonally normal and stable. Cold stress No cold stress Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 40.00 None 9.00 None 472 493 None None None None None
10086 10086 10070 None 11885 Moro1998 Effects of cold stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine. United States of America Observational 10197 10197 Cold stress Cold stress faecal samples were collected 24h following sudden and drastic drops in temperature (>15 °C) during winter months. Control: Collections were made following a period of at least 7d of weather considered to be seasonally normal and stable. Cold stress No cold stress Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 45.00 None 8.00 None 472 493 None None None None None
10087 10087 10070 None 11885 Moro1998 Effects of cold stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine. United States of America Observational 10196 10196 Cold stress Cold stress faecal samples were collected 24h following sudden and drastic drops in temperature (>15 °C) during winter months. Control: Collections were made following a period of at least 7d of weather considered to be seasonally normal and stable. Cold stress No cold stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 90.00 None 68.00 None 472 493 None None None None None
10088 10088 10070 None 11885 Moro1998 Effects of cold stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine. United States of America Observational 10196 10196 Cold stress Cold stress faecal samples were collected 24h following sudden and drastic drops in temperature (>15 °C) during winter months. Control: Collections were made following a period of at least 7d of weather considered to be seasonally normal and stable. Cold stress No cold stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 75.00 None 55.00 None 472 493 None None None None None
10089 10089 10070 None 11885 Moro1998 Effects of cold stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine. United States of America Observational 10195 10195 Cold stress Cold stress faecal samples were collected 24h following sudden and drastic drops in temperature (>15 °C) during winter months. Control: Collections were made following a period of at least 7d of weather considered to be seasonally normal and stable. Cold stress No cold stress Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 65.00 None 42.00 None 472 493 None None None None None
10090 10090 10070 None 11885 Moro1998 Effects of cold stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine. United States of America Observational 10197 10197 Cold stress Cold stress faecal samples were collected 24h following sudden and drastic drops in temperature (>15 °C) during winter months. Control: Collections were made following a period of at least 7d of weather considered to be seasonally normal and stable. Cold stress No cold stress Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 75.00 None 51.00 None 472 493 None None None None None
10091 10091 10070 None 11885 Moro1998 Effects of cold stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine. United States of America Observational 10198 10198 Cold stress Cold stress faecal samples were collected 24h following sudden and drastic drops in temperature (>15 °C) during winter months. Control: Collections were made following a period of at least 7d of weather considered to be seasonally normal and stable. Cold stress No cold stress Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 31.00 23.00 9.00 48.00 472 493 None None None None None
10092 10092 10070 None 11885 Moro1998 Effects of cold stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine. United States of America Observational 10198 10198 Cold stress Cold stress faecal samples were collected 24h following sudden and drastic drops in temperature (>15 °C) during winter months. Control: Collections were made following a period of at least 7d of weather considered to be seasonally normal and stable. Cold stress No cold stress Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 73.00 23.00 49.00 48.00 472 493 None None None None None
10093 10093 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10259 10259 Beta-lactam use Antimicrobial exposure rate per 1000 pig-days for all antimicrobial classes combined for grow-finishers = 301 (median), interquartile range = 16 - 965 Any beta-lactam use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pen Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.80 1.60 5.00 0.0005 None
10094 10094 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10255 10255 Aminoglycoside use Antimicrobial exposure rate per 1000 pig-days for all antimicrobial classes combined for sucklings = 3 (median), interquartile range = 0 - 750 Any aminoglycoside use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pen Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.30 1.20 4.60 0.02 None
10095 10095 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10264 10264 High macrolide use Antimicrobial exposure rate per 1000 pig-days for all antimicrobial classes combined for grow-finishers = >500 High macrolide use No macrolide use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pen Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 5.90 2.20 16.00 0.04 None
10096 10096 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10265 10265 Low macrolide use Antimicrobial exposure rate per 1000 pig-days for all antimicrobial classes combined for grow-finishers = 0.1 - 500 Low macrolide use No macrolide use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pen Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.40 0.60 3.40 None None
10099 10099 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10256 10256 Aminoglycoside use - nursery Antimicrobial exposure rate per 1000 pig-days for all antimicrobial classes combined for nursery = 929 (median), interquartile range = 663 - 1230 Any aminoglycoside use No use Swine None None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pen Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia None False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.60 1.40 4.70 0.002 None
10101 10101 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10263 10263 High macrolide use Antimicrobial exposure rate per 1000 pig-days for all antimicrobial classes combined for grow-finishers = > 500 High macrolide use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pen Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 6.00 3.60 10.00 None None
10102 10102 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10266 10266 Low macrolide use Antimicrobial exposure rate per 1000 pig-days for all antimicrobial classes combined for grow-finishers = 0.1 - 500 Low macrolide use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pen Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.30 1.40 3.90 None None
10104 10104 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10255 10255 Aminoglycoside use Antimicrobial exposure rate per 1000 pig-days for all antimicrobial classes combined for sucklings = 3 (median), interquartile range = 0 - 750 Any aminoglycoside use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pen Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.40 1.10 5.50 0.04 None
10105 10105 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10254 10254 Aminoglycoside use Antimicrobial exposure rate per 1000 pig-days for all antimicrobial classes combined for nursery = 929 (median), interquartile range = 663 - 1230 Any aminoglycoside use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pen Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.20 1.50 3.10 < 0.0001 None
10108 10108 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10271 10271 Sulfonamide use Antimicrobial exposure rate per 1000 pig-days for all antimicrobial classes combined for nursery = 929 (median), interquartile range = 663 - 1230 Any sulfonamide use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pen Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.60 2.00 10.50 0.0004 None
10109 10109 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10267 10267 Macrolide use Antimicrobial exposure rate per 1000 pig-days for all antimicrobial classes combined for sows = 0 (median), interquartile range = 0 - 20 Any macrolide use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pen Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.90 1.60 9.60 0.003 None
10112 10112 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10259 10259 Beta-lactam use Antimicrobial exposure rate per 1000 pig-days for all antimicrobial classes combined for grow-finishers = 301 (median), interquartile range = 16 - 965 Any beta-lactam use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pen Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 7.90 2.80 21.00 <0.0001 None
10113 10113 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10261 10261 Herd type Commercial vs breeding stock Commercial Breeding Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.60 1.50 4.90 0.004 None
10392 10392 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10461 10461 Number of sows and unbred gilts 121 - 150 sows and unbred gilts 121 - 150 sows and unbred gilts 31 - 90 sows and unbred gilts Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.76 None 0.33 None None None None None None None None
10393 10393 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10460 10460 Number of sows and unbred gilts > 150 sows and unbred gilts > 150 sows and unbred gilts 31 - 90 sows and unbred gilts Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.85 None 0.33 None None None None None None None None
10394 10394 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10465 10465 Type of grower-finisher housing Barn attached Barn attached Bank barn Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None None None None None None None None
10395 10395 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10466 10466 Type of grower-finisher housing Barn separated Barn attached Bank barn Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.99 None 0.00 None None None None None None None None
10036 10036 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 90.00 None 87.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10037 10037 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10094 10094 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins piperacillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 80.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10038 10038 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins piperacillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 90.00 None 87.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10039 10039 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10040 10040 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10041 10041 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 23.00 None 23.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10042 10042 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 27.00 None 27.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10043 10043 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones marbofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 23.00 None 15.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10044 10044 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones marbofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 27.00 None 23.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10045 10045 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 53.00 None 36.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10046 10046 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 43.00 None 53.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10047 10047 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 47.00 None 27.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10048 10048 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 40.00 None 30.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10049 10049 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 93.00 None 100.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10050 10050 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10053 10053 10056 None 11605 10.3390/ijerph120202150 Mazurek2015 Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from pigs during metaphylactic trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment and in the post-exposure period Poland Experimental 10148 10148 Duration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use P2 (7-wk-old cohort, sampled after 2 wks of AMU) P1 (6-wk-old cohort, sampled after 1 wk of AMU). Metaphylactic treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as medicated fodder, 15–30 mg active substance/1 kg body weight/day, to post-weaning piglets. Two Weeks (P2) One Week (P1) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 71 None 58 None None None None None 72 59 None None None None None
10054 10054 10056 None 11605 10.3390/ijerph120202150 Mazurek2015 Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from pigs during metaphylactic trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment and in the post-exposure period Poland Experimental 10148 10148 Duration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use P2 (7-wk-old cohort, sampled after 2 wks of AMU) P1 (6-wk-old cohort, sampled after 1 wk of AMU). Metaphylactic treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as medicated fodder, 15–30 mg active substance/1 kg body weight/day, to post-weaning piglets. Two Weeks (P2) One Week (P1) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False 71 None 59 None None None None None 72 59 None None None None None
10055 10055 10056 None 11605 10.3390/ijerph120202150 Mazurek2015 Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from pigs during metaphylactic trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment and in the post-exposure period Poland Experimental 10150 10150 Duration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use P3 (8-wk-old cohort, sampled after 3 wks of AMU) P1 (6-wk-old cohort, sampled after 1 wk of AMU). Metaphylactic treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as medicated fodder, 15–30 mg active substance/1 kg body weight/day, to post-weaning piglets. Three Weeks (P3) One Week (P1) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 81 None 58 None None None None None 82 59 None None None None None
10056 10056 10056 None 11605 10.3390/ijerph120202150 Mazurek2015 Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from pigs during metaphylactic trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment and in the post-exposure period Poland Experimental 10150 10150 Duration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use P3 (8-wk-old cohort, sampled after 3 wks of AMU) P1 (6-wk-old cohort, sampled after 1 wk of AMU). Metaphylactic treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as medicated fodder, 15–30 mg active substance/1 kg body weight/day, to post-weaning piglets. Three Weeks (P3) One Week (P1) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False 81 None 59 None None None None None 82 59 None None None None None
10057 10057 10056 None 11605 10.3390/ijerph120202150 Mazurek2015 Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from pigs during metaphylactic trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment and in the post-exposure period Poland Experimental 10149 10149 Duration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use P2 (7-wk-old cohort, sampled after 2 wks of AMU) P1 (6-wk-old cohort, sampled after 1 wk of AMU). Metaphylactic treatment: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as medicated fodder, 15–30 mg active substance/1 kg bw/day, to post-weaning piglets. Two Weeks (P2) One Week (P1) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column dfrA1 Escherichia coli False None False 63 None 47 None None None None None 72 59 None None None None None
10058 10058 10056 None 11605 10.3390/ijerph120202150 Mazurek2015 Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from pigs during metaphylactic trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment and in the post-exposure period Poland Experimental 10149 10149 Duration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use P2 (7-wk-old cohort, sampled after 2 wks of AMU) P1 (6-wk-old cohort, sampled after 1 wk of AMU). Metaphylactic treatment: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as medicated fodder, 15–30 mg active substance/1 kg bw/day, to post-weaning piglets. Two Weeks (P2) One Week (P1) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column dfrA5 Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 3 None None None None None 72 59 None None None None None
10059 10059 10056 None 11605 10.3390/ijerph120202150 Mazurek2015 Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from pigs during metaphylactic trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment and in the post-exposure period Poland Experimental 10149 10149 Duration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use P2 (7-wk-old cohort, sampled after 2 wks of AMU) P1 (6-wk-old cohort, sampled after 1 wk of AMU). Metaphylactic treatment: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as medicated fodder, 15–30 mg active substance/1 kg bw/day, to post-weaning piglets. Two Weeks (P2) One Week (P1) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column dfrA7 Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 4 None None None None None 72 59 None None None None None
10060 10060 10056 None 11605 10.3390/ijerph120202150 Mazurek2015 Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from pigs during metaphylactic trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment and in the post-exposure period Poland Experimental 10149 10149 Duration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use P2 (7-wk-old cohort, sampled after 2 wks of AMU) P1 (6-wk-old cohort, sampled after 1 wk of AMU). Metaphylactic treatment: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as medicated fodder, 15–30 mg active substance/1 kg bw/day, to post-weaning piglets. Two Weeks (P2) One Week (P1) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column dfrA12 Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 27 None None None None None 72 59 None None None None None
10061 10061 10062 None 11774 10.1007/s00217-006-0547-y Miranda2008 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli strains isolated from organic and conventional pork meat: A comparative survey Spain Observational 10160 10160 Production type Conventional vs organic production Organic production Conventional production Swine Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 60.00 40.00 10.00 90.00 90 90 None None None None None
10062 10062 10062 None 11774 10.1007/s00217-006-0547-y Miranda2008 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli strains isolated from organic and conventional pork meat: A comparative survey Spain Observational 10160 10160 Production type Conventional vs organic production Organic production Conventional production Swine Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 47.80 52.20 61.10 38.90 90 90 None None None None None
10063 10063 10062 None 11774 10.1007/s00217-006-0547-y Miranda2008 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli strains isolated from organic and conventional pork meat: A comparative survey Spain Observational 10160 10160 Production type Conventional vs organic production Organic production Conventional production Swine Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 93.30 6.70 94.40 5.60 90 90 None None None None None
10064 10064 10062 None 11774 10.1007/s00217-006-0547-y Miranda2008 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli strains isolated from organic and conventional pork meat: A comparative survey Spain Observational 10160 10160 Production type Conventional vs organic production Organic production Conventional production Swine Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Tetracyclines doxycycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 30.00 70.00 11.10 88.90 90 90 None None None None None
10065 10065 10062 None 11774 10.1007/s00217-006-0547-y Miranda2008 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli strains isolated from organic and conventional pork meat: A comparative survey Spain Observational 10160 10160 Production type Conventional vs organic production Organic production Conventional production Swine Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 91.10 8.90 96.70 3.30 90 90 None None None None None
10066 10066 10062 None 11774 10.1007/s00217-006-0547-y Miranda2008 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli strains isolated from organic and conventional pork meat: A comparative survey Spain Observational 10160 10160 Production type Conventional vs organic production Organic production Conventional production Swine Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 91.10 8.90 91.10 8.90 90 90 None None None None None
10067 10067 10062 None 11774 10.1007/s00217-006-0547-y Miranda2008 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli strains isolated from organic and conventional pork meat: A comparative survey Spain Observational 10160 10160 Production type Conventional vs organic production Organic production Conventional production Swine Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 91.10 8.90 93.30 6.70 90 90 None None None None None
10002 10002 10024 None 10723 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.304 Kim2005 Susceptibility of Escherichia coli from Growing Piglets Receiving Antimicrobial Feed Additives United States of America Experimental 10066 10066 Apramaycin sulfate, carbadox, and chlortetracycline hydroxchloride use All used as feed additives. Apramaycin sulfate: 150 g/ton as Apralan 7; 5 lb/pig at weaning. Carbadox: 50 g/ton as Mecadox 2.5; about 15 lb/pig. Chlortetracycline hydroxchloride: 250 g/ton; 14 days ad libitum. Apramaycin sulfate, carbadox, and chlortetracycline hydroxchloride use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 56.60 26.30 57.20 38.00 5334 5875 None None None None None
10006 10006 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 66.00 None 20.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10007 10007 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10095 10095 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed (sample at grower period) Tiamulin and amoxicillin use (sample at grower period) No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 50.00 None 20.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10009 10009 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides tobramycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 63.00 None 23.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10010 10010 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10095 10095 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed (sample at grower period) Tiamulin and amoxicillin use (sample at grower period) No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides tobramycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 50.00 None 23.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10011 10011 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalexin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 43.00 None 16.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10012 10012 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10095 10095 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed (sample at grower period) Tiamulin and amoxicillin use (sample at grower period) No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalexin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 47.00 None 20.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10013 10013 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefpodoxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 43.00 None 16.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10014 10014 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10095 10095 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed (sample at grower period) Tiamulin and amoxicillin use (sample at grower period) No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefpodoxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 47.00 None 16.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10068 10068 10062 None 11774 10.1007/s00217-006-0547-y Miranda2008 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli strains isolated from organic and conventional pork meat: A comparative survey Spain Observational 10160 10160 Production type Conventional vs organic production Organic production Conventional production Swine Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 72.20 27.80 28.90 71.10 90 90 None None None None None
10069 10069 10062 None 11774 10.1007/s00217-006-0547-y Miranda2008 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli strains isolated from organic and conventional pork meat: A comparative survey Spain Observational 10160 10160 Production type Conventional vs organic production Organic production Conventional production Swine Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.30 96.70 4.40 95.60 90 90 None None None None None
10070 10070 10069 None 11884 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01023.x Moro2000 Effects of heat stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10189 10189 Heat stress exposure Exposed to 34 C (heat stress) and 65% relative humidity for 24 h Heat stress exposure No heat stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 75.00 5.00 30.00 20.00 100 100 None None None None None
10071 10071 10069 None 11884 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01023.x Moro2000 Effects of heat stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10190 10190 Heat stress exposure Exposed to 34 C (heat stress) and 65% relative humidity for 24 h. Heat stress exposure No heat stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 75.00 5.00 35.00 20.00 100 100 None None None None None
10072 10072 10069 None 11884 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01023.x Moro2000 Effects of heat stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10190 10190 Heat stress exposure Exposed to 34 C (heat stress) and 65% relative humidity for 24 h. Heat stress exposure No heat stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 75.00 5.00 35.00 20.00 100 100 None None None None None
10074 10074 10069 None 11884 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01023.x Moro2000 Effects of heat stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10193 10193 Heat stress exposure Exposed to 34 C (heat stress) and 65% relative humidity for 24 h. Samples from pig ileum. Heat stress exposure No heat stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 30.00 17.00 37.00 27.00 60 60 None None None None None
10075 10075 10069 None 11884 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01023.x Moro2000 Effects of heat stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10193 10193 Heat stress exposure Exposed to 34 C (heat stress) and 65% relative humidity for 24 h. Samples from pig ileum. Heat stress exposure No heat stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 73.00 17.00 64.00 27.00 60 60 None None None None None
10076 10076 10069 None 11884 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01023.x Moro2000 Effects of heat stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10192 10192 Heat stress exposure Exposed to 34 C (heat stress) and 65% relative humidity for 24 h. Samples from pig caecum. Heat stress exposure No heat stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 43.00 23.00 20.00 17.00 60 60 None None None None None
10118 10118 10113 None 13302 10.4148/2378-5977.6794 Shelton2009 Effects of copper sulfate, zinc oxide, and neoterramycin on weanling pig growth and antibiotic resistance rate for fecal escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10320 10320 Copper use Phase 2 diet (day 14-42): basal diet with copper from CuSO4 (125 ppm) instead of cornstarch. Copper use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines chlortetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 47.00 None 83.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
10119 10119 10113 None 13302 10.4148/2378-5977.6794 Shelton2009 Effects of copper sulfate, zinc oxide, and neoterramycin on weanling pig growth and antibiotic resistance rate for fecal escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10320 10320 Copper use Phase 2 diet (day 14-42): basal diet with copper from CuSO4 (125 ppm) instead of cornstarch. Copper use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 25.00 None 78.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
10120 10120 10113 None 13302 10.4148/2378-5977.6794 Shelton2009 Effects of copper sulfate, zinc oxide, and neoterramycin on weanling pig growth and antibiotic resistance rate for fecal escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10320 10320 Copper use Phase 2 diet (day 14-42): basal diet with copper from CuSO4 (125 ppm) instead of cornstarch. Copper use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 72.00 None 94.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
10121 10121 10113 None 13302 10.4148/2378-5977.6794 Shelton2009 Effects of copper sulfate, zinc oxide, and neoterramycin on weanling pig growth and antibiotic resistance rate for fecal escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10320 10320 Copper use Phase 2 diet (day 14-42): basal diet with copper from CuSO4 (125 ppm) instead of cornstarch. Copper use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Pleuromutilins tiamulin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 90.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
10126 10126 10113 None 13302 10.4148/2378-5977.6794 Shelton2009 Effects of copper sulfate, zinc oxide, and neoterramycin on weanling pig growth and antibiotic resistance rate for fecal escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10322 10322 Zinc use Phase 2 diet (day 14-42): basal diet with 2,000ppm added Zn from ZnO from d14-28 instead of cornstarch. Zinc use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines chlortetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 81.00 None 83.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
10127 10127 10113 None 13302 10.4148/2378-5977.6794 Shelton2009 Effects of copper sulfate, zinc oxide, and neoterramycin on weanling pig growth and antibiotic resistance rate for fecal escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10322 10322 Zinc use Phase 2 diet (day 14-42): basal diet with 2,000ppm added Zn from ZnO from d14-28 instead of cornstarch. Zinc use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 67.00 None 78.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
10128 10128 10113 None 13302 10.4148/2378-5977.6794 Shelton2009 Effects of copper sulfate, zinc oxide, and neoterramycin on weanling pig growth and antibiotic resistance rate for fecal escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10322 10322 Zinc use Phase 2 diet (day 14-42): basal diet with 2,000ppm added Zn from ZnO from d14-28 instead of cornstarch. Zinc use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 86.00 None 94.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
10129 10129 10113 None 13302 10.4148/2378-5977.6794 Shelton2009 Effects of copper sulfate, zinc oxide, and neoterramycin on weanling pig growth and antibiotic resistance rate for fecal escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10322 10322 Zinc use Phase 2 diet (day 14-42): basal diet with 2,000ppm added Zn from ZnO from d14-28 instead of cornstarch. Zinc use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Pleuromutilins tiamulin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 94.00 None 90.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
10134 10134 10113 None 13302 10.4148/2378-5977.6794 Shelton2009 Effects of copper sulfate, zinc oxide, and neoterramycin on weanling pig growth and antibiotic resistance rate for fecal escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10319 10319 Copper and zinc use Phase 2 diet (day 14 - 42): basal diet with 125 ppm of added Cu from CuSO4 and 2,000 ppm from d14-28 added Zn from ZnO) instead of cornstarch. Copper and zinc use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines chlortetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 89.00 None 83.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
10135 10135 10113 None 13302 10.4148/2378-5977.6794 Shelton2009 Effects of copper sulfate, zinc oxide, and neoterramycin on weanling pig growth and antibiotic resistance rate for fecal escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10318 10318 Copper and zinc use Phase 2 diet (day 14 - 42): basal diet with 125 ppm of added Cu from CuSO4 and 2,000 ppm from d14-28 added Zn from ZnO) instead of cornstarch. Copper and zinc use No use Swine Weaners None None None None Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 83.00 None 78.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
10136 10136 10113 None 13302 10.4148/2378-5977.6794 Shelton2009 Effects of copper sulfate, zinc oxide, and neoterramycin on weanling pig growth and antibiotic resistance rate for fecal escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10319 10319 Copper and zinc use Phase 2 diet (day 14 - 42): basal diet with 125 ppm of added Cu from CuSO4 and 2,000 ppm from d14-28 added Zn from ZnO) instead of cornstarch. Copper and zinc use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 89.00 None 94.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
10137 10137 10113 None 13302 10.4148/2378-5977.6794 Shelton2009 Effects of copper sulfate, zinc oxide, and neoterramycin on weanling pig growth and antibiotic resistance rate for fecal escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10319 10319 Copper and zinc use Phase 2 diet (day 14 - 42): basal diet with 125 ppm of added Cu from CuSO4 and 2,000 ppm from d14-28 added Zn from ZnO) instead of cornstarch. Copper and zinc use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Pleuromutilins tiamulin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 90.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
10142 10142 10113 None 13302 10.4148/2378-5977.6794 Shelton2009 Effects of copper sulfate, zinc oxide, and neoterramycin on weanling pig growth and antibiotic resistance rate for fecal escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10321 10321 Neomycin and oxytetracycline use Phase 2 diet (day 14-42): basal diet with in-feed antibiotic that providing neomycin (50 g/ton) and oxytetracycline (50 g/ton) instead of cornstarch. Neomycin and oxytetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines chlortetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 81.00 None 83.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
10143 10143 10113 None 13302 10.4148/2378-5977.6794 Shelton2009 Effects of copper sulfate, zinc oxide, and neoterramycin on weanling pig growth and antibiotic resistance rate for fecal escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10321 10321 Neomycin and oxytetracycline use Phase 2 diet (day 14-42): basal diet with in-feed antibiotic that providing neomycin (50 g/ton) and oxytetracycline (50 g/ton) instead of cornstarch. Neomycin and oxytetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 81.00 None 78.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
10144 10144 10113 None 13302 10.4148/2378-5977.6794 Shelton2009 Effects of copper sulfate, zinc oxide, and neoterramycin on weanling pig growth and antibiotic resistance rate for fecal escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10321 10321 Neomycin and oxytetracycline use Phase 2 diet (day 14-42): basal diet with in-feed antibiotic that providing neomycin (50 g/ton) and oxytetracycline (50 g/ton) instead of cornstarch. Neomycin and oxytetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 94.00 None 94.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
10145 10145 10113 None 13302 10.4148/2378-5977.6794 Shelton2009 Effects of copper sulfate, zinc oxide, and neoterramycin on weanling pig growth and antibiotic resistance rate for fecal escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10321 10321 Neomycin and oxytetracycline use Phase 2 diet (day 14-42): basal diet with in-feed antibiotic that providing neomycin (50 g/ton) and oxytetracycline (50 g/ton) instead of cornstarch. Neomycin and oxytetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Pleuromutilins tiamulin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 90.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
10159 10159 10119 None 13743 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.05.005 Tamang2015 Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella in pigs from conventional and organic farms and first report of S. serovar 1,4,[5],12: I: - From Korea Democratic People's Republic of Korea Observational 10340 10340 Production type Conventional vs organic production type Organic Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 21 None 45 None None None None None 53 47 None None None None None
10160 10160 10119 None 13743 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.05.005 Tamang2015 Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella in pigs from conventional and organic farms and first report of S. serovar 1,4,[5],12: I: - From Korea Democratic People's Republic of Korea Observational 10340 10340 Production type Conventional vs organic production type Organic Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 53 47 None None None None None
10161 10161 10119 None 13743 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.05.005 Tamang2015 Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella in pigs from conventional and organic farms and first report of S. serovar 1,4,[5],12: I: - From Korea Democratic People's Republic of Korea Observational 10340 10340 Production type Conventional vs organic production type Organic Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 0 None None None None None 53 47 None None None None None
10166 10166 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10342 10342 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at finishing farm slaughter stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 31 None None None None None 1 226 None None None None None
10169 10169 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10342 10342 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at finishing farm slaughter stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 30 None None None None None 1 226 None None None None None
10170 10170 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10342 10342 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at finishing farm slaughter stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 64 None None None None None 1 226 None None None None None
10171 10171 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10342 10342 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at finishing farm slaughter stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 48 None None None None None 1 226 None None None None None
10172 10172 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10342 10342 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at finishing farm slaughter stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 202 None None None None None 1 226 None None None None None
10173 10173 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10342 10342 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at finishing farm slaughter stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 1 226 None None None None None
10174 10174 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10342 10342 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at finishing farm slaughter stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 1 226 None None None None None
10175 10175 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10342 10342 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at finishing farm slaughter stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 1 226 None None None None None
10176 10176 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10346 10346 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at pre-evisceration stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 43 5 None None None None None
10177 10177 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10346 10346 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at pre-evisceration stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 43 5 None None None None None
10178 10178 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10346 10346 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at pre-evisceration stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 24 None 0 None None None None None 43 5 None None None None None
10179 10179 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10346 10346 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at pre-evisceration stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella spp. False None False 22 None 0 None None None None None 43 5 None None None None None
10180 10180 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10346 10346 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at pre-evisceration stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 17 None 5 None None None None None 43 5 None None None None None
10181 10181 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10346 10346 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at pre-evisceration stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 43 5 None None None None None
10182 10182 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10346 10346 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at pre-evisceration stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 43 5 None None None None None
10183 10183 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10346 10346 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at pre-evisceration stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 43 5 None None None None None
10184 10184 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10345 10345 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at post-evisceration stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 3 None 0 None None None None None 73 12 None None None None None
10185 10185 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10345 10345 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at post-evisceration stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 73 12 None None None None None
10186 10186 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10345 10345 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at post-evisceration stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 24 None 1 None None None None None 73 12 None None None None None
10187 10187 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10345 10345 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at post-evisceration stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella spp. False None False 22 None 1 None None None None None 73 12 None None None None None
10188 10188 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10345 10345 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at post-evisceration stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 57 None 8 None None None None None 73 12 None None None None None
10189 10189 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10345 10345 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at post-evisceration stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 2 None 0 None None None None None 73 12 None None None None None
10190 10190 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10345 10345 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at post-evisceration stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella spp. False None False 2 None 0 None None None None None 73 12 None None None None None
10191 10191 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10345 10345 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at post-evisceration stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 73 12 None None None None None
10192 10192 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10344 10344 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at post-chill stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 4 None 0 None None None None None 25 15 None None None None None
10193 10193 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10344 10344 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at post-chill stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 25 15 None None None None None
10194 10194 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10344 10344 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at post-chill stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 9 None 3 None None None None None 25 15 None None None None None
10195 10195 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10344 10344 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at post-chill stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella spp. False None False 5 None 0 None None None None None 25 15 None None None None None
10196 10196 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10344 10344 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at post-chill stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 19 None 5 None None None None None 25 15 None None None None None
10197 10197 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10344 10344 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at post-chill stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 2 None 0 None None None None None 25 15 None None None None None
10198 10198 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10344 10344 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at post-chill stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella spp. False None False 3 None 0 None None None None None 25 15 None None None None None
10199 10199 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10344 10344 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at post-chill stage. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 25 15 None None None None None
10200 10200 10024 None 10723 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.304 Kim2005 Susceptibility of Escherichia coli from Growing Piglets Receiving Antimicrobial Feed Additives United States of America Experimental 10066 10066 Apramaycin sulfate, carbadox, and chlortetracycline hydroxchloride use All used as feed additives. Apramaycin sulfate: 150 g/ton as Apralan 7; 5 lb/pig at weaning. Carbadox: 50 g/ton as Mecadox 2.5; about 15 lb/pig. Chlortetracycline hydroxchloride: 250 g/ton; 14 days ad libitum. Apramaycin sulfate, carbadox, and chlortetracycline hydroxchloride use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials aminoglycosides, combinations with other antibacterials None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.00 26.30 0.40 38.00 472 38 None None None None None
10201 10201 10024 None 10723 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.304 Kim2005 Susceptibility of Escherichia coli from Growing Piglets Receiving Antimicrobial Feed Additives United States of America Experimental 10066 10066 Apramaycin sulfate, carbadox, and chlortetracycline hydroxchloride use All used as feed additives. Apramaycin sulfate: 150 g/ton as Apralan 7; 5 lb/pig at weaning. Carbadox: 50 g/ton as Mecadox 2.5; about 15 lb/pig. Chlortetracycline hydroxchloride: 250 g/ton; 14 days ad libitum. Apramaycin sulfate, carbadox, and chlortetracycline hydroxchloride use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials tetracyclines, combinations with other antibacterials None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 11.60 26.30 4.20 38.00 1094 430 None None None None None
10202 10202 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10085 10085 Ceftiofur use Piglets were subjected to parenteral administration of a sub-therapeutic dosage of ceftiofur (Naxcel) at 0.5 mg/kg BW (body weight) parenterally once daily during a three days’ treatment period. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 20.00 None 0.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10203 10203 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10085 10085 Ceftiofur use Piglets were subjected to parenteral administration of a sub-therapeutic dosage of ceftiofur (Naxcel) at 0.5 mg/kg BW (body weight) parenterally once daily during a three days’ treatment period. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.00 None 0.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10204 10204 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10085 10085 Ceftiofur use Piglets were subjected to parenteral administration of a sub-therapeutic dosage of ceftiofur (Naxcel) at 0.5 mg/kg BW (body weight) parenterally once daily during a three days’ treatment period. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 65.00 None 15.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10205 10205 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10085 10085 Ceftiofur use Piglets were subjected to parenteral administration of a sub-therapeutic dosage of ceftiofur (Naxcel) at 0.5 mg/kg BW (body weight) parenterally once daily during a three days’ treatment period. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 0.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10206 10206 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10085 10085 Ceftiofur use Piglets were subjected to parenteral administration of a sub-therapeutic dosage of ceftiofur (Naxcel) at 0.5 mg/kg BW (body weight) parenterally once daily during a three days’ treatment period. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 95.00 None 100.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10207 10207 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10085 10085 Ceftiofur use Piglets were subjected to parenteral administration of a sub-therapeutic dosage of ceftiofur (Naxcel) at 0.5 mg/kg BW (body weight) parenterally once daily during a three days’ treatment period. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 15.00 None 75.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10208 10208 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10085 10085 Ceftiofur use Piglets were subjected to parenteral administration of a sub-therapeutic dosage of ceftiofur (Naxcel) at 0.5 mg/kg BW (body weight) parenterally once daily during a three days’ treatment period. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 40.00 None 80.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10209 10209 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10085 10085 Ceftiofur use Piglets were subjected to parenteral administration of a sub-therapeutic dosage of ceftiofur (Naxcel) at 0.5 mg/kg BW (body weight) parenterally once daily during a three days’ treatment period. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 5.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10211 10211 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10086 10086 Ceftiofur use Treated parenterally with a therapeutic dosage of ceftiofur (Naxcel) at 5 mg/kg BW (body weight) once a day for 3 days by intramuscular injection. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 25.00 None 0.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10213 10213 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10086 10086 Ceftiofur use Treated parenterally with a therapeutic dosage of ceftiofur (Naxcel) at 5 mg/kg BW (body weight) once a day for 3 days by intramuscular injection. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 55.00 None 0.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10214 10214 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10086 10086 Ceftiofur use Treated parenterally with a therapeutic dosage of ceftiofur (Naxcel) at 5 mg/kg BW (body weight) once a day for 3 days by intramuscular injection. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 65.00 None 15.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10215 10215 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10086 10086 Ceftiofur use Treated parenterally with a therapeutic dosage of ceftiofur (Naxcel) at 5 mg/kg BW (body weight) once a day for 3 days by intramuscular injection. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 25.00 None 0.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10216 10216 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10086 10086 Ceftiofur use Treated parenterally with a therapeutic dosage of ceftiofur (Naxcel) at 5 mg/kg BW (body weight) once a day for 3 days by intramuscular injection. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 75.00 None 100.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10217 10217 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10086 10086 Ceftiofur use Treated parenterally with a therapeutic dosage of ceftiofur (Naxcel) at 5 mg/kg BW (body weight) once a day for 3 days by intramuscular injection. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 55.00 None 75.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10218 10218 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10086 10086 Ceftiofur use Treated parenterally with a therapeutic dosage of ceftiofur (Naxcel) at 5 mg/kg BW (body weight) once a day for 3 days by intramuscular injection. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 95.00 None 80.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10219 10219 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10086 10086 Ceftiofur use Treated parenterally with a therapeutic dosage of ceftiofur (Naxcel) at 5 mg/kg BW (body weight) once a day for 3 days by intramuscular injection. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 50.00 None 5.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10220 10220 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10087 10087 Enrofloxacin use Gavaged with a therapeutic dosage of enrofloxacin at 10 mg/kg of body weight once per day for 7 days. Enrofloxacin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.00 None 0.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10221 10221 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10087 10087 Enrofloxacin use Gavaged with a therapeutic dosage of enrofloxacin at 10 mg/kg of body weight once per day for 7 days. Enrofloxacin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 40.00 None 0.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10222 10222 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10087 10087 Enrofloxacin use Gavaged with a therapeutic dosage of enrofloxacin at 10 mg/kg of body weight once per day for 7 days. Enrofloxacin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 60.00 None 15.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10223 10223 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10087 10087 Enrofloxacin use Gavaged with a therapeutic dosage of enrofloxacin at 10 mg/kg of body weight once per day for 7 days. Enrofloxacin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.00 None 0.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10224 10224 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10087 10087 Enrofloxacin use Gavaged with a therapeutic dosage of enrofloxacin at 10 mg/kg of body weight once per day for 7 days. Enrofloxacin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10225 10225 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10087 10087 Enrofloxacin use Gavaged with a therapeutic dosage of enrofloxacin at 10 mg/kg of body weight once per day for 7 days. Enrofloxacin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 75.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10226 10226 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10087 10087 Enrofloxacin use Gavaged with a therapeutic dosage of enrofloxacin at 10 mg/kg of body weight once per day for 7 days. Enrofloxacin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 80.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10227 10227 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10087 10087 Enrofloxacin use Gavaged with a therapeutic dosage of enrofloxacin at 10 mg/kg of body weight once per day for 7 days. Enrofloxacin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 20.00 None 5.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10229 10229 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10088 10088 Enrofloxacin use Gavaged with sub-therapeutic dosage of enrofloxacin at 1 mg/kg of body weight once per day for 7 days. Enrofloxacin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 0.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10230 10230 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10088 10088 Enrofloxacin use Gavaged with sub-therapeutic dosage of enrofloxacin at 1 mg/kg of body weight once per day for 7 days. Enrofloxacin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 50.00 None 0.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10231 10231 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10088 10088 Enrofloxacin use Gavaged with sub-therapeutic dosage of enrofloxacin at 1 mg/kg of body weight once per day for 7 days. Enrofloxacin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 40.00 None 15.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10232 10232 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10088 10088 Enrofloxacin use Gavaged with sub-therapeutic dosage of enrofloxacin at 1 mg/kg of body weight once per day for 7 days. Enrofloxacin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 0.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10233 10233 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10088 10088 Enrofloxacin use Gavaged with sub-therapeutic dosage of enrofloxacin at 1 mg/kg of body weight once per day for 7 days. Enrofloxacin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 80.00 None 100.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10234 10234 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10088 10088 Enrofloxacin use Gavaged with sub-therapeutic dosage of enrofloxacin at 1 mg/kg of body weight once per day for 7 days. Enrofloxacin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 85.00 None 75.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10235 10235 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10088 10088 Enrofloxacin use Gavaged with sub-therapeutic dosage of enrofloxacin at 1 mg/kg of body weight once per day for 7 days. Enrofloxacin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 80.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10236 10236 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10088 10088 Enrofloxacin use Gavaged with sub-therapeutic dosage of enrofloxacin at 1 mg/kg of body weight once per day for 7 days. Enrofloxacin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 15.00 None 5.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10237 10237 10056 None 11605 10.3390/ijerph120202150 Mazurek2015 Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from pigs during metaphylactic trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment and in the post-exposure period Poland Experimental 10149 10149 Duration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use P2 (7-wk-old cohort, sampled after 2 wks of AMU) P1 (6-wk-old cohort, sampled after 1 wk of AMU). Metaphylactic treatment: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as medicated fodder, 15–30 mg active substance/1 kg bw/day, to post-weaning piglets. Two Weeks (P2) One Week (P1) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column sul1 Escherichia coli False None False 56 None 32 None None None None None 72 59 None None None None None
10238 10238 10056 None 11605 10.3390/ijerph120202150 Mazurek2015 Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from pigs during metaphylactic trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment and in the post-exposure period Poland Experimental 10149 10149 Duration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use P2 (7-wk-old cohort, sampled after 2 wks of AMU) P1 (6-wk-old cohort, sampled after 1 wk of AMU). Metaphylactic treatment: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as medicated fodder, 15–30 mg active substance/1 kg bw/day, to post-weaning piglets. Two Weeks (P2) One Week (P1) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column sul2 Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 7 None None None None None 72 59 None None None None None
10239 10239 10126 None 14069 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Varga2009a Associations between reported on-farm antimicrobial use practices and observed antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli isolated from Alberta finishing swine farms Canada Observational 10353 10353 Antimicrobial use In-feed use of any antimicrobial use in finishers Antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.92 1.31 6.55 0.009 None
10240 10240 10126 None 14069 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Varga2009a Associations between reported on-farm antimicrobial use practices and observed antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli isolated from Alberta finishing swine farms Canada Observational 10355 10355 Chlortetracycline use In-feed chlortetracycline use in growers Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.78 1.51 9.49 0.005 None
10241 10241 10126 None 14069 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Varga2009a Associations between reported on-farm antimicrobial use practices and observed antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli isolated from Alberta finishing swine farms Canada Observational 10356 10356 Chlortetracycline-sulfamethazine-penicillin use In-feed chlortetracycline-sulfamethazine-penicillin use in weaners Chlortetracycline-sulfamethazine-penicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.25 1.16 4.44 0.016 None
10396 10396 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10453 10453 Herd policy on new animal introductions Purchased boars only vs boars and gilts Purchased boars only Purchased boars and gilts Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None None None None None None None None
10242 10242 10126 None 14069 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Varga2009a Associations between reported on-farm antimicrobial use practices and observed antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli isolated from Alberta finishing swine farms Canada Observational 10359 10359 Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use through injections in weaners Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.42 0.21 0.83 0.012 None
10243 10243 10126 None 14069 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Varga2009a Associations between reported on-farm antimicrobial use practices and observed antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli isolated from Alberta finishing swine farms Canada Observational 10353 10353 Antimicrobial use In-feed use of any antimicrobial use in finishers Antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.22 1.05 17.12 0.042 None
10244 10244 10126 None 14069 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Varga2009a Associations between reported on-farm antimicrobial use practices and observed antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli isolated from Alberta finishing swine farms Canada Observational 10354 10354 Antimicrobial use Use of any antimicrobial through water in growers Antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 5.69 1.13 28.79 0.035 None
10245 10245 10126 None 14069 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Varga2009a Associations between reported on-farm antimicrobial use practices and observed antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli isolated from Alberta finishing swine farms Canada Observational 10359 10359 Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use through injections in weaners Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.18 0.05 0.64 0.008 None
10246 10246 10126 None 14069 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Varga2009a Associations between reported on-farm antimicrobial use practices and observed antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli isolated from Alberta finishing swine farms Canada Observational 10353 10353 Antimicrobial use In-feed use of any antimicrobial use in finishers Antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.90 2.01 7.54 <0.001 None
10247 10247 10126 None 14069 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Varga2009a Associations between reported on-farm antimicrobial use practices and observed antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli isolated from Alberta finishing swine farms Canada Observational 10359 10359 Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use through injections in weaners Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.42 0.24 0.74 0.002 None
10248 10248 10126 None 14069 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Varga2009a Associations between reported on-farm antimicrobial use practices and observed antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli isolated from Alberta finishing swine farms Canada Observational 10358 10358 Oxytetracycline use Oxytetracycline use through injections in growers Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.43 0.23 0.79 0.006 None
10249 10249 10126 None 14069 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Varga2009a Associations between reported on-farm antimicrobial use practices and observed antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli isolated from Alberta finishing swine farms Canada Observational 10353 10353 Antimicrobial use In-feed use of any antimicrobial use in finishers Antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.35 1.86 10.07 0.001 None
10250 10250 10126 None 14069 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Varga2009a Associations between reported on-farm antimicrobial use practices and observed antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli isolated from Alberta finishing swine farms Canada Observational 10360 10360 Tylosin use Tylosin use through injections in growers Tylosin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.19 1.28 13.74 0.017 None
10251 10251 10126 None 14069 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Varga2009a Associations between reported on-farm antimicrobial use practices and observed antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli isolated from Alberta finishing swine farms Canada Observational 10359 10359 Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use through injections in weaners Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.26 0.12 0.55 0.001 None
10252 10252 10126 None 14069 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Varga2009a Associations between reported on-farm antimicrobial use practices and observed antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli isolated from Alberta finishing swine farms Canada Observational 10360 10360 Tylosin use Tylosin use through injections in growers Tylosin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.61 1.31 16.28 0.017 None
10253 10253 10126 None 14069 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Varga2009a Associations between reported on-farm antimicrobial use practices and observed antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli isolated from Alberta finishing swine farms Canada Observational 10355 10355 Chlortetracycline use In-feed chlortetracycline use in growers Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 14.44 2.56 81.45 0.002 None
10254 10254 10126 None 14069 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Varga2009a Associations between reported on-farm antimicrobial use practices and observed antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli isolated from Alberta finishing swine farms Canada Observational 10357 10357 Oxytetracycline use Oxytetracycline use in-feed in growers Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 18.00 2.97 107.77 0.002 None
10255 10255 10126 None 14069 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Varga2009a Associations between reported on-farm antimicrobial use practices and observed antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli isolated from Alberta finishing swine farms Canada Observational 10356 10356 Chlortetracycline-sulfamethazine-penicillin use In-feed chlortetracycline-sulfamethazine-penicillin use in weaners Chlortetracycline-sulfamethazine-penicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.13 1.17 8.33 0.022 None
10256 10256 10126 None 14069 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Varga2009a Associations between reported on-farm antimicrobial use practices and observed antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli isolated from Alberta finishing swine farms Canada Observational 10359 10359 Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use through injections in weaners Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.16 0.06 0.42 <0.001 None
10257 10257 10127 None 14111 10.1089/fpd.2008.0152 Vieira2009 Association between tetracycline consumption and tetracycline resistance in Escherichia coli from healthy Danish slaughter pigs. Denmark Observational 10369 10369 Tetracycline use Prescription of tetracycline in the 3 months previous to sampling Tetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 75 107 124 287 None None None None 182 411 None None None None None
10258 10258 10127 None 14111 10.1089/fpd.2008.0152 Vieira2009 Association between tetracycline consumption and tetracycline resistance in Escherichia coli from healthy Danish slaughter pigs. Denmark Observational 10368 10368 Tetracycline use Prescription of tetracycline in the 12 months previous to sampling Tetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 105 166 94 228 None None None None 271 322 None None None None None
10259 10259 10127 None 14111 10.1089/fpd.2008.0152 Vieira2009 Association between tetracycline consumption and tetracycline resistance in Escherichia coli from healthy Danish slaughter pigs. Denmark Observational 10365 10365 Herd size Moderate vs small herd size. Moderate = 201 - 1000 slaughter pigs in the herd in a year. Small = 1 - 200. Moderate herd size Small herd size Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 26 47 15 11 None None None None 73 26 None None None None None
10260 10260 10119 None 13743 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.05.005 Tamang2015 Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella in pigs from conventional and organic farms and first report of S. serovar 1,4,[5],12: I: - From Korea Democratic People's Republic of Korea Observational 10340 10340 Production type Conventional vs organic production type Organic Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 0 None None None None None 53 47 None None None None None
10261 10261 10119 None 13743 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.05.005 Tamang2015 Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella in pigs from conventional and organic farms and first report of S. serovar 1,4,[5],12: I: - From Korea Democratic People's Republic of Korea Observational 10340 10340 Production type Conventional vs organic production type Organic Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 53 47 None None None None None
10262 10262 10119 None 13743 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.05.005 Tamang2015 Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella in pigs from conventional and organic farms and first report of S. serovar 1,4,[5],12: I: - From Korea Democratic People's Republic of Korea Observational 10340 10340 Production type Conventional vs organic production type Organic Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 20 None None None None None 53 47 None None None None None
10263 10263 10119 None 13743 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.05.005 Tamang2015 Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella in pigs from conventional and organic farms and first report of S. serovar 1,4,[5],12: I: - From Korea Democratic People's Republic of Korea Observational 10340 10340 Production type Conventional vs organic production type Organic Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 53 47 None None None None None
10264 10264 10119 None 13743 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.05.005 Tamang2015 Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella in pigs from conventional and organic farms and first report of S. serovar 1,4,[5],12: I: - From Korea Democratic People's Republic of Korea Observational 10340 10340 Production type Conventional vs organic production type Organic Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Polymyxins colistin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 53 47 None None None None None
10265 10265 10119 None 13743 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.05.005 Tamang2015 Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella in pigs from conventional and organic farms and first report of S. serovar 1,4,[5],12: I: - From Korea Democratic People's Republic of Korea Observational 10340 10340 Production type Conventional vs organic production type Organic Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols florfenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 20 None None None None None 53 47 None None None None None
10266 10266 10119 None 13743 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.05.005 Tamang2015 Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella in pigs from conventional and organic farms and first report of S. serovar 1,4,[5],12: I: - From Korea Democratic People's Republic of Korea Observational 10340 10340 Production type Conventional vs organic production type Organic Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 36 None None None None None 53 47 None None None None None
10267 10267 10119 None 13743 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.05.005 Tamang2015 Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella in pigs from conventional and organic farms and first report of S. serovar 1,4,[5],12: I: - From Korea Democratic People's Republic of Korea Observational 10340 10340 Production type Conventional vs organic production type Organic Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 21 None 18 None None None None None 53 47 None None None None None
10268 10268 10119 None 13743 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.05.005 Tamang2015 Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella in pigs from conventional and organic farms and first report of S. serovar 1,4,[5],12: I: - From Korea Democratic People's Republic of Korea Observational 10340 10340 Production type Conventional vs organic production type Organic Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 20 None 13 None None None None None 53 47 None None None None None
10269 10269 10119 None 13743 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.05.005 Tamang2015 Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella in pigs from conventional and organic farms and first report of S. serovar 1,4,[5],12: I: - From Korea Democratic People's Republic of Korea Observational 10340 10340 Production type Conventional vs organic production type Organic Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 29 None 28 None None None None None 53 47 None None None None None
10270 10270 10119 None 13743 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.05.005 Tamang2015 Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella in pigs from conventional and organic farms and first report of S. serovar 1,4,[5],12: I: - From Korea Democratic People's Republic of Korea Observational 10340 10340 Production type Conventional vs organic production type Organic Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 29 None 46 None None None None None 53 47 None None None None None
10271 10271 10119 None 13743 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.05.005 Tamang2015 Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella in pigs from conventional and organic farms and first report of S. serovar 1,4,[5],12: I: - From Korea Democratic People's Republic of Korea Observational 10340 10340 Production type Conventional vs organic production type Organic Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 9 None None None None None 53 47 None None None None None
10272 10272 10154 None 8749 10.2527/jas1976.4251331x Dealy1976 Influence of bambermycins on Salmonella infection and antibiotic resistance in swine United States of America Experimental 10404 10404 Bambermycin use Both groups inoculated with an MDR strain of S. Typhimurium (2.5 x 10^11 CFU), 4.4 mg/kg bambermycins added to feed for one group (starting 5d before inoculation). Measurements for days 2-21 post-inoculation (avg of 7 sampling time points) Bambermycin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 54.00 46.00 85.00 15.00 10 10 None None None None None
10273 10273 10154 None 8749 10.2527/jas1976.4251331x Dealy1976 Influence of bambermycins on Salmonella infection and antibiotic resistance in swine United States of America Experimental 10404 10404 Bambermycin use Both groups inoculated with an MDR strain of S. Typhimurium (2.5 x 10^11 CFU), 4.4 mg/kg bambermycins added to feed for one group (starting 5d before inoculation). Measurements for days 2-21 post-inoculation (avg of 7 sampling time points) Bambermycin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 36.00 64.00 81.00 19.00 10 10 None None None None None
10274 10274 10154 None 8749 10.2527/jas1976.4251331x Dealy1976 Influence of bambermycins on Salmonella infection and antibiotic resistance in swine United States of America Experimental 10404 10404 Bambermycin use Both groups inoculated with an MDR strain of S. Typhimurium (2.5 x 10^11 CFU), 4.4 mg/kg bambermycins added to feed for one group (starting 5d before inoculation). Measurements for days 2-21 post-inoculation (avg of 7 sampling time points) Bambermycin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 15.00 85.00 59.00 41.00 10 10 None None None None None
10275 10275 10154 None 8749 10.2527/jas1976.4251331x Dealy1976 Influence of bambermycins on Salmonella infection and antibiotic resistance in swine United States of America Experimental 10404 10404 Bambermycin use Both groups inoculated with an MDR strain of S. Typhimurium (2.5 x 10^11 CFU), 4.4 mg/kg bambermycins added to feed for one group (starting 5d before inoculation). Measurements for days 2-21 post-inoculation (avg of 7 sampling time points) Bambermycin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 89.10 10.90 96.90 3.10 350 350 None None None None None
10276 10276 10154 None 8749 10.2527/jas1976.4251331x Dealy1976 Influence of bambermycins on Salmonella infection and antibiotic resistance in swine United States of America Experimental 10404 10404 Bambermycin use Both groups inoculated with an MDR strain of S. Typhimurium (2.5 x 10^11 CFU), 4.4 mg/kg bambermycins added to feed for one group (starting 5d before inoculation). Measurements for days 2-21 post-inoculation (avg of 7 sampling time points) Bambermycin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 81.80 18.20 96.00 4.00 350 350 None None None None None
10278 10278 10154 None 8749 10.2527/jas1976.4251331x Dealy1976 Influence of bambermycins on Salmonella infection and antibiotic resistance in swine United States of America Experimental 10404 10404 Bambermycin use Both groups inoculated with an MDR strain of S. Typhimurium (2.5 x 10^11 CFU), 4.4 mg/kg bambermycins added to feed for one group (starting 5d before inoculation). Measurements for days 2-21 post-inoculation (avg of 7 sampling time points) Bambermycin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 70.60 29.40 88.70 11.30 350 350 None None None None None
10279 10279 10160 None 8922 Dorr2009 Flavophospholipol: Effect on multi-drug resistant <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar typhimurium in swine United States of America Experimental 10427 10427 Flavophospholipol use Flavophospholipol (Flavomycin; Huvepharma Inc, Peachtree City, Georgia) at 4.85 g per tonne added to feed for 15 - 17 weeks. For Salmonella Typhirium Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 286 None 211 None None None None None 300 226 None None None None None
10280 10280 10160 None 8922 Dorr2009 Flavophospholipol: Effect on multi-drug resistant <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar typhimurium in swine United States of America Experimental 10430 10430 Penicillin and chlortetracycline use Penicillin and chlortetracycline, both at 11 g per tonne added to feed for 15 - 17 weeks. For Salmonella Typhirium Penicillin and chlortetracycline use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 167 None 211 None None None None None 186 226 None None None None None
10281 10281 10160 None 8922 Dorr2009 Flavophospholipol: Effect on multi-drug resistant <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar typhimurium in swine United States of America Experimental 10431 10431 Penicillin, chlortetracycline, and flavophospholipol use Penicilin and chlortetracycline, both at 11 g per tonne, plus flavophospholipol at 4.85 g per tonne added to feed for 15 - 17 weeks. For Salmonella Typhirium Penicillin, chlortetracycline, and flavophospholipol use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 155 None 211 None None None None None 180 226 None None None None None
10285 10285 10160 None 8922 Dorr2009 Flavophospholipol: Effect on multi-drug resistant <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar typhimurium in swine United States of America Experimental 10427 10427 Flavophospholipol use Flavophospholipol (Flavomycin; Huvepharma Inc, Peachtree City, Georgia) at 4.85 g per tonne added to feed for 15 - 17 weeks. For Salmonella Typhirium Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 300 None 223 None None None None None 300 226 None None None None None
10286 10286 10160 None 8922 Dorr2009 Flavophospholipol: Effect on multi-drug resistant <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar typhimurium in swine United States of America Experimental 10430 10430 Penicillin and chlortetracycline use Penicillin and chlortetracycline, both at 11 g per tonne added to feed for 15 - 17 weeks. For Salmonella Typhirium Penicillin and chlortetracycline use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 186 None 216 None None None None None 186 228 None None None None None
10287 10287 10160 None 8922 Dorr2009 Flavophospholipol: Effect on multi-drug resistant <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar typhimurium in swine United States of America Experimental 10431 10431 Penicillin, chlortetracycline, and flavophospholipol use Penicilin and chlortetracycline, both at 11 g per tonne, plus flavophospholipol at 4.85 g per tonne added to feed for 15 - 17 weeks. For Salmonella Typhirium Penicillin, chlortetracycline, and flavophospholipol use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 181 None 223 None None None None None 181 227 None None None None None
10292 10292 10160 None 8922 Dorr2009 Flavophospholipol: Effect on multi-drug resistant <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar typhimurium in swine United States of America Experimental 10427 10427 Flavophospholipol use Flavophospholipol (Flavomycin; Huvepharma Inc, Peachtree City, Georgia) at 4.85 g per tonne added to feed for 15 - 17 weeks. For Salmonella Typhirium Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 300 None 216 None None None None None 300 228 None None None None None
10293 10293 10160 None 8922 Dorr2009 Flavophospholipol: Effect on multi-drug resistant <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar typhimurium in swine United States of America Experimental 10430 10430 Penicillin and chlortetracycline use Penicillin and chlortetracycline, both at 11 g per tonne added to feed for 15 - 17 weeks. For Salmonella Typhirium Penicillin and chlortetracycline use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 186 None 216 None None None None None 186 228 None None None None None
10294 10294 10160 None 8922 Dorr2009 Flavophospholipol: Effect on multi-drug resistant <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar typhimurium in swine United States of America Experimental 10431 10431 Penicillin, chlortetracycline, and flavophospholipol use Penicilin and chlortetracycline, both at 11 g per tonne, plus flavophospholipol at 4.85 g per tonne added to feed for 15 - 17 weeks. For Salmonella Typhirium Penicillin, chlortetracycline, and flavophospholipol use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 182 None 216 None None None None None 182 228 None None None None None
10298 10298 10160 None 8922 Dorr2009 Flavophospholipol: Effect on multi-drug resistant <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar typhimurium in swine United States of America Experimental 10427 10427 Flavophospholipol use Flavophospholipol (Flavomycin; Huvepharma Inc, Peachtree City, Georgia) at 4.85 g per tonne added to feed for 15 - 17 weeks. For Salmonella Typhirium Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 294 None 215 None None None None None 300 226 None None None None None
10299 10299 10160 None 8922 Dorr2009 Flavophospholipol: Effect on multi-drug resistant <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar typhimurium in swine United States of America Experimental 10430 10430 Penicillin and chlortetracycline use Penicillin and chlortetracycline, both at 11 g per tonne added to feed for 15 - 17 weeks. For Salmonella Typhirium Penicillin and chlortetracycline use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 175 None 215 None None None None None 185 229 None None None None None
10300 10300 10160 None 8922 Dorr2009 Flavophospholipol: Effect on multi-drug resistant <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar typhimurium in swine United States of America Experimental 10431 10431 Penicillin, chlortetracycline, and flavophospholipol use Penicilin and chlortetracycline, both at 11 g per tonne, plus flavophospholipol at 4.85 g per tonne added to feed for 15 - 17 weeks. For Salmonella Typhirium Penicillin, chlortetracycline, and flavophospholipol use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 171 None 215 None None None None None 181 229 None None None None None
10304 10304 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10455 10455 In-feed antimicrobial use Antimicrobials added to weanling pig rations only In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 22.60 None 3.00 None None None None None None None None
10305 10305 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10457 10457 In-feed antimicrobial use Antimicrobials in weanling pig rations and narrow-spectrum antimicrobials in grower-finisher rations In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 22.80 None 3.00 None None None None None None None None
10306 10306 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10456 10456 In-feed antimicrobial use Antimicrobials in weanling pig rations and broad-spectrum antimicrobials in grower-finisher rations In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 49.60 None 3.00 None None None None None None None None
10307 10307 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10455 10455 In-feed antimicrobial use Antimicrobials added to weanling pig rations only In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.74 None 0.00 None None None None None None None None
10308 10308 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10457 10457 In-feed antimicrobial use Antimicrobials in weanling pig rations and narrow-spectrum antimicrobials in grower-finisher rations In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None None None None None None None None
10309 10309 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10456 10456 In-feed antimicrobial use Antimicrobials in weanling pig rations and broad-spectrum antimicrobials in grower-finisher rations In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.02 None 0.00 None None None None None None None None
10310 10310 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10455 10455 In-feed antimicrobial use Antimicrobials added to weanling pig rations only In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.40 None 1.00 None None None None None None None None
10311 10311 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10457 10457 In-feed antimicrobial use Antimicrobials in weanling pig rations and narrow-spectrum antimicrobials in grower-finisher rations In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.80 None 1.00 None None None None None None None None
10312 10312 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10456 10456 In-feed antimicrobial use Antimicrobials in weanling pig rations and broad-spectrum antimicrobials in grower-finisher rations In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.60 None 1.00 None None None None None None None None
10313 10313 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10455 10455 In-feed antimicrobial use Antimicrobials added to weanling pig rations only In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 28.50 None 7.70 None None None None None None None None
10314 10314 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10457 10457 In-feed antimicrobial use Antimicrobials in weanling pig rations and narrow-spectrum antimicrobials in grower-finisher rations In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 39.60 None 7.70 None None None None None None None None
10315 10315 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10456 10456 In-feed antimicrobial use Antimicrobials in weanling pig rations and broad-spectrum antimicrobials in grower-finisher rations In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 21.80 None 7.70 None None None None None None None None
10316 10316 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10455 10455 In-feed antimicrobial use Antimicrobials added to weanling pig rations only In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 13.90 None 11.20 None None None None None None None None
10317 10317 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10457 10457 In-feed antimicrobial use Antimicrobials in weanling pig rations and narrow-spectrum antimicrobials in grower-finisher rations In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 25.00 None 11.20 None None None None None None None None
10318 10318 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10456 10456 In-feed antimicrobial use Antimicrobials in weanling pig rations and broad-spectrum antimicrobials in grower-finisher rations In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 31.90 None 11.20 None None None None None None None None
10319 10319 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10455 10455 In-feed antimicrobial use Antimicrobials added to weanling pig rations only In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 34.00 None 22.30 None None None None None None None None
10320 10320 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10457 10457 In-feed antimicrobial use Antimicrobials in weanling pig rations and narrow-spectrum antimicrobials in grower-finisher rations In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 28.70 None 22.30 None None None None None None None None
10321 10321 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10456 10456 In-feed antimicrobial use Antimicrobials in weanling pig rations and broad-spectrum antimicrobials in grower-finisher rations In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 59.80 None 22.30 None None None None None None None None
10322 10322 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10455 10455 In-feed antimicrobial use Antimicrobials added to weanling pig rations only In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 70.00 None 41.40 None None None None None None None None
10323 10323 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10457 10457 In-feed antimicrobial use Antimicrobials in weanling pig rations and narrow-spectrum antimicrobials in grower-finisher rations In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 80.80 None 41.40 None None None None None None None None
10324 10324 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10456 10456 In-feed antimicrobial use Antimicrobials in weanling pig rations and broad-spectrum antimicrobials in grower-finisher rations In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 96.90 None 41.40 None None None None None None None None
10325 10325 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10438 10438 Any antimicrobial use Number of class-specific individual treatments (any drug) < or = 3.6 treatments/1000 pig days Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 29.00 None 14.70 None None None None None None None None
10329 10329 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10439 10439 Any antimicrobial use Number of class-specific individual treatments (any drug) > 3.6 treatments/1000 pig days Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 32.30 None 14.70 None None None None None None None None
10330 10330 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10445 10445 Any antimicrobial use Some given to weanling pigs Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 27.30 None 19.10 None None None None None None None None
10331 10331 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10444 10444 Any antimicrobial use Some given to suckling pigs Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 17.10 None 22.50 None None None None None None None None
10332 10332 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10441 10441 Any antimicrobial use Routinely given to suckling pigs Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 41.40 None 22.50 None None None None None None None None
10334 10334 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10443 10443 Any antimicrobial use Some given to nursing sows Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 25.00 None 6.30 None None None None None None None None
10335 10335 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10440 10440 Any antimicrobial use Routinely given to nursing sows Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 14.20 None 6.30 None None None None None None None None
10336 10336 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10442 10442 Any antimicrobial use Some given to dry sows Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 22.90 None 20.90 None None None None None None None None
10337 10337 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10438 10438 Any antimicrobial use Number of class-specific individual treatments (any drug) < or = 3.6 treatments/1000 pig days Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.74 None None None None None None None None
10338 10338 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10439 10439 Any antimicrobial use Number of class-specific individual treatments (any drug) > 3.6 treatments/1000 pig days Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.74 None None None None None None None None
10339 10339 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10445 10445 Any antimicrobial use Some given to weanling pigs Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None None None None None None None None
10340 10340 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10444 10444 Any antimicrobial use Some given to suckling pigs Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 17.62 None None None None None None None None
10341 10341 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10441 10441 Any antimicrobial use Routinely given to suckling pigs Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.69 None 17.62 None None None None None None None None
10342 10342 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10443 10443 Any antimicrobial use Some given to nursing sows Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.45 None None None None None None None None
10343 10343 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10440 10440 Any antimicrobial use Routinely given to nursing sows Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.45 None None None None None None None None
10344 10344 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10442 10442 Any antimicrobial use Some given to dry sows Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None None None None None None None None
10345 10345 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10438 10438 Any antimicrobial use Number of class-specific individual treatments (any drug) < or = 3.6 treatments/1000 pig days Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.70 None 0.60 None None None None None None None None
10346 10346 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10439 10439 Any antimicrobial use Number of class-specific individual treatments (any drug) > 3.6 treatments/1000 pig days Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.30 None 0.60 None None None None None None None None
10347 10347 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10445 10445 Any antimicrobial use Some given to weanling pigs Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None None None None None None None None
10348 10348 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10444 10444 Any antimicrobial use Some given to suckling pigs Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.00 None 0.00 None None None None None None None None
10349 10349 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10441 10441 Any antimicrobial use Routinely given to suckling pigs Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.10 None 0.00 None None None None None None None None
10350 10350 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10443 10443 Any antimicrobial use Some given to nursing sows Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.50 None 0.00 None None None None None None None None
10351 10351 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10440 10440 Any antimicrobial use Routinely given to nursing sows Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.10 None 0.00 None None None None None None None None
10352 10352 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10442 10442 Any antimicrobial use Some given to dry sows Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.60 None 0.60 None None None None None None None None
10353 10353 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10438 10438 Any antimicrobial use Number of class-specific individual treatments (any drug) < or = 3.6 treatments/1000 pig days Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 23.90 None 22.10 None None None None None None None None
10354 10354 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10439 10439 Any antimicrobial use Number of class-specific individual treatments (any drug) > 3.6 treatments/1000 pig days Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 21.80 None 22.10 None None None None None None None None
10355 10355 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10445 10445 Any antimicrobial use Some given to weanling pigs Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 21.80 None 27.50 None None None None None None None None
10356 10356 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10444 10444 Any antimicrobial use Some given to suckling pigs Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 17.20 None 20.10 None None None None None None None None
10357 10357 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10441 10441 Any antimicrobial use Routinely given to suckling pigs Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 32.20 None 20.10 None None None None None None None None
10358 10358 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10443 10443 Any antimicrobial use Some given to nursing sows Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 31.30 None 4.70 None None None None None None None None
10359 10359 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10440 10440 Any antimicrobial use Routinely given to nursing sows Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 12.30 None 4.70 None None None None None None None None
10360 10360 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10442 10442 Any antimicrobial use Some given to dry sows Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 20.10 None 34.90 None None None None None None None None
10361 10361 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10438 10438 Any antimicrobial use Number of class-specific individual treatments (any drug) < or = 3.6 treatments/1000 pig days Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 25.00 None 11.60 None None None None None None None None
10362 10362 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10439 10439 Any antimicrobial use Number of class-specific individual treatments (any drug) > 3.6 treatments/1000 pig days Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 20.20 None 11.60 None None None None None None None None
10363 10363 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10445 10445 Any antimicrobial use Some given to weanling pigs Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 18.90 None 22.90 None None None None None None None None
10364 10364 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10444 10444 Any antimicrobial use Some given to suckling pigs Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 14.10 None 21.70 None None None None None None None None
10365 10365 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10441 10441 Any antimicrobial use Routinely given to suckling pigs Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 22.90 None 21.70 None None None None None None None None
10366 10366 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10443 10443 Any antimicrobial use Some given to nursing sows Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 22.00 None 30.90 None None None None None None None None
10367 10367 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10440 10440 Any antimicrobial use Routinely given to nursing sows Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 14.20 None 30.90 None None None None None None None None
10368 10368 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10442 10442 Any antimicrobial use Some given to dry sows Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 14.30 None 23.90 None None None None None None None None
10369 10369 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10438 10438 Any antimicrobial use Number of class-specific individual treatments (any drug) < or = 3.6 treatments/1000 pig days Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 39.70 None 19.70 None None None None None None None None
10370 10370 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10439 10439 Any antimicrobial use Number of class-specific individual treatments (any drug) > 3.6 treatments/1000 pig days Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 33.90 None 19.70 None None None None None None None None
10371 10371 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10445 10445 Any antimicrobial use Some given to weanling pigs Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 28.50 None 51.60 None None None None None None None None
10372 10372 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10444 10444 Any antimicrobial use Some given to suckling pigs Any antimicrobial use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 29.80 None 40.00 None None None None None None None None
10397 10397 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10462 10462 Number of sows and unbred gilts 91 - 120 sows and unbred gilts 91 - 120 sows and unbred gilts 31 - 90 sows and unbred gilts Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.80 None 0.90 None None None None None None None None
10398 10398 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10461 10461 Number of sows and unbred gilts 121 - 150 sows and unbred gilts 121 - 150 sows and unbred gilts 31 - 90 sows and unbred gilts Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.30 None 0.90 None None None None None None None None
10399 10399 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10460 10460 Number of sows and unbred gilts > 150 sows and unbred gilts > 150 sows and unbred gilts 31 - 90 sows and unbred gilts Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.50 None 0.90 None None None None None None None None
10400 10400 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10465 10465 Type of grower-finisher housing Barn attached Barn attached Bank barn Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.80 None 0.20 None None None None None None None None
10401 10401 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10466 10466 Type of grower-finisher housing Barn separated Barn attached Bank barn Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.40 None 0.20 None None None None None None None None
10402 10402 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10453 10453 Herd policy on new animal introductions Purchased boars only vs boars and gilts Purchased boars only Purchased boars and gilts Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.80 None 0.40 None None None None None None None None
10403 10403 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10462 10462 Number of sows and unbred gilts 91 - 120 sows and unbred gilts 91 - 120 sows and unbred gilts 31 - 90 sows and unbred gilts Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 14.40 None 38.90 None None None None None None None None
10404 10404 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10461 10461 Number of sows and unbred gilts 121 - 150 sows and unbred gilts 121 - 150 sows and unbred gilts 31 - 90 sows and unbred gilts Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 34.20 None 38.90 None None None None None None None None
10406 10406 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10460 10460 Number of sows and unbred gilts > 150 sows and unbred gilts > 150 sows and unbred gilts 31 - 90 sows and unbred gilts Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 19.50 None 38.90 None None None None None None None None
10407 10407 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10465 10465 Type of grower-finisher housing Barn attached Barn attached Bank barn Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 19.80 None 33.00 None None None None None None None None
10408 10408 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10466 10466 Type of grower-finisher housing Barn separated Barn attached Bank barn Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 23.90 None 33.00 None None None None None None None None
10409 10409 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10453 10453 Herd policy on new animal introductions Purchased boars only vs boars and gilts Purchased boars only Purchased boars and gilts Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 21.00 None 26.00 None None None None None None None None
10410 10410 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10462 10462 Number of sows and unbred gilts 91 - 120 sows and unbred gilts 91 - 120 sows and unbred gilts 31 - 90 sows and unbred gilts Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 13.00 None 43.70 None None None None None None None None
10411 10411 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10461 10461 Number of sows and unbred gilts 121 - 150 sows and unbred gilts 121 - 150 sows and unbred gilts 31 - 90 sows and unbred gilts Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 26.50 None 43.70 None None None None None None None None
10412 10412 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10460 10460 Number of sows and unbred gilts > 150 sows and unbred gilts > 150 sows and unbred gilts 31 - 90 sows and unbred gilts Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 11.80 None 43.70 None None None None None None None None
10413 10413 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10465 10465 Type of grower-finisher housing Barn attached Barn attached Bank barn Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 21.40 None 32.30 None None None None None None None None
10414 10414 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10466 10466 Type of grower-finisher housing Barn separated Barn attached Bank barn Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 18.70 None 32.30 None None None None None None None None
10415 10415 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10453 10453 Herd policy on new animal introductions Purchased boars only vs boars and gilts Purchased boars only Purchased boars and gilts Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 22.00 None 18.00 None None None None None None None None
10416 10416 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10462 10462 Number of sows and unbred gilts 91 - 120 sows and unbred gilts 91 - 120 sows and unbred gilts 31 - 90 sows and unbred gilts Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 28.70 None 46.00 None None None None None None None None
10417 10417 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10461 10461 Number of sows and unbred gilts 121 - 150 sows and unbred gilts 121 - 150 sows and unbred gilts 31 - 90 sows and unbred gilts Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 42.90 None 46.00 None None None None None None None None
10418 10418 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10460 10460 Number of sows and unbred gilts > 150 sows and unbred gilts > 150 sows and unbred gilts 31 - 90 sows and unbred gilts Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 29.80 None 46.00 None None None None None None None None
10419 10419 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10465 10465 Type of grower-finisher housing Barn attached Barn attached Bank barn Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 34.00 None 39.00 None None None None None None None None
10420 10420 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10466 10466 Type of grower-finisher housing Barn separated Barn attached Bank barn Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 28.30 None 39.00 None None None None None None None None
10421 10421 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10453 10453 Herd policy on new animal introductions Purchased boars only vs boars and gilts Purchased boars only Purchased boars and gilts Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 32.50 None 37.50 None None None None None None None None
10422 10422 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10462 10462 Number of sows and unbred gilts 91 - 120 sows and unbred gilts 91 - 120 sows and unbred gilts 31 - 90 sows and unbred gilts Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 78.10 None 82.40 None None None None None None None None
10423 10423 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10461 10461 Number of sows and unbred gilts 121 - 150 sows and unbred gilts 121 - 150 sows and unbred gilts 31 - 90 sows and unbred gilts Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 81.90 None 82.40 None None None None None None None None
10424 10424 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10460 10460 Number of sows and unbred gilts > 150 sows and unbred gilts > 150 sows and unbred gilts 31 - 90 sows and unbred gilts Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 68.80 None 82.40 None None None None None None None None
10425 10425 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10465 10465 Type of grower-finisher housing Barn attached Barn attached Bank barn Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 70.20 None 89.90 None None None None None None None None
10426 10426 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10466 10466 Type of grower-finisher housing Barn separated Barn attached Bank barn Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 74.00 None 89.90 None None None None None None None None
10427 10427 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10453 10453 Herd policy on new animal introductions Purchased boars only vs boars and gilts Purchased boars only Purchased boars and gilts Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 75.00 None 80.00 None None None None None None None None
10428 10428 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10437 10437 Antimicrobial-specific treatments not specific to class of pig Used for group &/or individual pig treatments Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 22.90 None 12.70 None None None None None None None None
10429 10429 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10435 10435 Antimicrobial-specific treatments not specific to class of pig Added to any ration or water Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 32.90 None 12.70 None None None None None None None None
10430 10430 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10436 10436 Antimicrobial-specific treatments not specific to class of pig Individual treatment of any class of pig Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 22.90 None 12.70 None None None None None None None None
10431 10431 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10449 10449 Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to class of pig Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to grower-finishers Antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 51.50 None 21.90 None None None None None None None None
10432 10432 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10452 10452 Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to class of pig Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to weanling pigs Antimicrobial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 32.90 None 19.90 None None None None None None None None
10433 10433 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10451 10451 Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to class of pig Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to suckling piglets Antimicrobial use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 29.00 None 19.90 None None None None None None None None
10434 10434 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10450 10450 Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to class of pig Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to nursing sows Antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 63.10 None 20.90 None None None None None None None None
10435 10435 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10437 10437 Antimicrobial-specific treatments not specific to class of pig Used for group &/or individual pig treatments Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.74 None 0.00 None None None None None None None None
10436 10436 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10435 10435 Antimicrobial-specific treatments not specific to class of pig Added to any ration or water Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.74 None 0.00 None None None None None None None None
10439 10439 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10452 10452 Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to class of pig Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to weanling pigs Antimicrobial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.47 None 0.00 None None None None None None None None
10440 10440 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10451 10451 Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to class of pig Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to suckling piglets Antimicrobial use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None None None None None None None None
10442 10442 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10437 10437 Antimicrobial-specific treatments not specific to class of pig Used for group &/or individual pig treatments Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.02 None 0.08 None None None None None None None None
10444 10444 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10436 10436 Antimicrobial-specific treatments not specific to class of pig Individual treatment of any class of pig Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.02 None 0.08 None None None None None None None None
10446 10446 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10437 10437 Antimicrobial-specific treatments not specific to class of pig Used for group &/or individual pig treatments Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 34.80 None 18.60 None None None None None None None None
10447 10447 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10435 10435 Antimicrobial-specific treatments not specific to class of pig Added to any ration or water Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 34.80 None 18.60 None None None None None None None None
10448 10448 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10436 10436 Antimicrobial-specific treatments not specific to class of pig Individual treatment of any class of pig Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 33.70 None 18.60 None None None None None None None None
10449 10449 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10449 10449 Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to class of pig Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to grower-finishers Antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 28.30 None 21.80 None None None None None None None None
10450 10450 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10452 10452 Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to class of pig Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to weanling pigs Antimicrobial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 38.90 None 20.10 None None None None None None None None
10451 10451 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10451 10451 Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to class of pig Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to suckling piglets Antimicrobial use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 31.50 None 21.80 None None None None None None None None
10452 10452 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10437 10437 Antimicrobial-specific treatments not specific to class of pig Used for group &/or individual pig treatments Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 22.10 None 21.10 None None None None None None None None
10453 10453 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10435 10435 Antimicrobial-specific treatments not specific to class of pig Added to any ration or water Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 19.60 None 21.10 None None None None None None None None
10454 10454 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10436 10436 Antimicrobial-specific treatments not specific to class of pig Individual treatment of any class of pig Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 24.00 None 21.10 None None None None None None None None
10456 10456 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10452 10452 Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to class of pig Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to weanling pigs Antimicrobial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 34.50 None 19.80 None None None None None None None None
10457 10457 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10451 10451 Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to class of pig Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to suckling piglets Antimicrobial use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 11.30 None 22.00 None None None None None None None None
10458 10458 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10437 10437 Antimicrobial-specific treatments not specific to class of pig Used for group &/or individual pig treatments Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 39.40 None 16.50 None None None None None None None None
10459 10459 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10435 10435 Antimicrobial-specific treatments not specific to class of pig Added to any ration or water Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 39.70 None 16.50 None None None None None None None None
10460 10460 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10436 10436 Antimicrobial-specific treatments not specific to class of pig Individual treatment of any class of pig Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 39.90 None 16.50 None None None None None None None None
10461 10461 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10449 10449 Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to class of pig Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to grower-finishers Antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 53.50 None 34.00 None None None None None None None None
10462 10462 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10452 10452 Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to class of pig Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to weanling pigs Antimicrobial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 41.20 None 28.80 None None None None None None None None
10463 10463 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10451 10451 Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to class of pig Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to suckling piglets Antimicrobial use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 41.30 None 29.00 None None None None None None None None
10464 10464 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10450 10450 Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to class of pig Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to nursing sows Antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 39.60 None 35.40 None None None None None None None None
10465 10465 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10437 10437 Antimicrobial-specific treatments not specific to class of pig Used for group &/or individual pig treatments Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 80.70 None 66.00 None None None None None None None None
10466 10466 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10435 10435 Antimicrobial-specific treatments not specific to class of pig Added to any ration or water Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 85.90 None 66.00 None None None None None None None None
10467 10467 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10436 10436 Antimicrobial-specific treatments not specific to class of pig Individual treatment of any class of pig Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 82.80 None 66.00 None None None None None None None None
10469 10469 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10448 10448 Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to class of pig Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to grower-finisher pigs Antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 96.90 None 68.80 None None None None None None None None
10470 10470 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10452 10452 Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to class of pig Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to weanling pigs Antimicrobial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 94.00 None 64.50 None None None None None None None None
10471 10471 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10451 10451 Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to class of pig Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to suckling piglets Antimicrobial use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 82.30 None 74.20 None None None None None None None None
10472 10472 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10450 10450 Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to class of pig Group antimicrobial specific treatments specific to nursing sows Antimicrobial use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 80.60 None 78.00 None None None None None None None None
10473 10473 10169 None 9004 10.4315/0362-028x-64.12.2067 Edrington2001 Evaluation of subtherapeutic use of the antibiotics apramycin and carbadox on the prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella infection in swine United States of America Experimental 10493 10493 Apramycin use Apramycin in drinking water and creep feed for 21 days Apramycin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides apramycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 21 None 31 None None None None None 89 223 None None None None None
10474 10474 10185 None 9279 10.1128/aac.00177-15 Fleury2015 Impact of ceftiofur injection on gut microbiota and Escherichia coli resistance in pigs France Experimental 10506 10506 Ceftiofur use 28 days after single intramuscular injection of a vegetable oil-based suspension of ceftiofur crystalline free acid (Naxcel; Pfizer) at the recommended dose of 5 mg/kg of body weight. All E. coli isolates are cefotaxime-resistant. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Antibiotics rifampicin None Escherichia coli False None False 33 None 19 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
10475 10475 10185 None 9279 10.1128/aac.00177-15 Fleury2015 Impact of ceftiofur injection on gut microbiota and Escherichia coli resistance in pigs France Experimental 10507 10507 Ceftiofur use 28 days after single intramuscular injection of a vegetable oil-based suspension of ceftiofur crystalline free acid (Naxcel; Pfizer) at the recommended dose of 5 mg/kg of body weight. AMR+ = # samples positive for bla CTX M1 gene. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 8 8 None None None None None
10476 10476 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10514 10514 Probiotic use ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 4 None None None None None 20 16 None None None None None
10477 10477 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10512 10512 Probiotic and buckwheat bran use 3% buckwheat bran in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and buckwheat bran use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 4 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10478 10478 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10513 10513 Probiotic and mix of herbals used 1.5% composition of herbals (St. John's wort, nettle, plaintain leaves) in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old pigs received 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, & 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and mixed herbals used No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 4 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10479 10479 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10514 10514 Probiotic use ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 2 None None None None None 20 16 None None None None None
10480 10480 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10512 10512 Probiotic and buckwheat bran use 3% buckwheat bran in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and buckwheat bran use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10481 10481 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10513 10513 Probiotic and mix of herbals used 1.5% composition of herbals (St. John's wort, nettle, plaintain leaves) in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old pigs received 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, & 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and mixed herbals used No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10482 10482 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10514 10514 Probiotic use ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 20 16 None None None None None
10483 10483 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10512 10512 Probiotic and buckwheat bran use 3% buckwheat bran in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and buckwheat bran use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 1 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10484 10484 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10513 10513 Probiotic and mix of herbals used 1.5% composition of herbals (St. John's wort, nettle, plaintain leaves) in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old pigs received 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, & 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and mixed herbals used No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 1 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10485 10485 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10514 10514 Probiotic use ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 20 16 None None None None None
10486 10486 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10512 10512 Probiotic and buckwheat bran use 3% buckwheat bran in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and buckwheat bran use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10487 10487 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10513 10513 Probiotic and mix of herbals used 1.5% composition of herbals (St. John's wort, nettle, plaintain leaves) in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old pigs received 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, & 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and mixed herbals used No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10488 10488 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10514 10514 Probiotic use ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 16 None None None None None
10489 10489 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10512 10512 Probiotic and buckwheat bran use 3% buckwheat bran in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and buckwheat bran use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10490 10490 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10513 10513 Probiotic and mix of herbals used 1.5% composition of herbals (St. John's wort, nettle, plaintain leaves) in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old pigs received 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, & 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and mixed herbals used No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10491 10491 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10514 10514 Probiotic use ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 16 None None None None None
10492 10492 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10512 10512 Probiotic and buckwheat bran use 3% buckwheat bran in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and buckwheat bran use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10493 10493 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10513 10513 Probiotic and mix of herbals used 1.5% composition of herbals (St. John's wort, nettle, plaintain leaves) in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old pigs received 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, & 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and mixed herbals used No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10494 10494 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10514 10514 Probiotic use ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 10 None 5 None None None None None 20 16 None None None None None
10495 10495 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10512 10512 Probiotic and buckwheat bran use 3% buckwheat bran in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and buckwheat bran use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 5 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10496 10496 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10513 10513 Probiotic and mix of herbals used 1.5% composition of herbals (St. John's wort, nettle, plaintain leaves) in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old pigs received 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, & 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and mixed herbals used No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 7 None 5 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10498 10498 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10514 10514 Probiotic use ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 16 None None None None None
10499 10499 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10512 10512 Probiotic and buckwheat bran use 3% buckwheat bran in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and buckwheat bran use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10500 10500 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10513 10513 Probiotic and mix of herbals used 1.5% composition of herbals (St. John's wort, nettle, plaintain leaves) in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old pigs received 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, & 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and mixed herbals used No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10501 10501 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10514 10514 Probiotic use ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 10 None 4 None None None None None 20 16 None None None None None
10502 10502 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10512 10512 Probiotic and buckwheat bran use 3% buckwheat bran in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and buckwheat bran use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 7 None 4 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10503 10503 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10513 10513 Probiotic and mix of herbals used 1.5% composition of herbals (St. John's wort, nettle, plaintain leaves) in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old pigs received 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, & 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and mixed herbals used No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 4 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10504 10504 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10514 10514 Probiotic use ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 4 None None None None None 20 16 None None None None None
10505 10505 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10512 10512 Probiotic and buckwheat bran use 3% buckwheat bran in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and buckwheat bran use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 3 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10506 10506 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10513 10513 Probiotic and mix of herbals used 1.5% composition of herbals (St. John's wort, nettle, plaintain leaves) in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old pigs received 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, & 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and mixed herbals used No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 3 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10508 10508 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10514 10514 Probiotic use ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 6 None None None None None 20 16 None None None None None
10509 10509 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10512 10512 Probiotic and buckwheat bran use 3% buckwheat bran in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and buckwheat bran use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 6 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10510 10510 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10513 10513 Probiotic and mix of herbals used 1.5% composition of herbals (St. John's wort, nettle, plaintain leaves) in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old pigs received 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, & 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and mixed herbals used No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 6 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10511 10511 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10514 10514 Probiotic use ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 16 None None None None None
10512 10512 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10512 10512 Probiotic and buckwheat bran use 3% buckwheat bran in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water depending on the age of piglets: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old ones received the concentration of 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, and 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and buckwheat bran use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10513 10513 10191 None 9375 10.22616/rrd.23.2017.037 Galina2017 Effect of probiotics and herbals on health and shedding of resistant Escherichia coli in piglets Latvia Experimental 10513 10513 Probiotic and mix of herbals used 1.5% composition of herbals (St. John's wort, nettle, plaintain leaves) in feed + ’ProbioHelp’ added to drinking water: 14, 28, 35, 42 and 49 days old pigs received 1%, 0.75%, 0.45%, 0.34%, & 0.32%, respectively. Tested 56 day-old piglets. Probiotic and mixed herbals used No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 16 16 None None None None None
10516 10516 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10516 10516 Production type Conventional vs antimicrobial-free farms. Isolates taken on-farm. Antimicrobial-free farm Conventional farm Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 35 None 30 None None None None None 282 85 None None None None None
10517 10517 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10516 10516 Production type Conventional vs antimicrobial-free farms. Isolates taken on-farm. Antimicrobial-free farm Conventional farm Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False 2 None 12 None None None None None 282 85 None None None None None
10518 10518 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10516 10516 Production type Conventional vs antimicrobial-free farms. Isolates taken on-farm. Antimicrobial-free farm Conventional farm Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 282 85 None None None None None
10520 10520 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10516 10516 Production type Conventional vs antimicrobial-free farms. Isolates taken on-farm. Antimicrobial-free farm Conventional farm Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False 30 None 22 None None None None None 282 85 None None None None None
10521 10521 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10516 10516 Production type Conventional vs antimicrobial-free farms. Isolates taken on-farm. Antimicrobial-free farm Conventional farm Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 5 None None None None None 282 85 None None None None None
10522 10522 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10516 10516 Production type Conventional vs antimicrobial-free farms. Isolates taken on-farm. Antimicrobial-free farm Conventional farm Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 282 85 None None None None None
10523 10523 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10516 10516 Production type Conventional vs antimicrobial-free farms. Isolates taken on-farm. Antimicrobial-free farm Conventional farm Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 4 None 16 None None None None None 282 85 None None None None None
10524 10524 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10516 10516 Production type Conventional vs antimicrobial-free farms. Isolates taken on-farm. Antimicrobial-free farm Conventional farm Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 102 None 73 None None None None None 282 85 None None None None None
10525 10525 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10516 10516 Production type Conventional vs antimicrobial-free farms. Isolates taken on-farm. Antimicrobial-free farm Conventional farm Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 249 None 79 None None None None None 282 85 None None None None None
10526 10526 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10516 10516 Production type Conventional vs antimicrobial-free farms. Isolates taken on-farm. Antimicrobial-free farm Conventional farm Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella spp. False None False 85 None 55 None None None None None 282 85 None None None None None
10532 10532 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10524 10524 Duration of antimicrobial use Long- vs short-term use: Long-term use = antimicrobials were used in-feed for more than 10 days after pigs were weaned. Short-term use farms = antimicrobial use in-feed only occurred up to 10 days post-weaning at the latest. Long-term antimicrobial use Short-term antimicrobial use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.43 1.69 3.51 <0.0001 None
10533 10533 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10520 10520 Beta-lactam use Any beta-lactam use within the 6 months prior to sampling. Beta-lactam use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.65 0.40 1.07 0.091 None
10535 10535 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10527 10527 Trimethoprim-sulphonamide use Any trimethoprim-sulphonamide use within the 6 months prior to sampling. Trimethoprim-sulphonamide use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.35 1.47 3.77 0.0006 None
10536 10536 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10525 10525 Tetracycline use Any tetracycline use within the 6 months prior to sampling. Tetracycline use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.49 0.96 2.32 0.077 None
10537 10537 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10519 10519 Antimicrobial use Other antimicrobial use other than beta-lactam, aminoglycoside, trimethoprim-sulphonamide, or tetracycline within the 6 months prior to sampling. Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.02 0.64 1.63 0.9261 None
10538 10538 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10524 10524 Duration of antimicrobial use Long- vs short-term use: Long-term use = antimicrobials were used in-feed for more than 10 days after pigs were weaned. Short-term use farms = antimicrobial use in-feed only occurred up to 10 days post-weaning at the latest. Long-term antimicrobial use Short-term antimicrobial use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.11 0.72 1.71 0.4097 None
10539 10539 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10518 10518 Aminoglycoside use Any aminoglycoside use within the 6 months prior to sampling. Aminoglycoside use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.52 0.23 1.17 0.1149 None
10540 10540 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10527 10527 Trimethoprim-sulphonamide use Any trimethoprim-sulphonamide use within the 6 months prior to sampling. Trimethoprim-sulphonamide use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.04 0.56 1.92 0.9025 None
10543 10543 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10519 10519 Antimicrobial use Other antimicrobial use other than beta-lactam, aminoglycoside, trimethoprim-sulphonamide, or tetracycline within the 6 months prior to sampling. Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.96 1.20 3.19 0.0073 None
10544 10544 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10524 10524 Duration of antimicrobial use Long- vs short-term use: Long-term use = antimicrobials were used in-feed for more than 10 days after pigs were weaned. Short-term use farms = antimicrobial use in-feed only occurred up to 10 days post-weaning at the latest. Long-term antimicrobial use Short-term antimicrobial use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.72 0.38 1.54 0.6303 None
10545 10545 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10518 10518 Aminoglycoside use Any aminoglycoside use within the 6 months prior to sampling. Aminoglycoside use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.33 1.50 7.67 0.0047 None
10546 10546 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10526 10526 Tetracycline use Any tetracycline use within the 6 months prior to sampling. Tetracycline use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.21 1.21 4.06 0.01 None
10548 10548 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10527 10527 Trimethoprim-sulphonamide use Any trimethoprim-sulphonamide use within the 6 months prior to sampling. Trimethoprim-sulphonamide use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.57 1.59 4.15 0.0001 None
10549 10549 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10525 10525 Tetracycline use Any tetracycline use within the 6 months prior to sampling. Tetracycline use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.24 1.41 3.54 0.0007 None
10550 10550 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10519 10519 Antimicrobial use Other antimicrobial use other than beta-lactam, aminoglycoside, trimethoprim-sulphonamide, or tetracycline within the 6 months prior to sampling. Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.42 0.93 2.18 0.1047 None
10551 10551 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10524 10524 Duration of antimicrobial use Long- vs short-term use: Long-term use = antimicrobials were used in-feed for more than 10 days after pigs were weaned. Short-term use farms = antimicrobial use in-feed only occurred up to 10 days post-weaning at the latest. Long-term antimicrobial use Short-term antimicrobial use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.37 0.97 1.95 0.0771 None
10552 10552 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10518 10518 Aminoglycoside use Any aminoglycoside use within the 6 months prior to sampling. Aminoglycoside use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.91 0.52 1.58 0.7316 None
10553 10553 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10527 10527 Trimethoprim-sulphonamide use Any trimethoprim-sulphonamide use within the 6 months prior to sampling. Trimethoprim-sulphonamide use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.18 2.40 7.29 <0.0001 None
10554 10554 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10526 10526 Tetracycline use Any tetracycline use within the 6 months prior to sampling. Tetracycline use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.02 1.31 3.13 0.0015 None
10555 10555 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10520 10520 Beta-lactam use Any beta-lactam use within the 6 months prior to sampling. Beta-lactam use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.48 0.28 0.84 0.0098 None
10556 10556 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10518 10518 Aminoglycoside use Any aminoglycoside use within the 6 months prior to sampling. Aminoglycoside use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.87 0.49 1.55 0.6391 None
10557 10557 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10527 10527 Trimethoprim-sulphonamide use Any trimethoprim-sulphonamide use within the 6 months prior to sampling. Trimethoprim-sulphonamide use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.92 1.73 4.94 <0.0001 None
10558 10558 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10526 10526 Tetracycline use Any tetracycline use within the 6 months prior to sampling. Tetracycline use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.24 0.76 1.99 0.3833 None
10559 10559 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10519 10519 Antimicrobial use Other antimicrobial use other than beta-lactam, aminoglycoside, trimethoprim-sulphonamide, or tetracycline within the 6 months prior to sampling. Antimicrobial use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.08 0.68 1.74 0.7387 None
10560 10560 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10543 10543 Tetracycline use Any tetracycline use within the 6 months prior to collection Tetracycline use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 24 7 78 103 None None None None 66 356 None None None None None
10561 10561 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10543 10543 Tetracycline use Any tetracycline use within the 6 months prior to collection Tetracycline use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides dihydrostreptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 46 7 157 103 None None None None 66 356 None None None None None
10562 10562 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10543 10543 Tetracycline use Any tetracycline use within the 6 months prior to collection Tetracycline use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 55 7 218 103 None None None None 66 356 None None None None None
10563 10563 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10543 10543 Tetracycline use Any tetracycline use within the 6 months prior to collection Tetracycline use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False 16 7 51 103 None None None None 66 356 None None None None None
10564 10564 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10543 10543 Tetracycline use Any tetracycline use within the 6 months prior to collection Tetracycline use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 23 7 77 103 None None None None 66 356 None None None None None
10566 10566 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10085 10085 Ceftiofur use Piglets were subjected to parenteral administration of a sub-therapeutic dosage of ceftiofur (Naxcel) at 0.5 mg/kg BW (body weight) parenterally once daily during a three days’ treatment period. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column CTX-M-1 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 6.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10567 10567 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10085 10085 Ceftiofur use Piglets were subjected to parenteral administration of a sub-therapeutic dosage of ceftiofur (Naxcel) at 0.5 mg/kg BW (body weight) parenterally once daily during a three days’ treatment period. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column CTX-M-2 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10568 10568 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10085 10085 Ceftiofur use Piglets were subjected to parenteral administration of a sub-therapeutic dosage of ceftiofur (Naxcel) at 0.5 mg/kg BW (body weight) parenterally once daily during a three days’ treatment period. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column CTX-M-9 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 35.00 None 43.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10569 10569 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10086 10086 Ceftiofur use Treated parenterally with a therapeutic dosage of ceftiofur (Naxcel) at 5 mg/kg BW (body weight) once a day for 3 days by intramuscular injection. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column CTX-M-1 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 15.00 None 6.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10570 10570 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10086 10086 Ceftiofur use Treated parenterally with a therapeutic dosage of ceftiofur (Naxcel) at 5 mg/kg BW (body weight) once a day for 3 days by intramuscular injection. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column CTX-M-2 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10571 10571 10039 None 11229 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.010 Lin2017 Effect of ceftiofur and enrofloxacin on E. coli sub-population in pig gastrointestinal tract China Experimental 10086 10086 Ceftiofur use Treated parenterally with a therapeutic dosage of ceftiofur (Naxcel) at 5 mg/kg BW (body weight) once a day for 3 days by intramuscular injection. Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column CTX-M-9 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 24.00 None 43.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
10574 10574 10040 None 11250 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1978.tb00801.x Linton1978 Fluctuations in Escherichia coli O-serotypes in Pigs Throughout Life in the Presence and Absence of Antibiotic Treatment United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10089 10089 Tetracycline use Two series of oral therapeutic doses of tetracycline given. Tetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 36.50 None 26.80 None 998 529 None None None None None
10575 10575 10040 None 11250 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1978.tb00801.x Linton1978 Fluctuations in Escherichia coli O-serotypes in Pigs Throughout Life in the Presence and Absence of Antibiotic Treatment United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10089 10089 Tetracycline use Two series of oral therapeutic doses of tetracycline given. Tetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 99.20 None 85.40 None 998 529 None None None None None
10577 10577 10069 None 11884 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01023.x Moro2000 Effects of heat stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10189 10189 Heat stress exposure Exposed to 34 C (heat stress) and 65% relative humidity for 24 h Heat stress exposure No heat stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 25.00 5.00 5.00 20.00 100 100 None None None None None
10578 10578 10069 None 11884 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01023.x Moro2000 Effects of heat stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10189 10189 Heat stress exposure Exposed to 34 C (heat stress) and 65% relative humidity for 24 h Heat stress exposure No heat stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 40.00 5.00 0.00 20.00 100 100 None None None None None
10581 10581 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10343 10343 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at finishing farm. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 0 192 24 None None None None 1 216 None None None None None
10582 10582 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10343 10343 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at finishing farm. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 0 54 24 None None None None 1 216 None None None None None
10583 10583 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10343 10343 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at finishing farm. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 0 38 24 None None None None 1 216 None None None None None
10584 10584 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10343 10343 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at finishing farm. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 0 31 24 None None None None 1 216 None None None None None
10585 10585 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10343 10343 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at finishing farm. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 0 2 24 None None None None 1 216 None None None None None
10586 10586 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10343 10343 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at finishing farm. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 0 0 24 None None None None 1 216 None None None None None
10587 10587 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10343 10343 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at finishing farm. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 0 1 24 None None None None 1 216 None None None None None
10588 10588 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10343 10343 Antimicrobial-free production system type Intensive (indoor) vs extensive (outdoor) production system type. Indoor = single pen (space of 2.4 ft^2/pig at nursery and 7.4 ft^2/pig at finishing). Outdoor = uncovered barricaded area. Isolates taken at finishing farm. Outdoor Indoor Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 0 30 24 None None None None 1 216 None None None None None
10589 10589 10127 None 14111 10.1089/fpd.2008.0152 Vieira2009 Association between tetracycline consumption and tetracycline resistance in Escherichia coli from healthy Danish slaughter pigs. Denmark Observational 10362 10362 Herd size Large vs small herd size. Large = 1001 - 3000 slaughter pigs in the herd in a year. Small = 1 - 200. Large herd size Small herd size Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 64 138 15 11 None None None None 202 26 None None None None None
10590 10590 10127 None 14111 10.1089/fpd.2008.0152 Vieira2009 Association between tetracycline consumption and tetracycline resistance in Escherichia coli from healthy Danish slaughter pigs. Denmark Observational 10363 10363 Herd size Largest vs small herd size. Largest = > 3000 slaughter pigs in the herd in a year. Small = 1 - 200. Largest = > 3000 slaughter pigs in the herd in a year. Largest herd size Small herd size Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 94 198 15 11 None None None None 292 26 None None None None None
10591 10591 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10381 10381 Chlortetracycline + Prebiotic + Probiotic use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10592 10592 10144 None 8467 10.1371/journal.pone.0191660 Ciesinski2018 High dietary zinc feeding promotes persistence of multi-resistant E. coli in the swine gut Germany Experimental 10396 10396 Zinc use Corn starch in feed was partially replaced by analytical grade zinc oxide: 72 mg zinc/kg diet (control) & 2103 mg/kg (zinc group). Multi-resistant isolates (resistant to at least 3 antimicrobials) taken from feces of pigs at 52 days of age. Zinc use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 68.90 None 95.30 None 100 100 None None None None None
10593 10593 10144 None 8467 10.1371/journal.pone.0191660 Ciesinski2018 High dietary zinc feeding promotes persistence of multi-resistant E. coli in the swine gut Germany Experimental 10396 10396 Zinc use Corn starch in feed was partially replaced by analytical grade zinc oxide: 72 mg zinc/kg diet (control) & 2103 mg/kg (zinc group). Multi-resistant isolates (resistant to at least 3 antimicrobials) taken from feces of pigs at 52 days of age. Zinc use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
10594 10594 10144 None 8467 10.1371/journal.pone.0191660 Ciesinski2018 High dietary zinc feeding promotes persistence of multi-resistant E. coli in the swine gut Germany Experimental 10396 10396 Zinc use Corn starch in feed was partially replaced by analytical grade zinc oxide: 72 mg zinc/kg diet (control) & 2103 mg/kg (zinc group). Multi-resistant isolates (resistant to at least 3 antimicrobials) taken from feces of pigs at 52 days of age. Zinc use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 73.30 None 33.30 None 100 100 None None None None None
10595 10595 10144 None 8467 10.1371/journal.pone.0191660 Ciesinski2018 High dietary zinc feeding promotes persistence of multi-resistant E. coli in the swine gut Germany Experimental 10396 10396 Zinc use Corn starch in feed was partially replaced by analytical grade zinc oxide: 72 mg zinc/kg diet (control) & 2103 mg/kg (zinc group). Multi-resistant isolates (resistant to at least 3 antimicrobials) taken from feces of pigs at 52 days of age. Zinc use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
10597 10597 10154 None 8749 10.2527/jas1976.4251331x Dealy1976 Influence of bambermycins on Salmonella infection and antibiotic resistance in swine United States of America Experimental 10404 10404 Bambermycin use Both groups inoculated with an MDR strain of S. Typhimurium (2.5 x 10^11 CFU), 4.4 mg/kg bambermycins added to feed for one group (starting 5d before inoculation). Measurements for days 2-21 post-inoculation (avg of 7 sampling time points) Bambermycin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 72.00 28.00 97.00 3.00 10 10 None None None None None
10598 10598 10154 None 8749 10.2527/jas1976.4251331x Dealy1976 Influence of bambermycins on Salmonella infection and antibiotic resistance in swine United States of America Experimental 10404 10404 Bambermycin use Both groups inoculated with an MDR strain of S. Typhimurium (2.5 x 10^11 CFU), 4.4 mg/kg bambermycins added to feed for one group (starting 5d before inoculation). Measurements for days 2-21 post-inoculation (avg of 7 sampling time points) Bambermycin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 94.70 5.30 99.75 0.25 350 350 None None None None None
10604 10604 10160 None 8922 Dorr2009 Flavophospholipol: Effect on multi-drug resistant <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar typhimurium in swine United States of America Experimental 10429 10429 Flavophospholipol use Flavophospholipol (Flavomycin; Huvepharma Inc, Peachtree City, Georgia) at 4.85 g per tonne added to feed for 15 - 17 weeks. For Salmonella Typhirium strain DT 193. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.05 0.00 0.91 < 0.05 None
10605 10605 10160 None 8922 Dorr2009 Flavophospholipol: Effect on multi-drug resistant <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar typhimurium in swine United States of America Experimental 10428 10428 Flavophospholipol use Flavophospholipol (Flavomycin; Huvepharma Inc, Peachtree City, Georgia) at 4.85 g per tonne added to feed for 15 - 17 weeks. For Salmonella Typhirium strain DT 104. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.13 0.02 0.62 < 0.05 None
10606 10606 10160 None 8922 Dorr2009 Flavophospholipol: Effect on multi-drug resistant <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar typhimurium in swine United States of America Experimental 10429 10429 Flavophospholipol use Flavophospholipol (Flavomycin; Huvepharma Inc, Peachtree City, Georgia) at 4.85 g per tonne added to feed for 15 - 17 weeks. For Salmonella Typhirium strain DT 193. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.27 0.07 0.97 < 0.05 None
10607 10607 10166 None 8988 10.4315/0362-028x-63.6.709 Ebner2000 Effects of antibiotic regimens on the fecal shedding patterns of pigs infected with Salmonella typhimurium United States of America Experimental 10489 10489 Carbadox and oxytetracycline use Carbadox (Mecadox; Pfizer) at 50 g/ton of feed until pigs reached 35 kg, followed by oxytetracycline at 100g/ton of feed Carbadox and oxytetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 88.60 None 79.30 None 100 100 None None None None None
10608 10608 10166 None 8988 10.4315/0362-028x-63.6.709 Ebner2000 Effects of antibiotic regimens on the fecal shedding patterns of pigs infected with Salmonella typhimurium United States of America Experimental 10490 10490 Ceftiofur sodium and oxytetracycline use Intramuscular injection of ceftiofur sodium (Naxcel; Pharmacia& Upjohn, Kalamazoo, Mich.) for 3 days followed by the inclu-sion of oxytetracycline (Terramycin; Pfizer, Groton, Conn.) at 100g/ton of feed Ceftiofur sodium and oxytetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 60.00 None 79.30 None 100 100 None None None None None
10609 10609 10166 None 8988 10.4315/0362-028x-63.6.709 Ebner2000 Effects of antibiotic regimens on the fecal shedding patterns of pigs infected with Salmonella typhimurium United States of America Experimental 10488 10488 Apramycin and oxytetracycline use Apramycin (Apralan; Elanco, Indianapolis, Ind.)at 150 g/ton of feed for 14 days followed by oxytetracycline at 100 g/ton of feed Apramycin and oxytetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 64.30 None 79.30 None 100 100 None None None None None
10610 10610 10169 None 9004 10.4315/0362-028x-64.12.2067 Edrington2001 Evaluation of subtherapeutic use of the antibiotics apramycin and carbadox on the prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella infection in swine United States of America Experimental 10493 10493 Apramycin use Apramycin in drinking water and creep feed for 21 days Apramycin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Salmonella spp. False None False 7 None 0 None None None None None 89 223 None None None None None
10611 10611 10169 None 9004 10.4315/0362-028x-64.12.2067 Edrington2001 Evaluation of subtherapeutic use of the antibiotics apramycin and carbadox on the prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella infection in swine United States of America Experimental 10493 10493 Apramycin use Apramycin in drinking water and creep feed for 21 days Apramycin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 10 None None None None None 89 223 None None None None None
10612 10612 10169 None 9004 10.4315/0362-028x-64.12.2067 Edrington2001 Evaluation of subtherapeutic use of the antibiotics apramycin and carbadox on the prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella infection in swine United States of America Experimental 10493 10493 Apramycin use Apramycin in drinking water and creep feed for 21 days Apramycin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
10613 10613 10169 None 9004 10.4315/0362-028x-64.12.2067 Edrington2001 Evaluation of subtherapeutic use of the antibiotics apramycin and carbadox on the prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella infection in swine United States of America Experimental 10493 10493 Apramycin use Apramycin in drinking water and creep feed for 21 days Apramycin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 63 None 172 None None None None None 89 223 None None None None None
10614 10614 10169 None 9004 10.4315/0362-028x-64.12.2067 Edrington2001 Evaluation of subtherapeutic use of the antibiotics apramycin and carbadox on the prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella infection in swine United States of America Experimental 10493 10493 Apramycin use Apramycin in drinking water and creep feed for 21 days Apramycin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
10615 10615 10174 None 9082 10.1089/mdr.2007.746 Emborg2007 Tetracycline consumption and occurrence of tetracycline resistance in Salmonella Typhimurium phage types from Danish pigs Denmark Observational 10496 10496 Tetracycline use Mean percentage of kilograms of pigs at the farm-owner level treated with tetracycline at any given time 1 year prior to sampling [(ADD kg/kg pigs)*100] Tetracycline use Less tetracycline use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.21 1.08 1.35 0.007 None
10618 10618 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10516 10516 Production type Conventional vs antimicrobial-free farms. Isolates taken on-farm. Antimicrobial-free farm Conventional farm Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 243 33 67 1 None None None None 282 85 None None None None None
10619 10619 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10516 10516 Production type Conventional vs antimicrobial-free farms. Isolates taken on-farm. Antimicrobial-free farm Conventional farm Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 80 33 63 1 None None None None 282 85 None None None None None
10620 10620 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10516 10516 Production type Conventional vs antimicrobial-free farms. Isolates taken on-farm. Antimicrobial-free farm Conventional farm Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella spp. False None False 80 33 52 1 None None None None 282 85 None None None None None
10621 10621 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10516 10516 Production type Conventional vs antimicrobial-free farms. Isolates taken on-farm. Antimicrobial-free farm Conventional farm Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 30 33 20 1 None None None None 282 85 None None None None None
10622 10622 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10516 10516 Production type Conventional vs antimicrobial-free farms. Isolates taken on-farm. Antimicrobial-free farm Conventional farm Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False 30 33 20 1 None None None None 282 85 None None None None None
10623 10623 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10516 10516 Production type Conventional vs antimicrobial-free farms. Isolates taken on-farm. Antimicrobial-free farm Conventional farm Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 33 2 1 None None None None 282 85 None None None None None
10624 10624 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10516 10516 Production type Conventional vs antimicrobial-free farms. Isolates taken on-farm. Antimicrobial-free farm Conventional farm Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 33 2 1 None None None None 282 85 None None None None None
10625 10625 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10516 10516 Production type Conventional vs antimicrobial-free farms. Isolates taken on-farm. Antimicrobial-free farm Conventional farm Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False 2 33 18 1 None None None None 282 85 None None None None None
10626 10626 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10542 10542 Penicillin use Any penicillin use within the 6 months prior to collection Penicillin use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 13 7 78 103 None None None None 34 356 None None None None None
10627 10627 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10542 10542 Penicillin use Any penicillin use within the 6 months prior to collection Penicillin use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides dihydrostreptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 20 7 157 103 None None None None 34 356 None None None None None
10629 10629 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10542 10542 Penicillin use Any penicillin use within the 6 months prior to collection Penicillin use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 25 7 218 103 None None None None 34 356 None None None None None
10630 10630 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10542 10542 Penicillin use Any penicillin use within the 6 months prior to collection Penicillin use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False 5 7 51 103 None None None None 34 356 None None None None None
10631 10631 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10542 10542 Penicillin use Any penicillin use within the 6 months prior to collection Penicillin use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 13 7 77 103 None None None None 34 356 None None None None None
10632 10632 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10539 10539 Methoprim-sulfonamide use Any methoprim-sulfonamide use within the 6 months prior to collection Methoprim-sulfonamide use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 9 8 78 103 None None None None 33 356 None None None None None
10633 10633 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10539 10539 Methoprim-sulfonamide use Any methoprim-sulfonamide use within the 6 months prior to collection Methoprim-sulfonamide use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides dihydrostreptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 14 8 157 103 None None None None 33 356 None None None None None
10634 10634 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10540 10540 Methoprim-sulfondamide use Any methoprim-sulfonamide use within the 6 months prior to collection Methoprim-sulfonamide use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 23 8 218 103 None None None None 33 356 None None None None None
10636 10636 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10539 10539 Methoprim-sulfonamide use Any methoprim-sulfonamide use within the 6 months prior to collection Methoprim-sulfonamide use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False 7 8 51 103 None None None None 33 356 None None None None None
10637 10637 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10539 10539 Methoprim-sulfonamide use Any methoprim-sulfonamide use within the 6 months prior to collection Methoprim-sulfonamide use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 16 8 77 103 None None None None 33 356 None None None None None
10638 10638 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10541 10541 Penicillin and streptomycin use Any penicillin and streptomycin use within the 6 months prior to collection Penicillin and streptomycin use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 11 3 78 103 None None None None 22 356 None None None None None
10640 10640 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10541 10541 Penicillin and streptomycin use Any penicillin and streptomycin use within the 6 months prior to collection Penicillin and streptomycin use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides dihydrostreptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 17 3 157 103 None None None None 22 356 None None None None None
10641 10641 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10541 10541 Penicillin and streptomycin use Any penicillin and streptomycin use within the 6 months prior to collection Penicillin and streptomycin use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 17 3 218 103 None None None None 22 356 None None None None None
10642 10642 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10541 10541 Penicillin and streptomycin use Any penicillin and streptomycin use within the 6 months prior to collection Penicillin and streptomycin use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False 7 3 51 103 None None None None 22 356 None None None None None
10643 10643 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10541 10541 Penicillin and streptomycin use Any penicillin and streptomycin use within the 6 months prior to collection Penicillin and streptomycin use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 5 3 77 103 None None None None 22 356 None None None None None
10644 10644 10127 None 14111 10.1089/fpd.2008.0152 Vieira2009 Association between tetracycline consumption and tetracycline resistance in Escherichia coli from healthy Danish slaughter pigs. Denmark Observational 10364 10364 Herd size Moderate vs largest herd size. Moderate = 201 - 1000 slaughter pigs in the herd in a year. Largest = > 3000 slaughter pigs in the herd in a year. Moderate herd size Not moderate herd size Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.41 0.78 2.55 0.25 None
10645 10645 10127 None 14111 10.1089/fpd.2008.0152 Vieira2009 Association between tetracycline consumption and tetracycline resistance in Escherichia coli from healthy Danish slaughter pigs. Denmark Observational 10361 10361 Herd size Large vs largest herd size. Large = 1001 - 3000 slaughter pigs in the herd in a year. Largest = > 3000 slaughter pigs in the herd in a year. Large herd size Largest herd size Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.07 0.71 1.60 0.73 None
10647 10647 10127 None 14111 10.1089/fpd.2008.0152 Vieira2009 Association between tetracycline consumption and tetracycline resistance in Escherichia coli from healthy Danish slaughter pigs. Denmark Observational 10367 10367 Interval Time span, in days, between last prescription and sampling date Higher interval rate Interval rate Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.01 None
10649 10649 10127 None 14111 10.1089/fpd.2008.0152 Vieira2009 Association between tetracycline consumption and tetracycline resistance in Escherichia coli from healthy Danish slaughter pigs. Denmark Observational 10370 10370 Treatment incidence rate Number of ADD/100 slaughter pig-days at risk Higher treatment incidence rate Treatment incidence rate Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.31 1.03 1.67 0.03 None
10650 10650 10127 None 14111 10.1089/fpd.2008.0152 Vieira2009 Association between tetracycline consumption and tetracycline resistance in Escherichia coli from healthy Danish slaughter pigs. Denmark Observational 10366 10366 Herd size Small vs largest herd size. Small = 1 - 200 slaughter pigs in the herd in a year. Largest = > 3000. Moderate herd size Not moderate herd size Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.54 1.50 8.31 <0.01 None
10651 10651 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10459 10459 In-feed antimicrobial use Tetracyclines added to creep, weanling pig, or grower-finisher rations In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.50 None 0.80 None None None None None None None None
10652 10652 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10458 10458 In-feed antimicrobial use Antimicrobials, other than tetracyclines, added to post-weaning rations In-feed antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.60 None 0.80 None None None None None None None None
10653 10653 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10381 10381 Chlortetracycline + Prebiotic + Probiotic use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 73.00 None 60.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10655 10655 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10381 10381 Chlortetracycline + Prebiotic + Probiotic use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 33.00 None 17.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10656 10656 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10381 10381 Chlortetracycline + Prebiotic + Probiotic use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 60.00 None 50.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10657 10657 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10381 10381 Chlortetracycline + Prebiotic + Probiotic use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 7.00 None 3.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10658 10658 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10381 10381 Chlortetracycline + Prebiotic + Probiotic use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 7.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10659 10659 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10381 10381 Chlortetracycline + Prebiotic + Probiotic use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 7.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10660 10660 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10381 10381 Chlortetracycline + Prebiotic + Probiotic use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 57.00 None 57.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10661 10661 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10382 10382 Chlortetracycline + Probiotic Use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 17.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10662 10662 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10382 10382 Chlortetracycline + Probiotic Use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 57.00 None 60.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10663 10663 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10382 10382 Chlortetracycline + Probiotic Use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 33.00 None 17.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10664 10664 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10382 10382 Chlortetracycline + Probiotic Use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 63.00 None 50.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10665 10665 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10382 10382 Chlortetracycline + Probiotic Use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.00 None 3.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10666 10666 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10382 10382 Chlortetracycline + Probiotic Use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.00 None 7.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10667 10667 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10382 10382 Chlortetracycline + Probiotic Use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.00 None 7.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10668 10668 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10382 10382 Chlortetracycline + Probiotic Use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 43.00 None 57.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10669 10669 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10383 10383 Chlortetracycline use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 17.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10670 10670 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10383 10383 Chlortetracycline use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 57.00 None 60.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10671 10671 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10383 10383 Chlortetracycline use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 43.00 None 17.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10672 10672 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10383 10383 Chlortetracycline use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 63.00 None 50.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10673 10673 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10383 10383 Chlortetracycline use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.00 None 3.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10674 10674 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10383 10383 Chlortetracycline use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.00 None 7.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10675 10675 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10383 10383 Chlortetracycline use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.00 None 7.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10676 10676 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10383 10383 Chlortetracycline use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 63.00 None 57.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10677 10677 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10384 10384 Prebiotic + Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
40206 40206 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11324 11324 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
10678 10678 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10384 10384 Prebiotic + Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 73.00 None 60.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10679 10679 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10384 10384 Prebiotic + Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 37.00 None 17.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10680 10680 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10384 10384 Prebiotic + Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 63.00 None 50.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10681 10681 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10384 10384 Prebiotic + Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 7.00 None 3.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10682 10682 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10384 10384 Prebiotic + Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 7.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10683 10683 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10384 10384 Prebiotic + Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.00 None 7.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10684 10684 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10384 10384 Prebiotic + Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 63.00 None 57.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10685 10685 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10385 10385 Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10686 10686 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10385 10385 Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 60.00 None 60.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10687 10687 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10385 10385 Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 23.00 None 17.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10688 10688 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10385 10385 Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 43.00 None 50.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10689 10689 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10385 10385 Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 3.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10690 10690 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10385 10385 Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.00 None 7.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10691 10691 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10385 10385 Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.00 None 7.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10692 10692 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10385 10385 Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 83.00 None 57.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10693 10693 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10381 10381 Chlortetracycline + Prebiotic + Probiotic use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 60.00 None 50.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10694 10694 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10381 10381 Chlortetracycline + Prebiotic + Probiotic use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 7.00 None 7.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10695 10695 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10381 10381 Chlortetracycline + Prebiotic + Probiotic use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 97.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10696 10696 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10381 10381 Chlortetracycline + Prebiotic + Probiotic use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 17.00 None 23.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10697 10697 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10382 10382 Chlortetracycline + Probiotic Use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 60.00 None 50.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10698 10698 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10382 10382 Chlortetracycline + Probiotic Use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 7.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10699 10699 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10382 10382 Chlortetracycline + Probiotic Use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 97.00 None 97.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10700 10700 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10382 10382 Chlortetracycline + Probiotic Use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline + direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline and direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 17.00 None 23.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10701 10701 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10383 10383 Chlortetracycline use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 63.00 None 50.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10702 10702 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10383 10383 Chlortetracycline use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 13.00 None 7.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10703 10703 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10383 10383 Chlortetracycline use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 97.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10704 10704 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10383 10383 Chlortetracycline use 400 mg/kg chlortetracycline use for 42 days, chlortetracycline removed at days 14 & 28, and resumed days 15 & 29, respectively Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 20.00 None 23.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10705 10705 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10384 10384 Prebiotic + Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 63.00 None 50.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10706 10706 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10384 10384 Prebiotic + Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 13.00 None 7.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10707 10707 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10384 10384 Prebiotic + Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 97.00 None 97.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10708 10708 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10384 10384 Prebiotic + Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Poultry Star) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 20.00 None 23.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10709 10709 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10385 10385 Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 47.00 None 50.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10710 10710 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10385 10385 Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 7.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10711 10711 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10385 10385 Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 93.00 None 97.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10712 10712 10133 None 14374 10.1093/jas/sky370 Williams2018 Effects of chlortetracycline alone or in combination with direct fed microbials on nursery pig growth performance and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 10385 10385 Probiotic use Direct fed microbial (0.05% Bioplus 2B) use for 42 days Direct fed microbial use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 13.00 None 23.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
10713 10713 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10454 10454 Individual antimicrobial-specific treatments specific to class of pig Individual antimicrobial-specific treatments specific to grower-finishers Antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 30.80 None 19.10 None None None None None None None None
10714 10714 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10454 10454 Individual antimicrobial-specific treatments specific to class of pig Individual antimicrobial-specific treatments specific to grower-finishers Antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 20.20 None 21.40 None None None None None None None None
10715 10715 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10454 10454 Individual antimicrobial-specific treatments specific to class of pig Individual antimicrobial-specific treatments specific to grower-finishers Antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 46.00 None 34.00 None None None None None None None None
10716 10716 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10454 10454 Individual antimicrobial-specific treatments specific to class of pig Individual antimicrobial-specific treatments specific to grower-finishers Antimicrobial use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 77.60 None 78.00 None None None None None None None None
10717 10717 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10012 10012 Market type Independent poultry shops vs supermarkets. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Supermarkets = chain stores offering avariety of food and household items. Independent Supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 7.10 None 0.00 None 28 11 None None None None None
10718 10718 10004 None 10250 10.2527/jas.2007-0091 Jacob2008 Effects of feeding wet corn distillers grains with solubles with or without monensin and tylosin on the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of fecal foodborne pathogenic and commensal bacteria in feedlot cattle United States of America Experimental 10004 10004 Antimicrobial Use Monensin was administered in feed at a rate of 300mg/animal/day and tylosin fed at a rate of 90mg/animal/day as Tylan premix. Monensin No antibiotics Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus coli False None False None None None None 66.70 None 36.80 None 100 100 None None None None None
10719 10719 10004 None 10250 10.2527/jas.2007-0091 Jacob2008 Effects of feeding wet corn distillers grains with solubles with or without monensin and tylosin on the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of fecal foodborne pathogenic and commensal bacteria in feedlot cattle United States of America Experimental 10005 10005 Antimicrobial Use Monensin was administered in feed at a rate of 300mg/animal/day and tylosin fed at a rate of 90mg/animal/day as Tylan premix. Monensin & Tylosin No antibiotics Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 75.00 None 36.80 None 100 100 None None None None None
10720 10720 10004 None 10250 10.2527/jas.2007-0091 Jacob2008 Effects of feeding wet corn distillers grains with solubles with or without monensin and tylosin on the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of fecal foodborne pathogenic and commensal bacteria in feedlot cattle United States of America Experimental 10004 10004 Antimicrobial Use Monensin was administered in feed at a rate of 300mg/animal/day and tylosin fed at a rate of 90mg/animal/day as Tylan premix. Monensin No antibiotics Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 66.70 None 36.80 None 100 100 None None None None None
10721 10721 10004 None 10250 10.2527/jas.2007-0091 Jacob2008 Effects of feeding wet corn distillers grains with solubles with or without monensin and tylosin on the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of fecal foodborne pathogenic and commensal bacteria in feedlot cattle United States of America Experimental 10004 10004 Antimicrobial Use Monensin was administered in feed at a rate of 300mg/animal/day and tylosin fed at a rate of 90mg/animal/day as Tylan premix. Monensin No antibiotics Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 66.70 None 36.80 None 100 100 None None None None None
10722 10722 10004 None 10250 10.2527/jas.2007-0091 Jacob2008 Effects of feeding wet corn distillers grains with solubles with or without monensin and tylosin on the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of fecal foodborne pathogenic and commensal bacteria in feedlot cattle United States of America Experimental 10006 10006 Antimicrobial Use Monensin was administered in feed at a rate of 300mg/animal/day and tylosin fed at a rate of 90mg/animal/day as Tylan premix. Monensin&Tylosin No antibiotics Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 75.00 None 36.80 None 100 100 None None None None None
10723 10723 10005 None 10251 10.1089/fpd.2009.0401 Jacob2010 Effects of feeding elevated concentrations of copper and zinc on the antimicrobial susceptibilities of fecal bacteria in feedlot cattle United States of America Experimental 10009 10009 Antimicrobial Use The four treatments of the study were combintions of 1X NRC recommended copper (10mg/kg diet) and 1X zinc (30 mg/kg diet) and 10X these doses. Elevated Cu and Zn in feed No elevated Cu and Zn in feed Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Antidotes copper sulfate None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 12 None None None None None 60 60 None None None None None
10724 10724 10022 None 10657 10.1089/fpd.2007.0010 Khaitsa2007 Occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella species in raw and ready to eat Turkey meat products from retail outlets in the midwestern United States United States of America Unclear 10063 10063 Raw vs Ready to Eat None Raw Ready to Eat Turkey Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 14 7 None None None None None
10725 10725 10076 None 12128 10.1017/s0950268815002423 Noyes2016 Modelling considerations in the analysis of associations between antimicrobial use and resistance in beef feedlot cattle United States of America Observational 10213 10213 Antimicrobial use Recent parenteral quinolone exposure (<6 days prior to sample collection) Exposed Unexposed Cattle Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia None False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.16 0.02 None None None
10727 10727 10020 None 10653 10.1128/aem.02584-05 Khachatryan2006 Use of a nonmedicated dietary supplement correlates with increased prevalence of streptomycin-sulfa-tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli on a dairy farm United States of America Experimental 10061 10061 dietary supplement without oxytetracycline dietary supplement was prepared by mixing 8.3 kg of dry skim milk, 156 g of vitamin D premix, and 241 g of vitamin A-30 premix dietary supplement without oxytetracycline no supplement Cattle Other None None Farm Farm None None None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None 9 9 None None None None None
10728 10728 10020 None 10653 10.1128/aem.02584-05 Khachatryan2006 Use of a nonmedicated dietary supplement correlates with increased prevalence of streptomycin-sulfa-tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli on a dairy farm United States of America Experimental 10060 10060 dietary supplement with oxytetracycline dietary supplement was prepared by mixing 8.3 kg of dry skim milk, 156 g of vitamin D premix, 241 g of vitamin A-30 premix and 412 g of Pennox-50 (oxytetracycline hydrochloride, equivalent to 110 g/kg; Pennfield Animal Health, Omaha, NE) dietary supplement with oxytetracycline (Pennox-50) no supplement Cattle Other None None None None None None None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None 9 9 None None None None None
10729 10729 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10090 10090 administered CCFA administered CCFA as a single-dose regimen (6.6 mg/kg, SC, on day 0) Antimicrobial use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm None Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 240 723 None None None None None
10730 10730 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10090 10090 administered CCFA administered CCFA as a single-dose regimen (6.6 mg/kg, SC, on day 0) Antimicrobial use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm None Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 240 723 None None None None None
10731 10731 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10090 10090 administered CCFA administered CCFA as a single-dose regimen (6.6 mg/kg, SC, on day 0) Antimicrobial use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm None Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 240 723 None None None None None
10732 10732 10159 None 8877 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.11.032 Dolejska2011 IncN plasmids carrying blaCTX-M-1 in Escherichia coli isolates on a dairy farm Czechia Observational 10426 10426 Production Type Conventional antibiotic use vs. organic low antibiotic usage Conventional Organic Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False 119 None 1 None None None None None 309 154 None None None None None
10733 10733 10025 None 10748 10.3382/ps/pex275 Kim2018 Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10067 10067 Organic farming Organic and conventional chicken carcass samples were collected from local retail markets Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus Combination False None False 6 46 17 35 None None None None 52 52 None None None None None
10735 10735 10054 None 11596 10.3168/jds.2016-11891 Maynou2017 Feeding of waste milk to Holstein calves affects antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli and Pasteurella multocida isolated from fecal and nasal swabs Spain Observational 10145 10145 Calf management Calves fed waste milk Vs. Milk replacer Calves fed waste milk Calves fed milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.70 0.10 5.90 0.702 None
10736 10736 10054 None 11596 10.3168/jds.2016-11891 Maynou2017 Feeding of waste milk to Holstein calves affects antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli and Pasteurella multocida isolated from fecal and nasal swabs Spain Observational 10145 10145 Calf management Calves fed waste milk Vs. Milk replacer Calves fed waste milk Calves fed milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.50 0.40 31.40 0.266 None
10737 10737 10054 None 11596 10.3168/jds.2016-11891 Maynou2017 Feeding of waste milk to Holstein calves affects antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli and Pasteurella multocida isolated from fecal and nasal swabs Spain Observational 10145 10145 Calf management Calves fed waste milk Vs. Milk replacer Calves fed waste milk Calves fed milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Polymyxins colistin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.70 0.30 2.00 0.544 None
10738 10738 10054 None 11596 10.3168/jds.2016-11891 Maynou2017 Feeding of waste milk to Holstein calves affects antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli and Pasteurella multocida isolated from fecal and nasal swabs Spain Observational 10145 10145 Calf management Calves fed waste milk Vs. Milk replacer Calves fed waste milk Calves fed milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines doxycycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.00 0.50 2.00 0.984 None
10739 10739 10054 None 11596 10.3168/jds.2016-11891 Maynou2017 Feeding of waste milk to Holstein calves affects antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli and Pasteurella multocida isolated from fecal and nasal swabs Spain Observational 10145 10145 Calf management Calves fed waste milk Vs. Milk replacer Calves fed waste milk Calves fed milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 6.10 1.80 20.80 0.004 None
10740 10740 10054 None 11596 10.3168/jds.2016-11891 Maynou2017 Feeding of waste milk to Holstein calves affects antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli and Pasteurella multocida isolated from fecal and nasal swabs Spain Observational 10145 10145 Calf management Calves fed waste milk Vs. Milk replacer Calves fed waste milk Calves fed milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.90 0.20 3.80 0.877 None
10741 10741 10054 None 11596 10.3168/jds.2016-11891 Maynou2017 Feeding of waste milk to Holstein calves affects antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli and Pasteurella multocida isolated from fecal and nasal swabs Spain Observational 10145 10145 Calf management Calves fed waste milk Vs. Milk replacer Calves fed waste milk Calves fed milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Amphenicols florfenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 6.60 1.50 29.80 0.014 None
10742 10742 10054 None 11596 10.3168/jds.2016-11891 Maynou2017 Feeding of waste milk to Holstein calves affects antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli and Pasteurella multocida isolated from fecal and nasal swabs Spain Observational 10145 10145 Calf management Calves fed waste milk Vs. Milk replacer Calves fed waste milk Calves fed milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.10 1.30 13.20 0.019 None
10743 10743 10055 None 11597 10.3168/jds.2017-13040 Maynou2017a Effects of feeding pasteurized waste milk to dairy calves on phenotypes and genotypes of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli isolates before and after weaning United States of America Experimental 10147 10147 Calf management Calves fed pasteurized waste milk Vs. milk replacer Pasteurized waste milk Milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Escherichia coli False None False 45 0 30 0 None None None None 45 30 None None None None None
10744 10744 10055 None 11597 10.3168/jds.2017-13040 Maynou2017a Effects of feeding pasteurized waste milk to dairy calves on phenotypes and genotypes of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli isolates before and after weaning United States of America Experimental 10147 10147 Calf management Calves fed pasteurized waste milk Vs. milk replacer Pasteurized waste milk Milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins benzylpenicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 45 0 30 0 None None None None 45 30 None None None None None
10745 10745 10055 None 11597 10.3168/jds.2017-13040 Maynou2017a Effects of feeding pasteurized waste milk to dairy calves on phenotypes and genotypes of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli isolates before and after weaning United States of America Experimental 10147 10147 Calf management Calves fed pasteurized waste milk Vs. milk replacer Pasteurized waste milk Milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Lincosamides pirlimycin None Escherichia coli False None False 44 1 30 0 None None None None 45 30 None None None None None
10746 10746 10055 None 11597 10.3168/jds.2017-13040 Maynou2017a Effects of feeding pasteurized waste milk to dairy calves on phenotypes and genotypes of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli isolates before and after weaning United States of America Experimental 10147 10147 Calf management Calves fed pasteurized waste milk Vs. milk replacer Pasteurized waste milk Milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 55.90 None 12.20 None 45 30 None None None None None
10747 10747 10055 None 11597 10.3168/jds.2017-13040 Maynou2017a Effects of feeding pasteurized waste milk to dairy calves on phenotypes and genotypes of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli isolates before and after weaning United States of America Experimental 10147 10147 Calf management Calves fed pasteurized waste milk Vs. milk replacer Pasteurized waste milk Milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 40.00 None 0.00 None 45 30 None None None None None
10748 10748 10055 None 11597 10.3168/jds.2017-13040 Maynou2017a Effects of feeding pasteurized waste milk to dairy calves on phenotypes and genotypes of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli isolates before and after weaning United States of America Experimental 10147 10147 Calf management Calves fed pasteurized waste milk Vs. milk replacer Pasteurized waste milk Milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols florfenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 35.60 None 23.30 None 45 30 None None None None None
10749 10749 10055 None 11597 10.3168/jds.2017-13040 Maynou2017a Effects of feeding pasteurized waste milk to dairy calves on phenotypes and genotypes of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli isolates before and after weaning United States of America Experimental 10147 10147 Calf management Calves fed pasteurized waste milk Vs. milk replacer Pasteurized waste milk Milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 89.40 None 83.80 None 45 30 None None None None None
10750 10750 10055 None 11597 10.3168/jds.2017-13040 Maynou2017a Effects of feeding pasteurized waste milk to dairy calves on phenotypes and genotypes of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli isolates before and after weaning United States of America Experimental 10147 10147 Calf management Calves fed pasteurized waste milk Vs. milk replacer Pasteurized waste milk Milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 57.90 None 53.40 None 45 30 None None None None None
10751 10751 10055 None 11597 10.3168/jds.2017-13040 Maynou2017a Effects of feeding pasteurized waste milk to dairy calves on phenotypes and genotypes of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli isolates before and after weaning United States of America Experimental 10147 10147 Calf management Calves fed pasteurized waste milk Vs. milk replacer Pasteurized waste milk Milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 19.90 None 16.40 None 45 30 None None None None None
10752 10752 10059 None 11654 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.10.006 Medhanie2016 On-farm starling populations and other environmental and management factors associated with the presence of cefotaxime and ciprofloxacin resistant E. coli among dairy cattle in Ohio United States of America Observational 10155 10155 Season Summer Vs. Fall Fall sampling (September-November) Summer sampling (June-August) Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.07 2.01 8.21 <0.001 None
10754 10754 10059 None 11654 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.10.006 Medhanie2016 On-farm starling populations and other environmental and management factors associated with the presence of cefotaxime and ciprofloxacin resistant E. coli among dairy cattle in Ohio United States of America Observational 10155 10155 Season Summer Vs. Fall Fall sampling (September-November) Summer sampling (June-August) Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.71 1.71 8.02 0.001 None
10755 10755 10059 None 11654 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.10.006 Medhanie2016 On-farm starling populations and other environmental and management factors associated with the presence of cefotaxime and ciprofloxacin resistant E. coli among dairy cattle in Ohio United States of America Observational 10154 10154 Farm environment Presence or Absence of starlings Presence of starlings Absence of starlings Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.58 0.28 1.20 0.139 None
10756 10756 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 15.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10757 10757 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 85.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10758 10758 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 15.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10759 10759 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 25.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10760 10760 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 25.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10761 10761 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10762 10762 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10763 10763 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10764 10764 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10765 10765 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 20.00 None 10.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10766 10766 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10767 10767 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 80.00 None 60.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10768 10768 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10769 10769 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10770 10770 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 85.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10771 10771 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10772 10772 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10773 10773 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10774 10774 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10775 10775 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10776 10776 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10777 10777 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10778 10778 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.00 None 10.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10779 10779 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10780 10780 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 70.00 None 60.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10781 10781 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10782 10782 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10783 10783 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 90.00 None 85.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10784 10784 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10785 10785 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10786 10786 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10787 10787 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10788 10788 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10789 10789 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10790 10790 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10791 10791 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 10.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10792 10792 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10793 10793 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 80.00 None 60.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10794 10794 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10795 10795 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10796 10796 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 85.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10797 10797 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10798 10798 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10799 10799 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10800 10800 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 15.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10801 10801 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10802 10802 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10803 10803 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10804 10804 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 15.00 None 10.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10805 10805 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10806 10806 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 85.00 None 60.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10807 10807 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10502 10502 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10808 10808 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10809 10809 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 85.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10810 10810 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10811 10811 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10812 10812 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10813 10813 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10814 10814 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10815 10815 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10816 10816 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10817 10817 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.00 None 10.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10818 10818 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10819 10819 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 75.00 None 60.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10820 10820 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10821 10821 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 15.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10822 10822 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 95.00 None 85.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10823 10823 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 15.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10824 10824 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 15.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10825 10825 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 15.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10826 10826 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10827 10827 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10828 10828 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10829 10829 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10830 10830 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.00 None 10.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10831 10831 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10832 10832 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 70.00 None 60.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10833 10833 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10834 10834 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10835 10835 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 85.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10836 10836 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10837 10837 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10838 10838 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10839 10839 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10840 10840 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10841 10841 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10842 10842 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10843 10843 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 10.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10844 10844 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10845 10845 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 75.00 None 60.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10846 10846 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10847 10847 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10848 10848 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 5.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10849 10849 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials daptomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 10.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10850 10850 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 30.00 None 15.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10851 10851 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10852 10852 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10853 10853 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Lincosamides lincomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 70.00 None 95.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10854 10854 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials linezolid None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10855 10855 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10856 10856 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins combinations of penicillins None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10857 10857 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 20.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10858 10858 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 5.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10859 10859 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 90.00 None 60.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10860 10860 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tigecycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10861 10861 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 30.00 None 15.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10862 10862 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10499 10499 Copper use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu) in feed Copper use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10863 10863 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10864 10864 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10865 10865 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials daptomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 15.00 None 10.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10866 10866 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 15.00 None 15.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10867 10867 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10868 10868 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 10.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10869 10869 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Lincosamides lincomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 85.00 None 95.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10870 10870 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials linezolid None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10871 10871 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10872 10872 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10505 10505 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed. Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins combinations of penicillins None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10873 10873 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 10.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10874 10874 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 10.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10875 10875 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 65.00 None 60.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10876 10876 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tigecycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10877 10877 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 10.00 None 15.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10878 10878 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10504 10504 Zinc use Added zinc oxide (ZnO; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn) in feed Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10879 10879 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10880 10880 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 10.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10881 10881 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials daptomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 10.00 None 10.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10882 10882 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 25.00 None 15.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10883 10883 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10884 10884 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 10.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10885 10885 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Lincosamides lincomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 60.00 None 95.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10886 10886 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials linezolid None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10887 10887 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10888 10888 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins combinations of penicillins None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10889 10889 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 35.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10890 10890 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 5.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10891 10891 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 80.00 None 60.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10892 10892 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tigecycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10893 10893 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 30.00 None 15.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10894 10894 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10498 10498 Copper and Zinc use Added copper sulfate (CuSO4) and zinc oxide (ZnO): (0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn) to feed Copper and Zinc use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10895 10895 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10896 10896 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10897 10897 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials daptomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 5.00 None 10.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10898 10898 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 5.00 None 15.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10899 10899 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10900 10900 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10901 10901 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Lincosamides lincomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 90.00 None 95.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10902 10902 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials linezolid None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10903 10903 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10904 10904 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins combinations of penicillins None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10905 10905 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 10.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10906 10906 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10907 10907 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 70.00 None 60.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10908 10908 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tigecycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10909 10909 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 5.00 None 15.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10910 10910 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10501 10501 RAC use Added Ractopamine hydrochloride ( RAC HCl4; 0 vs. 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10911 10911 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10912 10912 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 5.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10913 10913 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials daptomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 10.00 None 10.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10914 10914 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 30.00 None 15.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10915 10915 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10916 10916 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 10.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10917 10917 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Lincosamides lincomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 80.00 None 95.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10918 10918 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials linezolid None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10919 10919 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10920 10920 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins combinations of penicillins None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10921 10921 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 25.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10922 10922 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 15.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10923 10923 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 65.00 None 60.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10924 10924 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tigecycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10925 10925 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 30.00 None 15.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10926 10926 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10497 10497 Copper and RAC use Added Copper sulfate and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10927 10927 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10928 10928 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10929 10929 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials daptomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 15.00 None 10.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10930 10930 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 20.00 None 15.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10931 10931 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10932 10932 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10933 10933 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Lincosamides lincomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 90.00 None 95.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10934 10934 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials linezolid None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10935 10935 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10936 10936 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins combinations of penicillins None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10937 10937 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 25.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10938 10938 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10939 10939 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 85.00 None 60.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10940 10940 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tigecycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10941 10941 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 20.00 None 15.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10942 10942 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10503 10503 Zinc and RAC use Added Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10943 10943 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10944 10944 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10945 10945 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials daptomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 5.00 None 10.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10946 10946 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 5.00 None 15.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10947 10947 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10948 10948 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10949 10949 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Lincosamides lincomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 70.00 None 95.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10950 10950 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials linezolid None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10951 10951 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10952 10952 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins combinations of penicillins None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10953 10953 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 40.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10954 10954 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 5.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10955 10955 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 80.00 None 60.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10956 10956 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tigecycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10957 10957 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 5.00 None 15.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10958 10958 10179 None 9211 10.2527/jas.2016-0340 Feldpausch2016 Effects of dietary copper, zinc, and ractopamine hydrochloride on finishing pig growth performance, carcass characteristics, and antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria United States of America Experimental 10500 10500 Copper, Zinc and RAC use Added Copper sulfate, Zinc oxide and ractopamine hydrochloride (CUSO4, ZnO, RAC; 0 vs. 125 mg/kg Cu + 150 mg/kg Zn + 10 mg/kg RAC during only the final 28 d) to feed Copper, Zinc and RAC use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
10959 10959 10190 None 9370 10.1089/mdr.2006.12.210 Funk2006 The effect of subtherapeutic chlortetracycline on antimicrobial resistance in the fecal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10511 10511 Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use Treatment group received 50 g of chlortetracycline per ton (U.S.) of feed for the entire finisher period(~10 weeks of age until ~24 weeks of age). Control group did not. Other AMU administered to both groups (see text). Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 14 None 1 None None None None None 14 1 None None None None None
10960 10960 10022 None 10657 10.1089/fpd.2007.0010 Khaitsa2007 Occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella species in raw and ready to eat Turkey meat products from retail outlets in the midwestern United States United States of America Unclear 10063 10063 Raw vs Ready to Eat None Raw Ready to Eat Turkey Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 2.00 None 0.00 None 14 7 None None None None None
10961 10961 10022 None 10657 10.1089/fpd.2007.0010 Khaitsa2007 Occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella species in raw and ready to eat Turkey meat products from retail outlets in the midwestern United States United States of America Unclear 10063 10063 Raw vs Ready to Eat None Raw Ready to Eat Turkey Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 3.00 None 5.00 None 14 7 None None None None None
10962 10962 10022 None 10657 10.1089/fpd.2007.0010 Khaitsa2007 Occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella species in raw and ready to eat Turkey meat products from retail outlets in the midwestern United States United States of America Unclear 10063 10063 Raw vs Ready to Eat None Raw Ready to Eat Turkey Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 1.00 None 0.00 None 14 7 None None None None None
10963 10963 10022 None 10657 10.1089/fpd.2007.0010 Khaitsa2007 Occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella species in raw and ready to eat Turkey meat products from retail outlets in the midwestern United States United States of America Unclear 10063 10063 Raw vs Ready to Eat None Raw Ready to Eat Turkey Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella None False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 14 7 None None None None None
10964 10964 10022 None 10657 10.1089/fpd.2007.0010 Khaitsa2007 Occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella species in raw and ready to eat Turkey meat products from retail outlets in the midwestern United States United States of America Unclear 10063 10063 Raw vs Ready to Eat None Raw Ready to Eat Turkey Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 5.00 None 3.00 None 14 7 None None None None None
10965 10965 10022 None 10657 10.1089/fpd.2007.0010 Khaitsa2007 Occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella species in raw and ready to eat Turkey meat products from retail outlets in the midwestern United States United States of America Unclear 10063 10063 Raw vs Ready to Eat None Raw Ready to Eat Turkey Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 14 7 None None None None None
10966 10966 10022 None 10657 10.1089/fpd.2007.0010 Khaitsa2007 Occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella species in raw and ready to eat Turkey meat products from retail outlets in the midwestern United States United States of America Unclear 10063 10063 Raw vs Ready to Eat None Raw Ready to Eat Turkey Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 14 7 None None None None None
10967 10967 10022 None 10657 10.1089/fpd.2007.0010 Khaitsa2007 Occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella species in raw and ready to eat Turkey meat products from retail outlets in the midwestern United States United States of America Unclear 10063 10063 Raw vs Ready to Eat None Raw Ready to Eat Turkey Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 1.00 None 1.00 None 14 7 None None None None None
10968 10968 10022 None 10657 10.1089/fpd.2007.0010 Khaitsa2007 Occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella species in raw and ready to eat Turkey meat products from retail outlets in the midwestern United States United States of America Unclear 10063 10063 Raw vs Ready to Eat None Raw Ready to Eat Turkey Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 14 7 None None None None None
10969 10969 10022 None 10657 10.1089/fpd.2007.0010 Khaitsa2007 Occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella species in raw and ready to eat Turkey meat products from retail outlets in the midwestern United States United States of America Unclear 10063 10063 Raw vs Ready to Eat None Raw Ready to Eat Turkey Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Salmonella spp. False None False 4 None 5 None None None None None 14 7 None None None None None
10970 10970 10022 None 10657 10.1089/fpd.2007.0010 Khaitsa2007 Occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella species in raw and ready to eat Turkey meat products from retail outlets in the midwestern United States United States of America Unclear 10063 10063 Raw vs Ready to Eat None Raw Ready to Eat Turkey Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 11.00 None 5.00 None 14 7 None None None None None
10971 10971 10022 None 10657 10.1089/fpd.2007.0010 Khaitsa2007 Occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella species in raw and ready to eat Turkey meat products from retail outlets in the midwestern United States United States of America Unclear 10063 10063 Raw vs Ready to Eat None Raw Ready to Eat Turkey Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 1.00 None 0.00 None 14 7 None None None None None
10972 10972 10032 None 11076 Lee1993 Detection of tetracycline resistance determinants in pig isolates from three herds with different histories of antimicrobial agent exposure United States of America Observational 10078 10078 Antimicrobial Use The AB(antibiotic exposure) herd routinely received chlortetracycline in its feed, the NAB (non- antibiotic exposed) herd had not been exposed to antimicrobial agents in 146 months AB herd NAB herd Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Unclear None See gene column tet(A) None None False None False None None None None 0.00 None 4.00 None 35 24 None None None None None
10973 10973 10032 None 11076 Lee1993 Detection of tetracycline resistance determinants in pig isolates from three herds with different histories of antimicrobial agent exposure United States of America Observational 10079 10079 Antimicrobial Use The TH herd received therapeutic levels of antibiotics, the NAB (non- antibiotic exposed) herd had not been exposed to antimicrobial agents in 146 months TH herd NAB herd Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Unclear None See gene column tet(A) None None False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 19 24 None None None None None
10974 10974 10032 None 11076 Lee1993 Detection of tetracycline resistance determinants in pig isolates from three herds with different histories of antimicrobial agent exposure United States of America Observational 10078 10078 Antimicrobial Use The AB(antibiotic exposure) herd routinely received chlortetracycline in its feed, the NAB (non- antibiotic exposed) herd had not been exposed to antimicrobial agents in 146 months AB herd NAB herd Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Unclear None See gene column tet(B) None None False None False None None None None 51.00 None 17.00 None 35 24 None None None None None
10975 10975 10032 None 11076 Lee1993 Detection of tetracycline resistance determinants in pig isolates from three herds with different histories of antimicrobial agent exposure United States of America Observational 10079 10079 Antimicrobial Use The TH herd received therapeutic levels of antibiotics, the NAB (non- antibiotic exposed) herd had not been exposed to antimicrobial agents in 146 months TH herd NAB herd Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Unclear None See gene column tet(B) None None False None False None None None None 26.00 None 17.00 None 19 24 None None None None None
10976 10976 10032 None 11076 Lee1993 Detection of tetracycline resistance determinants in pig isolates from three herds with different histories of antimicrobial agent exposure United States of America Observational 10076 10076 Antimicrobial Use None AB herd NAB herd Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Unclear None See gene column tet(C) None None False None False None None None None 6.00 None 29.00 None 35 24 None None None None None
10977 10977 10032 None 11076 Lee1993 Detection of tetracycline resistance determinants in pig isolates from three herds with different histories of antimicrobial agent exposure United States of America Observational 10077 10077 Antimicrobial Use None TH herd NAB herd Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Unclear None See gene column tet(C) None None False None False None None None None 0.00 None 29.00 None 19 24 None None None None None
10978 10978 10032 None 11076 Lee1993 Detection of tetracycline resistance determinants in pig isolates from three herds with different histories of antimicrobial agent exposure United States of America Observational 10076 10076 Antimicrobial Use None AB herd NAB herd Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Unclear None See gene column tet(D) None None False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 35 24 None None None None None
10979 10979 10032 None 11076 Lee1993 Detection of tetracycline resistance determinants in pig isolates from three herds with different histories of antimicrobial agent exposure United States of America Observational 10077 10077 Antimicrobial Use None TH herd NAB herd Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Unclear None See gene column tet(D) None None False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 19 24 None None None None None
10980 10980 10036 None 11115 10.4315/0362-028x-67.7.1433 LeJeune2004 Microbiological quality of ground beef from conventionally-reared cattle and raised without antibiotics label claims United States of America Experimental 10081 10081 Production Type None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None False None False None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
10981 10981 10061 None 11769 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.01.020 Miranda2009 Influence of farming methods on microbiological contamination and prevalence of resistance to antimicrobial drugs in isolates from beef Spain Observational 10159 10159 Production System None Conventional Organic Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 64.30 None 43.10 None 87 93 None None None None None
10982 10982 10061 None 11769 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.01.020 Miranda2009 Influence of farming methods on microbiological contamination and prevalence of resistance to antimicrobial drugs in isolates from beef Spain Observational 10159 10159 Production System None Conventional Organic Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 6.80 None 10.70 None 87 93 None None None None None
10983 10983 10061 None 11769 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.01.020 Miranda2009 Influence of farming methods on microbiological contamination and prevalence of resistance to antimicrobial drugs in isolates from beef Spain Observational 10159 10159 Production System None Conventional Organic Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Tetracyclines doxycycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 72.40 None 57.90 None 87 93 None None None None None
10984 10984 10061 None 11769 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.01.020 Miranda2009 Influence of farming methods on microbiological contamination and prevalence of resistance to antimicrobial drugs in isolates from beef Spain Observational 10159 10159 Production System None Conventional Organic Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 11.50 None 2.20 None 87 93 None None None None None
10985 10985 10061 None 11769 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.01.020 Miranda2009 Influence of farming methods on microbiological contamination and prevalence of resistance to antimicrobial drugs in isolates from beef Spain Observational 10159 10159 Production System None Conventional Organic Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 71.30 None 53.70 None 87 93 None None None None None
10988 10988 10190 None 9370 10.1089/mdr.2006.12.210 Funk2006 The effect of subtherapeutic chlortetracycline on antimicrobial resistance in the fecal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10511 10511 Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use Treatment group received 50 g of chlortetracycline per ton (U.S.) of feed for the entire finisher period(~10 weeks of age until ~24 weeks of age). Control group did not. Other AMU administered to both groups (see text). Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 14 None 1 None None None None None 14 1 None None None None None
10989 10989 10190 None 9370 10.1089/mdr.2006.12.210 Funk2006 The effect of subtherapeutic chlortetracycline on antimicrobial resistance in the fecal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10511 10511 Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use Treatment group received 50 g of chlortetracycline per ton (U.S.) of feed for the entire finisher period(~10 weeks of age until ~24 weeks of age). Control group did not. Other AMU administered to both groups (see text). Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 14 1 None None None None None
10990 10990 10190 None 9370 10.1089/mdr.2006.12.210 Funk2006 The effect of subtherapeutic chlortetracycline on antimicrobial resistance in the fecal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10511 10511 Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use Treatment group received 50 g of chlortetracycline per ton (U.S.) of feed for the entire finisher period(~10 weeks of age until ~24 weeks of age). Control group did not. Other AMU administered to both groups (see text). Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False 4 None 1 None None None None None 14 1 None None None None None
10991 10991 10190 None 9370 10.1089/mdr.2006.12.210 Funk2006 The effect of subtherapeutic chlortetracycline on antimicrobial resistance in the fecal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10511 10511 Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use Treatment group received 50 g of chlortetracycline per ton (U.S.) of feed for the entire finisher period(~10 weeks of age until ~24 weeks of age). Control group did not. Other AMU administered to both groups (see text). Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 14 1 None None None None None
10992 10992 10190 None 9370 10.1089/mdr.2006.12.210 Funk2006 The effect of subtherapeutic chlortetracycline on antimicrobial resistance in the fecal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10511 10511 Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use Treatment group received 50 g of chlortetracycline per ton (U.S.) of feed for the entire finisher period(~10 weeks of age until ~24 weeks of age). Control group did not. Other AMU administered to both groups (see text). Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 14 1 None None None None None
10993 10993 10190 None 9370 10.1089/mdr.2006.12.210 Funk2006 The effect of subtherapeutic chlortetracycline on antimicrobial resistance in the fecal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10511 10511 Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use Treatment group received 50 g of chlortetracycline per ton (U.S.) of feed for the entire finisher period(~10 weeks of age until ~24 weeks of age). Control group did not. Other AMU administered to both groups (see text). Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 14 1 None None None None None
10994 10994 10190 None 9370 10.1089/mdr.2006.12.210 Funk2006 The effect of subtherapeutic chlortetracycline on antimicrobial resistance in the fecal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10511 10511 Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use Treatment group received 50 g of chlortetracycline per ton (U.S.) of feed for the entire finisher period(~10 weeks of age until ~24 weeks of age). Control group did not. Other AMU administered to both groups (see text). Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False 14 None 1 None None None None None 14 1 None None None None None
10995 10995 10014 None 10526 10.1128/jcm.00169-08 Kaneene2008 Changes in tetracycline susceptibility of enteric bacteria following switching to nonmedicated milk replacer for dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10040 10040 Antimicrobial Use Milk replacer fed contained oxytetracycline and neomycin: fecal matter results Feeding of medicated milk replacer was discontinued Calves were continuously fed medicated milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 90.70 9.30 97.80 2.20 578 834 None None None None None
10996 10996 10014 None 10526 10.1128/jcm.00169-08 Kaneene2008 Changes in tetracycline susceptibility of enteric bacteria following switching to nonmedicated milk replacer for dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10040 10040 Antimicrobial Use Milk replacer fed contained oxytetracycline and neomycin: fecal matter results Feeding of medicated milk replacer was discontinued Calves were continuously fed medicated milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 54.60 45.40 100.00 0.00 11 114 None None None None None
10997 10997 10014 None 10526 10.1128/jcm.00169-08 Kaneene2008 Changes in tetracycline susceptibility of enteric bacteria following switching to nonmedicated milk replacer for dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10040 10040 Antimicrobial Use Milk replacer fed contained oxytetracycline and neomycin: fecal matter results Feeding of medicated milk replacer was discontinued Calves were continuously fed medicated milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 92.30 7.70 91.70 8.30 13 12 None None None None None
10998 10998 10014 None 10526 10.1128/jcm.00169-08 Kaneene2008 Changes in tetracycline susceptibility of enteric bacteria following switching to nonmedicated milk replacer for dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10039 10039 Antimicrobial Use Milk replacer fed contained oxytetracycline and neomycin: Calf pen environmental swab results Feeding of medicated milk replacer was discontinued Calves were continuously fed medicated milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 75.80 24.20 76.70 23.30 33 30 None None None None None
10999 10999 10014 None 10526 10.1128/jcm.00169-08 Kaneene2008 Changes in tetracycline susceptibility of enteric bacteria following switching to nonmedicated milk replacer for dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10038 10038 Antimicrobial Use Milk replacer fed contained oxytetracycline and neomycin: Calf pen environmental swab results Feeding of medicated milk replacer was discontinued Calves were continuously fed medicated milk replacer Cattle None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 100.00 66.70 33.30 4 6 None None None None None
11000 11000 10014 None 10526 10.1128/jcm.00169-08 Kaneene2008 Changes in tetracycline susceptibility of enteric bacteria following switching to nonmedicated milk replacer for dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10039 10039 Antimicrobial Use Milk replacer fed contained oxytetracycline and neomycin: Calf pen environmental swab results Feeding of medicated milk replacer was discontinued Calves were continuously fed medicated milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None None None 0.00 100.00 0 1 None None None None None
11001 11001 10014 None 10526 10.1128/jcm.00169-08 Kaneene2008 Changes in tetracycline susceptibility of enteric bacteria following switching to nonmedicated milk replacer for dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10042 10042 Antimicrobial Use Milk replacer fed contained oxytetracycline and neomycin: Maternity pen environmental swab results Feeding of medicated milk replacer was discontinued Calves were continuously fed medicated milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 15.60 84.40 34.20 65.80 32 41 None None None None None
11002 11002 10014 None 10526 10.1128/jcm.00169-08 Kaneene2008 Changes in tetracycline susceptibility of enteric bacteria following switching to nonmedicated milk replacer for dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10042 10042 Antimicrobial Use Milk replacer fed contained oxytetracycline and neomycin: Maternity pen environmental swab results Feeding of medicated milk replacer was discontinued Calves were continuously fed medicated milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 100.00 20.00 80.00 2 5 None None None None None
11003 11003 10014 None 10526 10.1128/jcm.00169-08 Kaneene2008 Changes in tetracycline susceptibility of enteric bacteria following switching to nonmedicated milk replacer for dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10041 10041 Antimicrobial Use Milk replacer fed contained oxytetracycline and neomycin: Maternity pen environmental swab results Feeding of medicated milk replacer was discontinued Calves were continuously fed medicated milk replacer Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 33.30 66.70 50.00 50.00 3 2 None None None None None
11004 11004 10050 None 11567 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.212 Mathew2005 Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring United States of America Experimental 10139 10139 Oxytetracycline use Sows received oxytetracycline at 100g/ton prior to farrowing. Sample taken from nursing piglets on day 21. (S0 vs SW) Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 61.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11005 11005 10050 None 11567 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.212 Mathew2005 Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring United States of America Experimental 10125 10125 Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use Apramycin in feed (150g/ton) from day 28 to 42 of age, then oxytetracycline (50 g/ton) until market weight. Samples from nursery/weaner pigs on day 81. Sows received no antimicrobials prior to farrowing for both groups. (S0-P0 vs S0-PW) Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 96.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11010 11010 10077 None 12132 10.1080/00480169.2008.36801 Nulsen2008 Antibiotic resistance among indicator bacteria isolated from healthy pigs in New Zealand New Zealand Experimental 10216 10216 Production type Antimicrobial resistance (%) of Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp isolated from the faeces of pigs, grown on three conventional farms (A, B, C) and one organic farm (D) in New Zealand. S1 data compared. Conventional farm Organic farm Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.00 None 0.00 None 121 32 None None None None None
11011 11011 10077 None 12132 10.1080/00480169.2008.36801 Nulsen2008 Antibiotic resistance among indicator bacteria isolated from healthy pigs in New Zealand New Zealand Experimental 10215 10215 Production Type None None None None Not Specified None None None None None None None None None None None False None False None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
11012 11012 10082 None 12441 10.7717/peerj.6546 Pereira2019 Association between herd management practices and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella spp. from cull dairy cattle in Central California United States of America Experimental 10224 10224 Antimicrobial use None Treated with ampicillin Not treated with ampicillin Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.00 0.50 18.00 0.18 None
11013 11013 10082 None 12441 10.7717/peerj.6546 Pereira2019 Association between herd management practices and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella spp. from cull dairy cattle in Central California United States of America Experimental 10223 10223 Anitmicrobial use None Treated with Ampicillin Not treated with ampicillin Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 7.30 1.10 45.90 0.01 None
11014 11014 10082 None 12441 10.7717/peerj.6546 Pereira2019 Association between herd management practices and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella spp. from cull dairy cattle in Central California United States of America Experimental 10224 10224 Antimicrobial use None Treated with ampicillin Not treated with ampicillin Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.40 0.70 7.50 0.11 None
11015 11015 10082 None 12441 10.7717/peerj.6546 Pereira2019 Association between herd management practices and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella spp. from cull dairy cattle in Central California United States of America Experimental 10225 10225 Antimicrobial Use None Treated with ceftiofur Not treated with ceftiofur Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.00 0.60 6.30 0.22 None
11016 11016 10082 None 12441 10.7717/peerj.6546 Pereira2019 Association between herd management practices and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella spp. from cull dairy cattle in Central California United States of America Experimental 10225 10225 Antimicrobial Use None Treated with ceftiofur Not treated with ceftiofur Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.00 1.05 3.80 0.03 None
11017 11017 10082 None 12441 10.7717/peerj.6546 Pereira2019 Association between herd management practices and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella spp. from cull dairy cattle in Central California United States of America Experimental 10225 10225 Antimicrobial Use None Treated with ceftiofur Not treated with ceftiofur Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.00 0.30 3.00 0.99 None
11018 11018 10082 None 12441 10.7717/peerj.6546 Pereira2019 Association between herd management practices and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella spp. from cull dairy cattle in Central California United States of America Experimental 10227 10227 Cull reason None Low milk Not low milk Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.10 0.40 2.80 0.78 None
11019 11019 10082 None 12441 10.7717/peerj.6546 Pereira2019 Association between herd management practices and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella spp. from cull dairy cattle in Central California United States of America Experimental 10227 10227 Cull reason None Low milk Not low milk Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.10 0.03 0.60 0.004 None
11020 11020 10082 None 12441 10.7717/peerj.6546 Pereira2019 Association between herd management practices and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella spp. from cull dairy cattle in Central California United States of America Experimental 10227 10227 Cull reason None Low milk Not low milk Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.40 0.20 0.60 >0.0001 None
11021 11021 10082 None 12441 10.7717/peerj.6546 Pereira2019 Association between herd management practices and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella spp. from cull dairy cattle in Central California United States of America Experimental 10227 10227 Cull reason None Low milk Not low milk Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.60 0.70 3.40 0.2 None
11022 11022 10082 None 12441 10.7717/peerj.6546 Pereira2019 Association between herd management practices and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella spp. from cull dairy cattle in Central California United States of America Experimental 10229 10229 Cull reason None Poor reproductive outcomes No poor reproductive outcomes Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.60 0.20 1.60 0.31 None
11023 11023 10082 None 12441 10.7717/peerj.6546 Pereira2019 Association between herd management practices and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella spp. from cull dairy cattle in Central California United States of America Experimental 10229 10229 Cull reason None Poor reproductive outcomes No poor reproductive outcomes Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.50 0.99 2.50 0.052 None
11024 11024 10082 None 12441 10.7717/peerj.6546 Pereira2019 Association between herd management practices and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella spp. from cull dairy cattle in Central California United States of America Experimental 10229 10229 Cull reason None Poor reproductive outcomes No poor reproductive outcomes Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.59 0.30 1.30 0.17 None
11025 11025 10082 None 12441 10.7717/peerj.6546 Pereira2019 Association between herd management practices and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella spp. from cull dairy cattle in Central California United States of America Experimental 10226 10226 Cull reason None Lameness No lameness Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 14.90 4.00 54.80 >0.0001 None
11026 11026 10082 None 12441 10.7717/peerj.6546 Pereira2019 Association between herd management practices and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella spp. from cull dairy cattle in Central California United States of America Experimental 10226 10226 Cull reason None Lameness No lameness Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.40 1.30 4.40 0.002 None
11027 11027 10082 None 12441 10.7717/peerj.6546 Pereira2019 Association between herd management practices and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella spp. from cull dairy cattle in Central California United States of America Experimental 10226 10226 Cull reason None Lameness No lameness Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.10 1.40 6.80 0.002 None
11028 11028 10082 None 12441 10.7717/peerj.6546 Pereira2019 Association between herd management practices and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella spp. from cull dairy cattle in Central California United States of America Experimental 10228 10228 Cull reason None Mastitis No mastitis Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.20 0.30 4.90 0.76 None
11029 11029 10082 None 12441 10.7717/peerj.6546 Pereira2019 Association between herd management practices and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella spp. from cull dairy cattle in Central California United States of America Experimental 10228 10228 Cull reason None Mastitis No mastitis Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.10 0.70 13.80 0.11 None
11030 11030 10082 None 12441 10.7717/peerj.6546 Pereira2019 Association between herd management practices and antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella spp. from cull dairy cattle in Central California United States of America Experimental 10228 10228 Cull reason None Mastitis No mastitis Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.90 0.96 3.70 0.057 None
11031 11031 10088 None 12507 10.2460/ajvr.69.8.988 Platt2008 Antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria recovered from feedlot cattle administered chlortetracycline in feed United States of America Experimental 10244 10244 Chlortetracycline Use Steers administered chlortetracycline (22 mg/kg) in feed in 3 separate 5-day periods (1 day of no AMU between each period). Factor =avg of all sampling timepoints (days -7, 0, 2, 6, 8, 12, 14, 19, 22, 26, 33). Both groups had other AMU in feed. Chlortetracycline Use No Chlortetracycline Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 68.80 None 42.30 None 213 184 None None None None None
11032 11032 10088 None 12507 10.2460/ajvr.69.8.988 Platt2008 Antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria recovered from feedlot cattle administered chlortetracycline in feed United States of America Experimental 10244 10244 Chlortetracycline Use Steers administered chlortetracycline (22 mg/kg) in feed in 3 separate 5-day periods (1 day of no AMU between each period). Factor =avg of all sampling timepoints (days -7, 0, 2, 6, 8, 12, 14, 19, 22, 26, 33). Both groups had other AMU in feed. Chlortetracycline Use No Chlortetracycline Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.90 None 8.60 None 213 184 None None None None None
11033 11033 10088 None 12507 10.2460/ajvr.69.8.988 Platt2008 Antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria recovered from feedlot cattle administered chlortetracycline in feed United States of America Experimental 10244 10244 Chlortetracycline Use Steers administered chlortetracycline (22 mg/kg) in feed in 3 separate 5-day periods (1 day of no AMU between each period). Factor =avg of all sampling timepoints (days -7, 0, 2, 6, 8, 12, 14, 19, 22, 26, 33). Both groups had other AMU in feed. Chlortetracycline Use No Chlortetracycline Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 53.30 None 12.30 None 179 187 None None None None None
11034 11034 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10251 10251 Production Type Frequency of farms with at least one resistant Salmonella isolate to individual antimicrobial agents was reported Conventional Organic Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False 21 None 9 None None None None None 69 26 None None None None None
11035 11035 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10251 10251 Production Type Frequency of farms with at least one resistant Salmonella isolate to individual antimicrobial agents was reported Conventional Organic Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 22 None 8 None None None None None 69 26 None None None None None
11036 11036 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10251 10251 Production Type Frequency of farms with at least one resistant Salmonella isolate to individual antimicrobial agents was reported Conventional Organic Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. False None False 10 None 3 None None None None None 69 26 None None None None None
11037 11037 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10251 10251 Production Type Frequency of farms with at least one resistant Salmonella isolate to individual antimicrobial agents was reported Conventional Organic Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 69 26 None None None None None
11038 11038 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10251 10251 Production Type Frequency of farms with at least one resistant Salmonella isolate to individual antimicrobial agents was reported Conventional Organic Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella spp. False None False 26 None 8 None None None None None 69 26 None None None None None
11039 11039 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10251 10251 Production Type Frequency of farms with at least one resistant Salmonella isolate to individual antimicrobial agents was reported Conventional Organic Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False 14 None 3 None None None None None 69 26 None None None None None
11040 11040 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10251 10251 Production Type Frequency of farms with at least one resistant Salmonella isolate to individual antimicrobial agents was reported Conventional Organic Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 69 26 None None None None None
11041 11041 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10251 10251 Production Type Frequency of farms with at least one resistant Salmonella isolate to individual antimicrobial agents was reported Conventional Organic Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False 7 None 1 None None None None None 69 26 None None None None None
11042 11042 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10251 10251 Production Type Frequency of farms with at least one resistant Salmonella isolate to individual antimicrobial agents was reported Conventional Organic Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 15 None 4 None None None None None 69 26 None None None None None
11043 11043 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10251 10251 Production Type Frequency of farms with at least one resistant Salmonella isolate to individual antimicrobial agents was reported Conventional Organic Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 69 26 None None None None None
11044 11044 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10251 10251 Production Type Frequency of farms with at least one resistant Salmonella isolate to individual antimicrobial agents was reported Conventional Organic Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 21 None 2 None None None None None 69 26 None None None None None
11045 11045 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10251 10251 Production Type Frequency of farms with at least one resistant Salmonella isolate to individual antimicrobial agents was reported Conventional Organic Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella spp. False None False 20 None 4 None None None None None 69 26 None None None None None
11046 11046 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10251 10251 Production Type Frequency of farms with at least one resistant Salmonella isolate to individual antimicrobial agents was reported Conventional Organic Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella spp. False None False 20 None 4 None None None None None 69 26 None None None None None
11047 11047 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10251 10251 Production Type Frequency of farms with at least one resistant Salmonella isolate to individual antimicrobial agents was reported Conventional Organic Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella spp. False None False 20 None 4 None None None None None 69 26 None None None None None
11048 11048 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10251 10251 Production Type Frequency of farms with at least one resistant Salmonella isolate to individual antimicrobial agents was reported Conventional Organic Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 28 None 8 None None None None None 69 26 None None None None None
11049 11049 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10251 10251 Production Type Frequency of farms with at least one resistant Salmonella isolate to individual antimicrobial agents was reported Conventional Organic Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 69 26 None None None None None
11050 11050 10140 None 8423 10.1089/fpd.2006.0074 Cho2007 Antimicrobial susceptibility of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from organic dairy farms, conventional dairy farms, and county fairs in Minnesota United States of America Observational 10394 10394 Prduction Type Organic Vs. Conventional Conventional Organic Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 2 27 0 23 None None None None 29 23 None None None None None
11051 11051 10140 None 8423 10.1089/fpd.2006.0074 Cho2007 Antimicrobial susceptibility of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from organic dairy farms, conventional dairy farms, and county fairs in Minnesota United States of America Observational 10394 10394 Prduction Type Organic Vs. Conventional Conventional Organic Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 3 26 0 23 None None None None 29 23 None None None None None
11052 11052 10140 None 8423 10.1089/fpd.2006.0074 Cho2007 Antimicrobial susceptibility of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from organic dairy farms, conventional dairy farms, and county fairs in Minnesota United States of America Observational 10394 10394 Prduction Type Organic Vs. Conventional Conventional Organic Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 3 26 0 23 None None None None 29 23 None None None None None
11053 11053 10140 None 8423 10.1089/fpd.2006.0074 Cho2007 Antimicrobial susceptibility of shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolated from organic dairy farms, conventional dairy farms, and county fairs in Minnesota United States of America Observational 10394 10394 Prduction Type Organic Vs. Conventional Conventional Organic Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 72.40 None 39.10 None 29 23 None None None None None
11054 11054 10200 None 9668 10.1016/s1090-0233(02)00244-7 Gunn2003 Comparison of antibiotic resistance for Escherichia coli populations isolated from groups of diarrhoeic and control valves United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10538 10538 Farm health status Farms with reported outbreak of enteritis vs. no reported outbreak Diarrhoeic non-Diarrhoeic Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 53 None 28 None None None None None 56 40 None None None None None
11055 11055 10200 None 9668 10.1016/s1090-0233(02)00244-7 Gunn2003 Comparison of antibiotic resistance for Escherichia coli populations isolated from groups of diarrhoeic and control valves United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10538 10538 Farm health status Farms with reported outbreak of enteritis vs. no reported outbreak Diarrhoeic non-Diarrhoeic Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 1 None None None None None 55 42 None None None None None
11056 11056 10200 None 9668 10.1016/s1090-0233(02)00244-7 Gunn2003 Comparison of antibiotic resistance for Escherichia coli populations isolated from groups of diarrhoeic and control valves United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10538 10538 Farm health status Farms with reported outbreak of enteritis vs. no reported outbreak Diarrhoeic non-Diarrhoeic Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 0 None None None None None 56 42 None None None None None
11057 11057 10128 None 14118 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-299 Vikram2018 Similar levels of antimicrobial resistance in u.S. food service ground beef products with and without a Raised without Antibiotics claim United States of America Observational 10373 10373 Production type None Conventional Raised without antibiotics Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 52.40 None 35.20 None 191 179 None None None None None
11058 11058 10128 None 14118 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-299 Vikram2018 Similar levels of antimicrobial resistance in u.S. food service ground beef products with and without a Raised without Antibiotics claim United States of America Observational 10373 10373 Production type None Conventional Raised without antibiotics Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 1.60 None 0.00 None 191 179 None None None None None
11059 11059 10128 None 14118 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-299 Vikram2018 Similar levels of antimicrobial resistance in u.S. food service ground beef products with and without a Raised without Antibiotics claim United States of America Observational 10373 10373 Production type None Conventional Raised without antibiotics Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 191 179 None None None None None
11060 11060 10128 None 14118 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-299 Vikram2018 Similar levels of antimicrobial resistance in u.S. food service ground beef products with and without a Raised without Antibiotics claim United States of America Observational 10373 10373 Production type None Conventional Raised without antibiotics Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 94.80 None 91.10 None 191 179 None None None None None
11061 11061 10128 None 14118 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-299 Vikram2018 Similar levels of antimicrobial resistance in u.S. food service ground beef products with and without a Raised without Antibiotics claim United States of America Observational 10373 10373 Production type None Conventional Raised without antibiotics Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail None Retail Meat Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 27.80 None 23.50 None 191 179 None None None None None
11063 11063 10128 None 14118 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-299 Vikram2018 Similar levels of antimicrobial resistance in u.S. food service ground beef products with and without a Raised without Antibiotics claim United States of America Observational 10373 10373 Production type None Conventional Raised without antibiotics Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur, combinations None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.10 None 0.60 None 191 179 None None None None None
11064 11064 10128 None 14118 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-299 Vikram2018 Similar levels of antimicrobial resistance in u.S. food service ground beef products with and without a Raised without Antibiotics claim United States of America Observational 10373 10373 Production type None Conventional Raised without antibiotics Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur, combinations None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 1.10 None 0.00 None 191 179 None None None None None
11066 11066 10117 None 13477 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.009 Snow2012 Risk factors associated with extended spectrum beta-lactamase Escherichia coli (CTX-M) on dairy farms in North West England and North Wales United States of America Observational 10334 10334 Antimicrobial use 3rd or 4th generation cephalosporin used in last 12 months use no use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Farm Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.93 1.08 14.29 0.037 None
11067 11067 10117 None 13477 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.009 Snow2012 Risk factors associated with extended spectrum beta-lactamase Escherichia coli (CTX-M) on dairy farms in North West England and North Wales United States of America Observational 10333 10333 Antimicrobial use 1st or 2nd generation cephalosporins used on farm in last 12 months use no use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 18 22 8 16 None None None None None None None None None None None
11068 11068 10117 None 13477 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.009 Snow2012 Risk factors associated with extended spectrum beta-lactamase Escherichia coli (CTX-M) on dairy farms in North West England and North Wales United States of America Observational 10335 10335 Antimicrobial use amoxicillin/clavulanate used on farm in last 12 months use no use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 6 10 21 28 None None None None None None None None None None None
11069 11069 10117 None 13477 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.009 Snow2012 Risk factors associated with extended spectrum beta-lactamase Escherichia coli (CTX-M) on dairy farms in North West England and North Wales United States of America Observational 10332 10332 Antimicorbial use Any cephalosporins used on farm in last 12 months use no use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 21 27 5 11 None None None None None None None None None None None
11088 11088 10050 None 11567 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.212 Mathew2005 Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring United States of America Experimental 10126 10126 Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use Apramycin in feed (150g/ton) from day 28 to 42 of age, then oxytetracycline (50 g/ton) until market weight. Samples from nursery/weaner pigs on day 81. Sows received oxytetracycline at 100g/ton prior to farrowing for both groups. (SW-P0 vs SW-PW) Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11089 11089 10050 None 11567 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.212 Mathew2005 Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring United States of America Experimental 10128 10128 Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use Apramycin in feed (150g/ton) on from day 28 to 42 of age, then oxytetracycline (50 g/ton) until market weight. Samples from grow-finish pigs on day 135. Sows received oxytetracycline at 100g/ton prior to farrowing for both groups. (SW-P0 vs SW-PW) Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 81.80 None 100 100 None None None None None
11090 11090 10050 None 11567 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.212 Mathew2005 Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring United States of America Experimental 10127 10127 Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use Apramycin in feed (150g/ton) on from day 28 to 42 of age, then oxytetracycline (50 g/ton) until market weight. Samples from grow-finish pigs on day 135. Sows received no antimicrobials prior to farrowing for both groups. (S0-P0 vs S0-PW) Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 95.60 None 100 100 None None None None None
11092 11092 10050 None 11567 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.212 Mathew2005 Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring United States of America Experimental 10132 10132 Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use Sows received oxytetracycline at 100g/ton prior to farrowing. Apramycin use in feed (150g/ton) of resulting pigs from day 28 to 42 of age, then oxytetracycline (50 g/ton) until market weight. Sample from nursery/weaner pigs on day 81. (S0-P0 vs SW-PW) Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 96.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11094 11094 10050 None 11567 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.212 Mathew2005 Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring United States of America Experimental 10131 10131 Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use Sows received oxytetracycline at 100g/ton prior to farrowing. Apramycin use in feed (150g/ton) of resulting pigs from day 28 to 42 of age, then oxytetracycline (50 g/ton) until market weight. Sample from grow-finish pigs on day 135. (S0-P0 vs SW-PW) Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 95.60 None 100 100 None None None None None
11095 11095 10207 None 9878 10.2460/ajvr.70.3.389 Heider2009 Identification of Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica organisms with reduced susceptibility to ceftriaxone from fecal samples of cows in dairy herds United States of America Observational 10572 10572 Ceftiofur use Ceftiofur used as an injectible antimicrobial on the farm within the previous 12 months Injectable ceftiofur use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.19 0.84 1.67 0.32 None
11097 11097 10050 None 11567 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.212 Mathew2005 Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring United States of America Experimental 10134 10134 Oxytetracycline use Sows received oxytetracycline at 100g/ton prior to farrowing. Apramycin use in feed (150g/ton) of all pigs from day 28 to 42 of age, then oxytetracycline (50 g/ton) until market weight. Sample from nursery/weaner pigs on day 81. (S0-PW vs SW-PW) Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11098 11098 10050 None 11567 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.212 Mathew2005 Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring United States of America Experimental 10133 10133 Oxytetracycline use Sows received oxytetracycline at 100g/ton prior to farrowing. Apramycin use in feed (150g/ton) of all pigs from day 28 to 42 of age, then oxytetracycline (50 g/ton) until market weight. Sample from grow-finish pigs on day 135. (S0-PW vs SW-PW) Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11099 11099 10050 None 11567 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.212 Mathew2005 Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring United States of America Experimental 10138 10138 Oxytetracycline use Sows received oxytetracycline at 100g/ton prior to farrowing. Sample taken from nursery/weaner pigs with no antimicrobial use on day 81. (S0-P0 vs SW-P0) Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 96.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11100 11100 10050 None 11567 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.212 Mathew2005 Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring United States of America Experimental 10140 10140 Oxytetracycline use (S0-P0 vs SW-P0) Sows received oxytetracycline at 100g/ton prior to farrowing. Sample taken from grow-finish pigs with no antimicrobial use on day 135. Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 81.80 None 95.60 None 100 100 None None None None None
11101 11101 10050 None 11567 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.212 Mathew2005 Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring United States of America Experimental 10139 10139 Oxytetracycline use Sows received oxytetracycline at 100g/ton prior to farrowing. Sample taken from nursing piglets on day 21. (S0 vs SW) Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 26.50 None 12.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11102 11102 10050 None 11567 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.212 Mathew2005 Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring United States of America Experimental 10129 10129 Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use Apramycin in feed (150g/ton) on from day 28 to 42 of age, then oxytetracycline (50 g/ton) until market weight. Samples from nursery/weaner pigs on day 81. Sows received no antimicrobials prior to farrowing for both groups. (S0-P0 vs S0-PW) Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 96.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11103 11103 10050 None 11567 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.212 Mathew2005 Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring United States of America Experimental 10130 10130 Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use Apramycin in feed (150g/ton) on from day 28 to 42 of age, then oxytetracycline (50 g/ton) until market weight. Samples from nursery/weaner pigs on day 81. Sows received oxytetracycline at 100g/ton prior to farrowing for both groups. (SW-P0 vs SW-PW) Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11104 11104 10050 None 11567 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.212 Mathew2005 Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring United States of America Experimental 10128 10128 Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use Apramycin in feed (150g/ton) on from day 28 to 42 of age, then oxytetracycline (50 g/ton) until market weight. Samples from grow-finish pigs on day 135. Sows received oxytetracycline at 100g/ton prior to farrowing for both groups. (SW-P0 vs SW-PW) Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 18.90 None 0.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11105 11105 10050 None 11567 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.212 Mathew2005 Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring United States of America Experimental 10127 10127 Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use Apramycin in feed (150g/ton) on from day 28 to 42 of age, then oxytetracycline (50 g/ton) until market weight. Samples from grow-finish pigs on day 135. Sows received no antimicrobials prior to farrowing for both groups. (S0-P0 vs S0-PW) Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 41.30 None 21.70 None 100 100 None None None None None
11106 11106 10050 None 11567 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.212 Mathew2005 Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring United States of America Experimental 10138 10138 Oxytetracycline use Sows received oxytetracycline at 100g/ton prior to farrowing. Sample taken from nursery/weaner pigs with no antimicrobial use on day 81. (S0-P0 vs SW-P0) Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 18.80 None 0.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11108 11108 10050 None 11567 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.212 Mathew2005 Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring United States of America Experimental 10132 10132 Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use Sows received oxytetracycline at 100g/ton prior to farrowing. Apramycin use in feed (150g/ton) of resulting pigs from day 28 to 42 of age, then oxytetracycline (50 g/ton) until market weight. Sample from nursery/weaner pigs on day 81. (S0-P0 vs SW-PW) Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 44.70 None 0.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11109 11109 10050 None 11567 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.212 Mathew2005 Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring United States of America Experimental 10137 10137 Oxytetracycline use Sows received oxytetracycline at 100g/ton prior to farrowing. Sample taken from grow-finish pigs with no antimicrobial use on day 135. (S0-P0 vs SW-P0) Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 21.70 None 100 100 None None None None None
11110 11110 10050 None 11567 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.212 Mathew2005 Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring United States of America Experimental 10131 10131 Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use Sows received oxytetracycline at 100g/ton prior to farrowing. Apramycin use in feed (150g/ton) of resulting pigs from day 28 to 42 of age, then oxytetracycline (50 g/ton) until market weight. Sample from grow-finish pigs on day 135. (S0-P0 vs SW-PW) Apramycin + Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 18.90 None 21.70 None 100 100 None None None None None
11111 11111 10050 None 11567 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.212 Mathew2005 Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring United States of America Experimental 10136 10136 Oxytetracycline use Sows received oxytetracycline at 100g/ton prior to farrowing. Apramycin use in feed (150g/ton) of all pigs from day 28 to 42 of age, then oxytetracycline (50 g/ton) until market weight. Sample taken from nursery/weaner pigs on day 81. (S0-PW vs SW-PW) Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 44.70 None 10.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11112 11112 10050 None 11567 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.212 Mathew2005 Effects of antibiotic use in sows on resistance of E. coli and Salmonella enterica Typhimurium in their offspring United States of America Experimental 10135 10135 Oxytetracycline use Sows received oxytetracycline at 100g/ton prior to farrowing. Apramycin use in feed (150g/ton) of all pigs from day 28 to 42 of age, then oxytetracycline (50 g/ton) until market weight. Sample taken from grow-finish pigs on day 135. (S0-PW vs SW-PW) Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 18.90 None 41.30 None 100 100 None None None None None
11115 11115 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10012 10012 Market type Independent poultry shops vs supermarkets. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Supermarkets = chain stores offering avariety of food and household items. Independent Supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 10.70 None 9.10 None 28 11 None None None None None
11116 11116 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10012 10012 Market type Independent poultry shops vs supermarkets. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Supermarkets = chain stores offering avariety of food and household items. Independent Supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 14.30 None 27.30 None 28 11 None None None None None
11117 11117 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10012 10012 Market type Independent poultry shops vs supermarkets. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Supermarkets = chain stores offering avariety of food and household items. Independent Supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 28 11 None None None None None
11118 11118 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10012 10012 Market type Independent poultry shops vs supermarkets. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Supermarkets = chain stores offering avariety of food and household items. Independent Supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 3.60 None 9.10 None 28 11 None None None None None
11119 11119 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10012 10012 Market type Independent poultry shops vs supermarkets. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Supermarkets = chain stores offering avariety of food and household items. Independent Supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 64.30 None 81.80 None 28 11 None None None None None
11120 11120 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10012 10012 Market type Independent poultry shops vs supermarkets. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Supermarkets = chain stores offering avariety of food and household items. Independent Supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 9.10 None 28 11 None None None None None
11121 11121 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10012 10012 Market type Independent poultry shops vs supermarkets. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Supermarkets = chain stores offering avariety of food and household items. Independent Supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 32.10 None 36.40 None 28 11 None None None None None
11122 11122 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10012 10012 Market type Independent poultry shops vs supermarkets. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Supermarkets = chain stores offering avariety of food and household items. Independent Supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 35.70 None 18.20 None 28 11 None None None None None
11123 11123 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10012 10012 Market type Independent poultry shops vs supermarkets. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Supermarkets = chain stores offering avariety of food and household items. Independent Supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 42.90 None 81.80 None 28 11 None None None None None
11124 11124 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10013 10013 Market type Municipal market vs supermarkets. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Wet/municipal market = open food markets and butcher shops w/ fruit/veg stands. Supermarkets = chain stores offering a variety of food and household items. Municipal market Supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 9.40 None 0.00 None 64 11 None None None None None
11125 11125 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10013 10013 Market type Municipal market vs supermarkets. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Wet/municipal market = open food markets and butcher shops w/ fruit/veg stands. Supermarkets = chain stores offering a variety of food and household items. Municipal market Supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 10.90 None 9.10 None 64 11 None None None None None
11126 11126 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10013 10013 Market type Municipal market vs supermarkets. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Wet/municipal market = open food markets and butcher shops w/ fruit/veg stands. Supermarkets = chain stores offering a variety of food and household items. Municipal market Supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 20.30 None 27.30 None 64 11 None None None None None
40207 40207 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11324 11324 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
11127 11127 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10013 10013 Market type Municipal market vs supermarkets. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Wet/municipal market = open food markets and butcher shops w/ fruit/veg stands. Supermarkets = chain stores offering a variety of food and household items. Municipal market Supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 1.60 None 0.00 None 64 11 None None None None None
11128 11128 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10013 10013 Market type Municipal market vs supermarkets. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Wet/municipal market = open food markets and butcher shops w/ fruit/veg stands. Supermarkets = chain stores offering a variety of food and household items. Municipal market Supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 4.70 None 9.10 None 64 11 None None None None None
11129 11129 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10013 10013 Market type Municipal market vs supermarkets. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Wet/municipal market = open food markets and butcher shops w/ fruit/veg stands. Supermarkets = chain stores offering a variety of food and household items. Municipal market Supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 42.20 None 81.80 None 64 11 None None None None None
11130 11130 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10013 10013 Market type Municipal market vs supermarkets. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Wet/municipal market = open food markets and butcher shops w/ fruit/veg stands. Supermarkets = chain stores offering a variety of food and household items. Municipal market Supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 9.10 None 64 11 None None None None None
11131 11131 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10013 10013 Market type Municipal market vs supermarkets. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Wet/municipal market = open food markets and butcher shops w/ fruit/veg stands. Supermarkets = chain stores offering a variety of food and household items. Municipal market Supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 37.50 None 36.40 None 64 11 None None None None None
11132 11132 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10013 10013 Market type Municipal market vs supermarkets. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Wet/municipal market = open food markets and butcher shops w/ fruit/veg stands. Supermarkets = chain stores offering a variety of food and household items. Municipal market Supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 46.90 None 18.20 None 64 11 None None None None None
11133 11133 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10013 10013 Market type Municipal market vs supermarkets. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Wet/municipal market = open food markets and butcher shops w/ fruit/veg stands. Supermarkets = chain stores offering a variety of food and household items. Municipal market Supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 28.10 None 81.80 None 64 11 None None None None None
11134 11134 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10011 10011 Market storage condition Refrigerated vs ambient temperature. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Ambient temperature Refrigerated Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 9.80 None 0.00 None 82 21 None None None None None
11135 11135 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10011 10011 Market storage condition Refrigerated vs ambient temperature. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Ambient temperature Refrigerated Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 11.00 None 9.50 None 82 21 None None None None None
11136 11136 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10011 10011 Market storage condition Refrigerated vs ambient temperature. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Ambient temperature Refrigerated Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 19.50 None 19.00 None 82 21 None None None None None
11137 11137 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10011 10011 Market storage condition Refrigerated vs ambient temperature. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Ambient temperature Refrigerated Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 1.20 None 0.00 None 82 21 None None None None None
11138 11138 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10011 10011 Market storage condition Refrigerated vs ambient temperature. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Ambient temperature Refrigerated Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 2.40 None 9.50 None 82 21 None None None None None
11139 11139 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10011 10011 Market storage condition Refrigerated vs ambient temperature. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Ambient temperature Refrigerated Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 48.80 None 66.70 None 82 21 None None None None None
11140 11140 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10011 10011 Market storage condition Refrigerated vs ambient temperature. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Ambient temperature Refrigerated Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 4.80 None 82 21 None None None None None
11141 11141 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10011 10011 Market storage condition Refrigerated vs ambient temperature. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Ambient temperature Refrigerated Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 36.60 None 33.30 None 82 21 None None None None None
11142 11142 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10011 10011 Market storage condition Refrigerated vs ambient temperature. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Ambient temperature Refrigerated Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 42.70 None 33.30 None 82 21 None None None None None
11143 11143 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10011 10011 Market storage condition Refrigerated vs ambient temperature. Whole chicken carcass samples were collected. Ambient temperature Refrigerated Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 30.50 None 66.70 None 82 21 None None None None None
11145 11145 10198 None 9533 10.3168/jds.2016-11134 Gonggrijp2016 Prevalence and risk factors for extended-spectrum β-lactamase- and AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in dairy farms Netherlands None 10529 10529 Antimicrobial Use The use of third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins on farm Use of third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins on farm No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Herd Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 8.05 1.17 55.33 0.03 None
11146 11146 10198 None 9533 10.3168/jds.2016-11134 Gonggrijp2016 Prevalence and risk factors for extended-spectrum β-lactamase- and AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in dairy farms Netherlands None 10528 10528 Antimicrobial use Clinical mastitis cases treated with antimicrobials Antimicorbial use no use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Herd Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.92 1.23 12.52 0.02 None
11147 11147 10198 None 9533 10.3168/jds.2016-11134 Gonggrijp2016 Prevalence and risk factors for extended-spectrum β-lactamase- and AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in dairy farms Netherlands None 10534 10534 Presence of other animals on farm Presence of sheep on the farm Sheep on farm No sheep on farm Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False 4 12 36 44 None None None None None None None None None None None
11148 11148 10198 None 9533 10.3168/jds.2016-11134 Gonggrijp2016 Prevalence and risk factors for extended-spectrum β-lactamase- and AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in dairy farms Netherlands None 10533 10533 Presence of other animals on farm Presence of goats on farm Goats on farm No goats on farm Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False 3 10 37 46 None None None None None None None None None None None
11149 11149 10198 None 9533 10.3168/jds.2016-11134 Gonggrijp2016 Prevalence and risk factors for extended-spectrum β-lactamase- and AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in dairy farms Netherlands None 10531 10531 Floor type in freestall barn slated floor vs. solid floor slated floor solid floor Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False 32 52 4 2 None None None None None None None None None None None
11150 11150 10198 None 9533 10.3168/jds.2016-11134 Gonggrijp2016 Prevalence and risk factors for extended-spectrum β-lactamase- and AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in dairy farms Netherlands None 10537 10537 Treatments Internal teat sealants are used for dry cow therapy Yes No Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False 11 25 29 31 None None None None None None None None None None None
11151 11151 10198 None 9533 10.3168/jds.2016-11134 Gonggrijp2016 Prevalence and risk factors for extended-spectrum β-lactamase- and AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in dairy farms Netherlands None 10535 10535 Treatments Administration of minerals to dry cows Yes No Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False 35 42 5 14 None None None None None None None None None None None
11152 11152 10198 None 9533 10.3168/jds.2016-11134 Gonggrijp2016 Prevalence and risk factors for extended-spectrum β-lactamase- and AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in dairy farms Netherlands None 10536 10536 Treatments Administration of minerals to young stock Yes No Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False 32 36 8 20 None None None None None None None None None None None
11153 11153 10198 None 9533 10.3168/jds.2016-11134 Gonggrijp2016 Prevalence and risk factors for extended-spectrum β-lactamase- and AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in dairy farms Netherlands None 10532 10532 Milking Stripping before milking Yes No Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False 7 17 21 27 None None None None None None None None None None None
11154 11154 10198 None 9533 10.3168/jds.2016-11134 Gonggrijp2016 Prevalence and risk factors for extended-spectrum β-lactamase- and AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in dairy farms Netherlands None 10530 10530 Clinical illness Presence of clinical mastitis during dry period Yes No Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False 16 16 40 24 None None None None None None None None None None None
11155 11155 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10065 10065 Retail outlet Cottage processor vs supermarket. Cottage poultry processors = roadside establishments that slaughter and process poultry for consumers on request. Supermarkets sell chilled/frozen chicken that are slaughtered + processed at formal processing plants. Cottage processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 100.00 None 97.50 None 100 100 None None None None None
11156 11156 10059 None 11654 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.10.006 Medhanie2016 On-farm starling populations and other environmental and management factors associated with the presence of cefotaxime and ciprofloxacin resistant E. coli among dairy cattle in Ohio United States of America Observational 10154 10154 Farm environment Presence or Absence of starlings Presence of starlings Absence of starlings Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.46 0.24 0.90 0.023 None
11157 11157 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10065 10065 Retail outlet Cottage processor vs supermarket. Cottage poultry processors = roadside establishments that slaughter and process poultry for consumers on request. Supermarkets sell chilled/frozen chicken that are slaughtered + processed at formal processing plants. Cottage processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines doxycycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 98.90 None 100.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11158 11158 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10065 10065 Retail outlet Cottage processor vs supermarket. Cottage poultry processors = roadside establishments that slaughter and process poultry for consumers on request. Supermarkets sell chilled/frozen chicken that are slaughtered + processed at formal processing plants. Cottage processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 91.60 None 90.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11159 11159 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10065 10065 Retail outlet Cottage processor vs supermarket. Cottage poultry processors = roadside establishments that slaughter and process poultry for consumers on request. Supermarkets sell chilled/frozen chicken that are slaughtered + processed at formal processing plants. Cottage processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 88.40 None 65.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11160 11160 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10065 10065 Retail outlet Cottage processor vs supermarket. Cottage poultry processors = roadside establishments that slaughter and process poultry for consumers on request. Supermarkets sell chilled/frozen chicken that are slaughtered + processed at formal processing plants. Cottage processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 84.20 None 65.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11161 11161 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10065 10065 Retail outlet Cottage processor vs supermarket. Cottage poultry processors = roadside establishments that slaughter and process poultry for consumers on request. Supermarkets sell chilled/frozen chicken that are slaughtered + processed at formal processing plants. Cottage processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 51.60 None 5.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11162 11162 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10065 10065 Retail outlet Cottage processor vs supermarket. Cottage poultry processors = roadside establishments that slaughter and process poultry for consumers on request. Supermarkets sell chilled/frozen chicken that are slaughtered + processed at formal processing plants. Cottage processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 26.50 None 7.50 None 100 100 None None None None None
11163 11163 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10065 10065 Retail outlet Cottage processor vs supermarket. Cottage poultry processors = roadside establishments that slaughter and process poultry for consumers on request. Supermarkets sell chilled/frozen chicken that are slaughtered + processed at formal processing plants. Cottage processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 15.80 None 0.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11164 11164 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10065 10065 Retail outlet Cottage processor vs supermarket. Cottage poultry processors = roadside establishments that slaughter and process poultry for consumers on request. Supermarkets sell chilled/frozen chicken that are slaughtered + processed at formal processing plants. Cottage processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 14.70 None 5.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11165 11165 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10065 10065 Retail outlet Cottage processor vs supermarket. Cottage poultry processors = roadside establishments that slaughter and process poultry for consumers on request. Supermarkets sell chilled/frozen chicken that are slaughtered + processed at formal processing plants. Cottage processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 5.30 None 0.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11166 11166 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10065 10065 Retail outlet Cottage processor vs supermarket. Cottage poultry processors = roadside establishments that slaughter and process poultry for consumers on request. Supermarkets sell chilled/frozen chicken that are slaughtered + processed at formal processing plants. Cottage processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 4.20 None 0.00 None 100 100 None None None None None
11167 11167 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10065 10065 Retail outlet Cottage processor vs supermarket. Cottage poultry processors = roadside establishments that slaughter and process poultry for consumers on request. Supermarkets sell chilled/frozen chicken that are slaughtered + processed at formal processing plants. Cottage processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 1.10 None 2.50 None 100 100 None None None None None
11168 11168 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10010 10010 Chicken production system Integrated vs nonintegrated (not defined in paper) Integrated Nonintegrated Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 10.50 None 27 76 None None None None None
11169 11169 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10010 10010 Chicken production system Integrated vs nonintegrated (not defined in paper) Integrated Nonintegrated Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 7.40 None 11.80 None 27 76 None None None None None
11170 11170 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10010 10010 Chicken production system Integrated vs nonintegrated (not defined in paper) Integrated Nonintegrated Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 18.50 None 19.70 None 27 76 None None None None None
11171 11171 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10010 10010 Chicken production system Integrated vs nonintegrated (not defined in paper) Integrated Nonintegrated Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 1.30 None 27 76 None None None None None
11172 11172 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10010 10010 Chicken production system Integrated vs nonintegrated (not defined in paper) Integrated Nonintegrated Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 7.40 None 2.60 None 27 76 None None None None None
11173 11173 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10010 10010 Chicken production system Integrated vs nonintegrated (not defined in paper) Integrated Nonintegrated Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 66.70 None 47.40 None 27 76 None None None None None
11174 11174 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10010 10010 Chicken production system Integrated vs nonintegrated (not defined in paper) Integrated Nonintegrated Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 3.70 None 0.00 None 27 76 None None None None None
11175 11175 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10010 10010 Chicken production system Integrated vs nonintegrated (not defined in paper) Integrated Nonintegrated Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 29.60 None 38.20 None 27 76 None None None None None
11176 11176 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10010 10010 Chicken production system Integrated vs nonintegrated (not defined in paper) Integrated Nonintegrated Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 33.30 None 43.40 None 27 76 None None None None None
11177 11177 10006 None 10294 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-15-117 Jarquin2015 Salmonella on raw poultry in retail markets in Guatemala: Levels, antibiotic susceptibility, and serovar distribution Guatemala Observational 10010 10010 Chicken production system Integrated vs nonintegrated (not defined in paper) Integrated Nonintegrated Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 63.00 None 28.90 None 27 76 None None None None None
11185 11185 10033 None 11091 10.3382/ps.2013-03175 Lee2013 Prevalence, characterization, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Gallinarum isolated from eggs produced in conventional or organic farms in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10080 10080 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Eggs None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 10 16 None None None None None
11187 11187 10033 None 11091 10.3382/ps.2013-03175 Lee2013 Prevalence, characterization, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Gallinarum isolated from eggs produced in conventional or organic farms in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10080 10080 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Eggs None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 10 16 None None None None None
11189 11189 10033 None 11091 10.3382/ps.2013-03175 Lee2013 Prevalence, characterization, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Gallinarum isolated from eggs produced in conventional or organic farms in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10080 10080 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Eggs None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 10 16 None None None None None
11190 11190 10033 None 11091 10.3382/ps.2013-03175 Lee2013 Prevalence, characterization, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Gallinarum isolated from eggs produced in conventional or organic farms in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10080 10080 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Eggs None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 10 16 None None None None None
11191 11191 10033 None 11091 10.3382/ps.2013-03175 Lee2013 Prevalence, characterization, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Gallinarum isolated from eggs produced in conventional or organic farms in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10080 10080 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Eggs None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 10 16 None None None None None
11192 11192 10033 None 11091 10.3382/ps.2013-03175 Lee2013 Prevalence, characterization, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Gallinarum isolated from eggs produced in conventional or organic farms in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10080 10080 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Eggs None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 10 16 None None None None None
11193 11193 10033 None 11091 10.3382/ps.2013-03175 Lee2013 Prevalence, characterization, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Gallinarum isolated from eggs produced in conventional or organic farms in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10080 10080 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Eggs None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 10 16 None None None None None
11194 11194 10033 None 11091 10.3382/ps.2013-03175 Lee2013 Prevalence, characterization, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Gallinarum isolated from eggs produced in conventional or organic farms in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10080 10080 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Eggs None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 10 16 None None None None None
11195 11195 10033 None 11091 10.3382/ps.2013-03175 Lee2013 Prevalence, characterization, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Gallinarum isolated from eggs produced in conventional or organic farms in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10080 10080 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Eggs None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 10 16 None None None None None
11196 11196 10033 None 11091 10.3382/ps.2013-03175 Lee2013 Prevalence, characterization, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Gallinarum isolated from eggs produced in conventional or organic farms in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10080 10080 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Eggs None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 10 16 None None None None None
11198 11198 10033 None 11091 10.3382/ps.2013-03175 Lee2013 Prevalence, characterization, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Gallinarum isolated from eggs produced in conventional or organic farms in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10080 10080 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Eggs None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 10 16 None None None None None
11199 11199 10033 None 11091 10.3382/ps.2013-03175 Lee2013 Prevalence, characterization, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Gallinarum isolated from eggs produced in conventional or organic farms in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10080 10080 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Eggs None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 10 16 None None None None None
11201 11201 10033 None 11091 10.3382/ps.2013-03175 Lee2013 Prevalence, characterization, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Gallinarum isolated from eggs produced in conventional or organic farms in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10080 10080 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Eggs None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 10 16 None None None None None
11202 11202 10033 None 11091 10.3382/ps.2013-03175 Lee2013 Prevalence, characterization, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Gallinarum isolated from eggs produced in conventional or organic farms in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10080 10080 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Eggs None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Isolate Quinolones norfloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 10 16 None None None None None
11204 11204 10033 None 11091 10.3382/ps.2013-03175 Lee2013 Prevalence, characterization, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Gallinarum isolated from eggs produced in conventional or organic farms in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10080 10080 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Eggs None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Isolate Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 10 16 None None None None None
11207 11207 10033 None 11091 10.3382/ps.2013-03175 Lee2013 Prevalence, characterization, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Gallinarum isolated from eggs produced in conventional or organic farms in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10080 10080 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Eggs None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 10 None 16 None None None None None 10 16 None None None None None
11216 11216 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 33 93 None None None None None
11217 11217 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 8 None None None None None 33 93 None None None None None
11218 11218 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 3 None None None None None 33 93 None None None None None
11219 11219 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 22 None 43 None None None None None 33 93 None None None None None
11220 11220 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 7 None 18 None None None None None 33 93 None None None None None
11221 11221 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False 3 None 18 None None None None None 33 93 None None None None None
11222 11222 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. False None False 5 None 19 None None None None None 33 93 None None None None None
11224 11224 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 33 93 None None None None None
11226 11226 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Salmonella spp. False None False 3 None 18 None None None None None 33 93 None None None None None
11228 11228 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. False None False 3 None 0 None None None None None 33 93 None None None None None
11229 11229 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Salmonella spp. False None False 14 None 33 None None None None None 33 93 None None None None None
11230 11230 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 4 None None None None None 33 93 None None None None None
11231 11231 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 33 93 None None None None None
11232 11232 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 33 93 None None None None None
11233 11233 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 21 None 39 None None None None None 33 93 None None None None None
11236 11236 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 18 4 38 27 None None None None 24 68 None None None None None
11242 11242 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 21 4 45 27 None None None None 24 68 None None None None None
11245 11245 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Salmonella spp. False None False 10 4 22 27 None None None None 24 68 None None None None None
11249 11249 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. False None False 2 4 0 27 None None None None 24 68 None None None None None
11250 11250 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. False None False 2 4 19 27 None None None None 24 68 None None None None None
11251 11251 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 4 3 27 None None None None 24 68 None None None None None
11252 11252 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 4 4 27 None None None None 24 68 None None None None None
11253 11253 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 4 4 18 27 None None None None 24 68 None None None None None
11254 11254 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 4 0 27 None None None None 24 68 None None None None None
11255 11255 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 4 18 27 None None None None 24 68 None None None None None
11256 11256 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 4 18 27 None None None None 24 68 None None None None None
11257 11257 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 4 3 27 None None None None 24 68 None None None None None
11259 11259 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 33 93 None None None None None
11260 11260 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False 3 None 5 None None None None None 33 93 None None None None None
11261 11261 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False 6 None 18 None None None None None 33 93 None None None None None
11262 11262 10037 None 11126 10.4315/0362-028x-72.6.1165 Lestari2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella serovars In conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores United States of America Observational 10084 10084 Production type Organic vs conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. False None False 17 None 38 None None None None None 33 93 None None None None None
11264 11264 10151 None 8697 10.1046/j.1472-765x.1999.00634.x Davies1999 Antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci recovered from commercial swine carcasses: Effect of feed additives United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10403 10403 Grower feed - Avilamycin and tylosin used as growth promoter in feed ‘growth promoter’ pigs were fed a grower feed containing 20 g/tonne avilamycin for two feeds, followed by a grower ration containing 40 g/tonne tylosin Grower feed Control feed Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 5 None 12 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
11265 11265 10151 None 8697 10.1046/j.1472-765x.1999.00634.x Davies1999 Antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci recovered from commercial swine carcasses: Effect of feed additives United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10403 10403 Grower feed - Avilamycin and tylosin used as growth promoter in feed ‘growth promoter’ pigs were fed a grower feed containing 20 g/tonne avilamycin for two feeds, followed by a grower ration containing 40 g/tonne tylosin Grower feed Control feed Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Antibiotics avilamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
11266 11266 10081 None 12373 10.3382/ps/pex055 Park2017 Comparison of the isolation rates and characteristics of Salmonella isolated from antibiotic-free and conventional chicken meat samples Republic of Korea Observational 10221 10221 Production type Antibiotic-free vs conventional broiler chickens Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 16 None 11 None None None None None 16 11 None None None None None
11267 11267 10081 None 12373 10.3382/ps/pex055 Park2017 Comparison of the isolation rates and characteristics of Salmonella isolated from antibiotic-free and conventional chicken meat samples Republic of Korea Observational 10221 10221 Production type Antibiotic-free vs conventional broiler chickens Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False 2 None 0 None None None None None 16 11 None None None None None
11268 11268 10081 None 12373 10.3382/ps/pex055 Park2017 Comparison of the isolation rates and characteristics of Salmonella isolated from antibiotic-free and conventional chicken meat samples Republic of Korea Observational 10221 10221 Production type Antibiotic-free vs conventional broiler chickens Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Salmonella spp. False None False 15 None 11 None None None None None 16 11 None None None None None
11269 11269 10081 None 12373 10.3382/ps/pex055 Park2017 Comparison of the isolation rates and characteristics of Salmonella isolated from antibiotic-free and conventional chicken meat samples Republic of Korea Observational 10221 10221 Production type Antibiotic-free vs conventional broiler chickens Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Salmonella spp. False None False 2 None 0 None None None None None 16 11 None None None None None
11270 11270 10081 None 12373 10.3382/ps/pex055 Park2017 Comparison of the isolation rates and characteristics of Salmonella isolated from antibiotic-free and conventional chicken meat samples Republic of Korea Observational 10221 10221 Production type Antibiotic-free vs conventional broiler chickens Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Salmonella spp. False None False 13 None 11 None None None None None 16 11 None None None None None
11271 11271 10081 None 12373 10.3382/ps/pex055 Park2017 Comparison of the isolation rates and characteristics of Salmonella isolated from antibiotic-free and conventional chicken meat samples Republic of Korea Observational 10221 10221 Production type Antibiotic-free vs conventional broiler chickens Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftazidime None Salmonella spp. False None False 14 None 11 None None None None None 16 11 None None None None None
11272 11272 10081 None 12373 10.3382/ps/pex055 Park2017 Comparison of the isolation rates and characteristics of Salmonella isolated from antibiotic-free and conventional chicken meat samples Republic of Korea Observational 10221 10221 Production type Antibiotic-free vs conventional broiler chickens Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Fourth-generation cephalosporins cefepime None Salmonella spp. False None False 10 None 11 None None None None None 16 11 None None None None None
11273 11273 10081 None 12373 10.3382/ps/pex055 Park2017 Comparison of the isolation rates and characteristics of Salmonella isolated from antibiotic-free and conventional chicken meat samples Republic of Korea Observational 10221 10221 Production type Antibiotic-free vs conventional broiler chickens Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Monobactams aztreonam None Salmonella spp. False None False 13 None 11 None None None None None 16 11 None None None None None
11274 11274 10081 None 12373 10.3382/ps/pex055 Park2017 Comparison of the isolation rates and characteristics of Salmonella isolated from antibiotic-free and conventional chicken meat samples Republic of Korea Observational 10221 10221 Production type Antibiotic-free vs conventional broiler chickens Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 4 None None None None None 16 11 None None None None None
11275 11275 10081 None 12373 10.3382/ps/pex055 Park2017 Comparison of the isolation rates and characteristics of Salmonella isolated from antibiotic-free and conventional chicken meat samples Republic of Korea Observational 10222 10222 Production type Presence of CTX-M-15 gene in ESBL-producing Salmonella isolates from antibiotic-free vs conventional broiler chickens Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None None See gene column CTX-M-15 Salmonella spp. False None False 11 None 7 None None None None None 11 7 None None None None None
11276 11276 10156 None 8809 10.1128/aac.05617-11 Dheilly2012 Resistance gene transfer during treatments for experimental avian colibacillosis France Experimental 10408 10408 Oxytetracycline treatment APEC-OTC - Oxytetracycline in water (20 mg/kg), days 21–23. Compared to NINT (unchallenged, no treatment). Oxytetracycline treatment Unchallenged, Non-treated (NINT) Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 20 0 8 12 None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
11277 11277 10156 None 8809 10.1128/aac.05617-11 Dheilly2012 Resistance gene transfer during treatments for experimental avian colibacillosis France Experimental 10410 10410 Sulfadimethoxine-trimethoprim treatment APEC-SXT - Sulfadimethoxine-trimethoprim in water (28 and 6mg/kg), days 21–25. Compared to NINT (unchallenged, no treatment). Sulfadimethoxine-trimethoprim treatment Unchallenged, Non-treated (NINT) Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 16 4 8 12 None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
11279 11279 10156 None 8809 10.1128/aac.05617-11 Dheilly2012 Resistance gene transfer during treatments for experimental avian colibacillosis France Experimental 10406 10406 Enrofloxacin treatment APEC-ENR - Enrofloxacin (10 mg/kg), days 21–25. Compared to NINT (unchallenged, no treatment). Enrofloxacin treatment Unchallenged, Non-treated (NINT) Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 6 14 8 12 None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
11280 11280 10115 None 13358 10.1637/1933-5334(2007)2[e17:ciopaa]2.0.co;2 Siemon2007 Comparative Investigation of Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella between Pasture and Conventionally Reared Poultry United States of America Observational 10326 10326 Production type Pasture vs conventional poultry farms Pasture Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 12 93 67 120 None None None None 162 188 None None None None None
11281 11281 10115 None 13358 10.1637/1933-5334(2007)2[e17:ciopaa]2.0.co;2 Siemon2007 Comparative Investigation of Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella between Pasture and Conventionally Reared Poultry United States of America Observational 10326 10326 Production type Pasture vs conventional poultry farms Pasture Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False 12 93 67 120 None None None None 162 188 None None None None None
11282 11282 10115 None 13358 10.1637/1933-5334(2007)2[e17:ciopaa]2.0.co;2 Siemon2007 Comparative Investigation of Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella between Pasture and Conventionally Reared Poultry United States of America Observational 10326 10326 Production type Pasture vs conventional poultry farms Pasture Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 7 93 67 120 None None None None 162 188 None None None None None
11283 11283 10115 None 13358 10.1637/1933-5334(2007)2[e17:ciopaa]2.0.co;2 Siemon2007 Comparative Investigation of Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella between Pasture and Conventionally Reared Poultry United States of America Observational 10326 10326 Production type Pasture vs conventional poultry farms Pasture Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Salmonella spp. False None False 2 93 67 120 None None None None 162 188 None None None None None
11284 11284 10115 None 13358 10.1637/1933-5334(2007)2[e17:ciopaa]2.0.co;2 Siemon2007 Comparative Investigation of Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella between Pasture and Conventionally Reared Poultry United States of America Observational 10326 10326 Production type Pasture vs conventional poultry farms Pasture Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 2 93 67 120 None None None None 162 188 None None None None None
11285 11285 10115 None 13358 10.1637/1933-5334(2007)2[e17:ciopaa]2.0.co;2 Siemon2007 Comparative Investigation of Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella between Pasture and Conventionally Reared Poultry United States of America Observational 10326 10326 Production type Pasture vs conventional poultry farms Pasture Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False 12 93 63 120 None None None None 162 188 None None None None None
11286 11286 10115 None 13358 10.1637/1933-5334(2007)2[e17:ciopaa]2.0.co;2 Siemon2007 Comparative Investigation of Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella between Pasture and Conventionally Reared Poultry United States of America Observational 10326 10326 Production type Pasture vs conventional poultry farms Pasture Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella spp. False None False 11 93 2 120 None None None None 162 188 None None None None None
11287 11287 10115 None 13358 10.1637/1933-5334(2007)2[e17:ciopaa]2.0.co;2 Siemon2007 Comparative Investigation of Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella between Pasture and Conventionally Reared Poultry United States of America Observational 10326 10326 Production type Pasture vs conventional poultry farms Pasture Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False 12 93 0 120 None None None None 162 188 None None None None None
11288 11288 10115 None 13358 10.1637/1933-5334(2007)2[e17:ciopaa]2.0.co;2 Siemon2007 Comparative Investigation of Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella between Pasture and Conventionally Reared Poultry United States of America Observational 10326 10326 Production type Pasture vs conventional poultry farms Pasture Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 2 93 1 120 None None None None 162 188 None None None None None
11289 11289 10115 None 13358 10.1637/1933-5334(2007)2[e17:ciopaa]2.0.co;2 Siemon2007 Comparative Investigation of Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella between Pasture and Conventionally Reared Poultry United States of America Observational 10326 10326 Production type Pasture vs conventional poultry farms Pasture Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False 2 93 0 120 None None None None 162 188 None None None None None
11291 11291 10055 None 11597 10.3168/jds.2017-13040 Maynou2017a Effects of feeding pasteurized waste milk to dairy calves on phenotypes and genotypes of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli isolates before and after weaning United States of America Experimental 10146 10146 Calf management Calves fed pasteurized waste milk Vs. milk replacer Pasteurized waste milk Milk replacer Cattle None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia None False None False None None None None 45.00 None 9.60 None 45 30 None None None None None
11295 11295 10206 None 9844 10.1128/aem.02979-05 Hasman2006 Copper resistance in Enterococcus faecium, mediated by the tcrB gene, is selected by supplementation of pig feed with copper sulfate Denmark Experimental 10571 10571 High-Copper feed High-copper diet pigs (fed 175 ppm copper sulfate) compared to low-copper diet (fed 6 ppm copper sulfate). High copper diet Low copper diet Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 80.00 None 20.00 None 188 168 None None None None None
11297 11297 10206 None 9844 10.1128/aem.02979-05 Hasman2006 Copper resistance in Enterococcus faecium, mediated by the tcrB gene, is selected by supplementation of pig feed with copper sulfate Denmark Experimental 10571 10571 High-Copper feed High-copper diet pigs (fed 175 ppm copper sulfate) compared to low-copper diet (fed 6 ppm copper sulfate). High copper diet Low copper diet Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 24 None 0 None None None None None 188 168 None None None None None
11298 11298 10206 None 9844 10.1128/aem.02979-05 Hasman2006 Copper resistance in Enterococcus faecium, mediated by the tcrB gene, is selected by supplementation of pig feed with copper sulfate Denmark Experimental 10571 10571 High-Copper feed High-copper diet pigs (fed 175 ppm copper sulfate) compared to low-copper diet (fed 6 ppm copper sulfate). High copper diet Low copper diet Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Antidotes copper sulfate None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None 28.00 None 49.00 188 168 None None None None None
11299 11299 10124 None 13840 Thibodeau2008 Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolates from commercial broiler chickens receiving growth-promoting doses of bacitracin or virginiamycin Canada Experimental 10351 10351 Zinc bacitracin use Zinc bacitracin (55 ppm) added to feed of standard commercial vegetal soy-corn diet for 34 days Zinc bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 43.00 None 15.70 None 34 34 None None None None None
11300 11300 10124 None 13840 Thibodeau2008 Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolates from commercial broiler chickens receiving growth-promoting doses of bacitracin or virginiamycin Canada Experimental 10350 10350 Virginamycin use Virginamycin (22 ppm) added to feed of standard commercial vegetal soy-corn diet for 34 days Virginamycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.00 None 1.00 None 34 34 None None None None None
11301 11301 10124 None 13840 Thibodeau2008 Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolates from commercial broiler chickens receiving growth-promoting doses of bacitracin or virginiamycin Canada Experimental 10351 10351 Zinc bacitracin use Zinc bacitracin (55 ppm) added to feed of standard commercial vegetal soy-corn diet for 34 days Zinc bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides apramycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 97.00 None 91.30 None 34 34 None None None None None
11302 11302 10124 None 13840 Thibodeau2008 Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolates from commercial broiler chickens receiving growth-promoting doses of bacitracin or virginiamycin Canada Experimental 10351 10351 Zinc bacitracin use Zinc bacitracin (55 ppm) added to feed of standard commercial vegetal soy-corn diet for 34 days Zinc bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials bacitracin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 98.00 None 67.00 None 34 34 None None None None None
11303 11303 10124 None 13840 Thibodeau2008 Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolates from commercial broiler chickens receiving growth-promoting doses of bacitracin or virginiamycin Canada Experimental 10351 10351 Zinc bacitracin use Zinc bacitracin (55 ppm) added to feed of standard commercial vegetal soy-corn diet for 34 days Zinc bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 81.00 None 72.70 None 34 34 None None None None None
11304 11304 10124 None 13840 Thibodeau2008 Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolates from commercial broiler chickens receiving growth-promoting doses of bacitracin or virginiamycin Canada Experimental 10351 10351 Zinc bacitracin use Zinc bacitracin (55 ppm) added to feed of standard commercial vegetal soy-corn diet for 34 days Zinc bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 91.00 None 90.70 None 34 34 None None None None None
11305 11305 10124 None 13840 Thibodeau2008 Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolates from commercial broiler chickens receiving growth-promoting doses of bacitracin or virginiamycin Canada Experimental 10351 10351 Zinc bacitracin use Zinc bacitracin (55 ppm) added to feed of standard commercial vegetal soy-corn diet for 34 days Zinc bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Streptogramins virginiamycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 86.70 None 79.30 None 34 34 None None None None None
11306 11306 10124 None 13840 Thibodeau2008 Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolates from commercial broiler chickens receiving growth-promoting doses of bacitracin or virginiamycin Canada Experimental 10351 10351 Zinc bacitracin use Zinc bacitracin (55 ppm) added to feed of standard commercial vegetal soy-corn diet for 34 days Zinc bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 97.50 None 94.00 None 34 34 None None None None None
11307 11307 10124 None 13840 Thibodeau2008 Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolates from commercial broiler chickens receiving growth-promoting doses of bacitracin or virginiamycin Canada Experimental 10350 10350 Virginamycin use Virginamycin (22 ppm) added to feed of standard commercial vegetal soy-corn diet for 34 days Virginamycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides apramycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 91.30 None 91.30 None 34 34 None None None None None
11308 11308 10124 None 13840 Thibodeau2008 Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolates from commercial broiler chickens receiving growth-promoting doses of bacitracin or virginiamycin Canada Experimental 10350 10350 Virginamycin use Virginamycin (22 ppm) added to feed of standard commercial vegetal soy-corn diet for 34 days Virginamycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials bacitracin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 77.70 None 67.00 None 34 34 None None None None None
11309 11309 10124 None 13840 Thibodeau2008 Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolates from commercial broiler chickens receiving growth-promoting doses of bacitracin or virginiamycin Canada Experimental 10350 10350 Virginamycin use Virginamycin (22 ppm) added to feed of standard commercial vegetal soy-corn diet for 34 days Virginamycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 86.00 None 72.70 None 34 34 None None None None None
11310 11310 10124 None 13840 Thibodeau2008 Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolates from commercial broiler chickens receiving growth-promoting doses of bacitracin or virginiamycin Canada Experimental 10350 10350 Virginamycin use Virginamycin (22 ppm) added to feed of standard commercial vegetal soy-corn diet for 34 days Virginamycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 95.00 None 91.30 None 34 34 None None None None None
11311 11311 10124 None 13840 Thibodeau2008 Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolates from commercial broiler chickens receiving growth-promoting doses of bacitracin or virginiamycin Canada Experimental 10350 10350 Virginamycin use Virginamycin (22 ppm) added to feed of standard commercial vegetal soy-corn diet for 34 days Virginamycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 93.70 None 90.70 None 34 34 None None None None None
11312 11312 10124 None 13840 Thibodeau2008 Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolates from commercial broiler chickens receiving growth-promoting doses of bacitracin or virginiamycin Canada Experimental 10349 10349 Virginamycin use Virginamycin (22 ppm) added to feed of standard commercial vegetal soy-corn diet for 34 days Virginamycin use None Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 34 34 None None None None None
11313 11313 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10597 10597 Use of farm management software Use of farm management software Use of farm management software No use of farm management software Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.57 None None 0.32 None
11314 11314 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10581 10581 Farm kept hand written documentation Farm kept hand written documentation Hand written documentation No hand written documentation Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.40 None None 0.095 None
11315 11315 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10590 10590 Number of sows More than 0 sows on the farm vs no sows More than 0 sows No sows Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.45 None None 0.182 None
11316 11316 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10596 10596 Type of farm Type of farm breeding and fattening farm fattening farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.45 None None 0.182 None
11317 11317 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10592 10592 Origin of pigs Origin of pigs Buying from more than one parentage No buying/buying from one parentage Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.81 None None 0.052 None
11318 11318 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10586 10586 Moving single pigs Moving single pigs Yes - moving single pigs No - not moving single pigs Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.93 None None 0.015 None
11319 11319 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10593 10593 Separate pen for diseased pigs Separate pen for diseased pigs Yes - separate pen for diseased pigs No separate pen for diseased pigs Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.14 None None 0.109 None
11320 11320 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10587 10587 No keeping of pigs left over was there keeping of pigs left over? Yes: There was no keeping of pigs left over No: there was keeping of pigs left over Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.78 None None 0.215 None
11321 11321 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10591 10591 Origin of feed Origin of feed Just purchased In-house/partly purchased Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.40 None None 0.082 None
11322 11322 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10585 10585 Liquid feeding Liquid feeding Yes - liquid feeding No liquid feeding Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.78 None None 0.198 None
11323 11323 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10594 10594 Structure of feed = flour Was the structure of feed flour? Yes - flour structure feed No flour structure feed Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.51 None None 0.128 None
11324 11324 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10598 10598 Waterbirds within 1 km radius of farm? Were there waterbirds within 1 km radius of farm? Yes - waterbirds within 1km radius of farm No waterbirds within 1km radius of farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.92 None None 0.16 None
11325 11325 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10574 10574 Disinfection of pen separations Disinfection of pen separations Yes - disinfection of pen separations No disinfection of pen separations Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 5.51 None None 0.029 None
11326 11326 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10577 10577 Disinfection of wall at height of animals Disinfection of wall at height of animals Yes - disinfection of wall at height of animals No disinfection of wall at height of animals Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.58 None None 0.146 None
11327 11327 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10575 10575 Disinfection of the drinker Disinfection of the drinker Yes - disinfection of the drinker No disinfection of the drinker Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.65 None None 0.065 None
11328 11328 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10576 10576 Disinfection of the feeding-trough Disinfection of the feeding-trough Yes - disinfection of the feeding-trough No disinfection of the feeding-trough Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.65 None None 0.065 None
11329 11329 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10578 10578 Disinfection with chlorine Disinfection with chlorine Yes - disinfection with chlorine No disinfection with chlorine Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.19 None None 0.209 None
11330 11330 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10573 10573 Controlling flies with toxin Controlling flies with toxin Yes - controlling flies with toxin No controlling flies with toxin Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.07 None None 0.016 None
11331 11331 10117 None 13477 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.009 Snow2012 Risk factors associated with extended spectrum beta-lactamase Escherichia coli (CTX-M) on dairy farms in North West England and North Wales United States of America Observational 10339 10339 Farm hygiene Slurry stored in pit Slurry stored in pit Slurry not stored in pit Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 9 7 18 31 None None None None None None None None None None None
11332 11332 10117 None 13477 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.009 Snow2012 Risk factors associated with extended spectrum beta-lactamase Escherichia coli (CTX-M) on dairy farms in North West England and North Wales United States of America Observational 10337 10337 Cattle bedding Sawdust used for cattle bedding yes no Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 18 17 9 21 None None None None None None None None None None None
11333 11333 10117 None 13477 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.009 Snow2012 Risk factors associated with extended spectrum beta-lactamase Escherichia coli (CTX-M) on dairy farms in North West England and North Wales United States of America Observational 10338 10338 Farm hygiene Feed equipment disinfected between calves Yes no Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 2 10 25 28 None None None None None None None None None None None
11334 11334 10117 None 13477 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.009 Snow2012 Risk factors associated with extended spectrum beta-lactamase Escherichia coli (CTX-M) on dairy farms in North West England and North Wales United States of America Observational 10336 10336 Calf diet Waste milk fed to calves yes no Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 15 28 12 10 None None None None None None None None None None None
11336 11336 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10417 10417 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 14 None 17 None None None None None 14 19 None None None None None
11337 11337 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10417 10417 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 14 None 17 None None None None None 14 19 None None None None None
11338 11338 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10417 10417 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 17 None None None None None 14 19 None None None None None
11339 11339 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10417 10417 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 17 None None None None None 14 19 None None None None None
11340 11340 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10417 10417 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 17 None None None None None 14 19 None None None None None
11341 11341 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10417 10417 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 13 None None None None None 14 19 None None None None None
11342 11342 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10417 10417 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 11 None None None None None 14 19 None None None None None
11343 11343 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10417 10417 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 7 None None None None None 14 19 None None None None None
11344 11344 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10417 10417 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides, plain and in combinations sulfadimethoxine None Escherichia coli False None False 10 None 12 None None None None None 14 19 None None None None None
11345 11345 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10417 10417 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfathiazole None Escherichia coli False None False 10 None 12 None None None None None 14 19 None None None None None
11346 11346 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10417 10417 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 12 None None None None None 14 19 None None None None None
11347 11347 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10417 10417 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 2 None None None None None 14 19 None None None None None
11348 11348 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10417 10417 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 10 None None None None None 14 19 None None None None None
11349 11349 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10417 10417 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 2 None None None None None 14 19 None None None None None
11350 11350 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10417 10417 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones sarafloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 2 None None None None None 14 19 None None None None None
11351 11351 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10417 10417 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 14 19 None None None None None
11352 11352 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10417 10417 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 14 19 None None None None None
11353 11353 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10420 10420 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 17 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11354 11354 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10420 10420 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 17 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11355 11355 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10420 10420 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 17 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11356 11356 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10420 10420 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 17 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11357 11357 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10420 10420 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 14 None 17 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11358 11358 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10420 10420 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 13 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11359 11359 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10420 10420 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 11 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11360 11360 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10420 10420 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 7 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11361 11361 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10420 10420 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides, plain and in combinations sulfadimethoxine None Escherichia coli False None False 10 None 12 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11362 11362 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10420 10420 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfathiazole None Escherichia coli False None False 10 None 12 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11363 11363 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10420 10420 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False 10 None 12 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11364 11364 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10420 10420 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11365 11365 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10420 10420 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 10 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11366 11366 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10420 10420 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 2 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11367 11367 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10420 10420 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones sarafloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 2 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11368 11368 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10420 10420 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 0 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11369 11369 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10420 10420 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 0 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11370 11370 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10424 10424 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 20 None 17 None None None None None 20 19 None None None None None
11371 11371 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10424 10424 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 19 None 17 None None None None None 20 19 None None None None None
11372 11372 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10424 10424 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 19 None 17 None None None None None 20 19 None None None None None
11373 11373 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10424 10424 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 19 None 17 None None None None None 20 19 None None None None None
11374 11374 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10424 10424 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 19 None 14 None None None None None 20 19 None None None None None
11375 11375 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10424 10424 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 13 None None None None None 20 19 None None None None None
11376 11376 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10424 10424 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 11 None None None None None 20 19 None None None None None
11377 11377 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10424 10424 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 7 None None None None None 20 19 None None None None None
11378 11378 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10584 10584 Fully slatted floor Fully slatted floor Yes - Fully slatted floor Floor not fully slatted Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.69 None None 0.109 None
11379 11379 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10580 10580 Exhaust ventilation (under floor vs over floor) Under floor vs over floor Under floor exhaust ventilation Over floor exhaust ventilation Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.33 None None 0.067 None
11380 11380 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10579 10579 Exhaust ventilation (none vs over floor) No ventilation vs over floor No ventilation system Over floor exhaust ventilation Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.75 None None 0.754 None
11381 11381 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10589 10589 Number of pigs per compartment (116-230 vs >230) 116-230 vs >230 pigs per compartment 116-230 pigs per compartment Over 230 pigs per compartment Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.83 None None 0.664 None
11382 11382 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10588 10588 Number of pigs per compartment (<=115 vs >230) <=115 vs >230 pigs per compartment <=115 pigs per compartment Over 230 pigs per compartment Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.42 None None 0.05 None
11383 11383 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10595 10595 Treatment of investigated group with antibiotics Treatment of investigated group with antibiotics Yes - Treatment of investigated group with antibiotics No treatment of investigated group with antibiotics Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.69 None None 0.097 None
11384 11384 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10424 10424 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides, plain and in combinations sulfadimethoxine None Escherichia coli False None False 17 None 12 None None None None None 20 19 None None None None None
11385 11385 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10424 10424 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfathiazole None Escherichia coli False None False 17 None 12 None None None None None 20 19 None None None None None
11386 11386 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10424 10424 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 12 None None None None None 20 19 None None None None None
11387 11387 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10424 10424 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 2 None None None None None 20 19 None None None None None
11388 11388 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10424 10424 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 10 None None None None None 20 19 None None None None None
11389 11389 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10424 10424 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 2 None None None None None 20 19 None None None None None
11390 11390 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10424 10424 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones sarafloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 2 None None None None None 20 19 None None None None None
11391 11391 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10424 10424 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 19 None None None None None
11392 11392 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10424 10424 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 19 None None None None None
11393 11393 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10414 10414 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 17 None None None None None 19 19 None None None None None
11394 11394 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10414 10414 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 17 None None None None None 19 19 None None None None None
11395 11395 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10414 10414 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 17 None None None None None 19 19 None None None None None
11396 11396 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10414 10414 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 14 None 17 None None None None None 19 19 None None None None None
11397 11397 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10414 10414 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 14 None None None None None 19 19 None None None None None
11398 11398 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10414 10414 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 13 None None None None None 19 19 None None None None None
11399 11399 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10414 10414 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 11 None None None None None 19 19 None None None None None
11400 11400 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10414 10414 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 7 None None None None None 19 19 None None None None None
11401 11401 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10414 10414 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides, plain and in combinations sulfadimethoxine None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 12 None None None None None 19 19 None None None None None
11402 11402 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10414 10414 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfathiazole None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 12 None None None None None 19 19 None None None None None
11403 11403 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10414 10414 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 12 None None None None None 19 19 None None None None None
11404 11404 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10414 10414 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 2 None None None None None 19 19 None None None None None
11405 11405 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10414 10414 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 10 None None None None None 19 19 None None None None None
11406 11406 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10414 10414 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 2 None None None None None 19 19 None None None None None
11407 11407 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10414 10414 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones sarafloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 2 None None None None None 19 19 None None None None None
11408 11408 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10414 10414 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 19 19 None None None None None
11409 11409 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10414 10414 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 19 19 None None None None None
11410 11410 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10412 10412 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 17 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11411 11411 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10412 10412 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 17 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11412 11412 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10412 10412 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 17 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11413 11413 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10412 10412 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 17 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11414 11414 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10412 10412 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 14 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11415 11415 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10412 10412 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 7 None 13 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11416 11416 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10412 10412 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 11 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11417 11417 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10412 10412 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 7 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11418 11418 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10412 10412 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides, plain and in combinations sulfadimethoxine None Escherichia coli False None False 7 None 12 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11419 11419 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10412 10412 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfathiazole None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 12 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11420 11420 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10412 10412 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 12 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11421 11421 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10412 10412 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11422 11422 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10412 10412 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 10 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11423 11423 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10412 10412 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 2 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11424 11424 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10412 10412 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones sarafloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 2 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11425 11425 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10412 10412 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11426 11426 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10412 10412 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Selected for tetracycline-resistant E. coli isolates. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 16 19 None None None None None
11430 11430 10165 None 8979 10.3201/eid1601.090729 Dutil2010 Ceftiofur resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg from chicken meat and humans, Canada Canada Observational 10487 10487 Ceftiofur use Voluntary withdrawal of ceftiofur in ovo use from 2005 to 2006 in Quebec, Canada. Compare prevalence of ceftiofur resistance from 2004 and 2006 No use Ceftiofur use Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 18 None None None None None 14 29 None None None None None
11431 11431 10165 None 8979 10.3201/eid1601.090729 Dutil2010 Ceftiofur resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg from chicken meat and humans, Canada Canada Observational 10486 10486 Ceftiofur use Voluntary withdrawal of ceftiofur in ovo use from 2005 to 2006 in Quebec, Canada. Compare prevalence of ceftiofur resistance from 2004 and 2006 No use Ceftiofur use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 54 None None None None None 135 158 None None None None None
11433 11433 10209 None 9908 10.1093/jac/dkh508 Hershberger2005 Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin United States of America Observational 10608 10608 Use of streptogramins (Virginiamycin) Farmers reported usual use of antibiotics through questionnaire (amount not specified) Virginiamycin use No use Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 56 None 6 None None None None None 57 16 None None None None None
11434 11434 10186 None 9304 10.3382/ps.0602441 Ford1981 Influence of salinomycin on incidence, shedding, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella typhimurium in experimentally infected broiler chicks. United States of America Experimental 10508 10508 Salinomycin use 80g/ton salinomycin in feed from days 5 to 47. Results from 7 samplings. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 27 None 32 None None None None None 393 366 None None None None None
11435 11435 10186 None 9304 10.3382/ps.0602441 Ford1981 Influence of salinomycin on incidence, shedding, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella typhimurium in experimentally infected broiler chicks. United States of America Experimental 10508 10508 Salinomycin use 80g/ton salinomycin in feed from days 5 to 47. Results from 7 samplings. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 370 None 335 None None None None None 393 366 None None None None None
11436 11436 10186 None 9304 10.3382/ps.0602441 Ford1981 Influence of salinomycin on incidence, shedding, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella typhimurium in experimentally infected broiler chicks. United States of America Experimental 10508 10508 Salinomycin use 80g/ton salinomycin in feed from days 5 to 47. Results from 7 samplings. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 39 None 54 None None None None None 393 366 None None None None None
11437 11437 10186 None 9304 10.3382/ps.0602441 Ford1981 Influence of salinomycin on incidence, shedding, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella typhimurium in experimentally infected broiler chicks. United States of America Experimental 10508 10508 Salinomycin use 80g/ton salinomycin in feed from days 5 to 47. Results from 7 samplings. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Salmonella spp. False None False 24 None 41 None None None None None 393 366 None None None None None
11438 11438 10186 None 9304 10.3382/ps.0602441 Ford1981 Influence of salinomycin on incidence, shedding, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella typhimurium in experimentally infected broiler chicks. United States of America Experimental 10508 10508 Salinomycin use 80g/ton salinomycin in feed from days 5 to 47. Results from 7 samplings. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 6 None 5 None None None None None 393 366 None None None None None
11439 11439 10186 None 9304 10.3382/ps.0602441 Ford1981 Influence of salinomycin on incidence, shedding, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella typhimurium in experimentally infected broiler chicks. United States of America Experimental 10508 10508 Salinomycin use 80g/ton salinomycin in feed from days 5 to 47. Results from 7 samplings. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins carbenicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 33 None 50 None None None None None 393 366 None None None None None
11440 11440 10186 None 9304 10.3382/ps.0602441 Ford1981 Influence of salinomycin on incidence, shedding, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella typhimurium in experimentally infected broiler chicks. United States of America Experimental 10508 10508 Salinomycin use 80g/ton salinomycin in feed from days 5 to 47. Results from 7 samplings. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfadiazine None Salmonella spp. False None False 386 None 359 None None None None None 393 366 None None None None None
11441 11441 10186 None 9304 10.3382/ps.0602441 Ford1981 Influence of salinomycin on incidence, shedding, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella typhimurium in experimentally infected broiler chicks. United States of America Experimental 10508 10508 Salinomycin use 80g/ton salinomycin in feed from days 5 to 47. Results from 7 samplings. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False 11 None 26 None None None None None 393 366 None None None None None
11442 11442 10186 None 9304 10.3382/ps.0602441 Ford1981 Influence of salinomycin on incidence, shedding, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella typhimurium in experimentally infected broiler chicks. United States of America Experimental 10508 10508 Salinomycin use 80g/ton salinomycin in feed from days 5 to 47. Results from 7 samplings. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella spp. False None False 28 None 44 None None None None None 393 366 None None None None None
11443 11443 10186 None 9304 10.3382/ps.0602441 Ford1981 Influence of salinomycin on incidence, shedding, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella typhimurium in experimentally infected broiler chicks. United States of America Experimental 10508 10508 Salinomycin use 80g/ton salinomycin in feed from days 5 to 47. Results from 7 samplings. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. False None False 392 None 366 None None None None None 393 366 None None None None None
11444 11444 10186 None 9304 10.3382/ps.0602441 Ford1981 Influence of salinomycin on incidence, shedding, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella typhimurium in experimentally infected broiler chicks. United States of America Experimental 10508 10508 Salinomycin use 80g/ton salinomycin in feed from days 5 to 47. Results from 7 samplings. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False 5 None 4 None None None None None 393 366 None None None None None
11445 11445 10186 None 9304 10.3382/ps.0602441 Ford1981 Influence of salinomycin on incidence, shedding, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella typhimurium in experimentally infected broiler chicks. United States of America Experimental 10508 10508 Salinomycin use 80g/ton salinomycin in feed from days 5 to 47. Results from 7 samplings. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. False None False 5 None 5 None None None None None 393 366 None None None None None
11453 11453 10209 None 9908 10.1093/jac/dkh508 Hershberger2005 Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin United States of America Observational 10609 10609 Use of streptogramins (Virginiamycin) Farmers reported usual use of antibiotics through questionnaire (amount not specified) Virginiamycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 54 None 20 None None None None None 71 71 None None None None None
11454 11454 10209 None 9908 10.1093/jac/dkh508 Hershberger2005 Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin United States of America Observational 10602 10602 Use of aminoglycosides Farmers reported usual use of antibiotics through questionnaire (amount not specified) Use of aminoglycosides No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 39 None 3 None None None None None 301 323 None None None None None
11455 11455 10209 None 9908 10.1093/jac/dkh508 Hershberger2005 Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin United States of America Observational 10601 10601 Use of aminoglycosides Farmers reported usual use of antibiotics through questionnaire (amount not specified) Use of aminoglycosides No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 4 None 0 None None None None None 137 146 None None None None None
11456 11456 10209 None 9908 10.1093/jac/dkh508 Hershberger2005 Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin United States of America Observational 10600 10600 Use of aminoglycosides Farmers reported usual use of antibiotics through questionnaire (amount not specified) Use of aminoglycosides No use Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 1 None 8 None None None None None 14 59 None None None None None
11457 11457 10209 None 9908 10.1093/jac/dkh508 Hershberger2005 Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin United States of America Observational 10607 10607 Use of fluoroquinolones (enrofloxacin) Farmers reported usual use of antibiotics through questionnaire (amount not specified) Enrofloxacin use No use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 3 None 72 None None None None None 3 134 None None None None None
11458 11458 10209 None 9908 10.1093/jac/dkh508 Hershberger2005 Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin United States of America Observational 10606 10606 Use of fluoroquinolones (enrofloxacin) Farmers reported usual use of antibiotics through questionnaire (amount not specified) Enrofloxacin use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 21 None 275 None None None None None 34 590 None None None None None
11459 11459 10209 None 9908 10.1093/jac/dkh508 Hershberger2005 Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin United States of America Observational 10605 10605 Use of fluoroquinolones (enrofloxacin) Farmers reported usual use of antibiotics through questionnaire (amount not specified) Enrofloxacin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 9 None 25 None None None None None 20 122 None None None None None
11460 11460 10209 None 9908 10.1093/jac/dkh508 Hershberger2005 Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin United States of America Observational 10602 10602 Use of aminoglycosides Farmers reported usual use of antibiotics through questionnaire (amount not specified) Use of aminoglycosides No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 55 None 10 None None None None None 158 112 None None None None None
11461 11461 10209 None 9908 10.1093/jac/dkh508 Hershberger2005 Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin United States of America Observational 10601 10601 Use of aminoglycosides Farmers reported usual use of antibiotics through questionnaire (amount not specified) Use of aminoglycosides No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 26 None 39 None None None None None 48 127 None None None None None
11462 11462 10209 None 9908 10.1093/jac/dkh508 Hershberger2005 Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin United States of America Observational 10600 10600 Use of aminoglycosides Farmers reported usual use of antibiotics through questionnaire (amount not specified) Use of aminoglycosides No use Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 8 None 7 None None None None None 29 18 None None None None None
11463 11463 10209 None 9908 10.1093/jac/dkh508 Hershberger2005 Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin United States of America Observational 10606 10606 Use of fluoroquinolones (enrofloxacin) Farmers reported usual use of antibiotics through questionnaire (amount not specified) Enrofloxacin use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 55 None 25 None None None None None 158 243 None None None None None
11464 11464 10209 None 9908 10.1093/jac/dkh508 Hershberger2005 Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin United States of America Observational 10604 10604 Use of fluoroquinolones (enrofloxacin) Farmers reported usual use of antibiotics through questionnaire (amount not specified) Enrofloxacin use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 26 None 37 None None None None None 48 175 None None None None None
11465 11465 10209 None 9908 10.1093/jac/dkh508 Hershberger2005 Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin United States of America Observational 10603 10603 Use of fluoroquinolones (enrofloxacin) Farmers reported usual use of antibiotics through questionnaire (amount not specified) Enrofloxacin use No use Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 8 None 30 None None None None None 29 47 None None None None None
11466 11466 10189 None 9332 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 Fraqueza2014 Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. Strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level Portugal Observational 10509 10509 Production system Extensive indoor vs intensive. Extensive indoor Intensive Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 74.80 None 72.90 None 100 100 None None None None None
11467 11467 10189 None 9332 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 Fraqueza2014 Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. Strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level Portugal Observational 10509 10509 Production system Extensive indoor vs intensive. Extensive indoor Intensive Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 56.70 None 2.70 None 100 100 None None None None None
11468 11468 10189 None 9332 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 Fraqueza2014 Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. Strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level Portugal Observational 10509 10509 Production system Extensive indoor vs intensive. Extensive indoor Intensive Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 77.40 None 96.40 None 100 100 None None None None None
11469 11469 10189 None 9332 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 Fraqueza2014 Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. Strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level Portugal Observational 10509 10509 Production system Extensive indoor vs intensive. Extensive indoor Intensive Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones norfloxacin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 74.00 None 95.90 None 100 100 None None None None None
11470 11470 10189 None 9332 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 Fraqueza2014 Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. Strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level Portugal Observational 10509 10509 Production system Extensive indoor vs intensive. Extensive indoor Intensive Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ofloxacin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 58.30 None 95.40 None 100 100 None None None None None
11471 11471 10189 None 9332 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 Fraqueza2014 Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. Strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level Portugal Observational 10509 10509 Production system Extensive indoor vs intensive. Extensive indoor Intensive Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 87.70 None 97.90 None 100 100 None None None None None
11472 11472 10189 None 9332 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 Fraqueza2014 Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. Strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level Portugal Observational 10509 10509 Production system Extensive indoor vs intensive. Extensive indoor Intensive Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 16.20 None 25.60 None 100 100 None None None None None
11473 11473 10189 None 9332 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 Fraqueza2014 Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. Strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level Portugal Observational 10509 10509 Production system Extensive indoor vs intensive. Extensive indoor Intensive Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 40.80 None 82.90 None 100 100 None None None None None
11474 11474 10189 None 9332 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 Fraqueza2014 Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. Strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level Portugal Observational 10509 10509 Production system Extensive indoor vs intensive. Extensive indoor Intensive Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 48.00 None 48.60 None 100 100 None None None None None
11475 11475 10189 None 9332 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 Fraqueza2014 Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. Strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level Portugal Observational 10509 10509 Production system Extensive indoor vs intensive. Extensive indoor Intensive Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 7.10 None 0.80 None 100 100 None None None None None
11476 11476 10189 None 9332 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 Fraqueza2014 Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. Strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level Portugal Observational 10509 10509 Production system Extensive indoor vs intensive. Extensive indoor Intensive Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 44.20 None 0.80 None 100 100 None None None None None
11477 11477 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10560 10560 Flock size 2001-4000 hens vs 2000 and less 2001-4000 hens 2000 and less Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.90 0.33 2.44 0.831 None
11478 11478 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10559 10559 Flock size >4001 hens vs 2000 and less >4001 hens 2000 and less Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.32 0.07 1.39 0.129 None
11482 11482 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10560 10560 Flock size 2001-4000 hens vs 2000 and less 2001-4000 hens 2000 and less Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.24 0.08 0.72 0.011 None
11483 11483 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10559 10559 Flock size >4001 hens vs 2000 and less >4001 hens 2000 and less Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.23 0.06 0.90 0.035 None
11484 11484 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10560 10560 Flock size 2001-4000 hens vs 2000 and less 2001-4000 hens 2000 and less Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.35 0.10 1.23 0.103 None
11485 11485 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10559 10559 Flock size >4001 hens vs 2000 and less >4001 hens 2000 and less Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.84 0.29 2.43 0.75 None
11486 11486 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10560 10560 Flock size 2001-4000 hens vs 2000 and less 2001-4000 hens 2000 and less Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.67 0.39 7.28 0.492 None
11487 11487 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10559 10559 Flock size >4001 hens vs 2000 and less >4001 hens 2000 and less Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.77 0.13 4.62 0.773 None
11488 11488 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10560 10560 Flock size 2001-4000 hens vs 2000 and less 2001-4000 hens 2000 and less Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.70 0.16 3.20 0.65 None
11489 11489 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10559 10559 Flock size >4001 hens vs 2000 and less >4001 hens 2000 and less Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.17 0.19 7.04 0.868 None
11490 11490 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10560 10560 Flock size 2001-4000 hens vs 2000 and less 2001-4000 hens 2000 and less Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tigecycline None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.82 0.21 3.13 0.771 None
11491 11491 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10559 10559 Flock size >4001 hens vs 2000 and less >4001 hens 2000 and less Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tigecycline None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.35 0.27 6.68 0.715 None
11492 11492 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10562 10562 Housing type Indoor vs outdoor scratching area Indoor Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.87 0.25 3.04 0.831 None
11493 11493 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10561 10561 Housing type Free-range vs outdoor scratching area Free-range Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.20 0.05 0.76 0.019 None
11494 11494 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10563 10563 Housing type Organic vs outdoor scratching area Organic Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.69 0.17 2.82 0.606 None
11495 11495 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10562 10562 Housing type Indoor vs outdoor scratching area Indoor Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.43 0.13 1.38 0.156 None
11496 11496 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10561 10561 Housing type Free-range vs outdoor scratching area Free-range Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.62 0.25 1.54 0.303 None
11497 11497 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10563 10563 Housing type Organic vs outdoor scratching area Organic Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.30 0.08 1.19 0.087 None
11498 11498 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10562 10562 Housing type Indoor vs outdoor scratching area Indoor Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.65 0.12 3.42 0.611 None
11499 11499 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10561 10561 Housing type Free-range vs outdoor scratching area Free-range Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.12 0.42 2.96 0.826 None
11500 11500 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10563 10563 Housing type Organic vs outdoor scratching area Organic Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.60 0.15 2.44 0.479 None
11501 11501 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10562 10562 Housing type Indoor vs outdoor scratching area Indoor Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.54 0.12 2.34 0.407 None
11502 11502 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10561 10561 Housing type Free-range vs outdoor scratching area Free-range Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.82 0.82 9.67 0.098 None
11503 11503 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10563 10563 Housing type Organic vs outdoor scratching area Organic Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.32 0.36 14.78 0.374 None
11504 11504 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10562 10562 Housing type Indoor vs outdoor scratching area Indoor Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.49 0.10 2.30 0.364 None
11505 11505 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10561 10561 Housing type Free-range vs outdoor scratching area Free-range Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.52 0.16 1.68 0.274 None
11506 11506 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10563 10563 Housing type Organic vs outdoor scratching area Organic Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.55 0.08 3.77 0.545 None
11510 11510 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10550 10550 Disinfection of stable By farmer vs specialist involved By farmer Specialist involved Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.22 0.08 0.58 0.002 None
11511 11511 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10551 10551 Disinfection of stable None vs specialist involved None Specialist involved Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.20 0.05 0.89 0.035 None
11513 11513 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10551 10551 Disinfection of stable None vs specialist involved None Specialist involved Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.20 0.05 0.89 0.035 None
11515 11515 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10552 10552 Egg boxes Reused vs new Reused egg boxes New egg boxes Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.42 1.11 17.54 0.035 None
11516 11516 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10553 10553 Employees 3 people and less 3 people and less 4 people and more Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.37 1.01 5.57 0.047 None
11517 11517 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10564 10564 Other poultry production Yes vs no Other poultry production None Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.17 0.04 0.64 0.009 None
11518 11518 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10567 10567 Sheep Yes vs no Sheep present None Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.24 0.10 0.58 0.002 None
11519 11519 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10552 10552 Egg boxes Reused vs new Reused egg boxes New egg boxes Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.91 1.05 14.55 0.043 None
11520 11520 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10553 10553 Employees 3 people and less 3 people and less 4 people and more Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.72 1.42 9.75 0.008 None
11522 11522 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10566 10566 Pigs Yes vs no Pigs present None Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.20 0.05 0.71 0.013 None
11523 11523 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10558 10558 Feed additives Yes vs no Feed additives used None Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.03 0.00 0.23 0.001 None
11524 11524 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10568 10568 Wash basin Yes vs no - near entrance Wash basin present None Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tigecycline None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.14 0.03 0.72 0.018 None
11526 11526 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10560 10560 Flock size 2001-4000 hens vs 2000 and less 2001-4000 hens 2000 and less Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.69 0.28 1.67 0.409 None
11527 11527 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10559 10559 Flock size >4001 hens vs 2000 and less >4001 hens 2000 and less Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.98 0.42 2.28 0.958 None
11532 11532 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10562 10562 Housing type Indoor vs outdoor scratching area Indoor Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.63 0.25 1.61 0.334 None
11533 11533 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10561 10561 Housing type Free-range vs outdoor scratching area Free-range Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.61 0.29 1.27 0.183 None
11534 11534 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10563 10563 Housing type Organic vs outdoor scratching area Organic Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.26 0.05 1.44 0.124 None
11535 11535 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10549 10549 Cats Presence of cats on farm vs none Cats present on farm None Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.44 0.20 0.94 0.033 None
11538 11538 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10556 10556 Farmer changing clothes Shoes vs none Farmer changing shoes None Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.82 0.25 2.65 0.735 None
11539 11539 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10555 10555 Farmer changing clothes Shoes and overall vs none Farmer changing shoes & overalls None Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 7.18 0.70 73.69 0.097 None
11540 11540 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10554 10554 Farmer changing clothes Overalls vs none Farmer changing overalls None Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.74 1.54 4.91 0.001 None
11541 11541 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10569 10569 Water supply Private vs public Private water supply Public water supply Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.77 1.13 12.63 0.031 None
11542 11542 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10560 10560 Flock size 2001-4000 hens vs 2000 and less 2001-4000 hens 2000 and less Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.47 1.39 8.64 0.008 None
11543 11543 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10559 10559 Flock size >4001 hens vs 2000 and less >4001 hens 2000 and less Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.84 0.88 9.11 0.08 None
11544 11544 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10562 10562 Housing type Indoor vs outdoor scratching area Indoor Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.54 1.17 5.54 0.019 None
11545 11545 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10561 10561 Housing type Free-range vs outdoor scratching area Free-range Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.72 0.69 4.26 0.243 None
11546 11546 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10563 10563 Housing type Organic vs outdoor scratching area Organic Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 5.84 1.21 28.17 0.028 None
11547 11547 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10549 10549 Cats Presence of cats on farm vs none Cats present on farm None Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 11.30 1.68 76.00 0.013 None
11548 11548 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10560 10560 Flock size 2001-4000 hens vs 2000 and less 2001-4000 hens 2000 and less Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.47 0.12 1.85 0.281 None
11549 11549 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10559 10559 Flock size >4001 hens vs 2000 and less >4001 hens 2000 and less Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.64 0.17 2.45 0.516 None
11550 11550 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10562 10562 Housing type Indoor vs outdoor scratching area Indoor Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.35 1.16 16.36 0.03 None
11552 11552 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10561 10561 Housing type Free-range vs outdoor scratching area Free-range Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.50 0.44 5.08 0.517 None
11553 11553 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10563 10563 Housing type Organic vs outdoor scratching area Organic Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.56 0.10 3.26 0.522 None
11554 11554 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10560 10560 Flock size 2001-4000 hens vs 2000 and less 2001-4000 hens 2000 and less Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.55 0.42 5.79 0.514 None
11555 11555 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10559 10559 Flock size >4001 hens vs 2000 and less >4001 hens 2000 and less Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.70 0.58 4.95 0.332 None
11556 11556 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10562 10562 Housing type Indoor vs outdoor scratching area Indoor Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.66 0.49 5.65 0.42 None
11557 11557 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10561 10561 Housing type Free-range vs outdoor scratching area Free-range Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.93 0.64 5.85 0.245 None
11558 11558 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10563 10563 Housing type Organic vs outdoor scratching area Organic Outdoor scratching area Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 12.21 2.32 64.25 0.003 None
11559 11559 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10570 10570 Weeks on farm Chickens on farm for > 52 weeks or 52 and fewer weeks Chickens on farm for > 52 weeks Chickens on farm for 52 weeks and less Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.24 1.18 8.85 0.022 None
11560 11560 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10548 10548 Anthelmintics use Use vs no use. No further specification Anthelmintics use None Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.29 1.16 9.32 0.025 None
11562 11562 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10557 10557 Feed additives Use vs no use. No further specification Feed additives None Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 5.11 1.86 14.05 0.002 None
11563 11563 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10565 10565 Pigs Presence of pigs Presence of pigs None Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.48 1.08 5.70 0.032 None
11566 11566 10205 None 9808 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01376.x Harisberger2011 Antimicrobial Resistance in Swiss Laying Hens, Prevalence and Risk Factors Switzerland Observational 10568 10568 Wash basin Yes vs no - near entrance Wash basin present None Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.28 0.13 0.62 0.002 None
11568 11568 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10064 10064 Carcasses tested Whole vs parts of broiler chicken tested from supermarkets Whole broiler chicken Parts broiler chicken Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. False None False 8 None 31 None None None None None 8 32 None None None None None
11569 11569 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10064 10064 Carcasses tested Whole vs parts of broiler chicken tested from supermarkets Whole broiler chicken Parts broiler chicken Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines doxycycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 8 None 32 None None None None None 8 32 None None None None None
11570 11570 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10064 10064 Carcasses tested Whole vs parts of broiler chicken tested from supermarkets Whole broiler chicken Parts broiler chicken Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 8 None 28 None None None None None 8 32 None None None None None
11571 11571 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10064 10064 Carcasses tested Whole vs parts of broiler chicken tested from supermarkets Whole broiler chicken Parts broiler chicken Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 8 None 18 None None None None None 8 32 None None None None None
11572 11572 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10064 10064 Carcasses tested Whole vs parts of broiler chicken tested from supermarkets Whole broiler chicken Parts broiler chicken Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 8 None 18 None None None None None 8 32 None None None None None
11573 11573 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10064 10064 Carcasses tested Whole vs parts of broiler chicken tested from supermarkets Whole broiler chicken Parts broiler chicken Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False 8 None 18 None None None None None 8 32 None None None None None
11574 11574 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10064 10064 Carcasses tested Whole vs parts of broiler chicken tested from supermarkets Whole broiler chicken Parts broiler chicken Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 3 None None None None None 8 32 None None None None None
11575 11575 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10064 10064 Carcasses tested Whole vs parts of broiler chicken tested from supermarkets Whole broiler chicken Parts broiler chicken Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 8 32 None None None None None
11576 11576 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10064 10064 Carcasses tested Whole vs parts of broiler chicken tested from supermarkets Whole broiler chicken Parts broiler chicken Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 8 32 None None None None None
11577 11577 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10064 10064 Carcasses tested Whole vs parts of broiler chicken tested from supermarkets Whole broiler chicken Parts broiler chicken Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 8 32 None None None None None
11578 11578 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10064 10064 Carcasses tested Whole vs parts of broiler chicken tested from supermarkets Whole broiler chicken Parts broiler chicken Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 8 32 None None None None None
11579 11579 10023 None 10668 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-223 Khan2018 Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates recovered from chickens sold at retail outlets in Trinidad Trinidad and Tobago Observational 10064 10064 Carcasses tested Whole vs parts of broiler chicken tested from supermarkets Whole broiler chicken Parts broiler chicken Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 8 32 None None None None None
11580 11580 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10107 10107 Aminoglycoside use None Aminoglycoside use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides dihydrostreptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 99 None None None None None 20 230 None None None None None
11582 11582 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10107 10107 Aminoglycoside use None Aminoglycoside use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 30 None None None None None 20 230 None None None None None
11583 11583 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10109 10109 Beta-lactam use None Beta-lactam use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides dihydrostreptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 17 None 95 None None None None None 26 224 None None None None None
11584 11584 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10109 10109 Beta-lactam use None Beta-lactam use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 51 None None None None None 26 224 None None None None None
11585 11585 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10116 10116 Macrolide use None Macrolide use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides dihydrostreptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 22 None 90 None None None None None 38 212 None None None None None
11586 11586 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10116 10116 Macrolide use None Macrolide use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 47 None None None None None 38 212 None None None None None
11587 11587 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10116 10116 Macrolide use None Macrolide use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 29 None 127 None None None None None 38 212 None None None None None
11588 11588 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10113 10113 Fluoroquinolone use None Fluoroquinolone use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides dihydrostreptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 107 None None None None None 5 245 None None None None None
11589 11589 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10113 10113 Fluoroquinolone use None Fluoroquinolone use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 34 None None None None None 5 245 None None None None None
11590 11590 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10113 10113 Fluoroquinolone use None Fluoroquinolone use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 151 None None None None None 5 245 None None None None None
11591 11591 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10113 10113 Fluoroquinolone use None Fluoroquinolone use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 69 None None None None None 5 245 None None None None None
11592 11592 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10113 10113 Fluoroquinolone use None Fluoroquinolone use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 12 None None None None None 5 245 None None None None None
11593 11593 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10113 10113 Fluoroquinolone use None Fluoroquinolone use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 3 None None None None None 5 245 None None None None None
11594 11594 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10111 10111 Feed additive use Other than polypeptides, macrolides, aminoglycosides, and synthetic antimicrobials Feed additive use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides dihydrostreptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 96 None None None None None 52 198 None None None None None
11595 11595 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10110 10110 Colistin use None Colistin use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 32 None None None None None 6 244 None None None None None
11596 11596 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10110 10110 Colistin use None Colistin use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 72 None None None None None 6 244 None None None None None
11597 11597 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10121 10121 Synthetic feed additives None Colistin use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 54 None None None None None 54 196 None None None None None
11598 11598 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10118 10118 Phenicol use None Phenicol use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 147 None None None None None 10 240 None None None None None
11599 11599 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10118 10118 Phenicol use None Phenicol use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 46 None None None None None 10 240 None None None None None
11600 11600 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10118 10118 Phenicol use None Phenicol use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 67 None None None None None 10 240 None None None None None
11601 11601 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10119 10119 Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim use None Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 19 None 137 None None None None None 24 226 None None None None None
11602 11602 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10119 10119 Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim use None Sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 11 None None None None None 24 226 None None None None None
11604 11604 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10123 10123 Tetracycline use None Tetracycline use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 37 None 119 None None None None None 45 205 None None None None None
11605 11605 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10123 10123 Tetracycline use None Tetracycline use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 36 None None None None None 45 205 None None None None None
11606 11606 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10123 10123 Tetracycline use None Tetracycline use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 18 None 54 None None None None None 45 205 None None None None None
11633 11633 10090 None 12740 10.1371/journal.pone.0139706 Rasmussen2015 Beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolates in imported and locally produced chicken meat from Ghana Ghana Observational 10248 10248 Production Origin Locally raised (Ghana) vs imported Imported Local Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 57.50 None 88.90 None 36 73 None None None None None
11634 11634 10090 None 12740 10.1371/journal.pone.0139706 Rasmussen2015 Beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolates in imported and locally produced chicken meat from Ghana Ghana Observational 10248 10248 Production Origin Locally raised (Ghana) vs imported Imported Local Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 57.50 None 88.90 None 36 73 None None None None None
11635 11635 10090 None 12740 10.1371/journal.pone.0139706 Rasmussen2015 Beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolates in imported and locally produced chicken meat from Ghana Ghana Observational 10248 10248 Production Origin Locally raised (Ghana) vs imported Imported Local Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 46.60 None 75.00 None 36 73 None None None None None
11636 11636 10090 None 12740 10.1371/journal.pone.0139706 Rasmussen2015 Beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolates in imported and locally produced chicken meat from Ghana Ghana Observational 10248 10248 Production Origin Locally raised (Ghana) vs imported Imported Local Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 46.60 None 75.00 None 36 73 None None None None None
11637 11637 10090 None 12740 10.1371/journal.pone.0139706 Rasmussen2015 Beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolates in imported and locally produced chicken meat from Ghana Ghana Observational 10248 10248 Production Origin Locally raised (Ghana) vs imported Imported Local Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 38.40 None 66.70 None 36 73 None None None None None
11638 11638 10090 None 12740 10.1371/journal.pone.0139706 Rasmussen2015 Beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolates in imported and locally produced chicken meat from Ghana Ghana Observational 10248 10248 Production Origin Locally raised (Ghana) vs imported Imported Local Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 61.60 None 69.40 None 36 73 None None None None None
11639 11639 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10416 10416 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 19 None 21 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11640 11640 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10416 10416 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 14 None 17 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11641 11641 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10416 10416 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 7 None 12 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11642 11642 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10416 10416 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 15 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11643 11643 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10416 10416 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 6 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11644 11644 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10416 10416 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 23 None 20 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11645 11645 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10416 10416 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11646 11646 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10416 10416 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones sarafloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 1 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11647 11647 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10416 10416 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides, plain and in combinations sulfadimethoxine None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 14 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11648 11648 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10416 10416 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfathiazole None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 14 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11649 11649 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10416 10416 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 1 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11650 11650 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10416 10416 Bambermycin use 2 mg bambermycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bambermycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 8 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11651 11651 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10419 10419 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 20 None 21 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11652 11652 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10419 10419 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 14 None 17 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11653 11653 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10419 10419 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 10 None 12 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11654 11654 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10419 10419 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 15 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11655 11655 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10419 10419 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 8 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11656 11656 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10419 10419 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 20 None 23 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11657 11657 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10419 10419 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 0 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11658 11658 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10419 10419 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones sarafloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 2 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11659 11659 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10419 10419 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides, plain and in combinations sulfadimethoxine None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 14 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11660 11660 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10419 10419 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfathiazole None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 14 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11661 11661 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10419 10419 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11662 11662 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10419 10419 Penicillin use 2.2 mg procaine penicillin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Penicillin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 8 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11663 11663 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10423 10423 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 24 None 21 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11664 11664 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10423 10423 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 23 None 17 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11665 11665 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10423 10423 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 12 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11666 11666 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10423 10423 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 19 None 15 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11667 11667 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10423 10423 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 8 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11668 11668 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10423 10423 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 25 None 23 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11669 11669 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10423 10423 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11670 11670 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10423 10423 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones sarafloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 2 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11671 11671 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10423 10423 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides, plain and in combinations sulfadimethoxine None Escherichia coli False None False 18 None 14 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11672 11672 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10423 10423 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfathiazole None Escherichia coli False None False 18 None 14 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11673 11673 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10423 10423 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 1 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11674 11674 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10423 10423 Salinomycin use 60 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 8 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11675 11675 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10413 10413 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 20 None 21 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11676 11676 10212 None 9927 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.003 Hille2017 Cefotaxime-resistant E. coli in dairy and beef cattle farms--Joint analyses of two cross-sectional investigations in Germany Germany Observational 10620 10620 Number of stable buildings for beef cattle Samples were taken on farms keeping beef cattle from 2011-2012 in Germany >1 Stable buildings for beef cattle - yes Not >1 stable buildings for beef cattle Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 49.00 None 28.00 None 19 41 None None None None None
11677 11677 10212 None 9927 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.003 Hille2017 Cefotaxime-resistant E. coli in dairy and beef cattle farms--Joint analyses of two cross-sectional investigations in Germany Germany Observational 10621 10621 Percentage of Fleckvieh Samples were taken on farms keeping beef cattle from 2011-2012 in Germany Percentage of Fleckvieh >50% - yes Percentage of Fleckvieh NOT >50% Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 29.00 None 43.00 None 37 23 None None None None None
11678 11678 10212 None 9927 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.003 Hille2017 Cefotaxime-resistant E. coli in dairy and beef cattle farms--Joint analyses of two cross-sectional investigations in Germany Germany Observational 10613 10613 Duration of fattening Samples were taken on farms keeping beef cattle from 2011-2012 in Germany Duration of fattening > 18 months - yes Duration of fattening NOT >18 months Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 26.00 None 44.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
11679 11679 10212 None 9927 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.003 Hille2017 Cefotaxime-resistant E. coli in dairy and beef cattle farms--Joint analyses of two cross-sectional investigations in Germany Germany Observational 10615 10615 Farm management using specific software Samples were taken on farms keeping beef cattle from 2011-2012 in Germany Farm management using specific software - yes Farm management NOT using specific software Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 30.00 None 41.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
11680 11680 10212 None 9927 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.003 Hille2017 Cefotaxime-resistant E. coli in dairy and beef cattle farms--Joint analyses of two cross-sectional investigations in Germany Germany Observational 10616 10616 Feed: Hay Samples were taken on farms keeping beef cattle from 2011-2012 in Germany Hay feed - yes Not hay feed Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 29.00 None 43.00 None 32 28 None None None None None
11681 11681 10212 None 9927 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.003 Hille2017 Cefotaxime-resistant E. coli in dairy and beef cattle farms--Joint analyses of two cross-sectional investigations in Germany Germany Observational 10614 10614 Exclusive use of nipple drinkers Samples were taken on farms keeping beef cattle from 2011-2012 in Germany Exclusive use of nipple drinkers - yes No exclusive use of nipple drinkers Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 51.00 None 32.00 None 8 52 None None None None None
11682 11682 10212 None 9927 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.003 Hille2017 Cefotaxime-resistant E. coli in dairy and beef cattle farms--Joint analyses of two cross-sectional investigations in Germany Germany Observational 10622 10622 Presence of sick pens Samples were taken on farms keeping beef cattle from 2011-2012 in Germany Presence of sick pens - yes No presence of sick pens Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 49.00 None 27.00 None 19 41 None None None None None
11683 11683 10212 None 9927 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.003 Hille2017 Cefotaxime-resistant E. coli in dairy and beef cattle farms--Joint analyses of two cross-sectional investigations in Germany Germany Observational 10611 10611 Cleaning of stables exclusively with pitchfork Samples were taken on farms keeping beef cattle from 2011-2012 in Germany Cleaning of stables exclusively with pitchfork - yes Cleaning of stables not exclusively with pitchfork Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 28.00 None 40.00 None 24 36 None None None None None
11684 11684 10212 None 9927 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.003 Hille2017 Cefotaxime-resistant E. coli in dairy and beef cattle farms--Joint analyses of two cross-sectional investigations in Germany Germany Observational 10623 10623 Storage of manure inside Samples were taken on farms keeping beef cattle from 2011-2012 in Germany Storage of manure inside - yes No storage of manure inside Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 48.00 None 30.00 None 14 46 None None None None None
11685 11685 10212 None 9927 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.003 Hille2017 Cefotaxime-resistant E. coli in dairy and beef cattle farms--Joint analyses of two cross-sectional investigations in Germany Germany Observational 10624 10624 Use of boots for one stable only Samples were taken on farms keeping beef cattle from 2011-2012 in Germany Use of boots for one stable only - yes No use of boots for one stable only Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 50.00 None 33.00 None 7 53 None None None None None
11686 11686 10212 None 9927 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.003 Hille2017 Cefotaxime-resistant E. coli in dairy and beef cattle farms--Joint analyses of two cross-sectional investigations in Germany Germany Observational 10612 10612 Control of flies with traps Samples were taken on farms keeping beef cattle from 2011-2012 in Germany Control of flies with traps - yes No control of flies with traps Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 26.00 None 38.00 None 13 47 None None None None None
11687 11687 10212 None 9927 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.003 Hille2017 Cefotaxime-resistant E. coli in dairy and beef cattle farms--Joint analyses of two cross-sectional investigations in Germany Germany Observational 10610 10610 Antimicrobial treatment of all animals in the sampled animal group Samples were taken on farms keeping beef cattle from 2011-2012 in Germany Antimicrobial treatment of all animals in the sampled group - yes No treatment of all animals Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pooled Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 71.00 None 32.00 None 7 86 None None None None None
11689 11689 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10413 10413 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 17 None 17 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11690 11690 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10413 10413 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 12 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11691 11691 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10413 10413 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 15 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11692 11692 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10413 10413 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 8 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11693 11693 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10413 10413 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 24 None 23 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11694 11694 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10413 10413 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11695 11695 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10413 10413 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones sarafloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 2 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11696 11696 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10413 10413 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides, plain and in combinations sulfadimethoxine None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 14 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11697 11697 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10413 10413 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfathiazole None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 14 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11698 11698 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10413 10413 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11699 11699 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10413 10413 Bacitracin use 4.4 mg bacitracin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 8 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11700 11700 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10411 10411 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 17 None 21 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
11701 11701 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10411 10411 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 17 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
11702 11702 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10411 10411 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 12 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
11703 11703 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10411 10411 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 15 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
11704 11704 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10411 10411 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 8 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
11705 11705 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10411 10411 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 23 None 23 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
11706 11706 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10411 10411 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
11707 11707 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10411 10411 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones sarafloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 2 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
11708 11708 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10411 10411 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides, plain and in combinations sulfadimethoxine None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 14 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
11709 11709 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10411 10411 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfathiazole None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 14 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
11710 11710 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10411 10411 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
11711 11711 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10411 10411 Bacitracin and Salinomycin use 3.3 mg bacitracin + 1.1 mg salinomycin per kg of feed vs no antibiotics. Bacitracin and Salinomycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 10 None 8 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
11712 11712 10189 None 9332 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 Fraqueza2014 Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. Strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level Portugal Observational 10510 10510 Production system Organic vs intensive. Extensive indoor Intensive Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 77.80 None 72.90 None 100 100 None None None None None
11713 11713 10189 None 9332 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 Fraqueza2014 Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. Strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level Portugal Observational 10510 10510 Production system Organic vs intensive. Extensive indoor Intensive Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 43.00 None 2.70 None 100 100 None None None None None
11714 11714 10189 None 9332 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 Fraqueza2014 Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. Strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level Portugal Observational 10510 10510 Production system Organic vs intensive. Extensive indoor Intensive Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 96.50 None 96.40 None 100 100 None None None None None
11715 11715 10189 None 9332 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 Fraqueza2014 Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. Strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level Portugal Observational 10510 10510 Production system Organic vs intensive. Extensive indoor Intensive Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones norfloxacin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 91.30 None 95.90 None 100 100 None None None None None
11716 11716 10189 None 9332 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 Fraqueza2014 Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. Strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level Portugal Observational 10510 10510 Production system Organic vs intensive. Extensive indoor Intensive Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ofloxacin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 90.50 None 95.40 None 100 100 None None None None None
11717 11717 10189 None 9332 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 Fraqueza2014 Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. Strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level Portugal Observational 10510 10510 Production system Organic vs intensive. Extensive indoor Intensive Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 97.30 None 97.90 None 100 100 None None None None None
11718 11718 10189 None 9332 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 Fraqueza2014 Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. Strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level Portugal Observational 10510 10510 Production system Organic vs intensive. Extensive indoor Intensive Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 26.80 None 25.60 None 100 100 None None None None None
11719 11719 10212 None 9927 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.003 Hille2017 Cefotaxime-resistant E. coli in dairy and beef cattle farms--Joint analyses of two cross-sectional investigations in Germany Germany Observational 10618 10618 Feed: Own grain Samples were taken on farms keeping dairy cattle from 2011-2012 in Germany Feed: Own grain - yes Feed not own grain Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 37.00 None 63.00 None 34 18 None None None None None
11720 11720 10212 None 9927 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.003 Hille2017 Cefotaxime-resistant E. coli in dairy and beef cattle farms--Joint analyses of two cross-sectional investigations in Germany Germany Observational 10617 10617 Feed: Hay Samples were taken on farms keeping dairy cattle from 2011-2012 in Germany Feed: hay - yes Feed not hay Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 53.00 None 38.00 None 39 13 None None None None None
11721 11721 10189 None 9332 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 Fraqueza2014 Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. Strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level Portugal Observational 10510 10510 Production system Organic vs intensive. Extensive indoor Intensive Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 73.60 None 82.90 None 100 100 None None None None None
11722 11722 10212 None 9927 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.05.003 Hille2017 Cefotaxime-resistant E. coli in dairy and beef cattle farms--Joint analyses of two cross-sectional investigations in Germany Germany Observational 10619 10619 Forest within a radius of 1km Samples were taken on farms keeping dairy cattle from 2011-2012 in Germany Forest within a radius of 1km - yes Forest not within a radius of 1km Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 42.00 None 70.00 None 40 12 None None None None None
11723 11723 10189 None 9332 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 Fraqueza2014 Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. Strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level Portugal Observational 10510 10510 Production system Organic vs intensive. Extensive indoor Intensive Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 26.40 None 48.60 None 100 100 None None None None None
11724 11724 10189 None 9332 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 Fraqueza2014 Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. Strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level Portugal Observational 10510 10510 Production system Organic vs intensive. Extensive indoor Intensive Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 47.00 None 0.80 None 100 100 None None None None None
11725 11725 10189 None 9332 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 Fraqueza2014 Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. Strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level Portugal Observational 10510 10510 Production system Organic vs intensive. Extensive indoor Intensive Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 13.20 None 0.80 None 100 100 None None None None None
11726 11726 10010 None 10474 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.04.027 Juntunen2010 Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli selected by tylosin treatment at a pig farm Finland Observational 10035 10035 Tylosin use Tylosin was administered in feed (body weight dose of 3–6 mg/kg/day) to treat proliferative enteropathy. Measurement of treated pigs was 3-5 weeks after withdrawl of tylosin. Tylosin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 15 57 None None None None None
11727 11727 10010 None 10474 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.04.027 Juntunen2010 Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli selected by tylosin treatment at a pig farm Finland Observational 10035 10035 Tylosin use Tylosin was administered in feed (body weight dose of 3–6 mg/kg/day) to treat proliferative enteropathy. Measurement of treated pigs was 3-5 weeks after withdrawl of tylosin. Tylosin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 3 None 2 None None None None None 15 57 None None None None None
11728 11728 10010 None 10474 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.04.027 Juntunen2010 Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli selected by tylosin treatment at a pig farm Finland Observational 10035 10035 Tylosin use Tylosin was administered in feed (body weight dose of 3–6 mg/kg/day) to treat proliferative enteropathy. Measurement of treated pigs was 3-5 weeks after withdrawl of tylosin. Tylosin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 4 None 0 None None None None None 15 57 None None None None None
11729 11729 10010 None 10474 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.04.027 Juntunen2010 Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli selected by tylosin treatment at a pig farm Finland Observational 10035 10035 Tylosin use Tylosin was administered in feed (body weight dose of 3–6 mg/kg/day) to treat proliferative enteropathy. Measurement of treated pigs was 3-5 weeks after withdrawl of tylosin. Tylosin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 15 57 None None None None None
11730 11730 10010 None 10474 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.04.027 Juntunen2010 Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli selected by tylosin treatment at a pig farm Finland Observational 10035 10035 Tylosin use Tylosin was administered in feed (body weight dose of 3–6 mg/kg/day) to treat proliferative enteropathy. Measurement of treated pigs was 3-5 weeks after withdrawl of tylosin. Tylosin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter coli False None False 3 None 2 None None None None None 15 57 None None None None None
11731 11731 10010 None 10474 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.04.027 Juntunen2010 Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli selected by tylosin treatment at a pig farm Finland Observational 10035 10035 Tylosin use Tylosin was administered in feed (body weight dose of 3–6 mg/kg/day) to treat proliferative enteropathy. Measurement of treated pigs was 3-5 weeks after withdrawl of tylosin. Tylosin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 15 57 None None None None None
11732 11732 10010 None 10474 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.04.027 Juntunen2010 Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli selected by tylosin treatment at a pig farm Finland Observational 10035 10035 Tylosin use Tylosin was administered in feed (body weight dose of 3–6 mg/kg/day) to treat proliferative enteropathy. Measurement of treated pigs was 3-5 weeks after withdrawl of tylosin. Tylosin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 15 57 None None None None None
11734 11734 10012 None 10476 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.02.008 Juntunen2011 Longitudinal on-farm study of the development of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from pigs before and after danofloxacin and tylosin treatments Finland Observational 10037 10037 Intramuscular Danofloxacin treatment Pigs with diarrhoea treated with intramuscular danofloxacin (25mg/mL injection) for three days (1 mL daily). All pigs were routinely administered tylosin twice daily in feed (100mg/kg) Danofloxacin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 9 None 12 None None None None None 12 15 None None None None None
11735 11735 10012 None 10476 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.02.008 Juntunen2011 Longitudinal on-farm study of the development of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from pigs before and after danofloxacin and tylosin treatments Finland Observational 10037 10037 Intramuscular Danofloxacin treatment Pigs with diarrhoea treated with intramuscular danofloxacin (25mg/mL injection) for three days (1 mL daily). All pigs were routinely administered tylosin twice daily in feed (100mg/kg) Danofloxacin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 10 None 13 None None None None None 12 15 None None None None None
11736 11736 10009 None 10472 10.1089/fpd.2012.1176 Juntunen2012 Campylobacter coli isolates from finnish farrowing farms using aminopenicillins: High prevalence of blaOXA-61 and β-Lactamase production, but low MIC values Finland Observational 10034 10034 Aminopenicillin use Therapeutic usage of aminopenicillins for the treatment of diarrhea or MMA syndrome at 15mg/kg intramuscularly for 3–5 days (isolates taken 9–22 days after treatment). Aminopenicillin defined as either ampicillin (150 mg/L) or amoxicillin (150 mg/L). Aminopenicillin use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 4 None None None None None 22 63 None None None None None
11737 11737 10009 None 10472 10.1089/fpd.2012.1176 Juntunen2012 Campylobacter coli isolates from finnish farrowing farms using aminopenicillins: High prevalence of blaOXA-61 and β-Lactamase production, but low MIC values Finland Observational 10034 10034 Aminopenicillin use Therapeutic usage of aminopenicillins for the treatment of diarrhea or MMA syndrome at 15mg/kg intramuscularly for 3–5 days (isolates taken 9–22 days after treatment). Aminopenicillin defined as either ampicillin (150 mg/L) or amoxicillin (150 mg/L). Aminopenicillin use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 3 None 3 None None None None None 22 63 None None None None None
11738 11738 10009 None 10472 10.1089/fpd.2012.1176 Juntunen2012 Campylobacter coli isolates from finnish farrowing farms using aminopenicillins: High prevalence of blaOXA-61 and β-Lactamase production, but low MIC values Finland Observational 10034 10034 Aminopenicillin use Therapeutic usage of aminopenicillins for the treatment of diarrhea or MMA syndrome at 15mg/kg intramuscularly for 3–5 days (isolates taken 9–22 days after treatment). Aminopenicillin defined as either ampicillin (150 mg/L) or amoxicillin (150 mg/L). Aminopenicillin use No use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 22 63 None None None None None
11739 11739 10011 None 10475 10.1111/jam.12120 Juntunen2013 Absence of tetracycline resistance in Campylobacter coli isolates from Finnish finishing pigs treated with chlortetracycline Finland Observational 10036 10036 Chlortetracycline Treatment Prescribed oral chlortetracycline mixed in feed (35 mg of chlortetracycline per kg of body weight) for a 10-day period for finishing pigs suffering from respiratory tract infections. Isolates taken after tx. Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 36 27 None None None None None
11740 11740 10011 None 10475 10.1111/jam.12120 Juntunen2013 Absence of tetracycline resistance in Campylobacter coli isolates from Finnish finishing pigs treated with chlortetracycline Finland Observational 10036 10036 Chlortetracycline Treatment Prescribed oral chlortetracycline mixed in feed (35 mg of chlortetracycline per kg of body weight) for a 10-day period for finishing pigs suffering from respiratory tract infections. Isolates taken after tx. Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 8 None 3 None None None None None 36 27 None None None None None
11741 11741 10011 None 10475 10.1111/jam.12120 Juntunen2013 Absence of tetracycline resistance in Campylobacter coli isolates from Finnish finishing pigs treated with chlortetracycline Finland Observational 10036 10036 Chlortetracycline Treatment Prescribed oral chlortetracycline mixed in feed (35 mg of chlortetracycline per kg of body weight) for a 10-day period for finishing pigs suffering from respiratory tract infections. Isolates taken after tx. Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 36 27 None None None None None
11742 11742 10015 None 10585 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.022 Kaspersen2018 Occurrence of quinolone resistant E. coli originating from different animal species in Norway Norway Observational 10053 10053 Medium Population Density Effect of medium human population density (five–200 inhabitants per km2) compared to low human population density (< five inhabitants per km2) Medium Population Density Low Population Density Cattle Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials quinolones, combinations with other antibacterials None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.40 None 1.20 None 268 82 None None None None None
11743 11743 10015 None 10585 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.022 Kaspersen2018 Occurrence of quinolone resistant E. coli originating from different animal species in Norway Norway Observational 10048 10048 High Population Density Effect of high human population density (> 200 inhabitants per km2) compared to low human population density (< five inhabitants per km2) High Population Density Low Population Density Cattle Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials quinolones, combinations with other antibacterials None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 1.20 None 121 82 None None None None None
11744 11744 10015 None 10585 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.022 Kaspersen2018 Occurrence of quinolone resistant E. coli originating from different animal species in Norway Norway Observational 10049 10049 Medium Population Density Effect of medium human population density (five–200 inhabitants per km2) compared to low human population density (< five inhabitants per km2) Medium Population Density Low Population Density Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials quinolones, combinations with other antibacterials None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.70 None 2.80 None 820 142 None None None None None
11745 11745 10015 None 10585 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.022 Kaspersen2018 Occurrence of quinolone resistant E. coli originating from different animal species in Norway Norway Observational 10044 10044 High Population Density Effect of high human population density (> 200 inhabitants per km2) compared to low human population density (< five inhabitants per km2) High Population Density Low Population Density Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials quinolones, combinations with other antibacterials None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.10 None 2.80 None 97 142 None None None None None
11746 11746 10015 None 10585 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.022 Kaspersen2018 Occurrence of quinolone resistant E. coli originating from different animal species in Norway Norway Observational 10051 10051 Medium Population Density Effect of medium human population density (five–200 inhabitants per km2) compared to low human population density (< five inhabitants per km2) Medium Population Density Low Population Density Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials quinolones, combinations with other antibacterials None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.40 None 0.00 None 709 86 None None None None None
11747 11747 10015 None 10585 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.022 Kaspersen2018 Occurrence of quinolone resistant E. coli originating from different animal species in Norway Norway Observational 10046 10046 High Population Density Effect of high human population density (> 200 inhabitants per km2) compared to low human population density (< five inhabitants per km2) High Population Density Low Population Density Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials quinolones, combinations with other antibacterials None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 122 86 None None None None None
11748 11748 10015 None 10585 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.022 Kaspersen2018 Occurrence of quinolone resistant E. coli originating from different animal species in Norway Norway Observational 10052 10052 Medium Population Density Effect of medium human population density (five–200 inhabitants per km2) compared to low human population density (< five inhabitants per km2) Medium Population Density Low Population Density Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials quinolones, combinations with other antibacterials None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.60 None 0.00 None 243 46 None None None None None
11749 11749 10015 None 10585 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.022 Kaspersen2018 Occurrence of quinolone resistant E. coli originating from different animal species in Norway Norway Observational 10047 10047 High Population Density Effect of high human population density (> 200 inhabitants per km2) compared to low human population density (< five inhabitants per km2) High Population Density Low Population Density Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials quinolones, combinations with other antibacterials None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 28 46 None None None None None
11752 11752 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10474 10474 Ceftiofur Use in Parent Cows Systemic ceftiofur treatment of parent cows. Ceftiofur Use No Use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.92 1.19 3.10 0.01 None
11753 11753 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10476 10476 Feeding Waste Milk Calves fed waste milk (milk produced by a cow treated with antimicrobials during lactation). Waste Milk Always or Occasionally Fed Waste Milk Never Fed Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.62 1.00 2.65 0.05 None
11754 11754 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10475 10475 Dihydrostreptomycin Use Dihydrostreptomycin Use (Oral). Dihydrostreptomycin Use No Use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.07 1.10 3.91 Not Reported None
11755 11755 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10478 10478 Herd Size None 63 to 98 Cows 28 to 62 Cows Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.67 1.09 2.56 0.02 None
11756 11756 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10475 10475 Dihydrostreptomycin Use Dihydrostreptomycin Use (Oral). Dihydrostreptomycin Use No Use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.73 1.14 2.64 0.01 None
11757 11757 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10473 10473 Calf Housing System None Single Pens Group Pens with Calves aged > 30 Days Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.01 1.10 3.65 0.02 None
11758 11758 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10472 10472 Calf Housing System None Group Pens with Calves aged < 30 Days Group Pens with Calves aged > 30 Days Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.17 1.09 4.31 0.03 None
11759 11759 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10478 10478 Herd Size None 63 to 98 Cows 28 to 62 Cows Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.15 1.23 3.77 0.01 None
11760 11760 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10477 10477 Herd Size None 100 to 1175 Cows 28 to 62 Cows Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.76 0.99 3.15 0.05 None
11761 11761 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10482 10482 Predominant Milking System None Milking Parlor Tiestall Milking Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.97 1.03 3.74 0.04 None
11762 11762 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10481 10481 Predominant Milking System None Automatic Milking System Tiestall Milking Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.22 0.67 2.24 0.51 None
11763 11763 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10483 10483 Tetracycline Use Systemic Tetracycline Treatment Tetracycline Use No Use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.79 1.12 2.84 0.001 None
11764 11764 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10476 10476 Feeding Waste Milk Calves fed waste milk (milk produced by a cow treated with antimicrobials during lactation). Waste Milk Always or Occasionally Fed Waste Milk Never Fed Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.34 0.06 0.94 0.04 None
11765 11765 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10475 10475 Dihydrostreptomycin Use Dihydrostreptomycin Use (Oral). Dihydrostreptomycin Use No Use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.26 1.13 4.48 0.02 None
11766 11766 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10480 10480 Predominant Breed None Swedish Red Swedish holstein Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.39 0.13 1.12 0.08 None
11767 11767 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10479 10479 Predominant Breed None Mixed Breeds Swedish Holstein Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.44 0.24 0.82 0.009 None
11768 11768 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10480 10480 Predominant Breed None Swedish Red Swedish holstein Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.34 0.13 0.91 0.03 None
11769 11769 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10479 10479 Predominant Breed None Mixed Breeds Swedish Holstein Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.41 0.23 0.75 0.004 None
11770 11770 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10480 10480 Predominant Breed None Swedish Red Swedish holstein Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.07 0.01 0.58 0.01 None
11771 11771 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10479 10479 Predominant Breed None Mixed Breeds Swedish Holstein Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.31 0.10 0.98 0.01 None
11772 11772 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10485 10485 Tetracycline Use Tetracycline Use (Systemic). Tetracycline Use No Use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.02 1.34 12.11 0.01 None
11773 11773 10087 None 12460 10.1017/s0950268810001524 Persoons2011 Risk factors for ceftiofur resistance in Escherichia coli from Belgian broilers Belgium Observational 10239 10239 Hygenic Treatment Resevoir Hygenic Condition of the Antimicrobial Treatment Resevoir Clean Unclean Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 5.18 1.55 17.29 < 0.01 None
11774 11774 10087 None 12460 10.1017/s0950268810001524 Persoons2011 Risk factors for ceftiofur resistance in Escherichia coli from Belgian broilers Belgium Observational 10235 10235 Acidification of Drinking Water None Non-acidified Drinking Water Acidified Drinking Water Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.47 1.05 11.50 < 0.05 None
11775 11775 10087 None 12460 10.1017/s0950268810001524 Persoons2011 Risk factors for ceftiofur resistance in Escherichia coli from Belgian broilers Belgium Observational 10238 10238 Feed Changes per Cycle None > 3 Feed Changes per Cycle <= 3 Feed Changes per Cycle Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 8.25 1.39 48.80 < 0.01 None
11776 11776 10087 None 12460 10.1017/s0950268810001524 Persoons2011 Risk factors for ceftiofur resistance in Escherichia coli from Belgian broilers Belgium Observational 10237 10237 Breed of Bird None Ross Cobb Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 9.14 2.30 36.41 < 0.01 None
11777 11777 10087 None 12460 10.1017/s0950268810001524 Persoons2011 Risk factors for ceftiofur resistance in Escherichia coli from Belgian broilers Belgium Observational 10241 10241 Litter Material None Straw Wood Curls Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 5.08 1.76 14.63 < 0.01 None
11778 11778 10087 None 12460 10.1017/s0950268810001524 Persoons2011 Risk factors for ceftiofur resistance in Escherichia coli from Belgian broilers Belgium Observational 10236 10236 Amoxicillin Use No AMU level provided. Amoxicillin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.76 2.16 10.50 <0.01 None
11779 11779 10087 None 12460 10.1017/s0950268810001524 Persoons2011 Risk factors for ceftiofur resistance in Escherichia coli from Belgian broilers Belgium Observational 10240 10240 Litter Material None Flax Wood Curls Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 8.04 2.00 32.41 < 0.01 None
11780 11780 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10471 10471 Calf Housing System None Group Pens Single Pens Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.65 1.48 4.75 0.001 None
11781 11781 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10478 10478 Herd Size None 63 to 98 Cows 28 to 62 Cows Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.36 1.19 9.51 0.02 None
11782 11782 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10477 10477 Herd Size None 100 to 1175 Cows 28 to 62 Cows Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.69 1.31 10.40 0.01 None
11783 11783 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10484 10484 Tetracycline Use Systemic Tetracycline Treatment of Calves Tetracycline Use No Use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.46 1.62 3.73 <0.001 None
40208 40208 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11324 11324 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None Beta-lactam antibacterials, penicillins, combinations with other antibacterials ampicillin, combinations with other antibacterials None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
11784 11784 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10725 10725 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Bulk Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 14.30 None 0.00 None 42 47 None None None 0.009 None
11785 11785 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10727 10727 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 28.00 None 0.00 None 50 47 None None None 0 None
11786 11786 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10726 10726 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Pasteurized Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 27.10 None 0.00 None 48 47 None None None 0 None
11787 11787 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10725 10725 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Bulk Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.40 None 0.00 None 42 47 None None None 0.472 None
11788 11788 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10727 10727 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 8.00 None 0.00 None 50 47 None None None 0.118 None
11789 11789 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10726 10726 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Pasteurized Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.20 None 0.00 None 48 47 None None None 0.495 None
11790 11790 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10725 10725 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Bulk Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.80 None 0.00 None 42 47 None None None 0.22 None
11791 11791 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10727 10727 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 18.00 None 0.00 None 50 47 None None None 0.003 None
11792 11792 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10726 10726 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Pasteurized Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 20.80 None 0.00 None 48 47 None None None 0.003 None
11793 11793 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10725 10725 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Bulk Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 11.90 None 8.50 None 42 47 None None None 0.73 None
11794 11794 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10727 10727 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 28.00 None 8.50 None 50 47 None None None 0.018 None
11795 11795 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10726 10726 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Pasteurized Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 27.10 None 8.50 None 48 47 None None None 0.146 None
11796 11796 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10725 10725 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Bulk Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 7.10 None 0.00 None 42 47 None None None 0.101 None
11797 11797 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10727 10727 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 8.00 None 0.00 None 50 47 None None None 0.118 None
11798 11798 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10726 10726 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Pasteurized Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.20 None 0.00 None 48 47 None None None 0.495 None
11799 11799 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10418 10418 Bambermycin Use Bambermycin used as a growth promotor, at 2 mg/kg in feed. Bambermycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 14 None 17 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11800 11800 10344 None 7258 10.1089/fpd.2014.1742 Agers_2014_FooPatandDis Spread of extended spectrum cephalosporinase-producing escherichia coli clones and plasmids from parent animals to broilers and to broiler meat in a production without use of cephalosporins Denmark None 11001 11001 Aminopenicillin Use Aminopenicillin use in the preceding 3 months. No AMU level provided. Aminopenicillin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Flock Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 46 None None None None None 17 171 None None None None None
11801 11801 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10421 10421 Penicillin Use Penicillin used as a growth promotor, at 2.2 mg/kg in feed. Penicillin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 14 None 17 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11802 11802 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10425 10425 Salinomycin Use Salinomycin used as a growth promotor, at 60 mg/kg in feed. Salinomycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 23 None 17 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11803 11803 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10415 10415 Bacitracin Use Bacitracin used as a growth promotor, at 4.4 mg/kg in feed. Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 17 None 17 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11804 11804 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10422 10422 Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use Salinomycin and bacitracin used as growth promotors, at 1.1 mg/kg and 3.3 mg/kg respectively. Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 17 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
11805 11805 10344 None 7258 10.1089/fpd.2014.1742 Agers_2014_FooPatandDis Spread of extended spectrum cephalosporinase-producing escherichia coli clones and plasmids from parent animals to broilers and to broiler meat in a production without use of cephalosporins Denmark None 11002 11002 Aminopenicillin Use Aminopenicillin use in the preceding 6 months. No AMU level provided. Aminopenicillin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Flock Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 42 None None None None None 29 159 None None None None None
11806 11806 10232 None 7342 10.1089/fpd.2010.0566 Alali_2010_FooPatandDis Prevalence and distribution of Salmonella in organic and conventional broiler poultry farms United States of America None 10679 10679 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 31 None None None None None 12 58 None None None 0.004 None
11807 11807 10232 None 7342 10.1089/fpd.2010.0566 Alali_2010_FooPatandDis Prevalence and distribution of Salmonella in organic and conventional broiler poultry farms United States of America None 10679 10679 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 4 None 4 None None None None None 12 58 None None None 0.025 None
11808 11808 10243 None 7541 Asai_2007_JaJoofInDi Association of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter isolated from food-producing animals with antimicrobial use on farms Japan Experimental 10717 10717 Fluoroquinolone Use Fluoroquinolone Use in the Past 6 Months Fluoroquinolone Use No Fluoroquinolone Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 2 None 18 None None None None None 2 78 None None None None None
11809 11809 10243 None 7541 Asai_2007_JaJoofInDi Association of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter isolated from food-producing animals with antimicrobial use on farms Japan Experimental 10721 10721 Tetracycline Use Tetracycline Use in the Past 6 Months Tetracycline Use No Tetracycline Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 3 None 33 None None None None None 7 73 None None None None None
11810 11810 10351 None 7585 10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.07.001 Avrain_2003_VeteMicr Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter from broilers: Association with production type and antimicrobial use France Observational 11034 11034 Avilamycin Use Standard (conventional) production. Avilamycin use No Use Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Flock Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 55 None 58 None None None None None 85 121 None None None None None
11811 11811 10253 None 8030 Boulianne_2016_CaJoofVeRe Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among escherichia coli and enterococcus spp. Isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada Canada Observational 10761 10761 Ceftiofur Use Ceftiofur Use at Hatchery. No AMU level provided. Ceftiofur Use No Use Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Flock Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 43 7 None None None None None
11812 11812 10253 None 8030 Boulianne_2016_CaJoofVeRe Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among escherichia coli and enterococcus spp. Isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada Canada Observational 10766 10766 Tetracycline Use Tetracycline use (feed additive or treatment). No AMU level provided. Tetracycline Use No Use Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Flock Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 98.00 None 1 49 None None None None None
11813 11813 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10647 10647 CTC Use Chlortetracycline Use (550 mg/kg of feed) CTC Use No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 56.30 None 71.90 None 96 96 None None None None None
11814 11814 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10649 10649 Elevated Copper Supplementation Elevated Copper Supplementation (125 mg/kg of feed vs 16.5 ppm) Elevated Copper Supplementation Standard Copper Supplementation Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 52.10 None 71.90 None 96 96 None None None None None
11815 11815 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10648 10648 Elevated Copper and CTC Use Elevated Copper and Chlortetracycline Use (125 mg/kg of feed vs 16.5 ppm; 550 mg/kg of feed) Elevated Copper and CTC Use Standard Copper and No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 61.50 None 71.90 None 96 96 None None None None None
11816 11816 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10927 10927 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin administered, in water, as Baytril 10% at 50 mg/L, at days 1 - 3. Resistance measured at day 18. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 65.00 None 11.00 None 26 26 None None None <0.001 None
11817 11817 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10927 10927 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin administered, in water, as Baytril 10% at 50 mg/L, at days 1 - 3. Resistance measured at day 18. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 85.00 None 54.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.016 None
11818 11818 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10647 10647 CTC Use Chlortetracycline Use (550 mg/kg of feed) CTC Use No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 49.00 None 61.50 None 96 96 None None None None None
11819 11819 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10649 10649 Elevated Copper Supplementation Elevated Copper Supplementation (125 mg/kg of feed vs 16.5 ppm) Elevated Copper Supplementation Standard Copper Supplementation Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 41.70 None 61.50 None 96 96 None None None None None
11820 11820 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10648 10648 Elevated Copper and CTC Use Elevated Copper and Chlortetracycline Use (125 mg/kg of feed vs 16.5 ppm; 550 mg/kg of feed) Elevated Copper and CTC Use Standard Copper and No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 59.40 None 61.50 None 96 96 None None None None None
11821 11821 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10817 10817 Growth Promotion Ban Pre-GP ban ('92-'96) vs. Post-GP Ban ('01-'02) in conventional production. GPs banned included avoparcin, virginiamycin, tylosin, spiramycin, bactracin. Growth Promoters Banned Growth Promoters Allowed Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 3.40 None 0.80 None 322 130 None None None None None
11822 11822 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10817 10817 Growth Promotion Ban Pre-GP ban ('92-'96) vs. Post-GP Ban ('01-'02) in conventional production. GPs banned included avoparcin, virginiamycin, tylosin, spiramycin, bactracin. Growth Promoters Banned Growth Promoters Allowed Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 3.40 None 5.30 None 323 132 None None None None None
11823 11823 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10817 10817 Growth Promotion Ban Pre-GP ban ('92-'96) vs. Post-GP Ban ('01-'02) in conventional production. GPs banned included avoparcin, virginiamycin, tylosin, spiramycin, bactracin. Growth Promoters Banned Growth Promoters Allowed Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 26.70 None 24.60 None 326 130 None None None None None
11824 11824 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10818 10818 Production Type Pre-GP ban ('92-'96). Free-range is comparable to organic production. Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 0.00 None 1.10 None 36 94 None None None None None
11825 11825 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10818 10818 Production Type Pre-GP ban ('92-'96). Free-range is comparable to organic production. Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 2.80 None 6.30 None 36 96 None None None None None
11826 11826 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10818 10818 Production Type Pre-GP ban ('92-'96). Free-range is comparable to organic production. Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 31.40 None 22.10 None 35 95 None None None None None
11827 11827 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10418 10418 Bambermycin Use Bambermycin used as a growth promotor, at 2 mg/kg in feed. Bambermycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11828 11828 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10421 10421 Penicillin Use Penicillin used as a growth promotor, at 2.2 mg/kg in feed. Penicillin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 0 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11829 11829 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10425 10425 Salinomycin Use Salinomycin used as a growth promotor, at 60 mg/kg in feed. Salinomycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11830 11830 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10415 10415 Bacitracin Use Bacitracin used as a growth promotor, at 4.4 mg/kg in feed. Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11831 11831 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10422 10422 Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use Salinomycin and bacitracin used as growth promotors, at 1.1 mg/kg and 3.3 mg/kg respectively. Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
11832 11832 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10418 10418 Bambermycin Use Bambermycin used as a growth promotor, at 2 mg/kg in feed. Bambermycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 20 None 23 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11833 11833 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10421 10421 Penicillin Use Penicillin used as a growth promotor, at 2.2 mg/kg in feed. Penicillin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 20 None 23 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11834 11834 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10425 10425 Salinomycin Use Salinomycin used as a growth promotor, at 60 mg/kg in feed. Salinomycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 25 None 23 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11835 11835 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10415 10415 Bacitracin Use Bacitracin used as a growth promotor, at 4.4 mg/kg in feed. Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 24 None 23 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
11836 11836 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10422 10422 Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use Salinomycin and bacitracin used as growth promotors, at 1.1 mg/kg and 3.3 mg/kg respectively. Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 23 None 23 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
11837 11837 20035 None 9756 10.1089/fpd.2008.0171 Han2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. in Louisiana retail chickens after the enrofloxacin ban United States of America Observational 11290 11290 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 0 None 10 None None None None None 48 117 None None None None None
11838 11838 20035 None 9756 10.1089/fpd.2008.0171 Han2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. in Louisiana retail chickens after the enrofloxacin ban United States of America Observational 11290 11290 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 10.40 None 23.90 None 48 117 None None None None None
11839 11839 20035 None 9756 10.1089/fpd.2008.0171 Han2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. in Louisiana retail chickens after the enrofloxacin ban United States of America Observational 11290 11290 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 37.50 None 29.10 None 48 117 None None None None None
11840 11840 20015 None 12591 10.1289/ehp.7647 Price2005 Fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter isolates from conventional and antibiotic-free chicken products United States of America Observational 11232 11232 Production Type Non-selective media used. Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False 3 None 12 None None None None None 33 43 None None None None None
11841 11841 20016 None 12593 10.1289/ehp.10050 Price2007 The persistence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter in poultry production United States of America Observational 11239 11239 Production Type Pre-2005 ban of fluoroquinolone use in poultry production (USA). Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False 3 None 17 None None None None None 88 64 None None None None None
11842 11842 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11107 11107 Chilling Method None Air Chilling Immersion Chilling Chicken Carcass None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 28 37 None None None None None
11843 11843 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11107 11107 Chilling Method None Air Chilling Immersion Chilling Chicken Carcass None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 60.00 None 66.70 None 28 37 None None None None None
11844 11844 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11107 11107 Chilling Method None Air Chilling Immersion Chilling Chicken Carcass None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 28 37 None None None None None
11845 11845 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11107 11107 Chilling Method None Air Chilling Immersion Chilling Chicken Carcass None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 80.00 None 86.70 None 28 37 None None None None None
11846 11846 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11107 11107 Chilling Method None Air Chilling Immersion Chilling Chicken Carcass None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 18.20 None 58.30 None 59 73 None None None None None
11847 11847 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11107 11107 Chilling Method None Air Chilling Immersion Chilling Chicken Carcass None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 18.20 None 41.70 None 59 73 None None None None None
11848 11848 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11107 11107 Chilling Method None Air Chilling Immersion Chilling Chicken Carcass None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 90.90 None 16.70 None 59 73 None None None None None
11849 11849 10327 None 13084 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.005 Sapkota_2014_ScofthToEn Lower prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella on large-scale U.S. conventional poultry farms that transitioned to organic practices United States of America None 10982 10982 Production Type Data for Salmonella Kentucky Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 2 None 4 None None None None None 32 9 None None None None None
11850 11850 10256 None 8117 10.2460/javma.231.2.275 Bunner_2007_JoofthAmVeMeAs Prevalence and pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods United States of America None 10776 10776 Production Type None Antimicrobial Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 3 None None None None None 498 883 None None None N/A None
11851 11851 10327 None 13084 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.005 Sapkota_2014_ScofthToEn Lower prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella on large-scale U.S. conventional poultry farms that transitioned to organic practices United States of America None 10982 10982 Production Type Data for Salmonella Kentucky Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 32 9 None None None None None
11852 11852 10327 None 13084 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.005 Sapkota_2014_ScofthToEn Lower prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella on large-scale U.S. conventional poultry farms that transitioned to organic practices United States of America None 10982 10982 Production Type Data for Salmonella Kentucky Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 32 None 8 None None None None None 32 9 None None None None None
11853 11853 10256 None 8117 10.2460/javma.231.2.275 Bunner_2007_JoofthAmVeMeAs Prevalence and pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods United States of America None 10776 10776 Production Type None Antimicrobial Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 498 883 None None None N/A None
11854 11854 10256 None 8117 10.2460/javma.231.2.275 Bunner_2007_JoofthAmVeMeAs Prevalence and pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods United States of America None 10776 10776 Production Type None Antimicrobial Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 355 None 803 None None None None None 498 883 2.38 1.29 4.42 0.006 None
11855 11855 10256 None 8117 10.2460/javma.231.2.275 Bunner_2007_JoofthAmVeMeAs Prevalence and pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods United States of America None 10776 10776 Production Type None Antimicrobial Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 4 None None None None None 498 883 2.26 0.26 19.69 0.461 None
11856 11856 10258 None 8181 10.1089/mdr.2014.0037 Callens_2015_MicrDrugResi Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring Belgium None 10778 10778 Ceftiofur Use Ceftiofur Use in Piglet Ceftiofur Use No Use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.40 None 0.20 None 298 565 None None None <0.01 None
11857 11857 10258 None 8181 10.1089/mdr.2014.0037 Callens_2015_MicrDrugResi Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring Belgium None 10781 10781 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin Use in Piglet Enrofloxacin Use No Use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.70 None 0.00 None 42 821 None None None <0.0001 None
11858 11858 10258 None 8181 10.1089/mdr.2014.0037 Callens_2015_MicrDrugResi Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring Belgium None 10777 10777 Amoxicillin Use Amoxicillin Use in Piglet Amoxicillin Use No Use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 49.30 None 7 856 None None None <0.0001 None
11859 11859 10258 None 8181 10.1089/mdr.2014.0037 Callens_2015_MicrDrugResi Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring Belgium None 10778 10778 Ceftiofur Use Ceftiofur Use in Piglet Ceftiofur Use No Use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 52.40 None 33.60 None 298 655 None None None <0.0001 None
11860 11860 10259 None 8187 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.02.017 Cameron.Veas_2016_VeteJour Shedding of cephalosporin resistant Escherichia coli in pigs from conventional farms after early treatment with antimicrobials Spain None 10786 10786 Tulathromycin Use Tulathromycin, administered via single IM injection, at 2.5 mg/kg of bw at 7 days of age, as Draxxin. Sampled 7 days post-treatment (14 days of age), aggregated across all 4 farms. Tulathromycin Use No Use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 90 None 48 None None None None None 159 118 None None None None None
11861 11861 10259 None 8187 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.02.017 Cameron.Veas_2016_VeteJour Shedding of cephalosporin resistant Escherichia coli in pigs from conventional farms after early treatment with antimicrobials Spain None 10784 10784 Ceftiofur Use Ceftiofur, administered via single IM injection, at 5 mg/kg bw at 7 days of age, as Naxcel. Sampled 7 days post-treatment (14 days of age), aggregated across all 4 farms. Ceftiofur Use No Use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 66 None 48 None None None None None 147 108 None None None None None
11862 11862 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10330 10330 Sarafloxacin Use Sarafloxacin, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 20 ppm over 5 days. Sarafloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
11863 11863 20023 None 13525 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.020 Soonthornchaikul2006 Resistance to three antimicrobial agents of Campylobacter isolated from organically- and intensively-reared chickens purchased from retail outlets United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 11257 11257 Production Type Pre-packaged products, purchased from the supermarket. Organic Intensive (Conventional) Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 2.90 None 120 125 None None None None None
11864 11864 20023 None 13525 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.020 Soonthornchaikul2006 Resistance to three antimicrobial agents of Campylobacter isolated from organically- and intensively-reared chickens purchased from retail outlets United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 11257 11257 Production Type Pre-packaged products, purchased from the supermarket. Organic Intensive (Conventional) Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 120 125 None None None None None
11865 11865 20023 None 13525 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.020 Soonthornchaikul2006 Resistance to three antimicrobial agents of Campylobacter isolated from organically- and intensively-reared chickens purchased from retail outlets United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 11256 11256 Packaging Type / Retail Location Intensive Production (Conventional Rearing) Products Unpackaged (Butcher) Pre-packaged (Supermarket) Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 11.60 None 2.90 None 150 125 None None None None None
11866 11866 20023 None 13525 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.020 Soonthornchaikul2006 Resistance to three antimicrobial agents of Campylobacter isolated from organically- and intensively-reared chickens purchased from retail outlets United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 11256 11256 Packaging Type / Retail Location Intensive Production (Conventional Rearing) Products Unpackaged (Butcher) Pre-packaged (Supermarket) Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 150 125 None None None None None
11867 11867 10235 None 7365 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.008 Alexander_2010_InJoofFoMi Farm-to-fork characterization of Escherichia coli associated with feedlot cattle with a known history of antimicrobial use Canada None 10688 10688 Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline sulfamethazine, administered in water, as Aureo S-700 (AS700), at 44 ppm. Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 3 None None None None None 14 18 None None None None None
11868 11868 10235 None 7365 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.008 Alexander_2010_InJoofFoMi Farm-to-fork characterization of Escherichia coli associated with feedlot cattle with a known history of antimicrobial use Canada None 10688 10688 Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline sulfamethazine, administered in water, as Aureo S-700 (AS700), at 44 ppm. Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 11 None None None None None 14 18 None None None None None
11869 11869 10065 None 11825 10.1089/fpd.2014.1808 Mollenkopf2014 Organic or antibiotic-free labeling does not impact the recovery of enteric pathogens and antimicrobial-resistant escherichia coli from fresh retail chicken United States of America None 10180 10180 Vacuum Packaging Measured as presence of CMY gene, following selective isolation. Vacuum Packaged Not Vacuum Packaged Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat None See gene column CMY-2 Salmonella spp. False None False 3 None 9 None None None None None 39 192 None None None None None
11870 11870 10065 None 11825 10.1089/fpd.2014.1808 Mollenkopf2014 Organic or antibiotic-free labeling does not impact the recovery of enteric pathogens and antimicrobial-resistant escherichia coli from fresh retail chicken United States of America None 10183 10183 Vacuum Packaging Measured as presence of QRDR mutation, following selective isolation. Vacuum Packaged Not Vacuum Packaged Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat None None None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 16 None None None None None 39 192 None None None None None
11871 11871 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10092 10092 CCFA 2/3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a two-thirds dose regimen (4.4 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Two-Thirds Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.17 None 0.97 None 240 723 None None None None None
11872 11872 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10093 10093 CCFA 3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a 3-dose regimen (6.6 mg/kg, SC, Day 0, 6, 13). CCFA Three Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.46 None 0.97 None 238 723 None None None None None
11873 11873 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10093 10093 CCFA 3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a 3-dose regimen (6.6 mg/kg, SC, Day 0, 6, 13). CCFA Three Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 70.20 None 25.60 None 238 723 None None None None None
11874 11874 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10091 10091 CCFA 1 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a single dose (6.6 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Single Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 19.20 None 4.43 None 240 723 None None None None None
11875 11875 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10092 10092 CCFA 2/3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a two-thirds dose regimen (4.4 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Two-Thirds Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 31.30 None 4.43 None 240 723 None None None None None
11876 11876 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10093 10093 CCFA 3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a 3-dose regimen (6.6 mg/kg, SC, Day 0, 6, 13). CCFA Three Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 57.10 None 4.43 None 238 723 None None None None None
11877 11877 10068 None 11881 10.1089/fpd.2010.0632 Morley2011 Effects of Restricted Antimicrobial Exposure on Antimicrobial Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli from Feedlot Cattle United States of America None 10186 10186 Production Type None Natural (ABF) Conventional Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 4 4165 5 4708 None None None None None None None None None None None
11878 11878 10068 None 11881 10.1089/fpd.2010.0632 Morley2011 Effects of Restricted Antimicrobial Exposure on Antimicrobial Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli from Feedlot Cattle United States of America None 10186 10186 Production Type None Natural (ABF) Conventional Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 0 4169 0 4713 None None None None None None None None None None None
11879 11879 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 2 None 10 None None None None None 3 10 None None None None None
11880 11880 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10376 10376 Continuous CTC Use Period 2. Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 11 10 None None None None None
11881 11881 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 12 None 10 None None None None None 14 10 None None None None None
11882 11882 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10378 10378 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 29 None 10 None None None None None 30 10 None None None None None
11883 11883 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 98.70 None 94.80 None 150 128 None None None None None
11884 11884 10065 None 11825 10.1089/fpd.2014.1808 Mollenkopf2014 Organic or antibiotic-free labeling does not impact the recovery of enteric pathogens and antimicrobial-resistant escherichia coli from fresh retail chicken United States of America None 10172 10172 Production Type Measured as presence of CMY gene, following selective isolation. Antibiotic Free Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat None See gene column CMY-2 Salmonella spp. False None False 2 None 8 None None None None None 96 95 None None None None None
11885 11885 10065 None 11825 10.1089/fpd.2014.1808 Mollenkopf2014 Organic or antibiotic-free labeling does not impact the recovery of enteric pathogens and antimicrobial-resistant escherichia coli from fresh retail chicken United States of America None 10178 10178 Production Type Measured as presence of QRDR mutation, following selective isolation. Antibiotic Free Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat None None None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 17 None None None None None 96 95 None None None None None
11886 11886 10065 None 11825 10.1089/fpd.2014.1808 Mollenkopf2014 Organic or antibiotic-free labeling does not impact the recovery of enteric pathogens and antimicrobial-resistant escherichia coli from fresh retail chicken United States of America None 10173 10173 Production Type Measured as presence of CMY gene, following selective isolation. Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat None See gene column CMY-2 Salmonella spp. False None False 2 None 8 None None None None None 40 95 None None None None None
11887 11887 10065 None 11825 10.1089/fpd.2014.1808 Mollenkopf2014 Organic or antibiotic-free labeling does not impact the recovery of enteric pathogens and antimicrobial-resistant escherichia coli from fresh retail chicken United States of America None 10179 10179 Production Type Measured as presence of QRDR mutation, following selective isolation. Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat None None None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 17 None None None None None 40 95 None None None None None
11888 11888 10235 None 7365 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.008 Alexander_2010_InJoofFoMi Farm-to-fork characterization of Escherichia coli associated with feedlot cattle with a known history of antimicrobial use Canada None 10688 10688 Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline sulfamethazine, administered in water, as Aureo S-700 (AS700), at 44 ppm. Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 3 None None None None None 14 18 None None None None None
11889 11889 20016 None 12593 10.1289/ehp.10050 Price2007 The persistence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter in poultry production United States of America Observational 11238 11238 Production Type Post-2005 ban of fluoroquinolone use in poultry production (USA). Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False 6 None 31 None None None None None 100 77 None None None None None
11890 11890 20015 None 12591 10.1289/ehp.7647 Price2005 Fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter isolates from conventional and antibiotic-free chicken products United States of America Observational 11233 11233 Production Type Selective media used. Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False 4 None 32 None None None None None 33 43 None None None None None
11891 11891 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10330 10330 Sarafloxacin Use Sarafloxacin, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 20 ppm over 5 days. Sarafloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
11892 11892 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10330 10330 Sarafloxacin Use Sarafloxacin, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 20 ppm over 5 days. Sarafloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 40.00 None 43.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
11893 11893 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10327 10327 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 25 ppm over 3 days. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 30.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
11894 11894 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10327 10327 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 25 ppm over 3 days. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
11895 11895 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10327 10327 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 25 ppm over 3 days. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 40.00 None 43.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
11896 11896 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10328 10328 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 25 ppm over 5 days. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
11897 11897 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10328 10328 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 25 ppm over 5 days. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
11898 11898 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10328 10328 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 25 ppm over 5 days. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 97.00 None 43.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
11899 11899 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11141 11141 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 0 None 76 None None None None None 165 167 None None None None None
11900 11900 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11141 11141 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 15 None 0 None None None None None 165 167 None None None None None
11901 11901 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11141 11141 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Combination False None False 99 None 141 None None None None None 165 167 None None None None None
11903 11903 10381 None 60001 Aksoy et al. (2005) Verotoxin production in strains of Escherichia coli isolated from cattle and sheep, and their resistance to antibiotics Turkey Observational 11088 11088 Sex Sex of cattle female male Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 47 None 49 None 74.60 None 41.90 None 63 117 None None None None None
11904 11904 10381 None 60001 Aksoy et al. (2005) Verotoxin production in strains of Escherichia coli isolated from cattle and sheep, and their resistance to antibiotics Turkey Observational 11087 11087 Age Age of cattle 0-2 yrs 3+ years Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 36 None 60 None 64.00 None 48.00 None 56 124 None None None None None
11905 11905 10234 None 7363 10.1128/AEM.00489-08 Alexander_2008_AppandEnvMic Effect of subtherapeutic administration of antibiotics on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli bacteria in feedlot cattle Canada None 10680 10680 Chlortetracycline and Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline and Sulfamethazine Use (44ppm fed as Aureo S-700 G), non-selective media. Chlortetracycline and Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 284 None 36 None None None None None 683 695 None None None None None
11906 11906 10234 None 7363 10.1128/AEM.00489-08 Alexander_2008_AppandEnvMic Effect of subtherapeutic administration of antibiotics on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli bacteria in feedlot cattle Canada None 10682 10682 Chlortetracycline Use Chlortetracycline Use (11ppm fed as Aureomycin-100 G) Chlortetracycline Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 99 None 36 None None None None None 670 695 None None None None None
11907 11907 10234 None 7363 10.1128/AEM.00489-08 Alexander_2008_AppandEnvMic Effect of subtherapeutic administration of antibiotics on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli bacteria in feedlot cattle Canada None 10683 10683 Monensin Use Monensin Use (25 ppm fed as Rumensin) Monensin Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 38 None 36 None None None None None 457 695 None None None None None
11908 11908 10234 None 7363 10.1128/AEM.00489-08 Alexander_2008_AppandEnvMic Effect of subtherapeutic administration of antibiotics on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli bacteria in feedlot cattle Canada None 10684 10684 Tylosin Phosphate Use Tylosin Phosphate Use (11ppm fed as Tylan) Tylosin Phosphate Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 53 None 36 None None None None None 552 695 None None None None None
11909 11909 10234 None 7363 10.1128/AEM.00489-08 Alexander_2008_AppandEnvMic Effect of subtherapeutic administration of antibiotics on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli bacteria in feedlot cattle Canada None 10686 10686 Virginiamycin Use Virginiamycin Use (31 ppm fed as V-max) Virginiamycin Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 21 None 36 None None None None None 455 695 None None None None None
11910 11910 10395 None 60005 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Carson et al. (2008) Antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli from 29 beef farms in Ontario Canada Observational 11089 11089 Production Stage None Feedlot Beef Operation Cow-Calf Operation Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 25.10 None 9.60 None 993 807 None None None None None
11911 11911 10395 None 60005 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Carson et al. (2008) Antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli from 29 beef farms in Ontario Canada Observational 11089 11089 Production Stage None Feedlot Beef Operation Cow-Calf Operation Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 993 807 None None None None None
11912 11912 10267 None 8370 Checkley_2010_CanaVeteJour Associations between antimicrobial use and the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle in western Canada Canada None 10805 10805 Prophylactic Oxytetracycline Use (Terramycin-50 Premix fed at 110 g/kg, 14 day) Prophylactic Oxytetracycline Use (Terramycin-50 Premix fed at 110 g/kg, 14 day) Oxytetracycline Use No Oxytetracycline Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 54 None 51 None None None None None 84 94 None None None None None
11913 11913 10267 None 8370 Checkley_2010_CanaVeteJour Associations between antimicrobial use and the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle in western Canada Canada None 10804 10804 Metaphylactic Oxytetracycline Use (20 mg/kg Liquamycin LA-200, subcut) Metaphylactic Oxytetracycline Use (20 mg/kg Liquamycin LA-200, subcut) Oxytetracycline Use No Oxytetracycline Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 47 None 51 None None None None None 94 94 None None None None None
11914 11914 10146 None 8528 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-10-495 Cook2011 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichiae coli isolated from retail milk-fed veal meat from Southern Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10397 10397 Veal Type None Grain-fed Veal Milk-fed Veal Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 47.69 None 64.00 None 1258 392 None None None None None
11915 11915 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10647 10647 CTC Use Chlortetracycline Use (550 mg/kg of feed) CTC Use No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 92.70 None 96 96 None None None None None
11916 11916 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10650 10650 Elevated Copper Supplementation Elevated Copper Supplementation (125 mg/kg of feed) vs 16.5 ppm Elevated Copper Supplementation Standard Copper Supplementation Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 97.90 None 92.70 None 96 96 None None None None None
11917 11917 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10648 10648 Elevated Copper and CTC Use Elevated Copper and Chlortetracycline Use (125 mg/kg of feed vs 16.5 ppm; 550 mg/kg of feed) Elevated Copper and CTC Use Standard Copper and No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 95.80 None 92.70 None 96 96 None None None None None
11918 11918 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10647 10647 CTC Use Chlortetracycline Use (550 mg/kg of feed) CTC Use No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides azithromycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 6.70 None 13.30 None 30 30 None None None None None
11919 11919 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10650 10650 Elevated Copper Supplementation Elevated Copper Supplementation (125 mg/kg of feed) vs 16.5 ppm Elevated Copper Supplementation Standard Copper Supplementation Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides azithromycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.70 None 13.30 None 27 30 None None None None None
11920 11920 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10648 10648 Elevated Copper and CTC Use Elevated Copper and Chlortetracycline Use (125 mg/kg of feed vs 16.5 ppm; 550 mg/kg of feed) Elevated Copper and CTC Use Standard Copper and No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides azithromycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 16.70 None 13.30 None 30 30 None None None None None
11921 11921 10172 None 9010 10.1089/fpd.2009.0417 Edrington2010 Influence of wet distiller's grains on prevalence of <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157:H7 and <i>Salmonella</> in feedlot cattle and antimicrobial susceptibility of generic <i>Escherichia coli<i> isolates United States of America None 10495 10495 Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Steam Flaked Corn Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Steam Flaked Corn Inclusion of WDG No WDG Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 2 None None None None None 18 18 None None None None None
11922 11922 10172 None 9010 10.1089/fpd.2009.0417 Edrington2010 Influence of wet distiller's grains on prevalence of <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157:H7 and <i>Salmonella</> in feedlot cattle and antimicrobial susceptibility of generic <i>Escherichia coli<i> isolates United States of America None 10494 10494 Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Dry Rolled Corn Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Dry Rolled Corn Inclusion of WDG No WDG Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 18 18 None None None None None
11923 11923 20034 None 9730 10.4315/0362-028x-69.3.482 Halbert2006 Genetic mechanisms contributing to reduced tetracycline susceptibility of Campylobacter isolated from organic and conventional dairy farms in the Midwestern and Northeastern United States United States of America Observational 11289 11289 Production Type Production Type Organic Dairy Farms Conventional Dairy Farms Cattle None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 48.00 None 58.00 None 304 912 None None None <0.01 None
11924 11924 10014 None 10526 10.1128/jcm.00169-08 Kaneene2008 Changes in tetracycline susceptibility of enteric bacteria following switching to nonmedicated milk replacer for dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10043 10043 Discontinuation of Medicated Milk Replacer (OXY, NEO) Discontinuation of Medicated Milk Replacer (OXY, NEO) Discontinued Administration of Medicated Milk Replacer Continued Administration of Medicated Milk Replacer Cattle None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 90.70 None 97.80 None 578 834 None None None 0.0004 None
11925 11925 10014 None 10526 10.1128/jcm.00169-08 Kaneene2008 Changes in tetracycline susceptibility of enteric bacteria following switching to nonmedicated milk replacer for dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10043 10043 Discontinuation of Medicated Milk Replacer (OXY, NEO) Discontinuation of Medicated Milk Replacer (OXY, NEO) Discontinued Administration of Medicated Milk Replacer Continued Administration of Medicated Milk Replacer Cattle None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella None False None False None None None None 54.60 None 100.00 None 11 144 None None None 0.3892 None
11926 11926 10014 None 10526 10.1128/jcm.00169-08 Kaneene2008 Changes in tetracycline susceptibility of enteric bacteria following switching to nonmedicated milk replacer for dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10043 10043 Discontinuation of Medicated Milk Replacer (OXY, NEO) Discontinuation of Medicated Milk Replacer (OXY, NEO) Discontinued Administration of Medicated Milk Replacer Continued Administration of Medicated Milk Replacer Cattle None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 92.30 None 91.70 None 13 12 None None None 1 None
11927 11927 10036 None 11115 10.4315/0362-028x-67.7.1433 LeJeune2004 Microbiological quality of ground beef from conventionally-reared cattle and raised without antibiotics label claims United States of America Experimental 10082 10082 Production Type None ABF (Natural) Conventional Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 19.20 None 18.20 None 73 77 None None None 0.84 None
11928 11928 10084 None 12443 10.3168/jds.2014-8588 Pereira2014a Effect of preweaned dairy calf housing system on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli United States of America None 10232 10232 Housing System None Individual Pens (Non-acidified Milk) Group Pens (Acidified Milk) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 77.00 None 70.00 None 903 1057 None None None 0.04 None
11929 11929 10084 None 12443 10.3168/jds.2014-8588 Pereira2014a Effect of preweaned dairy calf housing system on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli United States of America None 10232 10232 Housing System None Individual Pens (Non-acidified Milk) Group Pens (Acidified Milk) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 5.00 None 903 1057 None None None 0.1 None
11930 11930 10084 None 12443 10.3168/jds.2014-8588 Pereira2014a Effect of preweaned dairy calf housing system on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli United States of America None 10232 10232 Housing System None Individual Pens (Non-acidified Milk) Group Pens (Acidified Milk) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 72.00 None 59.00 None 903 1057 None None None <0.0001 None
11931 11931 10086 None 12445 10.1371/journal.pone.0115223 Pereira2014b In Vivo Selection of Resistant E. coli after Ingestion of Milk with Added Drug Residues United States of America None 10234 10234 Drug Residues in Milk Drug residues included ceftiofur, penicillin, ampicillin, and oxytetracycline at concentrations of 0.1, 0.005, 0.01, and 0.3 mg/ml, respectively. Milk fed with Drug Residues Milk fed without Drug Residues Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 81.00 None 44.00 None 270 270 None None None None None
11932 11932 10086 None 12445 10.1371/journal.pone.0115223 Pereira2014b In Vivo Selection of Resistant E. coli after Ingestion of Milk with Added Drug Residues United States of America None 10234 10234 Drug Residues in Milk Drug residues included ceftiofur, penicillin, ampicillin, and oxytetracycline at concentrations of 0.1, 0.005, 0.01, and 0.3 mg/ml, respectively. Milk fed with Drug Residues Milk fed without Drug Residues Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.00 None 1.00 None 270 270 None None None None None
11933 11933 10083 None 12442 10.3168/jds.2014-8521 Pereira2014 Effect of on-farm use of antimicrobial drugs on resistance in fecal Escherichia coli of preweaned dairy calves United States of America None 10231 10231 Enrofloxacin Use Use defined as one at least one treatment with enrofloxacin from birth to sampling. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 66.00 None 60.00 None 152 1271 None None None 0.3 None
11934 11934 10083 None 12442 10.3168/jds.2014-8521 Pereira2014 Effect of on-farm use of antimicrobial drugs on resistance in fecal Escherichia coli of preweaned dairy calves United States of America None 10230 10230 Ceftiofur Use Use defined as one at least one treatment with enrofloxacin from birth to sampling. Ceftiofur Use No Use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 97.00 None 57.00 None 144 1279 None None None 0.08 None
11935 11935 10256 None 8117 10.2460/javma.231.2.275 Bunner_2007_JoofthAmVeMeAs Prevalence and pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods United States of America None 10776 10776 Production Type None Antimicrobial Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 65 None 213 None None None None None 498 883 2.02 1.29 3.18 0.002 None
11936 11936 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11104 11104 Heifer-raiser Type Heifer-raiser Type Multi-source Heifer Raiser Single (Home) Farm Heifer Raiser Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 31.00 None 22.00 None 429 429 None None None 0.2 None
11937 11937 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11106 11106 Logistical Status at Heifer-raiser Logistical Status at Heifer-raiser Recent Arrival (< 2 mo.) to Heifer Raiser Approaching Departure from Heifer Raiser (2 - 3 mo.) Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 42.00 None 11.00 None 428 430 None None None <0.0001 None
11939 11939 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10250 10250 Production Type None Organic Conventional Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 8 None 29 None None None None None 26 69 None None None None None
11940 11940 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10250 10250 Production Type None Organic Conventional Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. False None False 3 None 10 None None None None None 26 69 None None None None None
11941 11941 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10284 10284 Production Type Production Type (Calves) Organic Conventional Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 100 None 155 None None None None None 281 284 None None None None None
11942 11942 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10285 10285 Production Type Production Type (Cows) Organic Conventional Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 25 None None None None None 270 286 None None None None None
11943 11943 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10316 10316 Chlortetracycline Use Chlortetracycline, fed as Aureomycin-100G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
11944 11944 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10315 10315 Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine, fed as Aureo S-700G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC and Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
11945 11945 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10091 10091 CCFA 1 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a single dose (6.6 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Single Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 43.80 None 25.60 None 240 723 None None None None None
11946 11946 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10092 10092 CCFA 2/3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a two-thirds dose regimen (4.4 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Two-Thirds Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 53.80 None 25.60 None 240 723 None None None None None
11947 11947 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10091 10091 CCFA 1 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a single dose (6.6 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Single Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.42 None 0.97 None 240 723 None None None None None
11948 11948 10258 None 8181 10.1089/mdr.2014.0037 Callens_2015_MicrDrugResi Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring Belgium None 10777 10777 Amoxicillin Use Amoxicillin Use in Piglet Amoxicillin Use No Use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 42.90 None 36.00 None 7 856 None None None <0.05 None
11949 11949 10258 None 8181 10.1089/mdr.2014.0037 Callens_2015_MicrDrugResi Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring Belgium None 10778 10778 Ceftiofur Use Ceftiofur Use in Piglet Ceftiofur Use No Use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 34.20 None 28.90 None 298 565 None None None 0.01 None
11950 11950 10258 None 8181 10.1089/mdr.2014.0037 Callens_2015_MicrDrugResi Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring Belgium None 10781 10781 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin Use in Piglet Enrofloxacin Use No Use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 57.10 None 35.00 None 42 821 None None None <0.01 None
11951 11951 10115 None 13358 10.1637/1933-5334(2007)2[e17:ciopaa]2.0.co;2 Siemon2007 Comparative Investigation of Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella between Pasture and Conventionally Reared Poultry United States of America Observational 10325 10325 Production Type Pasture poultry farms rear broilers outside, in small, moveable pens. Pastured Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 37 None 67 None None None None None 162 188 None None None None None
11952 11952 10115 None 13358 10.1637/1933-5334(2007)2[e17:ciopaa]2.0.co;2 Siemon2007 Comparative Investigation of Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella between Pasture and Conventionally Reared Poultry United States of America Observational 10325 10325 Production Type Pasture poultry farms rear broilers outside, in small, moveable pens. Pastured Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 67 None None None None None 162 188 None None None None None
11957 11957 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10258 10258 Aminoglycoside Use (past 12 mo.) [Suckling Pigs] Aminoglycoside Use (past 12 mo.) [Suckling Pigs] Aminoglycoside Use No Aminoglycoside Use Swine None None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.40 1.10 5.50 0.04 None
11958 11958 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10257 10257 Aminoglycoside Use (past 12 mo.) [Nursery Pigs] Aminoglycoside Use (past 12 mo.) [Nursery Pigs] Aminoglycoside Use No Aminoglycoside Use Swine None None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.20 1.50 3.10 <0.0001 None
11959 11959 10229 None 7332 Akwar_2008_CaJoofVeRe_1 Associations of antimicrobial uses with antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from pigs on 47 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario and British Columbia Canada None 10665 10665 Tiamulin Use Tiamulin use in feed Tiamulin Use No Tiamulin Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.45 1.10 10.86 0.0342 None
11960 11960 10229 None 7332 Akwar_2008_CaJoofVeRe_1 Associations of antimicrobial uses with antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from pigs on 47 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario and British Columbia Canada None 10655 10655 Ceftiofur Use Ceftiofur use at farm level Ceftiofur Use No Ceftiofur Use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 6.12 2.14 17.51 0 None
11961 11961 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10517 10517 Production Type Production Type Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 249 None 79 None None None None None 282 85 None None None 0.22 None
11962 11962 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10515 10515 Production Type None Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 282 85 None None None N/A None
11963 11963 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10547 10547 Use of Tetracyclines in the Past 6 Months Use of Tetracyclines in the Past 6 Months Use of Tetracyclines No Use of Tetracyclines Swine None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 83.30 None 60.40 None 66 356 None None None None None
11964 11964 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10545 10545 Use of Pencillins in the Past 6 Months Use of Pencillins in the Past 6 Months Use of Penicillins No Use of Penicillins Swine None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 73.50 None 60.40 None 34 356 None None None None None
11965 11965 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10544 10544 Use of Methaprim-Sulfonamide Combinations in the Past 6 Months Use of Methaprim-Sulfonamide Combinations in the Past 6 Months Use of Methaprim-sulfonamides No Use of Methaprim-sulfonamides Swine None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 69.70 None 60.40 None 33 356 None None None None None
11966 11966 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10546 10546 Use of Penicillin-Streptomycin Combinations in the Past 6 Months Use of Penicillin-Streptomycin Combinations in the Past 6 Months Use of Penicillin-Streptomycins No Use of Penicillin-Streptomycin Swine None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 77.30 None 60.40 None 22 356 None None None None None
11967 11967 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10122 10122 Tetracycline Use None Tetracycline Use No Tetracycline Use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 37 None 119 None 82.20 None 58.10 None 45 205 None None None 0.002 None
11968 11968 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10115 10115 Macrolide Use None Macrolide Use No Macrolide Use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 29 None 127 None 76.30 None 59.90 None 38 212 None None None 0.054 None
11969 11969 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10117 10117 Phenicol Use None Phenicol Use No Phenicol Use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 147 None 90.00 None 61.30 None 10 240 None None None 0.1 None
11970 11970 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10120 10120 Sulfamethoxole-trimethoprim Use None Sulfamethoxole-trimethoprim Use No Sulfamethoxole-trimethoprim Use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 19 None 137 None 79.20 None 60.60 None 24 226 None None None 0.07 None
11971 11971 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10112 10112 Fluoroquinolone Use None Fluoroquinolone Use No Fluoroquinolone Use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 151 None 100.00 None 61.60 None 5 245 None None None 0.16 None
11972 11972 10069 None 11884 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01023.x Moro2000 Effects of heat stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10188 10188 Heat Stress Exposure to temperatures of 34 degrees celcius, at 65% humidity, for 24 hours. Measured via fecal sample. Stress Pre-stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Abattoir Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 75 None 35 None None None None None 100 100 None None None None None
11973 11973 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10955 10955 Production Type Predominantly C. coli (99.8%), sampled at farrowing, nursery, and finishing. Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 48.20 None 88.30 None 903 1099 None None None <0.01 None
40209 40209 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11324 11324 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
11974 11974 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10954 10954 Production Type Predominantly C. coli (98.3%). Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 49.40 None 82.90 None 156 158 None None None <0.01 None
11975 11975 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10948 10948 Chlortetracycline Use Chlortetracycline Use (Finishing, C. coli) [400 g/ton]. Chlortetracycline Use No Chlortetracycline Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False 341 None 49 None None None None None 369 52 None None None 0.63 None
11976 11976 10091 None 12742 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-11-469 Rasschaert2012 Effect of farm type on within-herd Salmonella prevalence, serovar distribution, and antimicrobial resistance Belgium Observational 10249 10249 Farm Type Farm Type Open Farm (Grow-to-Finish) Closed Farm (Farrow-to-Finish) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 79 None 23 None None None None None 125 83 None None None <0.001 None
11977 11977 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11241 11241 Production Type None Antimicrobial Free Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Combination False None False 85 None 216 None None None None None 174 290 None None None None None
11978 11978 10332 None 13707 10.1089/fpd.2010.0665 Tadesse_2011_FooPatandDis Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Campylobacter Spp. Isolated from conventional and antimicrobial-free swine production systems from different U.S. regions United States of America Observational 10986 10986 Production Type Production Type [at Finishing] ABF Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False 325 None 294 None None None None None 490 446 None None None None None
11979 11979 10332 None 13707 10.1089/fpd.2010.0665 Tadesse_2011_FooPatandDis Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Campylobacter Spp. Isolated from conventional and antimicrobial-free swine production systems from different U.S. regions United States of America Observational 10989 10989 Production Type Production Type [at Post-Chill] ABF Conventional Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False 9 None 8 None None None None None 12 17 None None None None None
11980 11980 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10341 10341 ABF Rearing Practice Here, ABF (antibiotic-free) is defined as no exposure post-weaning. Under the extensive ABF system, pigs have free access to the environment and are placed in barricaded fields - pigs in the intensive system are placed in confined barns with concrete slat Extensive (Roamed) Intensive (Confined) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 202 None None None None None 1 226 None None None None None
11981 11981 10068 None 11881 10.1089/fpd.2010.0632 Morley2011 Effects of Restricted Antimicrobial Exposure on Antimicrobial Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli from Feedlot Cattle United States of America None 10186 10186 Production Type None Natural (ABF) Conventional Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 1436 2733 2052 2661 None None None None None None None None None None None
11982 11982 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10375 10375 Continuous CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 98.40 None 94.80 None 126 128 None None None None None
11983 11983 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 96.70 None 94.80 None 150 128 None None None None None
11984 11984 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 98.00 None 94.80 None 146 128 None None None None None
11985 11985 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 3 10 None None None None None
11986 11986 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10376 10376 Continuous CTC Use Period 2. Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 11 10 None None None None None
11987 11987 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 14 10 None None None None None
11988 11988 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 10 None None None None None
11989 11989 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.70 None 0.80 None 150 128 None None None None None
11990 11990 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10375 10375 Continuous CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.80 None 0.80 None 126 128 None None None None None
11991 11991 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.80 None 150 128 None None None None None
11992 11992 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.80 None 146 128 None None None None None
11993 11993 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10647 10647 CTC Use Chlortetracycline Use (550 mg/kg of feed) CTC Use No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 60.40 None 76.00 None 96 96 None None None None None
11994 11994 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10650 10650 Elevated Copper Supplementation Elevated Copper Supplementation (125 mg/kg of feed) vs 16.5 ppm Elevated Copper Supplementation Standard Copper Supplementation Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 53.10 None 76.00 None 96 96 None None None None None
11995 11995 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10648 10648 Elevated Copper and CTC Use Elevated Copper and Chlortetracycline Use (125 mg/kg of feed vs 16.5 ppm; 550 mg/kg of feed) Elevated Copper and CTC Use Standard Copper and No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 66.70 None 76.00 None 96 96 None None None None None
11996 11996 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10647 10647 CTC Use Chlortetracycline Use (550 mg/kg of feed) CTC Use No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 56.30 None 72.90 None 96 96 None None None None None
11997 11997 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10650 10650 Elevated Copper Supplementation Elevated Copper Supplementation (125 mg/kg of feed) vs 16.5 ppm Elevated Copper Supplementation Standard Copper Supplementation Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 52.10 None 72.90 None 96 96 None None None None None
11998 11998 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10648 10648 Elevated Copper and CTC Use Elevated Copper and Chlortetracycline Use (125 mg/kg of feed vs 16.5 ppm; 550 mg/kg of feed) Elevated Copper and CTC Use Standard Copper and No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 62.50 None 72.90 None 96 96 None None None None None
11999 11999 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10647 10647 CTC Use Chlortetracycline Use (550 mg/kg of feed) CTC Use No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 45.80 None 62.50 None 96 96 None None None None None
12000 12000 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10650 10650 Elevated Copper Supplementation Elevated Copper Supplementation (125 mg/kg of feed) vs 16.5 ppm Elevated Copper Supplementation Standard Copper Supplementation Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 42.70 None 62.50 None 96 96 None None None None None
12001 12001 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10648 10648 Elevated Copper and CTC Use Elevated Copper and Chlortetracycline Use (125 mg/kg of feed vs 16.5 ppm; 550 mg/kg of feed) Elevated Copper and CTC Use Standard Copper and No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 60.40 None 62.50 None 96 96 None None None None None
12002 12002 10256 None 8117 10.2460/javma.231.2.275 Bunner_2007_JoofthAmVeMeAs Prevalence and pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods United States of America None 10776 10776 Production Type None Antimicrobial Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False 8 490 33 850 1.60 None 3.70 None 498 883 2.40 0.92 6.24 0.072 None
12003 12003 10232 None 7342 10.1089/fpd.2010.0566 Alali_2010_FooPatandDis Prevalence and distribution of Salmonella in organic and conventional broiler poultry farms United States of America None 10679 10679 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 5 None None None None None 12 58 None None None 0.579 None
12004 12004 10256 None 8117 10.2460/javma.231.2.275 Bunner_2007_JoofthAmVeMeAs Prevalence and pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods United States of America None 10776 10776 Production Type None Antimicrobial Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 498 0 883 0.00 None 0.00 None 498 883 None None None N/A None
12005 12005 10256 None 8117 10.2460/javma.231.2.275 Bunner_2007_JoofthAmVeMeAs Prevalence and pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods United States of America None 10776 10776 Production Type None Antimicrobial Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 0 498 0 883 0.00 None 0.00 None 498 883 None None None N/A None
12006 12006 10258 None 8181 10.1089/mdr.2014.0037 Callens_2015_MicrDrugResi Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring Belgium None 10781 10781 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin Use in Piglet Enrofloxacin Use No Use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 73.80 None 48.50 None 42 821 None None None <0.0001 None
12007 12007 10258 None 8181 10.1089/mdr.2014.0037 Callens_2015_MicrDrugResi Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring Belgium None 10779 10779 Ceftiofur Use Ceftiofur Use in Piglet. Factor derived from reported odds ratio, not contingency table, as data were missing. Ceftiofur Use No Use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 25.20 None 3.20 None None None 31.08 4.78 202.27 <0.01 None
12008 12008 10258 None 8181 10.1089/mdr.2014.0037 Callens_2015_MicrDrugResi Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring Belgium None 10781 10781 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin Use in Piglet Enrofloxacin Use No Use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 47.60 None 7.10 None 42 821 None None None <0.0001 None
12009 12009 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10517 10517 Production Type Production Type Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False 2 None 12 None None None None None 282 85 None None None <0.001 None
12010 12010 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10517 10517 Production Type Production Type Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 35 None 30 None None None None None 282 85 None None None <0.001 None
12011 12011 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10515 10515 Production Type None Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 5 None None None None None 282 85 None None None 0.11 None
12012 12012 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10547 10547 Use of Tetracyclines in the Past 6 Months Use of Tetracyclines in the Past 6 Months Use of Tetracyclines No Use of Tetracyclines Swine None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 36.40 None 21.90 None 66 356 None None None None None
12013 12013 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10545 10545 Use of Pencillins in the Past 6 Months Use of Pencillins in the Past 6 Months Use of Penicillins No Use of Penicillins Swine None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 38.20 None 21.90 None 34 356 None None None None None
12014 12014 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10544 10544 Use of Methaprim-Sulfonamide Combinations in the Past 6 Months Use of Methaprim-Sulfonamide Combinations in the Past 6 Months Use of Methaprim-sulfonamides No Use of Methaprim-sulfonamides Swine None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 27.30 None 21.90 None 33 356 None None None None None
12015 12015 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10546 10546 Use of Penicillin-Streptomycin Combinations in the Past 6 Months Use of Penicillin-Streptomycin Combinations in the Past 6 Months Use of Penicillin-Streptomycins No Use of Penicillin-Streptomycin Swine None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 50.00 None 21.90 None 22 356 None None None None None
12016 12016 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10108 10108 Beta-lactam Use None Beta-lactam Use No Beta-lactam Use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 51 None 42.30 None 22.80 None 26 224 None None None 0.052 None
12017 12017 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10115 10115 Macrolide Use None Macrolide Use No Macrolide Use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 47 None 39.50 None 22.20 None 38 212 None None None 0.02 None
12018 12018 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10124 10124 Use of Synthetic Feed Additives None Synthetic Feed Additive Use No Synthetic Feed Additive Use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 54 None 14.80 None 27.60 None 54 196 None None None 0.055 None
12019 12019 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10120 10120 Sulfamethoxole-trimethoprim Use None Sulfamethoxole-trimethoprim Use No Sulfamethoxole-trimethoprim Use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 11 None 12.50 None 4.90 None 24 226 None None None 0.14 None
12020 12020 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10112 10112 Fluoroquinolone Use None Fluoroquinolone Use No Fluoroquinolone Use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 12 None 40.00 None 4.90 None 5 245 None None None 0.03 None
12021 12021 10047 None 11457 10.1089/mdr.2014.0311 Makita2016 Multivariable Analysis of the Association between Antimicrobial Use and Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated from Apparently Healthy Pigs in Japan Japan Observational 10114 10114 Fluoroquinolone Use None Fluoroquinolone Use NoFluoroquinolone Use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 3 None 20.00 None 1.20 None 5 245 None None None 0.08 None
12022 12022 10069 None 11884 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01023.x Moro2000 Effects of heat stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10188 10188 Heat Stress Exposure to temperatures of 34 degrees celcius, at 65% humidity, for 24 hours. Measured via fecal sample. Stress Pre-stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Abattoir Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False 75 None 35 None None None None None 100 100 None None None None None
12023 12023 10351 None 7585 10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.07.001 Avrain_2003_VeteMicr Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter from broilers: Association with production type and antimicrobial use France Observational 11036 11036 Tetracycline Use Export production. Tetracycline Use No Use Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Flock Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 6 None 7 None None None None None 16 57 None None None None None
12024 12024 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11241 11241 Production Type None Antimicrobial Free Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides azithromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 35 None 200 None None None None None 174 290 None None None None None
12025 12025 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11241 11241 Production Type None Antimicrobial Free Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 37 None 198 None None None None None 174 290 None None None None None
12026 12026 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11240 11240 Production Type None ABF Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 6 None 11 None None None None None 174 290 None None None None None
12027 12027 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11241 11241 Production Type None Antimicrobial Free Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter Combination False None False 6 None 13 None None None None None 174 290 None None None None None
12028 12028 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10260 10260 Beta-Lactam Use Beta-Lactam Use Beta-Lactam Use No Beta-Lactam Use Swine None None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.80 1.60 5.00 0.0005 None
12029 12029 10332 None 13707 10.1089/fpd.2010.0665 Tadesse_2011_FooPatandDis Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Campylobacter Spp. Isolated from conventional and antimicrobial-free swine production systems from different U.S. regions United States of America Observational 10986 10986 Production Type Production Type [at Finishing] ABF Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False 180 None 282 None None None None None 490 446 None None None None None
12030 12030 10332 None 13707 10.1089/fpd.2010.0665 Tadesse_2011_FooPatandDis Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Campylobacter Spp. Isolated from conventional and antimicrobial-free swine production systems from different U.S. regions United States of America Observational 10988 10988 Production Type Production Type [at Post-Chill] ABF Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False 8 None 11 None None None None None 12 17 None None None None None
12031 12031 10332 None 13707 10.1089/fpd.2010.0665 Tadesse_2011_FooPatandDis Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Campylobacter Spp. Isolated from conventional and antimicrobial-free swine production systems from different U.S. regions United States of America Observational 10986 10986 Production Type Production Type [at Finishing] ABF Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False 163 None 88 None None None None None 490 446 None None None None None
12032 12032 10332 None 13707 10.1089/fpd.2010.0665 Tadesse_2011_FooPatandDis Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Campylobacter Spp. Isolated from conventional and antimicrobial-free swine production systems from different U.S. regions United States of America Observational 10989 10989 Production Type Production Type [at Post-Chill] ABF Conventional Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 12 17 None None None None None
12033 12033 10332 None 13707 10.1089/fpd.2010.0665 Tadesse_2011_FooPatandDis Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Campylobacter Spp. Isolated from conventional and antimicrobial-free swine production systems from different U.S. regions United States of America Observational 10986 10986 Production Type Production Type [at Finishing] ABF Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False 40 None 14 None None None None None 490 446 None None None None None
12034 12034 10332 None 13707 10.1089/fpd.2010.0665 Tadesse_2011_FooPatandDis Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Campylobacter Spp. Isolated from conventional and antimicrobial-free swine production systems from different U.S. regions United States of America Observational 10989 10989 Production Type Production Type [at Post-Chill] ABF Conventional Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 12 17 None None None None None
12035 12035 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10341 10341 ABF Rearing Practice Here, ABF (antibiotic-free) is defined as no exposure post-weaning. Under the extensive ABF system, pigs have free access to the environment and are placed in barricaded fields - pigs in the intensive system are placed in confined barns with concrete slat Extensive (Roamed) Intensive (Confined) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 31 None None None None None 1 226 None None None None None
12036 12036 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10341 10341 ABF Rearing Practice Here, ABF (antibiotic-free) is defined as no exposure post-weaning. Under the extensive ABF system, pigs have free access to the environment and are placed in barricaded fields - pigs in the intensive system are placed in confined barns with concrete slat Extensive (Roamed) Intensive (Confined) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 1 226 None None None None None
12037 12037 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10341 10341 ABF Rearing Practice Here, ABF (antibiotic-free) is defined as no exposure post-weaning. Under the extensive ABF system, pigs have free access to the environment and are placed in barricaded fields - pigs in the intensive system are placed in confined barns with concrete slat Extensive (Roamed) Intensive (Confined) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 1 226 None None None None None
12038 12038 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10341 10341 ABF Rearing Practice Here, ABF (antibiotic-free) is defined as no exposure post-weaning. Under the extensive ABF system, pigs have free access to the environment and are placed in barricaded fields - pigs in the intensive system are placed in confined barns with concrete slat Extensive (Roamed) Intensive (Confined) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 1 226 None None None None None
12039 12039 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11141 11141 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones norfloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 0 None 77 None 0.00 None None None 165 167 None None None None None
12040 12040 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10341 10341 ABF Rearing Practice Here, ABF (antibiotic-free) is defined as no exposure post-weaning. Under the extensive ABF system, pigs have free access to the environment and are placed in barricaded fields - pigs in the intensive system are placed in confined barns with concrete slat Extensive (Roamed) Intensive (Confined) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 1 226 None None None None None
12045 12045 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 3 10 None None None None None
12046 12046 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10376 10376 Continuous CTC Use Period 2. Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 11 10 None None None None None
12047 12047 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 14 10 None None None None None
12048 12048 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 10 None None None None None
12049 12049 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.00 None 0.00 None 150 128 None None None None None
12050 12050 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10375 10375 Continuous CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 126 128 None None None None None
12051 12051 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.00 None 0.00 None 150 128 None None None None None
12052 12052 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 146 128 None None None None None
12053 12053 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 33.30 None 10.00 None 3 10 None None None None None
12054 12054 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10376 10376 Continuous CTC Use Period 2. Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 18.20 None 10.00 None 11 10 None None None None None
12055 12055 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 50.00 None 10.00 None 14 10 None None None None None
12056 12056 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 60.00 None 10.00 None 30 10 None None None None None
12057 12057 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 30.70 None 27.30 None 150 128 None None None None None
12058 12058 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10375 10375 Continuous CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 35.70 None 27.30 None 126 128 None None None None None
12059 12059 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 32.70 None 27.30 None 150 128 None None None None None
12060 12060 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 31.50 None 27.30 None 146 128 None None None None None
12061 12061 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 3 10 None None None None None
12062 12062 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10376 10376 Continuous CTC Use Period 2. Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 11 10 None None None None None
12063 12063 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 14 10 None None None None None
12064 12064 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 10 None None None None None
12065 12065 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 6.00 None 3.90 None 150 128 None None None None None
12066 12066 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10375 10375 Continuous CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 6.40 None 3.90 None 126 128 None None None None None
12067 12067 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.70 None 3.90 None 150 128 None None None None None
12068 12068 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 11.00 None 3.90 None 146 128 None None None None None
12069 12069 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.30 None 0.00 None 150 128 None None None None None
12070 12070 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10375 10375 Continuous CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 126 128 None None None None None
12071 12071 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.00 None 0.00 None 150 128 None None None None None
12072 12072 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 146 128 None None None None None
12073 12073 10069 None 11884 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01023.x Moro2000 Effects of heat stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10188 10188 Heat Stress Exposure to temperatures of 34 degrees celcius, at 65% humidity, for 24 hours. Measured via fecal sample. Stress Pre-stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Abattoir Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 30 None 5 None None None None None 100 100 None None None None None
12074 12074 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10955 10955 Production Type Predominantly C. coli (99.8%), sampled at farrowing, nursery, and finishing. Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides azithromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 27.70 None 25.30 None 903 1099 None None None 0.73 None
12075 12075 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10953 10953 Production Type Predominantly C. coli (98.3%). Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Other None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides azithromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 34.60 None 20.90 None 156 158 None None None 0.31 None
12076 12076 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10957 10957 Tiamulin Use Tiamulin Use (Finishers, C. coli) [35 g/ton]. Tiamulin use No Tiamulin Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides azithromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 90 None 24 None None None None None 369 52 None None None <0.01 None
12077 12077 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10955 10955 Production Type Predominantly C. coli (99.8%), sampled at farrowing, nursery, and finishing. Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 1.20 None 17.10 None 903 1099 None None None 0.11 None
12078 12078 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10954 10954 Production Type Predominantly C. coli (98.3%). Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 15.20 None 156 158 None None None <0.01 None
12079 12079 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10955 10955 Production Type Predominantly C. coli (99.8%), sampled at farrowing, nursery, and finishing. Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 27.50 None 25.20 None 903 1099 None None None 0.72 None
12080 12080 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10954 10954 Production Type Predominantly C. coli (98.3%). Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 34.00 None 20.90 None 156 158 None None None 0.31 None
12081 12081 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10957 10957 Tiamulin Use Tiamulin Use (Finishers, C. coli) [35 g/ton]. Tiamulin use No Tiamulin Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 89 None 24 None None None None None 369 52 None None None <0.01 None
12082 12082 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10955 10955 Production Type Predominantly C. coli (99.8%), sampled at farrowing, nursery, and finishing. Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 1.30 None 16.70 None 903 1099 None None None 0.11 None
12083 12083 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10954 10954 Production Type Predominantly C. coli (98.3%). Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 15.20 None 156 158 None None None <0.01 None
12084 12084 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10955 10955 Production Type Predominantly C. coli (99.8%), sampled at farrowing, nursery, and finishing. Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides telithromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 20.90 None 15.70 None 903 1099 None None None 0.81 None
12085 12085 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10954 10954 Production Type Predominantly C. coli (98.3%). Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides telithromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 26.30 None 7.00 None 156 158 None None None 0.18 None
12086 12086 10381 None 60001 Aksoy et al. (2005) Verotoxin production in strains of Escherichia coli isolated from cattle and sheep, and their resistance to antibiotics Turkey Observational 11088 11088 Sex Sex of cattle female male Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 17 None 12.70 None 14.50 None 63 117 None None None None None
12087 12087 10381 None 60001 Aksoy et al. (2005) Verotoxin production in strains of Escherichia coli isolated from cattle and sheep, and their resistance to antibiotics Turkey Observational 11087 11087 Age Age of cattle 0-2 yrs 3+ years Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 20 None 8.90 None 16.10 None 56 124 None None None None None
12088 12088 10381 None 60001 Aksoy et al. (2005) Verotoxin production in strains of Escherichia coli isolated from cattle and sheep, and their resistance to antibiotics Turkey Observational 11088 11088 Sex Sex of cattle female male Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 6 None 6.30 None 5.10 None 63 117 None None None None None
12089 12089 10381 None 60001 Aksoy et al. (2005) Verotoxin production in strains of Escherichia coli isolated from cattle and sheep, and their resistance to antibiotics Turkey Observational 11087 11087 Age Age of cattle 0-2 yrs 3+ years Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 10 None 0.00 None 8.10 None 56 124 None None None None None
12090 12090 10381 None 60001 Aksoy et al. (2005) Verotoxin production in strains of Escherichia coli isolated from cattle and sheep, and their resistance to antibiotics Turkey Observational 11088 11088 Sex Sex of cattle female male Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 4 None 9.50 None 3.40 None 63 117 None None None None None
12091 12091 10381 None 60001 Aksoy et al. (2005) Verotoxin production in strains of Escherichia coli isolated from cattle and sheep, and their resistance to antibiotics Turkey Observational 11087 11087 Age Age of cattle 0-2 yrs 3+ years Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 8 None 3.60 None 6.50 None 56 124 None None None None None
12092 12092 10267 None 8370 Checkley_2010_CanaVeteJour Associations between antimicrobial use and the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle in western Canada Canada None 10805 10805 Prophylactic Oxytetracycline Use (Terramycin-50 Premix fed at 110 g/kg, 14 day) Prophylactic Oxytetracycline Use (Terramycin-50 Premix fed at 110 g/kg, 14 day) Oxytetracycline Use No Oxytetracycline Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 14 None 10 None None None None None 84 94 None None None None None
12093 12093 10267 None 8370 Checkley_2010_CanaVeteJour Associations between antimicrobial use and the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle in western Canada Canada None 10804 10804 Metaphylactic Oxytetracycline Use (20 mg/kg Liquamycin LA-200, subcut) Metaphylactic Oxytetracycline Use (20 mg/kg Liquamycin LA-200, subcut) Oxytetracycline Use No Oxytetracycline Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 10 None None None None None 94 94 None None None None None
12094 12094 10146 None 8528 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-10-495 Cook2011 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichiae coli isolated from retail milk-fed veal meat from Southern Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10397 10397 Veal Type None Grain-fed Veal Milk-fed Veal Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.00 None 6.13 None 1258 392 None None None None None
12095 12095 10146 None 8528 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-10-495 Cook2011 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichiae coli isolated from retail milk-fed veal meat from Southern Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10397 10397 Veal Type None Grain-fed Veal Milk-fed Veal Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.40 None 2.80 None 1258 392 None None None None None
12096 12096 10146 None 8528 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-10-495 Cook2011 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichiae coli isolated from retail milk-fed veal meat from Southern Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10397 10397 Veal Type None Grain-fed Veal Milk-fed Veal Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.60 None 3.56 None 1258 392 None None None None None
12097 12097 10146 None 8528 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-10-495 Cook2011 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichiae coli isolated from retail milk-fed veal meat from Southern Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10397 10397 Veal Type None Grain-fed Veal Milk-fed Veal Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 3.80 None 1258 392 None None None None None
12098 12098 10146 None 8528 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-10-495 Cook2011 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichiae coli isolated from retail milk-fed veal meat from Southern Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10397 10397 Veal Type None Grain-fed Veal Milk-fed Veal Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 14.63 None 34.00 None 1258 392 None None None None None
12099 12099 10146 None 8528 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-10-495 Cook2011 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichiae coli isolated from retail milk-fed veal meat from Southern Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10397 10397 Veal Type None Grain-fed Veal Milk-fed Veal Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.43 None 5.09 None 1258 392 None None None None None
12100 12100 10146 None 8528 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-10-495 Cook2011 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichiae coli isolated from retail milk-fed veal meat from Southern Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10397 10397 Veal Type None Grain-fed Veal Milk-fed Veal Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.70 None 10.70 None 1258 392 None None None None None
12101 12101 10146 None 8528 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-10-495 Cook2011 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichiae coli isolated from retail milk-fed veal meat from Southern Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10397 10397 Veal Type None Grain-fed Veal Milk-fed Veal Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.70 None 12.00 None 1258 392 None None None None None
12102 12102 10172 None 9010 10.1089/fpd.2009.0417 Edrington2010 Influence of wet distiller's grains on prevalence of <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157:H7 and <i>Salmonella</> in feedlot cattle and antimicrobial susceptibility of generic <i>Escherichia coli<i> isolates United States of America None 10495 10495 Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Steam Flaked Corn Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Steam Flaked Corn Inclusion of WDG No WDG Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 18 18 None None None None None
12103 12103 10172 None 9010 10.1089/fpd.2009.0417 Edrington2010 Influence of wet distiller's grains on prevalence of <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157:H7 and <i>Salmonella</> in feedlot cattle and antimicrobial susceptibility of generic <i>Escherichia coli<i> isolates United States of America None 10494 10494 Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Dry Rolled Corn Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Dry Rolled Corn Inclusion of WDG No WDG Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 18 18 None None None None None
12104 12104 10036 None 11115 10.4315/0362-028x-67.7.1433 LeJeune2004 Microbiological quality of ground beef from conventionally-reared cattle and raised without antibiotics label claims United States of America Experimental 10082 10082 Production Type None ABF (Natural) Conventional Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 32.90 None 44.20 None 73 77 None None None 0.16 None
12105 12105 10036 None 11115 10.4315/0362-028x-67.7.1433 LeJeune2004 Microbiological quality of ground beef from conventionally-reared cattle and raised without antibiotics label claims United States of America Experimental 10082 10082 Production Type None ABF (Natural) Conventional Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 26.00 None 19.50 None 73 77 None None None 0.34 None
12106 12106 10036 None 11115 10.4315/0362-028x-67.7.1433 LeJeune2004 Microbiological quality of ground beef from conventionally-reared cattle and raised without antibiotics label claims United States of America Experimental 10082 10082 Production Type None ABF (Natural) Conventional Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.50 None 18.10 None 73 77 None None None 0.02 None
12107 12107 10036 None 11115 10.4315/0362-028x-67.7.1433 LeJeune2004 Microbiological quality of ground beef from conventionally-reared cattle and raised without antibiotics label claims United States of America Experimental 10082 10082 Production Type None ABF (Natural) Conventional Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.50 None 3.90 None 73 77 None None None 0.65 None
12108 12108 10036 None 11115 10.4315/0362-028x-67.7.1433 LeJeune2004 Microbiological quality of ground beef from conventionally-reared cattle and raised without antibiotics label claims United States of America Experimental 10082 10082 Production Type None ABF (Natural) Conventional Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 73 77 None None None N/A None
12109 12109 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10091 10091 CCFA 1 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a single dose (6.6 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Single Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 19.20 None 5.67 None 240 723 None None None None None
12110 12110 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10092 10092 CCFA 2/3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a two-thirds dose regimen (4.4 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Two-Thirds Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 32.10 None 5.67 None 240 723 None None None None None
12111 12111 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10093 10093 CCFA 3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a 3-dose regimen (6.6 mg/kg, SC, Day 0, 6, 13). CCFA Three Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 58.00 None 5.67 None 238 723 None None None None None
12112 12112 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10091 10091 CCFA 1 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a single dose (6.6 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Single Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 17.90 None 4.29 None 240 723 None None None None None
12113 12113 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10092 10092 CCFA 2/3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a two-thirds dose regimen (4.4 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Two-Thirds Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 30.40 None 4.29 None 240 723 None None None None None
12114 12114 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10093 10093 CCFA 3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a 3-dose regimen (6.6 mg/kg, SC, Day 0, 6, 13). CCFA Three Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 56.70 None 4.29 None 238 723 None None None None None
12115 12115 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10091 10091 CCFA 1 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a single dose (6.6 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Single Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 18.80 None 4.56 None 240 723 None None None None None
12116 12116 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10092 10092 CCFA 2/3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a two-thirds dose regimen (4.4 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Two-Thirds Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 31.70 None 4.56 None 240 723 None None None None None
12117 12117 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10093 10093 CCFA 3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a 3-dose regimen (6.6 mg/kg, SC, Day 0, 6, 13). CCFA Three Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 56.70 None 4.56 None 238 723 None None None None None
12118 12118 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10091 10091 CCFA 1 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a single dose (6.6 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Single Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.50 None 0.14 None 240 723 None None None None None
12119 12119 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10092 10092 CCFA 2/3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a two-thirds dose regimen (4.4 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Two-Thirds Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.14 None 240 723 None None None None None
12120 12120 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10093 10093 CCFA 3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a 3-dose regimen (6.6 mg/kg, SC, Day 0, 6, 13). CCFA Three Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.42 None 0.14 None 238 723 None None None None None
12121 12121 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10091 10091 CCFA 1 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a single dose (6.6 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Single Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.80 None 2.49 None 240 723 None None None None None
12122 12122 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10092 10092 CCFA 2/3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a two-thirds dose regimen (4.4 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Two-Thirds Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.17 None 2.49 None 240 723 None None None None None
12123 12123 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10093 10093 CCFA 3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a 3-dose regimen (6.6 mg/kg, SC, Day 0, 6, 13). CCFA Three Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.88 None 2.49 None 238 723 None None None None None
12124 12124 10084 None 12443 10.3168/jds.2014-8588 Pereira2014a Effect of preweaned dairy calf housing system on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli United States of America None 10232 10232 Housing System None Individual Pens (Non-acidified Milk) Group Pens (Acidified Milk) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 46.00 None 47.00 None 903 1057 None None None 0.4 None
12125 12125 10084 None 12443 10.3168/jds.2014-8588 Pereira2014a Effect of preweaned dairy calf housing system on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli United States of America None 10232 10232 Housing System None Individual Pens (Non-acidified Milk) Group Pens (Acidified Milk) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 33.00 None 27.00 None 903 1057 None None None 0.02 None
12126 12126 10084 None 12443 10.3168/jds.2014-8588 Pereira2014a Effect of preweaned dairy calf housing system on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli United States of America None 10232 10232 Housing System None Individual Pens (Non-acidified Milk) Group Pens (Acidified Milk) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.00 None 6.00 None 903 1057 None None None <0.0001 None
12127 12127 10084 None 12443 10.3168/jds.2014-8588 Pereira2014a Effect of preweaned dairy calf housing system on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli United States of America None 10232 10232 Housing System None Individual Pens (Non-acidified Milk) Group Pens (Acidified Milk) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.00 None 7.00 None 903 1057 None None None 0.001 None
12128 12128 10086 None 12445 10.1371/journal.pone.0115223 Pereira2014b In Vivo Selection of Resistant E. coli after Ingestion of Milk with Added Drug Residues United States of America None 10234 10234 Drug Residues in Milk Drug residues included ceftiofur, penicillin, ampicillin, and oxytetracycline at concentrations of 0.1, 0.005, 0.01, and 0.3 mg/ml, respectively. Milk fed with Drug Residues Milk fed without Drug Residues Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 76.00 None 39.00 None 270 270 None None None None None
12129 12129 10086 None 12445 10.1371/journal.pone.0115223 Pereira2014b In Vivo Selection of Resistant E. coli after Ingestion of Milk with Added Drug Residues United States of America None 10234 10234 Drug Residues in Milk Drug residues included ceftiofur, penicillin, ampicillin, and oxytetracycline at concentrations of 0.1, 0.005, 0.01, and 0.3 mg/ml, respectively. Milk fed with Drug Residues Milk fed without Drug Residues Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 72.00 None 35.00 None 270 270 None None None None None
12130 12130 10086 None 12445 10.1371/journal.pone.0115223 Pereira2014b In Vivo Selection of Resistant E. coli after Ingestion of Milk with Added Drug Residues United States of America None 10234 10234 Drug Residues in Milk Drug residues included ceftiofur, penicillin, ampicillin, and oxytetracycline at concentrations of 0.1, 0.005, 0.01, and 0.3 mg/ml, respectively. Milk fed with Drug Residues Milk fed without Drug Residues Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 48.00 None 23.00 None 270 270 None None None None None
12131 12131 10086 None 12445 10.1371/journal.pone.0115223 Pereira2014b In Vivo Selection of Resistant E. coli after Ingestion of Milk with Added Drug Residues United States of America None 10234 10234 Drug Residues in Milk Drug residues included ceftiofur, penicillin, ampicillin, and oxytetracycline at concentrations of 0.1, 0.005, 0.01, and 0.3 mg/ml, respectively. Milk fed with Drug Residues Milk fed without Drug Residues Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.00 None 1.00 None 270 270 None None None None None
12132 12132 10086 None 12445 10.1371/journal.pone.0115223 Pereira2014b In Vivo Selection of Resistant E. coli after Ingestion of Milk with Added Drug Residues United States of America None 10234 10234 Drug Residues in Milk Drug residues included ceftiofur, penicillin, ampicillin, and oxytetracycline at concentrations of 0.1, 0.005, 0.01, and 0.3 mg/ml, respectively. Milk fed with Drug Residues Milk fed without Drug Residues Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 1.00 None 270 270 None None None None None
12133 12133 10083 None 12442 10.3168/jds.2014-8521 Pereira2014 Effect of on-farm use of antimicrobial drugs on resistance in fecal Escherichia coli of preweaned dairy calves United States of America None 10231 10231 Enrofloxacin Use Use defined as one at least one treatment with enrofloxacin from birth to sampling. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 20.00 None 3.00 None 152 1271 None None None 0.005 None
12134 12134 10083 None 12442 10.3168/jds.2014-8521 Pereira2014 Effect of on-farm use of antimicrobial drugs on resistance in fecal Escherichia coli of preweaned dairy calves United States of America None 10230 10230 Ceftiofur Use Use defined as one at least one treatment with enrofloxacin from birth to sampling. Ceftiofur Use No Use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.00 None 5.00 None 144 1279 None None None 0.31 None
12135 12135 10083 None 12442 10.3168/jds.2014-8521 Pereira2014 Effect of on-farm use of antimicrobial drugs on resistance in fecal Escherichia coli of preweaned dairy calves United States of America None 10231 10231 Enrofloxacin Use Use defined as one at least one treatment with enrofloxacin from birth to sampling. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 27.00 None 4.00 None 152 1271 None None None <0.0001 None
12136 12136 10083 None 12442 10.3168/jds.2014-8521 Pereira2014 Effect of on-farm use of antimicrobial drugs on resistance in fecal Escherichia coli of preweaned dairy calves United States of America None 10230 10230 Ceftiofur Use Use defined as one at least one treatment with enrofloxacin from birth to sampling. Ceftiofur Use No Use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 6.00 None 6.00 None 144 1279 None None None 0.08 None
12137 12137 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11104 11104 Heifer-raiser Type Heifer-raiser Type Multi-source Heifer Raiser Single (Home) Farm Heifer Raiser Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 11.00 None 6.00 None 429 429 None None None 0.04 None
12138 12138 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11106 11106 Logistical Status at Heifer-raiser Logistical Status at Heifer-raiser Recent Arrival (< 2 mo.) to Heifer Raiser Approaching Departure from Heifer Raiser (2 - 3 mo.) Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 13.00 None 4.00 None 428 430 None None None 0.02 None
12139 12139 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11104 11104 Heifer-raiser Type Heifer-raiser Type Multi-source Heifer Raiser Single (Home) Farm Heifer Raiser Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.00 None 3.00 None 429 429 None None None 0.6 None
12140 12140 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11106 11106 Logistical Status at Heifer-raiser Logistical Status at Heifer-raiser Recent Arrival (< 2 mo.) to Heifer Raiser Approaching Departure from Heifer Raiser (2 - 3 mo.) Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.00 None 1.00 None 428 430 None None None 0.9 None
12141 12141 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11103 11103 Heifer-raiser Type None Multi-source Heifer Raiser Single (Home) Farm Heifer Raiser Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.00 None 0.50 None 429 429 None None None 0.5 None
12142 12142 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11105 11105 Logistical Status at Heifer-raiser None Recent Arrival (< 2 mo.) to Heifer Raiser Approaching Departure from Heifer Raiser (2 - 3 mo.) Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.00 None 0.50 None 428 430 None None None 0.5 None
12143 12143 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11103 11103 Heifer-raiser Type None Multi-source Heifer Raiser Single (Home) Farm Heifer Raiser Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.00 None 0.50 None 429 429 None None None 0.3 None
12144 12144 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11105 11105 Logistical Status at Heifer-raiser None Recent Arrival (< 2 mo.) to Heifer Raiser Approaching Departure from Heifer Raiser (2 - 3 mo.) Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.00 None 0.50 None 428 430 None None None 0.3 None
12145 12145 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11104 11104 Heifer-raiser Type Heifer-raiser Type Multi-source Heifer Raiser Single (Home) Farm Heifer Raiser Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.20 None 0.20 None 429 429 None None None 0.9 None
12146 12146 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11106 11106 Logistical Status at Heifer-raiser Logistical Status at Heifer-raiser Recent Arrival (< 2 mo.) to Heifer Raiser Approaching Departure from Heifer Raiser (2 - 3 mo.) Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.00 None 1.00 None 428 430 None None None 0.9 None
12147 12147 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11104 11104 Heifer-raiser Type Heifer-raiser Type Multi-source Heifer Raiser Single (Home) Farm Heifer Raiser Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.20 None 0.50 None 429 429 None None None 0.6 None
12148 12148 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11106 11106 Logistical Status at Heifer-raiser Logistical Status at Heifer-raiser Recent Arrival (< 2 mo.) to Heifer Raiser Approaching Departure from Heifer Raiser (2 - 3 mo.) Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.20 None 0.50 None 428 430 None None None 0.6 None
12149 12149 10091 None 12742 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-11-469 Rasschaert2012 Effect of farm type on within-herd Salmonella prevalence, serovar distribution, and antimicrobial resistance Belgium Observational 10249 10249 Farm Type Farm Type Open Farm (Grow-to-Finish) Closed Farm (Farrow-to-Finish) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 76 None 23 None None None None None 125 83 None None None None None
12150 12150 10234 None 7363 10.1128/AEM.00489-08 Alexander_2008_AppandEnvMic Effect of subtherapeutic administration of antibiotics on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli bacteria in feedlot cattle Canada None 10681 10681 Chlortetracycline and Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline and Sulfamethazine Use (44ppm fed as Aureo S-700) Chlortetracycline and Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 53 None 6 None None None None None 683 695 None None None None None
12151 12151 10234 None 7363 10.1128/AEM.00489-08 Alexander_2008_AppandEnvMic Effect of subtherapeutic administration of antibiotics on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli bacteria in feedlot cattle Canada None 10682 10682 Chlortetracycline Use Chlortetracycline Use (11ppm fed as Aureomycin-100 G) Chlortetracycline Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 6 None None None None None 670 695 None None None None None
12152 12152 10234 None 7363 10.1128/AEM.00489-08 Alexander_2008_AppandEnvMic Effect of subtherapeutic administration of antibiotics on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli bacteria in feedlot cattle Canada None 10683 10683 Monensin Use Monensin Use (25 ppm fed as Rumensin) Monensin Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 6 None None None None None 457 695 None None None None None
12153 12153 10234 None 7363 10.1128/AEM.00489-08 Alexander_2008_AppandEnvMic Effect of subtherapeutic administration of antibiotics on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli bacteria in feedlot cattle Canada None 10685 10685 Tylosin Phosphate Use Tylosin Phosphate Use (11ppm, fed as Tylan) Tylosin Phosphate Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 7 None 6 None None None None None 552 695 None None None None None
12154 12154 10234 None 7363 10.1128/AEM.00489-08 Alexander_2008_AppandEnvMic Effect of subtherapeutic administration of antibiotics on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli bacteria in feedlot cattle Canada None 10687 10687 Virginiamycin Use Virginiamycin Use (31 ppm fed as V-max) Virginiamycin Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 6 None None None None None 455 695 None None None None None
12155 12155 10068 None 11881 10.1089/fpd.2010.0632 Morley2011 Effects of Restricted Antimicrobial Exposure on Antimicrobial Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli from Feedlot Cattle United States of America None 10186 10186 Production Type None Natural (ABF) Conventional Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 8 4161 7 4706 None None None None 4169 4713 None None None None None
12156 12156 10068 None 11881 10.1089/fpd.2010.0632 Morley2011 Effects of Restricted Antimicrobial Exposure on Antimicrobial Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli from Feedlot Cattle United States of America None 10186 10186 Production Type None Natural (ABF) Conventional Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 69 4100 104 4609 None None None None 4169 4713 None None None None None
12157 12157 10068 None 11881 10.1089/fpd.2010.0632 Morley2011 Effects of Restricted Antimicrobial Exposure on Antimicrobial Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli from Feedlot Cattle United States of America None 10186 10186 Production Type None Natural (ABF) Conventional Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 7 4162 13 4700 None None None None 4169 4713 None None None None None
12158 12158 10068 None 11881 10.1089/fpd.2010.0632 Morley2011 Effects of Restricted Antimicrobial Exposure on Antimicrobial Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli from Feedlot Cattle United States of America None 10186 10186 Production Type None Natural (ABF) Conventional Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False 199 3970 231 4482 None None None None 4169 4713 None None None None None
12159 12159 10068 None 11881 10.1089/fpd.2010.0632 Morley2011 Effects of Restricted Antimicrobial Exposure on Antimicrobial Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli from Feedlot Cattle United States of America None 10186 10186 Production Type None Natural (ABF) Conventional Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 6 4163 7 4706 None None None None 4169 4713 None None None None None
12160 12160 10068 None 11881 10.1089/fpd.2010.0632 Morley2011 Effects of Restricted Antimicrobial Exposure on Antimicrobial Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli from Feedlot Cattle United States of America None 10186 10186 Production Type None Natural (ABF) Conventional Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 31 4138 42 4671 None None None None 4169 4713 None None None None None
12162 12162 10235 None 7365 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.008 Alexander_2010_InJoofFoMi Farm-to-fork characterization of Escherichia coli associated with feedlot cattle with a known history of antimicrobial use Canada None 10688 10688 Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline sulfamethazine, administered in water, as Aureo S-700 (AS700), at 44 ppm. Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 1 None None None None None 14 18 None None None None None
12163 12163 10235 None 7365 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.008 Alexander_2010_InJoofFoMi Farm-to-fork characterization of Escherichia coli associated with feedlot cattle with a known history of antimicrobial use Canada None 10688 10688 Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline sulfamethazine, administered in water, as Aureo S-700 (AS700), at 44 ppm. Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 4 None None None None None 14 18 None None None None None
12164 12164 10395 None 60005 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Carson et al. (2008) Antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli from 29 beef farms in Ontario Canada Observational 11089 11089 Production Stage None Feedlot Beef Operation Cow-Calf Operation Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.20 None 0.10 None 993 807 None None None None None
12165 12165 10395 None 60005 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Carson et al. (2008) Antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli from 29 beef farms in Ontario Canada Observational 11089 11089 Production Stage None Feedlot Beef Operation Cow-Calf Operation Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.70 None 0.00 None 993 807 None None None None None
12166 12166 10395 None 60005 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Carson et al. (2008) Antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli from 29 beef farms in Ontario Canada Observational 11089 11089 Production Stage None Feedlot Beef Operation Cow-Calf Operation Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 993 807 None None None None None
12167 12167 10395 None 60005 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Carson et al. (2008) Antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli from 29 beef farms in Ontario Canada Observational 11089 11089 Production Stage None Feedlot Beef Operation Cow-Calf Operation Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.00 None 3.40 None 993 807 None None None None None
12168 12168 10395 None 60005 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Carson et al. (2008) Antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli from 29 beef farms in Ontario Canada Observational 11089 11089 Production Stage None Feedlot Beef Operation Cow-Calf Operation Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.90 None 0.10 None 993 807 None None None None None
12169 12169 10395 None 60005 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Carson et al. (2008) Antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli from 29 beef farms in Ontario Canada Observational 11089 11089 Production Stage None Feedlot Beef Operation Cow-Calf Operation Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 6.10 None 2.10 None 993 807 None None None None None
12170 12170 10395 None 60005 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Carson et al. (2008) Antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli from 29 beef farms in Ontario Canada Observational 11089 11089 Production Stage None Feedlot Beef Operation Cow-Calf Operation Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 993 807 None None None None None
12171 12171 10327 None 13084 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.005 Sapkota_2014_ScofthToEn Lower prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella on large-scale U.S. conventional poultry farms that transitioned to organic practices United States of America None 10982 10982 Production Type Data for Salmonella Kentucky Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 2 None 4 None None None None None 32 9 None None None None None
12172 12172 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11107 11107 Chilling Method None Air Chilling Immersion Chilling Chicken Carcass None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 0.00 None 8.30 None 59 73 None None None None None
12173 12173 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11107 11107 Chilling Method None Air Chilling Immersion Chilling Chicken Carcass None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones grepafloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 9.10 None 41.70 None 59 73 None None None None None
12174 12174 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11107 11107 Chilling Method None Air Chilling Immersion Chilling Chicken Carcass None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones levofloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 18.20 None 41.70 None 59 73 None None None None None
12175 12175 10381 None 60001 Aksoy et al. (2005) Verotoxin production in strains of Escherichia coli isolated from cattle and sheep, and their resistance to antibiotics Turkey Observational 11087 11087 Age Age of cattle 0-2 yrs 3+ years Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 36 None None None None None 56 124 None None None None None
12176 12176 10381 None 60001 Aksoy et al. (2005) Verotoxin production in strains of Escherichia coli isolated from cattle and sheep, and their resistance to antibiotics Turkey Observational 11087 11087 Age Age of cattle 0-2 yrs 3+ years Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 7 None None None None None 56 124 None None None None None
12177 12177 10381 None 60001 Aksoy et al. (2005) Verotoxin production in strains of Escherichia coli isolated from cattle and sheep, and their resistance to antibiotics Turkey Observational 11087 11087 Age Age of cattle 0-2 yrs 3+ years Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 6 None None None None None 56 124 None None None None None
12178 12178 10381 None 60001 Aksoy et al. (2005) Verotoxin production in strains of Escherichia coli isolated from cattle and sheep, and their resistance to antibiotics Turkey Observational 11088 11088 Sex Sex of cattle female male Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 26 None 25 None None None None None 63 117 None None None None None
12179 12179 10381 None 60001 Aksoy et al. (2005) Verotoxin production in strains of Escherichia coli isolated from cattle and sheep, and their resistance to antibiotics Turkey Observational 11088 11088 Sex Sex of cattle female male Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 5 None None None None None 63 117 None None None None None
12180 12180 10381 None 60001 Aksoy et al. (2005) Verotoxin production in strains of Escherichia coli isolated from cattle and sheep, and their resistance to antibiotics Turkey Observational 11088 11088 Sex Sex of cattle female male Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 6 None None None None None 63 117 None None None None None
12181 12181 10232 None 7342 10.1089/fpd.2010.0566 Alali_2010_FooPatandDis Prevalence and distribution of Salmonella in organic and conventional broiler poultry farms United States of America None 10679 10679 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False 5 None 32 None None None None None 12 58 None None None 0.528 None
12182 12182 10232 None 7342 10.1089/fpd.2010.0566 Alali_2010_FooPatandDis Prevalence and distribution of Salmonella in organic and conventional broiler poultry farms United States of America None 10679 10679 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 6 None 33 None None None None None 12 58 None None None 0.754 None
12183 12183 10232 None 7342 10.1089/fpd.2010.0566 Alali_2010_FooPatandDis Prevalence and distribution of Salmonella in organic and conventional broiler poultry farms United States of America None 10679 10679 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella spp. False None False 5 None 33 None None None None None 12 58 None None None 0.361 None
12184 12184 10232 None 7342 10.1089/fpd.2010.0566 Alali_2010_FooPatandDis Prevalence and distribution of Salmonella in organic and conventional broiler poultry farms United States of America None 10679 10679 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 32 None None None None None 12 58 None None None 0.004 None
12185 12185 10232 None 7342 10.1089/fpd.2010.0566 Alali_2010_FooPatandDis Prevalence and distribution of Salmonella in organic and conventional broiler poultry farms United States of America None 10679 10679 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False 2 None 1 None None None None None 12 58 None None None 0.074 None
12186 12186 10232 None 7342 10.1089/fpd.2010.0566 Alali_2010_FooPatandDis Prevalence and distribution of Salmonella in organic and conventional broiler poultry farms United States of America None 10679 10679 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 12 58 None None None 0.316 None
12187 12187 10232 None 7342 10.1089/fpd.2010.0566 Alali_2010_FooPatandDis Prevalence and distribution of Salmonella in organic and conventional broiler poultry farms United States of America None 10679 10679 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 7 None 53 None None None None None 12 58 None None None 0.01 None
12188 12188 10232 None 7342 10.1089/fpd.2010.0566 Alali_2010_FooPatandDis Prevalence and distribution of Salmonella in organic and conventional broiler poultry farms United States of America None 10679 10679 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 3 None None None None None 12 58 None None None 0.014 None
12189 12189 10258 None 8181 10.1089/mdr.2014.0037 Callens_2015_MicrDrugResi Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring Belgium None 10783 10783 Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use in Parent Sow Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use No Use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 80.00 None 48.10 None 30 264 None None None <0.0001 None
12190 12190 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10955 10955 Production Type Predominantly C. coli (99.8%), sampled at farrowing, nursery, and finishing. Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 0.10 None 0.00 None 903 1099 None None None 0.27 None
12191 12191 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10954 10954 Production Type Predominantly C. coli (98.3%). Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 156 158 None None None NR None
12192 12192 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10955 10955 Production Type Predominantly C. coli (99.8%), sampled at farrowing, nursery, and finishing. Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols florfenicol None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 903 1099 None None None NR None
12193 12193 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10954 10954 Production Type Predominantly C. coli (98.3%). Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols florfenicol None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 156 158 None None None NR None
12194 12194 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10955 10955 Production Type Predominantly C. coli (99.8%), sampled at farrowing, nursery, and finishing. Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Lincosamides clindamycin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 12.50 None 3.50 None 903 1099 None None None 0.04 None
12195 12195 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10954 10954 Production Type Predominantly C. coli (98.3%). Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Lincosamides clindamycin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 10.30 None 0.60 None 156 158 None None None 0.48 None
12196 12196 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10753 10753 Farm size Farm size 450-750 veal calves <450 veal calves Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 17 None 5 None None None None None None None 2.70 0.80 9.10 None None
12197 12197 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10752 10752 Farm size Farm size >750 veal calves <450 veal calves Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 26 None 5 None None None None None None None 3.10 1.00 9.70 None None
12198 12198 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10753 10753 Farm size Farm size 450-750 veal calves <450 veal calves Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 17 None 5 None None None None None None None 0.20 0.05 0.60 None None
12199 12199 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10752 10752 Farm size Farm size >750 veal calves <450 veal calves Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 26 None 5 None None None None None None None 0.20 0.05 0.60 None None
12200 12200 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10753 10753 Farm size Farm size 450-750 veal calves <450 veal calves Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 17 None 5 None None None None None None None 0.80 0.20 2.80 None None
12201 12201 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10752 10752 Farm size Farm size >750 veal calves <450 veal calves Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 26 None 5 None None None None None None None 1.10 0.30 3.80 None None
12202 12202 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10756 10756 Number of calves per pen Number of calves per pen > or equal to 20 calves per pen <20 calves per pen Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 42 None None None None None None None 0.40 0.20 1.00 None None
12203 12203 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10756 10756 Number of calves per pen Number of calves per pen > or equal to 20 calves per pen <20 calves per pen Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 42 None None None None None None None 1.40 0.60 3.70 None None
12204 12204 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10756 10756 Number of calves per pen Number of calves per pen > or equal to 20 calves per pen <20 calves per pen Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 42 None None None None None None None 1.70 0.70 4.40 None None
12205 12205 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10754 10754 Feeding roughage Feeding roughage after first week of production cycle from start production cycle Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 22 None 26 None None None None None None None 0.90 0.50 1.60 None None
12206 12206 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10754 10754 Feeding roughage Feeding roughage after first week of production cycle from start production cycle Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 22 None 26 None None None None None None None 0.80 0.40 1.40 None None
12207 12207 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10754 10754 Feeding roughage Feeding roughage after first week of production cycle from start production cycle Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 22 None 26 None None None None None None None 1.00 0.50 2.00 None None
12208 12208 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10757 10757 Pest control of flies Pest control of flies Active pest control of flies No pest control of flies Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 37 None 11 None None None None None None None 1.40 0.60 3.20 None None
12209 12209 10077 None 12132 10.1080/00480169.2008.36801 Nulsen2008 Antibiotic resistance among indicator bacteria isolated from healthy pigs in New Zealand New Zealand Experimental 10214 10214 Antimicrobial Use Policy Antimicrobial Use Policy AMU for Metaphylaxis and Treatment AMU for Treatment Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 75 None 21 None None None None None 103 54 None None None None None
12210 12210 10077 None 12132 10.1080/00480169.2008.36801 Nulsen2008 Antibiotic resistance among indicator bacteria isolated from healthy pigs in New Zealand New Zealand Experimental 10214 10214 Antimicrobial Use Policy Antimicrobial Use Policy AMU for Metaphylaxis and Treatment AMU for Treatment Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 1 None None None None None 103 54 None None None None None
12211 12211 10077 None 12132 10.1080/00480169.2008.36801 Nulsen2008 Antibiotic resistance among indicator bacteria isolated from healthy pigs in New Zealand New Zealand Experimental 10219 10219 Production Type Production Type Organic (ABF) Conventional (AMU for Treatment Only) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 21 None 4.00 None 39.00 None 47 54 None None None None None
12212 12212 10077 None 12132 10.1080/00480169.2008.36801 Nulsen2008 Antibiotic resistance among indicator bacteria isolated from healthy pigs in New Zealand New Zealand Experimental 10219 10219 Production Type Production Type Organic (ABF) Conventional (AMU for Treatment Only) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 46 1 47 0.00 None 2.00 None 47 54 None None None None None
12213 12213 10077 None 12132 10.1080/00480169.2008.36801 Nulsen2008 Antibiotic resistance among indicator bacteria isolated from healthy pigs in New Zealand New Zealand Experimental 10217 10217 Production Type Production Type Conventional (AMU for Metaphylaxis and Treatment) Organic (ABF) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 75 28 2 45 None None None None 103 47 None None None None None
12214 12214 10077 None 12132 10.1080/00480169.2008.36801 Nulsen2008 Antibiotic resistance among indicator bacteria isolated from healthy pigs in New Zealand New Zealand Experimental 10217 10217 Production Type Production Type Conventional (AMU for Metaphylaxis and Treatment) Organic (ABF) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 5 98 0 47 None None None None 103 47 None None None None None
12215 12215 20018 None 12919 10.4315/0362-028x-72.3.482 Rosengren2009 Associations between antimicrobial exposure and resistance in fecal Campylobacter spp. from grow-finish pigs on-farrn in alberta and saskatchewan, Canada Canada Observational 11249 11249 Beta-lactam Use Beta-lactam use in grower-finishers for the past 12 months. No level of use provided. No Beta-lactam Use Beta-lactam Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Unclear None None None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None None None None None None None 8.90 1.30 61.90 0.03 None
12216 12216 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10757 10757 Pest control of flies Pest control of flies Active pest control of flies No pest control of flies Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 37 None 11 None None None None None None None 0.70 0.30 1.70 None None
12217 12217 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10757 10757 Pest control of flies Pest control of flies Active pest control of flies No pest control of flies Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 37 None 11 None None None None None None None 1.40 0.60 3.20 None None
12218 12218 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10755 10755 Frequency of changing work clothes Frequency of changing work clothes Farmer changes work clothes 2−4 times per week Farmer wears clean work clothes every day Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 38 None 10 None None None None None None None 1.70 0.80 3.50 None None
12219 12219 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10755 10755 Frequency of changing work clothes Frequency of changing work clothes Farmer changes work clothes 2−4 times per week Farmer wears clean work clothes every day Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 38 None 10 None None None None None None None 2.60 1.20 5.70 None None
12220 12220 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10755 10755 Frequency of changing work clothes Frequency of changing work clothes Farmer changes work clothes 2−4 times per week Farmer wears clean work clothes every day Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 38 None 10 None None None None None None None 2.40 1.10 5.20 None None
12221 12221 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10744 10744 Administration of aminoglycosides (neomycin and gentamycin) Administration of aminoglycosides (neomycin and gentamycin) Administration No Administration Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 27 None 21 None None None None None None None 1.60 0.70 3.40 None None
12222 12222 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10744 10744 Administration of aminoglycosides (neomycin and gentamycin) Administration of aminoglycosides (neomycin and gentamycin) Administration No Administration Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 27 None 21 None None None None None None None 1.40 0.60 3.20 None None
12223 12223 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10744 10744 Administration of aminoglycosides (neomycin and gentamycin) Administration of aminoglycosides (neomycin and gentamycin) Administration No Administration Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 27 None 21 None None None None None None None 0.50 0.20 1.10 None None
12224 12224 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10745 10745 Administration of cephalosporins (Cefquinome, ceftiofur) Administration of cephalosporins (Cefquinome, ceftiofur) Administration No administration Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 31 None 17 None None None None None None None 0.30 0.10 0.60 <0.001 None
12225 12225 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10745 10745 Administration of cephalosporins (Cefquinome, ceftiofur) Administration of cephalosporins (Cefquinome, ceftiofur) Administration No administration Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 31 None 17 None None None None None None None 1.10 0.50 2.40 None None
12226 12226 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10745 10745 Administration of cephalosporins (Cefquinome, ceftiofur) Administration of cephalosporins (Cefquinome, ceftiofur) Administration No administration Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 31 None 17 None None None None None None None 0.30 0.10 0.70 None None
12227 12227 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10748 10748 Administration of quinolones (Enrofloxacin, flumequine, danofloxacin, difloxacin, marbofloxacin) Administration of quinolones (Enrofloxacin, flumequine, danofloxacin, difloxacin, marbofloxacin) Administration of greater tha or equal to 0.3 ADD/pc Administration of <0.3 ADD/pc (animal daily dosage per production cycle) Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 23 None 25 None None None None None None None 0.50 0.30 0.80 None None
40210 40210 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11324 11324 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
12228 12228 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10748 10748 Administration of quinolones (Enrofloxacin, flumequine, danofloxacin, difloxacin, marbofloxacin) Administration of quinolones (Enrofloxacin, flumequine, danofloxacin, difloxacin, marbofloxacin) Administration of greater tha or equal to 0.3 ADD/pc Administration of <0.3 ADD/pc (animal daily dosage per production cycle) Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 23 None 25 None None None None None None None 2.80 1.60 4.70 None None
12229 12229 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10748 10748 Administration of quinolones (Enrofloxacin, flumequine, danofloxacin, difloxacin, marbofloxacin) Administration of quinolones (Enrofloxacin, flumequine, danofloxacin, difloxacin, marbofloxacin) Administration of greater tha or equal to 0.3 ADD/pc Administration of <0.3 ADD/pc (animal daily dosage per production cycle) Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 23 None 25 None None None None None None None 0.90 0.60 1.60 None None
12230 12230 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10747 10747 Administration of penicillins (Ampicillin, amoxicillin, ampicillin-cloxacillin, benzylpenicillin) Administration of penicillins (Ampicillin, amoxicillin, ampicillin-cloxacillin, benzylpenicillin) Administration of >0.3 ADD/pc Administration of <1.3 ADD/pc Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 25 None 23 None None None None None None None 1.40 0.70 3.00 None None
12231 12231 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10747 10747 Administration of penicillins (Ampicillin, amoxicillin, ampicillin-cloxacillin, benzylpenicillin) Administration of penicillins (Ampicillin, amoxicillin, ampicillin-cloxacillin, benzylpenicillin) Administration of >0.3 ADD/pc Administration of <1.3 ADD/pc Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 25 None 23 None None None None None None None 3.30 1.50 7.30 None None
12232 12232 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10747 10747 Administration of penicillins (Ampicillin, amoxicillin, ampicillin-cloxacillin, benzylpenicillin) Administration of penicillins (Ampicillin, amoxicillin, ampicillin-cloxacillin, benzylpenicillin) Administration of >0.3 ADD/pc Administration of <1.3 ADD/pc Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 25 None 23 None None None None None None None 3.40 1.50 7.60 None None
12233 12233 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10751 10751 Administration of Trimethoprim-sulfonamide combinations (Trimethoprim-sulfadiazine, trimethoprim-sulfadoxine) Administration of Trimethoprim-sulfonamide combinations (Trimethoprim-sulfadiazine, trimethoprim-sulfadoxine) Administration of trimethoprim/sulfonamide combinations No administration Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 30 None 18 None None None None None None None 3.10 1.70 5.80 None None
12234 12234 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10751 10751 Administration of Trimethoprim-sulfonamide combinations (Trimethoprim-sulfadiazine, trimethoprim-sulfadoxine) Administration of Trimethoprim-sulfonamide combinations (Trimethoprim-sulfadiazine, trimethoprim-sulfadoxine) Administration of trimethoprim/sulfonamide combinations No administration Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 30 None 18 None None None None None None None 1.60 0.80 3.00 None None
12235 12235 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10751 10751 Administration of Trimethoprim-sulfonamide combinations (Trimethoprim-sulfadiazine, trimethoprim-sulfadoxine) Administration of Trimethoprim-sulfonamide combinations (Trimethoprim-sulfadiazine, trimethoprim-sulfadoxine) Administration of trimethoprim/sulfonamide combinations No administration Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 30 None 18 None None None None None None None 2.60 1.40 5.00 None None
12236 12236 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10750 10750 Administration of tetracyclines (Doxycycline, oxytetracycline) Administration of tetracyclines (Doxycycline, oxytetracycline) Administration of 20−40 ADD/pc Administration of <20 ADD/pc Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 24 None 21 None None None None None None None 0.50 0.30 1.00 None None
12237 12237 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10750 10750 Administration of tetracyclines (Doxycycline, oxytetracycline) Administration of tetracyclines (Doxycycline, oxytetracycline) Administration of 20−40 ADD/pc Administration of <20 ADD/pc Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 24 None 21 None None None None None None None 0.50 0.20 0.90 None None
12238 12238 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10750 10750 Administration of tetracyclines (Doxycycline, oxytetracycline) Administration of tetracyclines (Doxycycline, oxytetracycline) Administration of 20−40 ADD/pc Administration of <20 ADD/pc Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 24 None 21 None None None None None None None 3.20 1.70 6.10 None None
12239 12239 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10749 10749 Administration of tetracyclines (Doxycycline, oxytetracycline) Administration of tetracyclines (Doxycycline, oxytetracycline) Administration of >40 ADD/pc Administration of <20 ADD/pc Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 24 None 3 None None None None None None None 6.50 1.70 25.20 None None
12240 12240 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10749 10749 Administration of tetracyclines (Doxycycline, oxytetracycline) Administration of tetracyclines (Doxycycline, oxytetracycline) Administration of >40 ADD/pc Administration of <20 ADD/pc Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 24 None 3 None None None None None None None 0.20 0.10 0.90 None None
12241 12241 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10749 10749 Administration of tetracyclines (Doxycycline, oxytetracycline) Administration of tetracyclines (Doxycycline, oxytetracycline) Administration of >40 ADD/pc Administration of <20 ADD/pc Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 24 None 3 None None None None None None None 13.10 2.80 62.80 None None
12242 12242 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10746 10746 Administration of colistin Administration of colistin Administration of >9.1 ADD/pc Administration of <9.1 ADD/pc Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 25 None 23 None None None None None None None 1.10 0.50 2.10 None None
12243 12243 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10746 10746 Administration of colistin Administration of colistin Administration of >9.1 ADD/pc Administration of <9.1 ADD/pc Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 25 None 23 None None None None None None None 1.80 0.90 3.70 None None
12244 12244 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10746 10746 Administration of colistin Administration of colistin Administration of >9.1 ADD/pc Administration of <9.1 ADD/pc Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 25 None 23 None None None None None None None 0.90 0.40 1.80 None None
12245 12245 10306 None 10968 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01071.x Di.Labio_2007_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from Swiss veal calves at slaughter Switzerland None 10919 10919 Participation in quality assurance programme None Participation in quality assurance programme No participation Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Farm Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None 27 73 0.21 0.08 0.54 0.001 None
12246 12246 10306 None 10968 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01071.x Di.Labio_2007_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from Swiss veal calves at slaughter Switzerland None 10919 10919 Participation in quality assurance programme None Participation in quality assurance programme No participation Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Farm Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None 27 73 0.11 0.03 0.35 <0.001 None
12247 12247 10306 None 10968 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01071.x Di.Labio_2007_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from Swiss veal calves at slaughter Switzerland None 10919 10919 Participation in quality assurance programme None Participation in quality assurance programme No participation Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Farm Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None 27 73 0.13 0.05 0.38 <0.001 None
12248 12248 10306 None 10968 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01071.x Di.Labio_2007_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from Swiss veal calves at slaughter Switzerland None 10919 10919 Participation in quality assurance programme None Participation in quality assurance programme No participation Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Farm Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None 27 73 0.15 0.05 0.50 0.002 None
12249 12249 10306 None 10968 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01071.x Di.Labio_2007_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from Swiss veal calves at slaughter Switzerland None 10919 10919 Participation in quality assurance programme None Participation in quality assurance programme No participation Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Farm Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None 27 73 0.15 0.05 0.48 0.001 None
12250 12250 10306 None 10968 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01071.x Di.Labio_2007_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from Swiss veal calves at slaughter Switzerland None 10914 10914 Calves Purchased from External Supplier None Yes No Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Farm Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None 94 6 26.17 2.36 290.34 0.008 None
12251 12251 10306 None 10968 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01071.x Di.Labio_2007_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from Swiss veal calves at slaughter Switzerland None 10914 10914 Calves Purchased from External Supplier None Yes No Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Farm Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None 94 6 29.69 2.70 325.89 0.006 None
12252 12252 10306 None 10968 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01071.x Di.Labio_2007_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from Swiss veal calves at slaughter Switzerland None 10917 10917 Number of Calf Suppliers None >20 calf suppliers <20 calf suppliers Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Farm Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None 47 53 0.22 0.09 0.52 0.006 None
12253 12253 10306 None 10968 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01071.x Di.Labio_2007_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from Swiss veal calves at slaughter Switzerland None 10917 10917 Number of Calf Suppliers None >20 calf suppliers <20 calf suppliers Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Farm Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None 47 53 0.26 0.11 0.62 0.002 None
12254 12254 10065 None 11825 10.1089/fpd.2014.1808 Mollenkopf2014 Organic or antibiotic-free labeling does not impact the recovery of enteric pathogens and antimicrobial-resistant escherichia coli from fresh retail chicken United States of America None 10182 10182 Vacuum Packaging Measured as presence of CTX-M gene, following selective isolation. Vacuum Packaged Not Vacuum Packaged Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat None See gene column CTX-M (family) Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 12 None None None None None 39 192 None None None None None
12255 12255 10306 None 10968 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01071.x Di.Labio_2007_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from Swiss veal calves at slaughter Switzerland None 10917 10917 Number of Calf Suppliers None >20 calf suppliers <20 calf suppliers Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Farm Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None 47 53 0.23 0.08 0.68 0.008 None
12256 12256 10065 None 11825 10.1089/fpd.2014.1808 Mollenkopf2014 Organic or antibiotic-free labeling does not impact the recovery of enteric pathogens and antimicrobial-resistant escherichia coli from fresh retail chicken United States of America None 10181 10181 Vacuum Packaging Measured as presence of CMY-2 gene, following selective isolation. Vacuum Packaged Not Vacuum Packaged Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat None See gene column CMY-2 Escherichia coli False None False 23 None 101 None None None None None 39 192 None None None None None
12257 12257 10306 None 10968 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01071.x Di.Labio_2007_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from Swiss veal calves at slaughter Switzerland None 10917 10917 Number of Calf Suppliers None >20 calf suppliers <20 calf suppliers Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Farm Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None 47 53 0.34 0.13 0.86 0.0024 None
12258 12258 10306 None 10968 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01071.x Di.Labio_2007_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from Swiss veal calves at slaughter Switzerland None 10917 10917 Number of Calf Suppliers None >20 calf suppliers <20 calf suppliers Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Farm Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None 47 53 0.27 0.10 0.74 0.011 None
12259 12259 10306 None 10968 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01071.x Di.Labio_2007_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from Swiss veal calves at slaughter Switzerland None 10917 10917 Number of Calf Suppliers None >20 calf suppliers <20 calf suppliers Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Farm Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None 47 53 0.18 0.06 0.54 0.002 None
12260 12260 10232 None 7342 10.1089/fpd.2010.0566 Alali_2010_FooPatandDis Prevalence and distribution of Salmonella in organic and conventional broiler poultry farms United States of America None 10679 10679 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 12 58 None None None None None
12261 12261 10306 None 10968 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01071.x Di.Labio_2007_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from Swiss veal calves at slaughter Switzerland None 10921 10921 Tulathromycin Use Tulathromycin Use (as Draxxin, injection, at arrival on farm) Tulathromycin Use No Tulathromycin Use Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Farm Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None 28 67 0.32 0.10 0.98 0.046 None
12262 12262 10306 None 10968 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01071.x Di.Labio_2007_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from Swiss veal calves at slaughter Switzerland None 10918 10918 Outdoor Access for Calves Primarily C. jejuni (63.9%). Outdoor access No outdoor access Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Farm Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None None None None None 10 90 12.17 1.45 102.32 0.021 None
12263 12263 10306 None 10968 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01071.x Di.Labio_2007_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from Swiss veal calves at slaughter Switzerland None 10916 10916 Medicated Feed upon Arrival None Medicated Feed Provided Non-Medicated Feed Provided Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Farm Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None 54 41 10.23 1.26 82.89 0.029 None
12264 12264 10306 None 10968 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01071.x Di.Labio_2007_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from Swiss veal calves at slaughter Switzerland None 10920 10920 Size of Finishing Group Primarily C. jejuni (63.9%). >26 calves per group <26 calves per group Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None None None None None 50 50 4.70 1.62 13.58 0.004 None
12265 12265 10306 None 10968 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2007.01071.x Di.Labio_2007_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from Swiss veal calves at slaughter Switzerland None 10915 10915 Feeding of Milk by-products Primarily C. jejuni (63.9%). Feeding of Milk by-products No Feeding of Milk by-products Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None None None None None 49 51 2.73 1.05 7.09 0.04 None
12282 12282 10031 None 11058 10.1186/1471-2458-3-39 Ledergerber2003 Risk factors for antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter spp. isolated from raw poultry meat in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10075 10075 Sale Location of Retail Product Sale Location of Retail Product Sold in Open Displays Sold Pre-packaged Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Odds Ratio Retail Meat Penicillins amoxicillin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None None None None None 107 308 11.20 1.20 106.30 0.03 None
12283 12283 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10163 10163 Chlortetracyline Use Chlortetracyline, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as Aureomycin 100-g at 11 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 4 μg/ml TET-HCL. Chlortetracyline Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 7 None 2.70 None 6.30 None 74 111 None None None None None
12284 12284 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10161 10161 Chlortetracycline and Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as Aureo S-700G at 44 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 4 μg/ml TET-HCL. Chlortetracycline + sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 20 None 7 None 18.70 None 6.30 None 107 111 None None None None None
12285 12285 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10165 10165 Virginiamycin Use Virginiamycin, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as V-Maxed at 31 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 4 μg/ml TET-HCL. Virginiamycin Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 7 None 13.00 None 6.30 None 69 111 None None None None None
12286 12286 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10163 10163 Chlortetracyline Use Chlortetracyline, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as Aureomycin 100-g at 11 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 4 μg/ml TET-HCL. Chlortetracyline Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 26 None 58 None 35.10 None 52.30 None 74 111 None None None None None
12287 12287 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10161 10161 Chlortetracycline and Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as Aureo S-700G at 44 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 4 μg/ml TET-HCL. Chlortetracycline + sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 35 None 58 None 32.70 None 52.30 None 107 111 None None None None None
12288 12288 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10165 10165 Virginiamycin Use Virginiamycin, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as V-Maxed at 31 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 4 μg/ml TET-HCL. Virginiamycin Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 35 None 58 None 50.70 None 52.30 None 69 111 None None None None None
12289 12289 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10163 10163 Chlortetracyline Use Chlortetracyline, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as Aureomycin 100-g at 11 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 4 μg/ml TET-HCL. Chlortetracyline Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False 35 None 47 None 47.30 None 42.30 None 74 111 None None None None None
12290 12290 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10161 10161 Chlortetracycline and Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as Aureo S-700G at 44 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 4 μg/ml TET-HCL. Chlortetracycline + sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False 59 None 47 None 55.10 None 42.30 None 107 111 None None None None None
12291 12291 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10165 10165 Virginiamycin Use Virginiamycin, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as V-Maxed at 31 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 4 μg/ml TET-HCL. Virginiamycin Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False 29 None 47 None 42.00 None 42.30 None 69 111 None None None None None
12292 12292 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10163 10163 Chlortetracyline Use Chlortetracyline, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as Aureomycin 100-g at 11 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 4 μg/ml TET-HCL. Chlortetracyline Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 74 None 110 None 100.00 None 99.10 None 74 111 None None None None None
12293 12293 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10161 10161 Chlortetracycline and Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as Aureo S-700G at 44 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 4 μg/ml TET-HCL. Chlortetracycline + sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 107 None 110 None 100.00 None 99.10 None 107 111 None None None None None
12294 12294 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10165 10165 Virginiamycin Use Virginiamycin, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as V-Maxed at 31 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 4 μg/ml TET-HCL. Virginiamycin Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 68 None 110 None 98.60 None 99.10 None 69 111 None None None None None
12295 12295 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10164 10164 Chlortetracyline Use Chlortetracyline, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as Aureomycin 100-g at 11 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 50 μg/ml AMP. Chlortetracyline Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 26 None 100.00 None 100.00 None 13 26 None None None None None
12296 12296 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10162 10162 Chlortetracycline and Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as Aureo S-700G at 44 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 50 μg/ml AMP. Chlortetracycline + sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 51 None 26 None 100.00 None 100.00 None 51 26 None None None None None
12297 12297 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10166 10166 Virginiamycin Use Virginiamycin, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as V-Maxed at 31 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 50 μg/ml AMP. Virginiamycin Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 25 None 26 None 100.00 None 100.00 None 25 26 None None None None None
12298 12298 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10164 10164 Chlortetracyline Use Chlortetracyline, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as Aureomycin 100-g at 11 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 50 μg/ml AMP. Chlortetracyline Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 16 None 15.40 None 61.50 None 13 26 None None None None None
12299 12299 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10162 10162 Chlortetracycline and Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as Aureo S-700G at 44 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 50 μg/ml AMP. Chlortetracycline + sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 16 None 5.90 None 61.50 None 51 26 None None None None None
12300 12300 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10166 10166 Virginiamycin Use Virginiamycin, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as V-Maxed at 31 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 50 μg/ml AMP. Virginiamycin Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 16 None 4.00 None 61.50 None 25 26 None None None None None
12301 12301 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10164 10164 Chlortetracyline Use Chlortetracyline, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as Aureomycin 100-g at 11 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 50 μg/ml AMP. Chlortetracyline Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 10 None 23.10 None 38.50 None 13 26 None None None None None
12302 12302 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10162 10162 Chlortetracycline and Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as Aureo S-700G at 44 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 50 μg/ml AMP. Chlortetracycline + sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 7 None 10 None 13.70 None 38.50 None 51 26 None None None None None
12303 12303 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10166 10166 Virginiamycin Use Virginiamycin, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as V-Maxed at 31 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 50 μg/ml AMP. Virginiamycin Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 10 None 10 None 40.00 None 38.50 None 25 26 None None None None None
12304 12304 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10164 10164 Chlortetracyline Use Chlortetracyline, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as Aureomycin 100-g at 11 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 50 μg/ml AMP. Chlortetracyline Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 10 None 10 None 76.90 None 38.50 None 13 26 None None None None None
12305 12305 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10162 10162 Chlortetracycline and Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as Aureo S-700G at 44 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 50 μg/ml AMP. Chlortetracycline + sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 48 None 10 None 94.10 None 38.50 None 51 26 None None None None None
12306 12306 10063 None 11778 10.1186/1471-2180-11-78 Mirzaagha2011 Distribution and characterization of ampicillin- and tetracycline-resistant Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle fed subtherapeutic antimicrobials Canada None 10166 10166 Virginiamycin Use Virginiamycin, administered in feed (days 17 - 78, 164 - 206), as V-Maxed at 31 ppm. Isolates cultured on agar amended with 50 μg/ml AMP. Virginiamycin Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 14 None 10 None 56.00 None 38.50 None 25 26 None None None None None
12307 12307 10064 None 11787 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.06.011 Mo2016 Risk factors for occurrence of cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli in Norwegian broiler flocks Norway Observational 10167 10167 3GC-R Status of Previous Flock The status of resistance to third-generation cephalosporins of the previous flock raised in the broiler house. Positive Negative Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Flock Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 12.70 4.80 33.50 <0.001 None
12308 12308 10074 None 12033 10.1093/jac/dkv053 Nguyen2015 Prevalence and risk factors for carriage of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli on household and small-scale chicken farms in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam Viet Nam None 10204 10204 Farm Size Farm Size (Household [10-200] vs. Small Farm [200-2000]) Small Farm Household Farm Chicken Other None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 6.42 2.74 15.03 <0.001 None
12309 12309 10074 None 12033 10.1093/jac/dkv053 Nguyen2015 Prevalence and risk factors for carriage of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli on household and small-scale chicken farms in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam Viet Nam None 10205 10205 Feed Source None Commercial Feed Non-Commercial Feed Chicken Other None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.87 1.06 3.30 0.032 None
12310 12310 10074 None 12033 10.1093/jac/dkv053 Nguyen2015 Prevalence and risk factors for carriage of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli on household and small-scale chicken farms in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam Viet Nam None 10201 10201 Biosecurity Practiced Footwear changed prior to entering the broiler house. Yes No Chicken Other None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.43 1.44 4.09 <0.001 None
12311 12311 10074 None 12033 10.1093/jac/dkv053 Nguyen2015 Prevalence and risk factors for carriage of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli on household and small-scale chicken farms in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam Viet Nam None 10200 10200 All-in-All-out (AIAO) Production System None Yes No Chicken Other None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.17 0.02 1.28 0.086 None
12312 12312 10074 None 12033 10.1093/jac/dkv053 Nguyen2015 Prevalence and risk factors for carriage of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli on household and small-scale chicken farms in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam Viet Nam None 10208 10208 Quinolone Use Use of one or more of: flumequine, oxolinic acid, norfloxacin, or enrofloxacin. No AMU level provided. Quinolone Use No Use Chicken Other None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.26 1.20 4.25 0.011 None
12313 12313 10074 None 12033 10.1093/jac/dkv053 Nguyen2015 Prevalence and risk factors for carriage of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli on household and small-scale chicken farms in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam Viet Nam None 10210 10210 Tetracycline Use Use of one or more of: doxycycline, oxytetracycline, or tetracycline. No AMU level provided. Tetracycline Use No Use Chicken Other None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.70 1.05 2.76 0.031 None
12314 12314 10074 None 12033 10.1093/jac/dkv053 Nguyen2015 Prevalence and risk factors for carriage of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli on household and small-scale chicken farms in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam Viet Nam None 10210 10210 Tetracycline Use Use of one or more of: doxycycline, oxytetracycline, or tetracycline. No AMU level provided. Tetracycline Use No Use Chicken Other None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.99 1.17 3.36 0.011 None
12315 12315 10074 None 12033 10.1093/jac/dkv053 Nguyen2015 Prevalence and risk factors for carriage of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli on household and small-scale chicken farms in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam Viet Nam None 10207 10207 Presence of Cat(s) on the Farm None Yes No Chicken Other None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.44 0.24 0.82 0.01 None
12316 12316 10074 None 12033 10.1093/jac/dkv053 Nguyen2015 Prevalence and risk factors for carriage of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli on household and small-scale chicken farms in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam Viet Nam None 10201 10201 Biosecurity Practiced Footwear changed prior to entering the broiler house. Yes No Chicken Other None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.41 1.27 4.59 0.007 None
12317 12317 10074 None 12033 10.1093/jac/dkv053 Nguyen2015 Prevalence and risk factors for carriage of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli on household and small-scale chicken farms in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam Viet Nam None 10209 10209 Source of Day-Old Chicks None Local Hatcheries, Markets, or Neighbours Industrial Hatcheries Chicken Other None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.93 1.22 19.97 0.026 None
12318 12318 10074 None 12033 10.1093/jac/dkv053 Nguyen2015 Prevalence and risk factors for carriage of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli on household and small-scale chicken farms in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam Viet Nam None 10203 10203 Farm Purpose None Meat Production Egg Production Chicken Other None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 9.88 5.32 18.33 <0.001 None
12319 12319 10074 None 12033 10.1093/jac/dkv053 Nguyen2015 Prevalence and risk factors for carriage of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli on household and small-scale chicken farms in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam Viet Nam None 10202 10202 Farm Purpose None Meat and Egg Production Egg Production Chicken Other None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 5.03 1.81 14.01 0.002 None
12320 12320 10085 None 12444 10.3168/jds.2011-4337 Pereira2011 Antimicrobial resistance and prevalence of virulence factor genes in fecal Escherichia coli of Holstein calves fed milk with and without antimicrobials United States of America None 10233 10233 Growth Promoter Use Growth promoters added to milk as 1.56 ml/L sulfamethazine sodium, and 1.04 mg/L chlortetracycline. Growth Promoter Use No Growth Promoter Use Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 94.20 None 31.20 None 159 92 None None None None None
12321 12321 10085 None 12444 10.3168/jds.2011-4337 Pereira2011 Antimicrobial resistance and prevalence of virulence factor genes in fecal Escherichia coli of Holstein calves fed milk with and without antimicrobials United States of America None 10233 10233 Growth Promoter Use Growth promoters added to milk as 1.56 ml/L sulfamethazine sodium, and 1.04 mg/L chlortetracycline. Growth Promoter Use No Growth Promoter Use Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 96.80 None 70.80 None 159 92 None None None None None
12322 12322 10085 None 12444 10.3168/jds.2011-4337 Pereira2011 Antimicrobial resistance and prevalence of virulence factor genes in fecal Escherichia coli of Holstein calves fed milk with and without antimicrobials United States of America None 10233 10233 Growth Promoter Use Growth promoters added to milk as 1.56 ml/L sulfamethazine sodium, and 1.04 mg/L chlortetracycline. Growth Promoter Use No Growth Promoter Use Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 92.30 None 59.40 None 159 92 None None None None None
12323 12323 10085 None 12444 10.3168/jds.2011-4337 Pereira2011 Antimicrobial resistance and prevalence of virulence factor genes in fecal Escherichia coli of Holstein calves fed milk with and without antimicrobials United States of America None 10233 10233 Growth Promoter Use Growth promoters added to milk as 1.56 ml/L sulfamethazine sodium, and 1.04 mg/L chlortetracycline. Growth Promoter Use No Growth Promoter Use Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 36.13 None 12.50 None 159 92 None None None None None
12324 12324 10085 None 12444 10.3168/jds.2011-4337 Pereira2011 Antimicrobial resistance and prevalence of virulence factor genes in fecal Escherichia coli of Holstein calves fed milk with and without antimicrobials United States of America None 10233 10233 Growth Promoter Use Growth promoters added to milk as 1.56 ml/L sulfamethazine sodium, and 1.04 mg/L chlortetracycline. Growth Promoter Use No Growth Promoter Use Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 85.20 None 53.10 None 159 92 None None None None None
12325 12325 10085 None 12444 10.3168/jds.2011-4337 Pereira2011 Antimicrobial resistance and prevalence of virulence factor genes in fecal Escherichia coli of Holstein calves fed milk with and without antimicrobials United States of America None 10233 10233 Growth Promoter Use Growth promoters added to milk as 1.56 ml/L sulfamethazine sodium, and 1.04 mg/L chlortetracycline. Growth Promoter Use No Growth Promoter Use Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.30 None 5.20 None 159 92 None None None None None
12326 12326 10085 None 12444 10.3168/jds.2011-4337 Pereira2011 Antimicrobial resistance and prevalence of virulence factor genes in fecal Escherichia coli of Holstein calves fed milk with and without antimicrobials United States of America None 10233 10233 Growth Promoter Use Growth promoters added to milk as 1.56 ml/L sulfamethazine sodium, and 1.04 mg/L chlortetracycline. Growth Promoter Use No Growth Promoter Use Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.90 None 7.30 None 159 92 None None None None None
12327 12327 10085 None 12444 10.3168/jds.2011-4337 Pereira2011 Antimicrobial resistance and prevalence of virulence factor genes in fecal Escherichia coli of Holstein calves fed milk with and without antimicrobials United States of America None 10233 10233 Growth Promoter Use Growth promoters added to milk as 1.56 ml/L sulfamethazine sodium, and 1.04 mg/L chlortetracycline. Growth Promoter Use No Growth Promoter Use Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 9.00 None 41.70 None 159 92 None None None None None
12328 12328 10125 None 13911 10.2460/ajvr.67.10.1696 Tragesser2006 Association between ceftiofur use and isolation of Escherichia coli with reduced susceptibility to ceftriaxone from fecal samples of dairy cows United States of America None 10352 10352 Ceftiofur Use Outcome was defined as reduced susceptibility, measured as a minimum inhibitory concentration of > 8 μg/mL. Ceftiofur Use No Use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Herd Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 25.00 1.29 1121.50 0.01 None
12329 12329 10064 None 11787 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.06.011 Mo2016 Risk factors for occurrence of cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli in Norwegian broiler flocks Norway Observational 10171 10171 Transport Personnel Enter Broiler House None Occasionally Never Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Flock Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 9.30 1.60 55.10 0.01 None
12330 12330 10064 None 11787 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.06.011 Mo2016 Risk factors for occurrence of cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli in Norwegian broiler flocks Norway Observational 10168 10168 Disinfection between Production Cycles Disinfection of floor between production cycles. Disinfection Always Occurs Disinfection Does Not Always Occurs Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Flock Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.10 0.03 0.60 0.01 None
12331 12331 10064 None 11787 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.06.011 Mo2016 Risk factors for occurrence of cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli in Norwegian broiler flocks Norway Observational 10170 10170 Number of Parent Flocks None 1 2 Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Flock Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.20 0.90 11.10 0.06 None
12332 12332 10064 None 11787 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.06.011 Mo2016 Risk factors for occurrence of cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli in Norwegian broiler flocks Norway Observational 10169 10169 Number of Parent Flocks None 1 >2 Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Flock Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 6.30 1.60 25.00 0.01 None
12333 12333 10243 None 7541 Asai_2007_JaJoofInDi Association of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter isolated from food-producing animals with antimicrobial use on farms Japan Experimental 10720 10720 Fluoroquinolone Use Fluoroquinolone Use in the Past 6 Months Fluoroquinolone Use No Fluoroquinolone Use Cattle Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 0 None 14 None None None None None 1 69 None None None None None
12334 12334 10243 None 7541 Asai_2007_JaJoofInDi Association of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter isolated from food-producing animals with antimicrobial use on farms Japan Experimental 10724 10724 Tetracycline Use Tetracycline Use in the Past 6 Months Tetracycline Use No Tetracycline Use Cattle Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 1 None 28 None None None None None 1 69 None None None None None
12335 12335 10243 None 7541 Asai_2007_JaJoofInDi Association of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter isolated from food-producing animals with antimicrobial use on farms Japan Experimental 10722 10722 Tetracycline Use Tetracycline Use in the Past 6 Months Tetracycline Use No Tetracycline Use Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 3 None 51 None None None None None 5 117 None None None None None
12336 12336 10253 None 8030 Boulianne_2016_CaJoofVeRe Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among escherichia coli and enterococcus spp. Isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada Canada Observational 10764 10764 Gentamicin Use Gentamicin Use at Hatchery. No AMU level provided. Gentamicin Use No Use Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Flock Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 69.00 None 1 49 None None None None None
12337 12337 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10817 10817 Growth Promotion Ban Pre-GP ban ('92-'96) vs. Post-GP Ban ('01-'02) in conventional production. GPs banned included avoparcin, virginiamycin, tylosin, spiramycin, bactracin. Growth Promoters Banned Growth Promoters Allowed Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 14.20 None 32.60 None 323 129 None None None None None
12338 12338 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10817 10817 Growth Promotion Ban Pre-GP ban ('92-'96) vs. Post-GP Ban ('01-'02) in conventional production. GPs banned included avoparcin, virginiamycin, tylosin, spiramycin, bactracin. Growth Promoters Banned Growth Promoters Allowed Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 4.00 None 2.30 None 316 130 None None None None None
12339 12339 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10817 10817 Growth Promotion Ban Pre-GP ban ('92-'96) vs. Post-GP Ban ('01-'02) in conventional production. GPs banned included avoparcin, virginiamycin, tylosin, spiramycin, bactracin. Growth Promoters Banned Growth Promoters Allowed Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 316 125 None None None None None
12340 12340 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10818 10818 Production Type Pre-GP ban ('92-'96). Free-range is comparable to organic production. Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 33.30 None 32.30 None 36 93 None None None None None
12341 12341 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10818 10818 Production Type Pre-GP ban ('92-'96). Free-range is comparable to organic production. Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 5.60 None 1.10 None 36 94 None None None None None
12342 12342 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10818 10818 Production Type Pre-GP ban ('92-'96). Free-range is comparable to organic production. Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 95 None None None None None
12343 12343 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10091 10091 CCFA 1 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a single dose (6.6 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Single Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.14 None 240 723 None None None None None
12344 12344 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10092 10092 CCFA 2/3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a two-thirds dose regimen (4.4 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Two-Thirds Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.14 None 240 723 None None None None None
12345 12345 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10093 10093 CCFA 3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a 3-dose regimen (6.6 mg/kg, SC, Day 0, 6, 13). CCFA Three Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.14 None 238 723 None None None None None
12346 12346 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10091 10091 CCFA 1 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a single dose (6.6 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Single Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.83 None 0.00 None 240 723 None None None None None
12347 12347 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10092 10092 CCFA 2/3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a two-thirds dose regimen (4.4 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Two-Thirds Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 240 723 None None None None None
12348 12348 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10093 10093 CCFA 3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a 3-dose regimen (6.6 mg/kg, SC, Day 0, 6, 13). CCFA Three Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.42 None 0.00 None 238 723 None None None None None
12349 12349 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10091 10091 CCFA 1 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a single dose (6.6 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Single Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.25 None 0.41 None 240 723 None None None None None
12350 12350 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10092 10092 CCFA 2/3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a two-thirds dose regimen (4.4 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Two-Thirds Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.67 None 0.41 None 240 723 None None None None None
12351 12351 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10093 10093 CCFA 3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a 3-dose regimen (6.6 mg/kg, SC, Day 0, 6, 13). CCFA Three Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.94 None 0.41 None 238 723 None None None None None
12352 12352 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10091 10091 CCFA 1 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a single dose (6.6 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Single Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 35.00 None 18.30 None 240 723 None None None None None
12353 12353 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10092 10092 CCFA 2/3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a two-thirds dose regimen (4.4 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Two-Thirds Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 40.80 None 18.30 None 240 723 None None None None None
12354 12354 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10093 10093 CCFA 3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a 3-dose regimen (6.6 mg/kg, SC, Day 0, 6, 13). CCFA Three Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 67.60 None 18.30 None 238 723 None None None None None
12355 12355 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10091 10091 CCFA 1 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a single dose (6.6 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Single Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 62.10 None 51.20 None 240 723 None None None None None
12356 12356 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10092 10092 CCFA 2/3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a two-thirds dose regimen (4.4 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Two-Thirds Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 72.90 None 51.20 None 240 723 None None None None None
12357 12357 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10093 10093 CCFA 3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a 3-dose regimen (6.6 mg/kg, SC, Day 0, 6, 13). CCFA Three Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 87.00 None 51.20 None 238 723 None None None None None
12358 12358 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10091 10091 CCFA 1 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a single dose (6.6 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Single Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.75 None 0.55 None 240 723 None None None None None
12359 12359 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10092 10092 CCFA 2/3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a two-thirds dose regimen (4.4 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Two-Thirds Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.08 None 0.55 None 240 723 None None None None None
12360 12360 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10093 10093 CCFA 3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a 3-dose regimen (6.6 mg/kg, SC, Day 0, 6, 13). CCFA Three Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.94 None 0.55 None 238 723 None None None None None
12361 12361 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10091 10091 CCFA 1 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a single dose (6.6 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Single Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 21.30 None 7.61 None 240 723 None None None None None
12362 12362 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10092 10092 CCFA 2/3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a two-thirds dose regimen (4.4 mg/kg, SC). CCFA Two-Thirds Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 34.20 None 7.61 None 240 723 None None None None None
12363 12363 10043 None 11327 10.2460/ajvr.68.5.501 Lowrance2007 Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility in a population of Escherichia coli isolated from feedlot cattle administered ceftiofur crystalline-free acid United States of America Experimental 10093 10093 CCFA 3 Dose Regimen Ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (CCFA) administered as a 3-dose regimen (6.6 mg/kg, SC, Day 0, 6, 13). CCFA Three Dose No CCFA Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 61.80 None 7.61 None 238 723 None None None None None
12364 12364 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10547 10547 Use of Tetracyclines in the Past 6 Months Use of Tetracyclines in the Past 6 Months Use of Tetracyclines No Use of Tetracyclines Swine None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides dihydrostreptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 69.70 None 44.10 None 66 356 None None None None None
12365 12365 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10545 10545 Use of Pencillins in the Past 6 Months Use of Pencillins in the Past 6 Months Use of Penicillins No Use of Penicillins Swine None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides dihydrostreptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 58.80 None 44.10 None 34 356 None None None None None
12366 12366 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10544 10544 Use of Methaprim-Sulfonamide Combinations in the Past 6 Months Use of Methaprim-Sulfonamide Combinations in the Past 6 Months Use of Methaprim-sulfonamides No Use of Methaprim-sulfonamides Swine None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides dihydrostreptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 42.40 None 44.10 None 33 356 None None None None None
12367 12367 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10546 10546 Use of Penicillin-Streptomycin Combinations in the Past 6 Months Use of Penicillin-Streptomycin Combinations in the Past 6 Months Use of Penicillin-Streptomycins No Use of Penicillin-Streptomycin Swine None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides dihydrostreptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 77.30 None 44.10 None 22 356 None None None None None
12368 12368 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10547 10547 Use of Tetracyclines in the Past 6 Months Use of Tetracyclines in the Past 6 Months Use of Tetracyclines No Use of Tetracyclines Swine None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 24.20 None 14.30 None 66 356 None None None None None
12369 12369 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10545 10545 Use of Pencillins in the Past 6 Months Use of Pencillins in the Past 6 Months Use of Penicillins No Use of Penicillins Swine None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 14.70 None 14.30 None 34 356 None None None None None
12370 12370 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10544 10544 Use of Methaprim-Sulfonamide Combinations in the Past 6 Months Use of Methaprim-Sulfonamide Combinations in the Past 6 Months Use of Methaprim-sulfonamides No Use of Methaprim-sulfonamides Swine None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 21.20 None 14.30 None 33 356 None None None None None
12371 12371 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10546 10546 Use of Penicillin-Streptomycin Combinations in the Past 6 Months Use of Penicillin-Streptomycin Combinations in the Past 6 Months Use of Penicillin-Streptomycins No Use of Penicillin-Streptomycin Swine None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 31.80 None 14.30 None 22 356 None None None None None
12372 12372 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10547 10547 Use of Tetracyclines in the Past 6 Months Use of Tetracyclines in the Past 6 Months Use of Tetracyclines No Use of Tetracyclines Swine None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 34.80 None 21.60 None 66 356 None None None None None
12373 12373 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10545 10545 Use of Pencillins in the Past 6 Months Use of Pencillins in the Past 6 Months Use of Penicillins No Use of Penicillins Swine None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 38.20 None 21.60 None 34 356 None None None None None
12374 12374 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10544 10544 Use of Methaprim-Sulfonamide Combinations in the Past 6 Months Use of Methaprim-Sulfonamide Combinations in the Past 6 Months Use of Methaprim-sulfonamides No Use of Methaprim-sulfonamides Swine None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 45.50 None 21.60 None 33 356 None None None None None
12375 12375 10204 None 9796 10.1089/mdr.2008.0836 Harada2008 Farm-level impact of therapeutic antimicrobial use on antimicrobial- resistant populations of Escherichia coli isolates from pigs Japan Observational 10546 10546 Use of Penicillin-Streptomycin Combinations in the Past 6 Months Use of Penicillin-Streptomycin Combinations in the Past 6 Months Use of Penicillin-Streptomycins No Use of Penicillin-Streptomycin Swine None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 22.70 None 21.60 None 22 356 None None None None None
12376 12376 10065 None 11825 10.1089/fpd.2014.1808 Mollenkopf2014 Organic or antibiotic-free labeling does not impact the recovery of enteric pathogens and antimicrobial-resistant escherichia coli from fresh retail chicken United States of America None 10176 10176 Production Type Measured as presence of CTX-M gene, following selective isolation. Antibiotic Free Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat None None None Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 5 None None None None None 96 95 None None None None None
12377 12377 10065 None 11825 10.1089/fpd.2014.1808 Mollenkopf2014 Organic or antibiotic-free labeling does not impact the recovery of enteric pathogens and antimicrobial-resistant escherichia coli from fresh retail chicken United States of America None 10177 10177 Production Type Measured as presence of CTX-M gene, following selective isolation. Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat None See gene column CTX-M (family) Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 5 None None None None None 40 95 None None None None None
12378 12378 10065 None 11825 10.1089/fpd.2014.1808 Mollenkopf2014 Organic or antibiotic-free labeling does not impact the recovery of enteric pathogens and antimicrobial-resistant escherichia coli from fresh retail chicken United States of America None 10174 10174 Production Type Measured as presence of CMY-2 gene, following selective isolation. Antibiotic Free Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat None See gene column CMY-2 Escherichia coli False None False 54 None 49 None None None None None 96 95 None None None None None
12379 12379 10065 None 11825 10.1089/fpd.2014.1808 Mollenkopf2014 Organic or antibiotic-free labeling does not impact the recovery of enteric pathogens and antimicrobial-resistant escherichia coli from fresh retail chicken United States of America None 10175 10175 Production Type Measured as presence of CMY-2 gene, following selective isolation. Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat None See gene column CMY-2 Escherichia coli False None False 21 None 49 None None None None None 40 95 None None None None None
12380 12380 10068 None 11881 10.1089/fpd.2010.0632 Morley2011 Effects of Restricted Antimicrobial Exposure on Antimicrobial Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli from Feedlot Cattle United States of America None 10186 10186 Production Type None Natural (ABF) Conventional Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 4169 0 4713 None None None None 4169 4713 None None None None None
12381 12381 10068 None 11881 10.1089/fpd.2010.0632 Morley2011 Effects of Restricted Antimicrobial Exposure on Antimicrobial Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli from Feedlot Cattle United States of America None 10186 10186 Production Type None Natural (ABF) Conventional Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 31 4138 64 4649 None None None None 4169 4713 None None None None None
12382 12382 10068 None 11881 10.1089/fpd.2010.0632 Morley2011 Effects of Restricted Antimicrobial Exposure on Antimicrobial Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli from Feedlot Cattle United States of America None 10186 10186 Production Type None Natural (ABF) Conventional Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 4001 1 4493 None None None None 4169 4713 None None None None None
12383 12383 10068 None 11881 10.1089/fpd.2010.0632 Morley2011 Effects of Restricted Antimicrobial Exposure on Antimicrobial Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli from Feedlot Cattle United States of America None 10186 10186 Production Type None Natural (ABF) Conventional Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False 27 4142 39 4674 None None None None 4169 4713 None None None None None
12384 12384 10068 None 11881 10.1089/fpd.2010.0632 Morley2011 Effects of Restricted Antimicrobial Exposure on Antimicrobial Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli from Feedlot Cattle United States of America None 10186 10186 Production Type None Natural (ABF) Conventional Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 179 3990 325 4388 None None None None 4169 4713 None None None None None
12385 12385 10068 None 11881 10.1089/fpd.2010.0632 Morley2011 Effects of Restricted Antimicrobial Exposure on Antimicrobial Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli from Feedlot Cattle United States of America None 10186 10186 Production Type None Natural (ABF) Conventional Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False 409 3760 604 4109 None None None None 4169 4713 None None None None None
12386 12386 10068 None 11881 10.1089/fpd.2010.0632 Morley2011 Effects of Restricted Antimicrobial Exposure on Antimicrobial Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli from Feedlot Cattle United States of America None 10187 10187 Production Type None Natural Cattle Conventional Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 14 4155 16 4697 None None None None 4169 4713 None None None None None
12387 12387 10074 None 12033 10.1093/jac/dkv053 Nguyen2015 Prevalence and risk factors for carriage of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli on household and small-scale chicken farms in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam Viet Nam None 10206 10206 Lincomycin Use No AMU level provided. Lincomycin Use No Use Chicken Other None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.74 1.18 18.97 0.028 None
12388 12388 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10330 10330 Sarafloxacin Use Sarafloxacin, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 20 ppm over 5 days. Sarafloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones sarafloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 33.00 None 33.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12389 12389 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10327 10327 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 25 ppm over 3 days. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones sarafloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 47.00 None 33.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12390 12390 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10328 10328 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 25 ppm over 5 days. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones sarafloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 33.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12391 12391 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10250 10250 Production Type None Organic Conventional Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False 9 None 21 None None None None None 26 69 None None None None None
12392 12392 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10250 10250 Production Type None Organic Conventional Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 8 None 22 None None None None None 26 69 None None None None None
12393 12393 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10250 10250 Production Type None Organic Conventional Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 26 69 None None None None None
12394 12394 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10250 10250 Production Type None Organic Conventional Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella spp. False None False 8 None 26 None None None None None 26 69 None None None None None
12395 12395 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10250 10250 Production Type None Organic Conventional Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False 3 None 14 None None None None None 26 69 None None None None None
12396 12396 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10250 10250 Production Type None Organic Conventional Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 26 69 None None None None None
12397 12397 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10250 10250 Production Type None Organic Conventional Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 7 None None None None None 26 69 None None None None None
12398 12398 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10250 10250 Production Type None Organic Conventional Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 4 None 15 None None None None None 26 69 None None None None None
12399 12399 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10250 10250 Production Type None Organic Conventional Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 26 69 None None None None None
12400 12400 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10250 10250 Production Type None Organic Conventional Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 2 None 21 None None None None None 26 69 None None None None None
12401 12401 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10250 10250 Production Type None Organic Conventional Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella spp. False None False 4 None 20 None None None None None 26 69 None None None None None
12402 12402 10092 None 12755 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72271-8 Ray2006 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella from organic and conventional dairy farms United States of America Experimental 10252 10252 Production Type Production Type Organic Conventional Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 26 69 None None None None None
12403 12403 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10284 10284 Production Type Production Type (Calves) Organic Conventional Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 5 None None None None None 281 284 None None None None None
12404 12404 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10285 10285 Production Type Production Type (Cows) Organic Conventional Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 270 286 None None None None None
12405 12405 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10284 10284 Production Type Production Type (Calves) Organic Conventional Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False 14 None 14 None None None None None 281 284 None None None None None
12406 12406 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10285 10285 Production Type Production Type (Cows) Organic Conventional Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 9 None None None None None 270 286 None None None None None
12407 12407 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10284 10284 Production Type Production Type (Calves) Organic Conventional Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 7 None None None None None 281 284 None None None None None
12408 12408 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10285 10285 Production Type Production Type (Cows) Organic Conventional Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 270 286 None None None None None
12409 12409 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10284 10284 Production Type Production Type (Calves) Organic Conventional Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 281 284 None None None None None
12410 12410 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10285 10285 Production Type Production Type (Cows) Organic Conventional Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 270 286 None None None None None
12411 12411 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10284 10284 Production Type Production Type (Calves) Organic Conventional Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 281 284 None None None None None
12412 12412 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10285 10285 Production Type Production Type (Cows) Organic Conventional Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 270 286 None None None None None
12413 12413 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10284 10284 Production Type Production Type (Calves) Organic Conventional Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 281 284 None None None None None
12414 12414 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10285 10285 Production Type Production Type (Cows) Organic Conventional Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 270 286 None None None None None
12415 12415 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10284 10284 Production Type Production Type (Calves) Organic Conventional Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 281 284 None None None None None
12416 12416 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10285 10285 Production Type Production Type (Cows) Organic Conventional Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 270 286 None None None None None
12417 12417 20023 None 13525 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.020 Soonthornchaikul2006 Resistance to three antimicrobial agents of Campylobacter isolated from organically- and intensively-reared chickens purchased from retail outlets United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 11257 11257 Production Type Pre-packaged products, purchased from the supermarket. Organic Intensive (Conventional) Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 95.00 None 100.00 None 120 125 None None None None None
12418 12418 20023 None 13525 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.020 Soonthornchaikul2006 Resistance to three antimicrobial agents of Campylobacter isolated from organically- and intensively-reared chickens purchased from retail outlets United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 11256 11256 Packaging Type / Retail Location Intensive Production (Conventional Rearing) Products Unpackaged (Butcher) Pre-packaged (Supermarket) Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 81.40 None 100.00 None 150 125 None None None None None
12419 12419 10327 None 13084 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.005 Sapkota_2014_ScofthToEn Lower prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella on large-scale U.S. conventional poultry farms that transitioned to organic practices United States of America None 10982 10982 Production Type Data for Salmonella Kentucky Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 2 None 4 None None None None None 32 9 None None None None None
12420 12420 10327 None 13084 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.005 Sapkota_2014_ScofthToEn Lower prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella on large-scale U.S. conventional poultry farms that transitioned to organic practices United States of America None 10982 10982 Production Type Data for Salmonella Kentucky Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 2 None 4 None None None None None 32 9 None None None None None
12421 12421 10327 None 13084 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.005 Sapkota_2014_ScofthToEn Lower prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella on large-scale U.S. conventional poultry farms that transitioned to organic practices United States of America None 10982 10982 Production Type Data for Salmonella Kentucky Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 2 None 4 None None None None None 32 9 None None None None None
12422 12422 10327 None 13084 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.005 Sapkota_2014_ScofthToEn Lower prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella on large-scale U.S. conventional poultry farms that transitioned to organic practices United States of America None 10982 10982 Production Type Data for Salmonella Kentucky Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 32 9 None None None None None
12423 12423 10327 None 13084 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.005 Sapkota_2014_ScofthToEn Lower prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella on large-scale U.S. conventional poultry farms that transitioned to organic practices United States of America None 10982 10982 Production Type Data for Salmonella Kentucky Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 32 9 None None None None None
12424 12424 10327 None 13084 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.005 Sapkota_2014_ScofthToEn Lower prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella on large-scale U.S. conventional poultry farms that transitioned to organic practices United States of America None 10982 10982 Production Type Data for Salmonella Kentucky Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 32 9 None None None None None
12425 12425 10327 None 13084 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.005 Sapkota_2014_ScofthToEn Lower prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella on large-scale U.S. conventional poultry farms that transitioned to organic practices United States of America None 10982 10982 Production Type Data for Salmonella Kentucky Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 32 9 None None None None None
12426 12426 10327 None 13084 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.005 Sapkota_2014_ScofthToEn Lower prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella on large-scale U.S. conventional poultry farms that transitioned to organic practices United States of America None 10982 10982 Production Type Data for Salmonella Kentucky Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 32 9 None None None None None
12490 12490 10172 None 9010 10.1089/fpd.2009.0417 Edrington2010 Influence of wet distiller's grains on prevalence of <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157:H7 and <i>Salmonella</> in feedlot cattle and antimicrobial susceptibility of generic <i>Escherichia coli<i> isolates United States of America None 10494 10494 Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Dry Rolled Corn Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Dry Rolled Corn Inclusion of WDG No WDG Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 2 None None None None None 18 18 None None None None None
12427 12427 10327 None 13084 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.005 Sapkota_2014_ScofthToEn Lower prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella on large-scale U.S. conventional poultry farms that transitioned to organic practices United States of America None 10982 10982 Production Type Data for Salmonella Kentucky Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 32 9 None None None None None
12428 12428 10327 None 13084 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.005 Sapkota_2014_ScofthToEn Lower prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella on large-scale U.S. conventional poultry farms that transitioned to organic practices United States of America None 10982 10982 Production Type Data for Salmonella Kentucky Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 32 None 9 None None None None None 32 9 None None None None None
12429 12429 10327 None 13084 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.005 Sapkota_2014_ScofthToEn Lower prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella on large-scale U.S. conventional poultry farms that transitioned to organic practices United States of America None 10982 10982 Production Type Data for Salmonella Kentucky Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 32 9 None None None None None
12430 12430 10125 None 13911 10.2460/ajvr.67.10.1696 Tragesser2006 Association between ceftiofur use and isolation of Escherichia coli with reduced susceptibility to ceftriaxone from fecal samples of dairy cows United States of America None 10352 10352 Ceftiofur Use Outcome was defined as reduced susceptibility, measured as a minimum inhibitory concentration of > 8 μg/mL. Ceftiofur Use No Use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Animal Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.01 0.94 1.07 0.83 None
12431 12431 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11107 11107 Chilling Method None Air Chilling Immersion Chilling Chicken Carcass None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones levofloxacin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 28 37 None None None None None
12432 12432 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11107 11107 Chilling Method None Air Chilling Immersion Chilling Chicken Carcass None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones grepafloxacin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 28 37 None None None None None
12433 12433 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11107 11107 Chilling Method None Air Chilling Immersion Chilling Chicken Carcass None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 28 37 None None None None None
12434 12434 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11107 11107 Chilling Method None Air Chilling Immersion Chilling Chicken Carcass None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 40.00 None 66.70 None 28 37 None None None None None
12435 12435 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11107 11107 Chilling Method None Air Chilling Immersion Chilling Chicken Carcass None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 33.30 None 60.00 None 28 37 None None None None None
12436 12436 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11107 11107 Chilling Method None Air Chilling Immersion Chilling Chicken Carcass None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 9.10 None 50.00 None 59 73 None None None None None
12437 12437 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11107 11107 Chilling Method None Air Chilling Immersion Chilling Chicken Carcass None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 9.10 None 50.00 None 59 73 None None None None None
12438 12438 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10725 10725 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Bulk Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 14.30 None 0.00 None 42 47 None None None 0.101 None
12439 12439 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10727 10727 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 28.00 None 0.00 None 50 47 None None None 0.118 None
12440 12440 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10726 10726 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Pasteurized Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 27.10 None 0.00 None 48 47 None None None 0.495 None
12441 12441 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10725 10725 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Bulk Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.40 None 0.00 None 42 47 None None None 0.101 None
12442 12442 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10727 10727 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 50 47 None None None 0.118 None
12443 12443 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10726 10726 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Pasteurized Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 48 47 None None None 0.495 None
12444 12444 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10725 10725 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Bulk Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 42 47 None None None 0.101 None
12445 12445 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10727 10727 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 50 47 None None None 0.118 None
12446 12446 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10726 10726 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Pasteurized Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 48 47 None None None 0.495 None
12447 12447 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10725 10725 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Bulk Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.80 None 0.00 None 42 47 None None None 0.101 None
12448 12448 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10727 10727 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 12.00 None 0.00 None 50 47 None None None 0.118 None
12449 12449 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10726 10726 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Pasteurized Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 25.00 None 0.00 None 48 47 None None None 0.495 None
12450 12450 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10725 10725 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Bulk Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 14.30 None 2.10 None 42 47 None None None 0.101 None
12451 12451 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10727 10727 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 2.10 None 50 47 None None None 0.118 None
12452 12452 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10726 10726 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Pasteurized Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 25.00 None 2.10 None 48 47 None None None 0.495 None
12453 12453 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10725 10725 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Bulk Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines doxycycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 11.90 None 2.10 None 42 47 None None None 0.101 None
12454 12454 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10727 10727 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines doxycycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 2.10 None 50 47 None None None 0.118 None
12455 12455 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10726 10726 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Pasteurized Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines doxycycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 25.00 None 2.10 None 48 47 None None None 0.495 None
12456 12456 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10725 10725 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Bulk Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.80 None 0.00 None 42 47 None None None 0.101 None
12457 12457 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10727 10727 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 20.00 None 0.00 None 50 47 None None None 0.118 None
12458 12458 10244 None 7580 10.1111/jpn.12019 Aust_2013_JoofAnPhanAnNu Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: Effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria Germany None 10726 10726 Milk Intake Caves were offered milk, twice daily, starting at 3 days of age, from one of three sources. The baseline measurement was taken at 2 days of age. Pasteurized Waste Milk Colostrum Only (measured day 2) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 20.80 None 0.00 None 48 47 None None None 0.495 None
12459 12459 10357 None 7723 10.1128/AAC.03106-14 Baron_2014_AntAgeandChe Impact of third-generation-cephalosporin administration in hatcheries on fecal Escherichia coli antimicrobial resistance in broilers and layers France Experimental 11055 11055 Ceftiofur Use Ceftiofur administration in-ovo (0.1 mg) at 18 days of incubation. Ceftiofur Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False 116 None 39 None None None None None 330 349 None None None None None
12460 12460 10357 None 7723 10.1128/AAC.03106-14 Baron_2014_AntAgeandChe Impact of third-generation-cephalosporin administration in hatcheries on fecal Escherichia coli antimicrobial resistance in broilers and layers France Experimental 11056 11056 Ceftiofur Use Ceftiofur administration subcutaneously (0.1 mg) at 1 days. Ceftiofur Use No Use Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False 104 None 42 None None None None None 224 192 None None None None None
12461 12461 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10753 10753 Farm size Farm size 450-750 veal calves <450 veal calves Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 17 None 5 None None None None None None None 1.80 0.50 6.20 None None
12462 12462 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10752 10752 Farm size Farm size >750 veal calves <450 veal calves Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 26 None 5 None None None None None None None 2.10 0.70 6.50 None None
12463 12463 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10756 10756 Number of calves per pen Number of calves per pen > or equal to 20 calves per pen <20 calves per pen Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 42 None None None None None None None 0.60 0.20 1.50 None None
12464 12464 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10754 10754 Feeding roughage Feeding roughage after first week of production cycle from start production cycle Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 22 None 26 None None None None None None None 1.10 0.60 1.90 None None
12465 12465 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10757 10757 Pest control of flies Pest control of flies Active pest control of flies No pest control of flies Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 37 None 11 None None None None None None None 1.20 0.50 2.60 None None
12466 12466 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10755 10755 Frequency of changing work clothes Frequency of changing work clothes Farmer changes work clothes 2−4 times per week Farmer wears clean work clothes every day Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 38 None 10 None None None None None None None 1.70 0.80 3.70 None None
12467 12467 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10744 10744 Administration of aminoglycosides (neomycin and gentamycin) Administration of aminoglycosides (neomycin and gentamycin) Administration No Administration Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 27 None 21 None None None None None None None 1.20 0.60 2.60 None None
12468 12468 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10745 10745 Administration of cephalosporins (Cefquinome, ceftiofur) Administration of cephalosporins (Cefquinome, ceftiofur) Administration No administration Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 31 None 17 None None None None None None None 0.30 0.10 0.60 None None
12469 12469 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10748 10748 Administration of quinolones (Enrofloxacin, flumequine, danofloxacin, difloxacin, marbofloxacin) Administration of quinolones (Enrofloxacin, flumequine, danofloxacin, difloxacin, marbofloxacin) Administration of greater tha or equal to 0.3 ADD/pc Administration of <0.3 ADD/pc (animal daily dosage per production cycle) Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 23 None 25 None None None None None None None 0.90 0.60 1.50 None None
12470 12470 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10747 10747 Administration of penicillins (Ampicillin, amoxicillin, ampicillin-cloxacillin, benzylpenicillin) Administration of penicillins (Ampicillin, amoxicillin, ampicillin-cloxacillin, benzylpenicillin) Administration of >0.3 ADD/pc Administration of <1.3 ADD/pc Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 25 None 23 None None None None None None None 0.90 0.40 1.90 None None
12471 12471 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10751 10751 Administration of Trimethoprim-sulfonamide combinations (Trimethoprim-sulfadiazine, trimethoprim-sulfadoxine) Administration of Trimethoprim-sulfonamide combinations (Trimethoprim-sulfadiazine, trimethoprim-sulfadoxine) Administration of trimethoprim/sulfonamide combinations No administration Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 30 None 18 None None None None None None None 3.00 1.60 5.70 None None
12472 12472 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10750 10750 Administration of tetracyclines (Doxycycline, oxytetracycline) Administration of tetracyclines (Doxycycline, oxytetracycline) Administration of 20−40 ADD/pc Administration of <20 ADD/pc Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 24 None 21 None None None None None None None 1.20 0.70 2.30 None None
12473 12473 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10749 10749 Administration of tetracyclines (Doxycycline, oxytetracycline) Administration of tetracyclines (Doxycycline, oxytetracycline) Administration of >40 ADD/pc Administration of <20 ADD/pc Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 24 None 3 None None None None None None None 2.20 0.60 8.30 None None
12474 12474 10252 None 8015 10.1017/S0950268813002665 Bosman_2014_EpiandInf Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in veal calves is associated with antimicrobial drug use Netherlands None 10746 10746 Administration of colistin Administration of colistin Administration of >9.1 ADD/pc Administration of <9.1 ADD/pc Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 25 None 23 None None None None None None None 0.60 0.30 1.20 None None
12475 12475 10267 None 8370 Checkley_2010_CanaVeteJour Associations between antimicrobial use and the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle in western Canada Canada None 10805 10805 Prophylactic Oxytetracycline Use (Terramycin-50 Premix fed at 110 g/kg, 14 day) Prophylactic Oxytetracycline Use (Terramycin-50 Premix fed at 110 g/kg, 14 day) Oxytetracycline Use No Oxytetracycline Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False 24 None 26 None None None None None 84 94 None None None None None
12476 12476 10267 None 8370 Checkley_2010_CanaVeteJour Associations between antimicrobial use and the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle in western Canada Canada None 10804 10804 Metaphylactic Oxytetracycline Use (20 mg/kg Liquamycin LA-200, subcut) Metaphylactic Oxytetracycline Use (20 mg/kg Liquamycin LA-200, subcut) Oxytetracycline Use No Oxytetracycline Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 26 None None None None None 94 94 None None None None None
12477 12477 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10927 10927 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin administered, in water, as Baytril 10% at 50 mg/L, at days 1 - 3. Resistance measured at day 18. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 58.00 None 46.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.405 None
12478 12478 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10927 10927 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin administered, in water, as Baytril 10% at 50 mg/L, at days 1 - 3. Resistance measured at day 18. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 26 26 None None None None None
12479 12479 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10927 10927 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin administered, in water, as Baytril 10% at 50 mg/L, at days 1 - 3. Resistance measured at day 18. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 8.00 None 11.00 None 26 26 None None None 1 None
12480 12480 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10927 10927 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin administered, in water, as Baytril 10% at 50 mg/L, at days 1 - 3. Resistance measured at day 18. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 46.00 None 31.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.254 None
12481 12481 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10927 10927 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin administered, in water, as Baytril 10% at 50 mg/L, at days 1 - 3. Resistance measured at day 18. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 46.00 None 35.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.397 None
12482 12482 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10927 10927 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin administered, in water, as Baytril 10% at 50 mg/L, at days 1 - 3. Resistance measured at day 18. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 15.00 None 0.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.11 None
12483 12483 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10927 10927 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin administered, in water, as Baytril 10% at 50 mg/L, at days 1 - 3. Resistance measured at day 18. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 26 26 None None None None None
12484 12484 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10927 10927 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin administered, in water, as Baytril 10% at 50 mg/L, at days 1 - 3. Resistance measured at day 18. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 27.00 None 8.00 None 26 26 None None None None None
12485 12485 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10927 10927 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin administered, in water, as Baytril 10% at 50 mg/L, at days 1 - 3. Resistance measured at day 18. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 26 26 None None None None None
12486 12486 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10927 10927 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin administered, in water, as Baytril 10% at 50 mg/L, at days 1 - 3. Resistance measured at day 18. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 8.00 None 0.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12487 12487 10172 None 9010 10.1089/fpd.2009.0417 Edrington2010 Influence of wet distiller's grains on prevalence of <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157:H7 and <i>Salmonella</> in feedlot cattle and antimicrobial susceptibility of generic <i>Escherichia coli<i> isolates United States of America None 10495 10495 Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Steam Flaked Corn Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Steam Flaked Corn Inclusion of WDG No WDG Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 18 18 None None None None None
12488 12488 10172 None 9010 10.1089/fpd.2009.0417 Edrington2010 Influence of wet distiller's grains on prevalence of <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157:H7 and <i>Salmonella</> in feedlot cattle and antimicrobial susceptibility of generic <i>Escherichia coli<i> isolates United States of America None 10494 10494 Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Dry Rolled Corn Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Dry Rolled Corn Inclusion of WDG No WDG Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 18 18 None None None None None
12489 12489 10172 None 9010 10.1089/fpd.2009.0417 Edrington2010 Influence of wet distiller's grains on prevalence of <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157:H7 and <i>Salmonella</> in feedlot cattle and antimicrobial susceptibility of generic <i>Escherichia coli<i> isolates United States of America None 10495 10495 Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Steam Flaked Corn Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Steam Flaked Corn Inclusion of WDG No WDG Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 18 18 None None None None None
12491 12491 10172 None 9010 10.1089/fpd.2009.0417 Edrington2010 Influence of wet distiller's grains on prevalence of <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157:H7 and <i>Salmonella</> in feedlot cattle and antimicrobial susceptibility of generic <i>Escherichia coli<i> isolates United States of America None 10495 10495 Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Steam Flaked Corn Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Steam Flaked Corn Inclusion of WDG No WDG Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 18 18 None None None None None
12492 12492 10172 None 9010 10.1089/fpd.2009.0417 Edrington2010 Influence of wet distiller's grains on prevalence of <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157:H7 and <i>Salmonella</> in feedlot cattle and antimicrobial susceptibility of generic <i>Escherichia coli<i> isolates United States of America None 10494 10494 Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Dry Rolled Corn Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Dry Rolled Corn Inclusion of WDG No WDG Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 18 18 None None None None None
12493 12493 10172 None 9010 10.1089/fpd.2009.0417 Edrington2010 Influence of wet distiller's grains on prevalence of <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157:H7 and <i>Salmonella</> in feedlot cattle and antimicrobial susceptibility of generic <i>Escherichia coli<i> isolates United States of America None 10495 10495 Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Steam Flaked Corn Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Steam Flaked Corn Inclusion of WDG No WDG Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 18 18 None None None None None
12494 12494 10172 None 9010 10.1089/fpd.2009.0417 Edrington2010 Influence of wet distiller's grains on prevalence of <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157:H7 and <i>Salmonella</> in feedlot cattle and antimicrobial susceptibility of generic <i>Escherichia coli<i> isolates United States of America None 10494 10494 Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Dry Rolled Corn Inclusion of Wet Distiller's Grains (WDG) in diet containing Dry Rolled Corn Inclusion of WDG No WDG Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 18 18 None None None None None
12495 12495 10036 None 11115 10.4315/0362-028x-67.7.1433 LeJeune2004 Microbiological quality of ground beef from conventionally-reared cattle and raised without antibiotics label claims United States of America Experimental 10082 10082 Production Type None ABF (Natural) Conventional Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 12.30 None 29.90 None 73 77 None None None 0.01 None
12496 12496 10036 None 11115 10.4315/0362-028x-67.7.1433 LeJeune2004 Microbiological quality of ground beef from conventionally-reared cattle and raised without antibiotics label claims United States of America Experimental 10082 10082 Production Type None ABF (Natural) Conventional Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.70 None 0.00 None 73 77 None None None 0.14 None
12497 12497 10036 None 11115 10.4315/0362-028x-67.7.1433 LeJeune2004 Microbiological quality of ground beef from conventionally-reared cattle and raised without antibiotics label claims United States of America Experimental 10082 10082 Production Type None ABF (Natural) Conventional Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 12.30 None 7.80 None 73 77 None None None 0.34 None
12498 12498 10036 None 11115 10.4315/0362-028x-67.7.1433 LeJeune2004 Microbiological quality of ground beef from conventionally-reared cattle and raised without antibiotics label claims United States of America Experimental 10082 10082 Production Type None ABF (Natural) Conventional Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 16.40 None 20.10 None 73 77 None None None 0.47 None
12499 12499 10036 None 11115 10.4315/0362-028x-67.7.1433 LeJeune2004 Microbiological quality of ground beef from conventionally-reared cattle and raised without antibiotics label claims United States of America Experimental 10082 10082 Production Type None ABF (Natural) Conventional Cattle Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.40 None 2.60 None 73 77 None None None 0.59 None
12500 12500 10395 None 60005 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Carson et al. (2008) Antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli from 29 beef farms in Ontario Canada Observational 11089 11089 Production Stage None Feedlot Beef Operation Cow-Calf Operation Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 993 807 None None None None None
12501 12501 10395 None 60005 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Carson et al. (2008) Antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli from 29 beef farms in Ontario Canada Observational 11089 11089 Production Stage None Feedlot Beef Operation Cow-Calf Operation Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.90 None 1.50 None 993 807 None None None None None
12502 12502 10395 None 60005 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Carson et al. (2008) Antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli from 29 beef farms in Ontario Canada Observational 11089 11089 Production Stage None Feedlot Beef Operation Cow-Calf Operation Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 15.40 None 6.90 None 993 807 None None None None None
12503 12503 10395 None 60005 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Carson et al. (2008) Antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli from 29 beef farms in Ontario Canada Observational 11089 11089 Production Stage None Feedlot Beef Operation Cow-Calf Operation Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.30 None 2.50 None 993 807 None None None None None
12504 12504 10395 None 60005 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Carson et al. (2008) Antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli from 29 beef farms in Ontario Canada Observational 11089 11089 Production Stage None Feedlot Beef Operation Cow-Calf Operation Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.60 None 1.20 None 993 807 None None None None None
12505 12505 10395 None 60005 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.10.002 Carson et al. (2008) Antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli from 29 beef farms in Ontario Canada Observational 11089 11089 Production Stage None Feedlot Beef Operation Cow-Calf Operation Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 16.10 None 6.80 None 993 807 None None None None None
12506 12506 10268 None 8372 Checkley_2008_CaJoofVeRe Antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli obtained from beef cattle on arrival at the feedlot and prior to slaughter, and associations with volume of total individual cattle antimicrobial treatments in one western Canadian feedlot Canada None 10806 10806 Antimicrobial Use for Disease Antimicrobial Use for Disease Antimicrobials used for Disease Treatment No Antimicrobials used for Disease Treatment Cattle Backgrounders None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 24 None 22 None None None None None 42 53 None None None None None
12507 12507 10268 None 8372 Checkley_2008_CaJoofVeRe Antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli obtained from beef cattle on arrival at the feedlot and prior to slaughter, and associations with volume of total individual cattle antimicrobial treatments in one western Canadian feedlot Canada None 10806 10806 Antimicrobial Use for Disease Antimicrobial Use for Disease Antimicrobials used for Disease Treatment No Antimicrobials used for Disease Treatment Cattle Backgrounders None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 34 None 38 None None None None None 42 53 None None None None None
12508 12508 10268 None 8372 Checkley_2008_CaJoofVeRe Antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli obtained from beef cattle on arrival at the feedlot and prior to slaughter, and associations with volume of total individual cattle antimicrobial treatments in one western Canadian feedlot Canada None 10806 10806 Antimicrobial Use for Disease Antimicrobial Use for Disease Antimicrobials used for Disease Treatment No Antimicrobials used for Disease Treatment Cattle Backgrounders None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 6 None None None None None 42 53 None None None None None
12509 12509 10268 None 8372 Checkley_2008_CaJoofVeRe Antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli obtained from beef cattle on arrival at the feedlot and prior to slaughter, and associations with volume of total individual cattle antimicrobial treatments in one western Canadian feedlot Canada None 10806 10806 Antimicrobial Use for Disease Antimicrobial Use for Disease Antimicrobials used for Disease Treatment No Antimicrobials used for Disease Treatment Cattle Backgrounders None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 42 53 None None None None None
12510 12510 10268 None 8372 Checkley_2008_CaJoofVeRe Antimicrobial resistance in generic fecal Escherichia coli obtained from beef cattle on arrival at the feedlot and prior to slaughter, and associations with volume of total individual cattle antimicrobial treatments in one western Canadian feedlot Canada None 10806 10806 Antimicrobial Use for Disease Antimicrobial Use for Disease Antimicrobials used for Disease Treatment No Antimicrobials used for Disease Treatment Cattle Backgrounders None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 3 None None None None None 42 53 None None None None None
12511 12511 20035 None 9756 10.1089/fpd.2008.0171 Han2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. in Louisiana retail chickens after the enrofloxacin ban United States of America Observational 11290 11290 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 48 117 None None None None None
12512 12512 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11141 11141 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter Combination False None False 0 None 77 None None None None None 165 167 None None None None None
12513 12513 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11141 11141 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 5 None 0 None None None None None 165 167 None None None None None
12514 12514 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11141 11141 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 165 167 None None None None None
12515 12515 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11141 11141 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 28 None 19 None None None None None 165 167 None None None None None
12516 12516 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11141 11141 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Lincosamides clindamycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 9 None 2 None None None None None 165 167 None None None None None
12517 12517 10069 None 11884 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01023.x Moro2000 Effects of heat stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10188 10188 Heat Stress Exposure to temperatures of 34 degrees celcius, at 65% humidity, for 24 hours. Measured via fecal sample. Stress Pre-stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Abattoir Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False 75 None 30 None None None None None 100 100 None None None None None
12518 12518 10069 None 11884 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01023.x Moro2000 Effects of heat stress on the antimicrobial drug resistance of Escherichia coli of the intestinal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10188 10188 Heat Stress Exposure to temperatures of 34 degrees celcius, at 65% humidity, for 24 hours. Measured via fecal sample. Stress Pre-stress Swine Grower-finisher None None Abattoir Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 40 None 0 None None None None None 100 100 None None None None None
12519 12519 10086 None 12445 10.1371/journal.pone.0115223 Pereira2014b In Vivo Selection of Resistant E. coli after Ingestion of Milk with Added Drug Residues United States of America None 10234 10234 Drug Residues in Milk Drug residues included ceftiofur, penicillin, ampicillin, and oxytetracycline at concentrations of 0.1, 0.005, 0.01, and 0.3 mg/ml, respectively. Milk fed with Drug Residues Milk fed without Drug Residues Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 1.00 None 270 270 None None None None None
12520 12520 10086 None 12445 10.1371/journal.pone.0115223 Pereira2014b In Vivo Selection of Resistant E. coli after Ingestion of Milk with Added Drug Residues United States of America None 10234 10234 Drug Residues in Milk Drug residues included ceftiofur, penicillin, ampicillin, and oxytetracycline at concentrations of 0.1, 0.005, 0.01, and 0.3 mg/ml, respectively. Milk fed with Drug Residues Milk fed without Drug Residues Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 12.00 None 12.00 None 270 270 None None None None None
12521 12521 10086 None 12445 10.1371/journal.pone.0115223 Pereira2014b In Vivo Selection of Resistant E. coli after Ingestion of Milk with Added Drug Residues United States of America None 10234 10234 Drug Residues in Milk Drug residues included ceftiofur, penicillin, ampicillin, and oxytetracycline at concentrations of 0.1, 0.005, 0.01, and 0.3 mg/ml, respectively. Milk fed with Drug Residues Milk fed without Drug Residues Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 21.00 None 13.00 None 270 270 None None None None None
12522 12522 10086 None 12445 10.1371/journal.pone.0115223 Pereira2014b In Vivo Selection of Resistant E. coli after Ingestion of Milk with Added Drug Residues United States of America None 10234 10234 Drug Residues in Milk Drug residues included ceftiofur, penicillin, ampicillin, and oxytetracycline at concentrations of 0.1, 0.005, 0.01, and 0.3 mg/ml, respectively. Milk fed with Drug Residues Milk fed without Drug Residues Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 49.00 None 31.00 None 270 270 None None None None None
12523 12523 10086 None 12445 10.1371/journal.pone.0115223 Pereira2014b In Vivo Selection of Resistant E. coli after Ingestion of Milk with Added Drug Residues United States of America None 10234 10234 Drug Residues in Milk Drug residues included ceftiofur, penicillin, ampicillin, and oxytetracycline at concentrations of 0.1, 0.005, 0.01, and 0.3 mg/ml, respectively. Milk fed with Drug Residues Milk fed without Drug Residues Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 15.00 None 10.00 None 270 270 None None None None None
12524 12524 10083 None 12442 10.3168/jds.2014-8521 Pereira2014 Effect of on-farm use of antimicrobial drugs on resistance in fecal Escherichia coli of preweaned dairy calves United States of America None 10231 10231 Enrofloxacin Use Use defined as one at least one treatment with enrofloxacin from birth to sampling. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 35.00 None 32.00 None 152 1271 None None None <0.0001 None
12525 12525 10083 None 12442 10.3168/jds.2014-8521 Pereira2014 Effect of on-farm use of antimicrobial drugs on resistance in fecal Escherichia coli of preweaned dairy calves United States of America None 10230 10230 Ceftiofur Use Use defined as one at least one treatment with enrofloxacin from birth to sampling. Ceftiofur Use No Use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 38.00 None 32.00 None 144 1279 None None None 0.05 None
12526 12526 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11104 11104 Heifer-raiser Type Heifer-raiser Type Multi-source Heifer Raiser Single (Home) Farm Heifer Raiser Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.00 None 1.00 None 429 429 None None None 0.1 None
12527 12527 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11104 11104 Heifer-raiser Type Heifer-raiser Type Multi-source Heifer Raiser Single (Home) Farm Heifer Raiser Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.00 None 3.00 None 429 429 None None None 0.7 None
12528 12528 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11104 11104 Heifer-raiser Type Heifer-raiser Type Multi-source Heifer Raiser Single (Home) Farm Heifer Raiser Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 12.00 None 9.00 None 429 429 None None None 0.6 None
12529 12529 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11104 11104 Heifer-raiser Type Heifer-raiser Type Multi-source Heifer Raiser Single (Home) Farm Heifer Raiser Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.00 None 0.20 None 429 429 None None None 0.06 None
12530 12530 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11106 11106 Logistical Status at Heifer-raiser Logistical Status at Heifer-raiser Recent Arrival (< 2 mo.) to Heifer Raiser Approaching Departure from Heifer Raiser (2 - 3 mo.) Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.00 None 0.50 None 428 430 None None None 0.3 None
12531 12531 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11106 11106 Logistical Status at Heifer-raiser Logistical Status at Heifer-raiser Recent Arrival (< 2 mo.) to Heifer Raiser Approaching Departure from Heifer Raiser (2 - 3 mo.) Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.00 None 0.20 None 428 430 None None None 0.007 None
12532 12532 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11106 11106 Logistical Status at Heifer-raiser Logistical Status at Heifer-raiser Recent Arrival (< 2 mo.) to Heifer Raiser Approaching Departure from Heifer Raiser (2 - 3 mo.) Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 17.00 None 4.00 None 428 430 None None None 0.01 None
12533 12533 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11106 11106 Logistical Status at Heifer-raiser Logistical Status at Heifer-raiser Recent Arrival (< 2 mo.) to Heifer Raiser Approaching Departure from Heifer Raiser (2 - 3 mo.) Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.00 None 1.00 None 428 430 None None None 0.8 None
12534 12534 10084 None 12443 10.3168/jds.2014-8588 Pereira2014a Effect of preweaned dairy calf housing system on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli United States of America None 10232 10232 Housing System None Individual Pens (Non-acidified Milk) Group Pens (Acidified Milk) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 36.00 None 35.00 None 903 1057 None None None 0.8 None
12535 12535 10084 None 12443 10.3168/jds.2014-8588 Pereira2014a Effect of preweaned dairy calf housing system on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli United States of America None 10232 10232 Housing System None Individual Pens (Non-acidified Milk) Group Pens (Acidified Milk) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 16.00 None 4.00 None 903 1057 None None None 0.03 None
12536 12536 10084 None 12443 10.3168/jds.2014-8588 Pereira2014a Effect of preweaned dairy calf housing system on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli United States of America None 10232 10232 Housing System None Individual Pens (Non-acidified Milk) Group Pens (Acidified Milk) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 32.00 None 32.00 None 903 1057 None None None 0.6 None
12537 12537 10084 None 12443 10.3168/jds.2014-8588 Pereira2014a Effect of preweaned dairy calf housing system on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli United States of America None 10232 10232 Housing System None Individual Pens (Non-acidified Milk) Group Pens (Acidified Milk) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 70.00 None 58.00 None 903 1057 None None None <0.0001 None
12538 12538 10084 None 12443 10.3168/jds.2014-8588 Pereira2014a Effect of preweaned dairy calf housing system on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli United States of America None 10232 10232 Housing System None Individual Pens (Non-acidified Milk) Group Pens (Acidified Milk) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 33.00 None 37.00 None 903 1057 None None None 0.1 None
12539 12539 10091 None 12742 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-11-469 Rasschaert2012 Effect of farm type on within-herd Salmonella prevalence, serovar distribution, and antimicrobial resistance Belgium Observational 10249 10249 Farm Type Farm Type Open Farm (Grow-to-Finish) Closed Farm (Farrow-to-Finish) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 7 None 2 None None None None None 125 83 None None None None None
12540 12540 10091 None 12742 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-11-469 Rasschaert2012 Effect of farm type on within-herd Salmonella prevalence, serovar distribution, and antimicrobial resistance Belgium Observational 10249 10249 Farm Type Farm Type Open Farm (Grow-to-Finish) Closed Farm (Farrow-to-Finish) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Lincosamides lincomycin, combinations None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 7 None 0 None None None None None 125 83 None None None None None
12541 12541 10091 None 12742 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-11-469 Rasschaert2012 Effect of farm type on within-herd Salmonella prevalence, serovar distribution, and antimicrobial resistance Belgium Observational 10249 10249 Farm Type Farm Type Open Farm (Grow-to-Finish) Closed Farm (Farrow-to-Finish) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 80 None 25 None None None None None 125 83 None None None None None
12542 12542 10091 None 12742 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-11-469 Rasschaert2012 Effect of farm type on within-herd Salmonella prevalence, serovar distribution, and antimicrobial resistance Belgium Observational 10249 10249 Farm Type Farm Type Open Farm (Grow-to-Finish) Closed Farm (Farrow-to-Finish) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 78 None 24 None None None None None 125 83 None None None None None
12543 12543 10091 None 12742 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-11-469 Rasschaert2012 Effect of farm type on within-herd Salmonella prevalence, serovar distribution, and antimicrobial resistance Belgium Observational 10249 10249 Farm Type Farm Type Open Farm (Grow-to-Finish) Closed Farm (Farrow-to-Finish) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 71 None 2 None None None None None 125 83 None None None None None
12544 12544 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11241 11241 Production Type None Antimicrobial Free Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 174 290 None None None None None
12554 12554 10256 None 8117 10.2460/javma.231.2.275 Bunner_2007_JoofthAmVeMeAs Prevalence and pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods United States of America None 10776 10776 Production Type None Antimicrobial Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 72 None None None None None 498 883 None None None 0.003 None
12555 12555 10256 None 8117 10.2460/javma.231.2.275 Bunner_2007_JoofthAmVeMeAs Prevalence and pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods United States of America None 10776 10776 Production Type None Antimicrobial Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 7 None None None None None 498 883 None None None 0.201 None
12556 12556 10256 None 8117 10.2460/javma.231.2.275 Bunner_2007_JoofthAmVeMeAs Prevalence and pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods United States of America None 10776 10776 Production Type None Antimicrobial Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False 78 None 178 None None None None None 498 883 None None None 0.174 None
12557 12557 10256 None 8117 10.2460/javma.231.2.275 Bunner_2007_JoofthAmVeMeAs Prevalence and pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods United States of America None 10776 10776 Production Type None Antimicrobial Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 104 None 255 None None None None None 498 883 None None None 0.018 None
12558 12558 10256 None 8117 10.2460/javma.231.2.275 Bunner_2007_JoofthAmVeMeAs Prevalence and pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods United States of America None 10776 10776 Production Type None Antimicrobial Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False 109 None 279 None None None None None 498 883 None None None 0.008 None
12559 12559 10256 None 8117 10.2460/javma.231.2.275 Bunner_2007_JoofthAmVeMeAs Prevalence and pattern of antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods United States of America None 10776 10776 Production Type None Antimicrobial Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 17 None None None None None 498 883 None None None 0.139 None
12560 12560 10258 None 8181 10.1089/mdr.2014.0037 Callens_2015_MicrDrugResi Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring Belgium None 10782 10782 Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use in Parent Sow Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use No Use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 56.60 None 48.70 None 113 750 None None None <0.01 None
12561 12561 10258 None 8181 10.1089/mdr.2014.0037 Callens_2015_MicrDrugResi Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring Belgium None 10782 10782 Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use in Parent Sow Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use No Use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 19.50 None 7.50 None 113 750 None None None <0.05 None
40211 40211 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11324 11324 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None Other aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
12562 12562 10258 None 8181 10.1089/mdr.2014.0037 Callens_2015_MicrDrugResi Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring Belgium None 10778 10778 Ceftiofur Use Ceftiofur Use in Piglet Ceftiofur Use No Use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 27.90 None 18.60 None 298 565 31.08 4.78 202.27 <0.01 None
12563 12563 10258 None 8181 10.1089/mdr.2014.0037 Callens_2015_MicrDrugResi Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring Belgium None 10783 10783 Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use in Parent Sow Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use No Use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 90.00 None 62.10 None 60 234 None None None <0.0001 None
12564 12564 10258 None 8181 10.1089/mdr.2014.0037 Callens_2015_MicrDrugResi Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring Belgium None 10782 10782 Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use in Parent Sow Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use No Use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 79.60 None 49.70 None 113 750 None None None <0.05 None
12565 12565 10258 None 8181 10.1089/mdr.2014.0037 Callens_2015_MicrDrugResi Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring Belgium None 10783 10783 Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use in Parent Sow Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use No Use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfadiazine and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 26.70 None 18.90 None 60 234 None None None <0.0001 None
12566 12566 10258 None 8181 10.1089/mdr.2014.0037 Callens_2015_MicrDrugResi Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring Belgium None 10778 10778 Ceftiofur Use Ceftiofur Use in Piglet Ceftiofur Use No Use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfadiazine and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 26.80 None 12.40 None 298 565 None None None <0.0001 None
12567 12567 10258 None 8181 10.1089/mdr.2014.0037 Callens_2015_MicrDrugResi Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring Belgium None 10781 10781 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin Use in Piglet Enrofloxacin Use No Use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfadiazine and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 40.50 None 22.50 None 42 821 None None None <0.01 None
12568 12568 10258 None 8181 10.1089/mdr.2014.0037 Callens_2015_MicrDrugResi Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring Belgium None 10782 10782 Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use in Parent Sow Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use No Use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfadiazine and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 29.20 None 22.50 None 113 750 None None None <0.05 None
12569 12569 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10517 10517 Production Type Production Type Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False 30 None 22 None None None None None 282 85 None None None <0.01 None
12570 12570 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10517 10517 Production Type Production Type Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 282 85 None None None N/A None
12571 12571 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10517 10517 Production Type Production Type Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 4 None 16 None None None None None 282 85 None None None <0.001 None
12572 12572 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10517 10517 Production Type Production Type Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 102 None 73 None None None None None 282 85 None None None <0.0001 None
12573 12573 10194 None 9441 10.4315/0362-028x-69.4.743 Gebreyes2006 Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production United States of America Observational 10517 10517 Production Type Production Type Antibiotic Free Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella spp. False None False 85 None 55 None None None None None 282 85 None None None <0.0001 None
12574 12574 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10258 10258 Aminoglycoside Use (past 12 mo.) [Suckling Pigs] Aminoglycoside Use (past 12 mo.) [Suckling Pigs] Aminoglycoside Use No Aminoglycoside Use Swine None None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.30 1.20 4.60 0.02 None
12575 12575 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10268 10268 Macrolide Use (past 12 mo.) Macrolide Use (past 12 mo.) High Macrolide Use No Macrolide Use Swine None None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 5.90 2.20 16.00 0.04 None
12576 12576 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10269 10269 Macrolide Use (past 12 mo.) Macrolide Use (past 12 mo.) Low Macrolide Use No Macrolide Use Swine None None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.40 0.60 3.40 NR None
12577 12577 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10268 10268 Macrolide Use (past 12 mo.) Macrolide Use (past 12 mo.) High Macrolide Use No Macrolide Use Swine None None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 6.00 3.60 10.00 NR None
12578 12578 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10269 10269 Macrolide Use (past 12 mo.) Macrolide Use (past 12 mo.) Low Macrolide Use No Macrolide Use Swine None None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.30 1.40 3.90 NR None
12579 12579 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10257 10257 Aminoglycoside Use (past 12 mo.) [Nursery Pigs] Aminoglycoside Use (past 12 mo.) [Nursery Pigs] Aminoglycoside Use No Aminoglycoside Use Swine None None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.60 1.40 4.70 0.002 None
12580 12580 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10270 10270 Macrolide Use (past 12 mo.) [Sows] Macrolide Use (past 12 mo.) [Sows] Macrolide Use No Macrolide Use Swine None None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.90 1.60 9.60 0.003 None
12581 12581 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10272 10272 Sulfonamide Use (past 12 mo.) [Nursery Pigs] Sulfonamide Use (past 12 mo.) [Nursery Pigs] Sulfonamide Use No Sulfonamide Use Swine None None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.60 2.00 10.50 0.0004 None
12582 12582 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10260 10260 Beta-Lactam Use Beta-Lactam Use Beta-Lactam Use No Beta-Lactam Use Swine None None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 7.90 2.80 21.00 <0.0001 None
12583 12583 10098 None 12918 10.1089/mdr.2007.781 Rosengren2007 Associations between feed and water antimicrobial use in farrow-to-finish swine herds and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from grow-finish pigs Canada Observational 10262 10262 Herd Type Herd Type Commercial Breeding Stock Swine None None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.60 1.58 4.90 <0.004 None
12584 12584 10077 None 12132 10.1080/00480169.2008.36801 Nulsen2008 Antibiotic resistance among indicator bacteria isolated from healthy pigs in New Zealand New Zealand Experimental 10218 10218 Production Type Production Type Organic (ABF) Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 6 None None None None None 47 157 None None None None None
12585 12585 10077 None 12132 10.1080/00480169.2008.36801 Nulsen2008 Antibiotic resistance among indicator bacteria isolated from healthy pigs in New Zealand New Zealand Experimental 10218 10218 Production Type Production Type Organic (ABF) Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 47 157 None None None None None
12586 12586 10077 None 12132 10.1080/00480169.2008.36801 Nulsen2008 Antibiotic resistance among indicator bacteria isolated from healthy pigs in New Zealand New Zealand Experimental 10218 10218 Production Type Production Type Organic (ABF) Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 15 None None None None None 47 157 None None None None None
12587 12587 10077 None 12132 10.1080/00480169.2008.36801 Nulsen2008 Antibiotic resistance among indicator bacteria isolated from healthy pigs in New Zealand New Zealand Experimental 10218 10218 Production Type Production Type Organic (ABF) Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 47 157 None None None None None
12588 12588 10077 None 12132 10.1080/00480169.2008.36801 Nulsen2008 Antibiotic resistance among indicator bacteria isolated from healthy pigs in New Zealand New Zealand Experimental 10218 10218 Production Type Production Type Organic (ABF) Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 2 None None None None None 47 157 None None None None None
12589 12589 10077 None 12132 10.1080/00480169.2008.36801 Nulsen2008 Antibiotic resistance among indicator bacteria isolated from healthy pigs in New Zealand New Zealand Experimental 10218 10218 Production Type Production Type Organic (ABF) Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 39 None None None None None 47 157 None None None None None
12590 12590 10077 None 12132 10.1080/00480169.2008.36801 Nulsen2008 Antibiotic resistance among indicator bacteria isolated from healthy pigs in New Zealand New Zealand Experimental 10218 10218 Production Type Production Type Organic (ABF) Conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 96 None None None None None 47 157 None None None None None
12591 12591 10332 None 13707 10.1089/fpd.2010.0665 Tadesse_2011_FooPatandDis Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Campylobacter Spp. Isolated from conventional and antimicrobial-free swine production systems from different U.S. regions United States of America Observational 10987 10987 Production Type Production Type [at Finishing] Conventional ABF Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False 6 None 12 None None None None None 490 446 None None None None None
12592 12592 10332 None 13707 10.1089/fpd.2010.0665 Tadesse_2011_FooPatandDis Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Campylobacter Spp. Isolated from conventional and antimicrobial-free swine production systems from different U.S. regions United States of America Observational 10986 10986 Production Type Production Type [at Finishing] ABF Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False 21 None 17 None None None None None 490 446 None None None None None
12593 12593 10332 None 13707 10.1089/fpd.2010.0665 Tadesse_2011_FooPatandDis Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Campylobacter Spp. Isolated from conventional and antimicrobial-free swine production systems from different U.S. regions United States of America Observational 10989 10989 Production Type Production Type [at Post-Chill] ABF Conventional Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 12 17 None None None None None
12594 12594 10332 None 13707 10.1089/fpd.2010.0665 Tadesse_2011_FooPatandDis Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance profile of Campylobacter Spp. Isolated from conventional and antimicrobial-free swine production systems from different U.S. regions United States of America Observational 10989 10989 Production Type Production Type [at Post-Chill] ABF Conventional Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 12 17 None None None None None
12595 12595 10123 None 13829 10.4315/0362-028x-68.11.2402 Thakur2005 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production systems United States of America Observational 10347 10347 Production Type Combined observations at nursery and finishing [on farm]. ABF Conventional Swine Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter coli False None False 9 None 8 None None None None None 660 450 None None None None None
12596 12596 10123 None 13829 10.4315/0362-028x-68.11.2402 Thakur2005 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production systems United States of America Observational 10347 10347 Production Type Combined observations at nursery and finishing [on farm]. ABF Conventional Swine Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 4 None 13 None None None None None 660 450 None None None None None
12597 12597 10123 None 13829 10.4315/0362-028x-68.11.2402 Thakur2005 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production systems United States of America Observational 10347 10347 Production Type Combined observations at nursery and finishing [on farm]. ABF Conventional Swine Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 228 None 347 None None None None None 660 450 None None None None None
12598 12598 10123 None 13829 10.4315/0362-028x-68.11.2402 Thakur2005 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production systems United States of America Observational 10347 10347 Production Type Combined observations at nursery and finishing [on farm]. ABF Conventional Swine Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 4 None None None None None 660 450 None None None None None
12599 12599 10123 None 13829 10.4315/0362-028x-68.11.2402 Thakur2005 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production systems United States of America Observational 10347 10347 Production Type Combined observations at nursery and finishing [on farm]. ABF Conventional Swine Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter coli False None False 54 None 33 None None None None None 660 450 None None None None None
12600 12600 10123 None 13829 10.4315/0362-028x-68.11.2402 Thakur2005 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production systems United States of America Observational 10347 10347 Production Type Combined observations at nursery and finishing [on farm]. ABF Conventional Swine Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False 373 None 375 None None None None None 660 450 None None None None None
12601 12601 10123 None 13829 10.4315/0362-028x-68.11.2402 Thakur2005 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production systems United States of America Observational 10348 10348 Production Type Combined observations at pre- and post-evisceration, and post-chill [at slaughter]. ABF Conventional Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter coli False None False 2 None 8 None None None None None 166 183 None None None None None
12602 12602 10123 None 13829 10.4315/0362-028x-68.11.2402 Thakur2005 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production systems United States of America Observational 10348 10348 Production Type Combined observations at pre- and post-evisceration, and post-chill [at slaughter]. ABF Conventional Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 166 183 None None None None None
12603 12603 10123 None 13829 10.4315/0362-028x-68.11.2402 Thakur2005 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production systems United States of America Observational 10348 10348 Production Type Combined observations at pre- and post-evisceration, and post-chill [at slaughter]. ABF Conventional Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 67 None 149 None None None None None 166 183 None None None None None
12604 12604 10123 None 13829 10.4315/0362-028x-68.11.2402 Thakur2005 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production systems United States of America Observational 10348 10348 Production Type Combined observations at pre- and post-evisceration, and post-chill [at slaughter]. ABF Conventional Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter coli False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 166 183 None None None None None
12605 12605 10123 None 13829 10.4315/0362-028x-68.11.2402 Thakur2005 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production systems United States of America Observational 10348 10348 Production Type Combined observations at pre- and post-evisceration, and post-chill [at slaughter]. ABF Conventional Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter coli False None False 1 None 3 None None None None None 166 183 None None None None None
12606 12606 10123 None 13829 10.4315/0362-028x-68.11.2402 Thakur2005 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production systems United States of America Observational 10348 10348 Production Type Combined observations at pre- and post-evisceration, and post-chill [at slaughter]. ABF Conventional Swine Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False 61 None 147 None None None None None 166 183 None None None None None
12607 12607 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 3 10 None None None None None
12608 12608 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 14 10 None None None None None
12609 12609 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10376 10376 Continuous CTC Use Period 2. Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 11 10 None None None None None
12610 12610 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 10 None None None None None
12611 12611 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 3 10 None None None None None
12612 12612 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10376 10376 Continuous CTC Use Period 2. Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 11 10 None None None None None
12613 12613 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 14 10 None None None None None
12614 12614 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 10 None None None None None
12615 12615 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 3 10 None None None None None
12616 12616 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10376 10376 Continuous CTC Use Period 2. Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 11 10 None None None None None
12617 12617 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 14 10 None None None None None
12618 12618 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 10 None None None None None
12619 12619 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 3 10 None None None None None
12620 12620 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10376 10376 Continuous CTC Use Period 2. Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 11 10 None None None None None
12621 12621 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 14 10 None None None None None
12622 12622 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 10 None None None None None
12623 12623 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 3 10 None None None None None
12624 12624 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10376 10376 Continuous CTC Use Period 2. Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 11 10 None None None None None
12625 12625 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 14 10 None None None None None
12626 12626 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 10 None None None None None
12627 12627 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 3 10 None None None None None
12628 12628 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10376 10376 Continuous CTC Use Period 2. Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 11 10 None None None None None
12629 12629 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 14 10 None None None None None
12630 12630 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 10 None None None None None
12631 12631 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 3 10 None None None None None
12632 12632 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10376 10376 Continuous CTC Use Period 2. Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 11 10 None None None None None
12633 12633 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 35.70 None 0.00 None 14 10 None None None None None
12634 12634 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 10.00 None 0.00 None 30 10 None None None None None
12635 12635 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 10.00 None 3 10 None None None None None
12636 12636 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10376 10376 Continuous CTC Use Period 2. Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 10.00 None 11 10 None None None None None
12637 12637 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 10.00 None 14 10 None None None None None
12638 12638 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 0.00 None 10.00 None 30 10 None None None None None
12639 12639 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 66.70 None 100.00 None 3 10 None None None None None
12640 12640 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10376 10376 Continuous CTC Use Period 2. Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 90.90 None 100.00 None 11 10 None None None None None
12641 12641 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 85.70 None 100.00 None 14 10 None None None None None
12642 12642 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 30 10 None None None None None
12643 12643 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 66.70 None 90.00 None 3 10 None None None None None
12644 12644 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10376 10376 Continuous CTC Use Period 2. Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 81.80 None 90.00 None 11 10 None None None None None
12645 12645 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 85.70 None 90.00 None 14 10 None None None None None
12646 12646 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False None None None None 100.00 None 90.00 None 30 10 None None None None None
12647 12647 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 150 128 None None None None None
12648 12648 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10375 10375 Continuous CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 126 128 None None None None None
12649 12649 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 150 128 None None None None None
12650 12650 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 146 128 None None None None None
12651 12651 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 150 128 None None None None None
12652 12652 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10375 10375 Continuous CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 126 128 None None None None None
12653 12653 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 150 128 None None None None None
12654 12654 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 146 128 None None None None None
12655 12655 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 150 128 None None None None None
12656 12656 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10375 10375 Continuous CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 126 128 None None None None None
12657 12657 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 150 128 None None None None None
12658 12658 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 146 128 None None None None None
12659 12659 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 150 128 None None None None None
12660 12660 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10375 10375 Continuous CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 126 128 None None None None None
12661 12661 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 150 128 None None None None None
12662 12662 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 146 128 None None None None None
12663 12663 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 6.00 None 10.20 None 150 128 None None None None None
12664 12664 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10375 10375 Continuous CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 8.70 None 10.20 None 126 128 None None None None None
12665 12665 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 12.00 None 10.20 None 150 128 None None None None None
12666 12666 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.50 None 10.20 None 146 128 None None None None None
12667 12667 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.00 None 6.20 None 150 128 None None None None None
12668 12668 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10375 10375 Continuous CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 9.50 None 6.20 None 126 128 None None None None None
12669 12669 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 6.00 None 6.20 None 150 128 None None None None None
12670 12670 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.70 None 6.20 None 146 128 None None None None None
12671 12671 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 28.00 None 20.30 None 150 128 None None None None None
12672 12672 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10375 10375 Continuous CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 23.80 None 20.30 None 126 128 None None None None None
12673 12673 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 35.30 None 20.30 None 150 128 None None None None None
12674 12674 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 26.70 None 20.30 None 146 128 None None None None None
12675 12675 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 25.30 None 17.20 None 150 128 None None None None None
12676 12676 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10375 10375 Continuous CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 34.90 None 17.20 None 126 128 None None None None None
12677 12677 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 34.70 None 17.20 None 150 128 None None None None None
12678 12678 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 26.70 None 17.20 None 146 128 None None None None None
12679 12679 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 38.00 None 18.80 None 150 128 None None None None None
12680 12680 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10375 10375 Continuous CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 28.60 None 18.80 None 126 128 None None None None None
12681 12681 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 40.00 None 18.80 None 150 128 None None None None None
12682 12682 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 24.00 None 18.80 None 146 128 None None None None None
12683 12683 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10377 10377 Continuous Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 40 g/ton continuously, for the entire time the pigs were in the finishing barn (17 weeks). Continuous Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.30 None 0.80 None 150 128 None None None None None
12684 12684 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10375 10375 Continuous CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 100 g/ton continuously throughout the finishing period, until 2 weeks prior to marketing. Continuous CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.60 None 0.80 None 126 128 None None None None None
12685 12685 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10380 10380 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin was fed at 100 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed Tylosin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.70 None 0.80 None 150 128 None None None None None
12686 12686 10130 None 14173 10.1128/aem.01132-07 Wagner2008 Effect of antimicrobial dosage regimen on Salmonella and Escherichia coli isolates from feeder swine United States of America Experimental 10379 10379 Pulsed CTC Use Chlortetracycline was fed at 400 g/ton in a pulsed fashion: 1wk+, 3wk-, 1wk+, 12wk-. Pulsed CTC Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.40 None 0.80 None 146 128 None None None None None
12687 12687 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10647 10647 CTC Use Chlortetracycline Use (550 mg/kg of feed) CTC Use No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 96 96 None None None <0.001 None
12688 12688 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10650 10650 Elevated Copper Supplementation Elevated Copper Supplementation (125 mg/kg of feed) vs 16.5 ppm Elevated Copper Supplementation Standard Copper Supplementation Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 96 96 None None None None None
12689 12689 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10648 10648 Elevated Copper and CTC Use Elevated Copper and Chlortetracycline Use (125 mg/kg of feed vs 16.5 ppm; 550 mg/kg of feed) Elevated Copper and CTC Use Standard Copper and No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 96 96 None None None None None
12690 12690 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10647 10647 CTC Use Chlortetracycline Use (550 mg/kg of feed) CTC Use No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 96 96 None None None None None
12691 12691 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10650 10650 Elevated Copper Supplementation Elevated Copper Supplementation (125 mg/kg of feed) vs 16.5 ppm Elevated Copper Supplementation Standard Copper Supplementation Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 96 96 None None None None None
12692 12692 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10648 10648 Elevated Copper and CTC Use Elevated Copper and Chlortetracycline Use (125 mg/kg of feed vs 16.5 ppm; 550 mg/kg of feed) Elevated Copper and CTC Use Standard Copper and No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 96 96 None None None None None
12693 12693 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10647 10647 CTC Use Chlortetracycline Use (550 mg/kg of feed) CTC Use No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 96 96 None None None None None
12694 12694 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10650 10650 Elevated Copper Supplementation Elevated Copper Supplementation (125 mg/kg of feed) vs 16.5 ppm Elevated Copper Supplementation Standard Copper Supplementation Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 96 96 None None None None None
12695 12695 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10648 10648 Elevated Copper and CTC Use Elevated Copper and Chlortetracycline Use (125 mg/kg of feed vs 16.5 ppm; 550 mg/kg of feed) Elevated Copper and CTC Use Standard Copper and No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 96 96 None None None None None
12696 12696 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10647 10647 CTC Use Chlortetracycline Use (550 mg/kg of feed) CTC Use No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 36.50 None 40.60 None 96 96 None None None None None
12697 12697 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10650 10650 Elevated Copper Supplementation Elevated Copper Supplementation (125 mg/kg of feed) vs 16.5 ppm Elevated Copper Supplementation Standard Copper Supplementation Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 34.40 None 40.60 None 96 96 None None None None None
12698 12698 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10648 10648 Elevated Copper and CTC Use Elevated Copper and Chlortetracycline Use (125 mg/kg of feed vs 16.5 ppm; 550 mg/kg of feed) Elevated Copper and CTC Use Standard Copper and No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 38.50 None 40.60 None 96 96 None None None None None
12699 12699 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10647 10647 CTC Use Chlortetracycline Use (550 mg/kg of feed) CTC Use No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 33.30 None 37.50 None 96 96 None None None None None
12700 12700 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10650 10650 Elevated Copper Supplementation Elevated Copper Supplementation (125 mg/kg of feed) vs 16.5 ppm Elevated Copper Supplementation Standard Copper Supplementation Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 38.50 None 37.50 None 96 96 None None None None None
12701 12701 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10648 10648 Elevated Copper and CTC Use Elevated Copper and Chlortetracycline Use (125 mg/kg of feed vs 16.5 ppm; 550 mg/kg of feed) Elevated Copper and CTC Use Standard Copper and No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 41.70 None 37.50 None 96 96 None None None None None
12702 12702 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10647 10647 CTC Use Chlortetracycline Use (550 mg/kg of feed) CTC Use No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 42.70 None 34.40 None 96 96 None None None None None
12703 12703 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10650 10650 Elevated Copper Supplementation Elevated Copper Supplementation (125 mg/kg of feed) vs 16.5 ppm Elevated Copper Supplementation Standard Copper Supplementation Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 38.50 None 34.40 None 96 96 None None None None None
12704 12704 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10648 10648 Elevated Copper and CTC Use Elevated Copper and Chlortetracycline Use (125 mg/kg of feed vs 16.5 ppm; 550 mg/kg of feed) Elevated Copper and CTC Use Standard Copper and No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 20.80 None 34.40 None 96 96 None None None None None
12705 12705 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10647 10647 CTC Use Chlortetracycline Use (550 mg/kg of feed) CTC Use No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 63.50 None 71.90 None 96 96 None None None None None
12706 12706 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10650 10650 Elevated Copper Supplementation Elevated Copper Supplementation (125 mg/kg of feed) vs 16.5 ppm Elevated Copper Supplementation Standard Copper Supplementation Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 71.90 None 71.90 None 96 96 None None None None None
12707 12707 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10648 10648 Elevated Copper and CTC Use Elevated Copper and Chlortetracycline Use (125 mg/kg of feed vs 16.5 ppm; 550 mg/kg of feed) Elevated Copper and CTC Use Standard Copper and No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 66.70 None 71.90 None 96 96 None None None None None
12708 12708 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10647 10647 CTC Use Chlortetracycline Use (550 mg/kg of feed) CTC Use No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 85.40 None 89.60 None 96 96 None None None None None
12709 12709 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10650 10650 Elevated Copper Supplementation Elevated Copper Supplementation (125 mg/kg of feed) vs 16.5 ppm Elevated Copper Supplementation Standard Copper Supplementation Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 88.50 None 89.60 None 96 96 None None None None None
12710 12710 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10648 10648 Elevated Copper and CTC Use Elevated Copper and Chlortetracycline Use (125 mg/kg of feed vs 16.5 ppm; 550 mg/kg of feed) Elevated Copper and CTC Use Standard Copper and No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 85.40 None 89.60 None 96 96 None None None None None
12711 12711 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10647 10647 CTC Use Chlortetracycline Use (550 mg/kg of feed) CTC Use No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 12.50 None 3.10 None 96 96 None None None None None
12712 12712 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10650 10650 Elevated Copper Supplementation Elevated Copper Supplementation (125 mg/kg of feed) vs 16.5 ppm Elevated Copper Supplementation Standard Copper Supplementation Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 3.10 None 96 96 None None None None None
12713 12713 10225 None 7265 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.02.010 Agga_2014_PrevVeteMedi Effects of chlortetracycline and copper supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from weaned pigs United States of America Experimental 10648 10648 Elevated Copper and CTC Use Elevated Copper and Chlortetracycline Use (125 mg/kg of feed vs 16.5 ppm; 550 mg/kg of feed) Elevated Copper and CTC Use Standard Copper and No CTC Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 3.10 None 96 96 None None None None None
12714 12714 10229 None 7332 Akwar_2008_CaJoofVeRe_1 Associations of antimicrobial uses with antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from pigs on 47 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario and British Columbia Canada None 10654 10654 Carbadox Use Carbadox use at farm level Carbadox Use No Carbadox Use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 6.48 1.60 26.23 0.009 None
12715 12715 10229 None 7332 Akwar_2008_CaJoofVeRe_1 Associations of antimicrobial uses with antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from pigs on 47 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario and British Columbia Canada None 10656 10656 Lincomycin Use Lincomycin use at farm level Lincomycin Use No Lincomycin Use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.17 0.04 0.69 0.0137 None
12716 12716 10229 None 7332 Akwar_2008_CaJoofVeRe_1 Associations of antimicrobial uses with antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from pigs on 47 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario and British Columbia Canada None 10653 10653 AMU by Injection AMU by Injection AMU No AMU Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 5.72 1.57 20.83 0.008 None
12717 12717 10229 None 7332 Akwar_2008_CaJoofVeRe_1 Associations of antimicrobial uses with antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from pigs on 47 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario and British Columbia Canada None 10663 10663 Tetracycline Use Tetracycline use at farm level Tetracycline Use No Tetracycline Use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.33 0.11 1.00 0.0493 None
12718 12718 10229 None 7332 Akwar_2008_CaJoofVeRe_1 Associations of antimicrobial uses with antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from pigs on 47 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario and British Columbia Canada None 10666 10666 Tylosin Use Tylosin use at farm level in feed Tylosin Use No Tylosin Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 9.29 2.84 30.37 <0.0001 None
12719 12719 10229 None 7332 Akwar_2008_CaJoofVeRe_1 Associations of antimicrobial uses with antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from pigs on 47 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario and British Columbia Canada None 10667 10667 Tylosin Use Tylosin use at farm level in feed and by injection Tylosin Use No Tylosin Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 19.90 3.63 109.10 <0.0001 None
12720 12720 10229 None 7332 Akwar_2008_CaJoofVeRe_1 Associations of antimicrobial uses with antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from pigs on 47 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario and British Columbia Canada None 10658 10658 Penicillin Use Penicillin use at farm level by injection Penicillin Use No Penicillin Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 10.41 1.61 67.38 0.0141 None
12721 12721 10229 None 7332 Akwar_2008_CaJoofVeRe_1 Associations of antimicrobial uses with antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from pigs on 47 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario and British Columbia Canada None 10657 10657 Penicillin Use Penicillin use at farm level by injection Penicillin Use No Penicillin Use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.50 1.10 11.17 0.034 None
12722 12722 10229 None 7332 Akwar_2008_CaJoofVeRe_1 Associations of antimicrobial uses with antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from pigs on 47 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario and British Columbia Canada None 10659 10659 Spectinomycin Use Spectinomycin use at farm level Spectinomycin Use No Spectinomycin Use Swine None None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.39 -1.01 5.82 0.0539 None
12723 12723 10229 None 7332 Akwar_2008_CaJoofVeRe_1 Associations of antimicrobial uses with antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from pigs on 47 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario and British Columbia Canada None 10660 10660 Spectinomycin Use Spectinomycin use at farm level Spectinomycin Use No Spectinomycin Use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.39 -1.01 5.82 0.0539 None
12724 12724 10229 None 7332 Akwar_2008_CaJoofVeRe_1 Associations of antimicrobial uses with antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from pigs on 47 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario and British Columbia Canada None 10661 10661 Spectinomycin Use Spectinomycin use at farm level Spectinomycin Use No Spectinomycin Use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.29 1.15 4.16 0.0168 None
12725 12725 10229 None 7332 Akwar_2008_CaJoofVeRe_1 Associations of antimicrobial uses with antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from pigs on 47 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario and British Columbia Canada None 10662 10662 Sulfonamide Use Sulfonamide use at farm level in feed Sulfonamide Use No Sulfonamide Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.95 1.08 7.11 0.0344 None
12726 12726 10229 None 7332 Akwar_2008_CaJoofVeRe_1 Associations of antimicrobial uses with antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli from pigs on 47 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario and British Columbia Canada None 10664 10664 Tiamulin Use Tiamulin use at farm level Tiamulin Use No Tiamulin Use Swine None None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 7.75 1.25 48.11 0.028 None
12727 12727 10232 None 7342 10.1089/fpd.2010.0566 Alali_2010_FooPatandDis Prevalence and distribution of Salmonella in organic and conventional broiler poultry farms United States of America None 10679 10679 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 12 58 None None None None None
12728 12728 10232 None 7342 10.1089/fpd.2010.0566 Alali_2010_FooPatandDis Prevalence and distribution of Salmonella in organic and conventional broiler poultry farms United States of America None 10679 10679 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 12 58 None None None None None
12729 12729 10232 None 7342 10.1089/fpd.2010.0566 Alali_2010_FooPatandDis Prevalence and distribution of Salmonella in organic and conventional broiler poultry farms United States of America None 10679 10679 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 12 58 None None None None None
12730 12730 10232 None 7342 10.1089/fpd.2010.0566 Alali_2010_FooPatandDis Prevalence and distribution of Salmonella in organic and conventional broiler poultry farms United States of America None 10679 10679 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 12 58 None None None None None
12731 12731 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10818 10818 Production Type Pre-GP ban ('92-'96). Free-range is comparable to organic production. Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 3.40 None 22 29 None None None None None
12732 12732 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10818 10818 Production Type Pre-GP ban ('92-'96). Free-range is comparable to organic production. Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 3.70 None 21 27 None None None None None
12733 12733 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10818 10818 Production Type Pre-GP ban ('92-'96). Free-range is comparable to organic production. Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 34.80 None 74.10 None 23 27 None None None None None
12734 12734 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10818 10818 Production Type Pre-GP ban ('92-'96). Free-range is comparable to organic production. Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 17.40 None 51.90 None 23 27 None None None None None
12735 12735 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10818 10818 Production Type Pre-GP ban ('92-'96). Free-range is comparable to organic production. Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 21 26 None None None None None
12736 12736 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10817 10817 Growth Promotion Ban Pre-GP ban ('92-'96) vs. Post-GP Ban ('01-'02) in conventional production. GPs banned included avoparcin, virginiamycin, tylosin, spiramycin, bactracin. Growth Promoters Banned Growth Promoters Allowed Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 45.80 None 3.40 None 216 27 None None None None None
12737 12737 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10817 10817 Growth Promotion Ban Pre-GP ban ('92-'96) vs. Post-GP Ban ('01-'02) in conventional production. GPs banned included avoparcin, virginiamycin, tylosin, spiramycin, bactracin. Growth Promoters Banned Growth Promoters Allowed Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 46.70 None 3.70 None 214 27 None None None None None
12738 12738 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10817 10817 Growth Promotion Ban Pre-GP ban ('92-'96) vs. Post-GP Ban ('01-'02) in conventional production. GPs banned included avoparcin, virginiamycin, tylosin, spiramycin, bactracin. Growth Promoters Banned Growth Promoters Allowed Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 98.60 None 74.10 None 215 27 None None None None None
12739 12739 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10817 10817 Growth Promotion Ban Pre-GP ban ('92-'96) vs. Post-GP Ban ('01-'02) in conventional production. GPs banned included avoparcin, virginiamycin, tylosin, spiramycin, bactracin. Growth Promoters Banned Growth Promoters Allowed Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 75.50 None 51.90 None 216 27 None None None None None
12740 12740 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10817 10817 Growth Promotion Ban Pre-GP ban ('92-'96) vs. Post-GP Ban ('01-'02) in conventional production. GPs banned included avoparcin, virginiamycin, tylosin, spiramycin, bactracin. Growth Promoters Banned Growth Promoters Allowed Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 209 26 None None None None None
12741 12741 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10818 10818 Production Type Pre-GP ban ('92-'96). Free-range is comparable to organic production. Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 3.70 None 22 27 None None None None None
12742 12742 10281 None 8789 10.1093/jac/dkh473 Desmonts_2004_JoofAnCh Antimacrobial resistance in Campylobacter strains isolated from French broilers before and after antimicrobial growth promoter bans France Observational 10817 10817 Growth Promotion Ban Pre-GP ban ('92-'96) vs. Post-GP Ban ('01-'02) in conventional production. GPs banned included avoparcin, virginiamycin, tylosin, spiramycin, bactracin. Growth Promoters Banned Growth Promoters Allowed Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 54.40 None 3.70 None 215 27 None None None None None
12743 12743 10243 None 7541 Asai_2007_JaJoofInDi Association of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter isolated from food-producing animals with antimicrobial use on farms Japan Experimental 10716 10716 Fluoroquinolone Use Fluoroquinolone Use in the Past 6 Months Fluoroquinolone Use No Fluoroquinolone Use Chicken None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 0 None 9 None None None None None 0 122 None None None None None
12744 12744 10243 None 7541 Asai_2007_JaJoofInDi Association of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter isolated from food-producing animals with antimicrobial use on farms Japan Experimental 10723 10723 Tetracycline Use Tetracycline Use in the Past 6 Months Tetracycline Use No Tetracycline Use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 1 0 None None None None None
12745 12745 10243 None 7541 Asai_2007_JaJoofInDi Association of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter isolated from food-producing animals with antimicrobial use on farms Japan Experimental 10719 10719 Fluoroquinolone Use Fluoroquinolone Use in the Past 6 Months Fluoroquinolone Use No Fluoroquinolone Use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 0 1 None None None None None
12746 12746 10243 None 7541 Asai_2007_JaJoofInDi Association of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter isolated from food-producing animals with antimicrobial use on farms Japan Experimental 10720 10720 Fluoroquinolone Use Fluoroquinolone Use in the Past 6 Months Fluoroquinolone Use No Fluoroquinolone Use Cattle Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 3 None None None None None 0 7 None None None None None
12747 12747 10243 None 7541 Asai_2007_JaJoofInDi Association of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter isolated from food-producing animals with antimicrobial use on farms Japan Experimental 10719 10719 Fluoroquinolone Use Fluoroquinolone Use in the Past 6 Months Fluoroquinolone Use No Fluoroquinolone Use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 1 None 41 None None None None None 5 145 None None None None None
12748 12748 10243 None 7541 Asai_2007_JaJoofInDi Association of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter isolated from food-producing animals with antimicrobial use on farms Japan Experimental 10717 10717 Fluoroquinolone Use Fluoroquinolone Use in the Past 6 Months Fluoroquinolone Use No Fluoroquinolone Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 5 None None None None None 0 13 None None None None None
12749 12749 10243 None 7541 Asai_2007_JaJoofInDi Association of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter isolated from food-producing animals with antimicrobial use on farms Japan Experimental 10718 10718 Fluoroquinolone Use Fluoroquinolone Use in the Past 6 Months Fluoroquinolone Use No Fluoroquinolone Use Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 8 None None None None None 1 33 None None None None None
12750 12750 10243 None 7541 Asai_2007_JaJoofInDi Association of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter isolated from food-producing animals with antimicrobial use on farms Japan Experimental 10724 10724 Tetracycline Use Tetracycline Use in the Past 6 Months Tetracycline Use No Tetracycline Use Cattle Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False 1 None 3 None None None None None 1 6 None None None None None
12751 12751 10243 None 7541 Asai_2007_JaJoofInDi Association of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter isolated from food-producing animals with antimicrobial use on farms Japan Experimental 10723 10723 Tetracycline Use Tetracycline Use in the Past 6 Months Tetracycline Use No Tetracycline Use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False 32 None 101 None None None None None 34 116 None None None None None
12752 12752 10243 None 7541 Asai_2007_JaJoofInDi Association of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter isolated from food-producing animals with antimicrobial use on farms Japan Experimental 10721 10721 Tetracycline Use Tetracycline Use in the Past 6 Months Tetracycline Use No Tetracycline Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False 2 None 5 None None None None None 2 11 None None None None None
12753 12753 10243 None 7541 Asai_2007_JaJoofInDi Association of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter isolated from food-producing animals with antimicrobial use on farms Japan Experimental 10722 10722 Tetracycline Use Tetracycline Use in the Past 6 Months Tetracycline Use No Tetracycline Use Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False 2 None 13 None None None None None 3 31 None None None None None
12754 12754 20023 None 13525 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.020 Soonthornchaikul2006 Resistance to three antimicrobial agents of Campylobacter isolated from organically- and intensively-reared chickens purchased from retail outlets United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 11257 11257 Production Type Pre-packaged products, purchased from the supermarket. Organic Intensive (Conventional) Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 8.70 None 24 25 None None None None None
12755 12755 20023 None 13525 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.020 Soonthornchaikul2006 Resistance to three antimicrobial agents of Campylobacter isolated from organically- and intensively-reared chickens purchased from retail outlets United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 11257 11257 Production Type Pre-packaged products, purchased from the supermarket. Organic Intensive (Conventional) Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 24 25 None None None None None
12756 12756 20023 None 13525 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.020 Soonthornchaikul2006 Resistance to three antimicrobial agents of Campylobacter isolated from organically- and intensively-reared chickens purchased from retail outlets United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 11256 11256 Packaging Type / Retail Location Intensive Production (Conventional Rearing) Products Unpackaged (Butcher) Pre-packaged (Supermarket) Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 26.70 None 8.70 None 30 25 None None None None None
12757 12757 20023 None 13525 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.020 Soonthornchaikul2006 Resistance to three antimicrobial agents of Campylobacter isolated from organically- and intensively-reared chickens purchased from retail outlets United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 11256 11256 Packaging Type / Retail Location Intensive Production (Conventional Rearing) Products Unpackaged (Butcher) Pre-packaged (Supermarket) Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 30 25 None None None None None
12758 12758 20023 None 13525 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.020 Soonthornchaikul2006 Resistance to three antimicrobial agents of Campylobacter isolated from organically- and intensively-reared chickens purchased from retail outlets United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 11257 11257 Production Type Pre-packaged products, purchased from the supermarket. Organic Intensive (Conventional) Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 24 25 None None None None None
12759 12759 20023 None 13525 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.020 Soonthornchaikul2006 Resistance to three antimicrobial agents of Campylobacter isolated from organically- and intensively-reared chickens purchased from retail outlets United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 11256 11256 Packaging Type / Retail Location Intensive Production (Conventional Rearing) Products Unpackaged (Butcher) Pre-packaged (Supermarket) Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 30 25 None None None None None
12760 12760 10234 None 7363 10.1128/AEM.00489-08 Alexander_2008_AppandEnvMic Effect of subtherapeutic administration of antibiotics on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli bacteria in feedlot cattle Canada None 10681 10681 Chlortetracycline and Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline and Sulfamethazine Use (44ppm fed as Aureo S-700) Chlortetracycline and Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 683 695 None None None None None
12761 12761 10234 None 7363 10.1128/AEM.00489-08 Alexander_2008_AppandEnvMic Effect of subtherapeutic administration of antibiotics on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli bacteria in feedlot cattle Canada None 10682 10682 Chlortetracycline Use Chlortetracycline Use (11ppm fed as Aureomycin-100 G) Chlortetracycline Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 670 695 None None None None None
12762 12762 10234 None 7363 10.1128/AEM.00489-08 Alexander_2008_AppandEnvMic Effect of subtherapeutic administration of antibiotics on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli bacteria in feedlot cattle Canada None 10683 10683 Monensin Use Monensin Use (25 ppm fed as Rumensin) Monensin Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 457 695 None None None None None
12763 12763 10234 None 7363 10.1128/AEM.00489-08 Alexander_2008_AppandEnvMic Effect of subtherapeutic administration of antibiotics on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli bacteria in feedlot cattle Canada None 10685 10685 Tylosin Phosphate Use Tylosin Phosphate Use (11ppm, fed as Tylan) Tylosin Phosphate Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 552 695 None None None None None
12764 12764 10234 None 7363 10.1128/AEM.00489-08 Alexander_2008_AppandEnvMic Effect of subtherapeutic administration of antibiotics on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli bacteria in feedlot cattle Canada None 10687 10687 Virginiamycin Use Virginiamycin Use (31 ppm fed as V-max) Virginiamycin Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 455 695 None None None None None
12765 12765 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10329 10329 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline, administered at 6.5 weeks of age, in water, on a commercial farm. Measured at week 7. No AMU level given. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12766 12766 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10329 10329 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline, administered at 6.5 weeks of age, in water, on a commercial farm. Measured at week 7. No AMU level given. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12767 12767 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10329 10329 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline, administered at 6.5 weeks of age, in water, on a commercial farm. Measured at week 7. No AMU level given. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 77.00 None 97.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12768 12768 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10329 10329 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline, administered at 6.5 weeks of age, in water, on a commercial farm. Measured at week 7. No AMU level given. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12769 12769 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10329 10329 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline, administered at 6.5 weeks of age, in water, on a commercial farm. Measured at week 7. No AMU level given. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 77.00 None 58.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12770 12770 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10329 10329 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline, administered at 6.5 weeks of age, in water, on a commercial farm. Measured at week 7. No AMU level given. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12771 12771 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10329 10329 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline, administered at 6.5 weeks of age, in water, on a commercial farm. Measured at week 7. No AMU level given. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfathiazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 77.00 None 100.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12772 12772 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10329 10329 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline, administered at 6.5 weeks of age, in water, on a commercial farm. Measured at week 7. No AMU level given. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12773 12773 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10329 10329 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline, administered at 6.5 weeks of age, in water, on a commercial farm. Measured at week 7. No AMU level given. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 47.00 None 72.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12774 12774 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10329 10329 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline, administered at 6.5 weeks of age, in water, on a commercial farm. Measured at week 7. No AMU level given. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones sarafloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 47.00 None 97.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12775 12775 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10331 10331 Sarafloxacin Use Sarafloxacin, administered at 6 weeks of age, in water, on a commercial farm. Measured day after treatment. No AMU level given. Sarafloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 7.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12776 12776 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10331 10331 Sarafloxacin Use Sarafloxacin, administered at 6 weeks of age, in water, on a commercial farm. Measured day after treatment. No AMU level given. Sarafloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12777 12777 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10331 10331 Sarafloxacin Use Sarafloxacin, administered at 6 weeks of age, in water, on a commercial farm. Measured day after treatment. No AMU level given. Sarafloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 84.00 None 84.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12778 12778 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10331 10331 Sarafloxacin Use Sarafloxacin, administered at 6 weeks of age, in water, on a commercial farm. Measured day after treatment. No AMU level given. Sarafloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12779 12779 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10331 10331 Sarafloxacin Use Sarafloxacin, administered at 6 weeks of age, in water, on a commercial farm. Measured day after treatment. No AMU level given. Sarafloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 74.00 None 67.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12780 12780 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10331 10331 Sarafloxacin Use Sarafloxacin, administered at 6 weeks of age, in water, on a commercial farm. Measured day after treatment. No AMU level given. Sarafloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 74.00 None 97.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12781 12781 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10331 10331 Sarafloxacin Use Sarafloxacin, administered at 6 weeks of age, in water, on a commercial farm. Measured day after treatment. No AMU level given. Sarafloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfathiazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 84.00 None 94.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12782 12782 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10331 10331 Sarafloxacin Use Sarafloxacin, administered at 6 weeks of age, in water, on a commercial farm. Measured day after treatment. No AMU level given. Sarafloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12783 12783 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10331 10331 Sarafloxacin Use Sarafloxacin, administered at 6 weeks of age, in water, on a commercial farm. Measured day after treatment. No AMU level given. Sarafloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 80.00 None 67.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12784 12784 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10331 10331 Sarafloxacin Use Sarafloxacin, administered at 6 weeks of age, in water, on a commercial farm. Measured day after treatment. No AMU level given. Sarafloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones sarafloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 84.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12785 12785 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10330 10330 Sarafloxacin Use Sarafloxacin, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 20 ppm over 5 days. Sarafloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 7.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12786 12786 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10330 10330 Sarafloxacin Use Sarafloxacin, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 20 ppm over 5 days. Sarafloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 37.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12787 12787 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10330 10330 Sarafloxacin Use Sarafloxacin, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 20 ppm over 5 days. Sarafloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12788 12788 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10330 10330 Sarafloxacin Use Sarafloxacin, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 20 ppm over 5 days. Sarafloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 40.00 None 80.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12789 12789 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10330 10330 Sarafloxacin Use Sarafloxacin, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 20 ppm over 5 days. Sarafloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfathiazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 20.00 None 73.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12790 12790 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10330 10330 Sarafloxacin Use Sarafloxacin, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 20 ppm over 5 days. Sarafloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 30.00 None 47.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12791 12791 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10327 10327 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 25 ppm over 3 days. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.00 None 7.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12792 12792 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10327 10327 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 25 ppm over 3 days. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 7.00 None 37.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12793 12793 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10327 10327 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 25 ppm over 3 days. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12794 12794 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10327 10327 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 25 ppm over 3 days. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 20.00 None 80.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12795 12795 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10327 10327 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 25 ppm over 3 days. Enrofloxacin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 50.00 None 47.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12796 12796 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10328 10328 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 25 ppm over 5 days. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 7.00 None 7.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12797 12797 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10328 10328 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 25 ppm over 5 days. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.00 None 37.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12798 12798 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10328 10328 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 25 ppm over 5 days. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12799 12799 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10328 10328 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 25 ppm over 5 days. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 40.00 None 80.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12800 12800 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10328 10328 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 25 ppm over 5 days. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfathiazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.00 None 73.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12801 12801 10116 None 13463 10.1128/aem.01193-06 Smith2007 Impact of antimicrobial usage on antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli strains colonizing broiler chickens United States of America Experimental 10328 10328 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline, administered at 4 weeks of age, in water, at therapeutic levels of 25 ppm over 5 days. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.00 None 47.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
12802 12802 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10928 10928 Gentamicin Use Gentamicin administered, in water, as Gentamicina at 115 mg/L, at days 19 - 21. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin use. Gentamicin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 85.00 None 38.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12803 12803 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10928 10928 Gentamicin Use Gentamicin administered, in water, as Gentamicina at 115 mg/L, at days 19 - 21. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin use. Gentamicin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12804 12804 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10928 10928 Gentamicin Use Gentamicin administered, in water, as Gentamicina at 115 mg/L, at days 19 - 21. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin use. Gentamicin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 27.00 None 15.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12805 12805 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10928 10928 Gentamicin Use Gentamicin administered, in water, as Gentamicina at 115 mg/L, at days 19 - 21. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin use. Gentamicin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 69.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12806 12806 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10928 10928 Gentamicin Use Gentamicin administered, in water, as Gentamicina at 115 mg/L, at days 19 - 21. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin use. Gentamicin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 58.00 None 35.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12807 12807 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10928 10928 Gentamicin Use Gentamicin administered, in water, as Gentamicina at 115 mg/L, at days 19 - 21. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin use. Gentamicin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 69.00 None 23.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12808 12808 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10928 10928 Gentamicin Use Gentamicin administered, in water, as Gentamicina at 115 mg/L, at days 19 - 21. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin use. Gentamicin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 23.00 None 0.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12809 12809 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10928 10928 Gentamicin Use Gentamicin administered, in water, as Gentamicina at 115 mg/L, at days 19 - 21. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin use. Gentamicin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 50.00 None 0.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12810 12810 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10928 10928 Gentamicin Use Gentamicin administered, in water, as Gentamicina at 115 mg/L, at days 19 - 21. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin use. Gentamicin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 15.00 None 0.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12811 12811 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10928 10928 Gentamicin Use Gentamicin administered, in water, as Gentamicina at 115 mg/L, at days 19 - 21. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin use. Gentamicin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 19.00 None 0.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12812 12812 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10928 10928 Gentamicin Use Gentamicin administered, in water, as Gentamicina at 115 mg/L, at days 19 - 21. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin use. Gentamicin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 19.00 None 0.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12813 12813 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10928 10928 Gentamicin Use Gentamicin administered, in water, as Gentamicina at 115 mg/L, at days 19 - 21. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin use. Gentamicin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 81.00 None 19.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12814 12814 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10926 10926 Amoxicillin Use Amoxicillin administered, in water, as Paracilina at 140 mg/L, at days 26 - 28. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin and gentamicin use. Amoxicillin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 81.00 None 31.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12815 12815 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10926 10926 Amoxicillin Use Amoxicillin administered, in water, as Paracilina at 140 mg/L, at days 26 - 28. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin and gentamicin use. Amoxicillin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12816 12816 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10926 10926 Amoxicillin Use Amoxicillin administered, in water, as Paracilina at 140 mg/L, at days 26 - 28. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin and gentamicin use. Amoxicillin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 42.00 None 11.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12817 12817 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10926 10926 Amoxicillin Use Amoxicillin administered, in water, as Paracilina at 140 mg/L, at days 26 - 28. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin and gentamicin use. Amoxicillin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 81.00 None 65.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12818 12818 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10926 10926 Amoxicillin Use Amoxicillin administered, in water, as Paracilina at 140 mg/L, at days 26 - 28. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin and gentamicin use. Amoxicillin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 42.00 None 27.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12819 12819 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10926 10926 Amoxicillin Use Amoxicillin administered, in water, as Paracilina at 140 mg/L, at days 26 - 28. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin and gentamicin use. Amoxicillin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 35.00 None 15.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12820 12820 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10926 10926 Amoxicillin Use Amoxicillin administered, in water, as Paracilina at 140 mg/L, at days 26 - 28. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin and gentamicin use. Amoxicillin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 19.00 None 11.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12821 12821 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10926 10926 Amoxicillin Use Amoxicillin administered, in water, as Paracilina at 140 mg/L, at days 26 - 28. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin and gentamicin use. Amoxicillin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 23.00 None 0.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12822 12822 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10926 10926 Amoxicillin Use Amoxicillin administered, in water, as Paracilina at 140 mg/L, at days 26 - 28. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin and gentamicin use. Amoxicillin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 11.00 None 4.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12823 12823 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10926 10926 Amoxicillin Use Amoxicillin administered, in water, as Paracilina at 140 mg/L, at days 26 - 28. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin and gentamicin use. Amoxicillin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 27.00 None 0.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12824 12824 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10926 10926 Amoxicillin Use Amoxicillin administered, in water, as Paracilina at 140 mg/L, at days 26 - 28. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin and gentamicin use. Amoxicillin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.00 None 0.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12825 12825 10311 None 11545 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.06.006 da.Costa_2009_VeteMicr Field trial evaluating changes in prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolated from growing broilers medicated with enrofloxacin, apramycin and amoxicillin Portugal Experimental 10926 10926 Amoxicillin Use Amoxicillin administered, in water, as Paracilina at 140 mg/L, at days 26 - 28. Resistance measured at day 25. History of enrofloxacin and gentamicin use. Amoxicillin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 54.00 None 8.00 None 26 26 None None None 0.49 None
12826 12826 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10341 10341 ABF Rearing Practice Here, ABF (antibiotic-free) is defined as no exposure post-weaning. Under the extensive ABF system, pigs have free access to the environment and are placed in barricaded fields - pigs in the intensive system are placed in confined barns with concrete slat Extensive (Roamed) Intensive (Confined) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 1 226 None None None None None
12827 12827 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10341 10341 ABF Rearing Practice Here, ABF (antibiotic-free) is defined as no exposure post-weaning. Under the extensive ABF system, pigs have free access to the environment and are placed in barricaded fields - pigs in the intensive system are placed in confined barns with concrete slat Extensive (Roamed) Intensive (Confined) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 1 226 None None None None None
12828 12828 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10341 10341 ABF Rearing Practice Here, ABF (antibiotic-free) is defined as no exposure post-weaning. Under the extensive ABF system, pigs have free access to the environment and are placed in barricaded fields - pigs in the intensive system are placed in confined barns with concrete slat Extensive (Roamed) Intensive (Confined) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 30 None None None None None 1 226 None None None None None
12829 12829 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10341 10341 ABF Rearing Practice Here, ABF (antibiotic-free) is defined as no exposure post-weaning. Under the extensive ABF system, pigs have free access to the environment and are placed in barricaded fields - pigs in the intensive system are placed in confined barns with concrete slat Extensive (Roamed) Intensive (Confined) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 64 None None None None None 1 226 None None None None None
12830 12830 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10341 10341 ABF Rearing Practice Here, ABF (antibiotic-free) is defined as no exposure post-weaning. Under the extensive ABF system, pigs have free access to the environment and are placed in barricaded fields - pigs in the intensive system are placed in confined barns with concrete slat Extensive (Roamed) Intensive (Confined) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 48 None None None None None 1 226 None None None None None
12831 12831 10122 None 13826 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.025 Thakur2007 Occurrence of multidrug resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 10341 10341 ABF Rearing Practice Here, ABF (antibiotic-free) is defined as no exposure post-weaning. Under the extensive ABF system, pigs have free access to the environment and are placed in barricaded fields - pigs in the intensive system are placed in confined barns with concrete slat Extensive (Roamed) Intensive (Confined) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 1 226 None None None None None
12832 12832 10235 None 7365 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.008 Alexander_2010_InJoofFoMi Farm-to-fork characterization of Escherichia coli associated with feedlot cattle with a known history of antimicrobial use Canada None 10688 10688 Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline sulfamethazine, administered in water, as Aureo S-700 (AS700), at 44 ppm. Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 14 18 None None None None None
12833 12833 10235 None 7365 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.008 Alexander_2010_InJoofFoMi Farm-to-fork characterization of Escherichia coli associated with feedlot cattle with a known history of antimicrobial use Canada None 10688 10688 Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline sulfamethazine, administered in water, as Aureo S-700 (AS700), at 44 ppm. Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 3 None None None None None 14 18 None None None None None
12834 12834 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10482 10482 Predominant Milking System None Milking Parlor Tiestall Milking Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.01 1.46 6.21 0.003 None
12835 12835 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10481 10481 Predominant Milking System None Automatic Milking System Tiestall Milking Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.46 0.77 2.79 0.25 None
12836 12836 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10478 10478 Herd Size None 63 to 98 Cows 28 to 62 Cows Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.67 1.09 2.56 0.02 None
12837 12837 10164 None 8978 10.3168/jds.2014-8432 Duse2015 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli from preweaned dairy calves Sweden None 10477 10477 Herd Size None 100 to 1175 Cows 28 to 62 Cows Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.57 1.02 2.27 0.04 None
12838 12838 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10284 10284 Production Type Production Type (Calves) Organic Conventional Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 48 None 86 None None None None None 281 284 None None None None None
12839 12839 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10285 10285 Production Type Production Type (Cows) Organic Conventional Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 7 None None None None None 270 286 None None None None None
12840 12840 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10284 10284 Production Type Production Type (Calves) Organic Conventional Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 9 None None None None None 281 284 None None None None None
12841 12841 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10285 10285 Production Type Production Type (Cows) Organic Conventional Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 270 286 None None None None None
12842 12842 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10284 10284 Production Type Production Type (Calves) Organic Conventional Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 61 None 98 None None None None None 281 284 None None None None None
12843 12843 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10285 10285 Production Type Production Type (Cows) Organic Conventional Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 7 None 7 None None None None None 270 286 None None None None None
12844 12844 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10284 10284 Production Type Production Type (Calves) Organic Conventional Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False 51 None 104 None None None None None 281 284 None None None None None
12845 12845 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10285 10285 Production Type Production Type (Cows) Organic Conventional Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 4 None None None None None 270 286 None None None None None
12846 12846 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10284 10284 Production Type Production Type (Calves) Organic Conventional Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 7 None 20 None None None None None 281 284 None None None None None
12847 12847 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10285 10285 Production Type Production Type (Cows) Organic Conventional Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 270 286 None None None None None
12848 12848 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10284 10284 Production Type Production Type (Calves) Organic Conventional Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 4 None None None None None 281 284 None None None None None
12849 12849 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10285 10285 Production Type Production Type (Cows) Organic Conventional Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 3 None None None None None 270 286 None None None None None
12850 12850 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10284 10284 Production Type Production Type (Calves) Organic Conventional Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 22 None None None None None 281 284 None None None None None
12851 12851 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10285 10285 Production Type Production Type (Cows) Organic Conventional Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 270 286 None None None None None
12852 12852 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10284 10284 Production Type Production Type (Calves) Organic Conventional Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 17 None None None None None 281 284 None None None None None
12853 12853 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10285 10285 Production Type Production Type (Cows) Organic Conventional Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 1 None None None None None 270 286 None None None None None
12854 12854 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10284 10284 Production Type Production Type (Calves) Organic Conventional Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False 51 None 81 None None None None None 281 284 None None None None None
12855 12855 10105 None 13113 10.2460/javma.2005.226.589 Sato2005 Antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli isolates from dairy farms using organic versus conventional production methods United States of America None 10285 10285 Production Type Production Type (Cows) Organic Conventional Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 9 None None None None None 270 286 None None None None None
12856 12856 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11104 11104 Heifer-raiser Type Heifer-raiser Type Multi-source Heifer Raiser Single (Home) Farm Heifer Raiser Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pen Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 3 None 0 None None None None None 8 31 None None None None None
12857 12857 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11104 11104 Heifer-raiser Type Heifer-raiser Type Multi-source Heifer Raiser Single (Home) Farm Heifer Raiser Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pen Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 3 None 0 None None None None None 8 31 None None None None None
12858 12858 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11103 11103 Heifer-raiser Type None Multi-source Heifer Raiser Single (Home) Farm Heifer Raiser Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pen Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 3 None 0 None None None None None 8 31 None None None None None
12859 12859 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11103 11103 Heifer-raiser Type None Multi-source Heifer Raiser Single (Home) Farm Heifer Raiser Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pen Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 8 31 None None None None None
12860 12860 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11104 11104 Heifer-raiser Type Heifer-raiser Type Multi-source Heifer Raiser Single (Home) Farm Heifer Raiser Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pen Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 3 None 0 None None None None None 8 31 None None None None None
12861 12861 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11104 11104 Heifer-raiser Type Heifer-raiser Type Multi-source Heifer Raiser Single (Home) Farm Heifer Raiser Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pen Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 8 31 None None None None None
12862 12862 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11104 11104 Heifer-raiser Type Heifer-raiser Type Multi-source Heifer Raiser Single (Home) Farm Heifer Raiser Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pen Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 8 31 None None None None None
12863 12863 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11104 11104 Heifer-raiser Type Heifer-raiser Type Multi-source Heifer Raiser Single (Home) Farm Heifer Raiser Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Aminoglycosides neomycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 8 31 None None None None None
12864 12864 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11104 11104 Heifer-raiser Type Heifer-raiser Type Multi-source Heifer Raiser Single (Home) Farm Heifer Raiser Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 3 None 0 None None None None None 8 31 None None None None None
12865 12865 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11104 11104 Heifer-raiser Type Heifer-raiser Type Multi-source Heifer Raiser Single (Home) Farm Heifer Raiser Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 3 None 1 None None None None None 8 31 None None None None None
12866 12866 10434 None 60018 10.1017/S0950268815000357 Pereira et al. (2015) Effect of heifer-raising practices on E.coli antimicrobial resistance and Salmonella prevalence in heifer raisers United States of America Observational 11104 11104 Heifer-raiser Type Heifer-raiser Type Multi-source Heifer Raiser Single (Home) Farm Heifer Raiser Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 8 31 None None None None None
12867 12867 10115 None 13358 10.1637/1933-5334(2007)2[e17:ciopaa]2.0.co;2 Siemon2007 Comparative Investigation of Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella between Pasture and Conventionally Reared Poultry United States of America Observational 10325 10325 Production Type Pasture poultry farms rear broilers outside, in small, moveable pens. Pastured Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 37 None 68 None None None None None 162 188 None None None None None
12868 12868 10115 None 13358 10.1637/1933-5334(2007)2[e17:ciopaa]2.0.co;2 Siemon2007 Comparative Investigation of Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella between Pasture and Conventionally Reared Poultry United States of America Observational 10325 10325 Production Type Pasture poultry farms rear broilers outside, in small, moveable pens. Pastured Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 67 None None None None None 162 188 None None None None None
12869 12869 10115 None 13358 10.1637/1933-5334(2007)2[e17:ciopaa]2.0.co;2 Siemon2007 Comparative Investigation of Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella between Pasture and Conventionally Reared Poultry United States of America Observational 10325 10325 Production Type Pasture poultry farms rear broilers outside, in small, moveable pens. Pastured Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 27 None 67 None None None None None 162 188 None None None None None
12870 12870 10115 None 13358 10.1637/1933-5334(2007)2[e17:ciopaa]2.0.co;2 Siemon2007 Comparative Investigation of Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella between Pasture and Conventionally Reared Poultry United States of America Observational 10325 10325 Production Type Pasture poultry farms rear broilers outside, in small, moveable pens. Pastured Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 37 None 63 None None None None None 162 188 None None None None None
12871 12871 10115 None 13358 10.1637/1933-5334(2007)2[e17:ciopaa]2.0.co;2 Siemon2007 Comparative Investigation of Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella between Pasture and Conventionally Reared Poultry United States of America Observational 10325 10325 Production Type Pasture poultry farms rear broilers outside, in small, moveable pens. Pastured Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False 36 None 2 None None None None None 162 188 None None None None None
12872 12872 10115 None 13358 10.1637/1933-5334(2007)2[e17:ciopaa]2.0.co;2 Siemon2007 Comparative Investigation of Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella between Pasture and Conventionally Reared Poultry United States of America Observational 10325 10325 Production Type Pasture poultry farms rear broilers outside, in small, moveable pens. Pastured Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 0 None None None None None 162 188 None None None None None
12873 12873 10115 None 13358 10.1637/1933-5334(2007)2[e17:ciopaa]2.0.co;2 Siemon2007 Comparative Investigation of Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella between Pasture and Conventionally Reared Poultry United States of America Observational 10325 10325 Production Type Pasture poultry farms rear broilers outside, in small, moveable pens. Pastured Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 1 None None None None None 162 188 None None None None None
12874 12874 10115 None 13358 10.1637/1933-5334(2007)2[e17:ciopaa]2.0.co;2 Siemon2007 Comparative Investigation of Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella between Pasture and Conventionally Reared Poultry United States of America Observational 10325 10325 Production Type Pasture poultry farms rear broilers outside, in small, moveable pens. Pastured Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 0 None None None None None 162 188 None None None None None
12875 12875 10258 None 8181 10.1089/mdr.2014.0037 Callens_2015_MicrDrugResi Presence of antimicrobial resistance and antimicrobial use in sows are risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in their offspring Belgium None 10780 10780 Enrofloxacin Use Enrofloxacin Use in Offspring Piglet Enrofloxacin Use No Use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 25.00 None 6.30 None 8 286 None None None <0.05 None
12876 12876 10146 None 8528 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-10-495 Cook2011 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichiae coli isolated from retail milk-fed veal meat from Southern Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10397 10397 Veal Type None Grain-fed Veal Milk-fed Veal Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 1258 392 None None None None None
12877 12877 10146 None 8528 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-10-495 Cook2011 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichiae coli isolated from retail milk-fed veal meat from Southern Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10397 10397 Veal Type None Grain-fed Veal Milk-fed Veal Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.74 None 7.40 None 1258 392 None None None None None
12878 12878 10146 None 8528 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-10-495 Cook2011 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichiae coli isolated from retail milk-fed veal meat from Southern Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10397 10397 Veal Type None Grain-fed Veal Milk-fed Veal Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.89 None 32.65 None 1258 392 None None None None None
12879 12879 10146 None 8528 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-10-495 Cook2011 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichiae coli isolated from retail milk-fed veal meat from Southern Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10397 10397 Veal Type None Grain-fed Veal Milk-fed Veal Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 22.89 None 42.39 None 1258 392 None None None None None
12880 12880 10146 None 8528 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-10-495 Cook2011 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichiae coli isolated from retail milk-fed veal meat from Southern Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10397 10397 Veal Type None Grain-fed Veal Milk-fed Veal Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 11.21 None 32.95 None 1258 392 None None None None None
12881 12881 10146 None 8528 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-10-495 Cook2011 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichiae coli isolated from retail milk-fed veal meat from Southern Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10397 10397 Veal Type None Grain-fed Veal Milk-fed Veal Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 31.16 None 51.79 None 1258 392 None None None None None
12882 12882 10146 None 8528 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-10-495 Cook2011 Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichiae coli isolated from retail milk-fed veal meat from Southern Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10397 10397 Veal Type None Grain-fed Veal Milk-fed Veal Cattle Veal Calves None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 6.76 None 17.34 None 1258 392 None None None None None
12883 12883 10085 None 12444 10.3168/jds.2011-4337 Pereira2011 Antimicrobial resistance and prevalence of virulence factor genes in fecal Escherichia coli of Holstein calves fed milk with and without antimicrobials United States of America None 10233 10233 Growth Promoter Use Growth promoters added to milk as 1.56 ml/L sulfamethazine sodium, and 1.04 mg/L chlortetracycline. Growth Promoter Use No Growth Promoter Use Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Fourth-generation cephalosporins cefepime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 159 92 None None None None None
12884 12884 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10316 10316 Chlortetracycline Use Chlortetracycline, fed as Aureomycin-100G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 25 None 24 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
12885 12885 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10317 10317 CTC Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine, fed as Aureo S-700G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC and Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 33 None 24 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
12886 12886 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10316 10316 Chlortetracycline Use Chlortetracycline, fed as Aureomycin-100G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
12887 12887 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10317 10317 CTC Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine, fed as Aureo S-700G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC and Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
12888 12888 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10316 10316 Chlortetracycline Use Chlortetracycline, fed as Aureomycin-100G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
12889 12889 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10317 10317 CTC Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine, fed as Aureo S-700G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC and Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
12890 12890 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10316 10316 Chlortetracycline Use Chlortetracycline, fed as Aureomycin-100G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
12891 12891 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10317 10317 CTC Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine, fed as Aureo S-700G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC and Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
12892 12892 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10316 10316 Chlortetracycline Use Chlortetracycline, fed as Aureomycin-100G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
12893 12893 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10317 10317 CTC Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine, fed as Aureo S-700G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC and Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
12894 12894 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10316 10316 Chlortetracycline Use Chlortetracycline, fed as Aureomycin-100G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
12895 12895 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10317 10317 CTC Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine, fed as Aureo S-700G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC and Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
12896 12896 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10316 10316 Chlortetracycline Use Chlortetracycline, fed as Aureomycin-100G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
12897 12897 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10317 10317 CTC Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine, fed as Aureo S-700G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC and Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
12898 12898 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10316 10316 Chlortetracycline Use Chlortetracycline, fed as Aureomycin-100G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
12899 12899 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10317 10317 CTC Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine, fed as Aureo S-700G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC and Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
12900 12900 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10316 10316 Chlortetracycline Use Chlortetracycline, fed as Aureomycin-100G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
12901 12901 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10317 10317 CTC Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine, fed as Aureo S-700G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC and Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
12902 12902 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10316 10316 Chlortetracycline Use Chlortetracycline, fed as Aureomycin-100G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 40 None 40 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
12903 12903 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10317 10317 CTC Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine, fed as Aureo S-700G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC and Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 40 None 40 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
12904 12904 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10316 10316 Chlortetracycline Use Chlortetracycline, fed as Aureomycin-100G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 10 None 4 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
12905 12905 10112 None 13283 10.1128/aem.00704-08 Sharma2008 Diversity and distribution of commensal fecal Escherichia coli bacteria in beef cattle administered selected subtherapeutic antimicrobials in a feedlot setting Canada None 10317 10317 CTC Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine, fed as Aureo S-700G, at 350 mg per head, per day, for 197 days. CTC and Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 4 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
12906 12906 10235 None 7365 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.008 Alexander_2010_InJoofFoMi Farm-to-fork characterization of Escherichia coli associated with feedlot cattle with a known history of antimicrobial use Canada None 10689 10689 CTC Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline sulfamethazine, administered in water, as Aureo S-700 (AS700), at 44 ppm. Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 14 18 None None None None None
12907 12907 10235 None 7365 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.008 Alexander_2010_InJoofFoMi Farm-to-fork characterization of Escherichia coli associated with feedlot cattle with a known history of antimicrobial use Canada None 10690 10690 CTC Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline sulfamethazine, administered in water, as Aureo S-700 (AS700), at 44 ppm. CTC and Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftazidime None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 14 18 None None None None None
12908 12908 10235 None 7365 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.11.008 Alexander_2010_InJoofFoMi Farm-to-fork characterization of Escherichia coli associated with feedlot cattle with a known history of antimicrobial use Canada None 10689 10689 CTC Sulfamethazine Use Chlortetracycline sulfamethazine, administered in water, as Aureo S-700 (AS700), at 44 ppm. Chlortetracycline Sulfamethazine Use No Use Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 14 18 None None None None None
12909 12909 10351 None 7585 10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.07.001 Avrain_2003_VeteMicr Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter from broilers: Association with production type and antimicrobial use France Observational 11035 11035 Ionophore Use Standard (conventional) production. Ionophore Use No Use Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Flock Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter coli False None False 16 None 6 None None None None None 26 21 None None None None None
12910 12910 20035 None 9756 10.1089/fpd.2008.0171 Han2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. in Louisiana retail chickens after the enrofloxacin ban United States of America Observational 11290 11290 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 41 69 None None None None None
12911 12911 20035 None 9756 10.1089/fpd.2008.0171 Han2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. in Louisiana retail chickens after the enrofloxacin ban United States of America Observational 11290 11290 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 0 None 10 None None None None None 41 69 None None None None None
12912 12912 20035 None 9756 10.1089/fpd.2008.0171 Han2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. in Louisiana retail chickens after the enrofloxacin ban United States of America Observational 11290 11290 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 43.90 None 31.90 None 41 69 None None None None None
12913 12913 20035 None 9756 10.1089/fpd.2008.0171 Han2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. in Louisiana retail chickens after the enrofloxacin ban United States of America Observational 11290 11290 Production Type None Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 5 None 16 None None None None None 41 69 None None None None None
12914 12914 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10418 10418 Bambermycin Use Bambermycin used as a growth promotor, at 2 mg/kg in feed. Bambermycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 19 None 21 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12915 12915 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10421 10421 Penicillin Use Penicillin used as a growth promotor, at 2.2 mg/kg in feed. Penicillin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 20 None 21 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12916 12916 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10425 10425 Salinomycin Use Salinomycin used as a growth promotor, at 60 mg/kg in feed. Salinomycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 24 None 21 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12917 12917 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10415 10415 Bacitracin Use Bacitracin used as a growth promotor, at 4.4 mg/kg in feed. Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 20 None 21 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12918 12918 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10422 10422 Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use Salinomycin and bacitracin used as growth promotors, at 1.1 mg/kg and 3.3 mg/kg respectively. Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 17 None 21 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
12919 12919 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10418 10418 Bambermycin Use Bambermycin used as a growth promotor, at 2 mg/kg in feed. Bambermycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 7 None 12 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12920 12920 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10421 10421 Penicillin Use Penicillin used as a growth promotor, at 2.2 mg/kg in feed. Penicillin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 10 None 12 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12921 12921 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10425 10425 Salinomycin Use Salinomycin used as a growth promotor, at 60 mg/kg in feed. Salinomycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 12 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12922 12922 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10415 10415 Bacitracin Use Bacitracin used as a growth promotor, at 4.4 mg/kg in feed. Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 12 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12923 12923 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10422 10422 Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use Salinomycin and bacitracin used as growth promotors, at 1.1 mg/kg and 3.3 mg/kg respectively. Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 12 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
12924 12924 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10418 10418 Bambermycin Use Bambermycin used as a growth promotor, at 2 mg/kg in feed. Bambermycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 15 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12925 12925 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10421 10421 Penicillin Use Penicillin used as a growth promotor, at 2.2 mg/kg in feed. Penicillin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 15 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12926 12926 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10425 10425 Salinomycin Use Salinomycin used as a growth promotor, at 60 mg/kg in feed. Salinomycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 19 None 15 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12927 12927 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10415 10415 Bacitracin Use Bacitracin used as a growth promotor, at 4.4 mg/kg in feed. Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 17 None 15 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12928 12928 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10422 10422 Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use Salinomycin and bacitracin used as growth promotors, at 1.1 mg/kg and 3.3 mg/kg respectively. Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 15 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
12929 12929 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10418 10418 Bambermycin Use Bambermycin used as a growth promotor, at 2 mg/kg in feed. Bambermycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 8 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12930 12930 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10421 10421 Penicillin Use Penicillin used as a growth promotor, at 2.2 mg/kg in feed. Penicillin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 8 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12931 12931 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10425 10425 Salinomycin Use Salinomycin used as a growth promotor, at 60 mg/kg in feed. Salinomycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 8 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12932 12932 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10415 10415 Bacitracin Use Bacitracin used as a growth promotor, at 4.4 mg/kg in feed. Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 8 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12933 12933 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10422 10422 Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use Salinomycin and bacitracin used as growth promotors, at 1.1 mg/kg and 3.3 mg/kg respectively. Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 8 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
12934 12934 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10418 10418 Bambermycin Use Bambermycin used as a growth promotor, at 2 mg/kg in feed. Bambermycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones sarafloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 2 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12935 12935 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10421 10421 Penicillin Use Penicillin used as a growth promotor, at 2.2 mg/kg in feed. Penicillin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones sarafloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 2 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12936 12936 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10425 10425 Salinomycin Use Salinomycin used as a growth promotor, at 60 mg/kg in feed. Salinomycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones sarafloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 2 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12937 12937 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10415 10415 Bacitracin Use Bacitracin used as a growth promotor, at 4.4 mg/kg in feed. Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones sarafloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 2 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12938 12938 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10422 10422 Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use Salinomycin and bacitracin used as growth promotors, at 1.1 mg/kg and 3.3 mg/kg respectively. Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones sarafloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 2 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
12939 12939 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10418 10418 Bambermycin Use Bambermycin used as a growth promotor, at 2 mg/kg in feed. Bambermycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfadimethoxine None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 14 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12940 12940 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10421 10421 Penicillin Use Penicillin used as a growth promotor, at 2.2 mg/kg in feed. Penicillin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfadimethoxine None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 14 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12941 12941 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10425 10425 Salinomycin Use Salinomycin used as a growth promotor, at 60 mg/kg in feed. Salinomycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfadimethoxine None Escherichia coli False None False 18 None 14 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12942 12942 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10415 10415 Bacitracin Use Bacitracin used as a growth promotor, at 4.4 mg/kg in feed. Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfadimethoxine None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 14 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12943 12943 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10422 10422 Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use Salinomycin and bacitracin used as growth promotors, at 1.1 mg/kg and 3.3 mg/kg respectively. Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfadimethoxine None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 14 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
12944 12944 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10418 10418 Bambermycin Use Bambermycin used as a growth promotor, at 2 mg/kg in feed. Bambermycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfathiazole None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 14 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12945 12945 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10421 10421 Penicillin Use Penicillin used as a growth promotor, at 2.2 mg/kg in feed. Penicillin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfathiazole None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 14 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12946 12946 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10425 10425 Salinomycin Use Salinomycin used as a growth promotor, at 60 mg/kg in feed. Salinomycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfathiazole None Escherichia coli False None False 18 None 14 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12947 12947 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10415 10415 Bacitracin Use Bacitracin used as a growth promotor, at 4.4 mg/kg in feed. Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfathiazole None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 14 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12948 12948 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10422 10422 Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use Salinomycin and bacitracin used as growth promotors, at 1.1 mg/kg and 3.3 mg/kg respectively. Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfathiazole None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 14 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
12949 12949 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10418 10418 Bambermycin Use Bambermycin used as a growth promotor, at 2 mg/kg in feed. Bambermycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 1 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12950 12950 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10421 10421 Penicillin Use Penicillin used as a growth promotor, at 2.2 mg/kg in feed. Penicillin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12951 12951 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10425 10425 Salinomycin Use Salinomycin used as a growth promotor, at 60 mg/kg in feed. Salinomycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 1 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12952 12952 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10415 10415 Bacitracin Use Bacitracin used as a growth promotor, at 4.4 mg/kg in feed. Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12953 12953 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10422 10422 Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use Salinomycin and bacitracin used as growth promotors, at 1.1 mg/kg and 3.3 mg/kg respectively. Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
12954 12954 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10418 10418 Bambermycin Use Bambermycin used as a growth promotor, at 2 mg/kg in feed. Bambermycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 8 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12955 12955 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10421 10421 Penicillin Use Penicillin used as a growth promotor, at 2.2 mg/kg in feed. Penicillin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 8 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12956 12956 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10425 10425 Salinomycin Use Salinomycin used as a growth promotor, at 60 mg/kg in feed. Salinomycin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 8 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12957 12957 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10415 10415 Bacitracin Use Bacitracin used as a growth promotor, at 4.4 mg/kg in feed. Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 8 None None None None None 33 33 None None None None None
12958 12958 10157 None 8819 10.1128/aem.01086-07 Diarra2007 Impact of feed supplementation with antimicrobial agents on growth performance of broiler chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus counts, and antibiotic resistance phenotypes and distribution of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Escheric Canada Experimental 10422 10422 Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use Salinomycin and bacitracin used as growth promotors, at 1.1 mg/kg and 3.3 mg/kg respectively. Salinomycin and Bacitracin Use (GP) No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 10 None 8 None None None None None 32 33 None None None None None
12959 12959 10302 None 10542 10.1371/journal.pone.0080575 Kanwar_2013_PLoONE Effects of ceftiofur and chlortetracycline treatment strategies on antimicrobial susceptibility and on tet(A), tet(B), and blaCMY-2 resistance genes among E. coli isolated from the feces of feedlot cattle United States of America None 10907 10907 CCFA Treatment Strategy A single dose of CCFA (6.6 mg/kg) administered to either a single steer (1/11), or all steers (11/11) representing metaphylaxis. Individual Treatment Metaphylactic Treatment Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.63 None 16.18 None 100 100 None None None None None
12960 12960 10302 None 10542 10.1371/journal.pone.0080575 Kanwar_2013_PLoONE Effects of ceftiofur and chlortetracycline treatment strategies on antimicrobial susceptibility and on tet(A), tet(B), and blaCMY-2 resistance genes among E. coli isolated from the feces of feedlot cattle United States of America None 10907 10907 CCFA Treatment Strategy A single dose of CCFA (6.6 mg/kg) administered to either a single steer (1/11), or all steers (11/11) representing metaphylaxis. Individual Treatment Metaphylactic Treatment Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen None See gene column CMY-2 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.59 None 1.59 None 100 100 None None None None None
12961 12961 10302 None 10542 10.1371/journal.pone.0080575 Kanwar_2013_PLoONE Effects of ceftiofur and chlortetracycline treatment strategies on antimicrobial susceptibility and on tet(A), tet(B), and blaCMY-2 resistance genes among E. coli isolated from the feces of feedlot cattle United States of America None 10905 10905 CCFA & CTC Treatment Strategy 3 x 5 days of CTC (22 mg/kg feed) and a single dose of CCFA (6.6 mg/kg) administered to either a single steer (1/11), or all steers (11/11) representing metaphylaxis. Individual Treatment Metaphylactic Treatment Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.89 None 36.33 None 100 100 None None None None None
12962 12962 10302 None 10542 10.1371/journal.pone.0080575 Kanwar_2013_PLoONE Effects of ceftiofur and chlortetracycline treatment strategies on antimicrobial susceptibility and on tet(A), tet(B), and blaCMY-2 resistance genes among E. coli isolated from the feces of feedlot cattle United States of America None 10905 10905 CCFA & CTC Treatment Strategy 3 x 5 days of CTC (22 mg/kg feed) and a single dose of CCFA (6.6 mg/kg) administered to either a single steer (1/11), or all steers (11/11) representing metaphylaxis. Individual Treatment Metaphylactic Treatment Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen None See gene column CMY-2 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 16.73 None 100 100 None None None None None
12963 12963 10302 None 10542 10.1371/journal.pone.0080575 Kanwar_2013_PLoONE Effects of ceftiofur and chlortetracycline treatment strategies on antimicrobial susceptibility and on tet(A), tet(B), and blaCMY-2 resistance genes among E. coli isolated from the feces of feedlot cattle United States of America None 10906 10906 CCFA & CTC Use 3 x 5 days of CTC (22 mg/kg feed) and a single dose of CCFA (6.6 mg/kg). CCFA + CTC CCFA Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 36.33 None 16.18 None 100 100 None None None None None
12964 12964 10302 None 10542 10.1371/journal.pone.0080575 Kanwar_2013_PLoONE Effects of ceftiofur and chlortetracycline treatment strategies on antimicrobial susceptibility and on tet(A), tet(B), and blaCMY-2 resistance genes among E. coli isolated from the feces of feedlot cattle United States of America None 10906 10906 CCFA & CTC Use 3 x 5 days of CTC (22 mg/kg feed) and a single dose of CCFA (6.6 mg/kg). CCFA + CTC CCFA Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen None See gene column CMY-2 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 16.73 None 1.59 None 100 100 None None None None None
12965 12965 10302 None 10542 10.1371/journal.pone.0080575 Kanwar_2013_PLoONE Effects of ceftiofur and chlortetracycline treatment strategies on antimicrobial susceptibility and on tet(A), tet(B), and blaCMY-2 resistance genes among E. coli isolated from the feces of feedlot cattle United States of America None 10907 10907 CCFA Treatment Strategy A single dose of CCFA (6.6 mg/kg) administered to either a single steer (1/11), or all steers (11/11) representing metaphylaxis. Individual Treatment Metaphylactic Treatment Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 35.80 None 37.20 None 100 100 None None None None None
12966 12966 10302 None 10542 10.1371/journal.pone.0080575 Kanwar_2013_PLoONE Effects of ceftiofur and chlortetracycline treatment strategies on antimicrobial susceptibility and on tet(A), tet(B), and blaCMY-2 resistance genes among E. coli isolated from the feces of feedlot cattle United States of America None 10907 10907 CCFA Treatment Strategy A single dose of CCFA (6.6 mg/kg) administered to either a single steer (1/11), or all steers (11/11) representing metaphylaxis. Individual Treatment Metaphylactic Treatment Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Tetracyclines tet(A) Gene tet(A) Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 12.97 None 6.05 None 100 100 None None None None None
12967 12967 10302 None 10542 10.1371/journal.pone.0080575 Kanwar_2013_PLoONE Effects of ceftiofur and chlortetracycline treatment strategies on antimicrobial susceptibility and on tet(A), tet(B), and blaCMY-2 resistance genes among E. coli isolated from the feces of feedlot cattle United States of America None 10907 10907 CCFA Treatment Strategy A single dose of CCFA (6.6 mg/kg) administered to either a single steer (1/11), or all steers (11/11) representing metaphylaxis. Individual Treatment Metaphylactic Treatment Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Tetracyclines tet(B) Gene tet(B) Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 7.98 None 7.98 None 100 100 None None None None None
12968 12968 10302 None 10542 10.1371/journal.pone.0080575 Kanwar_2013_PLoONE Effects of ceftiofur and chlortetracycline treatment strategies on antimicrobial susceptibility and on tet(A), tet(B), and blaCMY-2 resistance genes among E. coli isolated from the feces of feedlot cattle United States of America None 10905 10905 CCFA & CTC Treatment Strategy 3 x 5 days of CTC (22 mg/kg feed) and a single dose of CCFA (6.6 mg/kg) administered to either a single steer (1/11), or all steers (11/11) representing metaphylaxis. Individual Treatment Metaphylactic Treatment Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 92.35 None 86.35 None 100 100 None None None None None
12969 12969 10302 None 10542 10.1371/journal.pone.0080575 Kanwar_2013_PLoONE Effects of ceftiofur and chlortetracycline treatment strategies on antimicrobial susceptibility and on tet(A), tet(B), and blaCMY-2 resistance genes among E. coli isolated from the feces of feedlot cattle United States of America None 10905 10905 CCFA & CTC Treatment Strategy 3 x 5 days of CTC (22 mg/kg feed) and a single dose of CCFA (6.6 mg/kg) administered to either a single steer (1/11), or all steers (11/11) representing metaphylaxis. Individual Treatment Metaphylactic Treatment Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Tetracyclines tet(A) Gene tet(A) Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 46.38 None 39.05 None 100 100 None None None None None
12970 12970 10302 None 10542 10.1371/journal.pone.0080575 Kanwar_2013_PLoONE Effects of ceftiofur and chlortetracycline treatment strategies on antimicrobial susceptibility and on tet(A), tet(B), and blaCMY-2 resistance genes among E. coli isolated from the feces of feedlot cattle United States of America None 10905 10905 CCFA & CTC Treatment Strategy 3 x 5 days of CTC (22 mg/kg feed) and a single dose of CCFA (6.6 mg/kg) administered to either a single steer (1/11), or all steers (11/11) representing metaphylaxis. Individual Treatment Metaphylactic Treatment Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Tetracyclines tet(B) Gene tet(B) Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 37.12 None 21.43 None 100 100 None None None None None
12971 12971 10302 None 10542 10.1371/journal.pone.0080575 Kanwar_2013_PLoONE Effects of ceftiofur and chlortetracycline treatment strategies on antimicrobial susceptibility and on tet(A), tet(B), and blaCMY-2 resistance genes among E. coli isolated from the feces of feedlot cattle United States of America None 10906 10906 CCFA & CTC Use 3 x 5 days of CTC (22 mg/kg feed) and a single dose of CCFA (6.6 mg/kg). CCFA + CTC CCFA Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 86.35 None 37.20 None 100 100 None None None None None
12972 12972 10302 None 10542 10.1371/journal.pone.0080575 Kanwar_2013_PLoONE Effects of ceftiofur and chlortetracycline treatment strategies on antimicrobial susceptibility and on tet(A), tet(B), and blaCMY-2 resistance genes among E. coli isolated from the feces of feedlot cattle United States of America None 10906 10906 CCFA & CTC Use 3 x 5 days of CTC (22 mg/kg feed) and a single dose of CCFA (6.6 mg/kg). CCFA + CTC CCFA Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Tetracyclines tet(A) Gene tet(A) Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 39.05 None 6.05 None 100 100 None None None None None
12973 12973 10302 None 10542 10.1371/journal.pone.0080575 Kanwar_2013_PLoONE Effects of ceftiofur and chlortetracycline treatment strategies on antimicrobial susceptibility and on tet(A), tet(B), and blaCMY-2 resistance genes among E. coli isolated from the feces of feedlot cattle United States of America None 10906 10906 CCFA & CTC Use 3 x 5 days of CTC (22 mg/kg feed) and a single dose of CCFA (6.6 mg/kg). CCFA + CTC CCFA Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Pen Tetracyclines tet(B) Gene tet(B) Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 21.43 None 7.98 None 100 100 None None None None None
12974 12974 10085 None 12444 10.3168/jds.2011-4337 Pereira2011 Antimicrobial resistance and prevalence of virulence factor genes in fecal Escherichia coli of Holstein calves fed milk with and without antimicrobials United States of America None 10233 10233 Growth Promoter Use Growth promoters added to milk as 1.56 ml/L sulfamethazine sodium, and 1.04 mg/L chlortetracycline. Growth Promoter Use No Growth Promoter Use Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 159 92 None None None None None
12975 12975 10085 None 12444 10.3168/jds.2011-4337 Pereira2011 Antimicrobial resistance and prevalence of virulence factor genes in fecal Escherichia coli of Holstein calves fed milk with and without antimicrobials United States of America None 10233 10233 Growth Promoter Use Growth promoters added to milk as 1.56 ml/L sulfamethazine sodium, and 1.04 mg/L chlortetracycline. Growth Promoter Use No Growth Promoter Use Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 159 92 None None None None None
12976 12976 10085 None 12444 10.3168/jds.2011-4337 Pereira2011 Antimicrobial resistance and prevalence of virulence factor genes in fecal Escherichia coli of Holstein calves fed milk with and without antimicrobials United States of America None 10233 10233 Growth Promoter Use Growth promoters added to milk as 1.56 ml/L sulfamethazine sodium, and 1.04 mg/L chlortetracycline. Growth Promoter Use No Growth Promoter Use Cattle Heifers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 159 92 None None None None None
12977 12977 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11094 11094 Biosecurity Practiced/Zones None Biosecurity Practiced Biosecurity Not Practiced Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.13 1.13 8.68 0.0102 None
12978 12978 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11096 11096 Disinfection btw. Production None Disinfection btw. Production-Always Disinfection btw. Production-Not Always Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.14 0.78 1.68 0.5036 None
12979 12979 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11096 11096 Disinfection btw. Production None Disinfection btw. Production-Always Disinfection btw. Production-Not Always Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.23 1.68 2.96 <0.0001 None
12980 12980 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11100 11100 Penicillin Use (feed) None Penicillin-Use Penicillin-No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 24 144 885 None None None None None None None None None None None
12981 12981 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11100 11100 Penicillin Use (feed) None Penicillin-Use Penicillin-No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.09 1.63 5.89 0.0011 None
12982 12982 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11101 11101 Salinomycin Use (feed) None Salinomycin-Use Salinomycin-No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.02 0.70 1.49 0.9081 None
12983 12983 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11101 11101 Salinomycin Use (feed) None Salinomycin-Use Salinomycin-No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.53 0.41 0.68 <0.0001 None
12984 12984 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11099 11099 Oxytetracycline Use (feed) None Oxytetracycline-Use Oxytetracycline-No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.85 0.91 16.27 0.0834 None
12985 12985 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11099 11099 Oxytetracycline Use (feed) None Oxytetracycline-Use Oxytetracycline-No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.64 0.15 2.83 0.7512 None
12986 12986 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11093 11093 Bambermycin (feed) None Bambermycin-Use Bambermycin-No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.15 0.39 3.39 0.7719 None
12987 12987 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11093 11093 Bambermycin (feed) None Bambermycin-Use Bambermycin-No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.90 0.37 2.18 0.8111 None
12988 12988 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11092 11092 Bacitracin (feed) None Bacitracin-Use Bacitracin-No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.85 0.60 1.21 0.3622 None
12989 12989 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11092 11092 Bacitracin (feed) None Bacitracin-Use Bacitracin-No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.87 0.69 1.09 0.219 None
12990 12990 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11091 11091 Amoxicillin Use (Water) None Amoxicillin-Use Amoxicillin-No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 7 144 902 None None None None None None None None None None None
12991 12991 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11091 11091 Amoxicillin Use (Water) None Amoxicillin-Use Amoxicillin-No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.51 0.64 3.58 0.3655 None
12992 12992 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11095 11095 Ceftiofur Use (injectable) None Ceftiofur-Use Ceftiofur-No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.43 0.17 1.09 0.046 None
12993 12993 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11095 11095 Ceftiofur Use (injectable) None Ceftiofur-Use Ceftiofur-No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 6.51 4.58 9.25 <0.0001 None
12994 12994 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11097 11097 Enrofloxacin Use (water) None Enrofloxacin-Use Enrofloxacin-No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Relative Risk Isolate None None None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
12995 12995 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11097 11097 Enrofloxacin Use (water) None Enrofloxacin-Use Enrofloxacin-No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 7.60 1.81 31.93 0.0055 None
12996 12996 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11098 11098 Gentamicin Use (injectable) None Gentamicin-Use Gentamicin-No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.62 0.22 1.76 0.3409 None
12997 12997 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11098 11098 Gentamicin Use (injectable) None Gentamicin-Use Gentamicin-No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.85 1.19 2.87 0.0086 None
12998 12998 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11102 11102 Tetracycline Use (water) None None None Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Relative Risk Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
12999 12999 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11090 11090 All in All Out Production System None AIAO System Not AIAO Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.01 0.62 1.67 0.9603 None
13000 13000 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11090 11090 All in All Out Production System None AIAO System Not AIAO Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.57 0.43 0.76 0.0002 None
13001 13001 10398 None 60000 CIPARS CIPARS DATA Canada None 11094 11094 Biosecurity Practiced/Zones None Biosecurity Practiced Biosecurity Not Practiced Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None None Salmonella spp. False None False 144 887 0 22 None None None None None None None None None None None
13008 13008 10017 None 10604 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1987.tb02674.x Kaukas1987 The effect of ampicillin and tylosin on the faecal enterococci of healthy young chickens United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10055 10055 Tylosin use 550 mg/l tylosin in water for 5 days. Measurement used at day 23 Tylosin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None 78.00 None 53.00 None 5 5 None None None None None
40212 40212 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11324 11324 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
13009 13009 10017 None 10604 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1987.tb02674.x Kaukas1987 The effect of ampicillin and tylosin on the faecal enterococci of healthy young chickens United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10054 10054 Ampicillin use 180 mg/l ampicillin in water for 5 days. Measurement used at day 23. Ampicillin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None 78.00 None 53.00 None 5 5 None None None None None
13010 13010 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10400 10400 Antimicorbial use Any antimicrobial use Any antimicrobial use No use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 132 131 None None None None None
13011 13011 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10400 10400 Antimicorbial use Any antimicrobial use Any antimicrobial use No use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 132 131 None None None None None
13012 13012 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10399 10399 Antimicorbial use Any antimicrobial use Any antimicrobial use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella None False None False 4 None 6 None None None None None 132 131 None None None None None
13013 13013 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10399 10399 Antimicorbial use Any antimicrobial use Any antimicrobial use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides apramycin None Salmonella None False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 132 131 None None None None None
13014 13014 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10399 10399 Antimicorbial use Any antimicrobial use Any antimicrobial use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Salmonella None False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 132 131 None None None None None
13015 13015 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10399 10399 Antimicorbial use Any antimicrobial use Any antimicrobial use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella None False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 132 131 None None None None None
13016 13016 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10399 10399 Antimicorbial use Any antimicrobial use Any antimicrobial use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella None False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 132 131 None None None None None
13017 13017 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10399 10399 Antimicorbial use Any antimicrobial use Any antimicrobial use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella None False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 132 131 None None None None None
13018 13018 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10399 10399 Antimicorbial use Any antimicrobial use Any antimicrobial use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Salmonella None False None False 2 None 8 None None None None None 132 131 None None None None None
13019 13019 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10399 10399 Antimicorbial use Any antimicrobial use Any antimicrobial use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins piperacillin None Salmonella None False None False 2 None 8 None None None None None 132 131 None None None None None
13020 13020 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10399 10399 Antimicorbial use Any antimicrobial use Any antimicrobial use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethizole None Salmonella None False None False 7 None 8 None None None None None 132 131 None None None None None
13021 13021 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10399 10399 Antimicorbial use Any antimicrobial use Any antimicrobial use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella None False None False 28 None 33 None None None None None 132 131 None None None None None
13022 13022 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10399 10399 Antimicorbial use Any antimicrobial use Any antimicrobial use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ticarcillin None Salmonella None False None False 4 None 5 None None None None None 132 131 None None None None None
13023 13023 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10399 10399 Antimicorbial use Any antimicrobial use Any antimicrobial use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ticarcillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella None False None False 2 None 1 None None None None None 132 131 None None None None None
13024 13024 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10399 10399 Antimicorbial use Any antimicrobial use Any antimicrobial use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella None False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 132 131 None None None None None
13025 13025 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10402 10402 Antimicorbial use Tetracycline use Vs No use Tetracycline use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Salmonella None False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 21 131 None None None None None
13026 13026 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10402 10402 Antimicorbial use Tetracycline use Vs No use Tetracycline use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella None False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 21 131 None None None None None
13027 13027 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10402 10402 Antimicorbial use Tetracycline use Vs No use Tetracycline use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella None False None False 1 None 6 None None None None None 21 131 None None None None None
13028 13028 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10402 10402 Antimicorbial use Tetracycline use Vs No use Tetracycline use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides apramycin None Salmonella None False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 21 131 None None None None None
13029 13029 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10402 10402 Antimicorbial use Tetracycline use Vs No use Tetracycline use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Salmonella None False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 21 131 None None None None None
13030 13030 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10402 10402 Antimicorbial use Tetracycline use Vs No use Tetracycline use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella None False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 21 131 None None None None None
13031 13031 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10402 10402 Antimicorbial use Tetracycline use Vs No use Tetracycline use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella None False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 21 131 None None None None None
13032 13032 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10402 10402 Antimicorbial use Tetracycline use Vs No use Tetracycline use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella None False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 21 131 None None None None None
13033 13033 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10402 10402 Antimicorbial use Tetracycline use Vs No use Tetracycline use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Salmonella None False None False 1 None 8 None None None None None 21 131 None None None None None
13034 13034 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10402 10402 Antimicorbial use Tetracycline use Vs No use Tetracycline use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins piperacillin None Salmonella None False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 21 131 None None None None None
13035 13035 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10402 10402 Antimicorbial use Tetracycline use Vs No use Tetracycline use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella None False None False 1 None 8 None None None None None 21 131 None None None None None
13036 13036 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10402 10402 Antimicorbial use Tetracycline use Vs No use Tetracycline use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella None False None False 3 None 33 None None None None None 21 131 None None None None None
13037 13037 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10402 10402 Antimicorbial use Tetracycline use Vs No use Tetracycline use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ticarcillin None Salmonella None False None False 1 None 5 None None None None None 21 131 None None None None None
13038 13038 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10402 10402 Antimicorbial use Tetracycline use Vs No use Tetracycline use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ticarcillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella None False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 21 131 None None None None None
13039 13039 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10402 10402 Antimicorbial use Tetracycline use Vs No use Tetracycline use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella None False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 21 131 None None None None None
13040 13040 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10402 10402 Antimicorbial use Tetracycline use Vs No use Tetracycline use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella None False None False 0 None 3 None None None None None 21 131 None None None None None
13041 13041 10149 None 8678 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268 Dargatz2002 Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots United States of America Observational 10401 10401 Antimicorbial use any antimicrobial use Vs No use any antimicrobial use No use Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella None False None False 1 None 3 None None None None None 132 131 None None None None None
13043 13043 10310 None 11369 10.1089/fpd.2011.0925 Lutz_2011_FooPatandDis Ceftiofur use in finishing swine barns and the recovery of fecal Escherichia coli or Salmonella spp. Resistant to ceftriaxone United States of America Observational 10925 10925 Ceftiofur use Rare vs common, exact levels of ceftiofur use not recorded Rare ceftiofur use Common ceftiofur use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.32 0.74 2.70 0.31 None
13044 13044 10310 None 11369 10.1089/fpd.2011.0925 Lutz_2011_FooPatandDis Ceftiofur use in finishing swine barns and the recovery of fecal Escherichia coli or Salmonella spp. Resistant to ceftriaxone United States of America Observational 10925 10925 Ceftiofur use Rare vs common, exact levels of ceftiofur use not recorded Rare ceftiofur use Common ceftiofur use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.68 0.22 2.20 0.51 None
13045 13045 10310 None 11369 10.1089/fpd.2011.0925 Lutz_2011_FooPatandDis Ceftiofur use in finishing swine barns and the recovery of fecal Escherichia coli or Salmonella spp. Resistant to ceftriaxone United States of America Observational 10923 10923 Ceftiofur use Moderate vs common, exact levels of ceftiofur use not recorded (grow-finish pigs) Rare ceftiofur use Common ceftiofur use Swine None None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia None False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.40 0.74 2.70 0.31 None
13046 13046 10310 None 11369 10.1089/fpd.2011.0925 Lutz_2011_FooPatandDis Ceftiofur use in finishing swine barns and the recovery of fecal Escherichia coli or Salmonella spp. Resistant to ceftriaxone United States of America Observational 10924 10924 Ceftiofur use Moderate vs common, exact levels of ceftiofur use not recorded (grow-finish pigs) Rare ceftiofur use Common ceftiofur use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.02 0.00 0.18 0.001 None
13047 13047 10315 None 11965 Nair_2018_CanaVeteJour A clinical trial investigating the impact of in-feed flavophospholipol on Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance in pigs Canada Experimental 10934 10934 Flavophospholipol use 4 ppm in feed (grow-finish pigs) for 10 weeks. Week 4 is latest data presented for Salmonella. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella None False None False None None None None 40.00 None 85.00 None 5 7 None None None None None
13048 13048 10315 None 11965 Nair_2018_CanaVeteJour A clinical trial investigating the impact of in-feed flavophospholipol on Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance in pigs Canada Experimental 10934 10934 Flavophospholipol use 4 ppm in feed (grow-finish pigs) for 10 weeks. Week 4 is latest data presented for Salmonella. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella None False None False None None None None 100.00 None 85.00 None 5 7 None None None None None
13049 13049 10315 None 11965 Nair_2018_CanaVeteJour A clinical trial investigating the impact of in-feed flavophospholipol on Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance in pigs Canada Experimental 10934 10934 Flavophospholipol use 4 ppm in feed (grow-finish pigs) for 10 weeks. Week 4 is latest data presented for Salmonella. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella None False None False None None None None 80.00 None 71.00 None 5 7 None None None None None
13050 13050 10315 None 11965 Nair_2018_CanaVeteJour A clinical trial investigating the impact of in-feed flavophospholipol on Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance in pigs Canada Experimental 10934 10934 Flavophospholipol use 4 ppm in feed (grow-finish pigs) for 10 weeks. Week 4 is latest data presented for Salmonella. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Salmonella None False None False None None None None 80.00 None 71.00 None 5 7 None None None None None
13051 13051 10315 None 11965 Nair_2018_CanaVeteJour A clinical trial investigating the impact of in-feed flavophospholipol on Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance in pigs Canada Experimental 10933 10933 Flavophospholipol use 4 ppm in feed (grow-finish pigs) for 10 weeks. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia None False None False None None None None 11.00 None 0.00 None 18 14 None None None None None
13052 13052 10315 None 11965 Nair_2018_CanaVeteJour A clinical trial investigating the impact of in-feed flavophospholipol on Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance in pigs Canada Experimental 10933 10933 Flavophospholipol use 4 ppm in feed (grow-finish pigs) for 10 weeks. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia None False None False None None None None 84.00 None 93.00 None 18 14 None None None None None
13053 13053 10315 None 11965 Nair_2018_CanaVeteJour A clinical trial investigating the impact of in-feed flavophospholipol on Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance in pigs Canada Experimental 10933 10933 Flavophospholipol use 4 ppm in feed (grow-finish pigs) for 10 weeks. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia None False None False None None None None 5.00 None 0.00 None 18 14 None None None None None
13054 13054 10315 None 11965 Nair_2018_CanaVeteJour A clinical trial investigating the impact of in-feed flavophospholipol on Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance in pigs Canada Experimental 10933 10933 Flavophospholipol use 4 ppm in feed (grow-finish pigs) for 10 weeks. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia None False None False None None None None 26.00 None 43.00 None 18 14 None None None None None
13055 13055 10315 None 11965 Nair_2018_CanaVeteJour A clinical trial investigating the impact of in-feed flavophospholipol on Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance in pigs Canada Experimental 10933 10933 Flavophospholipol use 4 ppm in feed (grow-finish pigs) for 10 weeks. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia None False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 18 14 None None None None None
13056 13056 10315 None 11965 Nair_2018_CanaVeteJour A clinical trial investigating the impact of in-feed flavophospholipol on Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance in pigs Canada Experimental 10933 10933 Flavophospholipol use 4 ppm in feed (grow-finish pigs) for 10 weeks. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia None False None False None None None None 11.00 None 7.00 None 18 14 None None None None None
13057 13057 10315 None 11965 Nair_2018_CanaVeteJour A clinical trial investigating the impact of in-feed flavophospholipol on Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance in pigs Canada Experimental 10933 10933 Flavophospholipol use 4 ppm in feed (grow-finish pigs) for 10 weeks. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia None False None False None None None None 5.00 None 7.00 None 18 14 None None None None None
13058 13058 10315 None 11965 Nair_2018_CanaVeteJour A clinical trial investigating the impact of in-feed flavophospholipol on Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance in pigs Canada Experimental 10933 10933 Flavophospholipol use 4 ppm in feed (grow-finish pigs) for 10 weeks. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia None False None False None None None None 74.00 None 93.00 None 18 14 None None None None None
13059 13059 10315 None 11965 Nair_2018_CanaVeteJour A clinical trial investigating the impact of in-feed flavophospholipol on Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance in pigs Canada Experimental 10933 10933 Flavophospholipol use 4 ppm in feed (grow-finish pigs) for 10 weeks. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Escherichia None False None False None None None None 68.00 None 71.00 None 18 14 None None None None None
13060 13060 10315 None 11965 Nair_2018_CanaVeteJour A clinical trial investigating the impact of in-feed flavophospholipol on Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance in pigs Canada Experimental 10933 10933 Flavophospholipol use 4 ppm in feed (grow-finish pigs) for 10 weeks. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia None False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 18 14 None None None None None
13061 13061 10315 None 11965 Nair_2018_CanaVeteJour A clinical trial investigating the impact of in-feed flavophospholipol on Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance in pigs Canada Experimental 10933 10933 Flavophospholipol use 4 ppm in feed (grow-finish pigs) for 10 weeks. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.00 None 57.00 None 18 14 None None None None None
13062 13062 10459 None None TEST The Test Reference None None 11108 11108 This is a test factor. This is to test if the cascading dropdowns are working as intended! None None Chicken Eggs None None Abattoir Retail None None Monobactams carumonam None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
13065 13065 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10949 10949 Enrofloxacin use 50 mg, injected. Predominantly C. coli (98.3%). Enrofloxacin use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 27 None 78 None None None None None 45 431 None None None None None
13066 13066 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10949 10949 Enrofloxacin use 50 mg, injected. Predominantly C. coli (98.3%). Enrofloxacin use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter coli False None False 27 None 74 None None None None None 45 431 None None None None None
13067 13067 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10950 10950 Enrofloxacin use 50 mg, injected. Predominantly C. coli (98.3%). Enrofloxacin use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter coli False None False 5 None 0 None None None None None 60 142 None None None None None
13068 13068 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10950 10950 Enrofloxacin use 50 mg, injected. Predominantly C. coli (98.3%). Enrofloxacin use No use Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 5 None 0 None None None None None 60 142 None None None None None
13069 13069 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10951 10951 Lincomycin use 32 mg, in water. Predominantly C. coli (98.3%). Lincomycin use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Lincosamides clindamycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 1 None 15 None None None None None 45 431 None None None None None
13070 13070 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10952 10952 Oxytetracycline use 400g/ton, in feed. Predominantly C. coli (98.3%). Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False 348 None 88 None None None None None 386 90 None None None None None
13072 13072 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10956 10956 Tiamulin use 35 g/ton, in feed. Predominantly C. coli (98.3%). Tiamulin use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides azithromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 76 None 42 None None None None None 386 90 None None None None None
13073 13073 10322 None 12640 10.1128/AEM.07723-11 Quintana.Hayashi_2012_AppandEnvMic Longitudinal study of the persistence of antimicrobial-resistant Campylobacter strains in distinct swine production systems on farms, at slaughter, and in the environment United States of America Observational 10956 10956 Tiamulin use 35 g/ton, in feed. Predominantly C. coli (98.3%). Tiamulin use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 76 None 42 None None None None None 386 90 None None None None None
13074 13074 10352 None 7595 10.3168/jds.2017-13277 Awosile_2018_JoofDaSc Salmonella enterica and extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from Holstein dairy calves from 8 farms in New Brunswick, Canada Canada Observational 11044 11044 Antimicrobial use Regular ceftifur use on farm ceftiofur use no use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate None None None None None False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.83 2.29 6.39 None None
13075 13075 10352 None 7595 10.3168/jds.2017-13277 Awosile_2018_JoofDaSc Salmonella enterica and extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from Holstein dairy calves from 8 farms in New Brunswick, Canada Canada Observational 11051 11051 No. of calves/herd Small (<23) or Large (>/=23) Large small Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.77 None None 0.07 None
13076 13076 10352 None 7595 10.3168/jds.2017-13277 Awosile_2018_JoofDaSc Salmonella enterica and extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from Holstein dairy calves from 8 farms in New Brunswick, Canada Canada Observational 11052 11052 No. of cows/herd Small (<23) or Large (>/=23) Large Small Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.00 None None <0.001 None
13077 13077 10352 None 7595 10.3168/jds.2017-13277 Awosile_2018_JoofDaSc Salmonella enterica and extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from Holstein dairy calves from 8 farms in New Brunswick, Canada Canada Observational 11053 11053 Pre weaned calve housing Calf hutch vs. group Group hutch Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None None None False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.10 None None 0.526 None
13078 13078 10352 None 7595 10.3168/jds.2017-13277 Awosile_2018_JoofDaSc Salmonella enterica and extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from Holstein dairy calves from 8 farms in New Brunswick, Canada Canada Observational 11050 11050 Lactating cow housing Freestall vs. tiestall Tiestall Freestall Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.10 None None <0.001 None
13079 13079 10352 None 7595 10.3168/jds.2017-13277 Awosile_2018_JoofDaSc Salmonella enterica and extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from Holstein dairy calves from 8 farms in New Brunswick, Canada Canada Observational 11054 11054 Sick cows housed separately from other cows Yes vs. no Yes No Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.89 None None 0.475 None
13080 13080 10352 None 7595 10.3168/jds.2017-13277 Awosile_2018_JoofDaSc Salmonella enterica and extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from Holstein dairy calves from 8 farms in New Brunswick, Canada Canada Observational 11048 11048 Feeding of unpasteurized milk to calves Yes vs. no Yes no Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.72 None None <0.001 None
13081 13081 10352 None 7595 10.3168/jds.2017-13277 Awosile_2018_JoofDaSc Salmonella enterica and extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from Holstein dairy calves from 8 farms in New Brunswick, Canada Canada Observational 11049 11049 Frequency of ceftiofur use Occasionally vs. regularly Regularly Occasionally Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.89 None None <0.001 None
13082 13082 10352 None 7595 10.3168/jds.2017-13277 Awosile_2018_JoofDaSc Salmonella enterica and extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from Holstein dairy calves from 8 farms in New Brunswick, Canada Canada Observational 11046 11046 Antimicrobial use Use of ceftiofur for lameness Antimicorbial use No use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.83 None None 0.226 None
13084 13084 10352 None 7595 10.3168/jds.2017-13277 Awosile_2018_JoofDaSc Salmonella enterica and extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from Holstein dairy calves from 8 farms in New Brunswick, Canada Canada Observational 11042 11042 Antimicorbial use Use of ceftiofur for respiratory diseases Antimicorbial use no use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.66 None None 0.004 None
13085 13085 10352 None 7595 10.3168/jds.2017-13277 Awosile_2018_JoofDaSc Salmonella enterica and extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from Holstein dairy calves from 8 farms in New Brunswick, Canada Canada Observational 11043 11043 Antimicorbial use Use of ceftiofur for scours Antimicorbial use no use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.45 None None <0.001 None
13086 13086 10352 None 7595 10.3168/jds.2017-13277 Awosile_2018_JoofDaSc Salmonella enterica and extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from Holstein dairy calves from 8 farms in New Brunswick, Canada Canada Observational 11041 11041 Antimicorbial use Use of ceftiofur for metritis/retained placenta Antimicorbial use no use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.71 None None 0.016 None
13087 13087 10352 None 7595 10.3168/jds.2017-13277 Awosile_2018_JoofDaSc Salmonella enterica and extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from Holstein dairy calves from 8 farms in New Brunswick, Canada Canada Observational 11040 11040 Antimicorbial use Use of ceftiofur for anorexia/general infection Antimicorbial use No use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.85 None None 0.305 None
13088 13088 10352 None 7595 10.3168/jds.2017-13277 Awosile_2018_JoofDaSc Salmonella enterica and extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from Holstein dairy calves from 8 farms in New Brunswick, Canada Canada Observational 11045 11045 Antimicrobial use Use of ceftiofur for foot rot Antimicorbial use No use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.65 None None 0.006 None
13089 13089 10352 None 7595 10.3168/jds.2017-13277 Awosile_2018_JoofDaSc Salmonella enterica and extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from Holstein dairy calves from 8 farms in New Brunswick, Canada Canada Observational 11037 11037 Antimicorbial use Florfenicol use Antimicorbial use No use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.43 None None 0.016 None
13090 13090 10352 None 7595 10.3168/jds.2017-13277 Awosile_2018_JoofDaSc Salmonella enterica and extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from Holstein dairy calves from 8 farms in New Brunswick, Canada Canada Observational 11037 11037 Antimicorbial use Florfenicol use Antimicorbial use No use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.96 None None 0.001 None
13091 13091 10352 None 7595 10.3168/jds.2017-13277 Awosile_2018_JoofDaSc Salmonella enterica and extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from Holstein dairy calves from 8 farms in New Brunswick, Canada Canada Observational 11047 11047 Antimicrobial use Use of ceftiofur for mastitis Antimicoribal use No use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.00 None None <0.001 None
13092 13092 10352 None 7595 10.3168/jds.2017-13277 Awosile_2018_JoofDaSc Salmonella enterica and extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from Holstein dairy calves from 8 farms in New Brunswick, Canada Canada Observational 11038 11038 Antimicorbial use Trimethoprim-sulfadoxine use Antimicorbial use No use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.00 None None 0.007 None
13093 13093 10352 None 7595 10.3168/jds.2017-13277 Awosile_2018_JoofDaSc Salmonella enterica and extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from Holstein dairy calves from 8 farms in New Brunswick, Canada Canada Observational 11039 11039 Antimicorbial use Tulathromycin use Antimicrobial use no use Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.56 None None 0.009 None
13094 13094 10377 None 14738 10.1089/fpd.2011.0852 Zhang_2011_FooPatandDis Contamination Rates and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococcus spp., Escherichia coli , and Salmonella Isolated from No Antibiotics AddedLabeled Chicken Products United States of America Observational 11083 11083 Production Type Conventional vs no antibiotics added production. E. coli (n=190) isolates from retail chicken samples were chosen at random (~2 isolates from each E.coli-positive sample). Antibiotic-free Production Conventional Production Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 23.70 None 44.10 None 97 93 None None None None None
13095 13095 10377 None 14738 10.1089/fpd.2011.0852 Zhang_2011_FooPatandDis Contamination Rates and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococcus spp., Escherichia coli , and Salmonella Isolated from No Antibiotics AddedLabeled Chicken Products United States of America Observational 11085 11085 Production Type Conventional vs no antibiotics added production. Enterococcus spp. (n=113) isolates from retail chicken samples were chosen at random (~2 isolates from each Enterococcus spp.-positive sample). Antibiotic-free Production Conventional Production Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 20.60 None 44.40 None 68 45 None None None None None
13096 13096 10377 None 14738 10.1089/fpd.2011.0852 Zhang_2011_FooPatandDis Contamination Rates and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococcus spp., Escherichia coli , and Salmonella Isolated from No Antibiotics AddedLabeled Chicken Products United States of America Observational 11085 11085 Production Type Conventional vs no antibiotics added production. Enterococcus spp. (n=113) isolates from retail chicken samples were chosen at random (~2 isolates from each Enterococcus spp.-positive sample). Antibiotic-free Production Conventional Production Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 4.40 None 24.40 None 68 45 None None None None None
13097 13097 10377 None 14738 10.1089/fpd.2011.0852 Zhang_2011_FooPatandDis Contamination Rates and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococcus spp., Escherichia coli , and Salmonella Isolated from No Antibiotics AddedLabeled Chicken Products United States of America Observational 11085 11085 Production Type Conventional vs no antibiotics added production. Enterococcus spp. (n=113) isolates from retail chicken samples were chosen at random (~2 isolates from each Enterococcus spp.-positive sample). Antibiotic-free Production Conventional Production Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 19.10 None 35.60 None 68 45 None None None None None
13098 13098 10377 None 14738 10.1089/fpd.2011.0852 Zhang_2011_FooPatandDis Contamination Rates and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococcus spp., Escherichia coli , and Salmonella Isolated from No Antibiotics AddedLabeled Chicken Products United States of America Observational 11085 11085 Production Type Conventional vs no antibiotics added production. Enterococcus spp. (n=113) isolates from retail chicken samples were chosen at random (~2 isolates from each Enterococcus spp.-positive sample). Antibiotic-free Production Conventional Production Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 11.80 None 2.20 None 68 45 None None None None None
13099 13099 10377 None 14738 10.1089/fpd.2011.0852 Zhang_2011_FooPatandDis Contamination Rates and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococcus spp., Escherichia coli , and Salmonella Isolated from No Antibiotics AddedLabeled Chicken Products United States of America Observational 11085 11085 Production Type Conventional vs no antibiotics added production. Enterococcus spp. (n=113) isolates from retail chicken samples were chosen at random (~2 isolates from each Enterococcus spp.-positive sample). Antibiotic-free Production Conventional Production Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Other False None False 11 None 18 None None None None None 68 45 None None None None None
13100 13100 10377 None 14738 10.1089/fpd.2011.0852 Zhang_2011_FooPatandDis Contamination Rates and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococcus spp., Escherichia coli , and Salmonella Isolated from No Antibiotics AddedLabeled Chicken Products United States of America Observational 11086 11086 Production Type Conventional vs no antibiotics added production. Enterococcus spp. (n=113) isolates from retail chicken samples were chosen at random (~2 isolates from each Enterococcus spp.-positive sample). Resistance assayed for tylosin tartrate. Antibiotic-free Production Conventional Production Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus Other False None False 6 None 13 None None None None None 68 45 None None None None None
13101 13101 10377 None 14738 10.1089/fpd.2011.0852 Zhang_2011_FooPatandDis Contamination Rates and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococcus spp., Escherichia coli , and Salmonella Isolated from No Antibiotics AddedLabeled Chicken Products United States of America Observational 11084 11084 Production Type Conventional vs no antibiotics added production. Enterococcus spp. (n=113) isolates from retail chicken samples were chosen at random (~2 isolates from each Enterococcus spp.-positive sample). Antibiotic-free Production Conventional Production Chicken None None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus None False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 68 45 None None None None None
13102 13102 10377 None 14738 10.1089/fpd.2011.0852 Zhang_2011_FooPatandDis Contamination Rates and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococcus spp., Escherichia coli , and Salmonella Isolated from No Antibiotics AddedLabeled Chicken Products United States of America Observational 11083 11083 Production Type Conventional vs no antibiotics added production. E. coli (n=190) isolates from retail chicken samples were chosen at random (~2 isolates from each E.coli-positive sample). Antibiotic-free Production Conventional Production Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 24 None 33 None None None None None 97 93 None None None None None
13103 13103 10377 None 14738 10.1089/fpd.2011.0852 Zhang_2011_FooPatandDis Contamination Rates and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococcus spp., Escherichia coli , and Salmonella Isolated from No Antibiotics AddedLabeled Chicken Products United States of America Observational 11083 11083 Production Type Conventional vs no antibiotics added production. E. coli (n=190) isolates from retail chicken samples were chosen at random (~2 isolates from each E.coli-positive sample). Antibiotic-free Production Conventional Production Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 10 None 5 None None None None None 97 93 None None None None None
13104 13104 10377 None 14738 10.1089/fpd.2011.0852 Zhang_2011_FooPatandDis Contamination Rates and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococcus spp., Escherichia coli , and Salmonella Isolated from No Antibiotics AddedLabeled Chicken Products United States of America Observational 11083 11083 Production Type Conventional vs no antibiotics added production. E. coli (n=190) isolates from retail chicken samples were chosen at random (~2 isolates from each E.coli-positive sample). Antibiotic-free Production Conventional Production Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 7 None 4 None None None None None 97 93 None None None None None
13105 13105 10260 None 8188 10.1128/AEM.03916-14 Cameron.Veas_2015_AppandEnvMic Impact of the use of -lactam antimicrobials on the emergence of Escherichia coli isolates resistant to cephalosporins under standard pig-rearing conditions Spain Experimental 10794 10794 Ceftiofur use 5 mg/kg of body weight parenterally during preweaning. Sampling day 14 (pigs age 20-22 days) Ceftiofur use No use Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 1 None None None None None 50 50 None None None None None
13106 13106 10260 None 8188 10.1128/AEM.03916-14 Cameron.Veas_2015_AppandEnvMic Impact of the use of -lactam antimicrobials on the emergence of Escherichia coli isolates resistant to cephalosporins under standard pig-rearing conditions Spain Experimental 10792 10792 Ceftiofur use 5 mg/kg of body weight parenterally during preweaning (pigs age 77 days) Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13107 13107 10260 None 8188 10.1128/AEM.03916-14 Cameron.Veas_2015_AppandEnvMic Impact of the use of -lactam antimicrobials on the emergence of Escherichia coli isolates resistant to cephalosporins under standard pig-rearing conditions Spain Experimental 10788 10788 Amoxicillin use 10 mg/kg of body weight/day in feed for 14 days (pigs age 77 days) Amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 7 None 0 None None None None None 26 20 None None None None None
13108 13108 10260 None 8188 10.1128/AEM.03916-14 Cameron.Veas_2015_AppandEnvMic Impact of the use of -lactam antimicrobials on the emergence of Escherichia coli isolates resistant to cephalosporins under standard pig-rearing conditions Spain Experimental 10793 10793 Ceftiofur use 5 mg/kg of body weight parenterally during preweaning. Pigs age 155 days Ceftiofur use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13109 13109 10260 None 8188 10.1128/AEM.03916-14 Cameron.Veas_2015_AppandEnvMic Impact of the use of -lactam antimicrobials on the emergence of Escherichia coli isolates resistant to cephalosporins under standard pig-rearing conditions Spain Experimental 10789 10789 Amoxicillin use 10 mg/kg of body weight/day in feed for 14 days days (pigs age 155 days) Amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 26 20 None None None None None
13110 13110 10260 None 8188 10.1128/AEM.03916-14 Cameron.Veas_2015_AppandEnvMic Impact of the use of -lactam antimicrobials on the emergence of Escherichia coli isolates resistant to cephalosporins under standard pig-rearing conditions Spain Experimental 10791 10791 Ceftiofur + Amoxicillin Use 5 mg/kg ceftiofur of body weight parenterally during preweaning + 10 mg/kg of body weight/day amoxicillin in feed for 14 days. Pigs sampled at age 84 Ceftiofur + Amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13111 13111 10260 None 8188 10.1128/AEM.03916-14 Cameron.Veas_2015_AppandEnvMic Impact of the use of -lactam antimicrobials on the emergence of Escherichia coli isolates resistant to cephalosporins under standard pig-rearing conditions Spain Experimental 10790 10790 Ceftiofur + Amoxicillin Use 5 mg/kg ceftiofur of body weight parenterally during preweaning + 10 mg/kg of body weight/day amoxicillin in feed for 14 days. Pigs sampled at age 155 Ceftiofur + Amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13113 13113 10271 None 8560 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1981.tb00708.x Cosgrove_1981_JoofVePhanTh A study of fluctuations in Escherichia coli sensitivity patterns from pigs fed a halquinol supplemented diet United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10809 10809 Halquinol use 120 g halquinol/tonne finished feed. Sampled at day 42. Basal feed contained copper at 180 p.p.m. After 42 days, pigs placed on grower feed containing 66 p.p.m. of both chlortetracycline hydrochloride + sulpha- dimidine, + 32.8 p.p,m. procaine penicillin Halquinol use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines chlortetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 90 90 None None None None None
13114 13114 10271 None 8560 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1981.tb00708.x Cosgrove_1981_JoofVePhanTh A study of fluctuations in Escherichia coli sensitivity patterns from pigs fed a halquinol supplemented diet United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10810 10810 Halquinol use 120 g halquinol/tonne finished feed. Sampled at day 59. Basal feed contained copper at 180 p.p.m. After 42 days, pigs placed on grower feed containing 66 p.p.m. of both chlortetracycline hydrochloride + sulpha- dimidine, + 32.8 p.p,m. procaine penicillin Halquinol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines chlortetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 98.00 None 90 90 None None None None None
13115 13115 10271 None 8560 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1981.tb00708.x Cosgrove_1981_JoofVePhanTh A study of fluctuations in Escherichia coli sensitivity patterns from pigs fed a halquinol supplemented diet United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10809 10809 Halquinol use 120 g halquinol/tonne finished feed. Sampled at day 42. Basal feed contained copper at 180 p.p.m. After 42 days, pigs placed on grower feed containing 66 p.p.m. of both chlortetracycline hydrochloride + sulpha- dimidine, + 32.8 p.p,m. procaine penicillin Halquinol use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 16.00 None 37.00 None 90 90 None None None None None
13116 13116 10271 None 8560 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1981.tb00708.x Cosgrove_1981_JoofVePhanTh A study of fluctuations in Escherichia coli sensitivity patterns from pigs fed a halquinol supplemented diet United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10810 10810 Halquinol use 120 g halquinol/tonne finished feed. Sampled at day 59. Basal feed contained copper at 180 p.p.m. After 42 days, pigs placed on grower feed containing 66 p.p.m. of both chlortetracycline hydrochloride + sulpha- dimidine, + 32.8 p.p,m. procaine penicillin Halquinol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 90 90 None None None None None
13117 13117 10271 None 8560 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1981.tb00708.x Cosgrove_1981_JoofVePhanTh A study of fluctuations in Escherichia coli sensitivity patterns from pigs fed a halquinol supplemented diet United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10809 10809 Halquinol use 120 g halquinol/tonne finished feed. Sampled at day 42. Basal feed contained copper at 180 p.p.m. After 42 days, pigs placed on grower feed containing 66 p.p.m. of both chlortetracycline hydrochloride + sulpha- dimidine, + 32.8 p.p,m. procaine penicillin Halquinol use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 18.00 None 25.00 None 90 90 None None None None None
13118 13118 10271 None 8560 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1981.tb00708.x Cosgrove_1981_JoofVePhanTh A study of fluctuations in Escherichia coli sensitivity patterns from pigs fed a halquinol supplemented diet United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10810 10810 Halquinol use 120 g halquinol/tonne finished feed. Sampled at day 59. Basal feed contained copper at 180 p.p.m. After 42 days, pigs placed on grower feed containing 66 p.p.m. of both chlortetracycline hydrochloride + sulpha- dimidine, + 32.8 p.p,m. procaine penicillin Halquinol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 90 90 None None None None None
13119 13119 10271 None 8560 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1981.tb00708.x Cosgrove_1981_JoofVePhanTh A study of fluctuations in Escherichia coli sensitivity patterns from pigs fed a halquinol supplemented diet United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10809 10809 Halquinol use 120 g halquinol/tonne finished feed. Sampled at day 42. Basal feed contained copper at 180 p.p.m. After 42 days, pigs placed on grower feed containing 66 p.p.m. of both chlortetracycline hydrochloride + sulpha- dimidine, + 32.8 p.p,m. procaine penicillin Halquinol use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 90 90 None None None None None
13120 13120 10271 None 8560 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1981.tb00708.x Cosgrove_1981_JoofVePhanTh A study of fluctuations in Escherichia coli sensitivity patterns from pigs fed a halquinol supplemented diet United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10810 10810 Halquinol use 120 g halquinol/tonne finished feed. Sampled at day 59. Basal feed contained copper at 180 p.p.m. After 42 days, pigs placed on grower feed containing 66 p.p.m. of both chlortetracycline hydrochloride + sulpha- dimidine, + 32.8 p.p,m. procaine penicillin Halquinol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 95.00 None 100.00 None 90 90 None None None None None
13121 13121 10271 None 8560 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1981.tb00708.x Cosgrove_1981_JoofVePhanTh A study of fluctuations in Escherichia coli sensitivity patterns from pigs fed a halquinol supplemented diet United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10809 10809 Halquinol use 120 g halquinol/tonne finished feed. Sampled at day 42. Basal feed contained copper at 180 p.p.m. After 42 days, pigs placed on grower feed containing 66 p.p.m. of both chlortetracycline hydrochloride + sulpha- dimidine, + 32.8 p.p,m. procaine penicillin Halquinol use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 21.00 None 32.00 None 90 90 None None None None None
13122 13122 10271 None 8560 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1981.tb00708.x Cosgrove_1981_JoofVePhanTh A study of fluctuations in Escherichia coli sensitivity patterns from pigs fed a halquinol supplemented diet United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10810 10810 Halquinol use 120 g halquinol/tonne finished feed. Sampled at day 59. Basal feed contained copper at 180 p.p.m. After 42 days, pigs placed on grower feed containing 66 p.p.m. of both chlortetracycline hydrochloride + sulpha- dimidine, + 32.8 p.p,m. procaine penicillin Halquinol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.00 None 7.00 None 90 90 None None None None None
13123 13123 10271 None 8560 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1981.tb00708.x Cosgrove_1981_JoofVePhanTh A study of fluctuations in Escherichia coli sensitivity patterns from pigs fed a halquinol supplemented diet United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10809 10809 Halquinol use 120 g halquinol/tonne finished feed. Sampled at day 42. Basal feed contained copper at 180 p.p.m. After 42 days, pigs placed on grower feed containing 66 p.p.m. of both chlortetracycline hydrochloride + sulpha- dimidine, + 32.8 p.p,m. procaine penicillin Halquinol use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives furazolidone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 90 90 None None None None None
13124 13124 10271 None 8560 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1981.tb00708.x Cosgrove_1981_JoofVePhanTh A study of fluctuations in Escherichia coli sensitivity patterns from pigs fed a halquinol supplemented diet United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10810 10810 Halquinol use 120 g halquinol/tonne finished feed. Sampled at day 59. Basal feed contained copper at 180 p.p.m. After 42 days, pigs placed on grower feed containing 66 p.p.m. of both chlortetracycline hydrochloride + sulpha- dimidine, + 32.8 p.p,m. procaine penicillin Halquinol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives furazolidone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 91.00 None 95.00 None 90 90 None None None None None
13125 13125 10271 None 8560 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1981.tb00708.x Cosgrove_1981_JoofVePhanTh A study of fluctuations in Escherichia coli sensitivity patterns from pigs fed a halquinol supplemented diet United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10809 10809 Halquinol use 120 g halquinol/tonne finished feed. Sampled at day 42. Basal feed contained copper at 180 p.p.m. After 42 days, pigs placed on grower feed containing 66 p.p.m. of both chlortetracycline hydrochloride + sulpha- dimidine, + 32.8 p.p,m. procaine penicillin Halquinol use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 63.00 None 90 90 None None None None None
13126 13126 10271 None 8560 10.1111/j.1365-2885.1981.tb00708.x Cosgrove_1981_JoofVePhanTh A study of fluctuations in Escherichia coli sensitivity patterns from pigs fed a halquinol supplemented diet United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10810 10810 Halquinol use 120 g halquinol/tonne finished feed. Sampled at day 59. Basal feed contained copper at 180 p.p.m. After 42 days, pigs placed on grower feed containing 66 p.p.m. of both chlortetracycline hydrochloride + sulpha- dimidine, + 32.8 p.p,m. procaine penicillin Halquinol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 90 90 None None None None None
13128 13128 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Aminoglycosides paromomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 1 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
13129 13129 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 0 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
13130 13130 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 0 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
13131 13131 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Aminoglycosides tobramycin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 2 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
13132 13132 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Aminoglycosides netilmicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
13133 13133 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
13134 13134 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
13135 13135 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 2 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
13136 13136 10278 None 8772 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02088.x Delsol_2003_JoofApMi The effect of chlortetracycline treatment and its subsequent withdrawal on multi-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 and commensal Escherichia coli in the pig United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10815 10815 Chlortetracycline use Therapeutic dose 15 mg/kg in feed for 7 days. Sample 1-2 weeks after treatment Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column tet(A) Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 2 None None None None None 19 27 None None None None None
13137 13137 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 2 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
13138 13138 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 12 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
13139 13139 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
13140 13140 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
13141 13141 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
13142 13142 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
13143 13143 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 2 None 0 None None None None None 10 7 None None None None None
13144 13144 10278 None 8772 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02088.x Delsol_2003_JoofApMi The effect of chlortetracycline treatment and its subsequent withdrawal on multi-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 and commensal Escherichia coli in the pig United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10815 10815 Chlortetracycline use Therapeutic dose 15 mg/kg in feed for 7 days. Sample 1-2 weeks after treatment Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column tet(B) Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 6 None None None None None 19 27 None None None None None
13145 13145 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 10 7 None None None None None
13146 13146 10278 None 8772 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02088.x Delsol_2003_JoofApMi The effect of chlortetracycline treatment and its subsequent withdrawal on multi-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 and commensal Escherichia coli in the pig United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10816 10816 Chlortetracycline use Therapeutic dose 15 mg/kg in feed for 7 days. Sample 3-4 weeks after treatment Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column tet(A) Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 6 None None None None None 30 23 None None None None None
13147 13147 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 2 None 0 None None None None None 10 7 None None None None None
13148 13148 10278 None 8772 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02088.x Delsol_2003_JoofApMi The effect of chlortetracycline treatment and its subsequent withdrawal on multi-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 and commensal Escherichia coli in the pig United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10816 10816 Chlortetracycline use Therapeutic dose 15 mg/kg in feed for 7 days. Sample 3-4 weeks after treatment Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column tet(B) Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 0 None None None None None 19 27 None None None None None
13149 13149 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 10 7 None None None None None
13150 13150 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecium False None False 10 None 5 None None None None None 10 7 None None None None None
13151 13151 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus faecium False None False 4 None 3 None None None None None 10 7 None None None None None
13152 13152 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Enterococcus faecium False None False 2 None 2 None None None None None 10 7 None None None None None
13153 13153 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 10 7 None None None None None
13154 13154 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Glycopeptide antibacterials teicoplanin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 10 7 None None None None None
13155 13155 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 6 None 4 None None None None None 10 7 None None None None None
13156 13156 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Lincosamides lincomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 5 None 4 None None None None None 10 7 None None None None None
13157 13157 10018 None 10642 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.030 Kempf2013 Effect of in-feed paromomycin supplementation on antimicrobial resistance of enteric bacteria in turkeys France Experimental 10056 10056 Paromomycin use in feed Breeder turkeys were administered feed supplemented with 100 mg/kg (100 ppm) paromomycin sulfate from day 0 (hatching) to day 120. Results from day 180. Paromomycin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Streptogramins pristinamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 10 7 None None None None None
13158 13158 10278 None 8772 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02088.x Delsol_2003_JoofApMi The effect of chlortetracycline treatment and its subsequent withdrawal on multi-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 and commensal Escherichia coli in the pig United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10813 10813 Chlortetracycline use Subtherapeutic dose 1.5 mg/kg in feed for 7 days. Sample 1-2 weeks after treatment Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column tet(A) Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 2 None None None None None 24 27 None None None None None
13159 13159 10278 None 8772 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02088.x Delsol_2003_JoofApMi The effect of chlortetracycline treatment and its subsequent withdrawal on multi-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 and commensal Escherichia coli in the pig United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10813 10813 Chlortetracycline use Subtherapeutic dose 1.5 mg/kg in feed for 7 days. Sample 1-2 weeks after treatment Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column tet(B) Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 6 None None None None None 19 27 None None None None None
13160 13160 10278 None 8772 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02088.x Delsol_2003_JoofApMi The effect of chlortetracycline treatment and its subsequent withdrawal on multi-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 and commensal Escherichia coli in the pig United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10814 10814 Chlortetracycline use Subtherapeutic dose 1.5 mg/kg in feed for 7 days. Sample 3-4 weeks after treatment Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column tet(A) Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 6 None None None None None 32 23 None None None None None
13161 13161 10278 None 8772 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02088.x Delsol_2003_JoofApMi The effect of chlortetracycline treatment and its subsequent withdrawal on multi-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT104 and commensal Escherichia coli in the pig United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10814 10814 Chlortetracycline use Subtherapeutic dose 1.5 mg/kg in feed for 7 days. Sample 3-4 weeks after treatment Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column tet(B) Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 0 None None None None None 32 27 None None None None None
13162 13162 10288 None 9404 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01110.x Garca.Feliz_2008_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica isolates from apparently healthy and clinically ill finishing pigs in Spain Spain Observational 10837 10837 Swine Health Apparently healthy vs clinically ill (diarrhea) Clinically Ill (Diarrhea) Apparently Healthy Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 103 None 203 None None None None None 182 263 None None None None None
13163 13163 10288 None 9404 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01110.x Garca.Feliz_2008_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica isolates from apparently healthy and clinically ill finishing pigs in Spain Spain Observational 10837 10837 Swine Health Apparently healthy vs clinically ill (diarrhea) Clinically Ill (Diarrhea) Apparently Healthy Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 55 None 95 None None None None None 182 263 None None None None None
13165 13165 10288 None 9404 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01110.x Garca.Feliz_2008_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica isolates from apparently healthy and clinically ill finishing pigs in Spain Spain Observational 10837 10837 Swine Health Apparently healthy vs clinically ill (diarrhea) Clinically Ill (Diarrhea) Apparently Healthy Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 51 None 102 None None None None None 182 263 None None None None None
13166 13166 10288 None 9404 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01110.x Garca.Feliz_2008_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica isolates from apparently healthy and clinically ill finishing pigs in Spain Spain Observational 10837 10837 Swine Health Apparently healthy vs clinically ill (diarrhea) Clinically Ill (Diarrhea) Apparently Healthy Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 122 None 70 None None None None None 182 263 None None None None None
13167 13167 10288 None 9404 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01110.x Garca.Feliz_2008_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica isolates from apparently healthy and clinically ill finishing pigs in Spain Spain Observational 10837 10837 Swine Health Apparently healthy vs clinically ill (diarrhea) Clinically Ill (Diarrhea) Apparently Healthy Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 24 None 46 None None None None None 182 263 None None None None None
13168 13168 10288 None 9404 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01110.x Garca.Feliz_2008_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica isolates from apparently healthy and clinically ill finishing pigs in Spain Spain Observational 10837 10837 Swine Health Apparently healthy vs clinically ill (diarrhea) Clinically Ill (Diarrhea) Apparently Healthy Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 53 None 95 None None None None None 182 263 None None None None None
13169 13169 10288 None 9404 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01110.x Garca.Feliz_2008_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica isolates from apparently healthy and clinically ill finishing pigs in Spain Spain Observational 10837 10837 Swine Health Apparently healthy vs clinically ill (diarrhea) Clinically Ill (Diarrhea) Apparently Healthy Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 28 None 64 None None None None None 182 263 None None None None None
13170 13170 10288 None 9404 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01110.x Garca.Feliz_2008_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica isolates from apparently healthy and clinically ill finishing pigs in Spain Spain Observational 10837 10837 Swine Health Apparently healthy vs clinically ill (diarrhea) Clinically Ill (Diarrhea) Apparently Healthy Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 0 None 9 None None None None None 182 263 None None None None None
13171 13171 10288 None 9404 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01110.x Garca.Feliz_2008_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica isolates from apparently healthy and clinically ill finishing pigs in Spain Spain Observational 10837 10837 Swine Health Apparently healthy vs clinically ill (diarrhea) Clinically Ill (Diarrhea) Apparently Healthy Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols florfenicol None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 18 None 29 None None None None None 182 263 None None None None None
13172 13172 10288 None 9404 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01110.x Garca.Feliz_2008_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica isolates from apparently healthy and clinically ill finishing pigs in Spain Spain Observational 10837 10837 Swine Health Apparently healthy vs clinically ill (diarrhea) Clinically Ill (Diarrhea) Apparently Healthy Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 0 None 5 None None None None None 182 263 None None None None None
13173 13173 10288 None 9404 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01110.x Garca.Feliz_2008_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica isolates from apparently healthy and clinically ill finishing pigs in Spain Spain Observational 10837 10837 Swine Health Apparently healthy vs clinically ill (diarrhea) Clinically Ill (Diarrhea) Apparently Healthy Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides apramycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 2 None 6 None None None None None 182 263 None None None None None
13174 13174 10015 None 10585 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.022 Kaspersen2018 Occurrence of quinolone resistant E. coli originating from different animal species in Norway Norway Observational 10050 10050 Medium Population Density Effect of medium human population density (five–200 inhabitants per km2) compared to low human population density (< five inhabitants per km2) Medium Population Density Low Population Density Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials quinolones, combinations with other antibacterials None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 142 20 None None None None None
13175 13175 10015 None 10585 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.022 Kaspersen2018 Occurrence of quinolone resistant E. coli originating from different animal species in Norway Norway Observational 10045 10045 High Population Density Effect of high human population density (> 200 inhabitants per km2) compared to low human population density (< five inhabitants per km2) High Population Density Low Population Density Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials quinolones, combinations with other antibacterials None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.50 None 0.00 None 22 20 None None None None None
13176 13176 10296 None 10264 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.07.014 Jahanbakhsh_2015_ReinVeSc Impact of medicated feed along with clay mineral supplementation on Escherichia coli resistance to antimicrobial agents in pigs after weaning in field conditions Canada Experimental 10895 10895 Clinoptilolite use 2% clinoptilolite in feed for 28 days. Other antimicrobials included in basal feed for both control and supplemented groups Clinoptilolite use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 5 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
13177 13177 10296 None 10264 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.07.014 Jahanbakhsh_2015_ReinVeSc Impact of medicated feed along with clay mineral supplementation on Escherichia coli resistance to antimicrobial agents in pigs after weaning in field conditions Canada Experimental 10895 10895 Clinoptilolite use 2% clinoptilolite in feed for 28 days. Other antimicrobials included in basal feed for both control and supplemented groups Clinoptilolite use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 5 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
13178 13178 10296 None 10264 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.07.014 Jahanbakhsh_2015_ReinVeSc Impact of medicated feed along with clay mineral supplementation on Escherichia coli resistance to antimicrobial agents in pigs after weaning in field conditions Canada Experimental 10892 10892 Clinoptilolite use 2% clinoptilolite in feed for 28 days Other antimicrobials included in basal feed for both control and supplemented groups Clinoptilolite use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 5 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
13179 13179 10296 None 10264 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.07.014 Jahanbakhsh_2015_ReinVeSc Impact of medicated feed along with clay mineral supplementation on Escherichia coli resistance to antimicrobial agents in pigs after weaning in field conditions Canada Experimental 10896 10896 Clinoptilolite use 2% clinoptilolite in feed for 28 days. Prevalence of blaCMY2. Other antimicrobials included in basal feed for both control and supplemented groups Clinoptilolite use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column CMY-2 Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 5 None None None None None 10 10 None None None None None
13180 13180 10296 None 10264 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.07.014 Jahanbakhsh_2015_ReinVeSc Impact of medicated feed along with clay mineral supplementation on Escherichia coli resistance to antimicrobial agents in pigs after weaning in field conditions Canada Experimental 10901 10901 Clinoptilolite use 2% clinoptilolite in feed for 28 days. Prevalence of iucD. Other antimicrobials included in basal feed for both control and supplemented groups Clinoptilolite use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 3 None None None None None 10 10 None None None None None
13181 13181 10296 None 10264 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.07.014 Jahanbakhsh_2015_ReinVeSc Impact of medicated feed along with clay mineral supplementation on Escherichia coli resistance to antimicrobial agents in pigs after weaning in field conditions Canada Experimental 10894 10894 Clinoptilolite use 2% clinoptilolite in feed for 28 days Prevalence of gene tsh. Other antimicrobials included in basal feed for both control and supplemented groups Clinoptilolite use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 3 None None None None None 10 10 None None None None None
13182 13182 10296 None 10264 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.07.014 Jahanbakhsh_2015_ReinVeSc Impact of medicated feed along with clay mineral supplementation on Escherichia coli resistance to antimicrobial agents in pigs after weaning in field conditions Canada Experimental 10893 10893 Clinoptilolite use 2% clinoptilolite in feed for 28 days Prevalence of gene papC. Other antimicrobials included in basal feed for both control and supplemented groups Clinoptilolite use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 10 10 None None None None None
13183 13183 10296 None 10264 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.07.014 Jahanbakhsh_2015_ReinVeSc Impact of medicated feed along with clay mineral supplementation on Escherichia coli resistance to antimicrobial agents in pigs after weaning in field conditions Canada Experimental 10898 10898 Clinoptilolite use 2% clinoptilolite in feed for 28 days. Prevalence of gene cnf. Other antimicrobials included in basal feed for both control and supplemented groups Clinoptilolite use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 10 10 None None None None None
13184 13184 10218 None 7174 10.1007/s00580-017-2402-x Abdi.Hachesoo_2017_CompClinPath Farm-level evaluation of enrofloxacin resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from broiler chickens during a rearing period Iran (Islamic Republic of) Observational 10636 10636 Antimicorbial use Use of antibiotics in the previous stocking period Antibiotic use no use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 88.90 11.10 78.20 21.80 90 110 None None None None None
13185 13185 10218 None 7174 10.1007/s00580-017-2402-x Abdi.Hachesoo_2017_CompClinPath Farm-level evaluation of enrofloxacin resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from broiler chickens during a rearing period Iran (Islamic Republic of) Observational 10635 10635 Antimicorbial use Use of antibiotics in the current stocking period Antibiotic use no use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 91.50 8.50 67.10 32.90 130 70 None None None None None
13186 13186 10218 None 7174 10.1007/s00580-017-2402-x Abdi.Hachesoo_2017_CompClinPath Farm-level evaluation of enrofloxacin resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from broiler chickens during a rearing period Iran (Islamic Republic of) Observational 10638 10638 Colibacillosis in the current rearing period Colibacillosis in the current rearing period Yes no Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 90.00 10.00 74.40 25.60 110 90 None None None None None
13187 13187 10218 None 7174 10.1007/s00580-017-2402-x Abdi.Hachesoo_2017_CompClinPath Farm-level evaluation of enrofloxacin resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from broiler chickens during a rearing period Iran (Islamic Republic of) Observational 10641 10641 Viral respiratory complex infections in the current rearing period Viral respiratory complex infections in the current rearing period Yes no Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 86.90 13.10 75.70 24.30 130 70 None None None None None
13188 13188 10218 None 7174 10.1007/s00580-017-2402-x Abdi.Hachesoo_2017_CompClinPath Farm-level evaluation of enrofloxacin resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from broiler chickens during a rearing period Iran (Islamic Republic of) Observational 10637 10637 Antmicorbial use Use of antibiotic as a grow promoter in feed Antibiotic use no use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 90.00 10.00 82.20 17.80 20 180 None None None None None
13189 13189 10218 None 7174 10.1007/s00580-017-2402-x Abdi.Hachesoo_2017_CompClinPath Farm-level evaluation of enrofloxacin resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from broiler chickens during a rearing period Iran (Islamic Republic of) Observational 10640 10640 Use of probiotic in feed Use of probiotic in feed Yes no Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 65.00 35.00 85.00 15.00 20 180 None None None None None
13190 13190 10218 None 7174 10.1007/s00580-017-2402-x Abdi.Hachesoo_2017_CompClinPath Farm-level evaluation of enrofloxacin resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from broiler chickens during a rearing period Iran (Islamic Republic of) Observational 10639 10639 Physical character of feed (pellet or mesh) Physical character of feed (pellet or mesh) Pellet Mash Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 80.00 20.00 86.00 14.00 90 110 None None None None None
13191 13191 10218 None 7174 10.1007/s00580-017-2402-x Abdi.Hachesoo_2017_CompClinPath Farm-level evaluation of enrofloxacin resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from broiler chickens during a rearing period Iran (Islamic Republic of) Observational 10643 10643 Water supply (well or piping system) Water supply (well or piping system) Well piping system Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 80.00 20.00 86.70 13.30 110 60 None None None None None
13192 13192 10218 None 7174 10.1007/s00580-017-2402-x Abdi.Hachesoo_2017_CompClinPath Farm-level evaluation of enrofloxacin resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from broiler chickens during a rearing period Iran (Islamic Republic of) Observational 10642 10642 Water supply (piping system, or river) Water supply (piping system, or river) River piping system Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 86.70 13.30 86.70 13.30 30 60 None None None None None
13193 13193 10019 None 10645 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00955 Kempf2017 Campylobacter coli in organic and conventional pig production in France and Sweden: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance France Observational 10057 10057 Organic farming (France) Colon contents from conventional and organic farmed pigs were sampled at slaughterhouse Organic farming Conventional farming Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False 108 None 114 None None None None None 140 123 None None None None None
13194 13194 10019 None 10645 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00955 Kempf2017 Campylobacter coli in organic and conventional pig production in France and Sweden: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance France Observational 10057 10057 Organic farming (France) Colon contents from conventional and organic farmed pigs were sampled at slaughterhouse Organic farming Conventional farming Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 25 None 62 None None None None None 140 123 None None None None None
13195 13195 10019 None 10645 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00955 Kempf2017 Campylobacter coli in organic and conventional pig production in France and Sweden: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance France Observational 10057 10057 Organic farming (France) Colon contents from conventional and organic farmed pigs were sampled at slaughterhouse Organic farming Conventional farming Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter coli False None False 41 None 53 None None None None None 140 123 None None None None None
13196 13196 10019 None 10645 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00955 Kempf2017 Campylobacter coli in organic and conventional pig production in France and Sweden: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance France Observational 10057 10057 Organic farming (France) Colon contents from conventional and organic farmed pigs were sampled at slaughterhouse Organic farming Conventional farming Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 39 None 53 None None None None None 140 123 None None None None None
13197 13197 10019 None 10645 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00955 Kempf2017 Campylobacter coli in organic and conventional pig production in France and Sweden: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance France Observational 10057 10057 Organic farming (France) Colon contents from conventional and organic farmed pigs were sampled at slaughterhouse Organic farming Conventional farming Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 104 None 88 None None None None None 140 123 None None None None None
13198 13198 10019 None 10645 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00955 Kempf2017 Campylobacter coli in organic and conventional pig production in France and Sweden: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance France Observational 10057 10057 Organic farming (France) Colon contents from conventional and organic farmed pigs were sampled at slaughterhouse Organic farming Conventional farming Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 140 123 None None None None None
13199 13199 10019 None 10645 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00955 Kempf2017 Campylobacter coli in organic and conventional pig production in France and Sweden: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance France Observational 10058 10058 Organic Farming (Sweden, Colon contents) Colon contents from conventional and organic farmed pigs were sampled at slaughterhouse Organic Farming Conventional farming Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 20 24 None None None None None
13200 13200 10019 None 10645 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00955 Kempf2017 Campylobacter coli in organic and conventional pig production in France and Sweden: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance France Observational 10058 10058 Organic Farming (Sweden, Colon contents) Colon contents from conventional and organic farmed pigs were sampled at slaughterhouse Organic Farming Conventional farming Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 24 None None None None None
13201 13201 10019 None 10645 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00955 Kempf2017 Campylobacter coli in organic and conventional pig production in France and Sweden: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance France Observational 10058 10058 Organic Farming (Sweden, Colon contents) Colon contents from conventional and organic farmed pigs were sampled at slaughterhouse Organic Farming Conventional farming Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter coli False None False 4 None 7 None None None None None 20 24 None None None None None
13202 13202 10019 None 10645 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00955 Kempf2017 Campylobacter coli in organic and conventional pig production in France and Sweden: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance France Observational 10058 10058 Organic Farming (Sweden, Colon contents) Colon contents from conventional and organic farmed pigs were sampled at slaughterhouse Organic Farming Conventional farming Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 4 None 7 None None None None None 20 24 None None None None None
13203 13203 10019 None 10645 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00955 Kempf2017 Campylobacter coli in organic and conventional pig production in France and Sweden: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance France Observational 10058 10058 Organic Farming (Sweden, Colon contents) Colon contents from conventional and organic farmed pigs were sampled at slaughterhouse Organic Farming Conventional farming Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 10 None 12 None None None None None 20 24 None None None None None
13204 13204 10019 None 10645 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00955 Kempf2017 Campylobacter coli in organic and conventional pig production in France and Sweden: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance France Observational 10058 10058 Organic Farming (Sweden, Colon contents) Colon contents from conventional and organic farmed pigs were sampled at slaughterhouse Organic Farming Conventional farming Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 24 None None None None None
13205 13205 10019 None 10645 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00955 Kempf2017 Campylobacter coli in organic and conventional pig production in France and Sweden: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance France Observational 10059 10059 Organic Farming (Sweden, Feces) Feces from conventional and organic farmed pigs were sampled on-farm, 1 week before slaughter Organic Farming Conventional farming Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 22 16 None None None None None
13206 13206 10019 None 10645 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00955 Kempf2017 Campylobacter coli in organic and conventional pig production in France and Sweden: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance France Observational 10059 10059 Organic Farming (Sweden, Feces) Feces from conventional and organic farmed pigs were sampled on-farm, 1 week before slaughter Organic Farming Conventional farming Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 22 16 None None None None None
13207 13207 10019 None 10645 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00955 Kempf2017 Campylobacter coli in organic and conventional pig production in France and Sweden: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance France Observational 10059 10059 Organic Farming (Sweden, Feces) Feces from conventional and organic farmed pigs were sampled on-farm, 1 week before slaughter Organic Farming Conventional farming Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter coli False None False 9 None 8 None None None None None 22 16 None None None None None
13208 13208 10019 None 10645 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00955 Kempf2017 Campylobacter coli in organic and conventional pig production in France and Sweden: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance France Observational 10059 10059 Organic Farming (Sweden, Feces) Feces from conventional and organic farmed pigs were sampled on-farm, 1 week before slaughter Organic Farming Conventional farming Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 9 None 8 None None None None None 22 16 None None None None None
13209 13209 10019 None 10645 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00955 Kempf2017 Campylobacter coli in organic and conventional pig production in France and Sweden: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance France Observational 10059 10059 Organic Farming (Sweden, Feces) Feces from conventional and organic farmed pigs were sampled on-farm, 1 week before slaughter Organic Farming Conventional farming Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 17 None 7 None None None None None 22 16 None None None None None
13210 13210 10019 None 10645 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00955 Kempf2017 Campylobacter coli in organic and conventional pig production in France and Sweden: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance France Observational 10059 10059 Organic Farming (Sweden, Feces) Feces from conventional and organic farmed pigs were sampled on-farm, 1 week before slaughter Organic Farming Conventional farming Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 22 16 None None None None None
13211 13211 10025 None 10748 10.3382/ps/pex275 Kim2018 Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10067 10067 Organic farming Organic and conventional chicken carcass samples were collected from local retail markets Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Combination False None False 41 11 35 17 None None None None 52 52 None None None None None
13212 13212 10025 None 10748 10.3382/ps/pex275 Kim2018 Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10067 10067 Organic farming Organic and conventional chicken carcass samples were collected from local retail markets Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Combination False None False 31 21 31 21 None None None None 52 52 None None None None None
13213 13213 10025 None 10748 10.3382/ps/pex275 Kim2018 Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10067 10067 Organic farming Organic and conventional chicken carcass samples were collected from local retail markets Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Antibiotics rifampicin None Enterococcus Combination False None False 38 14 34 18 None None None None 52 52 None None None None None
13214 13214 10025 None 10748 10.3382/ps/pex275 Kim2018 Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10067 10067 Organic farming Organic and conventional chicken carcass samples were collected from local retail markets Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus Combination False None False 1 51 3 49 None None None None 52 52 None None None None None
13215 13215 10025 None 10748 10.3382/ps/pex275 Kim2018 Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10067 10067 Organic farming Organic and conventional chicken carcass samples were collected from local retail markets Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus Combination False None False 0 52 1 51 None None None None 52 52 None None None None None
13216 13216 10025 None 10748 10.3382/ps/pex275 Kim2018 Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10067 10067 Organic farming Organic and conventional chicken carcass samples were collected from local retail markets Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials teicoplanin None Enterococcus Combination False None False 0 52 0 52 None None None None 52 52 None None None None None
13217 13217 10025 None 10748 10.3382/ps/pex275 Kim2018 Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10067 10067 Organic farming Organic and conventional chicken carcass samples were collected from local retail markets Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus Combination False None False 8 44 10 42 None None None None 52 52 None None None None None
13218 13218 10025 None 10748 10.3382/ps/pex275 Kim2018 Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10067 10067 Organic farming Organic and conventional chicken carcass samples were collected from local retail markets Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus Combination False None False 35 17 31 21 None None None None 52 52 None None None None None
13219 13219 10025 None 10748 10.3382/ps/pex275 Kim2018 Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10067 10067 Organic farming Organic and conventional chicken carcass samples were collected from local retail markets Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tigecycline None Enterococcus Combination False None False 0 52 0 52 None None None None 52 52 None None None None None
13220 13220 10025 None 10748 10.3382/ps/pex275 Kim2018 Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea Republic of Korea Observational 10067 10067 Organic farming Organic and conventional chicken carcass samples were collected from local retail markets Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials linezolid None Enterococcus Combination False None False 6 46 15 37 None None None None 52 52 None None None None None
13222 13222 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11078 11078 Growth Promoter Ban (France) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in France as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics avilamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 44.00 None 58.00 None 312 268 None None None None None
13223 13223 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10943 10943 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Denmark Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.90 None 25.00 None 52 52 None None None None None
13224 13224 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10943 10943 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Denmark Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 52 52 None None None None None
13225 13225 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10943 10943 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Denmark Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.90 None 0.00 None 52 52 None None None None None
13226 13226 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10943 10943 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Denmark Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 52 52 None None None None None
13227 13227 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10943 10943 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Denmark Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 5.80 None 52 52 None None None None None
13228 13228 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10943 10943 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Denmark Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 52 52 None None None None None
13229 13229 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10943 10943 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Denmark Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 13.50 None 44.20 None 52 52 None None None None None
13230 13230 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10943 10943 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Denmark Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 9.60 None 24.60 None 52 52 None None None None None
13231 13231 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10943 10943 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Denmark Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 13.50 None 42.30 None 52 52 None None None None None
13232 13232 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10943 10943 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Denmark Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 7.70 None 23.10 None 52 52 None None None None None
13233 13233 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10944 10944 Production type Conventional vs Organic in France Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 13.00 None 14.90 None 100 94 None None None None None
13234 13234 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10944 10944 Production type Conventional vs Organic in France Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 100 94 None None None None None
13235 13235 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10944 10944 Production type Conventional vs Organic in France Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.00 None 17.00 None 100 94 None None None None None
13236 13236 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10944 10944 Production type Conventional vs Organic in France Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.00 None 4.30 None 100 94 None None None None None
13237 13237 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10944 10944 Production type Conventional vs Organic in France Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 6.00 None 7.50 None 100 94 None None None None None
13238 13238 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10944 10944 Production type Conventional vs Organic in France Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.30 None 2.00 None 100 94 None None None None None
13239 13239 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10944 10944 Production type Conventional vs Organic in France Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 32.00 None 66.00 None 100 94 None None None None None
13240 13240 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10944 10944 Production type Conventional vs Organic in France Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 46.00 None 74.50 None 100 94 None None None None None
13241 13241 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10944 10944 Production type Conventional vs Organic in France Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 40.40 None 100 94 None None None None None
13242 13242 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10945 10945 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Italy Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 9.60 None 2.40 None 100 94 None None None None None
13243 13243 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10945 10945 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Italy Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.40 None 30.40 None 100 94 None None None None None
13244 13244 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10945 10945 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Italy Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.80 None 12.00 None 100 94 None None None None None
13245 13245 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10945 10945 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Italy Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.80 None 6.40 None 100 94 None None None None None
13246 13246 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10945 10945 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Italy Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.80 None 10.40 None 100 94 None None None None None
13247 13247 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10945 10945 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Italy Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 9.60 None 61.60 None 100 94 None None None None None
13248 13248 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10945 10945 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Italy Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 15.20 None 61.60 None 100 94 None None None None None
13249 13249 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10945 10945 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Italy Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 34.40 None 74.40 None 100 94 None None None None None
13250 13250 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10945 10945 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Italy Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 9.60 None 50.40 None 100 94 None None None None None
13251 13251 10315 None 11965 Nair_2018_CanaVeteJour A clinical trial investigating the impact of in-feed flavophospholipol on Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance in pigs Canada Experimental 10936 10936 Flavophospholipol use 4 ppm in feed (grow-finish pigs) for 3 weeks. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 11 None 9 None None None None None 15 15 None None None None None
13252 13252 10315 None 11965 Nair_2018_CanaVeteJour A clinical trial investigating the impact of in-feed flavophospholipol on Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance in pigs Canada Experimental 10936 10936 Flavophospholipol use 4 ppm in feed (grow-finish pigs) for 3 weeks. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 15 None 15 None None None None None 15 15 None None None None None
13253 13253 10315 None 11965 Nair_2018_CanaVeteJour A clinical trial investigating the impact of in-feed flavophospholipol on Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance in pigs Canada Experimental 10936 10936 Flavophospholipol use 4 ppm in feed (grow-finish pigs) for 3 weeks. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 14 None 9 None None None None None 15 15 None None None None None
13254 13254 10315 None 11965 Nair_2018_CanaVeteJour A clinical trial investigating the impact of in-feed flavophospholipol on Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance in pigs Canada Experimental 10936 10936 Flavophospholipol use 4 ppm in feed (grow-finish pigs) for 3 weeks. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 14 None 9 None None None None None 15 15 None None None None None
13255 13255 10296 None 10264 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.07.014 Jahanbakhsh_2015_ReinVeSc Impact of medicated feed along with clay mineral supplementation on Escherichia coli resistance to antimicrobial agents in pigs after weaning in field conditions Canada Experimental 10897 10897 Clinoptilolite use 2% clinoptilolite in feed for 28 days. Prevalence of gene blaCMY2. Other antimicrobials included in basal feed for both control and supplemented groups Clinoptilolite use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column CMY-2 Escherichia coli False None False 42 None 60 None None None None None 1001 627 None None None None None
13256 13256 10156 None 8809 10.1128/aac.05617-11 Dheilly2012 Resistance gene transfer during treatments for experimental avian colibacillosis France Experimental 10407 10407 Oxytetracycline treatment APEC-OTC - Oxytetracycline in water (20 mg/kg), days 21–23. Compared to APEC-NT (Challenged, no treatment). Oxytetracycline treatment Challenged, Non-treated (APEC-NT) Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 20 0 12 8 None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13257 13257 10156 None 8809 10.1128/aac.05617-11 Dheilly2012 Resistance gene transfer during treatments for experimental avian colibacillosis France Experimental 10409 10409 Sulfadimethoxine-trimethoprim treatment APEC-SXT - Sulfadimethoxine-trimethoprim in water (28 and 6mg/kg), days 21–25. Compared to APEC-NT (Challenged, no treatment). Sulfadimethoxine-trimethoprim treatment Challenged, Non-treated (APEC-NT) Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 16 4 12 8 None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13259 13259 10296 None 10264 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.07.014 Jahanbakhsh_2015_ReinVeSc Impact of medicated feed along with clay mineral supplementation on Escherichia coli resistance to antimicrobial agents in pigs after weaning in field conditions Canada Experimental 10899 10899 Clinoptilolite use 2% clinoptilolite in feed for 28 days. Prevalence of gene iucD. Other antimicrobials included in basal feed for both control and supplemented groups Clinoptilolite use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False 24 None 51 None None None None None 1001 627 None None None None None
13260 13260 10296 None 10264 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.07.014 Jahanbakhsh_2015_ReinVeSc Impact of medicated feed along with clay mineral supplementation on Escherichia coli resistance to antimicrobial agents in pigs after weaning in field conditions Canada Experimental 10900 10900 Clinoptilolite use 2% clinoptilolite in feed for 28 days. Prevalence of gene tsh. Other antimicrobials included in basal feed for both control and supplemented groups Clinoptilolite use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 26 None None None None None 1001 627 None None None None None
13261 13261 10156 None 8809 10.1128/aac.05617-11 Dheilly2012 Resistance gene transfer during treatments for experimental avian colibacillosis France Experimental 10405 10405 Enrofloxacin treatment APEC-ENR - Enrofloxacin (10 mg/kg), days 21–25. Compared to APEC-NT (Challenged, no treatment). Enrofloxacin treatment Challenged, Non-treated (APEC-NT) Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 6 14 12 8 None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13262 13262 10156 None 8809 10.1128/aac.05617-11 Dheilly2012 Resistance gene transfer during treatments for experimental avian colibacillosis France Experimental 10410 10410 Sulfadimethoxine-trimethoprim treatment APEC-SXT - Sulfadimethoxine-trimethoprim in water (28 and 6mg/kg), days 21–25. Compared to NINT (unchallenged, no treatment). Sulfadimethoxine-trimethoprim treatment Unchallenged, Non-treated (NINT) Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13263 13263 10156 None 8809 10.1128/aac.05617-11 Dheilly2012 Resistance gene transfer during treatments for experimental avian colibacillosis France Experimental 10409 10409 Sulfadimethoxine-trimethoprim treatment APEC-SXT - Sulfadimethoxine-trimethoprim in water (28 and 6mg/kg), days 21–25. Compared to APEC-NT (Challenged, no treatment). Sulfadimethoxine-trimethoprim treatment Challenged, Non-treated (APEC-NT) Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13264 13264 10156 None 8809 10.1128/aac.05617-11 Dheilly2012 Resistance gene transfer during treatments for experimental avian colibacillosis France Experimental 10406 10406 Enrofloxacin treatment APEC-ENR - Enrofloxacin (10 mg/kg), days 21–25. Compared to NINT (unchallenged, no treatment). Enrofloxacin treatment Unchallenged, Non-treated (NINT) Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13265 13265 10156 None 8809 10.1128/aac.05617-11 Dheilly2012 Resistance gene transfer during treatments for experimental avian colibacillosis France Experimental 10405 10405 Enrofloxacin treatment APEC-ENR - Enrofloxacin (10 mg/kg), days 21–25. Compared to APEC-NT (Challenged, no treatment). Enrofloxacin treatment Challenged, Non-treated (APEC-NT) Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13266 13266 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11078 11078 Growth Promoter Ban (France) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in France as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials bacitracin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 99.00 None 88.00 None 312 268 None None None None None
13267 13267 10330 None 13609 10.1186/s13756-017-0233-9 Strm_2017_AntResandInfCon Antimicrobial use and antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli on small- and medium-scale pig farms in north-eastern Thailand Thailand Observational 10983 10983 Farm size Small (max 20 sows) vs medium (100-500 sows) sized farms Small size Medium size Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 28 None 39 None None None None None 69 81 None None None None None
13268 13268 10330 None 13609 10.1186/s13756-017-0233-9 Strm_2017_AntResandInfCon Antimicrobial use and antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli on small- and medium-scale pig farms in north-eastern Thailand Thailand Observational 10983 10983 Farm size Small (max 20 sows) vs medium (100-500 sows) sized farms Small size Medium size Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 14 None 25 None None None None None 69 81 None None None None None
13269 13269 10330 None 13609 10.1186/s13756-017-0233-9 Strm_2017_AntResandInfCon Antimicrobial use and antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli on small- and medium-scale pig farms in north-eastern Thailand Thailand Observational 10983 10983 Farm size Small (max 20 sows) vs medium (100-500 sows) sized farms Small size Medium size Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 6 None None None None None 69 81 None None None None None
13270 13270 10330 None 13609 10.1186/s13756-017-0233-9 Strm_2017_AntResandInfCon Antimicrobial use and antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli on small- and medium-scale pig farms in north-eastern Thailand Thailand Observational 10983 10983 Farm size Small (max 20 sows) vs medium (100-500 sows) sized farms Small size Medium size Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 26 None 62 None None None None None 69 81 None None None None None
13271 13271 10330 None 13609 10.1186/s13756-017-0233-9 Strm_2017_AntResandInfCon Antimicrobial use and antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli on small- and medium-scale pig farms in north-eastern Thailand Thailand Observational 10983 10983 Farm size Small (max 20 sows) vs medium (100-500 sows) sized farms Small size Medium size Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 52 None 70 None None None None None 69 81 None None None None None
13272 13272 10330 None 13609 10.1186/s13756-017-0233-9 Strm_2017_AntResandInfCon Antimicrobial use and antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli on small- and medium-scale pig farms in north-eastern Thailand Thailand Observational 10983 10983 Farm size Small (max 20 sows) vs medium (100-500 sows) sized farms Small size Medium size Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols florfenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 10 None 2 None None None None None 69 81 None None None None None
13273 13273 10330 None 13609 10.1186/s13756-017-0233-9 Strm_2017_AntResandInfCon Antimicrobial use and antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli on small- and medium-scale pig farms in north-eastern Thailand Thailand Observational 10983 10983 Farm size Small (max 20 sows) vs medium (100-500 sows) sized farms Small size Medium size Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 27 None 47 None None None None None 69 81 None None None None None
13274 13274 10330 None 13609 10.1186/s13756-017-0233-9 Strm_2017_AntResandInfCon Antimicrobial use and antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli on small- and medium-scale pig farms in north-eastern Thailand Thailand Observational 10983 10983 Farm size Small (max 20 sows) vs medium (100-500 sows) sized farms Small size Medium size Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Polymyxins colistin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 69 81 None None None None None
13275 13275 10330 None 13609 10.1186/s13756-017-0233-9 Strm_2017_AntResandInfCon Antimicrobial use and antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli on small- and medium-scale pig farms in north-eastern Thailand Thailand Observational 10983 10983 Farm size Small (max 20 sows) vs medium (100-500 sows) sized farms Small size Medium size Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False 42 None 68 None None None None None 69 81 None None None None None
13276 13276 10330 None 13609 10.1186/s13756-017-0233-9 Strm_2017_AntResandInfCon Antimicrobial use and antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli on small- and medium-scale pig farms in north-eastern Thailand Thailand Observational 10983 10983 Farm size Small (max 20 sows) vs medium (100-500 sows) sized farms Small size Medium size Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 29 None 57 None None None None None 69 81 None None None None None
13277 13277 10330 None 13609 10.1186/s13756-017-0233-9 Strm_2017_AntResandInfCon Antimicrobial use and antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli on small- and medium-scale pig farms in north-eastern Thailand Thailand Observational 10983 10983 Farm size Small (max 20 sows) vs medium (100-500 sows) sized farms Small size Medium size Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 48 None 69 None None None None None 69 81 None None None None None
13278 13278 10330 None 13609 10.1186/s13756-017-0233-9 Strm_2017_AntResandInfCon Antimicrobial use and antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli on small- and medium-scale pig farms in north-eastern Thailand Thailand Observational 10983 10983 Farm size Small (max 20 sows) vs medium (100-500 sows) sized farms Small size Medium size Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 69 81 None None None None None
13279 13279 10330 None 13609 10.1186/s13756-017-0233-9 Strm_2017_AntResandInfCon Antimicrobial use and antimicrobial susceptibility in Escherichia coli on small- and medium-scale pig farms in north-eastern Thailand Thailand Observational 10983 10983 Farm size Small (max 20 sows) vs medium (100-500 sows) sized farms Small size Medium size Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftazidime None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 3 None None None None None 69 81 None None None None None
13281 13281 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11077 11077 Growth Promoter Ban (France) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in France as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Chicken None None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials Avoparcin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 8.00 None 7.00 None 312 268 None None None None None
13282 13282 10231 None 7338 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.05.018 Alali_2009_PrevVeteMedi Relationship between level of antibiotic use and resistance among Escherichia coli isolates from integrated multi-site cohorts of humans and swine United States of America Observational 10668 10668 Ceftiofur use Ceftiofur used as one of several AMs Ceftiofur use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 10 None None None None None 0 196 None None None None None
13283 13283 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11077 11077 Growth Promoter Ban (France) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in France as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Chicken None None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics bambermycin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 95.00 None 89.00 None 312 268 None None None None None
13284 13284 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11077 11077 Growth Promoter Ban (France) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in France as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Chicken None None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides spiramycin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 59.00 None 42.00 None 312 268 None None None None None
13285 13285 10231 None 7338 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.05.018 Alali_2009_PrevVeteMedi Relationship between level of antibiotic use and resistance among Escherichia coli isolates from integrated multi-site cohorts of humans and swine United States of America Observational 10669 10669 Ceftiofur use Ceftiofur used as one of several AMs Ceftiofur use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 21 None None None None None 10 1033 None None None None None
13286 13286 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11077 11077 Growth Promoter Ban (France) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in France as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Chicken None None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 59.00 None 42.00 None 312 268 None None None None None
13287 13287 10231 None 7338 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.05.018 Alali_2009_PrevVeteMedi Relationship between level of antibiotic use and resistance among Escherichia coli isolates from integrated multi-site cohorts of humans and swine United States of America Observational 10678 10678 Oxytetracycline use Oxytetracycline used as one of several antimicrobials Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 100 None 761 None None None None None 114 929 None None None None None
13288 13288 10231 None 7338 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.05.018 Alali_2009_PrevVeteMedi Relationship between level of antibiotic use and resistance among Escherichia coli isolates from integrated multi-site cohorts of humans and swine United States of America Observational 10677 10677 Oxytetracycline use Oxytetracycline used as one of several antimicrobials Oxytetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 169 None None None None None 3 193 None None None None None
13289 13289 10231 None 7338 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.05.018 Alali_2009_PrevVeteMedi Relationship between level of antibiotic use and resistance among Escherichia coli isolates from integrated multi-site cohorts of humans and swine United States of America Observational 10670 10670 Chlortetracycline use Chlortetracycline used as one of several antimicrobials. >0 to < or = 0.04 g/swine kg-month Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines chlortetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 38 None 25 None None None None None 42 31 None None None None None
13290 13290 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11077 11077 Growth Promoter Ban (France) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in France as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Chicken None None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Streptogramins virginiamycin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 32.00 None 12.00 None 312 268 None None None None None
13291 13291 10231 None 7338 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.05.018 Alali_2009_PrevVeteMedi Relationship between level of antibiotic use and resistance among Escherichia coli isolates from integrated multi-site cohorts of humans and swine United States of America Observational 10672 10672 Chlortetracycline use Chlortetracycline used as one of several antimicrobials. >0.04g/swine kg-month Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines chlortetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 109 None 25 None None None None None 123 31 None None None None None
13292 13292 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11079 11079 Growth Promoter Ban (Holland) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in Holland as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Chicken None None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics avilamycin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 21.00 None 64.00 None 318 315 None None None None None
13293 13293 10231 None 7338 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.05.018 Alali_2009_PrevVeteMedi Relationship between level of antibiotic use and resistance among Escherichia coli isolates from integrated multi-site cohorts of humans and swine United States of America Observational 10671 10671 Chlortetracycline use Chlortetracycline used as one of several antimicrobials. >0 to < or = 0.04 g/swine kg-month Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines chlortetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 271 None 387 None None None None None 339 475 None None None None None
13294 13294 10231 None 7338 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.05.018 Alali_2009_PrevVeteMedi Relationship between level of antibiotic use and resistance among Escherichia coli isolates from integrated multi-site cohorts of humans and swine United States of America Observational 10673 10673 Chlortetracycline use Chlortetracycline used as one of several antimicrobials. >0.04g/swine kg-month Chlortetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines chlortetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 203 None 387 None None None None None 229 475 None None None None None
13295 13295 10231 None 7338 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.05.018 Alali_2009_PrevVeteMedi Relationship between level of antibiotic use and resistance among Escherichia coli isolates from integrated multi-site cohorts of humans and swine United States of America Observational 10675 10675 Florfenicol use Florfenicol used as one of several antimicrobials Florfenicol use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols florfenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 7 None None None None None 18 178 None None None None None
13296 13296 10231 None 7338 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.05.018 Alali_2009_PrevVeteMedi Relationship between level of antibiotic use and resistance among Escherichia coli isolates from integrated multi-site cohorts of humans and swine United States of America Observational 10676 10676 Florfenicol use Florfenicol used as one of several antimicrobials Florfenicol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols florfenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 27 None None None None None 0 1043 None None None None None
13297 13297 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11079 11079 Growth Promoter Ban (Holland) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in Holland as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Chicken None None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials Avoparcin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 2.00 None 2.00 None 318 315 None None None None None
13298 13298 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11079 11079 Growth Promoter Ban (Holland) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in Holland as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Chicken None None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials bacitracin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 96.00 None 94.00 None 318 315 None None None None None
13299 13299 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11079 11079 Growth Promoter Ban (Holland) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in Holland as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Chicken None None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics bambermycin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 91.00 None 91.00 None 318 315 None None None None None
13300 13300 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11079 11079 Growth Promoter Ban (Holland) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in Holland as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Chicken None None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides spiramycin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 73.00 None 54.00 None 318 315 None None None None None
13301 13301 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11079 11079 Growth Promoter Ban (Holland) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in Holland as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Chicken None None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 73.00 None 54.00 None 318 315 None None None None None
13302 13302 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11079 11079 Growth Promoter Ban (Holland) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in Holland as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Chicken None None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Streptogramins virginiamycin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 55.00 None 36.00 None 318 315 None None None None None
13303 13303 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11082 11082 Growth Promoter Ban (United Kingdom) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in the UK as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Chicken None None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics avilamycin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 64.00 None 83.00 None 359 353 None None None None None
13304 13304 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11082 11082 Growth Promoter Ban (United Kingdom) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in the UK as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Chicken None None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials Avoparcin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 12.00 None 11.00 None 359 353 None None None None None
13305 13305 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11082 11082 Growth Promoter Ban (United Kingdom) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in the UK as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Chicken None None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials bacitracin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 90.00 None 95.00 None 359 353 None None None None None
13306 13306 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11082 11082 Growth Promoter Ban (United Kingdom) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in the UK as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Chicken None None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics bambermycin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 94.00 None 93.00 None 359 353 None None None None None
13307 13307 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11082 11082 Growth Promoter Ban (United Kingdom) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in the UK as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Chicken None None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides spiramycin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 69.00 None 47.00 None 359 353 None None None None None
13308 13308 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11082 11082 Growth Promoter Ban (United Kingdom) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in the UK as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Chicken None None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 69.00 None 47.00 None 359 353 None None None None None
13309 13309 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11082 11082 Growth Promoter Ban (United Kingdom) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in the UK as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Chicken None None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Streptogramins virginiamycin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 60.00 None 37.00 None 359 353 None None None None None
13310 13310 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11080 11080 Growth Promoter Ban (Holland) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in Holland as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics avilamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.40 None 311 245 None None None None None
13311 13311 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11080 11080 Growth Promoter Ban (Holland) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in Holland as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials Avoparcin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 6.00 None 6.00 None 311 245 None None None None None
13312 13312 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11080 11080 Growth Promoter Ban (Holland) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in Holland as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials bacitracin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 75.00 None 66.00 None 311 245 None None None None None
13313 13313 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11080 11080 Growth Promoter Ban (Holland) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in Holland as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics bambermycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 97.00 None 98.00 None 311 245 None None None None None
13314 13314 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11080 11080 Growth Promoter Ban (Holland) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in Holland as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides spiramycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 83.00 None 56.00 None 311 245 None None None None None
13315 13315 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11080 11080 Growth Promoter Ban (Holland) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in Holland as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 83.00 None 56.00 None 311 245 None None None None None
13316 13316 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11080 11080 Growth Promoter Ban (Holland) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in Holland as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Streptogramins virginiamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 24.00 None 6.00 None 311 245 None None None None None
13317 13317 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11081 11081 Growth Promoter Ban (Spain) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in Spain as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics avilamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 85 168 None None None None None
13318 13318 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11081 11081 Growth Promoter Ban (Spain) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in Spain as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials Avoparcin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 85 168 None None None None None
13319 13319 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11081 11081 Growth Promoter Ban (Spain) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in Spain as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials bacitracin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 96.00 None 85.00 None 85 168 None None None None None
13320 13320 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11081 11081 Growth Promoter Ban (Spain) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in Spain as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics bambermycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 99.00 None 99.00 None 85 168 None None None None None
13321 13321 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11081 11081 Growth Promoter Ban (Spain) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in Spain as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides spiramycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 89.00 None 100.00 None 85 168 None None None None None
13322 13322 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11081 11081 Growth Promoter Ban (Spain) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in Spain as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 89.00 None 100.00 None 85 168 None None None None None
13323 13323 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11081 11081 Growth Promoter Ban (Spain) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin, virginiamycin were available in Spain as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Streptogramins virginiamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 21.00 None 14.00 None 85 168 None None None None None
13326 13326 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11076 11076 Growth Promoter Ban (Denmark) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin were available in Denmark as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics avilamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.60 None 0.40 None 305 249 None None None None None
13327 13327 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11076 11076 Growth Promoter Ban (Denmark) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin were available in Denmark as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials Avoparcin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 6.00 None 7.00 None 305 249 None None None None None
13328 13328 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11076 11076 Growth Promoter Ban (Denmark) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin were available in Denmark as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials bacitracin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 86.00 None 80.00 None 305 249 None None None None None
13329 13329 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11076 11076 Growth Promoter Ban (Denmark) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin were available in Denmark as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics bambermycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 99.00 None 96.00 None 305 249 None None None None None
13330 13330 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11076 11076 Growth Promoter Ban (Denmark) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin were available in Denmark as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides spiramycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 43.00 None 40.00 None 305 249 None None None None None
13331 13331 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11076 11076 Growth Promoter Ban (Denmark) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin were available in Denmark as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 43.00 None 41.00 None 305 249 None None None None None
13332 13332 10371 None 8154 10.1093/jac/dki273 Bywater_2005_JoofAnCh The susceptibility to growth-promoting antibiotics of Enterococcus faecium isolates from pigs and chickens in Europe Denmark Observational 11076 11076 Growth Promoter Ban (Denmark) Avilamycin, bacitracin, flavophospholipol/bambermycin, spiramycin, tylosin were available in Denmark as growth promoters during year 1 (pre-ban), while only avilamycin and flavophospholipol were authorized for such use in year 2 (post-ban). Pre-Ban (Year 1) Post-Ban (Year 2) Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Streptogramins virginiamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 6.00 None 5.00 None 305 249 None None None None None
13333 13333 10163 None 8977 10.3168/jds.2015-9453 Duse2015a Risk factors for quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in feces from preweaned dairy calves and postpartum dairy cows Sweden Observational 10467 10467 Housing at calving Single pen or tiestalls Vs. Group pens or freestall cubicles Group pens or freestall cubicles Single pen or tiestalls Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 7.90 2.20 28.70 0.002 None
13334 13334 10163 None 8977 10.3168/jds.2015-9453 Duse2015a Risk factors for quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in feces from preweaned dairy calves and postpartum dairy cows Sweden Observational 10468 10468 Overall farm hygiene Better than average Vs. Less than average Less than average Better than average Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.60 1.20 10.50 0.021 None
13335 13335 10163 None 8977 10.3168/jds.2015-9453 Duse2015a Risk factors for quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in feces from preweaned dairy calves and postpartum dairy cows Sweden Observational 10469 10469 Purchase of new cattle Purchase of new cattle yes no Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 6.90 2.10 22.90 0.002 None
13336 13336 10163 None 8977 10.3168/jds.2015-9453 Duse2015a Risk factors for quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli in feces from preweaned dairy calves and postpartum dairy cows Sweden Observational 10470 10470 Sharing animal transport with other livestock farmers Sharing animal transport with other livestock farmers yes no Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 6.00 1.90 18.80 0.002 None
13338 13338 10066 None 11826 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.08.006 Mollenkopf2017 Genotypic and epidemiologic characterization of extended-spectrum cephalosporin resistant Salmonella enterica from US beef feedlots United States of America Observational 10185 10185 Tylosin fed in diet Tylosin fed in diet Antimicrobial use no use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pen None See gene column CMY-2 Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 20.07 3.80 106.03 0.0004 None
13339 13339 10066 None 11826 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.08.006 Mollenkopf2017 Genotypic and epidemiologic characterization of extended-spectrum cephalosporin resistant Salmonella enterica from US beef feedlots United States of America Observational 10184 10184 Chlortetracycline fed in diet Chlortetracycline fed in diet antimicrobial use no use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pen None See gene column CMY-2 Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.05 0.01 0.91 0.0045 None
13340 13340 10142 None 8454 10.1016/0378-1135(89)90032-1 Chulasiri1989 Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia Coli Isolated from Chickens Thailand Observational 10395 10395 Production Type (domestic) In general, farm chickens were fed with commercially available compounded animal feeds to which antimicrobial agents, especially tetracyclines, had been added, while domestic chickens were fed with household meals, e.g. rice and vegetables. Healthy domestic chickens Healthy farm chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 20.80 None 180 365 None None None None None
13341 13341 10142 None 8454 10.1016/0378-1135(89)90032-1 Chulasiri1989 Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia Coli Isolated from Chickens Thailand Observational 10395 10395 Production Type (domestic) In general, farm chickens were fed with commercially available compounded animal feeds to which antimicrobial agents, especially tetracyclines, had been added, while domestic chickens were fed with household meals, e.g. rice and vegetables. Healthy domestic chickens Healthy farm chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 7.80 None 32.00 None 180 365 None None None None None
13342 13342 10142 None 8454 10.1016/0378-1135(89)90032-1 Chulasiri1989 Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia Coli Isolated from Chickens Thailand Observational 10395 10395 Production Type (domestic) In general, farm chickens were fed with commercially available compounded animal feeds to which antimicrobial agents, especially tetracyclines, had been added, while domestic chickens were fed with household meals, e.g. rice and vegetables. Healthy domestic chickens Healthy farm chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 7.80 None 30.40 None 180 365 None None None None None
13343 13343 10142 None 8454 10.1016/0378-1135(89)90032-1 Chulasiri1989 Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia Coli Isolated from Chickens Thailand Observational 10395 10395 Production Type (domestic) In general, farm chickens were fed with commercially available compounded animal feeds to which antimicrobial agents, especially tetracyclines, had been added, while domestic chickens were fed with household meals, e.g. rice and vegetables. Healthy domestic chickens Healthy farm chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 17.80 None 90.40 None 180 365 None None None None None
13344 13344 10142 None 8454 10.1016/0378-1135(89)90032-1 Chulasiri1989 Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia Coli Isolated from Chickens Thailand Observational 10395 10395 Production Type (domestic) In general, farm chickens were fed with commercially available compounded animal feeds to which antimicrobial agents, especially tetracyclines, had been added, while domestic chickens were fed with household meals, e.g. rice and vegetables. Healthy domestic chickens Healthy farm chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfathiazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 74.80 None 180 365 None None None None None
13345 13345 10142 None 8454 10.1016/0378-1135(89)90032-1 Chulasiri1989 Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia Coli Isolated from Chickens Thailand Observational 10395 10395 Production Type (domestic) In general, farm chickens were fed with commercially available compounded animal feeds to which antimicrobial agents, especially tetracyclines, had been added, while domestic chickens were fed with household meals, e.g. rice and vegetables. Healthy domestic chickens Healthy farm chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 42.50 None 180 365 None None None None None
13346 13346 10147 None 8569 10.1089/mdr.2008.0859 DaCosta2008 Effects of antimicrobial treatment on selection of resistant Escherichia coli in broiler fecal flora Portugal Experimental 10398 10398 Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use Lincomycin-Spectinomycin fed as Linco-Spectin 100 at 82.8 mg/L on days 1-3. Measured on day 4. Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 46.00 None 42.00 None 26 26 None None None None None
13347 13347 10147 None 8569 10.1089/mdr.2008.0859 DaCosta2008 Effects of antimicrobial treatment on selection of resistant Escherichia coli in broiler fecal flora Portugal Experimental 10398 10398 Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use Lincomycin-Spectinomycin fed as Linco-Spectin 100 at 82.8 mg/L on days 1-3. Measured on day 4. Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Combinations of pencillins and/or beta-lactamase inhibitors amoxicillin and enzyme inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 26 26 None None None None None
13348 13348 10147 None 8569 10.1089/mdr.2008.0859 DaCosta2008 Effects of antimicrobial treatment on selection of resistant Escherichia coli in broiler fecal flora Portugal Experimental 10398 10398 Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use Lincomycin-Spectinomycin fed as Linco-Spectin 100 at 82.8 mg/L on days 1-3. Measured on day 4. Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 35.00 None 27.00 None 26 26 None None None None None
13349 13349 10147 None 8569 10.1089/mdr.2008.0859 DaCosta2008 Effects of antimicrobial treatment on selection of resistant Escherichia coli in broiler fecal flora Portugal Experimental 10398 10398 Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use Lincomycin-Spectinomycin fed as Linco-Spectin 100 at 82.8 mg/L on days 1-3. Measured on day 4. Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 96.00 None 73.00 None 26 26 None None None None None
13350 13350 10147 None 8569 10.1089/mdr.2008.0859 DaCosta2008 Effects of antimicrobial treatment on selection of resistant Escherichia coli in broiler fecal flora Portugal Experimental 10398 10398 Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use Lincomycin-Spectinomycin fed as Linco-Spectin 100 at 82.8 mg/L on days 1-3. Measured on day 4. Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 8.00 None 0.00 None 26 26 None None None None None
13351 13351 10147 None 8569 10.1089/mdr.2008.0859 DaCosta2008 Effects of antimicrobial treatment on selection of resistant Escherichia coli in broiler fecal flora Portugal Experimental 10398 10398 Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use Lincomycin-Spectinomycin fed as Linco-Spectin 100 at 82.8 mg/L on days 1-3. Measured on day 4. Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 26 26 None None None None None
13352 13352 10147 None 8569 10.1089/mdr.2008.0859 DaCosta2008 Effects of antimicrobial treatment on selection of resistant Escherichia coli in broiler fecal flora Portugal Experimental 10398 10398 Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use Lincomycin-Spectinomycin fed as Linco-Spectin 100 at 82.8 mg/L on days 1-3. Measured on day 4. Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 15.00 None 26 26 None None None None None
13353 13353 10147 None 8569 10.1089/mdr.2008.0859 DaCosta2008 Effects of antimicrobial treatment on selection of resistant Escherichia coli in broiler fecal flora Portugal Experimental 10398 10398 Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use Lincomycin-Spectinomycin fed as Linco-Spectin 100 at 82.8 mg/L on days 1-3. Measured on day 4. Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 26 26 None None None None None
13354 13354 10147 None 8569 10.1089/mdr.2008.0859 DaCosta2008 Effects of antimicrobial treatment on selection of resistant Escherichia coli in broiler fecal flora Portugal Experimental 10398 10398 Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use Lincomycin-Spectinomycin fed as Linco-Spectin 100 at 82.8 mg/L on days 1-3. Measured on day 4. Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.00 None 0.00 None 26 26 None None None None None
13355 13355 10147 None 8569 10.1089/mdr.2008.0859 DaCosta2008 Effects of antimicrobial treatment on selection of resistant Escherichia coli in broiler fecal flora Portugal Experimental 10398 10398 Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use Lincomycin-Spectinomycin fed as Linco-Spectin 100 at 82.8 mg/L on days 1-3. Measured on day 4. Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.00 None 0.00 None 26 26 None None None None None
13356 13356 10147 None 8569 10.1089/mdr.2008.0859 DaCosta2008 Effects of antimicrobial treatment on selection of resistant Escherichia coli in broiler fecal flora Portugal Experimental 10398 10398 Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use Lincomycin-Spectinomycin fed as Linco-Spectin 100 at 82.8 mg/L on days 1-3. Measured on day 4. Lincomycin-Spectinomycin Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 35.00 None 15.00 None 26 26 None None None None None
13359 13359 10001 None 10051 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1976.tb00658.x Howe1976 The Effect of Tetracycline on the Coliform Gut Flora of Broiler Chickens with Special Reference to Antibiotic Resistance and O-Serotypes of Escherichia coli United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10001 10001 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline as Terramycin was added to drinking water (6 g/10 galls/1000 chicks/day) for 24 h on day 1. Measured day 28. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 11 None None None None None 11 11 None None None None None
13360 13360 10001 None 10051 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1976.tb00658.x Howe1976 The Effect of Tetracycline on the Coliform Gut Flora of Broiler Chickens with Special Reference to Antibiotic Resistance and O-Serotypes of Escherichia coli United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10001 10001 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline as Terramycin was added to drinking water (6 g/10 galls/1000 chicks/day) for 24 h on day 1. Measured day 28. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 0 None None None None None 11 11 None None None None None
13361 13361 10001 None 10051 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1976.tb00658.x Howe1976 The Effect of Tetracycline on the Coliform Gut Flora of Broiler Chickens with Special Reference to Antibiotic Resistance and O-Serotypes of Escherichia coli United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 10001 10001 Oxytetracycline Use Oxytetracycline as Terramycin was added to drinking water (6 g/10 galls/1000 chicks/day) for 24 h on day 1. Measured day 28. Oxytetracycline Use No Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 11 11 None None None None None
13363 13363 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10070 10070 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 3 years post avoparcin ban (2003) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 299 161 None None None None None
13364 13364 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10070 10070 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 3 years post avoparcin ban (2003) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 77.00 None 64.00 None 299 161 None None None None None
13365 13365 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10070 10070 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 3 years post avoparcin ban (2003) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 51.00 None 28.00 None 299 161 None None None None None
13366 13366 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10070 10070 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 3 years post avoparcin ban (2003) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 93.00 None 85.00 None 299 161 None None None None None
13367 13367 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10071 10071 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. **Gentamicin listed as high level 3 years post avoparcin ban (2003) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 55.00 None 32.00 None 299 161 None None None None None
13368 13368 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10070 10070 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 3 years post avoparcin ban (2003) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials penicillins, combinations with other antibacterials None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 1.00 None 1.00 None 299 161 None None None None None
13369 13369 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10070 10070 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 3 years post avoparcin ban (2003) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 98.00 None 97.00 None 299 161 None None None None None
13370 13370 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10070 10070 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 3 years post avoparcin ban (2003) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 16.00 None 5.00 None 300 119 None None None None None
13371 13371 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10070 10070 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 3 years post avoparcin ban (2003) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 43.00 None 27.00 None 300 119 None None None None None
13372 13372 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10070 10070 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 3 years post avoparcin ban (2003) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 68.00 None 37.00 None 300 119 None None None None None
13373 13373 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10070 10070 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 3 years post avoparcin ban (2003) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 93.00 None 90.00 None 300 119 None None None None None
13374 13374 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10074 10074 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. **Gentamicin listed as high-level** 3 years post avoparcin ban (2003) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 20.00 None 11.00 None 300 119 None None None None None
13375 13375 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10070 10070 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 3 years post avoparcin ban (2003) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials penicillins, combinations with other antibacterials None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 82.00 None 61.00 None 300 119 None None None None None
13376 13376 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10070 10070 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 3 years post avoparcin ban (2003) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 99.00 None 99.00 None 300 119 None None None None None
13377 13377 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10069 10069 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 2 years post avoparcin ban (2002) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 278 161 None None None None None
13378 13378 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10069 10069 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 2 years post avoparcin ban (2002) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 73.00 None 64.00 None 278 161 None None None None None
13379 13379 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10069 10069 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 2 years post avoparcin ban (2002) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 31.00 None 28.00 None 278 161 None None None None None
13380 13380 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10069 10069 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 2 years post avoparcin ban (2002) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 90.00 None 85.00 None 278 161 None None None None None
13381 13381 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10073 10073 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. **Gentamicin listed as high-level** 2 years post avoparcin ban (2002) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 35.00 None 32.00 None 278 161 None None None None None
13382 13382 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10069 10069 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 2 years post avoparcin ban (2002) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials penicillins, combinations with other antibacterials None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 0.00 None 1.00 None 278 161 None None None None None
13383 13383 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10069 10069 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 2 years post avoparcin ban (2002) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 97.00 None 97.00 None 278 161 None None None None None
13384 13384 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10069 10069 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 2 years post avoparcin ban (2002) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 9.00 None 5.00 None 280 119 None None None None None
13385 13385 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10069 10069 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 2 years post avoparcin ban (2002) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 37.00 None 27.00 None 280 119 None None None None None
13386 13386 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10069 10069 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 2 years post avoparcin ban (2002) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 50.00 None 37.00 None 280 119 None None None None None
13387 13387 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10069 10069 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 2 years post avoparcin ban (2002) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 94.00 None 90.00 None 280 119 None None None None None
13388 13388 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10069 10069 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 2 years post avoparcin ban (2002) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 13.00 None 11.00 None 280 119 None None None None None
13389 13389 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10069 10069 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 2 years post avoparcin ban (2002) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials penicillins, combinations with other antibacterials None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 64.00 None 61.00 None 280 119 None None None None None
13390 13390 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10069 10069 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 2 years post avoparcin ban (2002) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 97.00 None 99.00 None 280 119 None None None None None
13391 13391 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10068 10068 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 1 year post avoparcin ban (2001) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 283 161 None None None None None
13392 13392 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10068 10068 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 1 year post avoparcin ban (2001) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 63.00 None 64.00 None 283 161 None None None None None
13393 13393 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10068 10068 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 1 year post avoparcin ban (2001) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 28.00 None 28.00 None 283 161 None None None None None
13394 13394 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10068 10068 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 1 year post avoparcin ban (2001) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 86.00 None 85.00 None 283 161 None None None None None
13395 13395 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10072 10072 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. **Gentamicin listed as high-level** 1 year post avoparcin ban (2001) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 37.00 None 32.00 None 283 161 None None None None None
13396 13396 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10068 10068 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 1 year post avoparcin ban (2001) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials penicillins, combinations with other antibacterials None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 1.00 None 1.00 None 283 161 None None None None None
13397 13397 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10068 10068 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 1 year post avoparcin ban (2001) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 95.00 None 97.00 None 283 161 None None None None None
13398 13398 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10068 10068 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 1 year post avoparcin ban (2001) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 4.00 None 5.00 None 268 119 None None None None None
13399 13399 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10068 10068 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 1 year post avoparcin ban (2001) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 32.00 None 27.00 None 268 119 None None None None None
13400 13400 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10068 10068 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 1 year post avoparcin ban (2001) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 49.00 None 37.00 None 268 119 None None None None None
13401 13401 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10068 10068 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 1 year post avoparcin ban (2001) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 86.00 None 90.00 None 268 119 None None None None None
13402 13402 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10072 10072 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. **Gentamicin listed as high-level** 1 year post avoparcin ban (2001) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 6.00 None 11.00 None 268 119 None None None None None
13403 13403 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10068 10068 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 1 year post avoparcin ban (2001) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials penicillins, combinations with other antibacterials None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 69.00 None 61.00 None 268 119 None None None None None
13404 13404 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10068 10068 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 1 year post avoparcin ban (2001) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 98.00 None 99.00 None 268 119 None None None None None
13405 13405 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10070 10070 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 3 years post avoparcin ban (2003) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 11 None 22 None None None None None 299 161 None None None None None
13406 13406 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10070 10070 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 3 years post avoparcin ban (2003) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 4 None None None None None 300 119 None None None None None
13407 13407 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10069 10069 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 2 years post avoparcin ban (2002) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 22 None 22 None None None None None 278 161 None None None None None
13408 13408 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10069 10069 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 2 years post avoparcin ban (2002) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 2 None 4 None None None None None 280 119 None None None None None
13409 13409 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10068 10068 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 1 year post avoparcin ban (2001) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 21 None 22 None None None None None 283 161 None None None None None
13410 13410 10029 None 11027 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01189.x Lauderdale2007 Effect of banning vancomycin analogue avoparcin on vancomycin-resistant enterococci in chicken farms in Taiwan: Brief report China Observational 10068 10068 Avoparcin Ban Avoparcin was banned from use as an animal feed additive in 2000. Prior to ban, 63% of feed-mills used avoparcin. 1 year post avoparcin ban (2001) Year of avoparcin ban (2000) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 1 None 4 None None None None None 268 119 None None None None None
13411 13411 10331 None 13645 10.1089/mdr.1998.4.289 Sunde_1998_MicrDrugResi Antibiotic resistance in escherichia coli of the normal intestinal flora of swine Norway Observational 10984 10984 AMU Low vs High level of exposure High Low Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 30 None 70 None None None None None 32 81 None None None None None
13412 13412 10331 None 13645 10.1089/mdr.1998.4.289 Sunde_1998_MicrDrugResi Antibiotic resistance in escherichia coli of the normal intestinal flora of swine Norway Observational 10984 10984 AMU Low vs High level of exposure High Low Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 28 None 57 None None None None None 32 81 None None None None None
13413 13413 10331 None 13645 10.1089/mdr.1998.4.289 Sunde_1998_MicrDrugResi Antibiotic resistance in escherichia coli of the normal intestinal flora of swine Norway Observational 10984 10984 AMU Low vs High level of exposure High Low Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 29 None 55 None None None None None 32 81 None None None None None
13414 13414 10331 None 13645 10.1089/mdr.1998.4.289 Sunde_1998_MicrDrugResi Antibiotic resistance in escherichia coli of the normal intestinal flora of swine Norway Observational 10984 10984 AMU Low vs High level of exposure High Low Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 14 None 8 None None None None None 32 81 None None None None None
13415 13415 10331 None 13645 10.1089/mdr.1998.4.289 Sunde_1998_MicrDrugResi Antibiotic resistance in escherichia coli of the normal intestinal flora of swine Norway Observational 10985 10985 AMU Low vs Medium level of exposure Medium Low Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 70 None None None None None 21 81 None None None None None
13416 13416 10331 None 13645 10.1089/mdr.1998.4.289 Sunde_1998_MicrDrugResi Antibiotic resistance in escherichia coli of the normal intestinal flora of swine Norway Observational 10985 10985 AMU Low vs Medium level of exposure Medium Low Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 17 None 57 None None None None None 21 81 None None None None None
13417 13417 10331 None 13645 10.1089/mdr.1998.4.289 Sunde_1998_MicrDrugResi Antibiotic resistance in escherichia coli of the normal intestinal flora of swine Norway Observational 10985 10985 AMU Low vs Medium level of exposure Medium Low Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 55 None None None None None 21 81 None None None None None
13418 13418 10331 None 13645 10.1089/mdr.1998.4.289 Sunde_1998_MicrDrugResi Antibiotic resistance in escherichia coli of the normal intestinal flora of swine Norway Observational 10985 10985 AMU Low vs Medium level of exposure Medium Low Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 8 None None None None None 21 81 None None None None None
13419 13419 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10992 10992 Flavophospholipol use 9 mg of flavophospholipol/ kg in feed Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 54 55 None None None None None
13420 13420 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10992 10992 Flavophospholipol use 9 mg of flavophospholipol/ kg in feed Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 54 55 None None None None None
13421 13421 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10992 10992 Flavophospholipol use 9 mg of flavophospholipol/ kg in feed Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 13.00 None 78.00 None 54 55 None None None None None
13422 13422 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10992 10992 Flavophospholipol use 9 mg of flavophospholipol/ kg in feed Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 54 55 None None None None None
13423 13423 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10992 10992 Flavophospholipol use 9 mg of flavophospholipol/ kg in feed Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 96.00 None 100.00 None 54 55 None None None None None
13424 13424 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10992 10992 Flavophospholipol use 9 mg of flavophospholipol/ kg in feed Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 98.00 None 100.00 None 54 55 None None None None None
13425 13425 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10992 10992 Flavophospholipol use 9 mg of flavophospholipol/ kg in feed Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 54 55 None None None None None
13426 13426 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10992 10992 Flavophospholipol use 9 mg of flavophospholipol/ kg in feed Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials penicillins, combinations with other antibacterials None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 54 55 None None None None None
13427 13427 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10990 10990 Avoparcin use 15 mg/kg in feed Avoparcin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 53 55 None None None None None
13428 13428 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10990 10990 Avoparcin use 15 mg/kg in feed Avoparcin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 53 55 None None None None None
13429 13429 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10990 10990 Avoparcin use 15 mg/kg in feed Avoparcin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 17.00 None 78.00 None 53 55 None None None None None
13430 13430 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10990 10990 Avoparcin use 15 mg/kg in feed Avoparcin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 53 55 None None None None None
13431 13431 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10990 10990 Avoparcin use 15 mg/kg in feed Avoparcin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 98.00 None 100.00 None 53 55 None None None None None
13432 13432 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10990 10990 Avoparcin use 15 mg/kg in feed Avoparcin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 53 55 None None None None None
13433 13433 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10990 10990 Avoparcin use 15 mg/kg in feed Avoparcin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 53 55 None None None None None
13434 13434 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10990 10990 Avoparcin use 15 mg/kg in feed Avoparcin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials penicillins, combinations with other antibacterials None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 53 55 None None None None None
13435 13435 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10990 10990 Avoparcin use 15 mg/kg in feed Avoparcin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 25.00 None 7.00 None 53 55 None None None None None
13436 13436 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10990 10990 Avoparcin use 15 mg/kg in feed Avoparcin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 4.00 None 53 55 None None None None None
13437 13437 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10990 10990 Avoparcin use 15 mg/kg in feed Avoparcin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 53 55 None None None None None
13438 13438 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10991 10991 Avoparcin use 15 mg/kg in feed. AMR = flavosphospholipol Avoparcin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None None None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 28.00 None 13.00 None 53 55 None None None None None
13439 13439 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10990 10990 Avoparcin use 15 mg/kg in feed Avoparcin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 72.00 None 44.00 None 53 55 None None None None None
13441 13441 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10992 10992 Flavophospholipol use 9 mg of flavophospholipol/ kg in feed Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 26.00 None 7.00 None 54 55 None None None None None
13442 13442 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10992 10992 Flavophospholipol use 9 mg of flavophospholipol/ kg in feed Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 4.00 None 54 55 None None None None None
13443 13443 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10992 10992 Flavophospholipol use 9 mg of flavophospholipol/ kg in feed Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 54 55 None None None None None
13444 13444 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10992 10992 Flavophospholipol use 9 mg of flavophospholipol/ kg in feed Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 41.00 None 44.00 None 54 55 None None None None None
13445 13445 10334 None 14026 10.1128/AAC.46.1.110-118.2002 van.den.Bogaard_2002_AntAgeandChe Effects of Flavophospholipol on Resistance in Fecal Escherichia coli and Enterococci of Fattening Pigs Netherlands None 10993 10993 Flavophospholipol use 9 mg of flavophospholipol/kg in feed. AMR = flavophospholipol. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None None None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 43.00 None 13.00 None 54 55 None None None None None
13447 13447 10058 None 11623 10.1128/aem.71.9.4986-4991.2005 McDermott2005 Changes in Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Native Enterococcus faecium in Chickens Fed Virginiamycin United States of America Experimental 10153 10153 Virginiamycin use The treatment group received 20g/ton of virginiamycin in the feed, and the control group received nonmedicated feed. Virginiamycin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus Other False None False 24 None 17 None None None None None 25 18 None None None None None
13448 13448 10075 None 12063 10.1186/1751-0147-55-46 Nilsson2013 Proof of concept for eradication of vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium from broiler farms. Sweden Experimental 10211 10211 Farm disinfection with combination of steam and formaldehyde 2 batches after disinfection. Disinfection included 90g of Formalin (23% per cubic meter) in addition to normal cleaning. Control (Farm A) normal cleaning routine included pressure wash and disinfection with a glutaraldehyde. Disinfection with steam and formaldehyde Normal cleaning routine (Farm A) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 10 10 None None None None None
13449 13449 10075 None 12063 10.1186/1751-0147-55-46 Nilsson2013 Proof of concept for eradication of vancomycin resistant Enterococcus faecium from broiler farms. Sweden Experimental 10212 10212 Farm disinfection with combination of steam and formaldehyde 2 batches after disinfection. Disinfection included 90g of Formalin (23% per cubic meter) in addition to normal cleaning. Control (Farm B) normal cleaning routine included pressure wash and disinfection with chloride compound. Disinfection with steam and formaldehyde Normal cleaning routine (Farm B) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 10 20 None None None None None
13450 13450 10093 None 12773 10.1136/vr.152.3.80 Regula2003 Reduced antibiotic resistance to fluoroquinolones and streptomycin in 'animalfriendly' pig fattening farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10253 10253 Farm system type Animal-friendly systems had pens with several separate areas, straw bedding, and an outdoor yard with a concrete floor to allow the pigs to exercise. Traditional farms were complete confinement operations, with completely or partially slatted floor pens. Animal-friendly farm Traditional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 19.00 None 20.70 None 142 121 None None None None None
13451 13451 10093 None 12773 10.1136/vr.152.3.80 Regula2003 Reduced antibiotic resistance to fluoroquinolones and streptomycin in 'animalfriendly' pig fattening farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10253 10253 Farm system type Animal-friendly systems had pens with several separate areas, straw bedding, and an outdoor yard with a concrete floor to allow the pigs to exercise. Traditional farms were complete confinement operations, with completely or partially slatted floor pens. Animal-friendly farm Traditional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 20.40 None 31.40 None 142 121 None None None None None
13452 13452 10093 None 12773 10.1136/vr.152.3.80 Regula2003 Reduced antibiotic resistance to fluoroquinolones and streptomycin in 'animalfriendly' pig fattening farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10253 10253 Farm system type Animal-friendly systems had pens with several separate areas, straw bedding, and an outdoor yard with a concrete floor to allow the pigs to exercise. Traditional farms were complete confinement operations, with completely or partially slatted floor pens. Animal-friendly farm Traditional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 19.70 None 31.40 None 142 121 None None None None None
13453 13453 10093 None 12773 10.1136/vr.152.3.80 Regula2003 Reduced antibiotic resistance to fluoroquinolones and streptomycin in 'animalfriendly' pig fattening farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10253 10253 Farm system type Animal-friendly systems had pens with several separate areas, straw bedding, and an outdoor yard with a concrete floor to allow the pigs to exercise. Traditional farms were complete confinement operations, with completely or partially slatted floor pens. Animal-friendly farm Traditional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 6.30 None 12.40 None 142 121 None None None None None
13454 13454 10093 None 12773 10.1136/vr.152.3.80 Regula2003 Reduced antibiotic resistance to fluoroquinolones and streptomycin in 'animalfriendly' pig fattening farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10253 10253 Farm system type Animal-friendly systems had pens with several separate areas, straw bedding, and an outdoor yard with a concrete floor to allow the pigs to exercise. Traditional farms were complete confinement operations, with completely or partially slatted floor pens. Animal-friendly farm Traditional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 2.50 None 142 121 None None None None None
13455 13455 10093 None 12773 10.1136/vr.152.3.80 Regula2003 Reduced antibiotic resistance to fluoroquinolones and streptomycin in 'animalfriendly' pig fattening farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10253 10253 Farm system type Animal-friendly systems had pens with several separate areas, straw bedding, and an outdoor yard with a concrete floor to allow the pigs to exercise. Traditional farms were complete confinement operations, with completely or partially slatted floor pens. Animal-friendly farm Traditional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials polymyxins, combinations with other antibacterials None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 2.10 None 1.70 None 142 121 None None None None None
13456 13456 10093 None 12773 10.1136/vr.152.3.80 Regula2003 Reduced antibiotic resistance to fluoroquinolones and streptomycin in 'animalfriendly' pig fattening farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10253 10253 Farm system type Animal-friendly systems had pens with several separate areas, straw bedding, and an outdoor yard with a concrete floor to allow the pigs to exercise. Traditional farms were complete confinement operations, with completely or partially slatted floor pens. Animal-friendly farm Traditional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 142 121 None None None None None
13457 13457 10093 None 12773 10.1136/vr.152.3.80 Regula2003 Reduced antibiotic resistance to fluoroquinolones and streptomycin in 'animalfriendly' pig fattening farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10253 10253 Farm system type Animal-friendly systems had pens with several separate areas, straw bedding, and an outdoor yard with a concrete floor to allow the pigs to exercise. Traditional farms were complete confinement operations, with completely or partially slatted floor pens. Animal-friendly farm Traditional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 142 121 None None None None None
13458 13458 10093 None 12773 10.1136/vr.152.3.80 Regula2003 Reduced antibiotic resistance to fluoroquinolones and streptomycin in 'animalfriendly' pig fattening farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10253 10253 Farm system type Animal-friendly systems had pens with several separate areas, straw bedding, and an outdoor yard with a concrete floor to allow the pigs to exercise. Traditional farms were complete confinement operations, with completely or partially slatted floor pens. Animal-friendly farm Traditional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 73.90 None 85.10 None 142 121 None None None None None
13459 13459 10365 None 7853 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-237 Bester_2012_JoofFoPr Observational study of the prevalence and antibiotic resistance of campylobacter spp. from different poultry production systems in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa South Africa Observational 11070 11070 Production Type Commercial free-range broilers were sampled from a single in-house abattoir (5-8 weeks old). Samples from industrialized chickens (5-8 weeks old) were collected from 4 abattoirs. Antibiotics are utilized therapeutically and prophylactically in both groups Commercial Free-Range Industrial Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Other False None False None None None None 95.40 None 15.90 None 66 63 None None None None None
13460 13460 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 63 45 None None None None None
13461 13461 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 3 None 3 None None None None None 63 45 None None None None None
40213 40213 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11324 11324 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
13463 13463 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 11 None 27 None None None None None 63 45 None None None None None
13464 13464 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Antibiotics bambermycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 1 None 4 None None None None None 63 45 None None None None None
13465 13465 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 0 None 5 None None None None None 63 45 None None None None None
13466 13466 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 5 None 11 None None None None None 63 45 None None None None None
13467 13467 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Lincosamides lincomycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 63 None 45 None None None None None 63 45 None None None None None
13469 13469 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 3 None 3 None None None None None 63 45 None None None None None
13470 13470 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials penicillins, combinations with other antibacterials None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 0 None 3 None None None None None 63 45 None None None None None
13471 13471 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 7 None 16 None None None None None 63 45 None None None None None
13472 13472 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 38 None 7 None None None None None 63 45 None None None None None
13473 13473 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 63 None 43 None None None None None 63 45 None None None None None
13475 13475 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 13 None 29 None None None None None 63 45 None None None None None
13477 13477 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 18 42 None None None None None
13478 13478 10362 None 7794 10.3382/ps.0591405 Benazet_1980_Poulscie Effect of nosiheptide as a feed additive in chicks on the quantity, duration, prevalence of excretion, and resistance to antibacterial agents of Salmonella typhimurium; on the proportion of Escherichia coli and other coliforms resistant to antibacterial a France Experimental 11064 11064 Nosiheptide Use From Experiment 2. At 16 days old, one group of chicks began receiving nosiheptide-supplemented feed at 20 g/t, while the other group was fed a diet without nosiheptide. 33 days later, feces samples were taken. Nosiheptide Use No Use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 14 None None None None None 34 27 None None None None None
13479 13479 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 9 None 26 None None None None None 18 42 None None None None None
13480 13480 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 1 None 4 None None None None None 18 42 None None None None None
13481 13481 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Antibiotics bambermycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 14 None 21 None None None None None 18 42 None None None None None
13482 13482 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 9 None None None None None 18 42 None None None None None
13483 13483 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 14 None None None None None 18 42 None None None None None
13484 13484 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Lincosamides lincomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 9 None 40 None None None None None 18 42 None None None None None
13485 13485 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 7 None 31 None None None None None 18 42 None None None None None
13486 13486 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials penicillins, combinations with other antibacterials None Enterococcus faecium False None False 1 None 22 None None None None None 18 42 None None None None None
13487 13487 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 1 None 4 None None None None None 18 42 None None None None None
13488 13488 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 1 None 8 None None None None None 18 42 None None None None None
13489 13489 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecium False None False 4 None 36 None None None None None 18 42 None None None None None
13490 13490 10102 None 13083 10.1289/ehp.1003350 Sapkota2011 Lower Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Enterococci on U.S. Conventional Poultry Farms that Transitioned to Organic Practices United States of America Observational 10273 10273 Newly organic farming Litter samples from farms. Organic farms were previously large-scale conventional farms and were producing their first flock of certified organic broilers. Conventional farms were large-scale, maintaining conventional practices and using antibiotics. Organic farming Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 3 None None None None None 18 42 None None None None None
13491 13491 10109 None 13175 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.004 Schuppers2005 Clinical herd health, farm management and antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli on finishing pig farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10303 10303 Type of farm farrow-to-finish or finishing pigs only Finishing pigs only Farrow-to-finish Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 31 28 3 2 None None None None 59 5 None None None None None
13492 13492 10109 None 13175 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.004 Schuppers2005 Clinical herd health, farm management and antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli on finishing pig farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10296 10296 Housing system indoor production with slatted floors or ‘animal-friendly’ system with straw bedding and outdoor access Straw bedding and outdoor access Indoor production Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 17 19 17 11 None None None None 36 28 None None None None None
13493 13493 10109 None 13175 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.004 Schuppers2005 Clinical herd health, farm management and antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli on finishing pig farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10297 10297 Number of finishing buildings Number of finishing buildings >1 finishing building 1 finishing building Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 10 8 24 22 None None None None 18 46 None None None None None
13494 13494 10109 None 13175 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.004 Schuppers2005 Clinical herd health, farm management and antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli on finishing pig farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10286 10286 Age of building Age of finishing buildings Age of building > 5 years Age of building < or = 5 years Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 18 13 16 17 None None None None 31 33 None None None None None
13495 13495 10109 None 13175 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.004 Schuppers2005 Clinical herd health, farm management and antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli on finishing pig farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10295 10295 Finishing-pig spaces Number of finishing-pig spaces on the farm 101-200 >200 Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 11 12 13 10 None None None None 23 23 None None None None None
13496 13496 10109 None 13175 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.004 Schuppers2005 Clinical herd health, farm management and antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli on finishing pig farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10294 10294 Finishing-pig spaces Number of finishing-pig spaces on the farm < or = 100 >200 Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 10 8 13 10 None None None None 18 23 None None None None None
13497 13497 10109 None 13175 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.004 Schuppers2005 Clinical herd health, farm management and antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli on finishing pig farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10302 10302 Suppliers for finishing pigs Number of suppliers for finishing pigs 03-Feb >3 Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 13 11 10 7 None None None None 24 17 None None None None None
13498 13498 10109 None 13175 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.004 Schuppers2005 Clinical herd health, farm management and antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli on finishing pig farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10301 10301 Suppliers for finishing pigs Number of suppliers for finishing pigs < or = 1 >3 Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 11 12 10 7 None None None None 23 17 None None None None None
13499 13499 10109 None 13175 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.004 Schuppers2005 Clinical herd health, farm management and antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli on finishing pig farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10288 10288 Animal flow Animal flow Partially all-in-all-out animal flow Continuous animal flow Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 4 2 15 15 None None None None 6 30 None None None None None
13500 13500 10109 None 13175 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.004 Schuppers2005 Clinical herd health, farm management and antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli on finishing pig farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10289 10289 Animal flow Animal flow Strict all-in-all-out animal flow Continuous animal flow Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 15 13 15 15 None None None None 28 30 None None None None None
13501 13501 10109 None 13175 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.004 Schuppers2005 Clinical herd health, farm management and antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli on finishing pig farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10291 10291 Disinfection of pens Disinfection of pens between batches Yes disinfection of pens No disinfection of pens Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 8 7 26 23 None None None None 15 49 None None None None None
13502 13502 10109 None 13175 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.004 Schuppers2005 Clinical herd health, farm management and antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli on finishing pig farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10299 10299 Rodent control Rodent control Yes rodent control No rodent control Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 9 11 25 19 None None None None 20 44 None None None None None
13503 13503 10109 None 13175 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.004 Schuppers2005 Clinical herd health, farm management and antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli on finishing pig farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10300 10300 Routine worming Routine worming of feeder pigs Yes routine worming No routine worming Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 25 19 9 11 None None None None 44 20 None None None None None
13504 13504 10109 None 13175 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.004 Schuppers2005 Clinical herd health, farm management and antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli on finishing pig farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10293 10293 Feeding strategy Feeding strategy Ad libitum feeding strategy Restricted feeding strategy Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 4 7 30 23 None None None None 11 53 None None None None None
13505 13505 10109 None 13175 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.004 Schuppers2005 Clinical herd health, farm management and antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli on finishing pig farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10304 10304 Whey feeding Did the feeding ration include whey? Yes whey feeding No whey feeding Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 16 20 18 10 None None None None 36 28 None None None None None
13506 13506 10109 None 13175 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.004 Schuppers2005 Clinical herd health, farm management and antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli on finishing pig farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10290 10290 Antimicrobial treatment Assessed by asking farmers about the use of medicated feed, and the treatment of individual animals or groups of animals Yes antimicrobial treatment No antimicrobial treatment Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 11 9 23 21 None None None None 20 44 None None None None None
13507 13507 10109 None 13175 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.004 Schuppers2005 Clinical herd health, farm management and antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli on finishing pig farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10305 10305 Worming Worming Yes worming No worming Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.20 0.10 0.70 0.008 None
13508 13508 10109 None 13175 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.004 Schuppers2005 Clinical herd health, farm management and antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli on finishing pig farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10298 10298 Number of pig houses Number of pig houses >1 pig houses 1 house Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.50 1.50 8.10 0.005 None
13509 13509 10109 None 13175 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.004 Schuppers2005 Clinical herd health, farm management and antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli on finishing pig farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10287 10287 Age of finishing building Age of finishing building < or = 5 years >5 years Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.50 0.20 1.00 0.04 None
13510 13510 10109 None 13175 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.02.004 Schuppers2005 Clinical herd health, farm management and antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli on finishing pig farms in Switzerland Switzerland Observational 10292 10292 Feeding strategy Feeding strategy Ad libitum Restricted Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 5.90 2.50 13.40 <0.001 None
13511 13511 10362 None 7794 10.3382/ps.0591405 Benazet_1980_Poulscie Effect of nosiheptide as a feed additive in chicks on the quantity, duration, prevalence of excretion, and resistance to antibacterial agents of Salmonella typhimurium; on the proportion of Escherichia coli and other coliforms resistant to antibacterial a France Experimental 11064 11064 Nosiheptide Use From Experiment 2. At 16 days old, one group of chicks began receiving nosiheptide-supplemented feed at 20 g/t, while the other group was fed a diet without nosiheptide. 33 days later, feces samples were taken. Nosiheptide Use No Use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives furazolidone None Escherichia coli False None False 17 None 15 None None None None None 34 27 None None None None None
13512 13512 10365 None 7853 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-237 Bester_2012_JoofFoPr Observational study of the prevalence and antibiotic resistance of campylobacter spp. from different poultry production systems in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa South Africa Observational 11070 11070 Production Type Commercial free-range broilers were sampled from a single in-house abattoir (5-8 weeks old). Samples from industrialized chickens (5-8 weeks old) were collected from 4 abattoirs. Antibiotics are utilized therapeutically and prophylactically in both groups Commercial Free-Range Industrial Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Other False None False None None None None 100.00 None 98.90 None 66 63 None None None None None
13513 13513 10365 None 7853 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-237 Bester_2012_JoofFoPr Observational study of the prevalence and antibiotic resistance of campylobacter spp. from different poultry production systems in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa South Africa Observational 11070 11070 Production Type Commercial free-range broilers were sampled from a single in-house abattoir (5-8 weeks old). Samples from industrialized chickens (5-8 weeks old) were collected from 4 abattoirs. Antibiotics are utilized therapeutically and prophylactically in both groups Commercial Free-Range Industrial Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Other False None False None None None None 87.90 None 47.60 None 66 63 None None None None None
13514 13514 10365 None 7853 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-237 Bester_2012_JoofFoPr Observational study of the prevalence and antibiotic resistance of campylobacter spp. from different poultry production systems in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa South Africa Observational 11070 11070 Production Type Commercial free-range broilers were sampled from a single in-house abattoir (5-8 weeks old). Samples from industrialized chickens (5-8 weeks old) were collected from 4 abattoirs. Antibiotics are utilized therapeutically and prophylactically in both groups Commercial Free-Range Industrial Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter Other False None False None None None None 1.60 None 1.70 None 61 60 None None None None None
13515 13515 10365 None 7853 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-237 Bester_2012_JoofFoPr Observational study of the prevalence and antibiotic resistance of campylobacter spp. from different poultry production systems in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa South Africa Observational 11070 11070 Production Type Commercial free-range broilers were sampled from a single in-house abattoir (5-8 weeks old). Samples from industrialized chickens (5-8 weeks old) were collected from 4 abattoirs. Antibiotics are utilized therapeutically and prophylactically in both groups Commercial Free-Range Industrial Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Campylobacter Other False None False None None None None 11.50 None 16.40 None 61 55 None None None None None
13516 13516 10363 None 7796 10.1371/journal.pone.0143995 Benedict_2015_PLoONE Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli recovered from feedlot cattle and associations with antimicrobial use Canada Observational 11067 11067 Tetracycline Use Population-averaged odds ratio describes the odds of recovering tetracycline-resistant isolates given administration of 3 ADD (animal defined daily dose) individual parenteral tetracycline, compared to unexposed cattle. Tetracycline Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.32 1.01 1.73 0.04 None
13517 13517 10363 None 7796 10.1371/journal.pone.0143995 Benedict_2015_PLoONE Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli recovered from feedlot cattle and associations with antimicrobial use Canada Observational 11068 11068 Tetracycline Use Population-averaged odds ratio describes the odds of recovering tetracycline-resistant isolates given administration of 7 ADD (animal defined daily dose) individual in-feed tetracycline, compared to unexposed cattle. Tetracycline Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.18 1.03 1.35 0.01 None
13518 13518 10363 None 7796 10.1371/journal.pone.0143995 Benedict_2015_PLoONE Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli recovered from feedlot cattle and associations with antimicrobial use Canada Observational 11069 11069 Tetracycline Use Population-averaged odds ratio describes the odds of recovering trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole-resistant isolates given administration of 3 ADD (animal defined daily dose) individual parenteral tetracycline, compared to unexposed cattle. Tetracycline Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.59 1.72 3.89 0.001 None
13519 13519 10363 None 7796 10.1371/journal.pone.0143995 Benedict_2015_PLoONE Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli recovered from feedlot cattle and associations with antimicrobial use Canada Observational 11066 11066 Beta lactam Use Population-averaged odds ratio describes the odds of recovering streptomycin-resistant isolates given administration of 3 ADD (animal defined daily dose) individual parenteral beta lactam, compared to unexposed cattle. Beta lactam Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.32 0.08 1.25 0.01 None
13522 13522 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 8 11 None None None None None
13523 13523 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 3 None 5 None None None None None 8 11 None None None None None
13524 13524 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 8 11 None None None None None
13525 13525 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 8 11 None None None None None
13526 13526 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False 7 None 9 None None None None None 8 11 None None None None None
13527 13527 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 7 None 9 None None None None None 8 11 None None None None None
13528 13528 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 8 11 None None None None None
13529 13529 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 8 11 None None None None None
13530 13530 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Salmonella spp. False None False 7 None 9 None None None None None 8 11 None None None None None
13532 13532 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 2 None 0 None None None None None 4 12 None None None None None
13534 13534 10360 None 7770 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.06.004 Bednorz_2013_InJoofMeMi The broader context of antibiotic resistance: Zinc feed supplementation of piglets increases the proportion of multi-resistant Escherichia coli in vivo Germany Experimental 11061 11061 Zinc Use Feed was supplemented with zinc at 50 mg/kg (referent), and 2500 mg/kg (exposed). The zinc level was adjusted by supplementation of corn starch with analytical grade zinc oxide. E. coli was isolated from ileum and colon digesta post-euthanasia. High Dose Zinc Supplementation Background Dose Zinc Supplementation Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 5 None None None None None 11 12 None None None None None
13535 13535 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 4 12 None None None None None
13536 13536 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 4 None 12 None None None None None 4 12 None None None None None
13537 13537 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 4 12 None None None None None
13538 13538 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Lincosamides lincomycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 4 None 12 None None None None None 4 12 None None None None None
13539 13539 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 4 12 None None None None None
13540 13540 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 4 None 12 None None None None None 4 12 None None None None None
13541 13541 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 4 None 12 None None None None None 4 12 None None None None None
13542 13542 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 4 None 12 None None None None None 4 12 None None None None None
13543 13543 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 8 9 None None None None None
13544 13544 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 4 None 1 None None None None None 8 9 None None None None None
13545 13545 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 7 None 6 None None None None None 8 9 None None None None None
13546 13546 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 8 9 None None None None None
13547 13547 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Lincosamides lincomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 7 None 6 None None None None None 8 9 None None None None None
13548 13548 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins benzylpenicillin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 5 None 0 None None None None None 8 9 None None None None None
13549 13549 10360 None 7770 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.06.004 Bednorz_2013_InJoofMeMi The broader context of antibiotic resistance: Zinc feed supplementation of piglets increases the proportion of multi-resistant Escherichia coli in vivo Germany Experimental 11061 11061 Zinc Use Feed was supplemented with zinc at 50 mg/kg (referent), and 2500 mg/kg (exposed). The zinc level was adjusted by supplementation of corn starch with analytical grade zinc oxide. E. coli was isolated from ileum and colon digesta post-euthanasia. High Dose Zinc Supplementation Background Dose Zinc Supplementation Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 3 None None None None None 11 12 None None None None None
13550 13550 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 4 None 5 None None None None None 8 9 None None None None None
13551 13551 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 7 None 5 None None None None None 8 9 None None None None None
13552 13552 10360 None 7770 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.06.004 Bednorz_2013_InJoofMeMi The broader context of antibiotic resistance: Zinc feed supplementation of piglets increases the proportion of multi-resistant Escherichia coli in vivo Germany Experimental 11062 11062 Zinc Use Feed was supplemented with zinc at 50 mg/kg (referent), and 2500 mg/kg (exposed). The zinc level was adjusted by supplementing corn starch with analytical grade zinc oxide. E. coli isolated from ileum/colon digesta. Recorded as sulfonamide/trimethoprim. High Dose Zinc Supplementation Background Dose Zinc Supplementation Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 4 None None None None None 11 12 None None None None None
13553 13553 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecium False None False 7 None 6 None None None None None 8 9 None None None None None
13554 13554 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 7 None 6 None None None None None 8 9 None None None None None
13555 13555 10167 None 9001 10.1089/fpd.2010.0686 Edrington2011 Influence of weaning on fecal shedding of pathogenic bacteria in dairy calves United States of America Observational 10491 10491 Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Pre- Vs.postweaned dairy calves Postweaning Preweaning Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins benzylpenicillin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 4 12 None None None None None
13556 13556 10360 None 7770 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.06.004 Bednorz_2013_InJoofMeMi The broader context of antibiotic resistance: Zinc feed supplementation of piglets increases the proportion of multi-resistant Escherichia coli in vivo Germany Experimental 11061 11061 Zinc Use Feed was supplemented with zinc at 50 mg/kg (referent), and 2500 mg/kg (exposed). The zinc level was adjusted by supplementation of corn starch with analytical grade zinc oxide. E. coli was isolated from ileum and colon digesta post-euthanasia. High Dose Zinc Supplementation Background Dose Zinc Supplementation Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column tet(A) Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 3 None None None None None 11 12 None None None None None
13557 13557 10360 None 7770 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.06.004 Bednorz_2013_InJoofMeMi The broader context of antibiotic resistance: Zinc feed supplementation of piglets increases the proportion of multi-resistant Escherichia coli in vivo Germany Experimental 11061 11061 Zinc Use Feed was supplemented with zinc at 50 mg/kg (referent), and 2500 mg/kg (exposed). The zinc level was adjusted by supplementation of corn starch with analytical grade zinc oxide. E. coli was isolated from ileum and colon digesta post-euthanasia. High Dose Zinc Supplementation Background Dose Zinc Supplementation Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column tet(B) Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 0 None None None None None 11 12 None None None None None
13558 13558 10362 None 7794 10.3382/ps.0591405 Benazet_1980_Poulscie Effect of nosiheptide as a feed additive in chicks on the quantity, duration, prevalence of excretion, and resistance to antibacterial agents of Salmonella typhimurium; on the proportion of Escherichia coli and other coliforms resistant to antibacterial a France Experimental 11063 11063 Nosiheptide Use From Experiment 1. At 16 days old, one group began receiving nosiheptide-supplemented feed at 20 g/t. 5 days later, both groups were orally inoculated with Salmonella typhimurium (6.4 x 10^5 organisms/mL). Day 28 post-inoculation data was extracted. Nosiheptide Use No Use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 10 9 None None None None None
13559 13559 10362 None 7794 10.3382/ps.0591405 Benazet_1980_Poulscie Effect of nosiheptide as a feed additive in chicks on the quantity, duration, prevalence of excretion, and resistance to antibacterial agents of Salmonella typhimurium; on the proportion of Escherichia coli and other coliforms resistant to antibacterial a France Experimental 11063 11063 Nosiheptide Use From Experiment 1. At 16 days old, one group began receiving nosiheptide-supplemented feed at 20 g/t. 5 days later, both groups were orally inoculated with Salmonella typhimurium (6.4 x 10^5 organisms/mL). Day 28 post-inoculation data was extracted. Nosiheptide Use No Use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 10 9 None None None None None
13561 13561 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 0.60 99.40 0.00 100.00 164 164 None None None None None
13562 13562 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 164 164 None None None None None
13563 13563 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 164 164 None None None None None
13564 13564 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 3.60 96.40 14.60 85.30 164 164 None None None <0.05 None
13565 13565 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines doxycycline None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 54.90 45.10 81.70 18.30 164 164 None None None <0.05 None
13566 13566 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 1.80 98.20 9.10 91.40 164 164 None None None <0.05 None
13567 13567 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 78.70 21.40 78.00 21.90 164 164 None None None None None
13568 13568 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols florfenicol None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 164 164 None None None None None
13569 13569 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 4.20 95.70 5.50 94.50 164 164 None None None None None
13570 13570 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10313 10313 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Gentamicin listed as high-level). Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 0.00 100.00 1.80 98.20 164 164 None None None None None
13571 13571 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 13.40 86.70 6.10 93.80 164 164 None None None <0.05 None
13572 13572 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials linezolid None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 1.20 98.80 0.00 100.00 164 164 None None None None None
13573 13573 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins mezlocillin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 1.20 98.10 0.60 99.40 164 164 None None None None None
13574 13574 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones moxifloxacin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 0.60 99.30 1.80 98.10 164 164 None None None None None
13575 13575 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 0.60 99.40 0.60 99.40 164 164 None None None None None
13576 13576 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics rifampicin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 73.20 26.80 34.80 65.30 164 164 None None None <0.05 None
13577 13577 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10314 10314 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Streptomycin listed as high-level). Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 10.40 89.60 25.60 74.40 164 164 None None None <0.05 None
13579 13579 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials teicoplanin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 164 164 None None None None None
13580 13580 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 14.00 86.00 38.40 61.60 164 164 None None None <0.05 None
13581 13581 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 0.00 100.00 0.60 99.40 164 164 None None None None None
13582 13582 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 55 29 None None None None None
13583 13583 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 3.80 96.10 6.90 93.00 55 29 None None None None None
13584 13584 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 55 29 None None None None None
13585 13585 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 42.30 57.60 55.10 44.80 55 29 None None None None None
13586 13586 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Lincosamides clindamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 19.10 80.70 65.40 34.30 55 29 None None None None None
13587 13587 10363 None 7796 10.1371/journal.pone.0143995 Benedict_2015_PLoONE Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli recovered from feedlot cattle and associations with antimicrobial use Canada Observational 11065 11065 Antimicrobial Use See Table S1 for AMU info (dosage, etc.) Pen-level and individual AMU exposure prevalence over time is in Tables 3-4. Referent: first sample, taken at placement (pre-exposure). Exposed: second sample taken anywhere from 33-120+ days post-exposure Antimicrobial Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 2031 None 428 None None None None None 2725 2379 None None None None None
13588 13588 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines doxycycline None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 15.30 84.60 41.40 58.60 55 29 None None None None None
13589 13589 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 46.20 53.80 58.60 41.30 55 29 None None None None None
13590 13590 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 76.90 23.10 65.50 34.30 55 29 None None None None None
13591 13591 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols florfenicol None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 55 29 None None None None None
13592 13592 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 34.60 65.40 24.10 75.80 55 29 None None None None None
13593 13593 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10312 10312 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Gentamicin listed as high-level) Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 55 29 None None None None None
13594 13594 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 73.00 26.90 31.00 68.90 55 29 None None None None None
13595 13595 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials linezolid None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 3.80 96.10 0.00 100.00 55 29 None None None None None
13596 13596 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins mezlocillin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 26.90 73.00 27.60 72.40 55 29 None None None None None
13597 13597 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones moxifloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 30.80 69.30 48.20 51.60 55 29 None None None None None
13598 13598 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 3.80 96.20 6.90 93.10 55 29 None None None None None
13599 13599 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10307 10307 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 7.60 92.30 17.20 82.70 55 29 None None None None None
13600 13600 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics rifampicin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 46.10 53.90 41.30 58.60 55 29 None None None None None
13601 13601 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10314 10314 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Streptomycin listed as high-level). Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.00 100.00 6.90 93.10 55 29 None None None None None
13602 13602 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials teicoplanin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 55 29 None None None None None
13603 13603 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 3.80 96.10 3.40 96.50 55 29 None None None None None
13604 13604 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10306 10306 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 55 29 None None None None None
13605 13605 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10308 10308 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Enterococcus raffinosus) Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 213 226 None None None None None
13606 13606 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10308 10308 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Enterococcus raffinosus) Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 0.50 99.50 0.40 99.60 213 226 None None None None None
13607 13607 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10308 10308 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Enterococcus raffinosus) Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 0.90 99.10 0.00 100.00 213 226 None None None None None
13608 13608 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10308 10308 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Enterococcus raffinosus) Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 24.70 75.30 47.30 52.70 213 226 None None None <0.05 None
13609 13609 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10308 10308 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Enterococcus raffinosus) Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines doxycycline None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 55.30 44.70 72.20 27.90 213 226 None None None <0.05 None
13610 13610 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10308 10308 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Enterococcus raffinosus) Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 16.90 83.10 11.50 88.50 213 226 None None None None None
40214 40214 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11324 11324 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
13611 13611 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10308 10308 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Enterococcus raffinosus) Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 74.50 25.60 78.30 21.70 213 226 None None None None None
13612 13612 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10308 10308 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Enterococcus raffinosus) Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols florfenicol None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 213 226 None None None None None
13613 13613 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10308 10308 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Enterococcus raffinosus) Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 14.20 85.80 25.70 74.30 213 226 None None None <0.05 None
13614 13614 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10309 10309 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Enterococcus raffinosus), (Gentamicin listed as high-level). Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 1.40 98.60 1.30 98.70 213 226 None None None None None
13615 13615 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10308 10308 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Enterococcus raffinosus) Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 9.10 90.90 11.50 88.50 213 226 None None None None None
13616 13616 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10308 10308 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Enterococcus raffinosus) Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials linezolid None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 1.40 98.60 0.40 99.60 213 226 None None None None None
13617 13617 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10308 10308 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Enterococcus raffinosus) Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins mezlocillin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 14.10 85.80 10.60 89.40 213 226 None None None None None
13618 13618 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10308 10308 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Enterococcus raffinosus) Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones moxifloxacin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 1.80 98.20 0.90 99.10 213 226 None None None None None
13619 13619 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10308 10308 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Enterococcus raffinosus) Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 7.30 92.70 1.80 98.20 213 226 None None None <0.05 None
13620 13620 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10308 10308 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Enterococcus raffinosus) Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 55.20 44.70 69.50 30.50 213 226 None None None <0.05 None
13621 13621 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10308 10308 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Enterococcus raffinosus) Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics rifampicin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 55.30 44.70 77.90 22.10 213 226 None None None <0.05 None
13622 13622 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10310 10310 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Enterococcus raffinosus), (Streptomycin listed as high-level). Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 1.80 98.20 2.70 97.30 213 226 None None None None None
13623 13623 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10311 10311 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Enterococcus raffinosus). Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials teicoplanin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 213 226 None None None None None
13624 13624 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10311 10311 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Enterococcus raffinosus). Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 2.30 97.70 11.50 88.50 213 226 None None None <0.05 None
13625 13625 10110 None 13177 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01229.x Schwaiger2010 Comparative analysis on antibiotic resistance characteristics of listeria spp. and enterococcus spp. isolated from laying hens and eggs in conventional and organic keeping systems in Bavaria, Germany Germany Observational 10311 10311 Organic keeping system Organic keeping systems compared to conventional keeping systems. (Enterococcus raffinosus). Organic keeping system Conventional keeping system Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None 0.50 99.50 1.80 98.20 213 226 None None None None None
13626 13626 10363 None 7796 10.1371/journal.pone.0143995 Benedict_2015_PLoONE Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli recovered from feedlot cattle and associations with antimicrobial use Canada Observational 11065 11065 Antimicrobial Use See Table S1 for AMU info (dosage, etc.) Pen-level and individual AMU exposure prevalence over time is in Tables 3-4. Referent: first sample, taken at placement (pre-exposure). Exposed: second sample taken anywhere from 33-120+ days post-exposure Antimicrobial Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False 628 None 120 None None None None None 2725 2379 None None None None None
13627 13627 10363 None 7796 10.1371/journal.pone.0143995 Benedict_2015_PLoONE Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli recovered from feedlot cattle and associations with antimicrobial use Canada Observational 11065 11065 Antimicrobial Use See Table S1 for AMU info (dosage, etc.) Pen-level and individual AMU exposure prevalence over time is in Tables 3-4. Referent: first sample, taken at placement (pre-exposure). Exposed: second sample taken anywhere from 33-120+ days post-exposure Antimicrobial Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 552 None 115 None None None None None 2725 2379 None None None None None
13628 13628 10363 None 7796 10.1371/journal.pone.0143995 Benedict_2015_PLoONE Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli recovered from feedlot cattle and associations with antimicrobial use Canada Observational 11065 11065 Antimicrobial Use See Table S1 for AMU info (dosage, etc.) Pen-level and individual AMU exposure prevalence over time is in Tables 3-4. Referent: first sample, taken at placement (pre-exposure). Exposed: second sample taken anywhere from 33-120+ days post-exposure Antimicrobial Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 151 None 18 None None None None None 2725 2379 None None None None None
13629 13629 10363 None 7796 10.1371/journal.pone.0143995 Benedict_2015_PLoONE Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli recovered from feedlot cattle and associations with antimicrobial use Canada Observational 11065 11065 Antimicrobial Use See Table S1 for AMU info (dosage, etc.) Pen-level and individual AMU exposure prevalence over time is in Tables 3-4. Referent: first sample, taken at placement (pre-exposure). Exposed: second sample taken anywhere from 33-120+ days post-exposure Antimicrobial Use No Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 117 None 34 None None None None None 2725 2379 None None None None None
13630 13630 10359 None 7758 10.4315/0362-028X-65.11.1694 Beach_2002_JoofFoPr Serotyping and antibiotic resistance profiling of Salmonella in feedlot and nonfeedlot beef cattle United States of America Observational 11060 11060 Production Type 100 feedlot and 96 non-feedlot adult beef cattle were sampled. Each group was slaughtered at a separate, single facility. Only AMR data provided from carcass samples (sponge sample area = 100 cm^2) is included here. Non-Feedlot Feedlot Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 52 19 None None None None None
13631 13631 10359 None 7758 10.4315/0362-028X-65.11.1694 Beach_2002_JoofFoPr Serotyping and antibiotic resistance profiling of Salmonella in feedlot and nonfeedlot beef cattle United States of America Observational 11060 11060 Production Type 100 feedlot and 96 non-feedlot adult beef cattle were sampled. Each group was slaughtered at a separate, single facility. Only AMR data provided from carcass samples (sponge sample area = 100 cm^2) is included here. Non-Feedlot Feedlot Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 52 19 None None None None None
13632 13632 10359 None 7758 10.4315/0362-028X-65.11.1694 Beach_2002_JoofFoPr Serotyping and antibiotic resistance profiling of Salmonella in feedlot and nonfeedlot beef cattle United States of America Observational 11060 11060 Production Type 100 feedlot and 96 non-feedlot adult beef cattle were sampled. Each group was slaughtered at a separate, single facility. Only AMR data provided from carcass samples (sponge sample area = 100 cm^2) is included here. Non-Feedlot Feedlot Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 52 19 None None None None None
13633 13633 10359 None 7758 10.4315/0362-028X-65.11.1694 Beach_2002_JoofFoPr Serotyping and antibiotic resistance profiling of Salmonella in feedlot and nonfeedlot beef cattle United States of America Observational 11060 11060 Production Type 100 feedlot and 96 non-feedlot adult beef cattle were sampled. Each group was slaughtered at a separate, single facility. Only AMR data provided from carcass samples (sponge sample area = 100 cm^2) is included here. Non-Feedlot Feedlot Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 52 19 None None None None None
13634 13634 10359 None 7758 10.4315/0362-028X-65.11.1694 Beach_2002_JoofFoPr Serotyping and antibiotic resistance profiling of Salmonella in feedlot and nonfeedlot beef cattle United States of America Observational 11060 11060 Production Type 100 feedlot and 96 non-feedlot adult beef cattle were sampled. Each group was slaughtered at a separate, single facility. Only AMR data provided from carcass samples (sponge sample area = 100 cm^2) is included here. Non-Feedlot Feedlot Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 52 19 None None None None None
13635 13635 10359 None 7758 10.4315/0362-028X-65.11.1694 Beach_2002_JoofFoPr Serotyping and antibiotic resistance profiling of Salmonella in feedlot and nonfeedlot beef cattle United States of America Observational 11060 11060 Production Type 100 feedlot and 96 non-feedlot adult beef cattle were sampled. Each group was slaughtered at a separate, single facility. Only AMR data provided from carcass samples (sponge sample area = 100 cm^2) is included here. Non-Feedlot Feedlot Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 3 None 7 None None None None None 52 19 None None None None None
13636 13636 10359 None 7758 10.4315/0362-028X-65.11.1694 Beach_2002_JoofFoPr Serotyping and antibiotic resistance profiling of Salmonella in feedlot and nonfeedlot beef cattle United States of America Observational 11060 11060 Production Type 100 feedlot and 96 non-feedlot adult beef cattle were sampled. Each group was slaughtered at a separate, single facility. Only AMR data provided from carcass samples (sponge sample area = 100 cm^2) is included here. Non-Feedlot Feedlot Cattle Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 52 19 None None None None None
13637 13637 10136 None 14656 10.1371/journal.pone.0172150 Yun2017 The effects of amoxicillin treatment of newborn piglets on the prevalence of hernias and abscesses, growth and ampicillin resistance of intestinal coliform bacteria in weaned pigs Finland Experimental 10386 10386 Amoxicillin Use Treatment group (ANT) was injected with 75 mg of amoxicillin on first day of life. Control group (CON) was not. Isolates cultured on non-selective agar plates. Amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 34.60 None 33.30 None 26 33 None None None None None
13638 13638 10136 None 14656 10.1371/journal.pone.0172150 Yun2017 The effects of amoxicillin treatment of newborn piglets on the prevalence of hernias and abscesses, growth and ampicillin resistance of intestinal coliform bacteria in weaned pigs Finland Experimental 10386 10386 Amoxicillin Use Treatment group (ANT) was injected with 75 mg of amoxicillin on first day of life. Control group (CON) was not. Isolates cultured on non-selective agar plates. Amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.80 None 6.10 None 26 33 None None None None None
13639 13639 10136 None 14656 10.1371/journal.pone.0172150 Yun2017 The effects of amoxicillin treatment of newborn piglets on the prevalence of hernias and abscesses, growth and ampicillin resistance of intestinal coliform bacteria in weaned pigs Finland Experimental 10386 10386 Amoxicillin Use Treatment group (ANT) was injected with 75 mg of amoxicillin on first day of life. Control group (CON) was not. Isolates cultured on non-selective agar plates. Amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 46.20 None 51.50 None 26 33 None None None None None
13640 13640 10136 None 14656 10.1371/journal.pone.0172150 Yun2017 The effects of amoxicillin treatment of newborn piglets on the prevalence of hernias and abscesses, growth and ampicillin resistance of intestinal coliform bacteria in weaned pigs Finland Experimental 10386 10386 Amoxicillin Use Treatment group (ANT) was injected with 75 mg of amoxicillin on first day of life. Control group (CON) was not. Isolates cultured on non-selective agar plates. Amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 53.80 None 51.50 None 26 33 None None None None None
13641 13641 10136 None 14656 10.1371/journal.pone.0172150 Yun2017 The effects of amoxicillin treatment of newborn piglets on the prevalence of hernias and abscesses, growth and ampicillin resistance of intestinal coliform bacteria in weaned pigs Finland Experimental 10386 10386 Amoxicillin Use Treatment group (ANT) was injected with 75 mg of amoxicillin on first day of life. Control group (CON) was not. Isolates cultured on non-selective agar plates. Amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 46.20 None 45.50 None 26 33 None None None None None
13642 13642 10136 None 14656 10.1371/journal.pone.0172150 Yun2017 The effects of amoxicillin treatment of newborn piglets on the prevalence of hernias and abscesses, growth and ampicillin resistance of intestinal coliform bacteria in weaned pigs Finland Experimental 10386 10386 Amoxicillin Use Treatment group (ANT) was injected with 75 mg of amoxicillin on first day of life. Control group (CON) was not. Isolates cultured on non-selective agar plates. Amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 46.20 None 45.50 None 26 33 None None None None None
13643 13643 10136 None 14656 10.1371/journal.pone.0172150 Yun2017 The effects of amoxicillin treatment of newborn piglets on the prevalence of hernias and abscesses, growth and ampicillin resistance of intestinal coliform bacteria in weaned pigs Finland Experimental 10386 10386 Amoxicillin Use Treatment group (ANT) was injected with 75 mg of amoxicillin on first day of life. Control group (CON) was not. Isolates cultured on non-selective agar plates. Amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 7.70 None 6.10 None 26 33 None None None None None
13644 13644 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10995 10995 Organic production USA Study comparing 2 organic and 2 conventional brands, and 33 organic and 43 conventional isolates Conventional producion Organic production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None None None None None 43 33 25.20 6.80 111.40 <0.01 None
13645 13645 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10997 10997 Organic production (2004) USA Study comparing 3 organic and 2 conventional brands, and 188 organic and 141 conventional isolates Conventional producion Organic production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Relative Risk Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None None None None None 141 188 7.80 2.40 25.50 <0.001 None
13646 13646 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10998 10998 Organic production (2006) USA Study comparing 3 organic and 2 conventional brands, and 188 organic and 141 conventional isolates Conventional producion Organic production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Relative Risk Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None None None None None 141 188 5.00 2.50 10.30 <0.001 None
13647 13647 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10996 10996 Organic production USA Study comparing 35 organic and 60 conventional farms, and 498 organic and 883 conventional isolates Conventional producion Organic production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None 883 498 2.02 1.29 3.18 0.002 None
13648 13648 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10996 10996 Organic production USA Study comparing 35 organic and 60 conventional farms, and 498 organic and 883 conventional isolates Conventional producion Organic production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None 883 498 2.71 1.39 5.30 0.003 None
13649 13649 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10996 10996 Organic production USA Study comparing 35 organic and 60 conventional farms, and 498 organic and 883 conventional isolates Conventional producion Organic production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None 883 498 1.52 1.07 2.15 0.018 None
13650 13650 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10996 10996 Organic production USA Study comparing 35 organic and 60 conventional farms, and 498 organic and 883 conventional isolates Conventional producion Organic production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None 883 498 1.63 1.14 2.34 0.008 None
13651 13651 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10996 10996 Organic production USA Study comparing 35 organic and 60 conventional farms, and 498 organic and 883 conventional isolates Conventional producion Organic production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None 883 498 2.38 1.29 4.42 0.006 None
13652 13652 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10994 10994 Organic production USA Study comparing 10 organic and 10 conventional farms, and 503 organic and 200 conventional isolates Conventional producion Organic production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None 200 503 3.95 1.90 8.20 <0.001 None
13653 13653 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10994 10994 Organic production USA Study comparing 10 organic and 10 conventional farms, and 503 organic and 200 conventional isolates Conventional producion Organic production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None 200 503 16.10 2.10 125.00 <0.001 None
13654 13654 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10994 10994 Organic production USA Study comparing 10 organic and 10 conventional farms, and 503 organic and 200 conventional isolates Conventional producion Organic production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None 200 503 2.84 1.32 6.14 <0.01 None
13655 13655 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10994 10994 Organic production USA Study comparing 10 organic and 10 conventional farms, and 503 organic and 200 conventional isolates Conventional producion Organic production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None 200 503 23.22 3.00 177.20 <0.001 None
13656 13656 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10994 10994 Organic production USA Study comparing 10 organic and 10 conventional farms, and 503 organic and 200 conventional isolates Conventional producion Organic production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None 200 503 10.92 5.40 21.90 <0.0001 None
13657 13657 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10994 10994 Organic production USA Study comparing 10 organic and 10 conventional farms, and 503 organic and 200 conventional isolates Conventional producion Organic production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None 200 503 4.30 2.39 7.84 <0.0001 None
13658 13658 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10994 10994 Organic production USA Study comparing 10 organic and 10 conventional farms, and 503 organic and 200 conventional isolates Conventional producion Organic production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None 200 503 9.66 2.79 33.37 <0.0001 None
13659 13659 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10994 10994 Organic production USA Study comparing 10 organic and 10 conventional farms, and 503 organic and 200 conventional isolates Conventional producion Organic production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None 200 503 56.10 3.40 940.50 <0.0001 None
13660 13660 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10994 10994 Organic production USA Study comparing 10 organic and 10 conventional farms, and 503 organic and 200 conventional isolates Conventional producion Organic production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None 200 503 40.80 2.41 688.90 <0.0001 None
13661 13661 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10994 10994 Organic production USA Study comparing 10 organic and 10 conventional farms, and 503 organic and 200 conventional isolates Conventional producion Organic production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None 200 503 2.85 1.59 5.10 <0.001 None
13662 13662 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10994 10994 Organic production USA Study comparing 10 organic and 10 conventional farms, and 503 organic and 200 conventional isolates Conventional producion Organic production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None 200 503 3.00 1.65 5.46 <0.001 None
13663 13663 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10994 10994 Organic production USA Study comparing 10 organic and 10 conventional farms, and 503 organic and 200 conventional isolates Conventional producion Organic production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None None None None None 200 503 25.40 7.54 85.60 <0.0001 None
13666 13666 10317 None 12147 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.07.010 Obeng_2012_VeteMicr Antibiotic resistance, phylogenetic grouping and virulence potential of Escherichia coli isolated from the faeces of intensively farmed and free range poultry Australia Observational 10941 10941 Free range production Phenotypic resistance in free range meat chickens compared to indoor commercial meat chickens. Free range production Indoor commercial production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 48 None 15 None None None None None 134 58 None None None None None
13667 13667 10317 None 12147 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.07.010 Obeng_2012_VeteMicr Antibiotic resistance, phylogenetic grouping and virulence potential of Escherichia coli isolated from the faeces of intensively farmed and free range poultry Australia Observational 10941 10941 Free range production Phenotypic resistance in free range meat chickens compared to indoor commercial meat chickens. Free range production Indoor commercial production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols florfenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 1 None None None None None 134 58 None None None None None
13668 13668 10317 None 12147 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.07.010 Obeng_2012_VeteMicr Antibiotic resistance, phylogenetic grouping and virulence potential of Escherichia coli isolated from the faeces of intensively farmed and free range poultry Australia Observational 10941 10941 Free range production Phenotypic resistance in free range meat chickens compared to indoor commercial meat chickens. Free range production Indoor commercial production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 10 None None None None None 134 58 None None None None None
13669 13669 10317 None 12147 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.07.010 Obeng_2012_VeteMicr Antibiotic resistance, phylogenetic grouping and virulence potential of Escherichia coli isolated from the faeces of intensively farmed and free range poultry Australia Observational 10941 10941 Free range production Phenotypic resistance in free range meat chickens compared to indoor commercial meat chickens. Free range production Indoor commercial production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 10 None None None None None 134 58 None None None None None
13670 13670 10317 None 12147 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.07.010 Obeng_2012_VeteMicr Antibiotic resistance, phylogenetic grouping and virulence potential of Escherichia coli isolated from the faeces of intensively farmed and free range poultry Australia Observational 10941 10941 Free range production Phenotypic resistance in free range meat chickens compared to indoor commercial meat chickens. Free range production Indoor commercial production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 10 None None None None None 134 58 None None None None None
13671 13671 10317 None 12147 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.07.010 Obeng_2012_VeteMicr Antibiotic resistance, phylogenetic grouping and virulence potential of Escherichia coli isolated from the faeces of intensively farmed and free range poultry Australia Observational 10941 10941 Free range production Phenotypic resistance in free range meat chickens compared to indoor commercial meat chickens. Free range production Indoor commercial production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 15 None None None None None 134 58 None None None None None
13672 13672 10317 None 12147 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.07.010 Obeng_2012_VeteMicr Antibiotic resistance, phylogenetic grouping and virulence potential of Escherichia coli isolated from the faeces of intensively farmed and free range poultry Australia Observational 10941 10941 Free range production Phenotypic resistance in free range meat chickens compared to indoor commercial meat chickens. Free range production Indoor commercial production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 53 None 39 None None None None None 134 58 None None None None None
13673 13673 10317 None 12147 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.07.010 Obeng_2012_VeteMicr Antibiotic resistance, phylogenetic grouping and virulence potential of Escherichia coli isolated from the faeces of intensively farmed and free range poultry Australia Observational 10941 10941 Free range production Phenotypic resistance in free range meat chickens compared to indoor commercial meat chickens. Free range production Indoor commercial production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 15 None None None None None 134 58 None None None None None
13674 13674 10358 None 7754 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03036.x Bauer.Garland_2006_JoofApMi Transmission of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium in poultry with and without antimicrobial selective pressure United States of America Experimental 11057 11057 Chlortetracycline Use 2/12 chicks in each of 4 pens were inoculated with MDR strain 8381r (10^9 CFU/mL per os). 2 pens received chlortetracycline at 120 ug/mL of water. Extracted info is # 8381r positive uninoculated chicks, and caecal samples were obtained from dead chicks. Chlortetracycline Use No Use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella None False None False 36 None 24 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
13675 13675 10358 None 7754 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03036.x Bauer.Garland_2006_JoofApMi Transmission of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium in poultry with and without antimicrobial selective pressure United States of America Experimental 11057 11057 Chlortetracycline Use 2/12 chicks in each of 4 pens were inoculated with MDR strain 8381r (10^9 CFU/mL per os). 2 pens received chlortetracycline at 120 ug/mL of water. Extracted info is # 8381r positive uninoculated chicks, and caecal samples were obtained from dead chicks. Chlortetracycline Use No Use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella None False None False 36 None 24 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
13676 13676 10358 None 7754 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03036.x Bauer.Garland_2006_JoofApMi Transmission of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium in poultry with and without antimicrobial selective pressure United States of America Experimental 11057 11057 Chlortetracycline Use 2/12 chicks in each of 4 pens were inoculated with MDR strain 8381r (10^9 CFU/mL per os). 2 pens received chlortetracycline at 120 ug/mL of water. Extracted info is # 8381r positive uninoculated chicks, and caecal samples were obtained from dead chicks. Chlortetracycline Use No Use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Salmonella None False None False 36 None 24 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
13677 13677 10358 None 7754 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03036.x Bauer.Garland_2006_JoofApMi Transmission of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium in poultry with and without antimicrobial selective pressure United States of America Experimental 11057 11057 Chlortetracycline Use 2/12 chicks in each of 4 pens were inoculated with MDR strain 8381r (10^9 CFU/mL per os). 2 pens received chlortetracycline at 120 ug/mL of water. Extracted info is # 8381r positive uninoculated chicks, and caecal samples were obtained from dead chicks. Chlortetracycline Use No Use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella None False None False 36 None 24 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
13678 13678 10358 None 7754 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03036.x Bauer.Garland_2006_JoofApMi Transmission of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium in poultry with and without antimicrobial selective pressure United States of America Experimental 11057 11057 Chlortetracycline Use 2/12 chicks in each of 4 pens were inoculated with MDR strain 8381r (10^9 CFU/mL per os). 2 pens received chlortetracycline at 120 ug/mL of water. Extracted info is # 8381r positive uninoculated chicks, and caecal samples were obtained from dead chicks. Chlortetracycline Use No Use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella None False None False 36 None 24 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
13679 13679 10358 None 7754 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03036.x Bauer.Garland_2006_JoofApMi Transmission of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium in poultry with and without antimicrobial selective pressure United States of America Experimental 11057 11057 Chlortetracycline Use 2/12 chicks in each of 4 pens were inoculated with MDR strain 8381r (10^9 CFU/mL per os). 2 pens received chlortetracycline at 120 ug/mL of water. Extracted info is # 8381r positive uninoculated chicks, and caecal samples were obtained from dead chicks. Chlortetracycline Use No Use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella None False None False 36 None 24 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
13680 13680 10358 None 7754 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03036.x Bauer.Garland_2006_JoofApMi Transmission of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium in poultry with and without antimicrobial selective pressure United States of America Experimental 11057 11057 Chlortetracycline Use 2/12 chicks in each of 4 pens were inoculated with MDR strain 8381r (10^9 CFU/mL per os). 2 pens received chlortetracycline at 120 ug/mL of water. Extracted info is # 8381r positive uninoculated chicks, and caecal samples were obtained from dead chicks. Chlortetracycline Use No Use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella None False None False 36 None 24 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
13681 13681 10358 None 7754 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03036.x Bauer.Garland_2006_JoofApMi Transmission of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium in poultry with and without antimicrobial selective pressure United States of America Experimental 11057 11057 Chlortetracycline Use 2/12 chicks in each of 4 pens were inoculated with MDR strain 8381r (10^9 CFU/mL per os). 2 pens received chlortetracycline at 120 ug/mL of water. Extracted info is # 8381r positive uninoculated chicks, and caecal samples were obtained from dead chicks. Chlortetracycline Use No Use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella None False None False 36 None 24 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
13682 13682 10358 None 7754 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03036.x Bauer.Garland_2006_JoofApMi Transmission of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium in poultry with and without antimicrobial selective pressure United States of America Experimental 11057 11057 Chlortetracycline Use 2/12 chicks in each of 4 pens were inoculated with MDR strain 8381r (10^9 CFU/mL per os). 2 pens received chlortetracycline at 120 ug/mL of water. Extracted info is # 8381r positive uninoculated chicks, and caecal samples were obtained from dead chicks. Chlortetracycline Use No Use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella None False None False 36 None 24 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
13683 13683 10358 None 7754 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03036.x Bauer.Garland_2006_JoofApMi Transmission of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium in poultry with and without antimicrobial selective pressure United States of America Experimental 11057 11057 Chlortetracycline Use 2/12 chicks in each of 4 pens were inoculated with MDR strain 8381r (10^9 CFU/mL per os). 2 pens received chlortetracycline at 120 ug/mL of water. Extracted info is # 8381r positive uninoculated chicks, and caecal samples were obtained from dead chicks. Chlortetracycline Use No Use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella None False None False 36 None 24 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
13684 13684 10358 None 7754 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03036.x Bauer.Garland_2006_JoofApMi Transmission of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium in poultry with and without antimicrobial selective pressure United States of America Experimental 11057 11057 Chlortetracycline Use 2/12 chicks in each of 4 pens were inoculated with MDR strain 8381r (10^9 CFU/mL per os). 2 pens received chlortetracycline at 120 ug/mL of water. Extracted info is # 8381r positive uninoculated chicks, and caecal samples were obtained from dead chicks. Chlortetracycline Use No Use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella None False None False 36 None 24 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
13685 13685 10358 None 7754 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03036.x Bauer.Garland_2006_JoofApMi Transmission of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium in poultry with and without antimicrobial selective pressure United States of America Experimental 11059 11059 Chlortetracycline Use 2/12 chicks in each of 4 pens were inoculated with sensitive strain 8382s (10^9 CFU/mL per os). 2 pens received chlortetracycline at 120 ug/mL of water. Extracted info is from inoculated chicks only (caecal samples from dead chicks). Chlortetracycline Use No Use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella None False None False 3 None 1 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13686 13686 10358 None 7754 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03036.x Bauer.Garland_2006_JoofApMi Transmission of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium in poultry with and without antimicrobial selective pressure United States of America Experimental 11059 11059 Chlortetracycline Use 2/12 chicks in each of 4 pens were inoculated with sensitive strain 8382s (10^9 CFU/mL per os). 2 pens received chlortetracycline at 120 ug/mL of water. Extracted info is from inoculated chicks only (caecal samples from dead chicks). Chlortetracycline Use No Use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella None False None False 3 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13687 13687 10358 None 7754 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03036.x Bauer.Garland_2006_JoofApMi Transmission of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium in poultry with and without antimicrobial selective pressure United States of America Experimental 11059 11059 Chlortetracycline Use 2/12 chicks in each of 4 pens were inoculated with sensitive strain 8382s (10^9 CFU/mL per os). 2 pens received chlortetracycline at 120 ug/mL of water. Extracted info is from inoculated chicks only (caecal samples from dead chicks). Chlortetracycline Use No Use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella None False None False 3 None 2 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13688 13688 10358 None 7754 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03036.x Bauer.Garland_2006_JoofApMi Transmission of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium in poultry with and without antimicrobial selective pressure United States of America Experimental 11059 11059 Chlortetracycline Use 2/12 chicks in each of 4 pens were inoculated with sensitive strain 8382s (10^9 CFU/mL per os). 2 pens received chlortetracycline at 120 ug/mL of water. Extracted info is from inoculated chicks only (caecal samples from dead chicks). Chlortetracycline Use No Use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella None False None False 3 None 1 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13689 13689 10358 None 7754 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03036.x Bauer.Garland_2006_JoofApMi Transmission of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium in poultry with and without antimicrobial selective pressure United States of America Experimental 11059 11059 Chlortetracycline Use 2/12 chicks in each of 4 pens were inoculated with sensitive strain 8382s (10^9 CFU/mL per os). 2 pens received chlortetracycline at 120 ug/mL of water. Extracted info is from inoculated chicks only (caecal samples from dead chicks). Chlortetracycline Use No Use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella None False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13690 13690 10358 None 7754 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03036.x Bauer.Garland_2006_JoofApMi Transmission of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium in poultry with and without antimicrobial selective pressure United States of America Experimental 11057 11057 Chlortetracycline Use 2/12 chicks in each of 4 pens were inoculated with MDR strain 8381r (10^9 CFU/mL per os). 2 pens received chlortetracycline at 120 ug/mL of water. Extracted info is # 8381r positive uninoculated chicks, and caecal samples were obtained from dead chicks. Chlortetracycline Use No Use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella None False None False 36 None 24 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
13691 13691 10342 None 7233 10.2478/jvetres-2018-0071 Adiguzel_2018_JoofVeRe.P Phenotypic and genotypic examination of antimicrobial resistance in thermophilic Campylobacter species isolated from poultry in Turkey Turkey Observational 10999 10999 Production Type Organic vs Conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 2 79 None None None None None
13692 13692 10342 None 7233 10.2478/jvetres-2018-0071 Adiguzel_2018_JoofVeRe.P Phenotypic and genotypic examination of antimicrobial resistance in thermophilic Campylobacter species isolated from poultry in Turkey Turkey Observational 10999 10999 Production Type Organic vs Conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 1 None 79 None None None None None 2 79 None None None None None
13693 13693 10342 None 7233 10.2478/jvetres-2018-0071 Adiguzel_2018_JoofVeRe.P Phenotypic and genotypic examination of antimicrobial resistance in thermophilic Campylobacter species isolated from poultry in Turkey Turkey Observational 10999 10999 Production Type Organic vs Conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 51 None None None None None 2 79 None None None None None
13694 13694 10342 None 7233 10.2478/jvetres-2018-0071 Adiguzel_2018_JoofVeRe.P Phenotypic and genotypic examination of antimicrobial resistance in thermophilic Campylobacter species isolated from poultry in Turkey Turkey Observational 10999 10999 Production Type Organic vs Conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 2 79 None None None None None
13695 13695 10342 None 7233 10.2478/jvetres-2018-0071 Adiguzel_2018_JoofVeRe.P Phenotypic and genotypic examination of antimicrobial resistance in thermophilic Campylobacter species isolated from poultry in Turkey Turkey Observational 10999 10999 Production Type Organic vs Conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 2 79 None None None None None
13696 13696 10342 None 7233 10.2478/jvetres-2018-0071 Adiguzel_2018_JoofVeRe.P Phenotypic and genotypic examination of antimicrobial resistance in thermophilic Campylobacter species isolated from poultry in Turkey Turkey Observational 10999 10999 Production Type Organic vs Conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 2 79 None None None None None
13697 13697 10343 None 7235 10.1128/JCM.01915-15 Adler_2015_JoofClMi Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Transmission Dynamics of Extended-Spectrum--Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae: a National Survey of Cattle Farms in Israel in 2013 None None 11000 11000 None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None False None False None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
13698 13698 10245 None 7652 10.3382/ps/pey486 Bailey_2019_PoulScie Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing United States of America Observational 10728 10728 Organic processing Both organic and conventional processing were antibiotic-free Organic processing Conventional processing Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides azithromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 1.50 None 3.40 None 136 176 None None None None None
13699 13699 10358 None 7754 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03036.x Bauer.Garland_2006_JoofApMi Transmission of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium in poultry with and without antimicrobial selective pressure United States of America Experimental 11058 11058 Chlortetracycline Use 2/12 chicks in each of 4 pens were inoculated with sensitive strain 8382s (10^9 CFU/mL per os). 2 pens received chlortetracycline at 120 ug/mL of water. Extracted info is # 8382s positive uninoculated chicks (caecal samples obtained from dead chicks). Chlortetracycline Use No Use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella None False None False 38 None 36 None None None None None 40 40 None None None None None
13700 13700 10245 None 7652 10.3382/ps/pey486 Bailey_2019_PoulScie Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing United States of America Observational 10728 10728 Organic processing Both organic and conventional processing were antibiotic-free Organic processing Conventional processing Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 3.70 None 8.00 None 136 176 None None None None None
13701 13701 10245 None 7652 10.3382/ps/pey486 Bailey_2019_PoulScie Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing United States of America Observational 10728 10728 Organic processing Both organic and conventional processing were antibiotic-free Organic processing Conventional processing Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Lincosamides clindamycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 5.90 None 7.40 None 136 176 None None None None None
13702 13702 10245 None 7652 10.3382/ps/pey486 Bailey_2019_PoulScie Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing United States of America Observational 10728 10728 Organic processing Both organic and conventional processing were antibiotic-free Organic processing Conventional processing Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 1.50 None 2.80 None 136 176 None None None None None
13703 13703 10245 None 7652 10.3382/ps/pey486 Bailey_2019_PoulScie Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing United States of America Observational 10728 10728 Organic processing Both organic and conventional processing were antibiotic-free Organic processing Conventional processing Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols florfenicol None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 1.50 None 1.70 None 136 176 None None None None None
13704 13704 10245 None 7652 10.3382/ps/pey486 Bailey_2019_PoulScie Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing United States of America Observational 10728 10728 Organic processing Both organic and conventional processing were antibiotic-free Organic processing Conventional processing Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 1.50 None 0.00 None 136 176 None None None None None
13705 13705 10245 None 7652 10.3382/ps/pey486 Bailey_2019_PoulScie Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing United States of America Observational 10728 10728 Organic processing Both organic and conventional processing were antibiotic-free Organic processing Conventional processing Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 5.90 None 8.50 None 136 176 None None None None None
13706 13706 10245 None 7652 10.3382/ps/pey486 Bailey_2019_PoulScie Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing United States of America Observational 10728 10728 Organic processing Both organic and conventional processing were antibiotic-free Organic processing Conventional processing Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides telithromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 2.90 None 2.30 None 136 176 None None None None None
13707 13707 10245 None 7652 10.3382/ps/pey486 Bailey_2019_PoulScie Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing United States of America Observational 10728 10728 Organic processing Both organic and conventional processing were antibiotic-free Organic processing Conventional processing Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 81.60 None 65.30 None 136 176 None None None None None
13708 13708 10219 None 7185 10.3382/ps.0620030 Abou.Youssef_1983_Poulscie The influence of a feed additive level of virginiamycin on the course of an experimentally induced Salmonella typhimurium infection in broilers United States of America Experimental 10644 10644 Virginiamycin use Test group received virginiamycin medicated feed at 25 g/ton. Measurements taken 56 post-infection with Salmonella typhimurium. Virginiamycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
13709 13709 10219 None 7185 10.3382/ps.0620030 Abou.Youssef_1983_Poulscie The influence of a feed additive level of virginiamycin on the course of an experimentally induced Salmonella typhimurium infection in broilers United States of America Experimental 10644 10644 Virginiamycin use Test group received virginiamycin medicated feed at 25 g/ton. Measurements taken 56 post-infection with Salmonella typhimurium. Virginiamycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
13710 13710 10219 None 7185 10.3382/ps.0620030 Abou.Youssef_1983_Poulscie The influence of a feed additive level of virginiamycin on the course of an experimentally induced Salmonella typhimurium infection in broilers United States of America Experimental 10644 10644 Virginiamycin use Test group received virginiamycin medicated feed at 25 g/ton. Measurements taken 56 post-infection with Salmonella typhimurium. Virginiamycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
13711 13711 10219 None 7185 10.3382/ps.0620030 Abou.Youssef_1983_Poulscie The influence of a feed additive level of virginiamycin on the course of an experimentally induced Salmonella typhimurium infection in broilers United States of America Experimental 10644 10644 Virginiamycin use Test group received virginiamycin medicated feed at 25 g/ton. Measurements taken 56 post-infection with Salmonella typhimurium. Virginiamycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Aminoglycosides neomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
13712 13712 10219 None 7185 10.3382/ps.0620030 Abou.Youssef_1983_Poulscie The influence of a feed additive level of virginiamycin on the course of an experimentally induced Salmonella typhimurium infection in broilers United States of America Experimental 10644 10644 Virginiamycin use Test group received virginiamycin medicated feed at 25 g/ton. Measurements taken 56 post-infection with Salmonella typhimurium. Virginiamycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Polymyxins polymyxin B None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
13713 13713 10219 None 7185 10.3382/ps.0620030 Abou.Youssef_1983_Poulscie The influence of a feed additive level of virginiamycin on the course of an experimentally induced Salmonella typhimurium infection in broilers United States of America Experimental 10644 10644 Virginiamycin use Test group received virginiamycin medicated feed at 25 g/ton. Measurements taken 56 post-infection with Salmonella typhimurium. Virginiamycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
13714 13714 10219 None 7185 10.3382/ps.0620030 Abou.Youssef_1983_Poulscie The influence of a feed additive level of virginiamycin on the course of an experimentally induced Salmonella typhimurium infection in broilers United States of America Experimental 10644 10644 Virginiamycin use Test group received virginiamycin medicated feed at 25 g/ton. Measurements taken 56 post-infection with Salmonella typhimurium. Virginiamycin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Combinations of antibacterials penicillins, combinations with other antibacterials None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 18 18 None None None None None
13716 13716 10345 None 7405 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1993.tb02754.x AlSam_1993_JoofApBa Effects of low concentrations of ampicillin in feed on the intestinal Escherichia coli of chicks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 11003 11003 Ampicillin use 1.7 g/ton in feed vs 0 Ampicillin use No use Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 28 None 20 None None None None None 72 72 None None None None None
13717 13717 10345 None 7405 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1993.tb02754.x AlSam_1993_JoofApBa Effects of low concentrations of ampicillin in feed on the intestinal Escherichia coli of chicks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 11004 11004 Ampicillin use 5 g/ton in feed vs 0 Ampicillin use No use Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 77 None 20 None None None None None 72 72 None None None None None
13718 13718 10345 None 7405 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1993.tb02754.x AlSam_1993_JoofApBa Effects of low concentrations of ampicillin in feed on the intestinal Escherichia coli of chicks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 11005 11005 Ampicillin use 5 g/ton in feed vs 1.7 g/ton Ampicillin use No use Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 77 None 28 None None None None None 72 72 None None None None None
13719 13719 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11018 11018 Production type Organic vs conventional battery cages Organic Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13720 13720 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11020 11020 Production type Organic vs conventional battery cages; ampicillin + sulbactam Organic Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13721 13721 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11019 11019 Production type Organic vs conventional battery cages; ampicillin + clavulanic acid Organic Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 18 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13722 13722 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11021 11021 Production type Organic vs conventional battery cages; piperacillin + tazobactam Organic Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins piperacillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13723 13723 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11018 11018 Production type Organic vs conventional battery cages Organic Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 17 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13726 13726 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11018 11018 Production type Organic vs conventional battery cages Organic Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13727 13727 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11018 11018 Production type Organic vs conventional battery cages Organic Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13728 13728 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11018 11018 Production type Organic vs conventional battery cages Organic Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13729 13729 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11018 11018 Production type Organic vs conventional battery cages Organic Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 19 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13730 13730 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11018 11018 Production type Organic vs conventional battery cages Organic Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13731 13731 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11018 11018 Production type Organic vs conventional battery cages Organic Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 10 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13732 13732 10349 None 7501 10.1371/journal.pone.0168983 Aperce_2016_PLoONE Effects of menthol supplementation in feedlot cattle diets on the fecal prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 11033 11033 Menthol Diet Supplementation Crushed menthol (99.7% purity) was included at 0.3% on a dry matter basis in a basal diet, fed ad libitum. Steers received 300 mg of monensin and 90 mg of tylosin per animal daily. Data extracted is from Day 30 (the final day). Menthol (0.3%) No Menthol Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 13 13 None None None None None
13733 13733 10349 None 7501 10.1371/journal.pone.0168983 Aperce_2016_PLoONE Effects of menthol supplementation in feedlot cattle diets on the fecal prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 11033 11033 Menthol Diet Supplementation Crushed menthol (99.7% purity) was included at 0.3% on a dry matter basis in a basal diet, fed ad libitum. Steers received 300 mg of monensin and 90 mg of tylosin per animal daily. Data extracted is from Day 30 (the final day). Menthol (0.3%) No Menthol Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 0 None None None None None 13 13 None None None None None
13734 13734 10349 None 7501 10.1371/journal.pone.0168983 Aperce_2016_PLoONE Effects of menthol supplementation in feedlot cattle diets on the fecal prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 11033 11033 Menthol Diet Supplementation Crushed menthol (99.7% purity) was included at 0.3% on a dry matter basis in a basal diet, fed ad libitum. Steers received 300 mg of monensin and 90 mg of tylosin per animal daily. Data extracted is from Day 30 (the final day). Menthol (0.3%) No Menthol Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides azithromycin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 13 13 None None None None None
13735 13735 10349 None 7501 10.1371/journal.pone.0168983 Aperce_2016_PLoONE Effects of menthol supplementation in feedlot cattle diets on the fecal prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 11033 11033 Menthol Diet Supplementation Crushed menthol (99.7% purity) was included at 0.3% on a dry matter basis in a basal diet, fed ad libitum. Steers received 300 mg of monensin and 90 mg of tylosin per animal daily. Data extracted is from Day 30 (the final day). Menthol (0.3%) No Menthol Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 13 13 None None None None None
13736 13736 10349 None 7501 10.1371/journal.pone.0168983 Aperce_2016_PLoONE Effects of menthol supplementation in feedlot cattle diets on the fecal prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 11033 11033 Menthol Diet Supplementation Crushed menthol (99.7% purity) was included at 0.3% on a dry matter basis in a basal diet, fed ad libitum. Steers received 300 mg of monensin and 90 mg of tylosin per animal daily. Data extracted is from Day 30 (the final day). Menthol (0.3%) No Menthol Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 13 13 None None None None None
13737 13737 10349 None 7501 10.1371/journal.pone.0168983 Aperce_2016_PLoONE Effects of menthol supplementation in feedlot cattle diets on the fecal prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 11033 11033 Menthol Diet Supplementation Crushed menthol (99.7% purity) was included at 0.3% on a dry matter basis in a basal diet, fed ad libitum. Steers received 300 mg of monensin and 90 mg of tylosin per animal daily. Data extracted is from Day 30 (the final day). Menthol (0.3%) No Menthol Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 13 13 None None None None None
13738 13738 10349 None 7501 10.1371/journal.pone.0168983 Aperce_2016_PLoONE Effects of menthol supplementation in feedlot cattle diets on the fecal prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 11033 11033 Menthol Diet Supplementation Crushed menthol (99.7% purity) was included at 0.3% on a dry matter basis in a basal diet, fed ad libitum. Steers received 300 mg of monensin and 90 mg of tylosin per animal daily. Data extracted is from Day 30 (the final day). Menthol (0.3%) No Menthol Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 13 13 None None None None None
13739 13739 10349 None 7501 10.1371/journal.pone.0168983 Aperce_2016_PLoONE Effects of menthol supplementation in feedlot cattle diets on the fecal prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 11033 11033 Menthol Diet Supplementation Crushed menthol (99.7% purity) was included at 0.3% on a dry matter basis in a basal diet, fed ad libitum. Steers received 300 mg of monensin and 90 mg of tylosin per animal daily. Data extracted is from Day 30 (the final day). Menthol (0.3%) No Menthol Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 13 13 None None None None None
13740 13740 10349 None 7501 10.1371/journal.pone.0168983 Aperce_2016_PLoONE Effects of menthol supplementation in feedlot cattle diets on the fecal prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 11033 11033 Menthol Diet Supplementation Crushed menthol (99.7% purity) was included at 0.3% on a dry matter basis in a basal diet, fed ad libitum. Steers received 300 mg of monensin and 90 mg of tylosin per animal daily. Data extracted is from Day 30 (the final day). Menthol (0.3%) No Menthol Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 13 13 None None None None None
13741 13741 10349 None 7501 10.1371/journal.pone.0168983 Aperce_2016_PLoONE Effects of menthol supplementation in feedlot cattle diets on the fecal prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 11033 11033 Menthol Diet Supplementation Crushed menthol (99.7% purity) was included at 0.3% on a dry matter basis in a basal diet, fed ad libitum. Steers received 300 mg of monensin and 90 mg of tylosin per animal daily. Data extracted is from Day 30 (the final day). Menthol (0.3%) No Menthol Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 13 13 None None None None None
13742 13742 10349 None 7501 10.1371/journal.pone.0168983 Aperce_2016_PLoONE Effects of menthol supplementation in feedlot cattle diets on the fecal prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 11033 11033 Menthol Diet Supplementation Crushed menthol (99.7% purity) was included at 0.3% on a dry matter basis in a basal diet, fed ad libitum. Steers received 300 mg of monensin and 90 mg of tylosin per animal daily. Data extracted is from Day 30 (the final day). Menthol (0.3%) No Menthol Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 13 13 None None None None None
13743 13743 10349 None 7501 10.1371/journal.pone.0168983 Aperce_2016_PLoONE Effects of menthol supplementation in feedlot cattle diets on the fecal prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 11033 11033 Menthol Diet Supplementation Crushed menthol (99.7% purity) was included at 0.3% on a dry matter basis in a basal diet, fed ad libitum. Steers received 300 mg of monensin and 90 mg of tylosin per animal daily. Data extracted is from Day 30 (the final day). Menthol (0.3%) No Menthol Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 13 13 None None None None None
13744 13744 10349 None 7501 10.1371/journal.pone.0168983 Aperce_2016_PLoONE Effects of menthol supplementation in feedlot cattle diets on the fecal prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 11033 11033 Menthol Diet Supplementation Crushed menthol (99.7% purity) was included at 0.3% on a dry matter basis in a basal diet, fed ad libitum. Steers received 300 mg of monensin and 90 mg of tylosin per animal daily. Data extracted is from Day 30 (the final day). Menthol (0.3%) No Menthol Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 13 13 None None None None None
13745 13745 10349 None 7501 10.1371/journal.pone.0168983 Aperce_2016_PLoONE Effects of menthol supplementation in feedlot cattle diets on the fecal prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 11033 11033 Menthol Diet Supplementation Crushed menthol (99.7% purity) was included at 0.3% on a dry matter basis in a basal diet, fed ad libitum. Steers received 300 mg of monensin and 90 mg of tylosin per animal daily. Data extracted is from Day 30 (the final day). Menthol (0.3%) No Menthol Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 13 None None None None None 13 13 None None None None None
13746 13746 10349 None 7501 10.1371/journal.pone.0168983 Aperce_2016_PLoONE Effects of menthol supplementation in feedlot cattle diets on the fecal prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 11033 11033 Menthol Diet Supplementation Crushed menthol (99.7% purity) was included at 0.3% on a dry matter basis in a basal diet, fed ad libitum. Steers received 300 mg of monensin and 90 mg of tylosin per animal daily. Data extracted is from Day 30 (the final day). Menthol (0.3%) No Menthol Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 10 None 3 None None None None None 13 13 None None None None None
13747 13747 10349 None 7501 10.1371/journal.pone.0168983 Aperce_2016_PLoONE Effects of menthol supplementation in feedlot cattle diets on the fecal prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 11032 11032 Menthol Diet Supplementation Crushed menthol (0.3% dry matter) in a basal diet was fed ad libitum. Steers received 300 mg monensin, 90 mg tylosin per animal daily. Data extracted is from Day 30, and the total # of isolates represents the total # resistant to tetracycline (Table 1). Menthol (0.3%) No Menthol Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tet(A) Gene tet(A) Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 10 3 None None None None None
13748 13748 10349 None 7501 10.1371/journal.pone.0168983 Aperce_2016_PLoONE Effects of menthol supplementation in feedlot cattle diets on the fecal prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant Escherichia coli United States of America Experimental 11032 11032 Menthol Diet Supplementation Crushed menthol (0.3% dry matter) in a basal diet was fed ad libitum. Steers received 300 mg monensin, 90 mg tylosin per animal daily. Data extracted is from Day 30, and the total # of isolates represents the total # resistant to tetracycline (Table 1). Menthol (0.3%) No Menthol Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tet(B) Gene tet(B) Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 1 None None None None None 10 3 None None None None None
13749 13749 10254 None 8091 10.1289/EHP292 Brower_2017_EnviHealPers The prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in poultry chickens and variation according to farming practices in Punjab, India India Observational 10773 10773 Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters Self-reported through survey Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters No use as growth promoters Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.78 0.49 1.26 <0.05 None
13750 13750 10254 None 8091 10.1289/EHP292 Brower_2017_EnviHealPers The prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in poultry chickens and variation according to farming practices in Punjab, India India Observational 10772 10772 Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters Self-reported through survey Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.72 1.36 6.04 <0.05 None
13751 13751 10254 None 8091 10.1289/EHP292 Brower_2017_EnviHealPers The prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in poultry chickens and variation according to farming practices in Punjab, India India Observational 10772 10772 Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters Self-reported through survey Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.26 1.17 4.19 <0.05 None
13752 13752 10254 None 8091 10.1289/EHP292 Brower_2017_EnviHealPers The prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in poultry chickens and variation according to farming practices in Punjab, India India Observational 10772 10772 Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters Self-reported through survey Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.67 1.04 2.69 <0.05 None
13753 13753 10254 None 8091 10.1289/EHP292 Brower_2017_EnviHealPers The prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in poultry chickens and variation according to farming practices in Punjab, India India Observational 10772 10772 Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters Self-reported through survey Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.28 0.53 3.77 >0.05 None
13754 13754 10254 None 8091 10.1289/EHP292 Brower_2017_EnviHealPers The prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in poultry chickens and variation according to farming practices in Punjab, India India Observational 10772 10772 Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters Self-reported through survey Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefuroxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.89 0.79 5.48 >0.05 None
13755 13755 10254 None 8091 10.1289/EHP292 Brower_2017_EnviHealPers The prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in poultry chickens and variation according to farming practices in Punjab, India India Observational 10772 10772 Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters Self-reported through survey Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.15 0.69 1.95 >0.05 None
13756 13756 10254 None 8091 10.1289/EHP292 Brower_2017_EnviHealPers The prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in poultry chickens and variation according to farming practices in Punjab, India India Observational 10772 10772 Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters Self-reported through survey Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.94 1.67 5.46 <0.001 None
13757 13757 10254 None 8091 10.1289/EHP292 Brower_2017_EnviHealPers The prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in poultry chickens and variation according to farming practices in Punjab, India India Observational 10772 10772 Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters Self-reported through survey Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.10 0.56 2.04 >0.05 None
13758 13758 10254 None 8091 10.1289/EHP292 Brower_2017_EnviHealPers The prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in poultry chickens and variation according to farming practices in Punjab, India India Observational 10774 10774 Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters Self-reported through survey Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters No use Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.46 1.03 2.08 <0.05 None
13759 13759 10254 None 8091 10.1289/EHP292 Brower_2017_EnviHealPers The prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in poultry chickens and variation according to farming practices in Punjab, India India Observational 10774 10774 Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters Self-reported through survey Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters No use Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.92 0.56 1.51 >0.05 None
13760 13760 10254 None 8091 10.1289/EHP292 Brower_2017_EnviHealPers The prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in poultry chickens and variation according to farming practices in Punjab, India India Observational 10774 10774 Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters Self-reported through survey Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters No use Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.30 2.90 6.47 <0.001 None
13761 13761 10254 None 8091 10.1289/EHP292 Brower_2017_EnviHealPers The prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in poultry chickens and variation according to farming practices in Punjab, India India Observational 10774 10774 Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters Self-reported through survey Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters No use Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 6.64 4.22 10.76 <0.001 None
13762 13762 10254 None 8091 10.1289/EHP292 Brower_2017_EnviHealPers The prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in poultry chickens and variation according to farming practices in Punjab, India India Observational 10774 10774 Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters Self-reported through survey Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters No use Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.06 0.36 3.49 >0.05 None
13763 13763 10254 None 8091 10.1289/EHP292 Brower_2017_EnviHealPers The prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in poultry chickens and variation according to farming practices in Punjab, India India Observational 10774 10774 Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters Self-reported through survey Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters No use Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefuroxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.99 0.39 2.75 >0.05 None
13764 13764 10254 None 8091 10.1289/EHP292 Brower_2017_EnviHealPers The prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in poultry chickens and variation according to farming practices in Punjab, India India Observational 10774 10774 Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters Self-reported through survey Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters No use Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.28 1.50 8.19 <0.05 None
13765 13765 10254 None 8091 10.1289/EHP292 Brower_2017_EnviHealPers The prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in poultry chickens and variation according to farming practices in Punjab, India India Observational 10774 10774 Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters Self-reported through survey Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters No use Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.98 2.59 6.16 <0.001 None
13766 13766 10254 None 8091 10.1289/EHP292 Brower_2017_EnviHealPers The prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in poultry chickens and variation according to farming practices in Punjab, India India Observational 10774 10774 Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters Self-reported through survey Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters No use Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.88 0.62 1.24 >0.05 None
13767 13767 10254 None 8091 10.1289/EHP292 Brower_2017_EnviHealPers The prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli in poultry chickens and variation according to farming practices in Punjab, India India Observational 10774 10774 Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters Self-reported through survey Use of antimicrobials as growth promoters No use Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.63 1.16 2.30 <0.05 None
13768 13768 10263 None 8326 10.1002/jsfa.3141 Chander_2008_JoofthScofFoanAg Antibiotic use and the prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria on turkey farms United States of America Observational 10802 10802 Subtherapeutic antibiotic use Self-reported use of antibiotics as feed additives Antibiotic use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 93.00 None 7 15 None None None None None
13769 13769 10263 None 8326 10.1002/jsfa.3141 Chander_2008_JoofthScofFoanAg Antibiotic use and the prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria on turkey farms United States of America Observational 10802 10802 Subtherapeutic antibiotic use Self-reported use of antibiotics as feed additives Antibiotic use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tilmicosin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 93.00 None 7 15 None None None None None
13770 13770 10263 None 8326 10.1002/jsfa.3141 Chander_2008_JoofthScofFoanAg Antibiotic use and the prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria on turkey farms United States of America Observational 10802 10802 Subtherapeutic antibiotic use Self-reported use of antibiotics as feed additives Antibiotic use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines chlortetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 80.00 None 7 15 None None None None None
13771 13771 10263 None 8326 10.1002/jsfa.3141 Chander_2008_JoofthScofFoanAg Antibiotic use and the prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria on turkey farms United States of America Observational 10802 10802 Subtherapeutic antibiotic use Self-reported use of antibiotics as feed additives Antibiotic use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 80.00 None 7 15 None None None None None
13772 13772 10263 None 8326 10.1002/jsfa.3141 Chander_2008_JoofthScofFoanAg Antibiotic use and the prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria on turkey farms United States of America Observational 10802 10802 Subtherapeutic antibiotic use Self-reported use of antibiotics as feed additives Antibiotic use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials penicillins, combinations with other antibacterials None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 93.00 None 7 15 None None None None None
13773 13773 10263 None 8326 10.1002/jsfa.3141 Chander_2008_JoofthScofFoanAg Antibiotic use and the prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria on turkey farms United States of America Observational 10802 10802 Subtherapeutic antibiotic use Self-reported use of antibiotics as feed additives Antibiotic use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 71.00 None 33.00 None 7 15 None None None None None
13774 13774 10263 None 8326 10.1002/jsfa.3141 Chander_2008_JoofthScofFoanAg Antibiotic use and the prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria on turkey farms United States of America Observational 10802 10802 Subtherapeutic antibiotic use Self-reported use of antibiotics as feed additives Antibiotic use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols florfenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 14.00 None 47.00 None 7 15 None None None None None
13775 13775 10263 None 8326 10.1002/jsfa.3141 Chander_2008_JoofthScofFoanAg Antibiotic use and the prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria on turkey farms United States of America Observational 10802 10802 Subtherapeutic antibiotic use Self-reported use of antibiotics as feed additives Antibiotic use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 43.00 None 0.00 None 7 15 None None None None None
13776 13776 10263 None 8326 10.1002/jsfa.3141 Chander_2008_JoofthScofFoanAg Antibiotic use and the prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria on turkey farms United States of America Observational 10802 10802 Subtherapeutic antibiotic use Self-reported use of antibiotics as feed additives Antibiotic use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 57.00 None 0.00 None 7 15 None None None None None
13777 13777 10263 None 8326 10.1002/jsfa.3141 Chander_2008_JoofthScofFoanAg Antibiotic use and the prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria on turkey farms United States of America Observational 10802 10802 Subtherapeutic antibiotic use Self-reported use of antibiotics as feed additives Antibiotic use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Pleuromutilins tiamulin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 93.00 None 7 15 None None None None None
13778 13778 10263 None 8326 10.1002/jsfa.3141 Chander_2008_JoofthScofFoanAg Antibiotic use and the prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria on turkey farms United States of America Observational 10802 10802 Subtherapeutic antibiotic use Self-reported use of antibiotics as feed additives Antibiotic use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Lincosamides clindamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 93.00 None 7 15 None None None None None
13779 13779 10263 None 8326 10.1002/jsfa.3141 Chander_2008_JoofthScofFoanAg Antibiotic use and the prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria on turkey farms United States of America Observational 10802 10802 Subtherapeutic antibiotic use Self-reported use of antibiotics as feed additives Antibiotic use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides, plain and in combinations sulfadimethoxine None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 0.00 None 7 15 None None None None None
13780 13780 10263 None 8326 10.1002/jsfa.3141 Chander_2008_JoofthScofFoanAg Antibiotic use and the prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria on turkey farms United States of America Observational 10802 10802 Subtherapeutic antibiotic use Self-reported use of antibiotics as feed additives Antibiotic use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfathiazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 7.00 None 7 15 None None None None None
13781 13781 10263 None 8326 10.1002/jsfa.3141 Chander_2008_JoofthScofFoanAg Antibiotic use and the prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria on turkey farms United States of America Observational 10802 10802 Subtherapeutic antibiotic use Self-reported use of antibiotics as feed additives Antibiotic use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 71.00 None 0.00 None 7 15 None None None None None
13782 13782 10348 None 7431 10.1111/jam.12790 Amachawadi_2015_JoofApMi Effects of in-feed copper and tylosin supplementations on copper and antimicrobial resistance in faecal enterococci of feedlot cattle United States of America Experimental 11031 11031 Copper use 10 mg/kg vs 100 mg/kg; prevalence of tcrB, no tylosin Copper 100 mg/kg Copper 10 mg/kg Cattle Beef Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None None Enterococcus faecium False None False 7 48 4 53 None None None None 200 200 None None None None None
13784 13784 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11006 11006 Production type Barn vs conventional battery cages Barn Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13785 13785 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11008 11008 Production type Barn vs conventional battery cages; ampicillin + sulbactam Barn Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13786 13786 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11007 11007 Production type Barn vs conventional battery cages; ampicillin + clavulanic acid Barn Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 18 None 18 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13787 13787 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11009 11009 Production type Barn vs conventional battery cages; piperacillin-tazobactam Barn Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins piperacillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13788 13788 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11006 11006 Production type Barn vs conventional battery cages Barn Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13789 13789 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11006 11006 Production type Barn vs conventional battery cages Barn Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 10 None 17 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13790 13790 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11006 11006 Production type Barn vs conventional battery cages Barn Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13791 13791 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11006 11006 Production type Barn vs conventional battery cages Barn Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13792 13792 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11006 11006 Production type Barn vs conventional battery cages Barn Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13793 13793 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11006 11006 Production type Barn vs conventional battery cages Barn Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 18 None 19 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13794 13794 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11006 11006 Production type Barn vs conventional battery cages Barn Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 3 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13795 13795 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11006 11006 Production type Barn vs conventional battery cages Barn Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13796 13796 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11014 11014 Production type Free-range vs conventional battery cages Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13797 13797 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11016 11016 Production type Free-range vs conventional battery cages; ampicillin + sulbactam Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13798 13798 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11015 11015 Production type Free-range vs conventional battery cages; ampicillin + clavulanic acid Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 7 None 18 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13799 13799 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11017 11017 Production type Free-range vs conventional battery cages; piperacillin + tazobactam Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins piperacillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13800 13800 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11014 11014 Production type Free-range vs conventional battery cages Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13801 13801 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11014 11014 Production type Free-range vs conventional battery cages Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 17 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13802 13802 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11014 11014 Production type Free-range vs conventional battery cages Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13803 13803 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11014 11014 Production type Free-range vs conventional battery cages Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13804 13804 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11014 11014 Production type Free-range vs conventional battery cages Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13805 13805 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11014 11014 Production type Free-range vs conventional battery cages Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 14 None 19 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13806 13806 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11014 11014 Production type Free-range vs conventional battery cages Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 3 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13807 13807 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11014 11014 Production type Free-range vs conventional battery cages Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13808 13808 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11010 11010 Production type Domestic production vs conventional battery cages Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13809 13809 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11012 11012 Production type Domestic production vs conventional battery cages; ampicillin + sulbactam Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13810 13810 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11011 11011 Production type Domestic production vs conventional battery cages; ampicillin + clavulanic acid Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13811 13811 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11013 11013 Production type Domestic production vs conventional battery cages; piperacillin + tazobactam Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins piperacillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13812 13812 10316 None 12123 10.1089/fpd.2017.2404 Novoa.Rama_2018_FooPatandDis Prevalence, Persistence, and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. from Eggs and Laying Hens Housed in Five Commercial Housing Systems United States of America Observational 10938 10938 Housing system Housing system Enrichable cage Conventional cage Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 5 None 10 None None None None None 6 13 None None None None None
13813 13813 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11010 11010 Production type Domestic production vs conventional battery cages Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13814 13814 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11010 11010 Production type Domestic production vs conventional battery cages Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13815 13815 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11010 11010 Production type Domestic production vs conventional battery cages Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13816 13816 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11010 11010 Production type Domestic production vs conventional battery cages Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13817 13817 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11010 11010 Production type Domestic production vs conventional battery cages Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13818 13818 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11010 11010 Production type Domestic production vs conventional battery cages Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13819 13819 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11010 11010 Production type Domestic production vs conventional battery cages Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13820 13820 10316 None 12123 10.1089/fpd.2017.2404 Novoa.Rama_2018_FooPatandDis Prevalence, Persistence, and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. from Eggs and Laying Hens Housed in Five Commercial Housing Systems United States of America Observational 10939 10939 Housing system Housing system Enriched colony cage Conventional cage Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 14 None 10 None None None None None 19 13 None None None None None
13821 13821 10316 None 12123 10.1089/fpd.2017.2404 Novoa.Rama_2018_FooPatandDis Prevalence, Persistence, and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. from Eggs and Laying Hens Housed in Five Commercial Housing Systems United States of America Observational 10937 10937 Housing system Housing system Cage free Conventional cage Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 9 None 10 None None None None None 15 13 None None None None None
13822 13822 10346 None 7418 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-182 lvarez.Fernndez_2012_JoofFoPr Influence of housing systems on microbial load and antimicrobial resistance patterns of Escherichia coli isolates from eggs produced for human consumption Spain Observational 11010 11010 Production type Domestic production vs conventional battery cages Free-range Conventional Battery Cages Chicken Eggs None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None None
13823 13823 10316 None 12123 10.1089/fpd.2017.2404 Novoa.Rama_2018_FooPatandDis Prevalence, Persistence, and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. from Eggs and Laying Hens Housed in Five Commercial Housing Systems United States of America Observational 10940 10940 Housing system Housing system Free range Conventional cage Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 6 None 10 None None None None None 13 13 None None None None None
13825 13825 10314 None 11772 10.4315/0362-028X-71.12.2537 Miranda_2008_JoofFoPr Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from organic and conventional poultry meat Spain Observational 10932 10932 Production type Fresh, prepackaged, skin-on drumstick products certified by an official agency compared to conventional Organic production Conventional production Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 25.70 74.30 66.10 33.90 105 115 None None None <0.0001 None
13826 13826 10314 None 11772 10.4315/0362-028X-71.12.2537 Miranda_2008_JoofFoPr Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from organic and conventional poultry meat Spain Observational 10932 10932 Production type Fresh, prepackaged, skin-on drumstick products certified by an official agency compared to conventional Organic production Conventional production Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 7.70 92.40 53.10 47.00 105 115 None None None <0.0001 None
14498 14498 10080 None 12311 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.12.020 Ozaki2011 Antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli isolated from growing chickens on commercial broiler farms Japan Observational 10220 10220 Sulfadimethoxine Use Referent = Farms 1 & 2 (no AMU), Exposed = Farm 4 (500 ppm SDMX given starting at 20 days old, for 3 days, additional AMU for disease treatment). Days old at sampling: Farm 1 = 50 days, Farms 2 and 4 = 48 days. Sulfadimethoxine Use (Farm 4) No Use (Farms 1 & 2) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 72 None 121 None None None None None 100 200 None None None None 95.000
14499 14499 10080 None 12311 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.12.020 Ozaki2011 Antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli isolated from growing chickens on commercial broiler farms Japan Observational 10220 10220 Sulfadimethoxine Use Referent = Farms 1 & 2 (no AMU), Exposed = Farm 4 (500 ppm SDMX given starting at 20 days old, for 3 days, additional AMU for disease treatment). Days old at sampling: Farm 1 = 50 days, Farms 2 and 4 = 48 days. Sulfadimethoxine Use (Farm 4) No Use (Farms 1 & 2) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Escherichia None False None False 2 None 74 None None None None None 100 200 None None None None 95.000
14500 14500 10080 None 12311 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.12.020 Ozaki2011 Antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli isolated from growing chickens on commercial broiler farms Japan Observational 10220 10220 Sulfadimethoxine Use Referent = Farms 1 & 2 (no AMU), Exposed = Farm 4 (500 ppm SDMX given starting at 20 days old, for 3 days, additional AMU for disease treatment). Days old at sampling: Farm 1 = 50 days, Farms 2 and 4 = 48 days. Sulfadimethoxine Use (Farm 4) No Use (Farms 1 & 2) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia None False None False 2 None 70 None None None None None 100 200 None None None None 95.000
14501 14501 10080 None 12311 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.12.020 Ozaki2011 Antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli isolated from growing chickens on commercial broiler farms Japan Observational 10220 10220 Sulfadimethoxine Use Referent = Farms 1 & 2 (no AMU), Exposed = Farm 4 (500 ppm SDMX given starting at 20 days old, for 3 days, additional AMU for disease treatment). Days old at sampling: Farm 1 = 50 days, Farms 2 and 4 = 48 days. Sulfadimethoxine Use (Farm 4) No Use (Farms 1 & 2) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides dihydrostreptomycin None Escherichia None False None False 60 None 55 None None None None None 100 200 None None None None 95.000
14502 14502 10080 None 12311 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.12.020 Ozaki2011 Antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli isolated from growing chickens on commercial broiler farms Japan Observational 10220 10220 Sulfadimethoxine Use Referent = Farms 1 & 2 (no AMU), Exposed = Farm 4 (500 ppm SDMX given starting at 20 days old, for 3 days, additional AMU for disease treatment). Days old at sampling: Farm 1 = 50 days, Farms 2 and 4 = 48 days. Sulfadimethoxine Use (Farm 4) No Use (Farms 1 & 2) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia None False None False 20 None 12 None None None None None 100 200 None None None None 95.000
14503 14503 10080 None 12311 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.12.020 Ozaki2011 Antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli isolated from growing chickens on commercial broiler farms Japan Observational 10220 10220 Sulfadimethoxine Use Referent = Farms 1 & 2 (no AMU), Exposed = Farm 4 (500 ppm SDMX given starting at 20 days old, for 3 days, additional AMU for disease treatment). Days old at sampling: Farm 1 = 50 days, Farms 2 and 4 = 48 days. Sulfadimethoxine Use (Farm 4) No Use (Farms 1 & 2) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia None False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 100 200 None None None None 95.000
14504 14504 10080 None 12311 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.12.020 Ozaki2011 Antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli isolated from growing chickens on commercial broiler farms Japan Observational 10220 10220 Sulfadimethoxine Use Referent = Farms 1 & 2 (no AMU), Exposed = Farm 4 (500 ppm SDMX given starting at 20 days old, for 3 days, additional AMU for disease treatment). Days old at sampling: Farm 1 = 50 days, Farms 2 and 4 = 48 days. Sulfadimethoxine Use (Farm 4) No Use (Farms 1 & 2) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia None False None False 70 None 123 None None None None None 100 200 None None None None 95.000
14505 14505 10080 None 12311 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.12.020 Ozaki2011 Antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli isolated from growing chickens on commercial broiler farms Japan Observational 10220 10220 Sulfadimethoxine Use Referent = Farms 1 & 2 (no AMU), Exposed = Farm 4 (500 ppm SDMX given starting at 20 days old, for 3 days, additional AMU for disease treatment). Days old at sampling: Farm 1 = 50 days, Farms 2 and 4 = 48 days. Sulfadimethoxine Use (Farm 4) No Use (Farms 1 & 2) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia None False None False 34 None 18 None None None None None 100 200 None None None None 95.000
14506 14506 10080 None 12311 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.12.020 Ozaki2011 Antimicrobial resistance in fecal Escherichia coli isolated from growing chickens on commercial broiler farms Japan Observational 10220 10220 Sulfadimethoxine Use Referent = Farms 1 & 2 (no AMU), Exposed = Farm 4 (500 ppm SDMX given starting at 20 days old, for 3 days, additional AMU for disease treatment). Days old at sampling: Farm 1 = 50 days, Farms 2 and 4 = 48 days. Sulfadimethoxine Use (Farm 4) No Use (Farms 1 & 2) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia None False None False 12 None 32 None None None None None 100 200 None None None None 95.000
14507 14507 10253 None 8030 Boulianne_2016_CaJoofVeRe Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among escherichia coli and enterococcus spp. Isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada Canada Observational 10758 10758 Bacitracin Use Bacitracin use (feed additive). No AMU level provided. Bacitracin Use No Use Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Flock Other antibacterials bacitracin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 100.00 None 97.00 None 19 32 None None None None 95.000
14508 14508 10253 None 8030 Boulianne_2016_CaJoofVeRe Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among escherichia coli and enterococcus spp. Isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada Canada Observational 10762 10762 Gentamicin Use Gentamicin use (hatchery). No AMU level provided. Gentamicin Use No Use Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Flock Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 32.00 None 1 50 None None None None 95.000
14509 14509 10253 None 8030 Boulianne_2016_CaJoofVeRe Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among escherichia coli and enterococcus spp. Isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada Canada Observational 10770 10770 Virginiamycin Use Virginiamycin use (feed additive). No AMU level provided. Virginiamycin Use No Use Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Flock Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 23 21 None None None None 95.000
14510 14510 10253 None 8030 Boulianne_2016_CaJoofVeRe Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among escherichia coli and enterococcus spp. Isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada Canada Observational 10768 10768 Tylosin Use Tylosin use (feed additive). No AMU level provided. Tylosin Use No Use Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Flock Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 100.00 None 93.00 None 11 40 None None None None 95.000
14511 14511 10253 None 8030 Boulianne_2016_CaJoofVeRe Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among escherichia coli and enterococcus spp. Isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada Canada Observational 10760 10760 Ceftiofur Use Ceftiofur use (hatchery). No AMU level provided. Ceftiofur Use No Use Turkey Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Flock Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 50.00 None 34.00 None 4 35 None None None None 95.000
14512 14512 10253 None 8030 Boulianne_2016_CaJoofVeRe Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among escherichia coli and enterococcus spp. Isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada Canada Observational 10765 10765 Growth on used litter Growth on litter previously used by chickens. Grown on Used Litter Not Grown on Used Litter Turkey Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Flock Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 67.00 None 27.00 None 9 30 None None None None 95.000
14513 14513 10253 None 8030 Boulianne_2016_CaJoofVeRe Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among escherichia coli and enterococcus spp. Isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada Canada Observational 10763 10763 Gentamicin Use Gentamicin Use (hatchery). No AMU level provided. Gentamicin Use No Use Turkey Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Flock Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 54.00 None 65.00 None 13 26 None None None None 95.000
14514 14514 10253 None 8030 Boulianne_2016_CaJoofVeRe Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among escherichia coli and enterococcus spp. Isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada Canada Observational 10765 10765 Growth on used litter Growth on litter previously used by chickens. Grown on Used Litter Not Grown on Used Litter Turkey Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Flock Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 89.00 None 53.00 None 9 30 None None None None 95.000
14515 14515 10253 None 8030 Boulianne_2016_CaJoofVeRe Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among escherichia coli and enterococcus spp. Isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada Canada Observational 10767 10767 Tetracycline Use Tetracycline use (feed additive or treatment). No AMU level provided. Tetracycline Use No Use Turkey Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Flock Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 5 34 None None None None 95.000
14516 14516 10253 None 8030 Boulianne_2016_CaJoofVeRe Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among escherichia coli and enterococcus spp. Isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada Canada Observational 10759 10759 Bacitracin Use Bacitracin use (feed additive). No AMU level provided. Bacitracin Use No Use Turkey Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Flock Other antibacterials bacitracin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 100.00 None 92.00 None 13 26 None None None None 95.000
14517 14517 10253 None 8030 Boulianne_2016_CaJoofVeRe Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among escherichia coli and enterococcus spp. Isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada Canada Observational 10763 10763 Gentamicin Use Gentamicin Use (hatchery). No AMU level provided. Gentamicin Use No Use Turkey Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Flock Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 54.00 None 23.00 None 13 26 None None None None 95.000
14518 14518 10253 None 8030 Boulianne_2016_CaJoofVeRe Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among escherichia coli and enterococcus spp. Isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada Canada Observational 10771 10771 Virginiamycin Use Virginiamycin use (feed additive). No AMU level provided. Virginiamycin Use No Use Turkey Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Flock Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 94.00 None 100.00 None 18 16 None None None None 95.000
14519 14519 10253 None 8030 Boulianne_2016_CaJoofVeRe Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among escherichia coli and enterococcus spp. Isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada Canada Observational 10769 10769 Tylosin Use Tylosin use (feed additive). No AMU level provided. Tylosin Use No Use Turkey Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Flock Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 100.00 None 95.00 None 2 37 None None None None 95.000
14520 14520 10209 None 9908 10.1093/jac/dkh508 Hershberger2005 Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin United States of America Observational 10605 10605 Use of fluoroquinolones (enrofloxacin) Farmers reported usual use of antibiotics through questionnaire (amount not specified) Enrofloxacin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 3 31 None None None None 95.000
14521 14521 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11145 11145 Production Type Routine AMU at almost every single conventional farm, but no AMU (current or past) on any of the organic farms. Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 10 None 63 None None None None None 161 201 None None None None 95.000
14522 14522 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11145 11145 Production Type Routine AMU at almost every single conventional farm, but no AMU (current or past) on any of the organic farms. Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Combination False None False 81 None 186 None None None None None 161 201 None None None None 95.000
14523 14523 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11144 11144 Production Type Routine AMU at almost every single conventional farm, but no AMU (current or past) on any of the organic farms. Organic Conventional Turkey None None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter None False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 161 201 None None None None 95.000
14524 14524 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11144 11144 Production Type Routine AMU at almost every single conventional farm, but no AMU (current or past) on any of the organic farms. Organic Conventional Turkey None None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Campylobacter None False None False 50 None 153 None None None None None 161 201 None None None None 95.000
14525 14525 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11144 11144 Production Type Routine AMU at almost every single conventional farm, but no AMU (current or past) on any of the organic farms. Organic Conventional Turkey None None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Lincosamides clindamycin None Campylobacter None False None False 5 None 129 None None None None None 161 201 None None None None 95.000
14526 14526 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11144 11144 Production Type Routine AMU at almost every single conventional farm, but no AMU (current or past) on any of the organic farms. Organic Conventional Turkey None None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter None False None False 5 None 160 None None None None None 161 201 None None None None 95.000
14527 14527 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11144 11144 Production Type Routine AMU at almost every single conventional farm, but no AMU (current or past) on any of the organic farms. Organic Conventional Turkey None None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter None False None False 3 None 136 None None None None None 161 201 None None None None 95.000
14528 14528 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11144 11144 Production Type Routine AMU at almost every single conventional farm, but no AMU (current or past) on any of the organic farms. Organic Conventional Turkey None None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones norfloxacin None Campylobacter None False None False 3 None 134 None None None None None 161 201 None None None None 95.000
14529 14529 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11144 11144 Production Type Routine AMU at almost every single conventional farm, but no AMU (current or past) on any of the organic farms. Organic Conventional Turkey None None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter None False None False 3 None 135 None None None None None 161 201 None None None None 95.000
14531 14531 10269 None 8463 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.018 Chuppava_2018_VeteMicr Effects of different types of flooring design on the development of antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in fattening turkeys Germany Experimental 10807 10807 Before and After Enrofloxacin Use (cloacal swab) (BT vs ET) Before AMU vs 21 days after treatment with Baytril 10% (10 mg enrofloxacin/kg body weight per day), via drinking water for 5 days to birds aged 10-14. T1 & T2 data aggregated. End of Treatment (ET) Before Treatment (BT) Turkey Poults None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 103 None 0 None None None None None 192 48 None None None None 95.000
14532 14532 10269 None 8463 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.018 Chuppava_2018_VeteMicr Effects of different types of flooring design on the development of antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in fattening turkeys Germany Experimental 10807 10807 Before and After Enrofloxacin Use (cloacal swab) (BT vs ET) Before AMU vs 21 days after treatment with Baytril 10% (10 mg enrofloxacin/kg body weight per day), via drinking water for 5 days to birds aged 10-14. T1 & T2 data aggregated. End of Treatment (ET) Before Treatment (BT) Turkey Poults None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 36 None 24 None None None None None 192 48 None None None None 95.000
14533 14533 10269 None 8463 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.018 Chuppava_2018_VeteMicr Effects of different types of flooring design on the development of antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in fattening turkeys Germany Experimental 10808 10808 Before and After Enrofloxacin Use (poultry manure) (BT vs ET) Before AMU vs 21 days after treatment with Baytril 10% (10 mg enrofloxacin/kg body weight per day), via drinking water for 5 days to birds aged 10-14. T1 & T2 data aggregated. End of Treatment (ET) Before Treatment (BT) Turkey Poults None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 33 None 0 None None None None None 48 48 None None None None 95.000
14534 14534 10269 None 8463 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.018 Chuppava_2018_VeteMicr Effects of different types of flooring design on the development of antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in fattening turkeys Germany Experimental 10808 10808 Before and After Enrofloxacin Use (poultry manure) (BT vs ET) Before AMU vs 21 days after treatment with Baytril 10% (10 mg enrofloxacin/kg body weight per day), via drinking water for 5 days to birds aged 10-14. T1 & T2 data aggregated. End of Treatment (ET) Before Treatment (BT) Turkey Poults None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 23 None 20 None None None None None 48 48 None None None None 95.000
14535 14535 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10434 10434 Antimicrobial use: antimicrobials added to starter (weanling) feeds only No additional detail available Antimicrobials added to starter (weanling) feeds only No antimicrobials added Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.76 1.60 14.16 0.02 95.000
14536 14536 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10464 10464 Tetracycline (class) use: tetracyclines added to grower-finisher feeds No additional detail available Tetracyclines added to grower-finisher feeds No antimicrobials added to post-weaning rations Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.05 1.16 3.65 0.04 95.000
14537 14537 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10463 10463 Penicillin (class) use: penicillins added to nursing sow feeds No additional detail available Penicillins added to nursing sow feeds Penicillins not added to nursing sow feeds Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.77 1.24 6.19 0.04 95.000
14538 14538 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10446 10446 Carbadox use: carbadox added to starter (weanling) feeds No additional detail available Carbadox added to starter (weanling) feeds Carbadox not added to starter (weanling) feeds Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Quinolones carbadox None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.85 2.26 10.40 0.001 95.000
14539 14539 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10447 10447 Gentamicin use: individual treatments with gentamicin No additional detail available Individual treatments with gentamicin Gentamicin not used on farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 11.77 2.21 62.74 0.02 95.000
14540 14540 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10433 10433 Antimicrobial use: antimicrobials added to starter (weanling) feeds No additional detail available Antimicrobials added to starter (weanling) feeds No antimicrobials added to starter (weanling) feeds Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.56 1.64 7.75 0.004 95.000
14541 14541 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10432 10432 Antimicrobial use: antimicrobials added to grower-finisher rations No additional detail available Antimicrobials added to grower-finisher rations No antimicrobials added to grower-finisher rations Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.18 1.35 3.53 0.01 95.000
14542 14542 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10464 10464 Tetracycline (class) use: tetracyclines added to grower-finisher feeds No additional detail available Tetracyclines added to grower-finisher feeds No antimicrobials added to post-weaning rations Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.69 1.65 4.40 0.001 95.000
14543 14543 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10464 10464 Tetracycline (class) use: tetracyclines added to grower-finisher feeds No additional detail available Tetracyclines added to grower-finisher feeds No antimicrobials added to post-weaning rations Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.80 1.32 5.97 0.03 95.000
14544 14544 10162 None 8962 10.1016/s0167-5877(97)00095-0 Dunlop1998 Associations among antimicrobial drug treatments and antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli of swine on 34 farrow-to-finish farms in Ontario, Canada Canada Observational 10433 10433 Antimicrobial use: antimicrobials added to starter (weanling) feeds No additional detail available Antimicrobials added to starter (weanling) feeds No antimicrobials added to starter (weanling) feeds Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.84 1.52 5.29 0.01 95.000
14546 14546 10190 None 9370 10.1089/mdr.2006.12.210 Funk2006 The effect of subtherapeutic chlortetracycline on antimicrobial resistance in the fecal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10511 10511 Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use Treatment group received 50 g of chlortetracycline per ton (U.S.) of feed for the entire finisher period(~10 weeks of age until ~24 weeks of age). Control group did not. Other AMU administered to both groups (see text). Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Salmonella spp. False None False 14 None 1 None None None None None 14 1 None None None None 95.000
14547 14547 10190 None 9370 10.1089/mdr.2006.12.210 Funk2006 The effect of subtherapeutic chlortetracycline on antimicrobial resistance in the fecal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10511 10511 Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use Treatment group received 50 g of chlortetracycline per ton (U.S.) of feed for the entire finisher period(~10 weeks of age until ~24 weeks of age). Control group did not. Other AMU administered to both groups (see text). Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. False None False 14 None 1 None None None None None 14 1 None None None None 95.000
14548 14548 10190 None 9370 10.1089/mdr.2006.12.210 Funk2006 The effect of subtherapeutic chlortetracycline on antimicrobial resistance in the fecal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10511 10511 Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use Treatment group received 50 g of chlortetracycline per ton (U.S.) of feed for the entire finisher period(~10 weeks of age until ~24 weeks of age). Control group did not. Other AMU administered to both groups (see text). Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella spp. False None False 14 None 1 None None None None None 14 1 None None None None 95.000
14549 14549 10190 None 9370 10.1089/mdr.2006.12.210 Funk2006 The effect of subtherapeutic chlortetracycline on antimicrobial resistance in the fecal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10511 10511 Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use Treatment group received 50 g of chlortetracycline per ton (U.S.) of feed for the entire finisher period(~10 weeks of age until ~24 weeks of age). Control group did not. Other AMU administered to both groups (see text). Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False 14 None 1 None None None None None 14 1 None None None None 95.000
14550 14550 10190 None 9370 10.1089/mdr.2006.12.210 Funk2006 The effect of subtherapeutic chlortetracycline on antimicrobial resistance in the fecal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10511 10511 Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use Treatment group received 50 g of chlortetracycline per ton (U.S.) of feed for the entire finisher period(~10 weeks of age until ~24 weeks of age). Control group did not. Other AMU administered to both groups (see text). Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella None False None False 14 None 1 None None None None None 14 1 None None None None 95.000
14551 14551 10190 None 9370 10.1089/mdr.2006.12.210 Funk2006 The effect of subtherapeutic chlortetracycline on antimicrobial resistance in the fecal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10511 10511 Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use Treatment group received 50 g of chlortetracycline per ton (U.S.) of feed for the entire finisher period(~10 weeks of age until ~24 weeks of age). Control group did not. Other AMU administered to both groups (see text). Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Salmonella None False None False 14 None 1 None None None None None 14 1 None None None None 95.000
14552 14552 10190 None 9370 10.1089/mdr.2006.12.210 Funk2006 The effect of subtherapeutic chlortetracycline on antimicrobial resistance in the fecal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10511 10511 Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use Treatment group received 50 g of chlortetracycline per ton (U.S.) of feed for the entire finisher period(~10 weeks of age until ~24 weeks of age). Control group did not. Other AMU administered to both groups (see text). Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella None False None False 14 None 1 None None None None None 14 1 None None None None 95.000
14553 14553 10190 None 9370 10.1089/mdr.2006.12.210 Funk2006 The effect of subtherapeutic chlortetracycline on antimicrobial resistance in the fecal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10511 10511 Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use Treatment group received 50 g of chlortetracycline per ton (U.S.) of feed for the entire finisher period(~10 weeks of age until ~24 weeks of age). Control group did not. Other AMU administered to both groups (see text). Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 14 None 0 None None None None None 14 1 None None None None 95.000
14554 14554 10190 None 9370 10.1089/mdr.2006.12.210 Funk2006 The effect of subtherapeutic chlortetracycline on antimicrobial resistance in the fecal flora of swine United States of America Experimental 10511 10511 Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use Treatment group received 50 g of chlortetracycline per ton (U.S.) of feed for the entire finisher period(~10 weeks of age until ~24 weeks of age). Control group did not. Other AMU administered to both groups (see text). Subtherapeutic Chlortetracycline Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides apramycin None Salmonella None False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 14 1 None None None None 95.000
14555 14555 10056 None 11605 10.3390/ijerph120202150 Mazurek2015 Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from pigs during metaphylactic trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment and in the post-exposure period Poland Experimental 10149 10149 Duration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use P2 (7-wk-old cohort, sampled after 2 wks of AMU) P1 (6-wk-old cohort, sampled after 1 wk of AMU). Metaphylactic treatment: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as medicated fodder, 15–30 mg active substance/1 kg bw/day, to post-weaning piglets. Two Weeks (P2) One Week (P1) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column sul3 Escherichia coli False None False 23 None 23 None None None None None 72 59 None None None None 95.000
14556 14556 10056 None 11605 10.3390/ijerph120202150 Mazurek2015 Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from pigs during metaphylactic trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment and in the post-exposure period Poland Experimental 10151 10151 Duration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use P3 (8-wk-old cohort, sampled after 3 wks of AMU) P1 (6-wk-old cohort, sampled after 1 wk of AMU). Metaphylactic treatment: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as medicated fodder, 15–30 mg active substance/1 kg bw/day, to post-weaning piglets. Three Weeks (P3) One Week (P1) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column dfrA1 Escherichia coli False None False 49 None 47 None None None None None 82 59 None None None None 95.000
14557 14557 10056 None 11605 10.3390/ijerph120202150 Mazurek2015 Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from pigs during metaphylactic trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment and in the post-exposure period Poland Experimental 10151 10151 Duration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use P3 (8-wk-old cohort, sampled after 3 wks of AMU) P1 (6-wk-old cohort, sampled after 1 wk of AMU). Metaphylactic treatment: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as medicated fodder, 15–30 mg active substance/1 kg bw/day, to post-weaning piglets. Three Weeks (P3) One Week (P1) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column dfrA5 Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 3 None None None None None 82 59 None None None None 95.000
14558 14558 10056 None 11605 10.3390/ijerph120202150 Mazurek2015 Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from pigs during metaphylactic trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment and in the post-exposure period Poland Experimental 10151 10151 Duration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use P3 (8-wk-old cohort, sampled after 3 wks of AMU) P1 (6-wk-old cohort, sampled after 1 wk of AMU). Metaphylactic treatment: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as medicated fodder, 15–30 mg active substance/1 kg bw/day, to post-weaning piglets. Three Weeks (P3) One Week (P1) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column dfrA7 Escherichia coli False None False 14 None 4 None None None None None 82 59 None None None None 95.000
14559 14559 10056 None 11605 10.3390/ijerph120202150 Mazurek2015 Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from pigs during metaphylactic trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment and in the post-exposure period Poland Experimental 10151 10151 Duration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use P3 (8-wk-old cohort, sampled after 3 wks of AMU) P1 (6-wk-old cohort, sampled after 1 wk of AMU). Metaphylactic treatment: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as medicated fodder, 15–30 mg active substance/1 kg bw/day, to post-weaning piglets. Three Weeks (P3) One Week (P1) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column dfrA12 Escherichia coli False None False 22 None 27 None None None None None 82 59 None None None None 95.000
14560 14560 10056 None 11605 10.3390/ijerph120202150 Mazurek2015 Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from pigs during metaphylactic trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment and in the post-exposure period Poland Experimental 10151 10151 Duration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use P3 (8-wk-old cohort, sampled after 3 wks of AMU) P1 (6-wk-old cohort, sampled after 1 wk of AMU). Metaphylactic treatment: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as medicated fodder, 15–30 mg active substance/1 kg bw/day, to post-weaning piglets. Three Weeks (P3) One Week (P1) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column sul1 Escherichia coli False None False 48 None 32 None None None None None 82 59 None None None None 95.000
14561 14561 10056 None 11605 10.3390/ijerph120202150 Mazurek2015 Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from pigs during metaphylactic trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment and in the post-exposure period Poland Experimental 10151 10151 Duration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use P3 (8-wk-old cohort, sampled after 3 wks of AMU) P1 (6-wk-old cohort, sampled after 1 wk of AMU). Metaphylactic treatment: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as medicated fodder, 15–30 mg active substance/1 kg bw/day, to post-weaning piglets. Three Weeks (P3) One Week (P1) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column sul2 Escherichia coli False None False 25 None 7 None None None None None 82 59 None None None None 95.000
14562 14562 10056 None 11605 10.3390/ijerph120202150 Mazurek2015 Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from pigs during metaphylactic trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment and in the post-exposure period Poland Experimental 10151 10151 Duration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use P3 (8-wk-old cohort, sampled after 3 wks of AMU) P1 (6-wk-old cohort, sampled after 1 wk of AMU). Metaphylactic treatment: trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole as medicated fodder, 15–30 mg active substance/1 kg bw/day, to post-weaning piglets. Three Weeks (P3) One Week (P1) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column sul3 Escherichia coli False None False 26 None 23 None None None None None 82 59 None None None None 95.000
14563 14563 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10583 10583 Frequency of disinfection of livestock trail (never vs after housing out) Disinfection of livestock trail Never After housing out Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.17 None None 0.005 95.000
14564 14564 10208 None 9896 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.06.014 Hering2014 Prevalence and potential risk factors for the occurrence of cefotaxime resistant Escherichia coli in German fattening pig farms-A cross-sectional study Germany Observational 10582 10582 Frequency of disinfection of livestock trail (infrequently vs after housing out) Disinfection of livestock trail Infrequently After housing out Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Sample Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.63 None None 0.456 95.000
14565 14565 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10523 10523 Duration of antimicrobial use Classified based on farm prescribing data from the 6 months prior to sampling. Long-term use farms: AMU in-feed for >10 days post-weaning. Short-term use farms: AMU in-feed only up to 10 days post-weaning. AMR from Piglet stage: 0-3 wks old; 1.5-7 kg. Long-term AMU Short-term AMU Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.27 1.98 9.17 0.005 95.000
14566 14566 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10521 10521 Duration of antimicrobial use Classified based on farm prescribing data from the 6 months prior to sampling. Long-term use farms: AMU in-feed for >10 days post-weaning. Short-term use farms: AMU in-feed only up to 10 days post-weaning. AMR from Weaner 1 stage: 3-7 wks old; 7-20 kg. Long-term AMU Short-term AMU Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 5.07 2.09 12.30 0.008 95.000
14567 14567 10196 None 9486 10.1111/zph.12225 Gibbons2016 Antimicrobial Resistance of Faecal Escherichia coli Isolates from Pig Farms with Different Durations of In-feed Antimicrobial Use Ireland Observational 10522 10522 Duration of antimicrobial use Classified based on farm prescribing data from the 6 months prior to sampling. Long-term use farms: AMU in-feed for >10 days post-weaning. Short-term use farms: AMU in-feed only up to 10 days post-weaning. AMR from Finisher stage: 11-20 wks old; 32-85 kg. Long-term AMU Short-term AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pooled Sample Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.47 1.94 10.28 0.013 95.000
14568 14568 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14569 14569 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10104 10104 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Resistance outcome = ESBL. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 17.00 None 10.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14570 14570 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10106 10106 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Resistance outcome = imipenem. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14571 14571 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 42.00 None 30.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14572 14572 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 52.00 None 22.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14573 14573 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10105 10105 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Resistance outcome = imipenem. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14574 14574 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10103 10103 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Resistance outcome = ESBL. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 43.00 None 16.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14575 14575 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14576 14576 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column TEM (family) Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 87.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14577 14577 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10101 10101 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Resistance outcome = blaPSE-1 gene. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14578 14578 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column CTX-M-1 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 32.50 None 10.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14579 14579 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10098 10098 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Resistance outcome = blaCTX-M-2 group gene. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column CTX-M-2 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14580 14580 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column CTX-M-8 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14581 14581 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column CTX-M-9 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 10.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14582 14582 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10099 10099 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Resistance outcome = blaCTX-M-25/26 group gene. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14583 14583 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column aadA Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 67.00 None 17.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14584 14584 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column aadA2 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 52.00 None 12.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14585 14585 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column ANT(2)-Ia Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 52.00 None 17.50 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14586 14586 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column tet(A) Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 90.00 None 96.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14587 14587 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column tet(B) Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 40.00 None 32.50 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14588 14588 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column sul1 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 36.00 None 30.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14589 14589 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column sul2 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 23.00 None 20.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14590 14590 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column sul3 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 14.00 None 12.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14591 14591 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column dfrA1 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 30.00 None 30.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14592 14592 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column dfrA10 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 18.00 None 17.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14593 14593 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column dfrA12 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 12.50 None 22.50 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14594 14594 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column catA Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 36.00 None 38.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14595 14595 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column catB Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 26.00 None 20.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14596 14596 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10096 10096 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column mdfA Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 20.00 None 10.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14597 14597 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column mdfA Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 17.00 None 12.50 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14598 14598 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column catB Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 23.00 None 17.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14599 14599 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column catA Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 33.00 None 30.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14600 14600 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column dfrA12 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 20.00 None 18.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14601 14601 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column dfrA10 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 23.00 None 13.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14602 14602 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column dfrA1 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 22.00 None 38.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14603 14603 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column sul3 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 8.00 None 10.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14604 14604 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column sul2 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 20.00 None 18.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14605 14605 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column sul1 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 32.50 None 30.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14606 14606 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column tet(B) Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 47.50 None 32.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14607 14607 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column tet(A) Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 82.00 None 90.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14608 14608 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column ANT(2)-Ia Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 24.00 None 22.50 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14609 14609 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column aadA2 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 18.00 None 18.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14610 14610 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column aadA Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 22.50 None 22.50 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14611 14611 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10100 10100 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Resistance outcome = blaCTX-M-25/26 group gene. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14612 14612 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column CTX-M-9 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14613 14613 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column CTX-M-8 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14614 14614 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column CTX-M-2 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14615 14615 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column CTX-M-1 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 17.00 None 10.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14616 14616 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10102 10102 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Resistance outcome = blaPSE-1 gene. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14617 14617 10044 None 11355 10.1089/mdr.2018.0154 Lugsomya2018a Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli isolated from pigs and pork derived from farms either routinely using or not using in-feed antimicrobials Thailand Experimental 10097 10097 Combination of tiamulin and amoxicillin use Tiamulin at 100 ppm, amoxicillin at 250 ppm in feed. Tiamulin and amoxicillin use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None See gene column TEM (family) Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 87.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
14618 14618 20007 None 11304 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04765.x Logue2010 Repeated therapeutic dosing selects macrolide-resistant Campylobacter spp. in a turkey facility United States of America Experimental 11138 11138 Pulsed Tylosin Use Tylosin administered in water as Tylan Soluble in 3 separate dosing periods lasting 3 days each (0.53 g/L: therapeutic dose): between weeks 5 and 6, 12 and 13; 16 and 17, to simulate treatment of a recurring infection. Samples from Week 18. Tylosin use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter spp. False None False None None None None 88.61 None 0.00 None 25 12 None None None None 95.000
20001 20001 20034 None 9730 10.4315/0362-028x-69.3.482 Halbert2006 Genetic mechanisms contributing to reduced tetracycline susceptibility of Campylobacter isolated from organic and conventional dairy farms in the Midwestern and Northeastern United States United States of America Observational 11288 11288 Production type None None None Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None None None None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None None None None None None None None None None None 95.000
20003 20003 20000 None 10109 10.1128/aac.49.2.690-698.2005 Humphrey2005 Prevalence and Subtypes of Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Campylobacter spp. in Commercial Poultry Flocks before, during, and after Treatment with Fluoroquinolones United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 11109 11109 Difloxacin Use Flock 1 500 broilers, barn-reared treated with difloxacin (After=two weeks post treatment) After Before Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Quinolones difloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 11 2 2 12 None None None None 13 14 None None None None 95.000
20004 20004 20000 None 10109 10.1128/aac.49.2.690-698.2005 Humphrey2005 Prevalence and Subtypes of Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Campylobacter spp. in Commercial Poultry Flocks before, during, and after Treatment with Fluoroquinolones United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 11110 11110 Difloxacin Use Flock 3 300 broilers, free-range, treated with difloxacin (After=two weeks post treatment) After Before Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Quinolones difloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 10 2 1 13 None None None None 12 14 None None None None 95.000
20005 20005 20000 None 10109 10.1128/aac.49.2.690-698.2005 Humphrey2005 Prevalence and Subtypes of Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Campylobacter spp. in Commercial Poultry Flocks before, during, and after Treatment with Fluoroquinolones United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 11112 11112 Difloxacin Use Flock4 20,000 broilers treated with difloxacin (After=two weeks post treatment) After Before Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Quinolones difloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 10 4 0 13 None None None None 14 13 None None None None 95.000
20006 20006 20000 None 10109 10.1128/aac.49.2.690-698.2005 Humphrey2005 Prevalence and Subtypes of Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Campylobacter spp. in Commercial Poultry Flocks before, during, and after Treatment with Fluoroquinolones United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 11111 11111 Difloxacin Use Flock 5, 1250 free-range birds (After=two weeks post treatment) After Before Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Quinolones difloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 13 0 4 10 None None None None 13 14 None None None None 95.000
20009 20009 20000 None 10109 10.1128/aac.49.2.690-698.2005 Humphrey2005 Prevalence and Subtypes of Ciprofloxacin-Resistant Campylobacter spp. in Commercial Poultry Flocks before, during, and after Treatment with Fluoroquinolones United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 11113 11113 Enrofloxacin Use Flock 6, 5000 free-range birds (After=two weeks post treatment) After Before Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 8 6 4 7 None None None None 14 11 None None None None 95.000
20017 20017 20002 None 10452 10.4315/0362-028x-66.4.660 Jung2003 Reduction of Salmonella Typhimurium in experimentally challenged broilers by nitrate adaptation and chlorate supplementation in drinking water United States of America Experimental 11116 11116 Treatment TRIAL 1: A novobicin- and nalidixic acid-resistant strain of Salmonella Typhimurium were used as inoclua for challenging broilers. Trial 1 was challenged with 10^7 CFU of Salmonella Typhimurium per ml. Each Trial was divided in 4 treatment groups. SN Treatment Control Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 20 0 18 2 None None None None 20 20 None None None None 95.000
20018 20018 20002 None 10452 10.4315/0362-028x-66.4.660 Jung2003 Reduction of Salmonella Typhimurium in experimentally challenged broilers by nitrate adaptation and chlorate supplementation in drinking water United States of America Experimental 11115 11115 Treatment TRIAL 1: A novobicin- and nalidixic acid-resistant strain of Salmonella Typhimurium were used as inoclua for challenging broilers. Trial 1 was challenged with 10^7 CFU of Salmonella Typhimurium per ml. Each Trial was divided in 4 treatment groups ECP treatment Control Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 14 4 18 2 None None None None 18 20 None None None None 95.000
20019 20019 20002 None 10452 10.4315/0362-028x-66.4.660 Jung2003 Reduction of Salmonella Typhimurium in experimentally challenged broilers by nitrate adaptation and chlorate supplementation in drinking water United States of America Experimental 11117 11117 Treatment TRIAL 1:A novobicin- and nalidixic acid-resistant strain of Salmonella Typhimurium were used as inoclua for challenging broilers. Trial 1 was challenged with 10^7 CFU of Salmonella Typhimurium per ml. Each Trial was divided in 4 treatment groups SN + ECP Treatment Control Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 10 10 18 2 None None None None 20 20 None None None None 95.000
20020 20020 20002 None 10452 10.4315/0362-028x-66.4.660 Jung2003 Reduction of Salmonella Typhimurium in experimentally challenged broilers by nitrate adaptation and chlorate supplementation in drinking water United States of America Experimental 11119 11119 Treatment TRIAL 2: A novobicin- and nalidixic acid-resistant strain of Salmonella Typhimurium were used as inoclua for challenging broilers. Trial 2 was challenged with 10^9 CFU of Salmonella Typhimurium per ml. Each Trial was divided in 4 treatment groups SN Treatment Control Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 20 0 20 0 None None None None 20 20 None None None None 95.000
20021 20021 20002 None 10452 10.4315/0362-028x-66.4.660 Jung2003 Reduction of Salmonella Typhimurium in experimentally challenged broilers by nitrate adaptation and chlorate supplementation in drinking water United States of America Experimental 11118 11118 Treatment TRIAL 2: A novobicin- and nalidixic acid-resistant strain of Salmonella Typhimurium were used as inoclua for challenging broilers. Trial 2 was challenged with 10^9 CFU of Salmonella Typhimurium per ml. Each Trial was divided in 4 treatment groups ECP Treatment Control Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 19 1 20 0 None None None None 20 20 None None None None 95.000
20022 20022 20002 None 10452 10.4315/0362-028x-66.4.660 Jung2003 Reduction of Salmonella Typhimurium in experimentally challenged broilers by nitrate adaptation and chlorate supplementation in drinking water United States of America Experimental 11114 11114 AMU TRIAL 2: A novobicin- and nalidixic acid-resistant strain of Salmonella Typhimurium were used as inoclua for challenging broilers. Trial 2 was challenged with 10^9 CFU of Salmonella Typhimurium per ml. Each Trial was divided in 4 treatment groups SN+ECP Control Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 16 4 20 0 None None None None 20 20 None None None None 95.000
20024 20024 20004 None 10722 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.317 Kim2005a Effect of porcine-derived mucosal competitive exclusion culture on antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli from growing piglets United States of America Experimental 11130 11130 Treatment Treatment group was the use of Porcine-derived mucosal competitive exclusion vs. control. Tetracycline use 16 micrograms/mL Treatment Control Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 177 None 159 None 70.90 None 63.70 None 249 250 None None None None 95.000
20025 20025 20005 None 10972 10.4315/0362-028x-70.8.1945 Ladely2007 Development of macrolide-resistant Campylobacter in broilers administered subtherapeutic or therapeutic concentrations of tylosin United States of America Experimental 11131 11131 Tylosin Use Distribution of erythromycin resistance for C. jejuni and C. coli recovered from ceca receiving either subtherapeutic (22 ppm of tylosin phosphate) or therapeutic (529 ppm of tylosin tartrate) concentrations of tylosin. Using week 6 age. Subtherapeutic Therapeutic Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None None None None None None None None None None None 95.000
20026 20026 20003 None 10587 10.1089/fpd.2016.2161 Kassem2017 Antimicrobial-Resistant Campylobacter in Organically and Conventionally Raised Layer Chickens United States of America Observational 11120 11120 Production Type % Phenotypically resistant Campylobacter broken down by antimicrobial and compared across organic and conventional *EXTRACTED WITH PLOTDIGITIZER* Organic Conventional Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Combination False None False 79 None 69 None 64.00 None 56.00 None 124 124 None None None None 95.000
20040 20040 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11133 11133 Animal Health Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for healthy vs E. coli diseased pigs *Note: referred to as Mequindox in text Not healthy Healthy Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfaquinoxaline None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 6 None None None None None 102 204 None None None None 95.000
20041 20041 20007 None 11304 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04765.x Logue2010 Repeated therapeutic dosing selects macrolide-resistant Campylobacter spp. in a turkey facility United States of America Experimental 11139 11139 Tylosin use 30,000 turkey poults divided into halves with a control and the experimental receiving tylosin at three separate periods. Extracted week 18 *Results are estimated by % through plot digitizer* Treatment Control Turkey Poults None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 22 None 0 None 88.00 None 0.00 None 25 12 None None None None 95.000
20043 20043 20007 None 11304 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04765.x Logue2010 Repeated therapeutic dosing selects macrolide-resistant Campylobacter spp. in a turkey facility United States of America Experimental 11140 11140 Tylosin Use Comparing control vs treatment group of turkey poults at the plant stage Treatment Control Turkey Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Carcass Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 2 None 0 None 4.00 None 0.00 None 48 15 None None None None 95.000
20052 20052 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11184 11184 Therapeutic amikacin use Amikacin use broken up by treatment group Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None 0.00 None 0.00 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20053 20053 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11146 11146 Prophylactic amikacin use Amikacin use broken up by treatment group Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None 0.00 None 0.00 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20054 20054 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11147 11147 Prophylactic amoxicillin use Amoxicillin use broken up by treatment group Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 97.00 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20055 20055 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11185 11185 Therapeutic amoxicillin use Amoxicillin use broken up by treatment group Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 98.60 None 97.00 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20056 20056 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11186 11186 Therapeutic Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid use Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid use broken up by treatment group Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20057 20057 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11148 11148 Prophylactic Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid use Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid use broken up by treatment group Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.90 None 0.00 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20058 20058 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11149 11149 Prophylactic ampicillin use Ampicillin use broken up by treatment group Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 97.00 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20059 20059 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11187 11187 Therapeutic ampicillin use Ampicillin use broken up by treatment group Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 98.60 None 97.00 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20060 20060 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11205 11205 Therapeutic cefalexin use Cefalexin use broken up by treatment group Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal First-generation cephalosporins cefalexin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 8.60 None 0.00 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20061 20061 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11169 11169 Prophylactic cefalexin use Cefalexin use broken up by treatment group Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal First-generation cephalosporins cefalexin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 62.70 None 0.00 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20062 20062 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11170 11170 Prophylactic cefpirome use Cefpirome use broken up by treatment group Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Fourth-generation cephalosporins cefpirome None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.90 None 0.00 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20063 20063 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11206 11206 Therapeutic cefpirome use Cefpirome use broken up by treatment group Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Fourth-generation cephalosporins cefpirome None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20064 20064 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11207 11207 Therapeutic cefpodoxime use Cefpodoxime use broken up by treatment group Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Third-generation cephalosporins cefpodoxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 7.10 None 0.00 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20065 20065 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11171 11171 Prophylactic cefpodoxime use Cefpodoxime use broken up by treatment group Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Third-generation cephalosporins cefpodoxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 52.90 None 0.00 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20066 20066 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11172 11172 Prophylactic ceftiofur use Ceftiofur use broken up by treatment group Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 52.90 None 0.00 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20067 20067 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11208 11208 Therapeutic ceftiofur use Ceftiofur use broken up by treatment group Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 7.10 None 0.00 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20068 20068 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11209 11209 Therapeutic chloramphenicol use Chloramphenicol use broken up by treatment group Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 25.70 None 29.90 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20069 20069 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11173 11173 Prophylactic chloramphenicol use Chloramphenicol use broken up by treatment group Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 29.90 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20070 20070 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11174 11174 Prophylactic enrofloxacin use Enrofloxacin use broken up by treatment group Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 96.10 None 34.30 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20071 20071 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11210 11210 Therapeutic enrofloxacin use Enrofloxacin use broken up by treatment group Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 41.40 None 34.30 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20072 20072 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11211 11211 Therapeutic gentamicin use Gentamicin use broken up by treatment group Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 24.30 None 19.40 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20073 20073 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11175 11175 Prophylactic gentamicin use Gentamicin use broken up by treatment group Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 78.40 None 19.40 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20074 20074 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11176 11176 Prophylactic imipenem use Imipenem use broken up by treatment group Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20075 20075 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11212 11212 Therapeutic imipenem use Imipenem use broken up by treatment group Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20076 20076 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11213 11213 Therapeutic marbofloxacin use Marbofloxacin use broken up by treatment group Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Quinolones marbofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 41.40 None 35.80 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20077 20077 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11177 11177 Prophylactic marbofloxacin use Marbofloxacin use broken up by treatment group Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Quinolones marbofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 76.50 None 35.80 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20078 20078 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11178 11178 Prophylactic nitrofurantoin use Nitrofurantoin use broken up by treatment group Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 86.30 None 26.90 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20079 20079 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11214 11214 Therapeutic nitrofurantoin use Nitrofurantoin use broken up by treatment group Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 35.70 None 26.90 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20080 20080 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11215 11215 Therapeutic piperacillin use Piperacillin use broken up by treatment group Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Penicillins piperacillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 94.30 None 94.00 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20081 20081 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11179 11179 Prophylactic piperacillin use Piperacillin use broken up by treatment group Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Penicillins piperacillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 95.10 None 94.00 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20082 20082 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11180 11180 Prophylactic tetracycline use Tetracylcine use broken up by treatment group Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 83.60 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20083 20083 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11216 11216 Therapeutic tetracycline use Tetracylcine use broken up by treatment group Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 88.60 None 83.60 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20084 20084 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11217 11217 Therapeutic tiamulin use Tiamulin use broken up by treatment group Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Pleuromutilins tiamulin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 42.30 None 37.30 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20085 20085 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11181 11181 Prophylactic tiamulin use Tiamulin use broken up by treatment group Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Pleuromutilins tiamulin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 93.10 None 37.30 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20086 20086 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11182 11182 Prophylactic tobramycin use Tobramycin use broken up by treatment group Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Aminoglycosides tobramycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 69.60 None 20.90 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20087 20087 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11218 11218 Therapeutic tobramycin use Tobramycin use broken up by treatment group Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Aminoglycosides tobramycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 17.10 None 20.90 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20088 20088 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11219 11219 Therapeutic Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole use Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole use broken up by treatment group Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 18.60 None 23.90 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20089 20089 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11183 11183 Prophylactic Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole use Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole use broken up by treatment group Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 90.20 None 23.90 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20091 20091 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11188 11188 Therapeutic AMU Resistance outcome is aadA1 gene Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column aadA Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 17.10 None 25.40 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20092 20092 20010 None 11622 10.1086/339195 McDermott2002 Ciprofloxacin Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni Evolves Rapidly in Chickens Treated with Fluoroquinolones United States of America Experimental 11223 11223 Sarafloxacin Use Experimental groups of sarafloxacin and ciprofloxacin compared to non-medicated controls. *figure extraction using plotdigitizer* Sarafloxacin Day 26 Control Day 26 Chicken Broilers None None Placement Placement Prevalence Table Animal Quinolones sarafloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 74.00 None 0.00 None None None None None None None 95.000
20093 20093 20010 None 11622 10.1086/339195 McDermott2002 Ciprofloxacin Resistance in Campylobacter jejuni Evolves Rapidly in Chickens Treated with Fluoroquinolones United States of America Experimental 11222 11222 Ciprofloxacin Use Experimental groups of sarafloxacin and ciprofloxacin compared to non-medicated controls. *figure extraction using plotdigitizer* Ciprofloxacin Day 26 Control Day 26 Chicken Broilers None None Placement Placement Prevalence Table Animal Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 71.00 None 0.00 None None None None None None None 95.000
20159 20159 20003 None 10587 10.1089/fpd.2016.2161 Kassem2017 Antimicrobial-Resistant Campylobacter in Organically and Conventionally Raised Layer Chickens United States of America Observational 11121 11121 Production Type % Phenotypically resistant Campylobacter broken down by antimicrobial and compared across organic and conventional *EXTRACTED WITH PLOTDIGITIZER* Total Sample N pulled from page 31 Results and Discussion paragraph 1 Organic Conventional Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 6 None 15 None 5.00 None 12.00 None 124 124 None None None None 95.000
20160 20160 20003 None 10587 10.1089/fpd.2016.2161 Kassem2017 Antimicrobial-Resistant Campylobacter in Organically and Conventionally Raised Layer Chickens United States of America Observational 11121 11121 Production Type % Phenotypically resistant Campylobacter broken down by antimicrobial and compared across organic and conventional *EXTRACTED WITH PLOTDIGITIZER* Total Sample N pulled from page 31 Results and Discussion paragraph 1 Organic Conventional Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 21 None 31 None 17.00 None 25.00 None 124 124 None None None None 95.000
20161 20161 20003 None 10587 10.1089/fpd.2016.2161 Kassem2017 Antimicrobial-Resistant Campylobacter in Organically and Conventionally Raised Layer Chickens United States of America Observational 11122 11122 Production Type % Phenotypically resistant Campylobacter broken down by antimicrobial and compared across organic and conventional *EXTRACTED WITH PLOTDIGITIZER*Total Sample N pulled from page 31 Results and Discussion paragraph 1 Organic Conventional Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 1 None 1 None 10.00 None 12.00 None 124 124 None None None None 95.000
20162 20162 20003 None 10587 10.1089/fpd.2016.2161 Kassem2017 Antimicrobial-Resistant Campylobacter in Organically and Conventionally Raised Layer Chickens United States of America Observational 11121 11121 Production Type % Phenotypically resistant Campylobacter broken down by antimicrobial and compared across organic and conventional *EXTRACTED WITH PLOTDIGITIZER* Total Sample N pulled from page 31 Results and Discussion paragraph 1 Organic Conventional Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Macrolides tylosin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 21 None 45 None 17.00 None 36.00 None 124 124 None None None None 95.000
20163 20163 20004 None 10722 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.317 Kim2005a Effect of porcine-derived mucosal competitive exclusion culture on antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli from growing piglets United States of America Experimental 11129 11129 Treatment Treatment group was the use of Porcine-derived mucosal competitive exclusion vs. control. Tetracycline use 16 micrograms/mL Treatment Control Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 2336 None 2150 None 93.00 None 77.80 None 2512 2764 None None None None 95.000
20164 20164 20004 None 10722 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.317 Kim2005a Effect of porcine-derived mucosal competitive exclusion culture on antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli from growing piglets United States of America Experimental 11127 11127 Treatment Treatment group was the use of Porcine-derived mucosal competitive exclusion vs. control. Streptomycin use was 64 micrograms/mL Treatment Control Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 995 None 567 None 39.60 None 20.50 None 2512 2764 None None None None 95.000
20165 20165 20004 None 10722 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.317 Kim2005a Effect of porcine-derived mucosal competitive exclusion culture on antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli from growing piglets United States of America Experimental 11128 11128 Treatment Treatment group was the use of Porcine-derived mucosal competitive exclusion vs. control. Streptomycin use was 64 micrograms/mL Treatment Control Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 92 None 64 None 36.90 None 25.40 None 249 250 None None None None 95.000
20166 20166 20004 None 10722 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.317 Kim2005a Effect of porcine-derived mucosal competitive exclusion culture on antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli from growing piglets United States of America Experimental 11124 11124 Treatment Treatment group was the use of Porcine-derived mucosal competitive exclusion vs. control. Ampicillin use was 32 micrograms/mL Treatment Control Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 46 None 18 None 18.30 None 7.30 None 249 250 None None None None 95.000
20167 20167 20004 None 10722 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.317 Kim2005a Effect of porcine-derived mucosal competitive exclusion culture on antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli from growing piglets United States of America Experimental 11123 11123 Treatment Treatment group was the use of Porcine-derived mucosal competitive exclusion vs. control. Ampicillin use was 32 micrograms/mL Treatment Control Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 93 None 91 None 3.70 None 3.30 None 2512 2764 None None None None 95.000
20168 20168 20004 None 10722 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.317 Kim2005a Effect of porcine-derived mucosal competitive exclusion culture on antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli from growing piglets United States of America Experimental 11125 11125 Treatment Treatment group was the use of Porcine-derived mucosal competitive exclusion vs. control. Apramycin use was 32 micrograms/mL Treatment Control Swine Piglets None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 0 None 0.20 None 0.00 None 2512 2764 None None None None 95.000
20169 20169 20004 None 10722 10.1089/fpd.2005.2.317 Kim2005a Effect of porcine-derived mucosal competitive exclusion culture on antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli from growing piglets United States of America Experimental 11126 11126 Treatment Treatment group was the use of Porcine-derived mucosal competitive exclusion vs. control. Apramycin use was 32 micrograms/mL Treatment Control Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Aminoglycosides apramycin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 1 None 0.00 None 0.50 None 249 250 None None None None 95.000
20171 20171 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11132 11132 Animal Health Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for healthy vs E. coli diseased pigs Not Healthy Healthy Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones olaquindox None Escherichia coli False None False 28 None 16 None None None None None 102 204 None None None None 95.000
20172 20172 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11132 11132 Animal Health Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for healthy vs E. coli diseased pigs Not Healthy Healthy Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 69 None 32 None None None None None 102 204 None None None None 95.000
20173 20173 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11132 11132 Animal Health Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for healthy vs E. coli diseased pigs Not Healthy Healthy Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 101 None 193 None None None None None 102 204 None None None None 95.000
20174 20174 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11132 11132 Animal Health Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for healthy vs E. coli diseased pigs Not Healthy Healthy Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols florfenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 84 None 135 None None None None None 102 204 None None None None 95.000
20175 20175 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11132 11132 Animal Health Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for healthy vs E. coli diseased pigs Not Healthy Healthy Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines doxycycline None Escherichia coli False None False 77 None 113 None None None None None 102 204 None None None None 95.000
20176 20176 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11134 11134 Animal Health Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for healthy vs E. coli diseased pigs *reffered to as oxycycline in the text* Not Healthy Healthy Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 102 None 196 None None None None None 102 204 None None None None 95.000
20177 20177 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11132 11132 Animal Health Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for healthy vs E. coli diseased pigs Not Healthy Healthy Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 2 None None None None None 102 204 None None None None 95.000
20178 20178 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11132 11132 Animal Health Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for healthy vs E. coli diseased pigs Not Healthy Healthy Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 66 None 32 None None None None None 102 204 None None None None 95.000
20179 20179 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11132 11132 Animal Health Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for healthy vs E. coli diseased pigs Not Healthy Healthy Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Fourth-generation cephalosporins cefquinome None Escherichia coli False None False 60 None 24 None None None None None 102 204 None None None None 95.000
20180 20180 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11132 11132 Animal Health Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for healthy vs E. coli diseased pigs Not Healthy Healthy Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 63 None 27 None None None None None 102 204 None None None None 95.000
20181 20181 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11132 11132 Animal Health Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for healthy vs E. coli diseased pigs Not Healthy Healthy Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 102 None 204 None None None None None 102 204 None None None None 95.000
20182 20182 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11132 11132 Animal Health Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for healthy vs E. coli diseased pigs Not Healthy Healthy Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Polymyxins colistin None Escherichia coli False None False 46 None 35 None None None None None 102 204 None None None None 95.000
20183 20183 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11136 11136 mcr-1 gene Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for mcr-1 positive vs negative pigs (combined across healthy and not healthy pigs) mcr-1 positive mcr-1 negative Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Polymyxins colistin None Escherichia coli False None False 78 None 3 None None None None None 78 228 None None None None 95.000
20184 20184 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11136 11136 mcr-1 gene Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for mcr-1 positive vs negative pigs (combined across healthy and not healthy pigs) mcr-1 positive mcr-1 negative Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 78 None 228 None None None None None 78 228 None None None None 95.000
20185 20185 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11136 11136 mcr-1 gene Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for mcr-1 positive vs negative pigs (combined across healthy and not healthy pigs) mcr-1 positive mcr-1 negative Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 41 None 49 None None None None None 78 228 None None None None 95.000
20186 20186 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11136 11136 mcr-1 gene Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for mcr-1 positive vs negative pigs (combined across healthy and not healthy pigs) mcr-1 positive mcr-1 negative Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Fourth-generation cephalosporins cefquinome None Escherichia coli False None False 39 None 45 None None None None None 78 228 None None None None 95.000
20187 20187 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11136 11136 mcr-1 gene Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for mcr-1 positive vs negative pigs (combined across healthy and not healthy pigs) mcr-1 positive mcr-1 negative Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 38 None 58 None None None None None 78 228 None None None None 95.000
20188 20188 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11136 11136 mcr-1 gene Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for mcr-1 positive vs negative pigs (combined across healthy and not healthy pigs) mcr-1 positive mcr-1 negative Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 9 None None None None None 78 228 None None None None 95.000
20189 20189 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11136 11136 mcr-1 gene Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for mcr-1 positive vs negative pigs (combined across healthy and not healthy pigs) mcr-1 positive mcr-1 negative Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 78 None 220 None None None None None 78 228 None None None None 95.000
20190 20190 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11136 11136 mcr-1 gene Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for mcr-1 positive vs negative pigs (combined across healthy and not healthy pigs) mcr-1 positive mcr-1 negative Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines doxycycline None Escherichia coli False None False 56 None 134 None None None None None 78 228 None None None None 95.000
20191 20191 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11136 11136 mcr-1 gene Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for mcr-1 positive vs negative pigs (combined across healthy and not healthy pigs) mcr-1 positive mcr-1 negative Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols florfenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 72 None 147 None None None None None 78 228 None None None None 95.000
20192 20192 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11136 11136 mcr-1 gene Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for mcr-1 positive vs negative pigs (combined across healthy and not healthy pigs) mcr-1 positive mcr-1 negative Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 75 None 219 None None None None None 78 228 None None None None 95.000
20193 20193 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11136 11136 mcr-1 gene Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for mcr-1 positive vs negative pigs (combined across healthy and not healthy pigs) mcr-1 positive mcr-1 negative Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 45 None 56 None None None None None 78 228 None None None None 95.000
20194 20194 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11136 11136 mcr-1 gene Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for mcr-1 positive vs negative pigs (combined across healthy and not healthy pigs) mcr-1 positive mcr-1 negative Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones olaquindox None Escherichia coli False None False 26 None 17 None None None None None 78 228 None None None None 95.000
20195 20195 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11137 11137 mcr-1 gene Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for mcr-1 positive vs negative pigs (combined across healthy and not healthy pigs) *referred to as mequindox in the text* mcr-1 positive mcr-1 negative Swine Not Specified None None Placement Placement Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfaquinoxaline None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 6 None None None None None 78 228 None None None None 95.000
20196 20196 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11143 11143 Production type Resistance rates of campylobacter strains isolated from conventional vs organic farms broken down by antimicrobial agent. The whole intestinal tract was removed for testing at the abattoir and the origin of the animals was traced organic farm conventional farm Turkey Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Animal Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 10 None 63 None None None None None 161 201 None None None None 95.000
20199 20199 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11142 11142 Production type Resistance rates of campylobacter strains isolated from conventional vs organic farms broken down by antimicrobial agent. The whole intestinal tract was removed for testing at the abattoir and the origin of the animals was traced organic farm conventional farm Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Animal Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 5 None 0 None None None None None 165 167 None None None None 95.000
20200 20200 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11142 11142 Production type Resistance rates of campylobacter strains isolated from conventional vs organic farms broken down by antimicrobial agent. The whole intestinal tract was removed for testing at the abattoir and the origin of the animals was traced organic farm conventional farm Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Animal Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Combination False None False 99 None 141 None None None None None 165 167 None None None None 95.000
20201 20201 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11142 11142 Production type Resistance rates of campylobacter strains isolated from conventional vs organic farms broken down by antimicrobial agent. The whole intestinal tract was removed for testing at the abattoir and the origin of the animals was traced organic farm conventional farm Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Animal Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 165 167 None None None None 95.000
20202 20202 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11142 11142 Production type Resistance rates of campylobacter strains isolated from conventional vs organic farms broken down by antimicrobial agent. The whole intestinal tract was removed for testing at the abattoir and the origin of the animals was traced organic farm conventional farm Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Animal Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 28 None 19 None None None None None 165 167 None None None None 95.000
20203 20203 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11142 11142 Production type Resistance rates of campylobacter strains isolated from conventional vs organic farms broken down by antimicrobial agent. The whole intestinal tract was removed for testing at the abattoir and the origin of the animals was traced organic farm conventional farm Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Animal Lincosamides clindamycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 9 None 2 None None None None None 165 167 None None None None 95.000
20204 20204 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11142 11142 Production type Resistance rates of campylobacter strains isolated from conventional vs organic farms broken down by antimicrobial agent. The whole intestinal tract was removed for testing at the abattoir and the origin of the animals was traced organic farm conventional farm Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Animal Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 15 None 0 None None None None None 165 167 None None None None 95.000
20205 20205 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11142 11142 Production type Resistance rates of campylobacter strains isolated from conventional vs organic farms broken down by antimicrobial agent. The whole intestinal tract was removed for testing at the abattoir and the origin of the animals was traced organic farm conventional farm Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Animal Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 0 None 76 None None None None None 165 167 None None None None 95.000
20206 20206 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11142 11142 Production type Resistance rates of campylobacter strains isolated from conventional vs organic farms broken down by antimicrobial agent. The whole intestinal tract was removed for testing at the abattoir and the origin of the animals was traced organic farm conventional farm Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Animal Quinolones norfloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 0 None 77 None None None None None 165 167 None None None None 95.000
20207 20207 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11142 11142 Production type Resistance rates of campylobacter strains isolated from conventional vs organic farms broken down by antimicrobial agent. The whole intestinal tract was removed for testing at the abattoir and the origin of the animals was traced organic farm conventional farm Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Animal Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter Combination False None False 0 None 77 None None None None None 165 167 None None None None 95.000
20208 20208 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11143 11143 Production type Resistance rates of campylobacter strains isolated from conventional vs organic farms broken down by antimicrobial agent. The whole intestinal tract was removed for testing at the abattoir and the origin of the animals was traced organic farm conventional farm Turkey Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Animal Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Combination False None False 81 None 186 None None None None None 161 201 None None None None 95.000
20209 20209 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11143 11143 Production type Resistance rates of campylobacter strains isolated from conventional vs organic farms broken down by antimicrobial agent. The whole intestinal tract was removed for testing at the abattoir and the origin of the animals was traced organic farm conventional farm Turkey Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Animal Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 161 201 None None None None 95.000
20210 20210 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11143 11143 Production type Resistance rates of campylobacter strains isolated from conventional vs organic farms broken down by antimicrobial agent. The whole intestinal tract was removed for testing at the abattoir and the origin of the animals was traced organic farm conventional farm Turkey Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Animal Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 50 None 153 None None None None None 161 201 None None None None 95.000
20211 20211 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11143 11143 Production type Resistance rates of campylobacter strains isolated from conventional vs organic farms broken down by antimicrobial agent. The whole intestinal tract was removed for testing at the abattoir and the origin of the animals was traced organic farm conventional farm Turkey Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Animal Lincosamides clindamycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 5 None 129 None None None None None 161 201 None None None None 95.000
20212 20212 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11143 11143 Production type Resistance rates of campylobacter strains isolated from conventional vs organic farms broken down by antimicrobial agent. The whole intestinal tract was removed for testing at the abattoir and the origin of the animals was traced organic farm conventional farm Turkey Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Animal Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 5 None 160 None None None None None 161 201 None None None None 95.000
20213 20213 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11143 11143 Production type Resistance rates of campylobacter strains isolated from conventional vs organic farms broken down by antimicrobial agent. The whole intestinal tract was removed for testing at the abattoir and the origin of the animals was traced organic farm conventional farm Turkey Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Animal Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 3 None 136 None None None None None 161 201 None None None None 95.000
20214 20214 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11143 11143 Production type Resistance rates of campylobacter strains isolated from conventional vs organic farms broken down by antimicrobial agent. The whole intestinal tract was removed for testing at the abattoir and the origin of the animals was traced organic farm conventional farm Turkey Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Animal Quinolones norfloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 3 None 134 None None None None None 161 201 None None None None 95.000
20215 20215 20008 None 11342 10.1128/aem.72.5.3600-3607.2006 Luangtongkum2006 Effect of Conventional and Organic Production Practices on the Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry United States of America Observational 11143 11143 Production type Resistance rates of campylobacter strains isolated from conventional vs organic farms broken down by antimicrobial agent. The whole intestinal tract was removed for testing at the abattoir and the origin of the animals was traced organic farm conventional farm Turkey Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Animal Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter Combination False None False 3 None 135 None None None None None 161 201 None None None None 95.000
20216 20216 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11150 11150 Prophylactic AMU Resistance outcome is aadA1 gene Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column aadA Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 63.70 None 25.40 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20217 20217 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11151 11151 Prophylactic AMU Resistance outcome is aadA2 gene Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column aadA2 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 54.90 None 22.40 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20218 20218 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11189 11189 Therapeutic AMU Resistance outcome is aadA2 gene Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column aadA2 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 14.30 None 22.40 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20219 20219 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11190 11190 Therapeutic AMU Resistance outcome is aadB gene Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column ANT(2)-Ia Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 25.70 None 35.80 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20220 20220 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11152 11152 Prophylactic AMU Resistance outcome is aadB gene Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column ANT(2)-Ia Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 67.60 None 35.80 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20221 20221 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11191 11191 Therapeutic AMU Resistance outcome is blaCTX-M-1 gene Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column CTX-M-1 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.70 None 0.00 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20222 20222 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11153 11153 Prophylactic AMU Resistance outcome is blaCTX-M-1 gene Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column CTX-M-1 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 36.30 None 0.00 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20223 20223 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11154 11154 Prophylactic AMU Resistance outcome is blaCTX-M9 gene Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column CTX-M-9 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 18.60 None 0.00 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20224 20224 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11220 11220 Therpeutic AMU Resistance outcome is blaCTX-M9 gene Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column CTX-M-9 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20225 20225 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11221 11221 Therpeutic AMU Resistance outcome is blaTEM gene Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column TEM (family) Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 88.60 None 86.60 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20226 20226 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11155 11155 Prophylactic AMU Resistance outcome is blaTEM gene Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column TEM (family) Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 90.20 None 86.60 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20227 20227 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11192 11192 Therapeutic AMU Resistance outcome is catA gene Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column catA Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 32.90 None 28.40 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20228 20228 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11156 11156 Prophylactic AMU Resistance outcome is catA gene Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column catA Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 52.00 None 28.40 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20229 20229 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11193 11193 Therapeutic AMU Resistance outcome is catB gene Therpeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column catB Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 28.60 None 30.40 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20230 20230 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11157 11157 Prophylactic AMU Resistance outcome is catB gene Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column catB Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 63.70 None 28.60 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20231 20231 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11194 11194 Therapeutic AMU Resistance outcome is cmlA gene Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column mdfA Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.40 None 1.50 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20232 20232 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11158 11158 Prophylactic AMU Resistance outcome is cmlA gene Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column mdfA Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 19.60 None 1.50 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20233 20233 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11195 11195 Therapeutic AMU Resistance outcome is dfrA1 gene Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column dfrA1 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 17.10 None 16.40 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20234 20234 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11159 11159 Prophylactic AMU Resistance outcome is dfrA1 gene Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column dfrA1 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 18.60 None 16.40 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20235 20235 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11196 11196 Therapeutic AMU Resistance outcome is dfrA10 gene Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column dfrA10 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 8.60 None 9.00 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20236 20236 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11160 11160 Prophylactic AMU Resistance outcome is dfrA10 gene Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column dfrA10 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 20.60 None 9.00 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20237 20237 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11197 11197 Therapeutic AMU Resistance outcome is dfrA12 gene Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column dfrA12 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 18.60 None 14.90 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20238 20238 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11161 11161 Prophylactic AMU Resistance outcome is dfrA12 gene Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column dfrA12 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 47.10 None 14.90 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20239 20239 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11200 11200 Therapeutic AMU Resistance outcome is sul1 gene Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column sul1 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.30 None 6.00 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20240 20240 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11164 11164 Prophylactic AMU Resistance outcome is sul1 gene Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column sul1 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 18.60 None 6.00 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20241 20241 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11201 11201 Therapeutic AMU Resistance outcome is sul2 gene Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column sul2 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 14.30 None 10.40 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20242 20242 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11165 11165 Prophylactic AMU Resistance outcome is sul2 gene Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column sul2 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 32.40 None 10.40 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20243 20243 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11202 11202 Therapeutic AMU Resistance outcome is sul3 gene Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column sul3 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 35.70 None 29.90 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20244 20244 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11166 11166 Prophylactic AMU Resistance outcome is sul3 gene Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column sul3 Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 55.90 None 29.90 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20245 20245 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11203 11203 Therapeutic AMU Resistance outcome is tetA gene Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column tet(A) Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 82.90 None 91.00 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20246 20246 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11167 11167 Prophylactic AMU Resistance outcome is tetA gene Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column tet(A) Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 90.20 None 91.00 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20247 20247 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11204 11204 Therapeutic AMU Resistance outcome is tetB gene Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column tet(B) Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 17.10 None 19.40 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20248 20248 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11168 11168 Prophylactic AMU Resistance outcome is tetB gene Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None See gene column tet(B) Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 47.10 None 19.40 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20249 20249 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11199 11199 Therapeutic AMU Resistance outcome is Int1 gene Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 29.90 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20250 20250 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11163 11163 Prophylactic AMU Resistance outcome is Int1 gene Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 29.90 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20251 20251 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11198 11198 Therapeutic AMU Resistance outcome is ESBP E. coli gene Therapeutic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 7.10 None 0.00 None 70 67 None None None None 95.000
20252 20252 20009 None 11354 10.1089/mdr.2017.0042 Lugsomya2018 Routine Prophylactic Antimicrobial Use Is Associated with Increased Phenotypic and Genotypic Resistance in Commensal Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Healthy Fattening Pigs on Farms in Thailand Thailand Observational 11162 11162 Prophylactic AMU Resistance outcome is ESBP E. coli gene Prophylactic AMU No AMU Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 52.90 None 0.00 None 102 67 None None None None 95.000
20254 20254 20014 None 12313 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.013 Ozawa2012 Associations of antimicrobial use with antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from grow-finish pigs in Japan Japan Observational 11224 11224 Aminoglycoside use None Aminoglycoside use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 5 0 54 96 None None None None 5 150 None None None None 95.000
20255 20255 20014 None 12313 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.013 Ozawa2012 Associations of antimicrobial use with antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from grow-finish pigs in Japan Japan Observational 11224 11224 Aminoglycoside use None Aminoglycoside use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 4 1 72 78 None None None None 5 150 None None None None 95.000
20256 20256 20014 None 12313 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.013 Ozawa2012 Associations of antimicrobial use with antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from grow-finish pigs in Japan Japan Observational 11224 11224 Aminoglycoside use None Aminoglycoside use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter coli False None False 1 4 50 100 None None None None 5 150 None None None None 95.000
20257 20257 20014 None 12313 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.013 Ozawa2012 Associations of antimicrobial use with antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from grow-finish pigs in Japan Japan Observational 11225 11225 Beta-lactam use None Beta-lactam use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 8 5 51 91 None None None None 13 142 None None None None 95.000
20258 20258 20014 None 12313 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.013 Ozawa2012 Associations of antimicrobial use with antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from grow-finish pigs in Japan Japan Observational 11225 11225 Beta-lactam use None Beta-lactam use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 9 4 67 75 None None None None 13 142 None None None None 95.000
20259 20259 20014 None 12313 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.013 Ozawa2012 Associations of antimicrobial use with antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from grow-finish pigs in Japan Japan Observational 11225 11225 Beta-lactam use None Beta-lactam use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter coli False None False 3 10 48 94 None None None None 13 142 None None None None 95.000
20260 20260 20014 None 12313 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.013 Ozawa2012 Associations of antimicrobial use with antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from grow-finish pigs in Japan Japan Observational 11226 11226 Fluoroquinolone use None Fluoroquinolone use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 7 51 97 None None None None 7 148 None None None None 95.000
20261 20261 20014 None 12313 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.013 Ozawa2012 Associations of antimicrobial use with antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from grow-finish pigs in Japan Japan Observational 11226 11226 Fluoroquinolone use None Fluoroquinolone use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 4 3 72 76 None None None None 7 148 None None None None 95.000
20262 20262 20014 None 12313 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.013 Ozawa2012 Associations of antimicrobial use with antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from grow-finish pigs in Japan Japan Observational 11226 11226 Fluoroquinolone use None Fluoroquinolone use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 4 3 55 93 None None None None 7 148 None None None None 95.000
20263 20263 20014 None 12313 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.013 Ozawa2012 Associations of antimicrobial use with antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from grow-finish pigs in Japan Japan Observational 11227 11227 Macrolide use None Macrolide use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 13 9 46 87 None None None None 22 133 None None None None 95.000
20264 20264 20014 None 12313 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.013 Ozawa2012 Associations of antimicrobial use with antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from grow-finish pigs in Japan Japan Observational 11227 11227 Macrolide use None Macrolide use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 19 3 57 76 None None None None 22 133 None None None None 95.000
20265 20265 20014 None 12313 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.013 Ozawa2012 Associations of antimicrobial use with antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from grow-finish pigs in Japan Japan Observational 11227 11227 Macrolide use None Macrolide use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter coli False None False 12 10 39 94 None None None None 22 133 None None None None 95.000
20266 20266 20014 None 12313 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.013 Ozawa2012 Associations of antimicrobial use with antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from grow-finish pigs in Japan Japan Observational 11228 11228 Phenicol use None Phenicol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter coli False None False 6 1 45 103 None None None None 7 148 None None None None 95.000
20267 20267 20014 None 12313 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.013 Ozawa2012 Associations of antimicrobial use with antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from grow-finish pigs in Japan Japan Observational 11228 11228 Phenicol use None Phenicol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 3 4 73 75 None None None None 7 148 None None None None 95.000
20268 20268 20014 None 12313 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.013 Ozawa2012 Associations of antimicrobial use with antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from grow-finish pigs in Japan Japan Observational 11228 11228 Phenicol use None Phenicol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 2 5 57 91 None None None None 7 148 None None None None 95.000
20269 20269 20014 None 12313 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.013 Ozawa2012 Associations of antimicrobial use with antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from grow-finish pigs in Japan Japan Observational 11229 11229 Sulfonamide use None Sulfonamide use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 10 12 49 84 None None None None 22 133 None None None None 95.000
20270 20270 20014 None 12313 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.013 Ozawa2012 Associations of antimicrobial use with antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from grow-finish pigs in Japan Japan Observational 11229 11229 Sulfonamide use None Sulfonamide use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 15 7 61 72 None None None None 22 133 None None None None 95.000
20271 20271 20014 None 12313 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.013 Ozawa2012 Associations of antimicrobial use with antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from grow-finish pigs in Japan Japan Observational 11229 11229 Sulfonamide use None Sulfonamide use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter coli False None False 9 13 42 91 None None None None 22 133 None None None None 95.000
20272 20272 20014 None 12313 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.013 Ozawa2012 Associations of antimicrobial use with antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from grow-finish pigs in Japan Japan Observational 11230 11230 Tetracycline use None Tetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter coli False None False 14 13 37 91 None None None None 27 128 None None None None 95.000
20273 20273 20014 None 12313 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.013 Ozawa2012 Associations of antimicrobial use with antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from grow-finish pigs in Japan Japan Observational 11230 11230 Tetracycline use None Tetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 17 10 59 69 None None None None 27 128 None None None None 95.000
20274 20274 20014 None 12313 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.013 Ozawa2012 Associations of antimicrobial use with antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter coli from grow-finish pigs in Japan Japan Observational 11230 11230 Tetracycline use None Tetracycline use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 12 15 47 81 None None None None 27 128 None None None None 95.000
20275 20275 20015 None 12591 10.1289/ehp.7647 Price2005 Fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter isolates from conventional and antibiotic-free chicken products United States of America Observational 11231 11231 Production Type Antibiotic-free (aggregated Brand A+B) vs conventional (aggregated Brand C+D), nonselective medium extracted. AMR is fluoroquinolone-resistant Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat None None None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False 3 42 12 33 None None None None 45 45 None None None None 95.000
20276 20276 20016 None 12593 10.1289/ehp.10050 Price2007 The persistence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter in poultry production United States of America Observational 11236 11236 Production Type 2004 or Pre-Ban: Antibiotic-free (Aggregated producers A+B+C) vs Conventional (Aggregated producers D+E), Fluoroquinolone resistant campylobacter Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat None None None Campylobacter Combination False None False 3 115 17 63 None None None None 118 80 None None None None 95.000
20277 20277 20016 None 12593 10.1289/ehp.10050 Price2007 The persistence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter in poultry production United States of America Observational 11237 11237 Production Type 2006 or Post-Ban: Antibiotic-free (Aggregated producers A+B+C) vs Conventional (Aggregated producers D+E), Fluoroquinolone resistant campylobacter Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat None None None Campylobacter Combination False None False 6 114 31 59 None None None None 120 90 None None None None 95.000
20278 20278 20016 None 12593 10.1289/ehp.10050 Price2007 The persistence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter in poultry production United States of America Observational 11234 11234 Fluoroquinolone Usage Ban Antibiotic free (ABF) farms 2004 vs ABF farms 2006, fluoroquinlone resistance ABF 2006 ABF 2004 Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat None None None Campylobacter Combination False None False 6 114 3 115 None None None None 120 118 None None None None 95.000
20279 20279 20016 None 12593 10.1289/ehp.10050 Price2007 The persistence of fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter in poultry production United States of America Observational 11235 11235 Fluoroquinolone Usage Ban Conventional (Conv) farms 2004 vsConventional farms 2006, fluoroquinlone resistance Conv 2006 Conv 2004 Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat None None None Campylobacter Combination False None False 21 None 17 63 None None None None 90 80 None None None None 95.000
20280 20280 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11242 11242 Production type 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (herd unit) Antimicrobial free farm Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Macrolides azithromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 14 16 52 3 None None None None 30 55 None None None None 95.000
20281 20281 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11242 11242 Production type 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (herd unit) Antimicrobial free farm Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 15 15 52 3 None None None None 30 55 None None None None 95.000
20282 20282 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11242 11242 Production type 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (herd unit) Antimicrobial free farm Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 4 26 1 54 None None None None 30 55 None None None None 95.000
20283 20283 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11242 11242 Production type 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (herd unit) Antimicrobial free farm Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter Combination False None False 4 26 3 52 None None None None 30 55 None None None None 95.000
20284 20284 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11242 11242 Production type 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (herd unit) Antimicrobial free farm Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 0 30 0 55 None None None None 30 55 None None None None 95.000
20285 20285 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11242 11242 Production type 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (herd unit) Antimicrobial free farm Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Combination False None False 25 5 50 5 None None None None 30 55 None None None None 95.000
20286 20286 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11243 11243 Production type 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (isolate unit) Antimicrobial free farm Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides azithromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 35 139 200 90 None None None None 174 290 None None None None 95.000
20287 20287 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11243 11243 Production type 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (isolate unit) Antimicrobial free farm Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 37 None 198 None None None None None 174 290 None None None None 95.000
20288 20288 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11243 11243 Production type 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (isolate unit) Antimicrobial free farm Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 6 None 11 None None None None None 174 290 None None None None 95.000
20289 20289 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11243 11243 Production type 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (isolate unit) Antimicrobial free farm Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter Combination False None False 6 None 13 None None None None None 174 290 None None None None 95.000
20290 20290 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11243 11243 Production type 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (isolate unit) Antimicrobial free farm Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 174 290 None None None None 95.000
20291 20291 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11243 11243 Production type 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (isolate unit) Antimicrobial free farm Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Combination False None False 85 None 216 None None None None None 174 290 None None None None 95.000
20292 20292 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11245 11245 Production type (duration) 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (isolate unit), for different durations of antimicrobial free Antimicrobial free 1-2yr Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides azithromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 11 None 200 None None None None None 29 290 None None None None 95.000
20293 20293 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11246 11246 Production type (duration) 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (isolate unit), for different durations of antimicrobial free Antimicrobial free 3 yr Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides azithromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 12 None 200 None None None None None 55 290 None None None None 95.000
20294 20294 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11247 11247 Production type (duration) 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (isolate unit), for different durations of antimicrobial free Antimicrobial free 4-5 yr Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides azithromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 7 None 200 None None None None None 47 290 None None None None 95.000
20295 20295 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11248 11248 Production type (duration) 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (isolate unit), for different durations of antimicrobial free Antimicrobial free 6+ yr Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides azithromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 5 None 200 None None None None None 43 290 None None None None 95.000
20296 20296 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11244 11244 Production type (duration) 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (isolate unit), for different durations of antimicrobial free Antimicrobial free 1-2 yr Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 11 None 198 None None None None None 29 290 None None None None 95.000
20297 20297 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11246 11246 Production type (duration) 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (isolate unit), for different durations of antimicrobial free Antimicrobial free 3 yr Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 12 None 198 None None None None None 55 290 None None None None 95.000
20298 20298 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11247 11247 Production type (duration) 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (isolate unit), for different durations of antimicrobial free Antimicrobial free 4-5 yr Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 8 None 198 None None None None None 47 290 None None None None 95.000
20299 20299 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11248 11248 Production type (duration) 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (isolate unit), for different durations of antimicrobial free Antimicrobial free 6+ yr Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 6 None 198 None None None None None 43 290 None None None None 95.000
20300 20300 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11244 11244 Production type (duration) 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (isolate unit), for different durations of antimicrobial free Antimicrobial free 1-2 yr Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Combination False None False 17 None 216 None None None None None 29 290 None None None None 95.000
20301 20301 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11246 11246 Production type (duration) 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (isolate unit), for different durations of antimicrobial free Antimicrobial free 3 yr Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Combination False None False 34 None 216 None None None None None 55 290 None None None None 95.000
20302 20302 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11247 11247 Production type (duration) 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (isolate unit), for different durations of antimicrobial free Antimicrobial free 4-5 yr Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Combination False None False 15 None 216 None None None None None 47 290 None None None None 95.000
20303 20303 20017 None 12888 10.2460/javma.236.2.201 Rollo2010 Prevalence and patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp isolated from pigs reared under antimicrobial-free and conventional production methods in eight states in the Midwestern United States United States of America Observational 11248 11248 Production type (duration) 30 antimicrobial free (AMF) swine farms vs 55 conventional swine farms (isolate unit), for different durations of antimicrobial free Antimicrobial free 6+ yr Conventional farm Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Combination False None False 19 None 216 None None None None None 43 290 None None None None 95.000
20304 20304 20018 None 12919 10.4315/0362-028x-72.3.482 Rosengren2009 Associations between antimicrobial exposure and resistance in fecal Campylobacter spp. from grow-finish pigs on-farrn in alberta and saskatchewan, Canada Canada Observational 11250 11250 Macrolide use Macrolide use and resistance: odds of resistance to a macrolide for every 100,000 pig days macrolides were administered to nursery pigs For every 100,000 days macrolides were administered to nursery pigs None Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pen None None None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.30 1.00 1.60 0.049 95.000
20305 20305 20018 None 12919 10.4315/0362-028x-72.3.482 Rosengren2009 Associations between antimicrobial exposure and resistance in fecal Campylobacter spp. from grow-finish pigs on-farrn in alberta and saskatchewan, Canada Canada Observational 11251 11251 Quinolone use Quinolone use and resistance: Odds of resistance to a quinolone in herds with no use compared to herds with exposure No beta-lactam use Beta-lactam use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Pen None None None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None None None None None None None 8.90 1.30 61.90 0.03 95.000
20306 20306 20019 None 13009 10.1111/zph.12279 Salaheen2016 Ecological Dynamics of Campylobacter in Integrated Mixed Crop-Livestock Farms and Its Prevalence and Survival Ability in Post-Harvest Products United States of America Observational 11252 11252 Production type Organic retail poultry meat vs conventional retail poultry meat Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Carcass Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 20 None 11 None None None None None 60 22 None None None None 95.000
20307 20307 20019 None 13009 10.1111/zph.12279 Salaheen2016 Ecological Dynamics of Campylobacter in Integrated Mixed Crop-Livestock Farms and Its Prevalence and Survival Ability in Post-Harvest Products United States of America Observational 11252 11252 Production type Organic retail poultry meat vs conventional retail poultry meat Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Carcass Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter Combination False None False 19 None 11 None None None None None 60 22 None None None None 95.000
20308 20308 20019 None 13009 10.1111/zph.12279 Salaheen2016 Ecological Dynamics of Campylobacter in Integrated Mixed Crop-Livestock Farms and Its Prevalence and Survival Ability in Post-Harvest Products United States of America Observational 11252 11252 Production type Organic retail poultry meat vs conventional retail poultry meat Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Carcass Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 60 22 None None None None 95.000
20309 20309 20019 None 13009 10.1111/zph.12279 Salaheen2016 Ecological Dynamics of Campylobacter in Integrated Mixed Crop-Livestock Farms and Its Prevalence and Survival Ability in Post-Harvest Products United States of America Observational 11252 11252 Production type Organic retail poultry meat vs conventional retail poultry meat Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Carcass Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter Combination False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 60 22 None None None None 95.000
20310 20310 20019 None 13009 10.1111/zph.12279 Salaheen2016 Ecological Dynamics of Campylobacter in Integrated Mixed Crop-Livestock Farms and Its Prevalence and Survival Ability in Post-Harvest Products United States of America Observational 11252 11252 Production type Organic retail poultry meat vs conventional retail poultry meat Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Carcass Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Combination False None False 26 None 3 None None None None None 60 22 None None None None 95.000
20311 20311 20019 None 13009 10.1111/zph.12279 Salaheen2016 Ecological Dynamics of Campylobacter in Integrated Mixed Crop-Livestock Farms and Its Prevalence and Survival Ability in Post-Harvest Products United States of America Observational 11252 11252 Production type Organic retail poultry meat vs conventional retail poultry meat Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Carcass Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 60 22 None None None None 95.000
20312 20312 20019 None 13009 10.1111/zph.12279 Salaheen2016 Ecological Dynamics of Campylobacter in Integrated Mixed Crop-Livestock Farms and Its Prevalence and Survival Ability in Post-Harvest Products United States of America Observational 11252 11252 Production type Organic retail poultry meat vs conventional retail poultry meat Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Carcass Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 60 22 None None None None 95.000
20313 20313 20019 None 13009 10.1111/zph.12279 Salaheen2016 Ecological Dynamics of Campylobacter in Integrated Mixed Crop-Livestock Farms and Its Prevalence and Survival Ability in Post-Harvest Products United States of America Observational 11252 11252 Production type Organic retail poultry meat vs conventional retail poultry meat Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Carcass Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 2 None 4 None None None None None 60 22 None None None None 95.000
20314 20314 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11253 11253 Meat chilling type Whole-carcass broilers processed in immersion-chilling vs air-chilling air-chilling immersion-chilling Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Carcass Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 33.30 None 60.00 None 150 150 None None None None 95.000
20315 20315 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11254 11254 Meat chilling type Whole-carcass broilers processed in immersion-chilling vs air-chilling (*cephalothin is the spelling used in the paper) air-chilling immersion-chilling Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Carcass First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 60.00 None 66.70 None 150 150 None None None None 95.000
20316 20316 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11254 11254 Meat chilling type Whole-carcass broilers processed in immersion-chilling vs air-chilling (*cephalothin is the spelling used in the paper) air-chilling immersion-chilling Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Carcass Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 40.00 None 66.70 None 150 150 None None None None 95.000
20317 20317 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11254 11254 Meat chilling type Whole-carcass broilers processed in immersion-chilling vs air-chilling (*cephalothin is the spelling used in the paper) air-chilling immersion-chilling Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Carcass Macrolides erythromycin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 150 150 None None None None 95.000
20318 20318 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11254 11254 Meat chilling type Whole-carcass broilers processed in immersion-chilling vs air-chilling (*cephalothin is the spelling used in the paper) air-chilling immersion-chilling Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Carcass Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 80.00 None 86.70 None 150 150 None None None None 95.000
20319 20319 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11254 11254 Meat chilling type Whole-carcass broilers processed in immersion-chilling vs air-chilling (*cephalothin is the spelling used in the paper) air-chilling immersion-chilling Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Carcass Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 9.10 None 50.00 None 150 150 None None None None 95.000
20320 20320 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11254 11254 Meat chilling type Whole-carcass broilers processed in immersion-chilling vs air-chilling (*cephalothin is the spelling used in the paper) air-chilling immersion-chilling Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Carcass Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 18.20 None 58.30 None 150 150 None None None None 95.000
20321 20321 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11254 11254 Meat chilling type Whole-carcass broilers processed in immersion-chilling vs air-chilling (*cephalothin is the spelling used in the paper) air-chilling immersion-chilling Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Carcass Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 0.00 None 8.30 None 150 150 None None None None 95.000
20322 20322 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11254 11254 Meat chilling type Whole-carcass broilers processed in immersion-chilling vs air-chilling (*cephalothin is the spelling used in the paper) air-chilling immersion-chilling Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Carcass Quinolones grepafloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 9.10 None 41.70 None 150 150 None None None None 95.000
20323 20323 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11254 11254 Meat chilling type Whole-carcass broilers processed in immersion-chilling vs air-chilling (*cephalothin is the spelling used in the paper) air-chilling immersion-chilling Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Carcass Quinolones levofloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 18.20 None 41.70 None 150 150 None None None None 95.000
20324 20324 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11254 11254 Meat chilling type Whole-carcass broilers processed in immersion-chilling vs air-chilling (*cephalothin is the spelling used in the paper) air-chilling immersion-chilling Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Carcass Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 9.10 None 50.00 None 150 150 None None None None 95.000
20325 20325 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11254 11254 Meat chilling type Whole-carcass broilers processed in immersion-chilling vs air-chilling (*cephalothin is the spelling used in the paper) air-chilling immersion-chilling Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Carcass Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 18.20 None 41.70 None 150 150 None None None None 95.000
20326 20326 20020 None 13051 10.4315/0362-028x-65.6.948 Sanchez2002 Microbial profile and antibiotic susceptibility of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella spp. in broilers processed in air-chilled and immersion-chilled environments United States of America Observational 11254 11254 Meat chilling type Whole-carcass broilers processed in immersion-chilling vs air-chilling (*cephalothin is the spelling used in the paper) air-chilling immersion-chilling Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table Carcass Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 90.90 None 16.70 None 150 150 None None None None 95.000
20327 20327 20023 None 13525 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.020 Soonthornchaikul2006 Resistance to three antimicrobial agents of Campylobacter isolated from organically- and intensively-reared chickens purchased from retail outlets United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 11258 11258 Production type Pre-packaged supermarket organically-reared chicken vs pre-packaged supermarket intensively-reared chicken (chicken carcass) organically-reared intensively-reared Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 8.70 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
20329 20329 20023 None 13525 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.020 Soonthornchaikul2006 Resistance to three antimicrobial agents of Campylobacter isolated from organically- and intensively-reared chickens purchased from retail outlets United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 11258 11258 Production type Pre-packaged supermarket organically-reared chicken vs pre-packaged supermarket intensively-reared chicken (chicken carcass) organically-reared intensively-reared Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
20330 20330 20023 None 13525 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.020 Soonthornchaikul2006 Resistance to three antimicrobial agents of Campylobacter isolated from organically- and intensively-reared chickens purchased from retail outlets United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 11258 11258 Production type Pre-packaged supermarket organically-reared chicken vs pre-packaged supermarket intensively-reared chicken (chicken carcass) organically-reared intensively-reared Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
20331 20331 20023 None 13525 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.020 Soonthornchaikul2006 Resistance to three antimicrobial agents of Campylobacter isolated from organically- and intensively-reared chickens purchased from retail outlets United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 11255 11255 Packaging type Unpackaged butcher intensively-reared chicken vs pre-packaged supermarket intensively-reared chicken (chicken carcass) Unpackaged butcher pre-packaged supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
20332 20332 20023 None 13525 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.020 Soonthornchaikul2006 Resistance to three antimicrobial agents of Campylobacter isolated from organically- and intensively-reared chickens purchased from retail outlets United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 11255 11255 Packaging type Unpackaged butcher intensively-reared chicken vs pre-packaged supermarket intensively-reared chicken (chicken carcass) Unpackaged butcher pre-packaged supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
20333 20333 20023 None 13525 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.020 Soonthornchaikul2006 Resistance to three antimicrobial agents of Campylobacter isolated from organically- and intensively-reared chickens purchased from retail outlets United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 11255 11255 Packaging type Unpackaged butcher intensively-reared chicken vs pre-packaged supermarket intensively-reared chicken (chicken carcass) Unpackaged butcher pre-packaged supermarket Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Not Specified False None False None None None None 26.70 None 8.70 None 30 30 None None None None 95.000
20341 20341 20026 None 13726 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2005.00890.x Takahashi2005 Emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter jejuni in chickens exposed to enrofloxacin treatment at the inherent dosage licensed in Japan Japan Experimental 11265 11265 Enrofloxacin use (study 2) 10^7 and 10&8 cfu/ml dose of C. jejuni ATCC 33560T at 18 and 23 days old and then 50 ppm enrofloxacin on day 32 vs control (between groups) 50ppm enrofloxacin day 28 no enrofloxacin day 28 Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 100.00 None 0.00 None 10 10 None None None None 95.000
20342 20342 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11276 11276 Production type Organic vs conventional chickens *extracted using plot digitizer* Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 68 28 None None None None 95.000
20343 20343 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11276 11276 Production type Organic vs conventional chickens *extracted using plot digitizer* Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 71 18 None None None None 95.000
20344 20344 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11276 11276 Production type Organic vs conventional chickens *extracted using plot digitizer* Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 71 18 None None None None 95.000
20345 20345 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11276 11276 Production type Organic vs conventional chickens *extracted using plot digitizer* Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 10.00 None 29.00 None 68 28 None None None None 95.000
20346 20346 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11276 11276 Production type Organic vs conventional chickens *extracted using plot digitizer* Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 21.00 None 33.00 None 68 28 None None None None 95.000
20347 20347 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11276 11276 Production type Organic vs conventional chickens *extracted using plot digitizer* Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 74.00 None 54.00 None 68 28 None None None None 95.000
20349 20349 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11276 11276 Production type Organic vs conventional chickens *extracted using plot digitizer* Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 90.00 None 72.00 None 71 18 None None None None 95.000
20350 20350 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11276 11276 Production type Organic vs conventional chickens *extracted using plot digitizer* Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False None None None None 80.00 None 44.00 None 71 18 None None None None 95.000
20353 20353 20035 None 9756 10.1089/fpd.2008.0171 Han2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. in Louisiana retail chickens after the enrofloxacin ban United States of America Observational 11291 11291 Production type Conventional brand chicken vs organic brand chicken *extracted using plot digitizer* Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 0.00 None 8.00 None 53 141 None None None None 95.000
20354 20354 20035 None 9756 10.1089/fpd.2008.0171 Han2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. in Louisiana retail chickens after the enrofloxacin ban United States of America Observational 11291 11291 Production type Conventional brand chicken vs organic brand chicken *extracted using plot digitizer* Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 10.00 None 24.00 None 53 141 None None None None 95.000
20355 20355 20035 None 9756 10.1089/fpd.2008.0171 Han2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. in Louisiana retail chickens after the enrofloxacin ban United States of America Observational 11291 11291 Production type Conventional brand chicken vs organic brand chicken *extracted using plot digitizer* Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 53 141 None None None None 95.000
20356 20356 20035 None 9756 10.1089/fpd.2008.0171 Han2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. in Louisiana retail chickens after the enrofloxacin ban United States of America Observational 11291 11291 Production type Conventional brand chicken vs organic brand chicken *extracted using plot digitizer* Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter Combination False None False None None None None 37.00 None 29.00 None 53 141 None None None None 95.000
20357 20357 20035 None 9756 10.1089/fpd.2008.0171 Han2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. in Louisiana retail chickens after the enrofloxacin ban United States of America Observational 11291 11291 Production type Conventional brand chicken vs organic brand chicken *extracted using plot digitizer* Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 0.00 None 10.00 None 41 69 None None None None 95.000
20358 20358 20035 None 9756 10.1089/fpd.2008.0171 Han2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. in Louisiana retail chickens after the enrofloxacin ban United States of America Observational 11291 11291 Production type Conventional brand chicken vs organic brand chicken *extracted using plot digitizer* Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 12.00 None 29.00 None 41 69 None None None None 95.000
20359 20359 20035 None 9756 10.1089/fpd.2008.0171 Han2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. in Louisiana retail chickens after the enrofloxacin ban United States of America Observational 11291 11291 Production type Conventional brand chicken vs organic brand chicken *extracted using plot digitizer* Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 41 69 None None None None 95.000
20360 20360 20035 None 9756 10.1089/fpd.2008.0171 Han2009 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. in Louisiana retail chickens after the enrofloxacin ban United States of America Observational 11291 11291 Production type Conventional brand chicken vs organic brand chicken *extracted using plot digitizer* Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Carcass Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 44.00 None 31.00 None 41 69 None None None None 95.000
20361 20361 20026 None 13726 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2005.00890.x Takahashi2005 Emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter jejuni in chickens exposed to enrofloxacin treatment at the inherent dosage licensed in Japan Japan Experimental 11266 11266 Enrofloxacin use (study 2) 10^7 and 10^8 cfu/ml dose of C. jejuni ATCC 33560T at 18 and 23 days old and then after 50 ppm enrofloxacin on day 32 (within groups) 50ppm enrofloxacin day 28 before 50ppm enrofloxacin Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 100.00 None 0.00 None 10 10 None None None None 95.000
20362 20362 20026 None 13726 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2005.00890.x Takahashi2005 Emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter jejuni in chickens exposed to enrofloxacin treatment at the inherent dosage licensed in Japan Japan Experimental 11263 11263 Enrofloxacin use (study 1) 10^6 cfu/ml dose of C. jejuni ATCC 33560T at 17 daysold and then 50 ppm enrofloxacin on day 24 vs control (between groups) 50ppm enrofloxacin day 28 no enrofloxacin day 28 Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 10 10 None None None None 95.000
20363 20363 20026 None 13726 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2005.00890.x Takahashi2005 Emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter jejuni in chickens exposed to enrofloxacin treatment at the inherent dosage licensed in Japan Japan Experimental 11264 11264 Enrofloxacin use (study 1) 10^6 cfu/ml dose of C. jejuni ATCC 33560T at 17 daysold and then 50 ppm enrofloxacin on day 24, pre and post enrofloxacin (within groups) 50ppm enrofloxacin day 28 before 50ppm enrofloxacin Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 10 10 None None None None 95.000
20364 20364 20024 None 13575 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04734.x Stapleton2010 Selecting for development of fluoroquinolone resistance in a Campylobacter jejuni strain 81116 in chickens using various enrofloxacin treatment protocols United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 11260 11260 Enrofloxacin use Comparison of ciprofloxacin resistance based on amount of enrofloxacin use groups after 48 hours of use (experiment 1) 250 ppm enrofloxacin 50 ppm enrofloxacin Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 68 None 147 None None None None None 96 216 None None None None 95.000
20367 20367 20030 None 9079 10.1093/jac/dkp277 Elviss2009 Amoxicillin therapy of poultry flocks: Effect upon the selection of amoxicillin-resistant commensal Campylobacter spp United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 11280 11280 Amoxicillin Use Flock 1: 5100 free-range broilers sampled at 50 days old, given amoxicillin therapy (15 mg/kg/day) for three days, samples collected 1 week post treatment (birds sent to slaughter) compared to before treatment During Treatment Pre Treatment Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 2 None 2 None None None None None 2 2 None None None None 95.000
20368 20368 20030 None 9079 10.1093/jac/dkp277 Elviss2009 Amoxicillin therapy of poultry flocks: Effect upon the selection of amoxicillin-resistant commensal Campylobacter spp United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 11282 11282 Amoxicillin Use Flock 3: Barn-reared layer flock of 5600 birds sampled at 119 days old given amoxicillin therapy (15 mg/kg/day) for three days, samples collected 4 weeks post treatment compared to before treatment After Treatment Pre Treatment Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 12 None 10 None None None None None 17 17 None None None None 95.000
20369 20369 20030 None 9079 10.1093/jac/dkp277 Elviss2009 Amoxicillin therapy of poultry flocks: Effect upon the selection of amoxicillin-resistant commensal Campylobacter spp United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 11281 11281 Amoxicillin Use Flock 2: 50 birds in an experimental condition brought onsite at 21 days from a commercial free-range organic broiler flock, received 15 mg/kg/day for 3 days of amoxicillin samples collected 4 weeks post treatment compared to before treatment After Treatment Pre Treatment Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 0 None 8 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None 95.000
20370 20370 20030 None 9079 10.1093/jac/dkp277 Elviss2009 Amoxicillin therapy of poultry flocks: Effect upon the selection of amoxicillin-resistant commensal Campylobacter spp United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 11283 11283 Amoxicillin Use Flock 4: 28 birds in an experimental condition brought onsite at 22 days of age from a commerical free-range broiler flock, 14 birds received 15 mg/kg/day the other 14 were housed independently and were untreated. Data from week 4 used for both Amoxicillin Use Control Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter Combination False None False 12 None 10 None None None None None 12 10 None None None None 95.000
20371 20371 20024 None 13575 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04734.x Stapleton2010 Selecting for development of fluoroquinolone resistance in a Campylobacter jejuni strain 81116 in chickens using various enrofloxacin treatment protocols United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 11259 11259 Enrofloxacin use Comparison of ciprofloxacin resistance based on amount of enrofloxacin use groups after 48 hours of use (experiment 1) 125 ppm enrofloxacin 50 ppm enrofloxacin Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 222 None 147 None None None None None 292 216 None None None None 95.000
20373 20373 20024 None 13575 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04734.x Stapleton2010 Selecting for development of fluoroquinolone resistance in a Campylobacter jejuni strain 81116 in chickens using various enrofloxacin treatment protocols United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 11261 11261 Enrofloxacin use Comparison of ciprofloxacin resistance based on amount of enrofloxacin use groups after 48 hours of use (experiment 2) (125 ppm and 250 ppm) enrofloxacin 12 ppm enrofloxacin Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 99.00 None 34.00 None 146 210 None None None None 95.000
20374 20374 20024 None 13575 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04734.x Stapleton2010 Selecting for development of fluoroquinolone resistance in a Campylobacter jejuni strain 81116 in chickens using various enrofloxacin treatment protocols United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Experimental 11262 11262 Enrofloxacin use Comparison of ciprofloxacin resistance based on amount of enrofloxacin use groups after 48 hours of use (experiment 2) (25 ppm and 50 ppm) enrofloxacin 12 ppm enrofloxacin Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False None None None None 50.00 None 34.00 None 317 210 None None None None 95.000
20375 20375 20006 None 11171 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014 Li2018 The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs China Observational 11135 11135 Animal Health Resistance outcome = mcr-1 gene. Resistance of AMU of different antimicrobials for healthy vs E. coli diseased pigs Not healthy Healthy Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None See gene column MCR-1 Escherichia coli False None False 46 None 32 None None None None None 102 204 None None None None 95.000
20376 20376 10259 None 8187 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.02.017 Cameron.Veas_2016_VeteJour Shedding of cephalosporin resistant Escherichia coli in pigs from conventional farms after early treatment with antimicrobials Spain None 10787 10787 Tulathromycin Use Tulathromycin, administered via single IM injection, at 2.5 mg/kg of bw at 7 days of age, as Draxxin. Sampled just before departure to abattoir (~180 days of age), aggregated across all 4 farms. Tulathromycin Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 22 None 13 None None None None None 135 87 None None None None 95.000
20377 20377 10259 None 8187 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.02.017 Cameron.Veas_2016_VeteJour Shedding of cephalosporin resistant Escherichia coli in pigs from conventional farms after early treatment with antimicrobials Spain None 10785 10785 Ceftiofur Use Ceftiofur, administered via single IM injection, at 5 mg/kg bw at 7 days of age, as Naxcel. Sampled just before departure to abattoir (~180 days of age), aggregated across all 4 farms. Ceftiofur Use No Use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 18 None 1 None None None None None 119 55 None None None None 95.000
20378 20378 10315 None 11965 Nair_2018_CanaVeteJour A clinical trial investigating the impact of in-feed flavophospholipol on Salmonella shedding and antimicrobial resistance in pigs Canada Experimental 10935 10935 Flavophospholipol use 4 ppm in feed (grow-finish pigs) for 10 weeks. Week 4 is latest data presented for Salmonella. Pigs obtained from farm w/history of salmonellosis. Referent group AMR+ = 0.98. Flavophospholipol use No use Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella None False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 5 7 None None None None 95.000
30000 30000 10238 None 7425 10.1128/AEM.00503-13 Amachawadi_2013_AppandEnvMic Occurrence of the transferable copper resistance gene tcrB among fecal Enterococci of U.S. feedlot cattle fed copper-supplemented diets United States of America Experimental 10704 10704 Copper supplementation Enterococcal isolates from cattle fed 100 mg/kg dietary copper in the diet (10X normal). Data are prevalence for copper resistance gene tcrB. Day 116 Only Copper (100 mg/kg) Control (10 mg/kg dietary copper) Cattle None None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate None None None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False 14 None 2 None None None None None 192 192 None None None None 95.000
30001 30001 10348 None 7431 10.1111/jam.12790 Amachawadi_2015_JoofApMi Effects of in-feed copper and tylosin supplementations on copper and antimicrobial resistance in faecal enterococci of feedlot cattle United States of America Experimental 11027 11027 Copper supplementation Prevalence of tcrB. Control: copper sulphate at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin. Case: Copper at 100 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin Copper at 100 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin copper sulphate at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Antidotes copper sulfate None Enterococcus faecium False None False 7 None 4 None None None None None 200 200 None None None None 95.000
30002 30002 10366 None 7859 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00483 Beukers_2015_FrinMi Effect of in-feed administration and withdrawal of tylosin phosphate on antibiotic resistance in enterococci isolated from feedlot steers Canada Experimental 11071 11071 Tylosin use Control cattle (No antibiotics) and cattle fed Tylosin Phosphate (11ppm) fed contunuously for 197 days, withdrawn 28 days prior to slaughter (T11). Data are prevalence from erythromycin resistant media. T11 (11 ppm tylosin) CON (no tylosin fed) Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 7.00 None 7.00 None 50 50 None None None None 95.000
30003 30003 10004 None 10250 10.2527/jas.2007-0091 Jacob2008 Effects of feeding wet corn distillers grains with solubles with or without monensin and tylosin on the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of fecal foodborne pathogenic and commensal bacteria in feedlot cattle United States of America Experimental 10008 10008 Monensin use Cattle fed feed additive monensin (Rumensin 300mg/animal/day) Fed monensin Fed no antibiotics Cattle Beef Heifers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 66.70 None 36.80 None 96 96 None None None None 95.000
30004 30004 10004 None 10250 10.2527/jas.2007-0091 Jacob2008 Effects of feeding wet corn distillers grains with solubles with or without monensin and tylosin on the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of fecal foodborne pathogenic and commensal bacteria in feedlot cattle United States of America Experimental 10007 10007 Monensin & Tylosin use Cattle fed feed additives monensin (Rumensin 300mg/animal/day) + tylosin (Tylan 90mg/animal/day) Fed monensin + tylosin Fed no antibiotics Cattle Beef Heifers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 75.00 None 36.80 None 96 96 None None None None 95.000
30005 30005 10004 None 10250 10.2527/jas.2007-0091 Jacob2008 Effects of feeding wet corn distillers grains with solubles with or without monensin and tylosin on the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of fecal foodborne pathogenic and commensal bacteria in feedlot cattle United States of America Experimental 10008 10008 Monensin use Cattle fed feed additive monensin (Rumensin 300mg/animal/day) Fed monensin Fed no antibiotics Cattle Beef Heifers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 66.70 None 36.80 None 96 96 None None None None 95.000
30006 30006 10004 None 10250 10.2527/jas.2007-0091 Jacob2008 Effects of feeding wet corn distillers grains with solubles with or without monensin and tylosin on the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of fecal foodborne pathogenic and commensal bacteria in feedlot cattle United States of America Experimental 10007 10007 Monensin & Tylosin use Cattle fed feed additives monensin (Rumensin 300mg/animal/day) + tylosin (Tylan 90mg/animal/day) Fed monensin + tylosin Fed no antibiotics Cattle Beef Heifers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 75.00 None 36.80 None 96 96 None None None None 95.000
30008 30008 10238 None 7425 10.1128/AEM.00503-13 Amachawadi_2013_AppandEnvMic Occurrence of the transferable copper resistance gene tcrB among fecal Enterococci of U.S. feedlot cattle fed copper-supplemented diets United States of America Experimental 10705 10705 Copper supplementation Enterococcal isolates from cattle fed 100 mg/kg dietary copper in the diet (10X normal). Data are prevalence for erythromycin resistance gene erm(B). Day 116 Only Copper (100 mg/kg) Control (10 mg/kg dietary copper) Cattle Beef Heifers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate None None None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False 82 None 116 None None None None None 192 192 None None None None 95.000
30009 30009 10238 None 7425 10.1128/AEM.00503-13 Amachawadi_2013_AppandEnvMic Occurrence of the transferable copper resistance gene tcrB among fecal Enterococci of U.S. feedlot cattle fed copper-supplemented diets United States of America Experimental 10706 10706 Copper supplementation Enterococcal isolates from cattle fed 100 mg/kg dietary copper in the diet (10X normal). Data are prevalence for tetracycline resistance gene tet(M). Day 116 Only Copper (100 mg/kg) Control (10 mg/kg dietary copper) Cattle Beef Heifers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate None None None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False 106 None 134 None None None None None 192 192 None None None None 95.000
30010 30010 30001 None 30001 10.3389/fvets.2020.00090 Davedow2020 Investigation of a Reduction in Tylosin on the Prevalence of Liver Abscesses and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococci in Feedlot Cattle Canada Experimental 11293 11293 In-feed Tylosin Cattle were fed 11ppm tylosin phosphate in feed for the first 125 days of the 161-days feeding period (FIRST-78%). Samples were cultured on a combination of both non-selective and erythromycin selective media. Tylosin Phosphate: First 78% Days Tylosin Phosphate: continuously Cattle Beef Heifers and Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False 2 None 2 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None 95.000
30011 30011 30001 None 30001 10.3389/fvets.2020.00090 Davedow2020 Investigation of a Reduction in Tylosin on the Prevalence of Liver Abscesses and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococci in Feedlot Cattle Canada Experimental 11293 11293 In-feed Tylosin Cattle were fed 11ppm tylosin phosphate in feed for the first 125 days of the 161-days feeding period (FIRST-78%). Samples were cultured on a combination of both non-selective and erythromycin selective media. Tylosin Phosphate: First 78% Days Tylosin Phosphate: continuously Cattle Beef Heifers and Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False 17 None 19 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None 95.000
30012 30012 30001 None 30001 10.3389/fvets.2020.00090 Davedow2020 Investigation of a Reduction in Tylosin on the Prevalence of Liver Abscesses and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococci in Feedlot Cattle Canada Experimental 11293 11293 In-feed Tylosin Cattle were fed 11ppm tylosin phosphate in feed for the first 125 days of the 161-days feeding period (FIRST-78%). Samples were cultured on a combination of both non-selective and erythromycin selective media. Tylosin Phosphate: First 78% Days Tylosin Phosphate: continuously Cattle Beef Heifers and Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False 17 None 19 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None 95.000
30013 30013 30001 None 30001 10.3389/fvets.2020.00090 Davedow2020 Investigation of a Reduction in Tylosin on the Prevalence of Liver Abscesses and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococci in Feedlot Cattle Canada Experimental 11293 11293 In-feed Tylosin Cattle were fed 11ppm tylosin phosphate in feed for the first 125 days of the 161-days feeding period (FIRST-78%). Samples were cultured on a combination of both non-selective and erythromycin selective media. Tylosin Phosphate: First 78% Days Tylosin Phosphate: continuously Cattle Beef Heifers and Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines doxycycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False 1 None 2 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None 95.000
30014 30014 30001 None 30001 10.3389/fvets.2020.00090 Davedow2020 Investigation of a Reduction in Tylosin on the Prevalence of Liver Abscesses and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococci in Feedlot Cattle Canada Experimental 11293 11293 In-feed Tylosin Cattle were fed 11ppm tylosin phosphate in feed for the first 125 days of the 161-days feeding period (FIRST-78%). Samples were cultured on a combination of both non-selective and erythromycin selective media. Tylosin Phosphate: First 78% Days Tylosin Phosphate: continuously Cattle Beef Heifers and Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tigecycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None 95.000
30015 30015 30001 None 30001 10.3389/fvets.2020.00090 Davedow2020 Investigation of a Reduction in Tylosin on the Prevalence of Liver Abscesses and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococci in Feedlot Cattle Canada Experimental 11293 11293 In-feed Tylosin Cattle were fed 11ppm tylosin phosphate in feed for the first 125 days of the 161-days feeding period (FIRST-78%). Samples were cultured on a combination of both non-selective and erythromycin selective media. Tylosin Phosphate: First 78% Days Tylosin Phosphate: continuously Cattle Beef Heifers and Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials linezolid None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None 95.000
30016 30016 30001 None 30001 10.3389/fvets.2020.00090 Davedow2020 Investigation of a Reduction in Tylosin on the Prevalence of Liver Abscesses and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococci in Feedlot Cattle Canada Experimental 11293 11293 In-feed Tylosin Cattle were fed 11ppm tylosin phosphate in feed for the first 125 days of the 161-days feeding period (FIRST-78%). Samples were cultured on a combination of both non-selective and erythromycin selective media. Tylosin Phosphate: First 78% Days Tylosin Phosphate: continuously Cattle Beef Heifers and Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None 95.000
30017 30017 30001 None 30001 10.3389/fvets.2020.00090 Davedow2020 Investigation of a Reduction in Tylosin on the Prevalence of Liver Abscesses and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococci in Feedlot Cattle Canada Experimental 11293 11293 In-feed Tylosin Cattle were fed 11ppm tylosin phosphate in feed for the first 125 days of the 161-days feeding period (FIRST-78%). Samples were cultured on a combination of both non-selective and erythromycin selective media. Tylosin Phosphate: First 78% Days Tylosin Phosphate: continuously Cattle Beef Heifers and Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None 95.000
30018 30018 30001 None 30001 10.3389/fvets.2020.00090 Davedow2020 Investigation of a Reduction in Tylosin on the Prevalence of Liver Abscesses and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococci in Feedlot Cattle Canada Experimental 11294 11294 In-feed Tylosin Cattle were fed 11ppm tylosin phosphate in feed for the last 120 days of the 161-days feeding period (LAST-75%). Samples were cultured on a combination of both non-selective and erythromycin selective media. Tylosin Phosphate: Last 75% Days Tylosin Phosphate: continuously Cattle Beef Heifers and Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False 1 None 2 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None 95.000
30019 30019 30001 None 30001 10.3389/fvets.2020.00090 Davedow2020 Investigation of a Reduction in Tylosin on the Prevalence of Liver Abscesses and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococci in Feedlot Cattle Canada Experimental 11294 11294 In-feed Tylosin Cattle were fed 11ppm tylosin phosphate in feed for the last 120 days of the 161-days feeding period (LAST-75%). Samples were cultured on a combination of both non-selective and erythromycin selective media. Tylosin Phosphate: Last 75% Days Tylosin Phosphate: continuously Cattle Beef Heifers and Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False 18 None 19 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None 95.000
30020 30020 30001 None 30001 10.3389/fvets.2020.00090 Davedow2020 Investigation of a Reduction in Tylosin on the Prevalence of Liver Abscesses and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococci in Feedlot Cattle Canada Experimental 11294 11294 In-feed Tylosin Cattle were fed 11ppm tylosin phosphate in feed for the last 120 days of the 161-days feeding period (LAST-75%). Samples were cultured on a combination of both non-selective and erythromycin selective media. Tylosin Phosphate: Last 75% Days Tylosin Phosphate: continuously Cattle Beef Heifers and Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False 18 None 19 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None 95.000
30021 30021 30001 None 30001 10.3389/fvets.2020.00090 Davedow2020 Investigation of a Reduction in Tylosin on the Prevalence of Liver Abscesses and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococci in Feedlot Cattle Canada Experimental 11294 11294 In-feed Tylosin Cattle were fed 11ppm tylosin phosphate in feed for the last 120 days of the 161-days feeding period (LAST-75%). Samples were cultured on a combination of both non-selective and erythromycin selective media. Tylosin Phosphate: Last 75% Days Tylosin Phosphate: continuously Cattle Beef Heifers and Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines doxycycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False 1 None 2 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None 95.000
30022 30022 30001 None 30001 10.3389/fvets.2020.00090 Davedow2020 Investigation of a Reduction in Tylosin on the Prevalence of Liver Abscesses and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococci in Feedlot Cattle Canada Experimental 11294 11294 In-feed Tylosin Cattle were fed 11ppm tylosin phosphate in feed for the last 120 days of the 161-days feeding period (LAST-75%). Samples were cultured on a combination of both non-selective and erythromycin selective media. Tylosin Phosphate: Last 75% Days Tylosin Phosphate: continuously Cattle Beef Heifers and Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tigecycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None 95.000
30023 30023 30001 None 30001 10.3389/fvets.2020.00090 Davedow2020 Investigation of a Reduction in Tylosin on the Prevalence of Liver Abscesses and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococci in Feedlot Cattle Canada Experimental 11294 11294 In-feed Tylosin Cattle were fed 11ppm tylosin phosphate in feed for the last 120 days of the 161-days feeding period (LAST-75%). Samples were cultured on a combination of both non-selective and erythromycin selective media. Tylosin Phosphate: Last 75% Days Tylosin Phosphate: continuously Cattle Beef Heifers and Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials linezolid None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None 95.000
30024 30024 30001 None 30001 10.3389/fvets.2020.00090 Davedow2020 Investigation of a Reduction in Tylosin on the Prevalence of Liver Abscesses and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococci in Feedlot Cattle Canada Experimental 11294 11294 In-feed Tylosin Cattle were fed 11ppm tylosin phosphate in feed for the last 120 days of the 161-days feeding period (LAST-75%). Samples were cultured on a combination of both non-selective and erythromycin selective media. Tylosin Phosphate: Last 75% Days Tylosin Phosphate: continuously Cattle Beef Heifers and Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None 95.000
30025 30025 30001 None 30001 10.3389/fvets.2020.00090 Davedow2020 Investigation of a Reduction in Tylosin on the Prevalence of Liver Abscesses and Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococci in Feedlot Cattle Canada Experimental 11294 11294 In-feed Tylosin Cattle were fed 11ppm tylosin phosphate in feed for the last 120 days of the 161-days feeding period (LAST-75%). Samples were cultured on a combination of both non-selective and erythromycin selective media. Tylosin Phosphate: Last 75% Days Tylosin Phosphate: continuously Cattle Beef Heifers and Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 20 None None None None 95.000
30026 30026 30003 None 30003 10.1093/jas/sky166 Mueller2018 Effects of intermittent feeding of tylosin phosphate during the finishing period on feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, antimicrobial resistance, and incidence and severity of liver abscesses in steers United States of America Experimental 11298 11298 In-feed Tylosin Received intermittent in-feed tylosin phosphate in a 1 week on, 2 week off pattern, throughout the feeding period, 118 days. Erythromycin-selective media was used. Tylosin phosphate feeding (Intermittent) No tylosin given Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 26.00 None 42.00 None None None None None None None 95.000
30027 30027 30003 None 30003 10.1093/jas/sky166 Mueller2018 Effects of intermittent feeding of tylosin phosphate during the finishing period on feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, antimicrobial resistance, and incidence and severity of liver abscesses in steers United States of America Experimental 11296 11296 In-feed Tylosin Received continuous in-feed tylosin phosphate, 118 days. Erythromycin-selective media was used. Tylosin phosphate feeding (Continuous) No tylosin given Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 24.00 None 42.00 None None None None None None None 95.000
30028 30028 30003 None 30003 10.1093/jas/sky166 Mueller2018 Effects of intermittent feeding of tylosin phosphate during the finishing period on feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, antimicrobial resistance, and incidence and severity of liver abscesses in steers United States of America Experimental 11297 11297 In-feed Tylosin Received intermittent in-feed tylosin phosphate in a 1 week on, 2 week off pattern (118 days). Tetracycline-selective media was used. Tylosin phosphate feeding (Intermittent) No tylosin given Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 64.00 None 33.00 None None None None None None None 95.000
30029 30029 30003 None 30003 10.1093/jas/sky166 Mueller2018 Effects of intermittent feeding of tylosin phosphate during the finishing period on feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, antimicrobial resistance, and incidence and severity of liver abscesses in steers United States of America Experimental 11295 11295 In-feed Tylosin Received continuous (118 day) in-feed tylosin phosphate. Tetracycline-selective media was used. Tylosin phosphate feeding (Continuous) No tylosin given Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 42.00 None 33.00 None None None None None None None 95.000
30030 30030 10223 None 7263 10.1089/mdr.2015.0259 Agga_2016_MicrDrugResi Antimicrobial-Resistant Fecal Bacteria from Ceftiofur-Treated and Nonantimicrobial-Treated Comingled Beef Cows at a Cow-Calf Operation United States of America Experimental 10646 10646 Ceftiofur Use Cows treated with ceftiofur. Samples were cultured on erythromycin-selective media. (Averaged across Birth Cohorts) Ceftiofur treated cows (birth cohorts pooled) Non-antimicrobial treated Cattle Beef Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Pooled Sample Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False 58 None 85 None None None None None 93 131 None None None None 95.000
30034 30034 10348 None 7431 10.1111/jam.12790 Amachawadi_2015_JoofApMi Effects of in-feed copper and tylosin supplementations on copper and antimicrobial resistance in faecal enterococci of feedlot cattle United States of America Experimental 11026 11026 Copper supplementation Control: copper sulphate at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin). Case: Copper at 100 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin. Data are prevalence of tylosin resistance gene erm(B). Copper at 100 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin copper sulphate at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 98 None 69 None None None None None 200 200 None None None None 95.000
30035 30035 10348 None 7431 10.1111/jam.12790 Amachawadi_2015_JoofApMi Effects of in-feed copper and tylosin supplementations on copper and antimicrobial resistance in faecal enterococci of feedlot cattle United States of America Experimental 11025 11025 Copper supplementation Control: copper sulphate at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin). Case: Copper at 100 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin. Data are prevalence of tetracycline resistance gene tet(M). Copper at 100 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin copper sulphate at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin) Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecium False None False 118 None 124 None None None None None 200 200 None None None None 95.000
30036 30036 10348 None 7431 10.1111/jam.12790 Amachawadi_2015_JoofApMi Effects of in-feed copper and tylosin supplementations on copper and antimicrobial resistance in faecal enterococci of feedlot cattle United States of America Experimental 11030 11030 Copper supplementation with Tylosin use Control: copper sulphate at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin). Case: Copper at 100 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and tylosin at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter. Data are prevalence of copper sulfate resistance gene tcrB. Copper at 100 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and tylosin at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter copper sulphate at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Antidotes copper sulfate None Enterococcus faecium False None False 17 None 4 None None None None None 200 200 None None None None 95.000
30037 30037 10348 None 7431 10.1111/jam.12790 Amachawadi_2015_JoofApMi Effects of in-feed copper and tylosin supplementations on copper and antimicrobial resistance in faecal enterococci of feedlot cattle United States of America Experimental 11029 11029 Copper supplementation with Tylosin use Control: copper sulphate at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin). Case: Copper at 100 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and tylosin at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter. Data are prevalence of tylosin resistance gene erm(B). opper at 100 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and tylosin at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter copper sulphate at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 103 None 69 None None None None None 200 200 None None None None 95.000
30038 30038 10348 None 7431 10.1111/jam.12790 Amachawadi_2015_JoofApMi Effects of in-feed copper and tylosin supplementations on copper and antimicrobial resistance in faecal enterococci of feedlot cattle United States of America Experimental 11028 11028 Copper supplementation with Tylosin use Control: copper sulphate at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin). Case: Copper at 100 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and tylosin at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter. Data are prevalence of tetracycline resistance gene tet(M). Copper at 100 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and tylosin at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter copper sulphate at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin) Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecium False None False 110 None 124 None None None None None 200 200 None None None None 95.000
30039 30039 10366 None 7859 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00483 Beukers_2015_FrinMi Effect of in-feed administration and withdrawal of tylosin phosphate on antibiotic resistance in enterococci isolated from feedlot steers Canada Experimental 11072 11072 Tylosin use Control cattle (No antibiotics) and cattle fed Tylosin Phosphate (11ppm) fed contunuously for 197 days, withdrawn 28 days prior to slaughter (T11). Data are prevalence from tylosin resistant media. T11 (11 ppm tylosin) CON (no tylosin fed) Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 30.00 None 20.00 None 50 50 None None None None 95.000
30040 30040 30004 None 30004 Chan2008 Investigation of multi-drug resistant microbes in retail meats United States of America Observational 11299 11299 Beef raising method Beef raised all natural vs conventional. Data were obtained using a VRE screen agar plate for vancomycin resistance. All natural Conventional Cattle Not Specified None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 3 9 None None None None 95.000
30041 30041 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10823 10823 Distiller's grain containing virginiamycin Day 49 Prevalence (%) of ermB detected in Enterococcus isolates cultured from cattle feddiets containing dried distiller’s grains containing 0 (Neg-Control) and 0.7 mg/kg virginiamycin VM 0.7 mg/kg No VM (negative control) Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate None None None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None 92.00 None 43.00 None 288 288 None None None None 95.000
30042 30042 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10824 10824 Distiller's grain containing virginiamycin Day 49 Prevalence (%) of ermB detected in Enterococcus isolates cultured from cattle feddiets containing dried distiller’s grains containing 0 (Neg-Control) and 8.9 mg/kg VM virginiamycin VM 8.9 mg/kg No VM (negative control) Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate None None None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None 80.00 None 43.00 None 288 288 None None None None 95.000
30043 30043 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10822 10822 Distiller's grain containing virginiamycin Day 49 Prevalence (%) of ermB detected in Enterococcus isolates cultured from cattle fed diets containing dried distiller’s grains containing 0 (Neg-Control) and 8% of the control DG + 0.06 mg/kg V-Max50 (VM; positive control virginiamycin) VM 0.06 mg/kg (positive control) No VM (negative control) Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate None None None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None 22.00 None 43.00 None 288 288 None None None None 95.000
30044 30044 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10829 10829 Distiller's grain containing virginiamycin Day 49 Prevalence (%) of vatE detected in Enterococcus isolates cultured from cattle feddiets containing dried distiller’s grains containing 0 (Neg-Control) and 0.7 mg/kg virginiamycin VM 0.7 mg/kg No VM (negative control) Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate None None None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None 76.00 None 71.00 None 288 288 None None None None 95.000
30045 30045 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10828 10828 Distiller's grain containing virginiamycin Day 49 Prevalence (%) of vatE detected in Enterococcus isolates cultured from cattle fed diets containing dried distiller’s grains containing 0 (Neg-Control) and 8.9 mg/kg virginiamycin VM 8.9 mg/kg No VM (negative control) Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate None None None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None 52.00 None 71.00 None 288 288 None None None None 95.000
30046 30046 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10830 10830 Distiller's grain containing virginiamycin Day 49 Prevalence (%) of vatE detected in Enterococcus isolates cultured from cattle feddiets containing dried distiller’s grains containing 0 (Neg-Control) and 8% of the control DG + 0.06 mg/kg V-Max50 (VM; positive control virginiamycin) VM 0.06 mg/kg (positive control) No VM (negative control) Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate None None None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None 67.00 None 71.00 None 288 288 None None None None 95.000
30047 30047 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10825 10825 Distiller's grain containing virginiamycin Day 49 Prevalence (%) of msrC detected in Enterococcus isolates cultured from cattle feddiets containing dried distiller’s grains containing 0 (Neg-Control) and 0.7 mg/kg virginiamycin VM 0.7 mg/kg Neg-Control Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate None None None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None 25.00 None 0.00 None 288 288 None None None None 95.000
30048 30048 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10826 10826 Distiller's grain containing virginiamycin Day 49 Prevalence (%) of msrC detected in Enterococcus isolates cultured from cattle feddiets containing dried distiller’s grains containing 0 (Neg-Control) and 8.9 mg/kg VM virginiamycin VM 0.7 mg/kg Neg-Control Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate None None None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None 40.00 None 0.00 None 288 288 None None None None 95.000
30049 30049 10137 None 14665 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00133 Zaheer2013 Effect of subtherapeutic vs. therapeutic administration of macrolides on antimicrobial resistance in Mannheimia haemolytica and enterococci isolated from beef cattle Canada Experimental 10389 10389 Macrolide use Use of macrolides in cattle; single SQ injection o (Tilmicosin, Tulathromycin) or in-feed (Tylosin). Erythromycin-resistance determined by presence of genes erm(A), erm(B), erm©, erm(F), erm(T), erm(X), mef(A). Tilmicosin Control- no antibiotics Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 21.00 None 1.00 None 100 100 None None None None 95.000
30050 30050 10137 None 14665 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00133 Zaheer2013 Effect of subtherapeutic vs. therapeutic administration of macrolides on antimicrobial resistance in Mannheimia haemolytica and enterococci isolated from beef cattle Canada Experimental 10388 10388 Macrolide use Use of macrolides in cattle; single SQ injection (Tilmicosin, Tulathromycin) or in-feed (Tylosin). Erythromycin-resistance determined by presence of genes erm(A), erm(B), erm©, erm(F), erm(T), erm(X), mef(A). Control: No Antibiotics Tulathromycin Control- no antibiotics Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 35.00 None 1.00 None None None None None None None 95.000
30051 30051 10137 None 14665 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00133 Zaheer2013 Effect of subtherapeutic vs. therapeutic administration of macrolides on antimicrobial resistance in Mannheimia haemolytica and enterococci isolated from beef cattle Canada Experimental 10387 10387 Macrolide use Use of macrolides in cattle; single SQ injection (Tilmicosin, Tulathromycin) or in-feed (Tylosin). Erythromycin-resistance determined by presence of genes erm(A), erm(B), erm©, erm(F), erm(T), erm(X), mef(A). Tylosin Control- no antibiotics Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 22.00 None 1.00 None None None None None None None 95.000
30052 30052 10138 None 14715 10.1089/fpd.2010.0562 Zhang2010 Contamination rates and antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from grass-fed labeled beef products United States of America Observational 10390 10390 Beef raising method Grass-fed beef products (vs. raised using conventional methods). Grass-fed Conventional Cattle Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Tetracyclines tigecycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 17.00 None 22 32 None None None None 95.000
30053 30053 10138 None 14715 10.1089/fpd.2010.0562 Zhang2010 Contamination rates and antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from grass-fed labeled beef products United States of America Observational 10391 10391 Beef raising method Grass-fed beef products (vs. raised using conventional methods). Grass-fed Conventional Cattle Not Specified None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 91.00 None 99.00 None 22 32 None None None None 95.000
30054 30054 10138 None 14715 10.1089/fpd.2010.0562 Zhang2010 Contamination rates and antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from grass-fed labeled beef products United States of America Observational 10391 10391 Beef raising method Grass-fed beef products (vs. raised using conventional methods). Grass-fed Conventional Cattle Not Specified None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 69.00 None 77.00 None 22 32 None None None None 95.000
30055 30055 10138 None 14715 10.1089/fpd.2010.0562 Zhang2010 Contamination rates and antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from grass-fed labeled beef products United States of America Observational 10391 10391 Beef raising method Grass-fed beef products (vs. raised using conventional methods). Grass-fed Conventional Cattle Not Specified None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Antibiotics bambermycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 22 32 None None None None 95.000
30056 30056 10138 None 14715 10.1089/fpd.2010.0562 Zhang2010 Contamination rates and antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from grass-fed labeled beef products United States of America Observational 10392 10392 Beef raising method Grass-fed beef products (vs. raised using conventional methods). AMR = penicillin Grass-fed Conventional Cattle Not Specified None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat None None None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 25.00 None 38.00 None 22 32 None None None None 95.000
30057 30057 10138 None 14715 10.1089/fpd.2010.0562 Zhang2010 Contamination rates and antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from grass-fed labeled beef products United States of America Observational 10391 10391 Beef raising method Grass-fed beef products (vs. raised using conventional methods). Grass-fed Conventional Cattle Not Specified None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Other antibacterials daptomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 25.00 None 22 32 None None None None 95.000
30058 30058 10138 None 14715 10.1089/fpd.2010.0562 Zhang2010 Contamination rates and antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from grass-fed labeled beef products United States of America Observational 10391 10391 Beef raising method Grass-fed beef products (vs. raised using conventional methods). Grass-fed Conventional Cattle Not Specified None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 30.00 None 50.00 None 22 32 None None None None 95.000
30059 30059 10138 None 14715 10.1089/fpd.2010.0562 Zhang2010 Contamination rates and antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from grass-fed labeled beef products United States of America Observational 10391 10391 Beef raising method Grass-fed beef products (vs. raised using conventional methods). Grass-fed Conventional Cattle Not Specified None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 5.00 None 22 32 None None None None 95.000
30060 30060 10138 None 14715 10.1089/fpd.2010.0562 Zhang2010 Contamination rates and antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from grass-fed labeled beef products United States of America Observational 10391 10391 Beef raising method Grass-fed beef products (vs. raised using conventional methods). Grass-fed Conventional Cattle Not Specified None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 18.00 None 19.00 None 22 32 None None None None 95.000
30061 30061 10138 None 14715 10.1089/fpd.2010.0562 Zhang2010 Contamination rates and antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from grass-fed labeled beef products United States of America Observational 10391 10391 Beef raising method Grass-fed beef products (vs. raised using conventional methods). Grass-fed Conventional Cattle Not Specified None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Other antibacterials linezolid None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 60.00 None 91.00 None 22 32 None None None None 95.000
30062 30062 10138 None 14715 10.1089/fpd.2010.0562 Zhang2010 Contamination rates and antimicrobial resistance in bacteria isolated from grass-fed labeled beef products United States of America Observational 10391 10391 Beef raising method Grass-fed beef products (vs. raised using conventional methods). Grass-fed Conventional Cattle Not Specified None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 0.00 None 9.00 None 22 32 None None None None 95.000
30064 30064 10209 None 9908 10.1093/jac/dkh508 Hershberger2005 Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin United States of America Observational 10599 10599 Antibiotic use Farms not using antibiotics in livestock (compared to conventional industry standard where antibiotics are used). Farms not using respective antibiotic class Farms using respective antibiotic class Cattle Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 72 None 3 None None None None None 134 3 None None None None 95.000
30065 30065 10209 None 9908 10.1093/jac/dkh508 Hershberger2005 Epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance in enterococci of animal origin United States of America Observational 10599 10599 Antibiotic use Farms not using antibiotics in livestock (compared to conventional industry standard where antibiotics are used). Farms not using respective antibiotic class Farms using respective antibiotic class Cattle Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False 1 None 15 None None None None None 114 15 None None None None 95.000
30066 30066 10036 None 11115 10.4315/0362-028x-67.7.1433 LeJeune2004 Microbiological quality of ground beef from conventionally-reared cattle and raised without antibiotics label claims United States of America Experimental 10083 10083 Raised without Antibiotics Beef products labeled with words (organic) to the effect that the cattle from which the beef was derived had not received any antimicrobial agents, compared to conventionally raised cattle with the use of antibiotics. Organic Conventional Cattle Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 73 77 None None None None 95.000
30067 30067 10088 None 12507 10.2460/ajvr.69.8.988 Platt2008 Antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria recovered from feedlot cattle administered chlortetracycline in feed United States of America Experimental 10243 10243 Chlortetracycline use Cattle fed cottonseed meal with or without chlortetracycline (22 mg/kg) added. (Data from days 8-12) Chlortetracycline in cottonseed meal Cottonseed meal only Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 65.00 None 18.00 None 100 100 None None None None 95.000
30068 30068 10088 None 12507 10.2460/ajvr.69.8.988 Platt2008 Antimicrobial susceptibility of enteric bacteria recovered from feedlot cattle administered chlortetracycline in feed United States of America Experimental 10242 10242 Chlortetracycline use Cattle fed cottonseed meal with or without chlortetracycline (22 mg/kg) added. (Data from days 14-19) Chlortetracycline in cottonseed meal Cottonseed meal only Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 44.00 None 9.00 None 100 100 None None None None 95.000
30069 30069 10128 None 14118 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-299 Vikram2018 Similar levels of antimicrobial resistance in u.S. food service ground beef products with and without a Raised without Antibiotics claim United States of America Observational 10372 10372 Beef raising method Beef products with organic or raised without antibiotics (RWA) label claims compared to conventionally (CONV) raised beef using antibiotics. Data from tetracycline-resistance selective media. Beef raised without antibiotics Conventional Cattle Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 91.10 None 94.80 None 179 191 None None None None 95.000
30070 30070 10128 None 14118 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-18-299 Vikram2018 Similar levels of antimicrobial resistance in u.S. food service ground beef products with and without a Raised without Antibiotics claim United States of America Observational 10371 10371 Beef raising method Beef products with organic or raised without antibiotics (RWA) label claims compared to conventionally (CONV) raised beef using antibiotics. Data from erythromycin-resistance selective media. Beef raised without antibiotics Conventional Cattle Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Retail Meat Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 23.50 None 27.80 None 179 191 None None None None 95.000
30071 30071 29999 None 29999 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-19-342 Schmidt2020 In-feed tylosin phosphate administration to feedlot cattle minimally affects antimicrobial resistance United States of America Experimental 11292 11292 In-feed Tylosin use Addition of tylosin phosphate in cattle feed. Data from erythromycin-resistance selective media. Tylosin Control (no tylosin) Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Pooled Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Not Specified False None False None None None None 97.60 None 57.10 None 41 42 None None None None 95.000
30072 30072 10348 None 7431 10.1111/jam.12790 Amachawadi_2015_JoofApMi Effects of in-feed copper and tylosin supplementations on copper and antimicrobial resistance in faecal enterococci of feedlot cattle United States of America Experimental 11023 11023 Tylosin Supplementation Prevalence of tcrB. Control: copper sulphate at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin). Case: Copper at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and tylosin at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter copper sulphate at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and tylosin at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter copper sulphate at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Antidotes copper sulfate None Enterococcus faecium False None False 9 None 4 None None None None None 200 200 None None None None 95.000
30073 30073 10348 None 7431 10.1111/jam.12790 Amachawadi_2015_JoofApMi Effects of in-feed copper and tylosin supplementations on copper and antimicrobial resistance in faecal enterococci of feedlot cattle United States of America Experimental 11024 11024 Tylosin Supplementation Prevalence of tet(M). Control: copper sulphate at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin). Case: Copper at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and tylosin at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter copper sulphate at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and tylosin at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter copper sulphate at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecium False None False 108 None 124 None None None None None 200 200 None None None None 95.000
30074 30074 10348 None 7431 10.1111/jam.12790 Amachawadi_2015_JoofApMi Effects of in-feed copper and tylosin supplementations on copper and antimicrobial resistance in faecal enterococci of feedlot cattle United States of America Experimental 11022 11022 Tylosin Supplementation Prevalence of ermB. Control: copper sulphate at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin). Case: Copper at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and tylosin at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter copper sulphate at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and tylosin at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter copper sulphate at 10 mg kg^-1 of feed dry matter and no tylosin Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 105 None 69 None None None None None 200 200 None None None None 95.000
30075 30075 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10827 10827 Distiller's grain containing virginiamycin Day 49 Prevalence (%) of msrC detected in Enterococcus isolates cultured from cattle feddiets containing dried distiller’s grains containing 0 (Neg-Control) and 8% of the control DG + 0.06 mg/kg V-Max50 (VM; positive control virginiamycin) VM 0.06 mg/kg (positive control) Neg-Control Cattle Beef Steers None None Feedlot Feedlot Prevalence Table Isolate None None None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None 12.00 None 0.00 None 288 288 None None None None 95.000
30076 30076 20033 None 9729 10.2460/javma.228.7.1074 Halbert2006a Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Campylobacter spp isolated from dairy cattle and farms managed organically and conventionally in the midwestern and northeastern United States United States of America Observational 11287 11287 Production Type Production Type Conventional Organic Dairy Cattle None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 0.10 None 0.00 None 686 186 None None None None 95.000
30077 30077 20033 None 9729 10.2460/javma.228.7.1074 Halbert2006a Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Campylobacter spp isolated from dairy cattle and farms managed organically and conventionally in the midwestern and northeastern United States United States of America Observational 11287 11287 Production Type Production Type Conventional Organic Dairy Cattle None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 8.60 None 7.10 None 686 168 None None None None 95.000
30078 30078 20033 None 9729 10.2460/javma.228.7.1074 Halbert2006a Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Campylobacter spp isolated from dairy cattle and farms managed organically and conventionally in the midwestern and northeastern United States United States of America Observational 11287 11287 Production Type Production Type Conventional Organic Dairy Cattle None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Macrolides azithromycin None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 1.30 None 1.10 None 1525 450 None None None None 95.000
30079 30079 20033 None 9729 10.2460/javma.228.7.1074 Halbert2006a Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Campylobacter spp isolated from dairy cattle and farms managed organically and conventionally in the midwestern and northeastern United States United States of America Observational 11287 11287 Production Type Production Type Conventional Organic Dairy Cattle None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 1.40 None 2.30 None 686 168 None None None None 95.000
30080 30080 20033 None 9729 10.2460/javma.228.7.1074 Halbert2006a Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Campylobacter spp isolated from dairy cattle and farms managed organically and conventionally in the midwestern and northeastern United States United States of America Observational 11287 11287 Production Type Production Type Conventional Organic Dairy Cattle None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 1.10 None 0.00 None 1525 450 None None None None 95.000
30081 30081 20033 None 9729 10.2460/javma.228.7.1074 Halbert2006a Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Campylobacter spp isolated from dairy cattle and farms managed organically and conventionally in the midwestern and northeastern United States United States of America Observational 11287 11287 Production Type Production Type Conventional Organic Dairy Cattle None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 1.10 None 0.90 None 1525 450 None None None None 95.000
30082 30082 20033 None 9729 10.2460/javma.228.7.1074 Halbert2006a Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Campylobacter spp isolated from dairy cattle and farms managed organically and conventionally in the midwestern and northeastern United States United States of America Observational 11287 11287 Production Type Production Type Conventional Organic Dairy Cattle None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Lincosamides clindamycin None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 1.30 None 1.00 None 840 282 None None None None 95.000
30083 30083 20033 None 9729 10.2460/javma.228.7.1074 Halbert2006a Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Campylobacter spp isolated from dairy cattle and farms managed organically and conventionally in the midwestern and northeastern United States United States of America Observational 11287 11287 Production Type Production Type Conventional Organic Dairy Cattle None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 1.20 None 1.10 None 1525 450 None None None None 95.000
30084 30084 20033 None 9729 10.2460/javma.228.7.1074 Halbert2006a Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Campylobacter spp isolated from dairy cattle and farms managed organically and conventionally in the midwestern and northeastern United States United States of America Observational 11287 11287 Production Type Production Type Conventional Organic Dairy Cattle None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Amphenicols florfenicol None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 0.30 None 0.00 None 686 168 None None None None 95.000
30085 30085 20033 None 9729 10.2460/javma.228.7.1074 Halbert2006a Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Campylobacter spp isolated from dairy cattle and farms managed organically and conventionally in the midwestern and northeastern United States United States of America Observational 11287 11287 Production Type Production Type Conventional Organic Dairy Cattle None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 0.10 None 0.00 None 686 168 None None None None 95.000
30086 30086 20033 None 9729 10.2460/javma.228.7.1074 Halbert2006a Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Campylobacter spp isolated from dairy cattle and farms managed organically and conventionally in the midwestern and northeastern United States United States of America Observational 11287 11287 Production Type Production Type Conventional Organic Dairy Cattle None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 32.40 None 30.00 None 686 168 None None None None 95.000
30087 30087 20033 None 9729 10.2460/javma.228.7.1074 Halbert2006a Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Campylobacter spp isolated from dairy cattle and farms managed organically and conventionally in the midwestern and northeastern United States United States of America Observational 11287 11287 Production Type Production Type Conventional Organic Dairy Cattle None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 1.90 None 1.30 None 1525 450 None None None None 95.000
30088 30088 20033 None 9729 10.2460/javma.228.7.1074 Halbert2006a Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Campylobacter spp isolated from dairy cattle and farms managed organically and conventionally in the midwestern and northeastern United States United States of America Observational 11287 11287 Production Type Production Type Conventional Organic Dairy Cattle None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 1.60 None 0.60 None 686 168 None None None None 95.000
30089 30089 20033 None 9729 10.2460/javma.228.7.1074 Halbert2006a Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Campylobacter spp isolated from dairy cattle and farms managed organically and conventionally in the midwestern and northeastern United States United States of America Observational 11287 11287 Production Type Production Type Conventional Organic Dairy Cattle None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 37.20 None 38.70 None 686 168 None None None None 95.000
30090 30090 20033 None 9729 10.2460/javma.228.7.1074 Halbert2006a Evaluation of antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Campylobacter spp isolated from dairy cattle and farms managed organically and conventionally in the midwestern and northeastern United States United States of America Observational 11287 11287 Production Type Production Type Conventional Organic Dairy Cattle None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 58.30 None 49.30 None 1525 450 None None None None 95.000
30091 30091 20032 None 9439 10.1093/jac/dki305 Gebreyes2005 Campylobacter coli: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 11284 11284 Production stage Finishing farm extensive intensive Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter None False None False 1 None 7 None None None None None 162 204 None None None None 95.000
30092 30092 20032 None 9439 10.1093/jac/dki305 Gebreyes2005 Campylobacter coli: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 11284 11284 Production stage Finishing farm extensive intensive Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter None False None False 2 None 1 None None None None None 162 204 None None None None 95.000
30093 30093 20032 None 9439 10.1093/jac/dki305 Gebreyes2005 Campylobacter coli: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 11284 11284 Production stage Finishing farm extensive intensive Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter None False None False 32 None 113 None None None None None 162 204 None None None None 95.000
30094 30094 20032 None 9439 10.1093/jac/dki305 Gebreyes2005 Campylobacter coli: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 11284 11284 Production stage Finishing farm extensive intensive Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter None False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 162 204 None None None None 95.000
30095 30095 20032 None 9439 10.1093/jac/dki305 Gebreyes2005 Campylobacter coli: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 11284 11284 Production stage Finishing farm extensive intensive Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter None False None False 5 None 22 None None None None None 162 204 None None None None 95.000
30096 30096 20032 None 9439 10.1093/jac/dki305 Gebreyes2005 Campylobacter coli: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 11284 11284 Production stage Finishing farm extensive intensive Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter None False None False 62 None 120 None None None None None 162 204 None None None None 95.000
30097 30097 20032 None 9439 10.1093/jac/dki305 Gebreyes2005 Campylobacter coli: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 11286 11286 Production stage Slaughter. Pre-evisceration extensive intensive Swine None None None Abattoir Abattoir Contingency Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter None False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 47 6 None None None None 95.000
30098 30098 20032 None 9439 10.1093/jac/dki305 Gebreyes2005 Campylobacter coli: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 11286 11286 Production stage Slaughter. Pre-evisceration extensive intensive Swine None None None Abattoir Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter None False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 47 6 None None None None 95.000
30099 30099 20032 None 9439 10.1093/jac/dki305 Gebreyes2005 Campylobacter coli: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 11286 11286 Production stage Slaughter. Pre-evisceration extensive intensive Swine None None None Abattoir Abattoir Contingency Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter None False None False 11 None 1 None None None None None 47 6 None None None None 95.000
30100 30100 20032 None 9439 10.1093/jac/dki305 Gebreyes2005 Campylobacter coli: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 11286 11286 Production stage Slaughter. Pre-evisceration extensive intensive Swine None None None Abattoir Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter None False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 47 6 None None None None 95.000
30101 30101 20032 None 9439 10.1093/jac/dki305 Gebreyes2005 Campylobacter coli: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 11286 11286 Production stage Slaughter. Pre-evisceration extensive intensive Swine None None None Abattoir Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter None False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 47 6 None None None None 95.000
30102 30102 20032 None 9439 10.1093/jac/dki305 Gebreyes2005 Campylobacter coli: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 11286 11286 Production stage Slaughter. Pre-evisceration extensive intensive Swine None None None Abattoir Abattoir Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter None False None False 15 None 3 None None None None None 47 6 None None None None 95.000
30103 30103 20032 None 9439 10.1093/jac/dki305 Gebreyes2005 Campylobacter coli: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 11285 11285 Production stage Slaughter. Post-evisceration extensive intensive Swine None None None Abattoir Abattoir Contingency Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter None False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 52 43 None None None None 95.000
30104 30104 20032 None 9439 10.1093/jac/dki305 Gebreyes2005 Campylobacter coli: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 11285 11285 Production stage Slaughter. Post-evisceration extensive intensive Swine None None None Abattoir Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter None False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 52 43 None None None None 95.000
30105 30105 20032 None 9439 10.1093/jac/dki305 Gebreyes2005 Campylobacter coli: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 11285 11285 Production stage Slaughter. Post-evisceration extensive intensive Swine None None None Abattoir Abattoir Contingency Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter None False None False 22 None 27 None None None None None 52 43 None None None None 95.000
30106 30106 20032 None 9439 10.1093/jac/dki305 Gebreyes2005 Campylobacter coli: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 11285 11285 Production stage Slaughter. Post-evisceration extensive intensive Swine None None None Abattoir Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter None False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 52 43 None None None None 95.000
30107 30107 20032 None 9439 10.1093/jac/dki305 Gebreyes2005 Campylobacter coli: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 11285 11285 Production stage Slaughter. Post-evisceration extensive intensive Swine None None None Abattoir Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter None False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 52 43 None None None None 95.000
30108 30108 20032 None 9439 10.1093/jac/dki305 Gebreyes2005 Campylobacter coli: Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance in antimicrobial-free (ABF) swine production systems United States of America Observational 11285 11285 Production stage Slaughter. Post-evisceration extensive intensive Swine None None None Abattoir Abattoir Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter None False None False 15 None 38 None None None None None 52 43 None None None None 95.000
30111 30111 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11267 11267 Amoxacillin-Clavulanic Acid Use Amoxacillin-Clavulanic Acid Use organic conventional Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 3 None 2 None None None None None 72 10 None None None None 95.000
30112 30112 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11268 11268 Ampicillin Use Ampicillin Use organic conventional Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 3 None 2 None None None None None 72 10 None None None None 95.000
30113 30113 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11271 11271 Cephalothin Use Cephalothin Use conventional organic Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 2 None 3 None None None None None 10 72 None None None None 95.000
30114 30114 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11269 11269 Cefoxitin Use Cefoxitin Use organic conventional Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 3 None 2 None None None None None 72 10 None None None None 95.000
30115 30115 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11277 11277 Streptomycin Use Streptomycin Use organic conventional Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 48 None 6 None None None None None 72 10 None None None None 95.000
30116 30116 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11279 11279 Tetracycline Use Tetracycline Use organic conventional Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 49 None 7 None None None None None 72 10 None None None None 95.000
30117 30117 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11270 11270 Ceftiofur Use Ceftiofur Use organic conventional Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 3 None 2 None None None None None 72 10 None None None None 95.000
30118 30118 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11273 11273 Gentamicin Use Gentamicin Use organic conventional Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 5 None 0 None None None None None 72 10 None None None None 95.000
30119 30119 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11278 11278 Sulfamethoxazole Use Sulfamethoxazole Use organic conventional Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 5 None 0 None None None None None 72 10 None None None None 95.000
30120 30120 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11274 11274 Kanamycin Use Kanamycin Use organic conventional Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 72 10 None None None None 95.000
30121 30121 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11275 11275 Nalidixic Acid Use Nalidixic Acid Use organic conventional Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella Kentucky False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 72 10 None None None None 95.000
30122 30122 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11267 11267 Amoxacillin-Clavulanic Acid Use Amoxacillin-Clavulanic Acid Use organic conventional Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella Typhimurium False None False 0 None 12 None None None None None 19 12 None None None None 95.000
30123 30123 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11268 11268 Ampicillin Use Ampicillin Use organic conventional Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella Typhimurium False None False 0 None 12 None None None None None 19 12 None None None None 95.000
30124 30124 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11272 11272 Cephalothin Use Cephalothin Use organic conventional Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Salmonella Typhimurium False None False 0 None 12 None None None None None 19 12 None None None None 95.000
30125 30125 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11269 11269 Cefoxitin Use Cefoxitin Use organic conventional Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Salmonella Typhimurium False None False 0 None 12 None None None None None 19 12 None None None None 95.000
30126 30126 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11277 11277 Streptomycin Use Streptomycin Use organic conventional Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella Typhimurium False None False 2 None 2 None None None None None 19 12 None None None None 95.000
30127 30127 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11279 11279 Tetracycline Use Tetracycline Use organic conventional Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella Typhimurium False None False 2 None 4 None None None None None 19 12 None None None None 95.000
30128 30128 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11270 11270 Ceftiofur Use Ceftiofur Use organic conventional Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella Typhimurium False None False 0 None 12 None None None None None 19 12 None None None None 95.000
30129 30129 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11273 11273 Gentamicin Use Gentamicin Use organic conventional Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella Typhimurium False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 19 12 None None None None 95.000
30130 30130 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11278 11278 Sulfamethoxazole Use Sulfamethoxazole Use organic conventional Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Salmonella Typhimurium False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 19 12 None None None None 95.000
30131 30131 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11274 11274 Kanamycin Use Kanamycin Use organic conventional Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella Typhimurium False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 19 12 None None None None 95.000
30132 30132 20029 None 8606 10.1128/aem.71.7.4108-4111.2005 Cui2005 Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores United States of America Observational 11275 11275 Nalidixic Acid Use Nalidixic Acid Use organic conventional Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella Typhimurium False None False 2 None 0 None None None None None 19 12 None None None None 95.000
30134 30134 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10841 10841 Amoxicillin Use Amoxicillin Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 16.06 None 25.44 None 155 296 None None None None 95.000
30135 30135 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10845 10845 Cefotaxim Use Cefotaxim Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.45 None 155 296 None None None None 95.000
30136 30136 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10847 10847 Chloramphenicol Use Chloramphenicol Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 5.79 None 12.25 None 155 296 None None None None 95.000
30137 30137 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10849 10849 Ciprofloxacin Use Ciprofloxacin Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 155 296 None None None None 95.000
30138 30138 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10858 10858 Florfenicol Use Florfenicol Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Amphenicols florfenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.20 None 1.29 None 155 296 None None None None 95.000
30139 30139 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10860 10860 Gentamycin Use Gentamycin Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.62 None 0.30 None 155 296 None None None None 95.000
30140 30140 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10866 10866 Nalidixic Acid Use Nalidixic Acid Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 1.65 None 155 296 None None None None 95.000
30141 30141 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10868 10868 Neomycin Use Neomycin Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.65 None 2.05 None 155 296 None None None None 95.000
30142 30142 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10876 10876 Sulfamethoxazole Use Sulfamethoxazole Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 27.25 None 52.95 None 155 296 None None None None 95.000
30143 30143 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10880 10880 Tetracycline Use Tetracycline Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 38.21 None 64.12 None 155 296 None None None None 95.000
30144 30144 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10882 10882 Trimethoprim Use Trimethoprim Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 16.73 None 42.66 None 155 296 None None None None 95.000
30145 30145 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10841 10841 Amoxicillin Use Amoxicillin Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 105 110 None None None None 95.000
30146 30146 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10843 10843 Bacitracin Use Bacitracin Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Other antibacterials bacitracin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 36.43 None 46.95 None 105 110 None None None None 95.000
30147 30147 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10847 10847 Chloramphenicol Use Chloramphenicol Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.90 None 0.00 None 105 110 None None None None 95.000
30148 30148 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10849 10849 Ciprofloxacin Use Ciprofloxacin Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 2.81 None 0.00 None 105 110 None None None None 95.000
30149 30149 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10851 10851 Doxycycline Use Doxycycline Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines doxycycline None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 65.97 None 74.51 None 105 110 None None None None 95.000
30150 30150 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10854 10854 Erythromycin Use Erythromycin Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 8.55 None 32.43 None 105 110 None None None None 95.000
30151 30151 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10855 10855 Falvomycin Use Flavomycin Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Antibiotics bambermycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 99.12 None 100.00 None 105 110 None None None None 95.000
30152 30152 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10860 10860 Gentamycin Use Gentamycin Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 105 110 None None None None 95.000
30153 30153 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10862 10862 Linezolid Use Linezolid Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Other antibacterials linezolid None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 105 110 None None None None 95.000
30154 30154 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10870 10870 Salinomycin Use Salinomycin Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Pyranes and hydropyranes salinomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 2.74 None 43.80 None 105 110 None None None None 95.000
30155 30155 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10872 10872 Streptomycin Use Streptomycin Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 10.46 None 8.17 None 105 110 None None None None 95.000
30156 30156 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10878 10878 Synercid Use Synercid Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 33.56 None 53.21 None 105 110 None None None None 95.000
30157 30157 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10884 10884 Vancomycin Use Vancomycin Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 105 110 None None None None 95.000
30158 30158 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10841 10841 Amoxicillin Use Amoxicillin Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 7.16 None 22.64 None 84 198 None None None None 95.000
30159 30159 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10847 10847 Chloramphenicol Use Chloramphenicol Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 84 198 None None None None 95.000
30160 30160 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10849 10849 Ciprofloxacin Use Ciprofloxacin Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 5.17 None 7.23 None 84 198 None None None None 95.000
30161 30161 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10851 10851 Doxycycline Use Doxycycline Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines doxycycline None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 46.72 None 75.43 None 84 198 None None None None 95.000
30162 30162 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10854 10854 Erythromycin Use Erythromycin Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 11.01 None 18.50 None 84 198 None None None None 95.000
30163 30163 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10860 10860 Gentamycin Use Gentamycin Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 84 198 None None None None 95.000
30164 30164 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10864 10864 Metronidazole Use Metronidazole Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Nitroimidazole derivatives metronidazole None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 34.83 None 41.04 None 84 198 None None None None 95.000
30165 30165 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10866 10866 Nalidixic Acid Use Nalidixic Acid Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 6.03 None 7.78 None 84 198 None None None None 95.000
30166 30166 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10868 10868 Neomycin Use Neomycin Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides neomycin None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 84 198 None None None None 95.000
30167 30167 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10872 10872 Streptomycin Use Streptomycin Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 76.50 None 83.47 None 84 198 None None None None 95.000
30168 30168 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10876 10876 Sulfamethoxazole Use Sulfamethoxazole Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 18.01 None 48.24 None 84 198 None None None None 95.000
30169 30169 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10874 10874 Sulfamethoxazole and Trimethoprim Use Sulfamethoxazole and Trimethoprim Use organic conventional Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 23.96 None 61.99 None 84 198 None None None None 95.000
30170 30170 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10840 10840 Amoxicillin Use Amoxicillin Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 17.73 None 64.15 None 45 300 None None None None 95.000
40215 40215 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11324 11324 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
30171 30171 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10844 10844 Cefotaxim Use Cefotaxim Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 9.71 None 45 300 None None None None 95.000
30172 30172 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10846 10846 Chloramphenicol Use Chloramphenicol Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.18 None 22.85 None 45 300 None None None None 95.000
30173 30173 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10848 10848 Ciprofloxacin Use Ciprofloxacin Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.46 None 45 300 None None None None 95.000
30174 30174 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10857 10857 Florfenicol Use Florfenicol Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Amphenicols florfenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 2.16 None 45 300 None None None None 95.000
30175 30175 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10859 10859 Gentamycin Use Gentamycin Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 4.11 None 45 300 None None None None 95.000
30176 30176 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10865 10865 Nalidixic Acid Use Nalidixic Acid Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.58 None 46.41 None 45 300 None None None None 95.000
30177 30177 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10867 10867 Neomycin Use Neomycin Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 12.64 None 45 300 None None None None 95.000
30178 30178 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10875 10875 Sulfamethoxazole Use Sulfamethoxazole Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 13.37 None 72.94 None 45 300 None None None None 95.000
30179 30179 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10879 10879 Tetracycline Use Tetracycline Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 44.48 None 66.63 None 45 300 None None None None 95.000
30180 30180 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10881 10881 Trimethoprim Use Trimethoprim Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 11.16 None 62.74 None 45 300 None None None None 95.000
30181 30181 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10840 10840 Amoxicillin Use Amoxicillin Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.00 None 3.75 None 45 180 None None None None 95.000
30182 30182 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10842 10842 Bacitracin Use Bacitracin Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Other antibacterials bacitracin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 28.00 None 77.99 None 45 180 None None None None 95.000
30183 30183 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10846 10846 Chloramphenicol Use Chloramphenicol Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 45 180 None None None None 95.000
30184 30184 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10848 10848 Ciprofloxacin Use Ciprofloxacin Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 45 180 None None None None 95.000
30185 30185 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10850 10850 Doxycycline Use Doxycycline Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines doxycycline None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 52.56 None 73.46 None 45 180 None None None None 95.000
30186 30186 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10852 10852 Erthyromycin Use Erythromycin Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 12.56 None 69.54 None 45 180 None None None None 95.000
30187 30187 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10856 10856 Flavomycin Use Flavomycin Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Antibiotics bambermycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 45 180 None None None None 95.000
30188 30188 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10859 10859 Gentamycin Use Gentamycin Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.00 None 2.25 None 45 180 None None None None 95.000
30189 30189 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10861 10861 Linezolid Use Linezolid Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Other antibacterials linezolid None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 45 180 None None None None 95.000
30190 30190 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10869 10869 Salinomycin Use Salinomycin Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Pyranes and hydropyranes salinomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 5.26 None 81.97 None 45 180 None None None None 95.000
30191 30191 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10871 10871 Streptomycin Use Streptomycin Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 12.56 None 32.49 None 45 180 None None None None 95.000
30192 30192 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10877 10877 Synercid Use Synercid Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 30.41 None 21.66 None 45 180 None None None None 95.000
30193 30193 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10883 10883 Vancomycin Use Vancomycin Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.00 None 1.35 None 45 180 None None None None 95.000
30195 30195 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10840 10840 Amoxicillin Use Amoxicillin Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 43.90 None 50.17 None 32 57 None None None None 95.000
30196 30196 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10846 10846 Chloramphenicol Use Chloramphenicol Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 0.00 None 1.87 None 32 57 None None None None 95.000
30197 30197 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10848 10848 Ciprofloxacin Use Ciprofloxacin Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 53.30 None 40.56 None 32 57 None None None None 95.000
30198 30198 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10850 10850 Doxycycline Use Doxycycline Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines doxycycline None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 43.70 None 45.70 None 32 57 None None None None 95.000
13827 13827 10314 None 11772 10.4315/0362-028X-71.12.2537 Miranda_2008_JoofFoPr Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from organic and conventional poultry meat Spain Observational 10932 10932 Production type Fresh, prepackaged, skin-on drumstick products certified by an official agency compared to conventional Organic production Conventional production Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.80 95.20 9.60 90.40 105 115 None None None 0.3841 None
13828 13828 10314 None 11772 10.4315/0362-028X-71.12.2537 Miranda_2008_JoofFoPr Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from organic and conventional poultry meat Spain Observational 10932 10932 Production type Fresh, prepackaged, skin-on drumstick products certified by an official agency compared to conventional Organic production Conventional production Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 24.70 75.20 40.00 60.00 105 115 None None None 0.0026 None
13829 13829 10314 None 11772 10.4315/0362-028X-71.12.2537 Miranda_2008_JoofFoPr Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from organic and conventional poultry meat Spain Observational 10932 10932 Production type Fresh, prepackaged, skin-on drumstick products certified by an official agency compared to conventional Organic production Conventional production Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines doxycycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 42.80 57.10 95.60 4.30 105 115 None None None <0.0001 None
13830 13830 10314 None 11772 10.4315/0362-028X-71.12.2537 Miranda_2008_JoofFoPr Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from organic and conventional poultry meat Spain Observational 10932 10932 Production type Fresh, prepackaged, skin-on drumstick products certified by an official agency compared to conventional Organic production Conventional production Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.90 96.20 1.70 98.30 105 115 None None None 0.1687 None
13831 13831 10314 None 11772 10.4315/0362-028X-71.12.2537 Miranda_2008_JoofFoPr Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from organic and conventional poultry meat Spain Observational 10932 10932 Production type Fresh, prepackaged, skin-on drumstick products certified by an official agency compared to conventional Organic production Conventional production Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 2.00 98.10 22.60 77.40 105 115 None None None <0.0001 None
13832 13832 10314 None 11772 10.4315/0362-028X-71.12.2537 Miranda_2008_JoofFoPr Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from organic and conventional poultry meat Spain Observational 10932 10932 Production type Fresh, prepackaged, skin-on drumstick products certified by an official agency compared to conventional Organic production Conventional production Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 6.70 93.30 15.70 84.30 105 115 None None None 0.1059 None
13833 13833 10314 None 11772 10.4315/0362-028X-71.12.2537 Miranda_2008_JoofFoPr Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from organic and conventional poultry meat Spain Observational 10932 10932 Production type Fresh, prepackaged, skin-on drumstick products certified by an official agency compared to conventional Organic production Conventional production Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 55.20 44.80 93.10 7.00 105 115 None None None <0.0001 None
13834 13834 10314 None 11772 10.4315/0362-028X-71.12.2537 Miranda_2008_JoofFoPr Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from organic and conventional poultry meat Spain Observational 10932 10932 Production type Fresh, prepackaged, skin-on drumstick products certified by an official agency compared to conventional Organic production Conventional production Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 22.90 77.10 43.50 56.60 105 115 None None None 0.0021 None
13835 13835 10312 None 11682 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 Peng_2016_EnviMicr Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets United States of America Observational 10930 10930 Production type Production type Organic retail poultry meat Conventional retail poultry meat Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 4 None 0 None None None None None 55 33 None None None None None
13836 13836 10312 None 11682 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 Peng_2016_EnviMicr Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets United States of America Observational 10930 10930 Production type Production type Organic retail poultry meat Conventional retail poultry meat Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 3 None 16 None None None None None 55 33 None None None None None
13837 13837 10312 None 11682 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 Peng_2016_EnviMicr Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets United States of America Observational 10930 10930 Production type Production type Organic retail poultry meat Conventional retail poultry meat Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 24 None 0 None None None None None 55 33 None None None None None
13838 13838 10312 None 11682 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 Peng_2016_EnviMicr Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets United States of America Observational 10930 10930 Production type Production type Organic retail poultry meat Conventional retail poultry meat Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 55 33 None None None None None
13839 13839 10312 None 11682 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 Peng_2016_EnviMicr Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets United States of America Observational 10930 10930 Production type Production type Organic retail poultry meat Conventional retail poultry meat Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 42 None 33 None None None None None 55 33 None None None None None
13840 13840 10312 None 11682 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 Peng_2016_EnviMicr Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets United States of America Observational 10930 10930 Production type Production type Organic retail poultry meat Conventional retail poultry meat Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 55 33 None None None None None
13841 13841 10312 None 11682 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 Peng_2016_EnviMicr Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets United States of America Observational 10930 10930 Production type Production type Organic retail poultry meat Conventional retail poultry meat Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 55 33 None None None None None
13842 13842 10312 None 11682 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 Peng_2016_EnviMicr Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets United States of America Observational 10930 10930 Production type Production type Organic retail poultry meat Conventional retail poultry meat Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 18 None 5 None None None None None 55 33 None None None None None
13844 13844 10312 None 11682 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 Peng_2016_EnviMicr Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets United States of America Observational 10929 10929 Production type Environmental, fecal, feed, water and egg samples from MCL and conventional poultry farms Mixed crop-livestock farms Conventional farms Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 88 21 None None None None None
13845 13845 10312 None 11682 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 Peng_2016_EnviMicr Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets United States of America Observational 10929 10929 Production type Environmental, fecal, feed, water and egg samples from MCL and conventional poultry farms Mixed crop-livestock farms Conventional farms Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 88 21 None None None None None
13846 13846 10312 None 11682 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 Peng_2016_EnviMicr Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets United States of America Observational 10929 10929 Production type Environmental, fecal, feed, water and egg samples from MCL and conventional poultry farms Mixed crop-livestock farms Conventional farms Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 33 None 18 None None None None None 88 21 None None None None None
13847 13847 10312 None 11682 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 Peng_2016_EnviMicr Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets United States of America Observational 10929 10929 Production type Environmental, fecal, feed, water and egg samples from MCL and conventional poultry farms Mixed crop-livestock farms Conventional farms Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 1 None 2 None None None None None 88 21 None None None None None
13848 13848 10312 None 11682 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 Peng_2016_EnviMicr Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets United States of America Observational 10929 10929 Production type Environmental, fecal, feed, water and egg samples from MCL and conventional poultry farms Mixed crop-livestock farms Conventional farms Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 2 None 0 None None None None None 88 21 None None None None None
13849 13849 10312 None 11682 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 Peng_2016_EnviMicr Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets United States of America Observational 10929 10929 Production type Environmental, fecal, feed, water and egg samples from MCL and conventional poultry farms Mixed crop-livestock farms Conventional farms Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 1 None 3 None None None None None 88 21 None None None None None
13850 13850 10312 None 11682 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 Peng_2016_EnviMicr Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets United States of America Observational 10929 10929 Production type Environmental, fecal, feed, water and egg samples from MCL and conventional poultry farms Mixed crop-livestock farms Conventional farms Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 88 21 None None None None None
13851 13851 10312 None 11682 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 Peng_2016_EnviMicr Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets United States of America Observational 10929 10929 Production type Environmental, fecal, feed, water and egg samples from MCL and conventional poultry farms Mixed crop-livestock farms Conventional farms Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 7 None 0 None None None None None 88 21 None None None None None
13852 13852 10308 None 11054 10.1111/zph.12381 Lebert_2018_ZooandPubHea Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks Canada Observational 10922 10922 Production type Smallholder flocks compared to commercial (CIPARS) flocks Smallholder flocks Commercial flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 97 None 7 None None None None None 1022 58 None None None None None
13853 13853 10308 None 11054 10.1111/zph.12381 Lebert_2018_ZooandPubHea Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks Canada Observational 10922 10922 Production type Smallholder flocks compared to commercial (CIPARS) flocks Smallholder flocks Commercial flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 217 None 27 None None None None None 1022 58 None None None None None
13854 13854 10308 None 11054 10.1111/zph.12381 Lebert_2018_ZooandPubHea Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks Canada Observational 10922 10922 Production type Smallholder flocks compared to commercial (CIPARS) flocks Smallholder flocks Commercial flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 156 None 21 None None None None None 1022 58 None None None None None
13855 13855 10308 None 11054 10.1111/zph.12381 Lebert_2018_ZooandPubHea Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks Canada Observational 10922 10922 Production type Smallholder flocks compared to commercial (CIPARS) flocks Smallholder flocks Commercial flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 39 None 5 None None None None None 1022 58 None None None None None
13856 13856 10308 None 11054 10.1111/zph.12381 Lebert_2018_ZooandPubHea Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks Canada Observational 10922 10922 Production type Smallholder flocks compared to commercial (CIPARS) flocks Smallholder flocks Commercial flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 36 None 4 None None None None None 1022 58 None None None None None
13857 13857 10308 None 11054 10.1111/zph.12381 Lebert_2018_ZooandPubHea Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks Canada Observational 10922 10922 Production type Smallholder flocks compared to commercial (CIPARS) flocks Smallholder flocks Commercial flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 35 None 5 None None None None None 1022 58 None None None None None
13858 13858 10308 None 11054 10.1111/zph.12381 Lebert_2018_ZooandPubHea Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks Canada Observational 10922 10922 Production type Smallholder flocks compared to commercial (CIPARS) flocks Smallholder flocks Commercial flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 33 None 4 None None None None None 1022 58 None None None None None
13859 13859 10308 None 11054 10.1111/zph.12381 Lebert_2018_ZooandPubHea Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks Canada Observational 10922 10922 Production type Smallholder flocks compared to commercial (CIPARS) flocks Smallholder flocks Commercial flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False 162 None 26 None None None None None 1022 58 None None None None None
13860 13860 10308 None 11054 10.1111/zph.12381 Lebert_2018_ZooandPubHea Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks Canada Observational 10922 10922 Production type Smallholder flocks compared to commercial (CIPARS) flocks Smallholder flocks Commercial flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 52 None 15 None None None None None 1022 58 None None None None None
13861 13861 10308 None 11054 10.1111/zph.12381 Lebert_2018_ZooandPubHea Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks Canada Observational 10922 10922 Production type Smallholder flocks compared to commercial (CIPARS) flocks Smallholder flocks Commercial flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides azithromycin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 1022 58 None None None None None
13862 13862 10308 None 11054 10.1111/zph.12381 Lebert_2018_ZooandPubHea Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks Canada Observational 10922 10922 Production type Smallholder flocks compared to commercial (CIPARS) flocks Smallholder flocks Commercial flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 3 None None None None None 1022 58 None None None None None
13863 13863 10308 None 11054 10.1111/zph.12381 Lebert_2018_ZooandPubHea Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks Canada Observational 10922 10922 Production type Smallholder flocks compared to commercial (CIPARS) flocks Smallholder flocks Commercial flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 1022 58 None None None None None
13864 13864 10308 None 11054 10.1111/zph.12381 Lebert_2018_ZooandPubHea Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks Canada Observational 10922 10922 Production type Smallholder flocks compared to commercial (CIPARS) flocks Smallholder flocks Commercial flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 22 None 3 None None None None None 1022 58 None None None None None
13865 13865 10308 None 11054 10.1111/zph.12381 Lebert_2018_ZooandPubHea Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks Canada Observational 10922 10922 Production type Smallholder flocks compared to commercial (CIPARS) flocks Smallholder flocks Commercial flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 379 None 33 None None None None None 1022 58 None None None None None
13866 13866 10299 None 10352 10.1080/03079457.2016.1168515 Jimnez.Belenguer_2016_AviaPath Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli isolated in newly-hatched chickens and effect of amoxicillin treatment during their growth Spain Experimental 10904 10904 Amoxicillin use Amoxicillin administered with an oral syringe. 24, 12 or 8 mg amoxicillin/kg body weight (treatment groups not stratified). Measurement taken after 3rd treatment. Amoxicillin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 0.00 87.50 12.50 18 4 None None None None None
13867 13867 10299 None 10352 10.1080/03079457.2016.1168515 Jimnez.Belenguer_2016_AviaPath Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli isolated in newly-hatched chickens and effect of amoxicillin treatment during their growth Spain Experimental 10903 10903 Amoxicillin use Amoxicillin administered with an oral syringe. 24, 12 or 8 mg amoxicillin/kg body weight (treatment groups not stratified) Amoxicillin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 88.20 11.80 37.50 62.50 18 4 None None None None None
13868 13868 10299 None 10352 10.1080/03079457.2016.1168515 Jimnez.Belenguer_2016_AviaPath Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli isolated in newly-hatched chickens and effect of amoxicillin treatment during their growth Spain Experimental 10903 10903 Amoxicillin use Amoxicillin administered with an oral syringe. 24, 12 or 8 mg amoxicillin/kg body weight (treatment groups not stratified) Amoxicillin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 18 4 None None None None None
13869 13869 10299 None 10352 10.1080/03079457.2016.1168515 Jimnez.Belenguer_2016_AviaPath Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli isolated in newly-hatched chickens and effect of amoxicillin treatment during their growth Spain Experimental 10903 10903 Amoxicillin use Amoxicillin administered with an oral syringe. 24, 12 or 8 mg amoxicillin/kg body weight (treatment groups not stratified) Amoxicillin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 79.40 20.60 37.50 62.50 18 4 None None None None None
13870 13870 10299 None 10352 10.1080/03079457.2016.1168515 Jimnez.Belenguer_2016_AviaPath Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli isolated in newly-hatched chickens and effect of amoxicillin treatment during their growth Spain Experimental 10903 10903 Amoxicillin use Amoxicillin administered with an oral syringe. 24, 12 or 8 mg amoxicillin/kg body weight (treatment groups not stratified) Amoxicillin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 100.00 None 100.00 18 4 None None None None None
13871 13871 10299 None 10352 10.1080/03079457.2016.1168515 Jimnez.Belenguer_2016_AviaPath Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli isolated in newly-hatched chickens and effect of amoxicillin treatment during their growth Spain Experimental 10903 10903 Amoxicillin use Amoxicillin administered with an oral syringe. 24, 12 or 8 mg amoxicillin/kg body weight (treatment groups not stratified) Amoxicillin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 100.00 11.80 88.20 18 4 None None None None None
13872 13872 10299 None 10352 10.1080/03079457.2016.1168515 Jimnez.Belenguer_2016_AviaPath Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli isolated in newly-hatched chickens and effect of amoxicillin treatment during their growth Spain Experimental 10903 10903 Amoxicillin use Amoxicillin administered with an oral syringe. 24, 12 or 8 mg amoxicillin/kg body weight (treatment groups not stratified) Amoxicillin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 100.00 8.80 91.20 18 4 None None None None None
13873 13873 10299 None 10352 10.1080/03079457.2016.1168515 Jimnez.Belenguer_2016_AviaPath Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli isolated in newly-hatched chickens and effect of amoxicillin treatment during their growth Spain Experimental 10903 10903 Amoxicillin use Amoxicillin administered with an oral syringe. 24, 12 or 8 mg amoxicillin/kg body weight (treatment groups not stratified) Amoxicillin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 25.00 75.00 26.50 73.50 18 4 None None None None None
13874 13874 10299 None 10352 10.1080/03079457.2016.1168515 Jimnez.Belenguer_2016_AviaPath Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli isolated in newly-hatched chickens and effect of amoxicillin treatment during their growth Spain Experimental 10902 10902 41 Amoxicillin administered with an oral syringe. 24, 12 or 8 mg amoxicillin/kg body weight (treatment groups not stratified) Amoxicillin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 20.60 79.40 21.20 78.80 18 4 None None None None None
13875 13875 10299 None 10352 10.1080/03079457.2016.1168515 Jimnez.Belenguer_2016_AviaPath Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli isolated in newly-hatched chickens and effect of amoxicillin treatment during their growth Spain Experimental 10903 10903 Amoxicillin use Amoxicillin administered with an oral syringe. 24, 12 or 8 mg amoxicillin/kg body weight (treatment groups not stratified) Amoxicillin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 58.80 41.20 87.50 12.50 18 4 None None None None None
13876 13876 10299 None 10352 10.1080/03079457.2016.1168515 Jimnez.Belenguer_2016_AviaPath Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli isolated in newly-hatched chickens and effect of amoxicillin treatment during their growth Spain Experimental 10903 10903 Amoxicillin use Amoxicillin administered with an oral syringe. 24, 12 or 8 mg amoxicillin/kg body weight (treatment groups not stratified) Amoxicillin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 8.80 91.20 0.00 100.00 18 4 None None None None None
13877 13877 10299 None 10352 10.1080/03079457.2016.1168515 Jimnez.Belenguer_2016_AviaPath Antimicrobial resistance of Escherichia coli isolated in newly-hatched chickens and effect of amoxicillin treatment during their growth Spain Experimental 10903 10903 Amoxicillin use Amoxicillin administered with an oral syringe. 24, 12 or 8 mg amoxicillin/kg body weight (treatment groups not stratified) Amoxicillin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Sample Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 67.60 32.40 25.00 75.00 18 4 None None None None None
13878 13878 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 15 29 None None None None None
13879 13879 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 15 None 27 None None None None None 15 29 None None None None None
13880 13880 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials daptomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 15 29 None None None None None
13881 13881 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 5 None None None None None 15 29 None None None None None
13882 13882 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Lincosamides lincomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 5 None None None None None 15 29 None None None None None
13883 13883 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins benzylpenicillin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 4 None None None None None 15 29 None None None None None
13884 13884 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 4 None None None None None 15 29 None None None None None
13885 13885 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 4 None None None None None 15 29 None None None None None
13886 13886 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 5 None None None None None 15 29 None None None None None
13887 13887 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 5 None None None None None 15 29 None None None None None
13888 13888 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus Other False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 5 17 None None None None None
13889 13889 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus Other False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 5 17 None None None None None
13890 13890 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials daptomycin None Enterococcus Other False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 5 17 None None None None None
13891 13891 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Other False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 5 17 None None None None None
13892 13892 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Lincosamides lincomycin None Enterococcus Other False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 5 17 None None None None None
13893 13893 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins benzylpenicillin None Enterococcus Other False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 5 17 None None None None None
13894 13894 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus Other False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 5 17 None None None None None
13895 13895 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus Other False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 5 17 None None None None None
13896 13896 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Other False None False 2 None 10 None None None None None 5 17 None None None None None
13897 13897 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus Other False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 5 17 None None None None None
13898 13898 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 11 14 None None None None None
13899 13899 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 11 14 None None None None None
13900 13900 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 11 14 None None None None None
13901 13901 10168 None 9002 10.1111/j.1472-765x.2009.02603.x Edrington2009 Influence of sprinklers, used to alleviate heat stress, on faecal shedding of E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella and Enterococcus in lactating dairy cattle United States of America Experimental 10492 10492 Sprinkler use feedbunk or holding pen sprinklers Vs. no use Sprinkler use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Salmonella spp. False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 11 14 None None None None None
13902 13902 10295 None 10254 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00950.x Jacobs.Reitsma_1994_LeinApMi The induction of quinolone resistance in Campylobacter bacteria in broilers by quinolone treatment Netherlands Experimental 10890 10890 Flumequine Use Tx group challenged with Camp. Jejuni on day 19. Tx with 15ppm flumequine on days 26-29. Sampling on day 43. Control group also challenged on day 19 but received no tx. Flumequine use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 12 0 11 0 None None None None 12 11 None None None None None
13903 13903 10295 None 10254 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00950.x Jacobs.Reitsma_1994_LeinApMi The induction of quinolone resistance in Campylobacter bacteria in broilers by quinolone treatment Netherlands Experimental 10890 10890 Flumequine Use Tx group challenged with Camp. Jejuni on day 19. Tx with 15ppm flumequine on days 26-29. Sampling on day 43. Control group also challenged on day 19 but received no tx. Flumequine use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 0 12 0 11 None None None None 12 11 None None None None None
13904 13904 10295 None 10254 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00950.x Jacobs.Reitsma_1994_LeinApMi The induction of quinolone resistance in Campylobacter bacteria in broilers by quinolone treatment Netherlands Experimental 10890 10890 Flumequine Use Tx group challenged with Camp. Jejuni on day 19. Tx with 15ppm flumequine on days 26-29. Sampling on day 43. Control group also challenged on day 19 but received no tx. Flumequine use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones flumequine None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 0 12 0 11 None None None None 12 11 None None None None None
13905 13905 10295 None 10254 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00950.x Jacobs.Reitsma_1994_LeinApMi The induction of quinolone resistance in Campylobacter bacteria in broilers by quinolone treatment Netherlands Experimental 10890 10890 Flumequine Use Tx group challenged with Camp. Jejuni on day 19. Tx with 15ppm flumequine on days 26-29. Sampling on day 43. Control group also challenged on day 19 but received no tx. Flumequine use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 0 12 0 11 None None None None 12 11 None None None None None
13906 13906 10295 None 10254 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00950.x Jacobs.Reitsma_1994_LeinApMi The induction of quinolone resistance in Campylobacter bacteria in broilers by quinolone treatment Netherlands Experimental 10891 10891 Flumequine Use Tx group challenged with Camp. Jejuni on day 19. Tx with 50ppm flumequine on days 26-29. Sampling on day 43. Control group also challenged on day 19 but received no tx. Flumequine use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 12 0 11 0 None None None None 12 11 None None None None None
13907 13907 10295 None 10254 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00950.x Jacobs.Reitsma_1994_LeinApMi The induction of quinolone resistance in Campylobacter bacteria in broilers by quinolone treatment Netherlands Experimental 10891 10891 Flumequine Use Tx group challenged with Camp. Jejuni on day 19. Tx with 50ppm flumequine on days 26-29. Sampling on day 43. Control group also challenged on day 19 but received no tx. Flumequine use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 0 12 0 11 None None None None 12 11 None None None None None
13908 13908 10295 None 10254 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00950.x Jacobs.Reitsma_1994_LeinApMi The induction of quinolone resistance in Campylobacter bacteria in broilers by quinolone treatment Netherlands Experimental 10891 10891 Flumequine Use Tx group challenged with Camp. Jejuni on day 19. Tx with 50ppm flumequine on days 26-29. Sampling on day 43. Control group also challenged on day 19 but received no tx. Flumequine use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones flumequine None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 0 12 0 11 None None None None 12 11 None None None None None
13909 13909 10295 None 10254 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00950.x Jacobs.Reitsma_1994_LeinApMi The induction of quinolone resistance in Campylobacter bacteria in broilers by quinolone treatment Netherlands Experimental 10891 10891 Flumequine Use Tx group challenged with Camp. Jejuni on day 19. Tx with 50ppm flumequine on days 26-29. Sampling on day 43. Control group also challenged on day 19 but received no tx. Flumequine use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 0 12 0 11 None None None None 12 11 None None None None None
13910 13910 10295 None 10254 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00950.x Jacobs.Reitsma_1994_LeinApMi The induction of quinolone resistance in Campylobacter bacteria in broilers by quinolone treatment Netherlands Experimental 10887 10887 Enrofloxacin Use Tx group challenged with Camp. Jejuni on day 19. Tx with 15ppm enrofloxacin on days 26-29. Sampling on day 43. Control group also challenged on day 19 but received no tx. Enrofloxacin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 12 0 11 0 None None None None 12 11 None None None None None
13911 13911 10295 None 10254 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00950.x Jacobs.Reitsma_1994_LeinApMi The induction of quinolone resistance in Campylobacter bacteria in broilers by quinolone treatment Netherlands Experimental 10887 10887 Enrofloxacin Use Tx group challenged with Camp. Jejuni on day 19. Tx with 15ppm enrofloxacin on days 26-29. Sampling on day 43. Control group also challenged on day 19 but received no tx. Enrofloxacin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 12 0 0 11 None None None None 12 11 None None None None None
13912 13912 10295 None 10254 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00950.x Jacobs.Reitsma_1994_LeinApMi The induction of quinolone resistance in Campylobacter bacteria in broilers by quinolone treatment Netherlands Experimental 10887 10887 Enrofloxacin Use Tx group challenged with Camp. Jejuni on day 19. Tx with 15ppm enrofloxacin on days 26-29. Sampling on day 43. Control group also challenged on day 19 but received no tx. Enrofloxacin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones flumequine None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 12 0 0 11 None None None None 12 11 None None None None None
13913 13913 10295 None 10254 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00950.x Jacobs.Reitsma_1994_LeinApMi The induction of quinolone resistance in Campylobacter bacteria in broilers by quinolone treatment Netherlands Experimental 10887 10887 Enrofloxacin Use Tx group challenged with Camp. Jejuni on day 19. Tx with 15ppm enrofloxacin on days 26-29. Sampling on day 43. Control group also challenged on day 19 but received no tx. Enrofloxacin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 12 0 0 11 None None None None 12 11 None None None None None
13914 13914 10295 None 10254 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00950.x Jacobs.Reitsma_1994_LeinApMi The induction of quinolone resistance in Campylobacter bacteria in broilers by quinolone treatment Netherlands Experimental 10889 10889 Enrofloxacin Use Tx group challenged with Camp. Jejuni on day 19. Tx with 50ppm enrofloxacin on days 26-29. Sampling on day 43. Control group also challenged on day 19 but received no tx. Enrofloxacin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 10 0 11 0 None None None None 10 11 None None None None None
13915 13915 10295 None 10254 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00950.x Jacobs.Reitsma_1994_LeinApMi The induction of quinolone resistance in Campylobacter bacteria in broilers by quinolone treatment Netherlands Experimental 10889 10889 Enrofloxacin Use Tx group challenged with Camp. Jejuni on day 19. Tx with 50ppm enrofloxacin on days 26-29. Sampling on day 43. Control group also challenged on day 19 but received no tx. Enrofloxacin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 10 0 0 11 None None None None 10 11 None None None None None
13916 13916 10295 None 10254 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00950.x Jacobs.Reitsma_1994_LeinApMi The induction of quinolone resistance in Campylobacter bacteria in broilers by quinolone treatment Netherlands Experimental 10889 10889 Enrofloxacin Use Tx group challenged with Camp. Jejuni on day 19. Tx with 50ppm enrofloxacin on days 26-29. Sampling on day 43. Control group also challenged on day 19 but received no tx. Enrofloxacin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones flumequine None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 10 0 0 11 None None None None 10 11 None None None None None
13917 13917 10295 None 10254 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00950.x Jacobs.Reitsma_1994_LeinApMi The induction of quinolone resistance in Campylobacter bacteria in broilers by quinolone treatment Netherlands Experimental 10889 10889 Enrofloxacin Use Tx group challenged with Camp. Jejuni on day 19. Tx with 50ppm enrofloxacin on days 26-29. Sampling on day 43. Control group also challenged on day 19 but received no tx. Enrofloxacin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 10 0 0 11 None None None None 10 11 None None None None None
13918 13918 10295 None 10254 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00950.x Jacobs.Reitsma_1994_LeinApMi The induction of quinolone resistance in Campylobacter bacteria in broilers by quinolone treatment Netherlands Experimental 10888 10888 Enrofloxacin Use Tx group challenged with Camp. Jejuni on day 19. Tx with 50ppm enrofloxacin on days 1-4. Sampling on day 43. Control group also challenged on day 19 but received no tx. Enrofloxacin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 12 0 11 0 None None None None 12 11 None None None None None
13919 13919 10237 None 7377 10.1186/s12889-016-3377-2 Aliyu_2016_BMCPubHea Risk factors and spatial distribution of extended spectrum -lactamase-producing- Escherichia coli at retail poultry meat markets in Malaysia: A cross-sectional study Malaysia Observational 10694 10694 Stall sanitation Fair vs good; ESBL prevalence Fair stall sanitation Good stall sanitation Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.35 1.15 4.77 0.0499 None
13920 13920 10295 None 10254 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00950.x Jacobs.Reitsma_1994_LeinApMi The induction of quinolone resistance in Campylobacter bacteria in broilers by quinolone treatment Netherlands Experimental 10888 10888 Enrofloxacin Use Tx group challenged with Camp. Jejuni on day 19. Tx with 50ppm enrofloxacin on days 1-4. Sampling on day 43. Control group also challenged on day 19 but received no tx. Enrofloxacin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 0 12 0 11 None None None None 12 11 None None None None None
13921 13921 10295 None 10254 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00950.x Jacobs.Reitsma_1994_LeinApMi The induction of quinolone resistance in Campylobacter bacteria in broilers by quinolone treatment Netherlands Experimental 10888 10888 Enrofloxacin Use Tx group challenged with Camp. Jejuni on day 19. Tx with 50ppm enrofloxacin on days 1-4. Sampling on day 43. Control group also challenged on day 19 but received no tx. Enrofloxacin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones flumequine None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 0 12 0 11 None None None None 12 11 None None None None None
13922 13922 10295 None 10254 10.1111/j.1472-765X.1994.tb00950.x Jacobs.Reitsma_1994_LeinApMi The induction of quinolone resistance in Campylobacter bacteria in broilers by quinolone treatment Netherlands Experimental 10888 10888 Enrofloxacin Use Tx group challenged with Camp. Jejuni on day 19. Tx with 50ppm enrofloxacin on days 1-4. Sampling on day 43. Control group also challenged on day 19 but received no tx. Enrofloxacin use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 0 12 0 11 None None None None 12 11 None None None None None
13923 13923 10294 None 10131 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02120 Hussain_2017_FrinMi Risk of transmission of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli from commercial broiler and free-range retail chicken in India India Observational 10886 10886 Production type Comparison of meat samples: broiler vs. free-range Free-range production Commercial production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 50 None None None None None 13 54 None None None >0.05 None
13924 13924 10294 None 10131 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02120 Hussain_2017_FrinMi Risk of transmission of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli from commercial broiler and free-range retail chicken in India India Observational 10886 10886 Production type Comparison of meat samples: broiler vs. free-range Free-range production Commercial production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 52 None None None None None 13 54 None None None 0 None
13925 13925 10294 None 10131 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02120 Hussain_2017_FrinMi Risk of transmission of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli from commercial broiler and free-range retail chicken in India India Observational 10886 10886 Production type Comparison of meat samples: broiler vs. free-range Free-range production Commercial production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 33 None None None None None 13 54 None None None 0.001 None
13926 13926 10294 None 10131 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02120 Hussain_2017_FrinMi Risk of transmission of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli from commercial broiler and free-range retail chicken in India India Observational 10886 10886 Production type Comparison of meat samples: broiler vs. free-range Free-range production Commercial production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 23 None None None None None 13 54 None None None 0.018 None
13927 13927 10294 None 10131 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02120 Hussain_2017_FrinMi Risk of transmission of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli from commercial broiler and free-range retail chicken in India India Observational 10886 10886 Production type Comparison of meat samples: broiler vs. free-range Free-range production Commercial production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 5 None None None None None 13 54 None None None >0.05 None
13928 13928 10294 None 10131 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02120 Hussain_2017_FrinMi Risk of transmission of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli from commercial broiler and free-range retail chicken in India India Observational 10886 10886 Production type Comparison of meat samples: broiler vs. free-range Free-range production Commercial production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 3 None None None None None 13 54 None None None >0.05 None
13929 13929 10294 None 10131 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02120 Hussain_2017_FrinMi Risk of transmission of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli from commercial broiler and free-range retail chicken in India India Observational 10885 10885 Production type Comparison of ceca samples: broiler vs. free-range Free-range production Commercial production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 25 None 54 None None None None None 46 55 None None None 0 None
13930 13930 10294 None 10131 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02120 Hussain_2017_FrinMi Risk of transmission of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli from commercial broiler and free-range retail chicken in India India Observational 10885 10885 Production type Comparison of ceca samples: broiler vs. free-range Free-range production Commercial production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 24 None 40 None None None None None 46 55 None None None 0.033 None
13931 13931 10294 None 10131 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02120 Hussain_2017_FrinMi Risk of transmission of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli from commercial broiler and free-range retail chicken in India India Observational 10885 10885 Production type Comparison of ceca samples: broiler vs. free-range Free-range production Commercial production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 26 None None None None None 46 55 None None None >0.05 None
13932 13932 10294 None 10131 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02120 Hussain_2017_FrinMi Risk of transmission of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli from commercial broiler and free-range retail chicken in India India Observational 10885 10885 Production type Comparison of ceca samples: broiler vs. free-range Free-range production Commercial production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 21 None None None None None 46 55 None None None 0.041 None
13933 13933 10294 None 10131 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02120 Hussain_2017_FrinMi Risk of transmission of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli from commercial broiler and free-range retail chicken in India India Observational 10885 10885 Production type Comparison of ceca samples: broiler vs. free-range Free-range production Commercial production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 8 None None None None None 46 55 None None None 0.007 None
13934 13934 10294 None 10131 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02120 Hussain_2017_FrinMi Risk of transmission of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli from commercial broiler and free-range retail chicken in India India Observational 10885 10885 Production type Comparison of ceca samples: broiler vs. free-range Free-range production Commercial production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 3 None None None None None 46 55 None None None >0.05 None
13936 13936 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10839 10839 Production type Production type Organic production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 19 10 None None None None None
13937 13937 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10839 10839 Production type Production type Organic production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 19 10 None None None None None
13938 13938 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10839 10839 Production type Production type Organic production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 19 10 None None None None None
13939 13939 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10839 10839 Production type Production type Organic production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 19 10 None None None None None
40216 40216 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11324 11324 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
13940 13940 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10839 10839 Production type Production type Organic production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 19 10 None None None None None
13941 13941 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10838 10838 Production type Production type Extensive indoor production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 24 10 None None None None None
13942 13942 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10838 10838 Production type Production type Extensive indoor production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 24 10 None None None None None
13943 13943 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10838 10838 Production type Production type Extensive indoor production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 24 10 None None None None None
13944 13944 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10838 10838 Production type Production type Extensive indoor production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 24 10 None None None None None
13945 13945 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10838 10838 Production type Production type Extensive indoor production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 24 10 None None None None None
13946 13946 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10838 10838 Production type Production type Extensive indoor production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Campylobacter jejuni False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 24 10 None None None None None
13947 13947 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10839 10839 Production type Production type Organic production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 2 2 None None None None None
13948 13948 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10839 10839 Production type Production type Organic production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 2 2 None None None None None
13949 13949 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10839 10839 Production type Production type Organic production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 2 2 None None None None None
13950 13950 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10839 10839 Production type Production type Organic production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 2 2 None None None None None
13951 13951 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10839 10839 Production type Production type Organic production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 2 2 None None None None None
13952 13952 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10839 10839 Production type Production type Organic production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 2 2 None None None None None
13953 13953 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10838 10838 Production type Production type Extensive indoor production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 5 2 None None None None None
13954 13954 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10838 10838 Production type Production type Extensive indoor production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 5 2 None None None None None
13955 13955 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10838 10838 Production type Production type Extensive indoor production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 5 2 None None None None None
13956 13956 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10838 10838 Production type Production type Extensive indoor production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 5 2 None None None None None
13957 13957 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10838 10838 Production type Production type Extensive indoor production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 5 2 None None None None None
13958 13958 10290 None 9912 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2001.00994.x Heuer_2001_LeinApMi Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of thermophilic campylobacter in organic and conventional broiler flocks Denmark Observational 10838 10838 Production type Production type Extensive indoor production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Campylobacter coli False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 5 2 None None None None None
13959 13959 10237 None 7377 10.1186/s12889-016-3377-2 Aliyu_2016_BMCPubHea Risk factors and spatial distribution of extended spectrum -lactamase-producing- Escherichia coli at retail poultry meat markets in Malaysia: A cross-sectional study Malaysia Observational 10695 10695 Stall sanitation Poor vs good; ESBL prevalence Poor stall sanitation Good stall sanitation Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 6.04 3.01 12.15 0.001 None
13960 13960 10246 None 7720 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.01.020 Baron_2016_VeteMicr Impact of the administration of a third-generation cephalosporin (3GC) to one-day-old chicks on the persistence of 3GC-resistant Escherichia coli in intestinal flora: An in vivo experiment France Experimental 10730 10730 Ceftiofur use Inoculated with E. coli 369; day 34 data Ceftiofur use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 6 None None None None None 9 8 None None None None None
13961 13961 10246 None 7720 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.01.020 Baron_2016_VeteMicr Impact of the administration of a third-generation cephalosporin (3GC) to one-day-old chicks on the persistence of 3GC-resistant Escherichia coli in intestinal flora: An in vivo experiment France Experimental 10729 10729 Ceftiofur use In contact with birds inoculated with E. coli 369; day 34 data Ceftiofur use No use Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 7 None 4 None None None None None 8 9 None None None None None
13962 13962 10286 None 9069 El.Rami_2012_PoJoofMi Identification and antibacterial resistance of bacteria isolated from poultry Lebanon Observational 10833 10833 Tetracycline, Erythromycin and Streptomycin use as growth promoters Growth promoter birds age 4 months (Group C) Control birds age 18 months, no antimicrobial growth promoter use (Group F). Tetracycline, Erythromycin and Streptomycin use as growth promoters No use of growth promoters Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 21 9 None None None None None
13963 13963 10286 None 9069 El.Rami_2012_PoJoofMi Identification and antibacterial resistance of bacteria isolated from poultry Lebanon Observational 10833 10833 Tetracycline, Erythromycin and Streptomycin use as growth promoters Growth promoter birds age 4 months (Group C) Control birds age 18 months, no antimicrobial growth promoter use (Group F). Tetracycline, Erythromycin and Streptomycin use as growth promoters No use of growth promoters Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 21 9 None None None None None
13964 13964 10286 None 9069 El.Rami_2012_PoJoofMi Identification and antibacterial resistance of bacteria isolated from poultry Lebanon Observational 10833 10833 Tetracycline, Erythromycin and Streptomycin use as growth promoters Growth promoter birds age 4 months (Group C) Control birds age 18 months, no antimicrobial growth promoter use (Group F). Tetracycline, Erythromycin and Streptomycin use as growth promoters No use of growth promoters Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 0 None None None None None 21 9 None None None None None
13965 13965 10286 None 9069 El.Rami_2012_PoJoofMi Identification and antibacterial resistance of bacteria isolated from poultry Lebanon Observational 10833 10833 Tetracycline, Erythromycin and Streptomycin use as growth promoters Growth promoter birds age 4 months (Group C) Control birds age 18 months, no antimicrobial growth promoter use (Group F). Tetracycline, Erythromycin and Streptomycin use as growth promoters No use of growth promoters Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 21 None 0 None None None None None 21 9 None None None None None
13966 13966 10286 None 9069 El.Rami_2012_PoJoofMi Identification and antibacterial resistance of bacteria isolated from poultry Lebanon Observational 10833 10833 Tetracycline, Erythromycin and Streptomycin use as growth promoters Growth promoter birds age 4 months (Group C) Control birds age 18 months, no antimicrobial growth promoter use (Group F). Tetracycline, Erythromycin and Streptomycin use as growth promoters No use of growth promoters Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 18 None 0 None None None None None 21 9 None None None None None
13967 13967 10286 None 9069 El.Rami_2012_PoJoofMi Identification and antibacterial resistance of bacteria isolated from poultry Lebanon Observational 10833 10833 Tetracycline, Erythromycin and Streptomycin use as growth promoters Growth promoter birds age 4 months (Group C) Control birds age 18 months, no antimicrobial growth promoter use (Group F). Tetracycline, Erythromycin and Streptomycin use as growth promoters No use of growth promoters Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 0 None None None None None 21 9 None None None None None
13968 13968 10286 None 9069 El.Rami_2012_PoJoofMi Identification and antibacterial resistance of bacteria isolated from poultry Lebanon Observational 10831 10831 Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim use as growth promoters Growth promoter birds age 11 months (Group D). Control birds age 18 months, no antimicrobial growth promoter use (Group F). Sulfamethoxazole / Trimethoprim use as growth promoters No use of growth promoters Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 14 9 None None None None None
13969 13969 10286 None 9069 El.Rami_2012_PoJoofMi Identification and antibacterial resistance of bacteria isolated from poultry Lebanon Observational 10831 10831 Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim use as growth promoters Growth promoter birds age 11 months (Group D). Control birds age 18 months, no antimicrobial growth promoter use (Group F). Sulfamethoxazole / Trimethoprim use as growth promoters No use of growth promoters Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 14 9 None None None None None
13970 13970 10286 None 9069 El.Rami_2012_PoJoofMi Identification and antibacterial resistance of bacteria isolated from poultry Lebanon Observational 10831 10831 Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim use as growth promoters Growth promoter birds age 11 months (Group D). Control birds age 18 months, no antimicrobial growth promoter use (Group F). Sulfamethoxazole / Trimethoprim use as growth promoters No use of growth promoters Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 14 9 None None None None None
13971 13971 10286 None 9069 El.Rami_2012_PoJoofMi Identification and antibacterial resistance of bacteria isolated from poultry Lebanon Observational 10831 10831 Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim use as growth promoters Growth promoter birds age 11 months (Group D). Control birds age 18 months, no antimicrobial growth promoter use (Group F). Sulfamethoxazole / Trimethoprim use as growth promoters No use of growth promoters Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 0 None None None None None 14 9 None None None None None
13972 13972 10286 None 9069 El.Rami_2012_PoJoofMi Identification and antibacterial resistance of bacteria isolated from poultry Lebanon Observational 10831 10831 Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim use as growth promoters Growth promoter birds age 11 months (Group D). Control birds age 18 months, no antimicrobial growth promoter use (Group F). Sulfamethoxazole / Trimethoprim use as growth promoters No use of growth promoters Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 14 9 None None None None None
13973 13973 10286 None 9069 El.Rami_2012_PoJoofMi Identification and antibacterial resistance of bacteria isolated from poultry Lebanon Observational 10831 10831 Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim use as growth promoters Growth promoter birds age 11 months (Group D). Control birds age 18 months, no antimicrobial growth promoter use (Group F). Sulfamethoxazole / Trimethoprim use as growth promoters No use of growth promoters Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 14 9 None None None None None
13974 13974 10286 None 9069 El.Rami_2012_PoJoofMi Identification and antibacterial resistance of bacteria isolated from poultry Lebanon Observational 10832 10832 Tetracycline use as growth promoter Growth promoter birds age 20 months (Group A). Control birds age 18 months, no antimicrobial growth promoter use (Group F). Tetracycline use as growth promoter No use of growth promoters Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 17 9 None None None None None
13975 13975 10286 None 9069 El.Rami_2012_PoJoofMi Identification and antibacterial resistance of bacteria isolated from poultry Lebanon Observational 10832 10832 Tetracycline use as growth promoter Growth promoter birds age 20 months (Group A). Control birds age 18 months, no antimicrobial growth promoter use (Group F). Tetracycline use as growth promoter No use of growth promoters Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 17 9 None None None None None
13976 13976 10286 None 9069 El.Rami_2012_PoJoofMi Identification and antibacterial resistance of bacteria isolated from poultry Lebanon Observational 10832 10832 Tetracycline use as growth promoter Growth promoter birds age 20 months (Group A). Control birds age 18 months, no antimicrobial growth promoter use (Group F). Tetracycline use as growth promoter No use of growth promoters Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 17 9 None None None None None
13977 13977 10286 None 9069 El.Rami_2012_PoJoofMi Identification and antibacterial resistance of bacteria isolated from poultry Lebanon Observational 10832 10832 Tetracycline use as growth promoter Growth promoter birds age 20 months (Group A). Control birds age 18 months, no antimicrobial growth promoter use (Group F). Tetracycline use as growth promoter No use of growth promoters Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 0 None None None None None 17 9 None None None None None
13978 13978 10286 None 9069 El.Rami_2012_PoJoofMi Identification and antibacterial resistance of bacteria isolated from poultry Lebanon Observational 10832 10832 Tetracycline use as growth promoter Growth promoter birds age 20 months (Group A). Control birds age 18 months, no antimicrobial growth promoter use (Group F). Tetracycline use as growth promoter No use of growth promoters Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 17 9 None None None None None
13979 13979 10286 None 9069 El.Rami_2012_PoJoofMi Identification and antibacterial resistance of bacteria isolated from poultry Lebanon Observational 10832 10832 Tetracycline use as growth promoter Growth promoter birds age 20 months (Group A). Control birds age 18 months, no antimicrobial growth promoter use (Group F). Tetracycline use as growth promoter No use of growth promoters Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 0 None None None None None 17 9 None None None None None
13980 13980 10287 None 9246 10.3382/ps/pew254 Feye_2016_PoulScie Inhibition of the virulence, antibiotic resistance, and fecal shedding of multiple antibiotic-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium in broilers fed Original XPCTM United States of America Experimental 10834 10834 Feed Type Chicks were 1 day old at start of study. Both groups were inoculated with Salmonella Typhimurium (days 2, 9, and 16). Exposed group received a finisher diet with 1.25 kg/MT XPC, starting on Day 21. Data here are from Day 35 (fecal sample). Original XPC (Fermentation Metabolites) in Feed Conventional Feed Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella None False None False None None None None 33.00 None 81.00 None 96 96 None None None None None
13981 13981 10287 None 9246 10.3382/ps/pew254 Feye_2016_PoulScie Inhibition of the virulence, antibiotic resistance, and fecal shedding of multiple antibiotic-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium in broilers fed Original XPCTM United States of America Experimental 10836 10836 Feed Type Chicks were 1 day old at start of study. Both groups were inoculated with Salmonella Typhimurium (days 2, 9, and 16). Exposed group received a finisher diet with 1.25 kg/MT XPC, starting on Day 21. Data here are from Day 49 (intestinal sample). Original XPC (Fermentation Metabolites) in Feed Conventional Feed Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella None False None False None None None None 15.00 None 75.00 None 96 96 None None None None None
13982 13982 10287 None 9246 10.3382/ps/pew254 Feye_2016_PoulScie Inhibition of the virulence, antibiotic resistance, and fecal shedding of multiple antibiotic-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium in broilers fed Original XPCTM United States of America Experimental 10835 10835 Feed Type Chicks were 1 day old at start of study. Both groups were inoculated with Salmonella Typhimurium (days 2, 9, and 16). Exposed group received a finisher diet with 1.25 kg/MT XPC, starting on Day 21. Data here are from Day 42 (fecal sample). Original XPC (Fermentation Metabolites) in Feed Conventional Feed Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella None False None False None None None None 15.00 None 78.00 None 96 96 None None None None None
13984 13984 10139 None 14808 10.2134/jeq2015.05.0245 Zwonitzer2016 Quantifying attachment and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli from conventional and organic swine manure United States of America Observational 10393 10393 Production type Organic vs. conventional production. Organic used no antibiotics. Conventional used NT-80 in feed or Tylan Organic production Conventional production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 35 None 129 None None None None None 184 307 None None None None None
13986 13986 10139 None 14808 10.2134/jeq2015.05.0245 Zwonitzer2016 Quantifying attachment and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli from conventional and organic swine manure United States of America Observational 10393 10393 Production type Organic vs. conventional production. Organic used no antibiotics. Conventional used NT-80 in feed or Tylan Organic production Conventional production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 53 None 146 None None None None None 184 307 None None None None None
13987 13987 10139 None 14808 10.2134/jeq2015.05.0245 Zwonitzer2016 Quantifying attachment and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli from conventional and organic swine manure United States of America Observational 10393 10393 Production type Organic vs. conventional production. Organic used no antibiotics. Conventional used NT-80 in feed or Tylan Organic production Conventional production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 47 None 71 None None None None None 184 307 None None None None None
13988 13988 10139 None 14808 10.2134/jeq2015.05.0245 Zwonitzer2016 Quantifying attachment and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli from conventional and organic swine manure United States of America Observational 10393 10393 Production type Organic vs. conventional production. Organic used no antibiotics. Conventional used NT-80 in feed or Tylan Organic production Conventional production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines chlortetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 113 None 252 None None None None None 183 307 None None None None None
13989 13989 10139 None 14808 10.2134/jeq2015.05.0245 Zwonitzer2016 Quantifying attachment and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli from conventional and organic swine manure United States of America Observational 10393 10393 Production type Organic vs. conventional production. Organic used no antibiotics. Conventional used NT-80 in feed or Tylan Organic production Conventional production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Escherichia coli False None False 140 None 291 None None None None None 184 307 None None None None None
13990 13990 10139 None 14808 10.2134/jeq2015.05.0245 Zwonitzer2016 Quantifying attachment and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli from conventional and organic swine manure United States of America Observational 10393 10393 Production type Organic vs. conventional production. Organic used no antibiotics. Conventional used NT-80 in feed or Tylan Organic production Conventional production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 44 None 57 None None None None None 184 307 None None None None None
13991 13991 10139 None 14808 10.2134/jeq2015.05.0245 Zwonitzer2016 Quantifying attachment and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli from conventional and organic swine manure United States of America Observational 10393 10393 Production type Organic vs. conventional production. Organic used no antibiotics. Conventional used NT-80 in feed or Tylan Organic production Conventional production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False 68 None 174 None None None None None 184 301 None None None None None
13992 13992 10139 None 14808 10.2134/jeq2015.05.0245 Zwonitzer2016 Quantifying attachment and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli from conventional and organic swine manure United States of America Observational 10393 10393 Production type Organic vs. conventional production. Organic used no antibiotics. Conventional used NT-80 in feed or Tylan Organic production Conventional production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 67 None 68 None None None None None 184 291 None None None None None
13993 13993 10139 None 14808 10.2134/jeq2015.05.0245 Zwonitzer2016 Quantifying attachment and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli from conventional and organic swine manure United States of America Observational 10393 10393 Production type Organic vs. conventional production. Organic used no antibiotics. Conventional used NT-80 in feed or Tylan Organic production Conventional production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 52 None 133 None None None None None 184 307 None None None None None
13994 13994 10139 None 14808 10.2134/jeq2015.05.0245 Zwonitzer2016 Quantifying attachment and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli from conventional and organic swine manure United States of America Observational 10393 10393 Production type Organic vs. conventional production. Organic used no antibiotics. Conventional used NT-80 in feed or Tylan Organic production Conventional production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 133 None 238 None None None None None 169 273 None None None None None
13995 13995 10139 None 14808 10.2134/jeq2015.05.0245 Zwonitzer2016 Quantifying attachment and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli from conventional and organic swine manure United States of America Observational 10393 10393 Production type Organic vs. conventional production. Organic used no antibiotics. Conventional used NT-80 in feed or Tylan Organic production Conventional production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides, plain and in combinations sulfadimidine None Escherichia coli False None False 128 None 208 None None None None None 169 262 None None None None None
13996 13996 10139 None 14808 10.2134/jeq2015.05.0245 Zwonitzer2016 Quantifying attachment and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli from conventional and organic swine manure United States of America Observational 10393 10393 Production type Organic vs. conventional production. Organic used no antibiotics. Conventional used NT-80 in feed or Tylan Organic production Conventional production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 151 None 277 None None None None None 184 307 None None None None None
13997 13997 10139 None 14808 10.2134/jeq2015.05.0245 Zwonitzer2016 Quantifying attachment and antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli from conventional and organic swine manure United States of America Observational 10393 10393 Production type Organic vs. conventional production. Organic used no antibiotics. Conventional used NT-80 in feed or Tylan Organic production Conventional production Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Escherichia coli False None False 162 None 292 None None None None None 184 307 None None None None None
13998 13998 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10971 10971 Tetracycline use Systemic tetracycline use. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Tetracycline use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.43 0.17 1.11 0.08 None
13999 13999 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10967 10967 Penicillin use Systemic penicillin use. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Penicillin use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 5.58 2.28 13.65 <0.01 None
14000 14000 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10963 10963 Erythromycin use Systemic erythromycin use. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Erythromycin use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.10 0.01 1.01 0.05 None
14001 14001 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10958 10958 Barn type N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Tie-stall Freestall Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.13 0.31 14.48 0.43 None
14002 14002 10237 None 7377 10.1186/s12889-016-3377-2 Aliyu_2016_BMCPubHea Risk factors and spatial distribution of extended spectrum -lactamase-producing- Escherichia coli at retail poultry meat markets in Malaysia: A cross-sectional study Malaysia Observational 10698 10698 Type of counter top Wooden vs stainless steel; ESBL prevalence Wooden counter Stainless steel counter Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 8.13 2.51 26.31 0.001 None
14003 14003 10237 None 7377 10.1186/s12889-016-3377-2 Aliyu_2016_BMCPubHea Risk factors and spatial distribution of extended spectrum -lactamase-producing- Escherichia coli at retail poultry meat markets in Malaysia: A cross-sectional study Malaysia Observational 10697 10697 Type of counter top Tile vs stainless steel; ESBL prevalence Tile counter Stainless steel counter Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.21 2.13 8.31 0.001 None
14004 14004 10237 None 7377 10.1186/s12889-016-3377-2 Aliyu_2016_BMCPubHea Risk factors and spatial distribution of extended spectrum -lactamase-producing- Escherichia coli at retail poultry meat markets in Malaysia: A cross-sectional study Malaysia Observational 10696 10696 Type of counter top Plastic vs stainless steel; ESBL prevalence Plastic counter Stainless steel counter Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.69 1.66 8.22 0.001 None
14005 14005 10237 None 7377 10.1186/s12889-016-3377-2 Aliyu_2016_BMCPubHea Risk factors and spatial distribution of extended spectrum -lactamase-producing- Escherichia coli at retail poultry meat markets in Malaysia: A cross-sectional study Malaysia Observational 10693 10693 Source of cleaning water Container vs tap; ESBL prevalence Container water Tap water Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.17 1.21 8.30 0.0499 None
14006 14006 10237 None 7377 10.1186/s12889-016-3377-2 Aliyu_2016_BMCPubHea Risk factors and spatial distribution of extended spectrum -lactamase-producing- Escherichia coli at retail poultry meat markets in Malaysia: A cross-sectional study Malaysia Observational 10700 10700 Type of cutting board/instrument Wooden vs stainless steel cutter; ESBL prevalence Wooden Stainless steel cutter Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 5.50 2.05 14.76 0.0499 None
14007 14007 10237 None 7377 10.1186/s12889-016-3377-2 Aliyu_2016_BMCPubHea Risk factors and spatial distribution of extended spectrum -lactamase-producing- Escherichia coli at retail poultry meat markets in Malaysia: A cross-sectional study Malaysia Observational 10699 10699 Type of cutting board/instrument Plastic vs stainless steel cutter; ESBL prevalence Plastic Stainless steel cutter Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.42 1.02 5.76 0.0499 None
14008 14008 10237 None 7377 10.1186/s12889-016-3377-2 Aliyu_2016_BMCPubHea Risk factors and spatial distribution of extended spectrum -lactamase-producing- Escherichia coli at retail poultry meat markets in Malaysia: A cross-sectional study Malaysia Observational 10703 10703 Wearing working attire ESBL prevalence No work attire Yes work attire Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.35 0.42 4.38 None None
14009 14009 10237 None 7377 10.1186/s12889-016-3377-2 Aliyu_2016_BMCPubHea Risk factors and spatial distribution of extended spectrum -lactamase-producing- Escherichia coli at retail poultry meat markets in Malaysia: A cross-sectional study Malaysia Observational 10692 10692 Butcher's sanitation Poor vs good; ESBL prevalence Poor butcher's sanitation Good butcher's sanitation Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.35 0.42 4.38 None None
14010 14010 10237 None 7377 10.1186/s12889-016-3377-2 Aliyu_2016_BMCPubHea Risk factors and spatial distribution of extended spectrum -lactamase-producing- Escherichia coli at retail poultry meat markets in Malaysia: A cross-sectional study Malaysia Observational 10691 10691 Butcher's sanitation Fair vs good; ESBL prevalence Fair butcher's sanitation Good butcher's sanitation Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.85 0.32 10.55 None None
14011 14011 10237 None 7377 10.1186/s12889-016-3377-2 Aliyu_2016_BMCPubHea Risk factors and spatial distribution of extended spectrum -lactamase-producing- Escherichia coli at retail poultry meat markets in Malaysia: A cross-sectional study Malaysia Observational 10702 10702 Use of PPE Poor vs good; ESBL prevalence Poor PPE Good PPE Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.40 0.40 4.86 None None
14012 14012 10237 None 7377 10.1186/s12889-016-3377-2 Aliyu_2016_BMCPubHea Risk factors and spatial distribution of extended spectrum -lactamase-producing- Escherichia coli at retail poultry meat markets in Malaysia: A cross-sectional study Malaysia Observational 10701 10701 Use of PPE Fair vs good; ESBL prevalence Fair PPE Good PPE Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Odds Ratio Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.33 0.41 4.37 None None
14013 14013 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10965 10965 Penicillin combination use Combination penicillin use for lactating cow therapy. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Penicillin use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.84 0.94 3.61 0.07 None
14014 14014 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10959 10959 Ceftiofur use Ceftiofur use for lactating cow therapy. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Ceftiofur use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 162.43 2.20 11958.00 0.02 None
14015 14015 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10968 10968 Penicillin-novobiocin use Penicillin-novobiocin use for dry cow therapy. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Penicillin-novobiocin use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 32.13 2.23 461.09 0.01 None
14016 14016 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10962 10962 Cloxacillin use Cloxacillin use for dry cow therapy. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Cloxacillin use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 25.76 1.54 428.63 0.02 None
14017 14017 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10961 10961 Cephapirin use Cephapirin use for dry cow therapy. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Cephapirin use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 188.74 3.90 9133.00 0.008 None
14018 14018 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10967 10967 Penicillin use Systemic penicillin use. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Penicillin use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.72 1.14 6.48 0.02 None
14019 14019 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10963 10963 Erythromycin use Systemic erythromycin use. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Erythromycin use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.01 0.00 0.82 0.04 None
14020 14020 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10958 10958 Barn type N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Tie-stall Freestall Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 15.29 0.61 379.47 0.09 None
14021 14021 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10965 10965 Penicillin combination use Combination penicillin use for lactating cow therapy. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Penicillin use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.18 0.93 1.49 0.16 None
14022 14022 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10971 10971 Tetracycline use Systemic tetracycline use. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Tetracycline use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.25 0.08 0.78 0.01 None
14023 14023 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10967 10967 Penicillin use Systemic penicillin use. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Penicillin use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.75 1.38 5.47 <0.01 None
14024 14024 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10958 10958 Barn type N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Tie-stall Freestall Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.14 0.19 6.60 0.88 None
14025 14025 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10968 10968 Penicillin-novobiocin use Penicillin-novobiocin use for dry cow therapy. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Penicillin-novobiocin use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 5.28 0.93 30.07 0.06 None
14026 14026 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10961 10961 Cephapirin use Cephapirin use for dry cow therapy. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Cephapirin use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 8.72 1.08 70.19 0.04 None
14027 14027 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10962 10962 Cloxacillin use Cloxacillin use for dry cow therapy. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Cloxacillin use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 9.31 1.23 70.37 0.03 None
14028 14028 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10958 10958 Barn type N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Tie-stall Freestall Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.79 0.50 28.77 0.19 None
14029 14029 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10970 10970 Sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim use Systemic sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim use. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.01 0.93 4.35 0.07 None
14030 14030 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10959 10959 Ceftiofur use Ceftiofur use for lactating cow therapy. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Ceftiofur use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 56.65 1.90 1688.00 0.02 None
14031 14031 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10966 10966 Penicillin combination use Penicillin combination use for lactating cow therapy. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Penicillin combination use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.15 1.38 12.48 0.01 None
14032 14032 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10969 10969 Pirlimycin use Pirlimycin use for lactating cow therapy. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Pirlimycin use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.37 0.12 1.18 0.09 None
14033 14033 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10958 10958 Barn type N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Tie-stall Freestall Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.67 0.19 36.46 0.46 None
14034 14034 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10970 10970 Sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim use Systemic sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim use. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 4.66 1.75 12.39 <0.01 None
14035 14035 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10958 10958 Barn type N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Tie-stall Freestall Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.62 0.29 9.11 0.58 None
14036 14036 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10959 10959 Ceftiofur use Ceftiofur use for lactating cow therapy. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Ceftiofur use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.26 0.00 17.65 0.53 None
14038 14038 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10971 10971 Tetracycline use Systemic tetracycline use. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Tetracycline use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.13 0.01 0.97 0.04 None
14039 14039 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10960 10960 Ceftiofur use Systemic ceftiofur use. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Ceftiofur use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.16 0.02 0.96 0.04 None
14040 14040 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10958 10958 Barn type N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Tie-stall Freestall Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 5.56 0.36 85.89 0.21 None
14041 14041 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10964 10964 Florfenicol use Systemic florfenicol use. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Florfenicol use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.08 0.01 1.16 0.06 None
14042 14042 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10967 10967 Penicillin use Systemic penicillin use. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Penicillin use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 3.04 0.87 10.61 0.08 None
14043 14043 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10971 10971 Tetracycline use Systemic tetracycline use. N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Tetracycline use No use Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 0.01 0.00 0.86 0.04 None
14044 14044 10324 None 12997 10.3168/jds.2012-5713 Saini_2013_JoofDaSc Herd-level relationship between antimicrobial use and presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bovine mastitis pathogens on Canadian dairy farms Canada Observational 10958 10958 Barn type N = 394 isolates from bovine IMI and (sub)clinical mastitis cases on 76 dairy farms Tie-stall Freestall Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Odds Ratio Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None None None None None None None 1.16 0.09 14.69 0.9 None
14051 14051 10275 None 8747 10.2527/jas1977.4561239x Dealy_1977_Joofansc Effect of bambermycins on Escherichia coli and antibiotic resistance in calves United States of America Experimental 10811 10811 Bambermycin use 44.0 mg bambermycins per kilogram in feed. Bambermycin use No use Cattle Beef Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 6.90 None 8.40 None 280 280 None None None None None
14052 14052 10275 None 8747 10.2527/jas1977.4561239x Dealy_1977_Joofansc Effect of bambermycins on Escherichia coli and antibiotic resistance in calves United States of America Experimental 10811 10811 Bambermycin use 44.0 mg bambermycins per kilogram in feed. Bambermycin use No use Cattle Beef Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Polymyxins colistin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 7.40 None 3.70 None 280 280 None None None None None
14053 14053 10275 None 8747 10.2527/jas1977.4561239x Dealy_1977_Joofansc Effect of bambermycins on Escherichia coli and antibiotic resistance in calves United States of America Experimental 10811 10811 Bambermycin use 44.0 mg bambermycins per kilogram in feed. Bambermycin use No use Cattle Beef Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics bambermycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 8.70 None 2.50 None 280 280 None None None None None
14054 14054 10275 None 8747 10.2527/jas1977.4561239x Dealy_1977_Joofansc Effect of bambermycins on Escherichia coli and antibiotic resistance in calves United States of America Experimental 10811 10811 Bambermycin use 44.0 mg bambermycins per kilogram in feed. Bambermycin use No use Cattle Beef Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 12.40 None 13.60 None 280 280 None None None None None
14055 14055 10275 None 8747 10.2527/jas1977.4561239x Dealy_1977_Joofansc Effect of bambermycins on Escherichia coli and antibiotic resistance in calves United States of America Experimental 10811 10811 Bambermycin use 44.0 mg bambermycins per kilogram in feed. Bambermycin use No use Cattle Beef Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 37.10 None 46.40 None 280 280 None None None None None
14056 14056 10275 None 8747 10.2527/jas1977.4561239x Dealy_1977_Joofansc Effect of bambermycins on Escherichia coli and antibiotic resistance in calves United States of America Experimental 10811 10811 Bambermycin use 44.0 mg bambermycins per kilogram in feed. Bambermycin use No use Cattle Beef Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 41.00 None 66.50 None 280 280 None None None None None
14057 14057 10275 None 8747 10.2527/jas1977.4561239x Dealy_1977_Joofansc Effect of bambermycins on Escherichia coli and antibiotic resistance in calves United States of America Experimental 10811 10811 Bambermycin use 44.0 mg bambermycins per kilogram in feed. Bambermycin use No use Cattle Beef Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfadiazine and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 35.40 None 38.00 None 280 280 None None None None None
14060 14060 10276 None 8748 10.2527/jas1977.445734x Dealy_1977_Joofansc_1 Influence of bambermycins on Salmonella infection and antibiotic resistance in calves United States of America Experimental 10812 10812 Bambermycin use 44.0 mg bambermycins per kilogram feed in tx group. Bambermycin use No use Cattle Beef Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 80.90 19.10 94.80 5.20 39 48 None None None None None
14061 14061 10276 None 8748 10.2527/jas1977.445734x Dealy_1977_Joofansc_1 Influence of bambermycins on Salmonella infection and antibiotic resistance in calves United States of America Experimental 10812 10812 Bambermycin use 44.0 mg bambermycins per kilogram feed in tx group. Bambermycin use No use Cattle Beef Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 82.20 17.80 96.20 3.80 39 48 None None None None None
14062 14062 10276 None 8748 10.2527/jas1977.445734x Dealy_1977_Joofansc_1 Influence of bambermycins on Salmonella infection and antibiotic resistance in calves United States of America Experimental 10812 10812 Bambermycin use 44.0 mg bambermycins per kilogram feed in tx group. Bambermycin use No use Cattle Beef Calves None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 40.00 60.00 81.80 18.20 39 48 None None None None None
14063 14063 10129 None 14119 10.1128/aem.01682-17 Vikram2017 Impact of raised without antibiotics beef cattle production practices on occurrences of antimicrobial resistance United States of America Observational 10374 10374 Conventional Vs. raised without antibiotics Conventional Vs. raised without antibiotics conventional raised without antibiotics Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 71.40 None 60.60 None 720 718 None None None None None
14064 14064 10129 None 14119 10.1128/aem.01682-17 Vikram2017 Impact of raised without antibiotics beef cattle production practices on occurrences of antimicrobial resistance United States of America Observational 10374 10374 Conventional Vs. raised without antibiotics Conventional Vs. raised without antibiotics conventional raised without antibiotics Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 47.50 None 34.80 None 720 718 None None None None None
14065 14065 10255 None 8104 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.08.005 Brunton_2014_PrevVeteMedi A longitudinal field trial assesing the impact of feeding waste milk containing antibiotic residues on the prevalence of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in calves None None 10775 10775 None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None False None False None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
14066 14066 10326 None 13074 10.3168/jds.2016-11839 Santman.Berends_2017_JoofDaSc Prevalence and risk factors for extended-spectrum -lactamase or AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in organic dairy herds in the Netherlands Netherlands Other 10981 10981 Presence of Horses Presence of horses on the farm. AMR- counts pertain to ESBL/AmpC-unsuspected herds, and AMR+ counts pertain to ESBL-AmpC-positive herds. Horses Present No Horses Present Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd None None None Escherichia coli False None False 1 29 11 49 None None None None 30 60 None None None None None
14067 14067 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10732 10732 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific AMs available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. AMR is for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 47 None None None None None 72 84 None None None None None
14068 14068 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10734 10734 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. AMR is for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 18 None None None None None 59 73 None None None None None
14069 14069 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10731 10731 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 44 None 58 None None None None None 72 84 None None None None None
14070 14070 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10733 10733 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 29 None 30 None None None None None 59 73 None None None None None
14071 14071 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10731 10731 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 47 None None None None None 72 84 None None None None None
14072 14072 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10733 10733 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 18 None None None None None 59 73 None None None None None
14073 14073 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10731 10731 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 14 None 47 None None None None None 72 84 None None None None None
14074 14074 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10733 10733 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 18 None None None None None 59 73 None None None None None
14075 14075 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10731 10731 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 4 None None None None None 72 84 None None None None None
14076 14076 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10733 10733 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 3 None None None None None 59 73 None None None None None
14077 14077 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10731 10731 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 27 None None None None None 72 84 None None None None None
14078 14078 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10733 10733 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 19 None None None None None 59 73 None None None None None
14079 14079 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10731 10731 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 50 None 64 None None None None None 72 84 None None None None None
14080 14080 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10733 10733 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 34 None 35 None None None None None 59 73 None None None None None
14081 14081 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10731 10731 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False 48 None 61 None None None None None 72 84 None None None None None
14082 14082 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10733 10733 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False 31 None 31 None None None None None 59 73 None None None None None
14083 14083 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10731 10731 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 27 None 33 None None None None None 72 84 None None None None None
14084 14084 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10733 10733 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 20 None None None None None 59 73 None None None None None
14085 14085 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10731 10731 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 53 None 78 None None None None None 72 84 None None None None None
14086 14086 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10733 10733 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 34 None 53 None None None None None 59 73 None None None None None
14087 14087 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10731 10731 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 10 None 27 None None None None None 72 84 None None None None None
14088 14088 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10733 10733 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 18 None None None None None 59 73 None None None None None
14089 14089 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10731 10731 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 72 84 None None None None None
14091 14091 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10733 10733 Antimicrobial Therapy Group 2 vs Group 3 (see Table 1 for criteria for clinical diagnosis and specific Ams available). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available) Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 59 73 None None None None None
14092 14092 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10738 10738 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 83 None 15 None None None None None 90 72 None None None None None
14093 14093 10008 None 10404 10.1136/vr.101759 Jones2013 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli found in GB turkey flocks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10020 10020 Feed sourced from national (GB) compounder In fattening turkeys Yes No Turkey Fattening Turkeys None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Flock Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 60.80 None 44.20 None 97 138 None None None None None
14094 14094 10008 None 10404 10.1136/vr.101759 Jones2013 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli found in GB turkey flocks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10016 10016 Antimicrobial treatment given during life of flock In fattening turkeys Yes No Turkey Fattening Turkeys None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Flock Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 56.80 None 48.20 None 88 141 None None None None None
14095 14095 10008 None 10404 10.1136/vr.101759 Jones2013 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli found in GB turkey flocks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10021 10021 Flock divided by house partitions In fattening turkeys Yes No Turkey Fattening Turkeys None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Flock Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 43.80 None 52.80 None 64 159 None None None None None
14096 14096 10008 None 10404 10.1136/vr.101759 Jones2013 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli found in GB turkey flocks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10019 10019 Disinfection Floors and walls disinfected at depopulation; In fattening turkeys Yes No Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Flock Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 49.50 None 73.30 None 218 15 None None None None None
14097 14097 10008 None 10404 10.1136/vr.101759 Jones2013 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli found in GB turkey flocks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10014 10014 Age of youngest birds in flock In fattening turkeys > or = 105 days < 105 days Turkey Fattening Turkeys None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Flock Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 45.50 None 72.90 None 187 48 None None None None None
14098 14098 10008 None 10404 10.1136/vr.101759 Jones2013 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli found in GB turkey flocks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10017 10017 Any evidence of mice In fattening turkeys Yes No Turkey Fattening Turkeys None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Flock Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 57.90 None 47.80 None 76 157 None None None None None
14099 14099 10060 None 11765 10.3382/ps.2007-00485 Miranda2008a Evolution of resistance in poultry intestinal Escherichia coli during three commonly used antimicrobial therapeutic treatments in poultry Spain Experimental 10157 10157 Enrofloxacin use Therapeutic dose of enrofloxacin in water (0.05 g/L) for 5 days; samples taken on day 17 Enrofloxacin use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 16 None 4 None None None None None 18 18 None None None None None
14100 14100 10060 None 11765 10.3382/ps.2007-00485 Miranda2008a Evolution of resistance in poultry intestinal Escherichia coli during three commonly used antimicrobial therapeutic treatments in poultry Spain Experimental 10156 10156 Doxycycline use Therapeutic dose of doxycycline in water (1 g/L) for 5 days; samples taken on day 12 Doxycycline use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines doxycycline None Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 3 None None None None None 18 18 None None None None None
14101 14101 10060 None 11765 10.3382/ps.2007-00485 Miranda2008a Evolution of resistance in poultry intestinal Escherichia coli during three commonly used antimicrobial therapeutic treatments in poultry Spain Experimental 10158 10158 Sulphonamides use Therapeutic dose of a sulfonamides mixture (1.33 g of Sulfaquinoxaline + 1.66 g of Sulfamethazine + 1.66 g of Sulfameracine + 3.33 g of Sulfisoxazole/100 mL) in water (15 mL/L) for 4 days; samples taken on day 24 Sulphonamides use No use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 17 None 11 None None None None None 18 18 None None None None None
14103 14103 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10740 10740 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 70 None 8 None None None None None 81 59 None None None None None
14104 14104 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10738 10738 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 90 None 44 None None None None None 90 72 None None None None None
14105 14105 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10740 10740 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 78 None 29 None None None None None 81 59 None None None None None
14106 14106 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10737 10737 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia None False None False 83 None 15 None None None None None 90 72 None None None None None
14107 14107 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10739 10739 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia None False None False 70 None 8 None None None None None 81 59 None None None None None
14108 14108 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10737 10737 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia None False None False 83 None 14 None None None None None 90 72 None None None None None
14109 14109 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10739 10739 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia None False None False 70 None 8 None None None None None 81 59 None None None None None
14110 14110 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10737 10737 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia None False None False 50 None 0 None None None None None 90 72 None None None None None
14111 14111 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10739 10739 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia None False None False 48 None 0 None None None None None 81 59 None None None None None
14112 14112 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10737 10737 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia None False None False 78 None 13 None None None None None 90 72 None None None None None
14113 14113 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10739 10739 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia None False None False 63 None 13 None None None None None 81 59 None None None None None
14114 14114 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10737 10737 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia None False None False 90 None 50 None None None None None 90 72 None None None None None
14115 14115 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10739 10739 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia None False None False 81 None 34 None None None None None 81 59 None None None None None
14116 14116 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10737 10737 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia None False None False 90 None 48 None None None None None 90 72 None None None None None
14117 14117 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10739 10739 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia None False None False 81 None 31 None None None None None 81 59 None None None None None
14118 14118 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10738 10738 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 85 None 27 None None None None None 90 72 None None None None None
14119 14119 10318 None 12153 O.Connor_2002_CaJoofVeRe Changes in the prevalence of resistant Escherichia coli in cattle receiving subcutaneously injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline compared with cattle receiving only in-feed chlortetracycline Canada Observational 10942 10942 in-feed chlortetracycline vs. injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline prescribed in-feed chlortetracycline (daily dose of 8 mg/lb BW for approximately 8 d and then 3 mg/lb BW for approximately 8 d) Vs. injectable oxytetracycline (9 mg/lb BW) in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline in-feed chlortetracycline Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 30 None 28 None None None None None 39 44 None None None None None
14120 14120 10318 None 12153 O.Connor_2002_CaJoofVeRe Changes in the prevalence of resistant Escherichia coli in cattle receiving subcutaneously injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline compared with cattle receiving only in-feed chlortetracycline Canada Observational 10942 10942 in-feed chlortetracycline vs. injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline prescribed in-feed chlortetracycline (daily dose of 8 mg/lb BW for approximately 8 d and then 3 mg/lb BW for approximately 8 d) Vs. injectable oxytetracycline (9 mg/lb BW) in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline in-feed chlortetracycline Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 9 None None None None None 39 44 None None None None None
14121 14121 10318 None 12153 O.Connor_2002_CaJoofVeRe Changes in the prevalence of resistant Escherichia coli in cattle receiving subcutaneously injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline compared with cattle receiving only in-feed chlortetracycline Canada Observational 10942 10942 in-feed chlortetracycline vs. injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline prescribed in-feed chlortetracycline (daily dose of 8 mg/lb BW for approximately 8 d and then 3 mg/lb BW for approximately 8 d) Vs. injectable oxytetracycline (9 mg/lb BW) in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline in-feed chlortetracycline Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 8 None None None None None 39 44 None None None None None
14122 14122 10318 None 12153 O.Connor_2002_CaJoofVeRe Changes in the prevalence of resistant Escherichia coli in cattle receiving subcutaneously injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline compared with cattle receiving only in-feed chlortetracycline Canada Observational 10942 10942 in-feed chlortetracycline vs. injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline prescribed in-feed chlortetracycline (daily dose of 8 mg/lb BW for approximately 8 d and then 3 mg/lb BW for approximately 8 d) Vs. injectable oxytetracycline (9 mg/lb BW) in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline in-feed chlortetracycline Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 6 None None None None None 39 44 None None None None None
14123 14123 10318 None 12153 O.Connor_2002_CaJoofVeRe Changes in the prevalence of resistant Escherichia coli in cattle receiving subcutaneously injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline compared with cattle receiving only in-feed chlortetracycline Canada Observational 10942 10942 in-feed chlortetracycline vs. injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline prescribed in-feed chlortetracycline (daily dose of 8 mg/lb BW for approximately 8 d and then 3 mg/lb BW for approximately 8 d) Vs. injectable oxytetracycline (9 mg/lb BW) in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline in-feed chlortetracycline Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 2 None None None None None 39 44 None None None None None
14124 14124 10318 None 12153 O.Connor_2002_CaJoofVeRe Changes in the prevalence of resistant Escherichia coli in cattle receiving subcutaneously injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline compared with cattle receiving only in-feed chlortetracycline Canada Observational 10942 10942 in-feed chlortetracycline vs. injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline prescribed in-feed chlortetracycline (daily dose of 8 mg/lb BW for approximately 8 d and then 3 mg/lb BW for approximately 8 d) Vs. injectable oxytetracycline (9 mg/lb BW) in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline in-feed chlortetracycline Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 4 None None None None None 39 44 None None None None None
14125 14125 10318 None 12153 O.Connor_2002_CaJoofVeRe Changes in the prevalence of resistant Escherichia coli in cattle receiving subcutaneously injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline compared with cattle receiving only in-feed chlortetracycline Canada Observational 10942 10942 in-feed chlortetracycline vs. injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline prescribed in-feed chlortetracycline (daily dose of 8 mg/lb BW for approximately 8 d and then 3 mg/lb BW for approximately 8 d) Vs. injectable oxytetracycline (9 mg/lb BW) in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline in-feed chlortetracycline Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 4 None None None None None 39 44 None None None None None
14126 14126 10318 None 12153 O.Connor_2002_CaJoofVeRe Changes in the prevalence of resistant Escherichia coli in cattle receiving subcutaneously injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline compared with cattle receiving only in-feed chlortetracycline Canada Observational 10942 10942 in-feed chlortetracycline vs. injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline prescribed in-feed chlortetracycline (daily dose of 8 mg/lb BW for approximately 8 d and then 3 mg/lb BW for approximately 8 d) Vs. injectable oxytetracycline (9 mg/lb BW) in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline in-feed chlortetracycline Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 5 None None None None None 39 44 None None None None None
14127 14127 10318 None 12153 O.Connor_2002_CaJoofVeRe Changes in the prevalence of resistant Escherichia coli in cattle receiving subcutaneously injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline compared with cattle receiving only in-feed chlortetracycline Canada Observational 10942 10942 in-feed chlortetracycline vs. injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline prescribed in-feed chlortetracycline (daily dose of 8 mg/lb BW for approximately 8 d and then 3 mg/lb BW for approximately 8 d) Vs. injectable oxytetracycline (9 mg/lb BW) in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline in-feed chlortetracycline Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 9 None None None None None 39 44 None None None None None
14128 14128 10318 None 12153 O.Connor_2002_CaJoofVeRe Changes in the prevalence of resistant Escherichia coli in cattle receiving subcutaneously injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline compared with cattle receiving only in-feed chlortetracycline Canada Observational 10942 10942 in-feed chlortetracycline vs. injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline prescribed in-feed chlortetracycline (daily dose of 8 mg/lb BW for approximately 8 d and then 3 mg/lb BW for approximately 8 d) Vs. injectable oxytetracycline (9 mg/lb BW) in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline injectable oxytetracycline in addition to in-feed chlortetracycline in-feed chlortetracycline Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False 32 None 23 None None None None None 39 44 None None None None None
14132 14132 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10740 10740 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 75 None 16 None None None None None 81 59 None None None None None
14133 14133 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10738 10738 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 90 None 53 None None None None None 90 72 None None None None None
14134 14134 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10740 10740 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 81 None 34 None None None None None 81 59 None None None None None
14135 14135 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10738 10738 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 85 None 10 None None None None None 90 72 None None None None None
14136 14136 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10740 10740 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 69 None 6 None None None None None 81 59 None None None None None
14137 14137 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10738 10738 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 14. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 90 72 None None None None None
14138 14138 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10740 10740 Antimicrobial Use Group 2 vs Group 4 (see Table 1 for therapeutic indications, milk replacer contains tetracycline hydrochloride (22 mg/kg body weight/day) and neomycin sulfate (22 mg/kg/day)). Both groups were housed on a calf ranch. Data is from Day 28. Group 4 (antimicrobial therapy available and medicated milk replacer) Group 2 (no antimicrobial therapy available, non-medicated milk replacer) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 8 None 0 None None None None None 81 59 None None None None None
14139 14139 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10741 10741 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 14. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 19 None 15 None None None None None 66 72 None None None None None
14140 14140 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10742 10742 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 28. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 8 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
14141 14141 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10741 10741 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 14. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 31 None 44 None None None None None 66 72 None None None None None
14142 14142 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10742 10742 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 28. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 29 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
14143 14143 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10741 10741 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 14. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False 19 None 15 None None None None None 66 72 None None None None None
14144 14144 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10742 10742 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 28. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 8 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
14145 14145 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10741 10741 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 14. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 18 None 14 None None None None None 66 72 None None None None None
14146 14146 10008 None 10404 10.1136/vr.101759 Jones2013 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli found in GB turkey flocks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10029 10029 Number of birds on farm In breeding turkeys > 10,000 < 10,000 Turkey Breeding Turkeys None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Flock Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 58.90 None 4.35 None 46 71 None None None None None
14147 14147 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10742 10742 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 28. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 8 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
14148 14148 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10741 10741 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 14. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 66 72 None None None None None
14149 14149 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10742 10742 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 28. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
14150 14150 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10741 10741 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 14. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 23 None 13 None None None None None 66 72 None None None None None
14151 14151 10008 None 10404 10.1136/vr.101759 Jones2013 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli found in GB turkey flocks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10024 10024 Foot dip replenishment In breeding turkeys Replenished more than once a week Not replenished more than once a week Turkey Breeding Turkeys None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Flock Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 6.70 None 41.10 None 60 56 None None None None None
14152 14152 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10742 10742 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 28. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 13 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
14153 14153 10008 None 10404 10.1136/vr.101759 Jones2013 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli found in GB turkey flocks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10023 10023 Fluoroquinolone use Fluoroquinolone treatments used within last year; In breeding turkeys Fluoroquinolone use No use Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Flock Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 50.00 None 19.80 None 21 80 None None None None None
14154 14154 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10741 10741 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 14. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 44 None 50 None None None None None 66 72 None None None None None
14155 14155 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10742 10742 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 28. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 37 None 34 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
14156 14156 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10741 10741 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 14. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False 42 None 48 None None None None None 66 72 None None None None None
14157 14157 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10742 10742 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 28. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False 34 None 31 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
14158 14158 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10741 10741 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 14. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 17 None 27 None None None None None 66 72 None None None None None
14159 14159 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10742 10742 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 28. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 10 None 16 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
14160 14160 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10741 10741 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 14. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 43 None 53 None None None None None 66 72 None None None None None
14161 14161 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10742 10742 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 28. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 36 None 34 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
14162 14162 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10741 10741 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 14. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 12 None 10 None None None None None 66 72 None None None None None
14163 14163 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10742 10742 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 28. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 6 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
14164 14164 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10741 10741 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 14. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 66 72 None None None None None
14165 14165 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10742 10742 Housing Type Group 1 (housed in isolated hutches outside of the calf ranch which had never before housed calves) vs Group 2 (housed within the calf ranch). Neither group received antimicrobial therapy or medicated milk replacer. Data is from Day 28. Group 1 (isolated housing) Group 2 (housed within calf ranch) Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
14166 14166 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10735 10735 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belongd to Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available, only un-medicated milk replacer administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 34 None 31 None None None None None 54 103 None None None None None
14167 14167 10008 None 10404 10.1136/vr.101759 Jones2013 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli found in GB turkey flocks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10027 10027 Neighbouring farms with horses In breeding turkeys Neighbouring farms with horses No neighbouring farms with horses Turkey Breeding Turkeys None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Flock Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 46.20 None 11.10 None 39 72 None None None None None
14168 14168 10008 None 10404 10.1136/vr.101759 Jones2013 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli found in GB turkey flocks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10026 10026 Independent farm In fattening turkeys Independent farm Not independent farm Turkey Fattening Turkeys None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Flock Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 17.10 None 28.80 None 176 59 None None None None None
14169 14169 10008 None 10404 10.1136/vr.101759 Jones2013 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli found in GB turkey flocks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10031 10031 Staff work with other livestock In fattening turkeys Yes No Turkey Fattening Turkeys None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Flock Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 25.70 None 15.70 None 101 134 None None None None None
14170 14170 10008 None 10404 10.1136/vr.101759 Jones2013 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli found in GB turkey flocks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10028 10028 Neighbouring farms with pigs In fattening turkeys Yes No Turkey Fattening Turkeys None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Flock Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 17.90 None 25.90 None 196 27 None None None None None
14171 14171 10008 None 10404 10.1136/vr.101759 Jones2013 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli found in GB turkey flocks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10033 10033 Watercourse runs close to poultry houses In fattening turkeys Yes No Turkey Fattening Turkeys None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Flock Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 7.50 None 22.30 None 40 193 None None None None None
14172 14172 10008 None 10404 10.1136/vr.101759 Jones2013 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli found in GB turkey flocks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10022 10022 Flocks divided by partitions In fattening turkeys Yes No Turkey Fattening Turkeys None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Flock Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 12.50 None 23.30 None 64 159 None None None None None
14173 14173 10008 None 10404 10.1136/vr.101759 Jones2013 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli found in GB turkey flocks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10018 10018 Dedicated gloves provided for farm staff In fattening turkeys Yes No Turkey Fattening Turkeys None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Flock Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 17.10 None 22.90 None 117 118 None None None None None
14174 14174 10008 None 10404 10.1136/vr.101759 Jones2013 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli found in GB turkey flocks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10015 10015 All in, all out Birds reared in same house from day-old to depopulation; in breeding turkeys Yes No Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Flock Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 43.80 None 6.30 None 16 95 None None None None None
14175 14175 10008 None 10404 10.1136/vr.101759 Jones2013 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli found in GB turkey flocks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10025 10025 Independent farm In breeding turkeys Yes No Turkey Breeding Turkeys None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Flock Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 46.40 None 2.40 None 28 83 None None None None None
14176 14176 10008 None 10404 10.1136/vr.101759 Jones2013 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli found in GB turkey flocks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10032 10032 Water used from mains In breeding turkeys Yes No Turkey Breeding Turkeys None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Flock Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 9.30 None 31.60 None 97 19 None None None None None
14177 14177 10008 None 10404 10.1136/vr.101759 Jones2013 Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli found in GB turkey flocks United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10030 10030 Other domestic animals on farm In breeding turkeys Yes No Turkey Breeding Turkeys None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Flock Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 14.30 None 10.80 None 28 83 None None None None None
14178 14178 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10735 10735 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belongd to Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available, only un-medicated milk replacer administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 34 None 54 None None None None None 54 103 None None None None None
14179 14179 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10735 10735 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belongd to Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available, only un-medicated milk replacer administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False 34 None 31 None None None None None 54 103 None None None None None
14180 14180 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10735 10735 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belongd to Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available, only un-medicated milk replacer administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 34 None 31 None None None None None 54 103 None None None None None
14181 14181 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10735 10735 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belongd to Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available, only un-medicated milk replacer administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 3 None None None None None 54 103 None None None None None
14182 14182 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10735 10735 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belongd to Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available, only un-medicated milk replacer administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 22 None 24 None None None None None 54 103 None None None None None
14183 14183 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10735 10735 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belongd to Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available, only un-medicated milk replacer administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 35 None 64 None None None None None 54 103 None None None None None
14184 14184 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10735 10735 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belongd to Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available, only un-medicated milk replacer administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False 35 None 57 None None None None None 54 103 None None None None None
14185 14185 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10735 10735 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belongd to Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available, only un-medicated milk replacer administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 25 None 28 None None None None None 54 103 None None None None None
14186 14186 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10735 10735 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belongd to Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available, only un-medicated milk replacer administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 47 None 84 None None None None None 54 103 None None None None None
14187 14187 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10735 10735 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belongd to Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available, only un-medicated milk replacer administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 23 None 22 None None None None None 54 103 None None None None None
14188 14188 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10735 10735 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belongd to Group 3 (antimicrobial therapy available, only un-medicated milk replacer administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 54 103 None None None None None
14189 14189 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10736 10736 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belonged to Group 4 (AM therapy available, milk replacer with tetracycline HCl and neomycin sulfate administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 14 None 139 None None None None None 15 156 None None None None None
14190 14190 10071 None 11892 10.1093/aje/kwx286 Moser2018 The Role of Mobile Genetic Elements in the Spread of Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli From Chickens to Humans in Small-Scale Production Poultry Operations in Rural Ecuador Ecuador Observational 10199 10199 Village production type None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None False None False None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
14191 14191 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10736 10736 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belonged to Group 4 (AM therapy available, milk replacer with tetracycline HCl and neomycin sulfate administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 153 None None None None None 15 156 None None None None None
14192 14192 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10736 10736 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belonged to Group 4 (AM therapy available, milk replacer with tetracycline HCl and neomycin sulfate administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False 14 None 139 None None None None None 15 156 None None None None None
14193 14193 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10736 10736 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belonged to Group 4 (AM therapy available, milk replacer with tetracycline HCl and neomycin sulfate administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 14 None 139 None None None None None 15 156 None None None None None
14194 14194 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10736 10736 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belonged to Group 4 (AM therapy available, milk replacer with tetracycline HCl and neomycin sulfate administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 94 None None None None None 15 156 None None None None None
14195 14195 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10736 10736 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belonged to Group 4 (AM therapy available, milk replacer with tetracycline HCl and neomycin sulfate administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 128 None None None None None 15 156 None None None None None
14196 14196 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10736 10736 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belonged to Group 4 (AM therapy available, milk replacer with tetracycline HCl and neomycin sulfate administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 156 None None None None None 15 156 None None None None None
14197 14197 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10736 10736 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belonged to Group 4 (AM therapy available, milk replacer with tetracycline HCl and neomycin sulfate administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 156 None None None None None 15 156 None None None None None
14198 14198 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10736 10736 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belonged to Group 4 (AM therapy available, milk replacer with tetracycline HCl and neomycin sulfate administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 147 None None None None None 15 156 None None None None None
14199 14199 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10736 10736 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belonged to Group 4 (AM therapy available, milk replacer with tetracycline HCl and neomycin sulfate administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 156 None None None None None 15 156 None None None None None
14200 14200 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10736 10736 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belonged to Group 4 (AM therapy available, milk replacer with tetracycline HCl and neomycin sulfate administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 139 None None None None None 15 156 None None None None None
14201 14201 10249 None 7823 10.1128/AEM.02239-05 Berge_2006_AppandEnvMic Field trial evaluating the influence of prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial administration on antimicrobial resistance of fecal Escherichia coli in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10736 10736 Antimicrobial Treatment Compares calves treated with ceftiofur within 5 days of sampling with untreated calves. All calves belonged to Group 4 (AM therapy available, milk replacer with tetracycline HCl and neomycin sulfate administered). Data are from Day-14 and Day-28 samples. Ceftiofur Treatment No Treatment Cattle Pre-weaned Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 8 None None None None None 15 156 None None None None None
14202 14202 10313 None 11768 10.4315/0362-028X-70.4.1021 Miranda_2007_JoofFoPr Antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus spp. strains isolated from organic chicken, conventional chicken, and turkey meat: A comparative survey Spain Observational 10931 10931 Production Type 30 each of organically reared vs conventionally reared chicken meat drumstick samples were compared. Two enterococci strains were isolated from each sample. Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 18.33 None 33.33 None 60 60 None None None None None
14203 14203 10313 None 11768 10.4315/0362-028X-70.4.1021 Miranda_2007_JoofFoPr Antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus spp. strains isolated from organic chicken, conventional chicken, and turkey meat: A comparative survey Spain Observational 10931 10931 Production Type 30 each of organically reared vs conventionally reared chicken meat drumstick samples were compared. Two enterococci strains were isolated from each sample. Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 3.34 None 20.00 None 60 60 None None None None None
14204 14204 10313 None 11768 10.4315/0362-028X-70.4.1021 Miranda_2007_JoofFoPr Antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus spp. strains isolated from organic chicken, conventional chicken, and turkey meat: A comparative survey Spain Observational 10931 10931 Production Type 30 each of organically reared vs conventionally reared chicken meat drumstick samples were compared. Two enterococci strains were isolated from each sample. Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines doxycycline None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 15.00 None 31.66 None 60 60 None None None None None
14205 14205 10313 None 11768 10.4315/0362-028X-70.4.1021 Miranda_2007_JoofFoPr Antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus spp. strains isolated from organic chicken, conventional chicken, and turkey meat: A comparative survey Spain Observational 10931 10931 Production Type 30 each of organically reared vs conventionally reared chicken meat drumstick samples were compared. Two enterococci strains were isolated from each sample. Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 45.00 None 41.66 None 60 60 None None None None None
14206 14206 10313 None 11768 10.4315/0362-028X-70.4.1021 Miranda_2007_JoofFoPr Antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus spp. strains isolated from organic chicken, conventional chicken, and turkey meat: A comparative survey Spain Observational 10931 10931 Production Type 30 each of organically reared vs conventionally reared chicken meat drumstick samples were compared. Two enterococci strains were isolated from each sample. Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 68.34 None 55.00 None 60 60 None None None None None
14207 14207 10313 None 11768 10.4315/0362-028X-70.4.1021 Miranda_2007_JoofFoPr Antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus spp. strains isolated from organic chicken, conventional chicken, and turkey meat: A comparative survey Spain Observational 10931 10931 Production Type 30 each of organically reared vs conventionally reared chicken meat drumstick samples were compared. Two enterococci strains were isolated from each sample. Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 25.00 None 30.00 None 60 60 None None None None None
14208 14208 10313 None 11768 10.4315/0362-028X-70.4.1021 Miranda_2007_JoofFoPr Antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus spp. strains isolated from organic chicken, conventional chicken, and turkey meat: A comparative survey Spain Observational 10931 10931 Production Type 30 each of organically reared vs conventionally reared chicken meat drumstick samples were compared. Two enterococci strains were isolated from each sample. Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 5.00 None 16.67 None 60 60 None None None None None
14209 14209 10313 None 11768 10.4315/0362-028X-70.4.1021 Miranda_2007_JoofFoPr Antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus spp. strains isolated from organic chicken, conventional chicken, and turkey meat: A comparative survey Spain Observational 10931 10931 Production Type 30 each of organically reared vs conventionally reared chicken meat drumstick samples were compared. Two enterococci strains were isolated from each sample. Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 3.33 None 15.00 None 60 60 None None None None None
14210 14210 10266 None 8367 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.03.004 Chauvin_2005_PrevVeteMedi Use of avilamycin for growth promotion and avilamycin-resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers in a matched case-control study in France France Other 10803 10803 Antimicrobial Use Previous avilamycin consumption was first tested as a putative explanatory variable in a univariable model for inclusion in the case-control model. Broilers were matched according to the slaughterhouse, slaughter month, and production type. Antimicrobial Use No Use Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio Carcass Antibiotics avilamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None None None None None None 2.30 1.20 4.30 <0.05 None
14211 14211 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10797 10797 Diet Supplementation Group 2 (diet supplemented with ionophore-coccidiostatics (monensin) at 90g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented diet). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina, respectively. Group 2 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14212 14212 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10797 10797 Diet Supplementation Group 2 (diet supplemented with ionophore-coccidiostatics (monensin) at 90g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented diet). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina, respectively. Group 2 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins phenoxymethylpenicillin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 40.00 None 67.70 None 30 30 None None None None None
14213 14213 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10797 10797 Diet Supplementation Group 2 (diet supplemented with ionophore-coccidiostatics (monensin) at 90g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented diet). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina, respectively. Group 2 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 10.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14214 14214 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10797 10797 Diet Supplementation Group 2 (diet supplemented with ionophore-coccidiostatics (monensin) at 90g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented diet). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina, respectively. Group 2 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 6.60 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14215 14215 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10797 10797 Diet Supplementation Group 2 (diet supplemented with ionophore-coccidiostatics (monensin) at 90g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented diet). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina, respectively. Group 2 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 3.30 None 3.30 None 30 30 None None None None None
14216 14216 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10797 10797 Diet Supplementation Group 2 (diet supplemented with ionophore-coccidiostatics (monensin) at 90g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented diet). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina, respectively. Group 2 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics rifampicin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 33.30 None 23.30 None 30 30 None None None None None
14217 14217 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10797 10797 Diet Supplementation Group 2 (diet supplemented with ionophore-coccidiostatics (monensin) at 90g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented diet). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina, respectively. Group 2 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14218 14218 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10797 10797 Diet Supplementation Group 2 (diet supplemented with ionophore-coccidiostatics (monensin) at 90g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented diet). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina, respectively. Group 2 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14219 14219 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10796 10796 Diet Supplementation Group 2 (diet supplemented with ionophore-coccidiostatics (monensin) at 90g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented diet). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina, respectively. Group 2 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 100.00 None 56.70 None 30 30 None None None None None
14220 14220 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10796 10796 Diet Supplementation Group 2 (diet supplemented with ionophore-coccidiostatics (monensin) at 90g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented diet). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina, respectively. Group 2 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken None None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus None False None False None None None None 6.60 None 50.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14221 14221 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10798 10798 Diet Supplementation Group 3 (diet supplemented with probiotic E. faecium 3.5x10^10 UFC/g at 35g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented diet). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina, respectively. Group 3 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14222 14222 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10798 10798 Diet Supplementation Group 3 (diet supplemented with probiotic E. faecium 3.5x10^10 UFC/g at 35g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented diet). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina, respectively. Group 3 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins phenoxymethylpenicillin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 56.70 None 67.70 None 30 30 None None None None None
14223 14223 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10798 10798 Diet Supplementation Group 3 (diet supplemented with probiotic E. faecium 3.5x10^10 UFC/g at 35g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented diet). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina, respectively. Group 3 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 3.30 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14224 14224 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10798 10798 Diet Supplementation Group 3 (diet supplemented with probiotic E. faecium 3.5x10^10 UFC/g at 35g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented diet). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina, respectively. Group 3 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 16.60 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14225 14225 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10798 10798 Diet Supplementation Group 3 (diet supplemented with probiotic E. faecium 3.5x10^10 UFC/g at 35g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented diet). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina, respectively. Group 3 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 16.60 None 3.30 None 30 30 None None None None None
14226 14226 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10798 10798 Diet Supplementation Group 3 (diet supplemented with probiotic E. faecium 3.5x10^10 UFC/g at 35g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented diet). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina, respectively. Group 3 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics rifampicin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 60.00 None 23.30 None 30 30 None None None None None
14227 14227 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10798 10798 Diet Supplementation Group 3 (diet supplemented with probiotic E. faecium 3.5x10^10 UFC/g at 35g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented diet). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina, respectively. Group 3 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14228 14228 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10798 10798 Diet Supplementation Group 3 (diet supplemented with probiotic E. faecium 3.5x10^10 UFC/g at 35g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented diet). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina, respectively. Group 3 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14229 14229 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10798 10798 Diet Supplementation Group 3 (diet supplemented with probiotic E. faecium 3.5x10^10 UFC/g at 35g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented diet). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina, respectively. Group 3 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 100.00 None 56.70 None 30 30 None None None None None
14230 14230 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10798 10798 Diet Supplementation Group 3 (diet supplemented with probiotic E. faecium 3.5x10^10 UFC/g at 35g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented diet). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina, respectively. Group 3 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 53.30 None 50.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14231 14231 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10799 10799 Diet Supplementation Group 4 (diet supplemented with both monensin and probiotic--see previous factors for detailed dose info) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 4 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14232 14232 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10799 10799 Diet Supplementation Group 4 (diet supplemented with both monensin and probiotic--see previous factors for detailed dose info) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 4 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins phenoxymethylpenicillin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 60.00 None 67.70 None 30 30 None None None None None
14233 14233 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10799 10799 Diet Supplementation Group 4 (diet supplemented with both monensin and probiotic--see previous factors for detailed dose info) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 4 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 6.60 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14234 14234 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10799 10799 Diet Supplementation Group 4 (diet supplemented with both monensin and probiotic--see previous factors for detailed dose info) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 4 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 3.30 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14235 14235 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10799 10799 Diet Supplementation Group 4 (diet supplemented with both monensin and probiotic--see previous factors for detailed dose info) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 4 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 46.70 None 3.30 None 30 30 None None None None None
14236 14236 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10799 10799 Diet Supplementation Group 4 (diet supplemented with both monensin and probiotic--see previous factors for detailed dose info) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 4 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics rifampicin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 26.70 None 23.30 None 30 30 None None None None None
14237 14237 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10799 10799 Diet Supplementation Group 4 (diet supplemented with both monensin and probiotic--see previous factors for detailed dose info) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 4 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 13.30 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14238 14238 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10799 10799 Diet Supplementation Group 4 (diet supplemented with both monensin and probiotic--see previous factors for detailed dose info) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 4 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14239 14239 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10799 10799 Diet Supplementation Group 4 (diet supplemented with both monensin and probiotic--see previous factors for detailed dose info) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 4 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 90.00 None 56.70 None 30 30 None None None None None
14240 14240 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10799 10799 Diet Supplementation Group 4 (diet supplemented with both monensin and probiotic--see previous factors for detailed dose info) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 4 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 70.00 None 50.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14241 14241 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10800 10800 Diet Supplementation Group 5 (diet supplemented with essential oil (extracted of thyme and clove) at 100g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 5 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14242 14242 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10800 10800 Diet Supplementation Group 5 (diet supplemented with essential oil (extracted of thyme and clove) at 100g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 5 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins phenoxymethylpenicillin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 33.30 None 67.70 None 30 30 None None None None None
14243 14243 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10800 10800 Diet Supplementation Group 5 (diet supplemented with essential oil (extracted of thyme and clove) at 100g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 5 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 3.30 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14244 14244 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10800 10800 Diet Supplementation Group 5 (diet supplemented with essential oil (extracted of thyme and clove) at 100g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 5 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14245 14245 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10800 10800 Diet Supplementation Group 5 (diet supplemented with essential oil (extracted of thyme and clove) at 100g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 5 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 43.30 None 3.30 None 30 30 None None None None None
14246 14246 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10800 10800 Diet Supplementation Group 5 (diet supplemented with essential oil (extracted of thyme and clove) at 100g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 5 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics rifampicin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 20.00 None 23.30 None 30 30 None None None None None
14247 14247 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10800 10800 Diet Supplementation Group 5 (diet supplemented with essential oil (extracted of thyme and clove) at 100g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 5 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14248 14248 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10800 10800 Diet Supplementation Group 5 (diet supplemented with essential oil (extracted of thyme and clove) at 100g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 5 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 6.60 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14249 14249 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10800 10800 Diet Supplementation Group 5 (diet supplemented with essential oil (extracted of thyme and clove) at 100g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 5 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 100.00 None 56.70 None 30 30 None None None None None
14250 14250 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10800 10800 Diet Supplementation Group 5 (diet supplemented with essential oil (extracted of thyme and clove) at 100g/ton) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 5 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 53.30 None 50.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14251 14251 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10801 10801 Diet Supplementation Group 6 (diet supplemented with both monensin and essential oil--see previous factors for dose info) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 6 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14252 14252 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10801 10801 Diet Supplementation Group 6 (diet supplemented with both monensin and essential oil--see previous factors for dose info) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 6 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins phenoxymethylpenicillin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 33.30 None 67.70 None 30 30 None None None None None
14253 14253 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10801 10801 Diet Supplementation Group 6 (diet supplemented with both monensin and essential oil--see previous factors for dose info) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 6 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14254 14254 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10801 10801 Diet Supplementation Group 6 (diet supplemented with both monensin and essential oil--see previous factors for dose info) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 6 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 6.60 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14255 14255 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10801 10801 Diet Supplementation Group 6 (diet supplemented with both monensin and essential oil--see previous factors for dose info) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 6 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 13.30 None 3.30 None 30 30 None None None None None
14256 14256 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10801 10801 Diet Supplementation Group 6 (diet supplemented with both monensin and essential oil--see previous factors for dose info) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 6 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics rifampicin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 20.00 None 23.30 None 30 30 None None None None None
14257 14257 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10801 10801 Diet Supplementation Group 6 (diet supplemented with both monensin and essential oil--see previous factors for dose info) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 6 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 6.60 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14258 14258 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10801 10801 Diet Supplementation Group 6 (diet supplemented with both monensin and essential oil--see previous factors for dose info) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 6 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 3.30 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14259 14259 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10801 10801 Diet Supplementation Group 6 (diet supplemented with both monensin and essential oil--see previous factors for dose info) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 6 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 87.00 None 56.70 None 30 30 None None None None None
14260 14260 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10801 10801 Diet Supplementation Group 6 (diet supplemented with both monensin and essential oil--see previous factors for dose info) vs Group 1 (un-supplemented). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Group 6 (supplement) Group 1 (no supplement) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 26.70 None 50.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14261 14261 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10795 10795 Bacitracin Use Group 7 (in-feed bacitracin methylene disalicylate 11% at 200g/ton) vs Group 1 (regular feed). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Bacitracin Use (Group 7) No Use (Group 1) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14262 14262 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10795 10795 Bacitracin Use Group 7 (in-feed bacitracin methylene disalicylate 11% at 200g/ton) vs Group 1 (regular feed). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Bacitracin Use (Group 7) No Use (Group 1) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins phenoxymethylpenicillin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 50.00 None 67.70 None 30 30 None None None None None
14263 14263 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10795 10795 Bacitracin Use Group 7 (in-feed bacitracin methylene disalicylate 11% at 200g/ton) vs Group 1 (regular feed). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Bacitracin Use (Group 7) No Use (Group 1) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 6.60 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14264 14264 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10795 10795 Bacitracin Use Group 7 (in-feed bacitracin methylene disalicylate 11% at 200g/ton) vs Group 1 (regular feed). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Bacitracin Use (Group 7) No Use (Group 1) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14265 14265 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10795 10795 Bacitracin Use Group 7 (in-feed bacitracin methylene disalicylate 11% at 200g/ton) vs Group 1 (regular feed). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Bacitracin Use (Group 7) No Use (Group 1) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 23.30 None 3.30 None 30 30 None None None None None
14266 14266 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10795 10795 Bacitracin Use Group 7 (in-feed bacitracin methylene disalicylate 11% at 200g/ton) vs Group 1 (regular feed). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Bacitracin Use (Group 7) No Use (Group 1) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics rifampicin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 63.30 None 23.30 None 30 30 None None None None None
14267 14267 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10795 10795 Bacitracin Use Group 7 (in-feed bacitracin methylene disalicylate 11% at 200g/ton) vs Group 1 (regular feed). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Bacitracin Use (Group 7) No Use (Group 1) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 3.30 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14268 14268 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10795 10795 Bacitracin Use Group 7 (in-feed bacitracin methylene disalicylate 11% at 200g/ton) vs Group 1 (regular feed). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Bacitracin Use (Group 7) No Use (Group 1) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14269 14269 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10795 10795 Bacitracin Use Group 7 (in-feed bacitracin methylene disalicylate 11% at 200g/ton) vs Group 1 (regular feed). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Bacitracin Use (Group 7) No Use (Group 1) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 93.00 None 56.70 None 30 30 None None None None None
14270 14270 10262 None 8259 10.1590/S1517-83822011000200012 Cassenego_2011_BrJoofMi Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from broilers infected experimentally with Eimeria spp and fed with diets containing different supplements Brazil Experimental 10795 10795 Bacitracin Use Group 7 (in-feed bacitracin methylene disalicylate 11% at 200g/ton) vs Group 1 (regular feed). Both groups were inoculated at 14 days old with 5x10^4 and 1x10^4 oocysts/chicken of Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Bacitracin Use (Group 7) No Use (Group 1) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False None None None None 53.30 None 50.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
14272 14272 10241 None 7428 10.1128/AEM.00364-11 Amachawadi_2011_AppandEnvMic Selection of fecal enterococci exhibiting tcrB-mediated copper resistance in pigs fed diets supplemented with copper United States of America Experimental 10715 10715 Diet Supplementation Control group: 16.5 ppm in-feed copper, Treatment group: 125 ppm in-feed copper sulfate. AMR data is reported as the # of isolates positive for the tcrB gene (determined from PCR). Data are representative of sampling day 42. Elevated In-Feed Copper Basal In-Feed Copper Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Antidotes copper sulfate None Enterococcus spp. False None False 11 None 1 None None None None None 45 45 None None None None None
14273 14273 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10245 10245 Production type Conventional Vs Kosher Kosher Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 8 None None None None None 21 33 None None None None None
14274 14274 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10245 10245 Production type Conventional Vs Kosher Kosher Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Penicillins ampicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 6 None None None None None 21 33 None None None None None
14275 14275 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10245 10245 Production type Conventional Vs Kosher Kosher Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 10 None None None None None 21 33 None None None None None
14276 14276 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10245 10245 Production type Conventional Vs Kosher Kosher Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 7 None 1 None None None None None 21 33 None None None None None
14277 14277 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10245 10245 Production type Conventional Vs Kosher Kosher Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 7 None 1 None None None None None 21 33 None None None None None
14278 14278 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10245 10245 Production type Conventional Vs Kosher Kosher Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 21 33 None None None None None
14279 14279 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10245 10245 Production type Conventional Vs Kosher Kosher Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 21 33 None None None None None
14280 14280 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10245 10245 Production type Conventional Vs Kosher Kosher Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 8 None None None None None 21 33 None None None None None
14283 14283 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10713 10713 Diet Supplementation Control diet: 16.5 ppm copper, 165 ppm zinc. Elevated copper diet: 125 ppm copper through copper sulfate. AMR+ isolates are those that were positive for the tcrB gene (PCR). Data represents sampling week 5. Elevated Copper Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Antidotes copper sulfate None Enterococcus spp. False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 5 15 None None None None None
14284 14284 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10714 10714 Diet Supplementation Control diet: 16.5 ppm copper, 165 ppm zinc. Elevated zinc diet: 3000 ppm zinc provided by zinc oxide (reduced to 2000 ppm after 14 days). AMR+ isolates are those that were positive for the tcrB gene (PCR). Data represent sampling week 5. Elevated Zinc Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Antidotes copper sulfate None Enterococcus spp. False None False 2 None 1 None None None None None 14 15 None None None None None
14285 14285 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10712 10712 Diet Supplementation Control diet: 16.5 ppm copper, 165 ppm zinc. Copper and zinc diet: 125 ppm copper and 3000 ppm zinc (2000 ppm after 14 days). AMR+ isolates are those that were positive for the tcrB gene (PCR). Data represent sampling week 5. Elevated Copper and Zinc Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Antidotes copper sulfate None Enterococcus spp. False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 5 15 None None None None None
14286 14286 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10711 10711 Antimicrobial Use Control diet: 16.5 ppm copper, 165 ppm zinc. Neomycin sulfate and oxytetracycline diet: Neo/Oxy 10/10 at 55 mg/kg of feed (1:1). AMR+ isolates are those that were positive for the tcrB gene (PCR). Data represent sampling week 5. Neomycin sulfate and Oxytetracycline Use Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Antidotes copper sulfate None Enterococcus spp. False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 13 15 None None None None None
14287 14287 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10710 10710 Antimicrobial Use Control diet vs Neomycin sulfate and oxytetracycline diet. AST method was micro-broth dilution, performed on all 15 tcrB positive isolates and 15 tcrB negative isolates from the control group. Data are totals across all 5 sampling weeks. Neomycin sulfate and Oxytetracycline Use Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus spp. False None False 2 None 16 None None None None None 2 16 None None None None None
14288 14288 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10710 10710 Antimicrobial Use Control diet vs Neomycin sulfate and oxytetracycline diet. AST method was micro-broth dilution, performed on all 15 tcrB positive isolates and 15 tcrB negative isolates from the control group. Data are totals across all 5 sampling weeks. Neomycin sulfate and Oxytetracycline Use Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines chlortetracycline None Enterococcus spp. False None False 2 None 16 None None None None None 2 16 None None None None None
14289 14289 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10710 10710 Antimicrobial Use Control diet vs Neomycin sulfate and oxytetracycline diet. AST method was micro-broth dilution, performed on all 15 tcrB positive isolates and 15 tcrB negative isolates from the control group. Data are totals across all 5 sampling weeks. Neomycin sulfate and Oxytetracycline Use Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False 2 None 16 None None None None None 2 16 None None None None None
14290 14290 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10710 10710 Antimicrobial Use Control diet vs Neomycin sulfate and oxytetracycline diet. AST method was micro-broth dilution, performed on all 15 tcrB positive isolates and 15 tcrB negative isolates from the control group. Data are totals across all 5 sampling weeks. Neomycin sulfate and Oxytetracycline Use Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Enterococcus spp. False None False 2 None 16 None None None None None 2 16 None None None None None
14291 14291 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10710 10710 Antimicrobial Use Control diet vs Neomycin sulfate and oxytetracycline diet. AST method was micro-broth dilution, performed on all 15 tcrB positive isolates and 15 tcrB negative isolates from the control group. Data are totals across all 5 sampling weeks. Neomycin sulfate and Oxytetracycline Use Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 2 16 None None None None None
14292 14292 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10707 10707 Antimicrobial Use Control diet vs Elevated copper and zinc diet. AST method was micro-broth dilution, performed on all 15 tcrB positive isolates and 15 tcrB negative isolates from the control group. Data are totals across all 5 sampling weeks. Elevated Copper and Zinc Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus spp. False None False 5 None 16 None None None None None 5 16 None None None None None
14293 14293 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10707 10707 Antimicrobial Use Control diet vs Elevated copper and zinc diet. AST method was micro-broth dilution, performed on all 15 tcrB positive isolates and 15 tcrB negative isolates from the control group. Data are totals across all 5 sampling weeks. Elevated Copper and Zinc Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines chlortetracycline None Enterococcus spp. False None False 5 None 16 None None None None None 5 16 None None None None None
14294 14294 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10707 10707 Antimicrobial Use Control diet vs Elevated copper and zinc diet. AST method was micro-broth dilution, performed on all 15 tcrB positive isolates and 15 tcrB negative isolates from the control group. Data are totals across all 5 sampling weeks. Elevated Copper and Zinc Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False 5 None 16 None None None None None 5 16 None None None None None
14295 14295 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10707 10707 Antimicrobial Use Control diet vs Elevated copper and zinc diet. AST method was micro-broth dilution, performed on all 15 tcrB positive isolates and 15 tcrB negative isolates from the control group. Data are totals across all 5 sampling weeks. Elevated Copper and Zinc Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Enterococcus spp. False None False 5 None 16 None None None None None 5 16 None None None None None
14296 14296 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10707 10707 Antimicrobial Use Control diet vs Elevated copper and zinc diet. AST method was micro-broth dilution, performed on all 15 tcrB positive isolates and 15 tcrB negative isolates from the control group. Data are totals across all 5 sampling weeks. Elevated Copper and Zinc Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 5 16 None None None None None
14297 14297 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10709 10709 Antimicrobial Use Control diet vs Elevated zinc diet. AST method was micro-broth dilution, performed on all 15 tcrB positive isolates and 15 tcrB negative isolates from the control group. Data are totals across all 5 sampling weeks. Elevated Zinc Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus spp. False None False 5 None 16 None None None None None 5 16 None None None None None
14298 14298 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10709 10709 Antimicrobial Use Control diet vs Elevated zinc diet. AST method was micro-broth dilution, performed on all 15 tcrB positive isolates and 15 tcrB negative isolates from the control group. Data are totals across all 5 sampling weeks. Elevated Zinc Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines chlortetracycline None Enterococcus spp. False None False 5 None 16 None None None None None 5 16 None None None None None
14299 14299 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10709 10709 Antimicrobial Use Control diet vs Elevated zinc diet. AST method was micro-broth dilution, performed on all 15 tcrB positive isolates and 15 tcrB negative isolates from the control group. Data are totals across all 5 sampling weeks. Elevated Zinc Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False 5 None 16 None None None None None 5 16 None None None None None
14300 14300 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10709 10709 Antimicrobial Use Control diet vs Elevated zinc diet. AST method was micro-broth dilution, performed on all 15 tcrB positive isolates and 15 tcrB negative isolates from the control group. Data are totals across all 5 sampling weeks. Elevated Zinc Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Enterococcus spp. False None False 5 None 16 None None None None None 5 16 None None None None None
14301 14301 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10709 10709 Antimicrobial Use Control diet vs Elevated zinc diet. AST method was micro-broth dilution, performed on all 15 tcrB positive isolates and 15 tcrB negative isolates from the control group. Data are totals across all 5 sampling weeks. Elevated Zinc Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 5 16 None None None None None
14302 14302 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10708 10708 Antimicrobial Use Control diet vs Elevated copper diet. AST method was micro-broth dilution, performed on all 15 tcrB positive isolates and 15 tcrB negative isolates from the control group. Data are totals across all 5 sampling weeks. Elevated Copper Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus spp. False None False 2 None 16 None None None None None 2 16 None None None None None
14303 14303 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10708 10708 Antimicrobial Use Control diet vs Elevated copper diet. AST method was micro-broth dilution, performed on all 15 tcrB positive isolates and 15 tcrB negative isolates from the control group. Data are totals across all 5 sampling weeks. Elevated Copper Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines chlortetracycline None Enterococcus spp. False None False 2 None 16 None None None None None 2 16 None None None None None
14304 14304 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10708 10708 Antimicrobial Use Control diet vs Elevated copper diet. AST method was micro-broth dilution, performed on all 15 tcrB positive isolates and 15 tcrB negative isolates from the control group. Data are totals across all 5 sampling weeks. Elevated Copper Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False 2 None 16 None None None None None 2 16 None None None None None
14305 14305 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10708 10708 Antimicrobial Use Control diet vs Elevated copper diet. AST method was micro-broth dilution, performed on all 15 tcrB positive isolates and 15 tcrB negative isolates from the control group. Data are totals across all 5 sampling weeks. Elevated Copper Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Enterococcus spp. False None False 2 None 16 None None None None None 2 16 None None None None None
14306 14306 10240 None 7427 10.1089/fpd.2010.0540 Amachawadi_2010_FooPatandDis Occurrence of tcrB, a transferable copper resistance gene, in fecal enterococci of swine United States of America Experimental 10708 10708 Antimicrobial Use Control diet vs Elevated copper diet. AST method was micro-broth dilution, performed on all 15 tcrB positive isolates and 15 tcrB negative isolates from the control group. Data are totals across all 5 sampling weeks. Elevated Copper Control Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 2 16 None None None None None
14307 14307 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10245 10245 Production type Conventional Vs Kosher Kosher Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 21 33 None None None None None
14308 14308 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10245 10245 Production type Conventional Vs Kosher Kosher Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 7 None 10 None None None None None 21 33 None None None None None
14309 14309 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10245 10245 Production type Conventional Vs Kosher Kosher Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 3 None None None None None 21 33 None None None None None
14310 14310 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10245 10245 Production type Conventional Vs Kosher Kosher Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat None None None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 3 None None None None None 21 33 None None None None None
14311 14311 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10246 10246 Production type Conventional Vs organic organic Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 10 None 8 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14312 14312 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10246 10246 Production type Conventional Vs organic organic Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Penicillins ampicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 6 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14313 14313 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10246 10246 Production type Conventional Vs organic organic Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 10 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14314 14314 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10246 10246 Production type Conventional Vs organic organic Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 1 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14315 14315 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10246 10246 Production type Conventional Vs organic organic Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 1 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14316 14316 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10246 10246 Production type Conventional Vs organic organic Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14317 14317 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10246 10246 Production type Conventional Vs organic organic Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14318 14318 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10246 10246 Production type Conventional Vs organic organic Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 8 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14319 14319 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10246 10246 Production type Conventional Vs organic organic Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14320 14320 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10246 10246 Production type Conventional Vs organic organic Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 10 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14321 14321 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10246 10246 Production type Conventional Vs organic organic Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 3 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14322 14322 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10247 10247 Production type Conventional Vs raised without antibiotics (RWA) RWA Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 8 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14323 14323 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10247 10247 Production type Conventional Vs raised without antibiotics (RWA) RWA Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 5 None 8 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14324 14324 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10247 10247 Production type Conventional Vs raised without antibiotics (RWA) RWA Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Penicillins ampicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 6 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14325 14325 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10247 10247 Production type Conventional Vs raised without antibiotics (RWA) RWA Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Escherichia coli False None False 11 None 10 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14326 14326 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10247 10247 Production type Conventional Vs raised without antibiotics (RWA) RWA Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 1 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14327 14327 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10247 10247 Production type Conventional Vs raised without antibiotics (RWA) RWA Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 1 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14328 14328 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10247 10247 Production type Conventional Vs raised without antibiotics (RWA) RWA Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14329 14329 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10247 10247 Production type Conventional Vs raised without antibiotics (RWA) RWA Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 1 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14330 14330 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10247 10247 Production type Conventional Vs raised without antibiotics (RWA) RWA Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 4 None 8 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14331 14331 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10247 10247 Production type Conventional Vs raised without antibiotics (RWA) RWA Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14332 14332 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10247 10247 Production type Conventional Vs raised without antibiotics (RWA) RWA Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 9 None 10 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14333 14333 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10247 10247 Production type Conventional Vs raised without antibiotics (RWA) RWA Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 3 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14335 14335 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10912 10912 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ The Total columns from Tables 2 and 3 were aggregated for extraction (includes breast, ground breast, drumstick, and wing samples). Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Enterococcus spp. False None False 29 None 17 None None None None None 176 89 None None None None None
14336 14336 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10913 10913 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ The Total columns from Tables 2 and 3 were aggregated for extraction. AMR is for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Enterococcus spp. False None False 15 None 13 None None None None None 176 89 None None None None None
14337 14337 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10912 10912 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ The Total columns from Tables 2 and 3 were aggregated for extraction (includes breast, ground breast, drumstick, and wing samples). Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus spp. False None False 14 None 17 None None None None None 176 89 None None None None None
14338 14338 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10912 10912 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ The Total columns from Tables 2 and 3 were aggregated for extraction (includes breast, ground breast, drumstick, and wing samples). Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides azithromycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False 11 None 4 None None None None None 176 89 None None None None None
14339 14339 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10912 10912 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ The Total columns from Tables 2 and 3 were aggregated for extraction (includes breast, ground breast, drumstick, and wing samples). Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefaclor None Enterococcus spp. False None False 18 None 7 None None None None None 176 89 None None None None None
14340 14340 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10912 10912 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ The Total columns from Tables 2 and 3 were aggregated for extraction (includes breast, ground breast, drumstick, and wing samples). Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Enterococcus spp. False None False 16 None 18 None None None None None 176 89 None None None None None
14341 14341 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10912 10912 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ The Total columns from Tables 2 and 3 were aggregated for extraction (includes breast, ground breast, drumstick, and wing samples). Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus spp. False None False 4 None 1 None None None None None 176 89 None None None None None
14342 14342 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10912 10912 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ The Total columns from Tables 2 and 3 were aggregated for extraction (includes breast, ground breast, drumstick, and wing samples). Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False 96 None 67 None None None None None 176 89 None None None None None
14343 14343 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10912 10912 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ The Total columns from Tables 2 and 3 were aggregated for extraction (includes breast, ground breast, drumstick, and wing samples). Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False 52 None 56 None None None None None 176 89 None None None None None
14344 14344 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10912 10912 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ The Total columns from Tables 2 and 3 were aggregated for extraction (includes breast, ground breast, drumstick, and wing samples). Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins phenoxymethylpenicillin None Enterococcus spp. False None False 55 None 53 None None None None None 176 89 None None None None None
14345 14345 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10912 10912 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ The Total columns from Tables 2 and 3 were aggregated for extraction (includes breast, ground breast, drumstick, and wing samples). Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus spp. False None False 131 None 84 None None None None None 176 89 None None None None None
14346 14346 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10912 10912 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ The Total columns from Tables 2 and 3 were aggregated for extraction (includes breast, ground breast, drumstick, and wing samples). Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus spp. False None False 60 None 42 None None None None None 176 89 None None None None None
14347 14347 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10908 10908 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 20 None 59 None None None None None 77 77 None None None None None
14348 14348 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10908 10908 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins phenoxymethylpenicillin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 21 None 61 None None None None None 77 77 None None None None None
14349 14349 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10908 10908 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecium False None False 25 None 66 None None None None None 77 77 None None None None None
14350 14350 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10908 10908 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 18 None 53 None None None None None 77 77 None None None None None
14351 14351 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10908 10908 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 5 None 7 None None None None None 77 77 None None None None None
14352 14352 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10908 10908 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 3 None 10 None None None None None 77 77 None None None None None
14353 14353 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10908 10908 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefaclor None Enterococcus faecium False None False 3 None 8 None None None None None 77 77 None None None None None
14354 14354 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10908 10908 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 77 77 None None None None None
14355 14355 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10908 10908 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides azithromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 6 None 18 None None None None None 77 77 None None None None None
14356 14356 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10911 10911 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ Microbe is Enterococcus gallinarum. Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Other False None False 9 None 30 None None None None None 77 77 None None None None None
14357 14357 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10911 10911 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ Microbe is Enterococcus gallinarum. Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins phenoxymethylpenicillin None Enterococcus Other False None False 7 None 16 None None None None None 77 77 None None None None None
14358 14358 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10911 10911 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ Microbe is Enterococcus gallinarum. Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Enterococcus Other False None False 2 None 7 None None None None None 77 77 None None None None None
14359 14359 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10911 10911 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ Microbe is Enterococcus gallinarum. Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Other False None False 5 None 12 None None None None None 77 77 None None None None None
14360 14360 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10911 10911 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ Microbe is Enterococcus gallinarum. Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Enterococcus Other False None False 2 None 5 None None None None None 77 77 None None None None None
14361 14361 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10909 10909 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ Microbe is Enterococcus casseliflavus. Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Other False None False 0 None 3 None None None None None 77 77 None None None None None
14362 14362 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10909 10909 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ Microbe is Enterococcus casseliflavus. Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Other False None False 1 None 4 None None None None None 77 77 None None None None None
14363 14363 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10909 10909 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ Microbe is Enterococcus casseliflavus. Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus Other False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 77 77 None None None None None
14364 14364 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10909 10909 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ Microbe is Enterococcus casseliflavus. Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins phenoxymethylpenicillin None Enterococcus Other False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 77 77 None None None None None
14365 14365 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10910 10910 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ Microbe is Enterococcus durans. Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Other False None False 1 None 2 None None None None None 77 77 None None None None None
14366 14366 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10910 10910 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ Microbe is Enterococcus durans. Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus Other False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 77 77 None None None None None
14367 14367 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10910 10910 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ Microbe is Enterococcus durans. Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins phenoxymethylpenicillin None Enterococcus Other False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 77 77 None None None None None
14368 14368 10303 None 10710 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 Kilonzo.Nthenge_2015_JoofFoPr Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken United States of America Observational 10910 10910 Production Type All chicken labeled ‘‘antibiotics free’’ or ‘‘no antibiotics’’ or that had organic symbols was termed ‘‘organic.’’ Microbe is Enterococcus durans. Organic Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Other False None False 0 None 3 None None None None None 77 77 None None None None None
14369 14369 10217 None 7150 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.63 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi_1 Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway Denmark Observational 10632 10632 Antimicrobial Use Comparison of Denmark (1997) vs Norway (1995-1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). Denmark Norway Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Antibiotics avilamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 55 4 None None None None None
14370 14370 10217 None 7150 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.63 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi_1 Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway Denmark Observational 10632 10632 Antimicrobial Use Comparison of Denmark (1997) vs Norway (1995-1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). Denmark Norway Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials Avoparcin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 12 None 1 None None None None None 55 4 None None None None None
14371 14371 10217 None 7150 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.63 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi_1 Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway Denmark Observational 10632 10632 Antimicrobial Use Comparison of Denmark (1997) vs Norway (1995-1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). Denmark Norway Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials bacitracin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 19 None 0 None None None None None 55 4 None None None None None
14372 14372 10217 None 7150 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.63 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi_1 Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway Denmark Observational 10632 10632 Antimicrobial Use Comparison of Denmark (1997) vs Norway (1995-1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). Denmark Norway Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Pyranes and hydropyranes monensin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 55 4 None None None None None
14373 14373 10217 None 7150 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.63 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi_1 Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway Denmark Observational 10632 10632 Antimicrobial Use Comparison of Denmark (1997) vs Norway (1995-1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). Denmark Norway Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Pyranes and hydropyranes salinomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 55 4 None None None None None
14374 14374 10217 None 7150 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.63 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi_1 Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway Denmark Observational 10632 10632 Antimicrobial Use Comparison of Denmark (1997) vs Norway (1995-1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). Denmark Norway Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 45 None 0 None None None None None 55 4 None None None None None
14375 14375 10217 None 7150 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.63 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi_1 Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway Denmark Observational 10632 10632 Antimicrobial Use Comparison of Denmark (1997) vs Norway (1995-1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). Denmark Norway Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Streptogramins virginiamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 27 None 0 None None None None None 55 4 None None None None None
14376 14376 10217 None 7150 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.63 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi_1 Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway Denmark Observational 10630 10630 Antimicrobial Use Comparison of Denmark (1997) vs Finland (1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). Denmark Finland Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Antibiotics avilamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 55 43 None None None None None
14377 14377 10217 None 7150 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.63 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi_1 Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway Denmark Observational 10630 10630 Antimicrobial Use Comparison of Denmark (1997) vs Finland (1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). Denmark Finland Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials Avoparcin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 12 None 2 None None None None None 55 43 None None None None None
14378 14378 10217 None 7150 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.63 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi_1 Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway Denmark Observational 10630 10630 Antimicrobial Use Comparison of Denmark (1997) vs Finland (1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). Denmark Finland Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials bacitracin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 19 None 4 None None None None None 55 43 None None None None None
14379 14379 10217 None 7150 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.63 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi_1 Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway Denmark Observational 10630 10630 Antimicrobial Use Comparison of Denmark (1997) vs Finland (1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). Denmark Finland Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Pyranes and hydropyranes monensin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 55 43 None None None None None
14380 14380 10217 None 7150 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.63 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi_1 Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway Denmark Observational 10630 10630 Antimicrobial Use Comparison of Denmark (1997) vs Finland (1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). Denmark Finland Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Pyranes and hydropyranes salinomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 55 43 None None None None None
14381 14381 10217 None 7150 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.63 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi_1 Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway Denmark Observational 10631 10631 Antimicrobial Use Comparison of Denmark (1997) vs Finland (1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). # AMR+ for Finland was shown as 0, but Table 3 also shows 14% AMR+. Denmark Finland Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 45 None 0 None None None None None 55 43 None None None None None
14382 14382 10217 None 7150 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.63 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi_1 Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway Denmark Observational 10630 10630 Antimicrobial Use Comparison of Denmark (1997) vs Finland (1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). Denmark Finland Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Streptogramins virginiamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 27 None 1 None None None None None 55 43 None None None None None
14383 14383 10217 None 7150 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.63 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi_1 Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway Denmark Observational 10634 10634 Antimicrobial Use Comparison of Finland (1996) vs Norway (1995-1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). Finland Norway Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Antibiotics avilamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 43 4 None None None None None
14384 14384 10217 None 7150 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.63 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi_1 Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway Denmark Observational 10634 10634 Antimicrobial Use Comparison of Finland (1996) vs Norway (1995-1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). Finland Norway Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials Avoparcin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 2 None 1 None None None None None 43 4 None None None None None
14385 14385 10217 None 7150 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.63 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi_1 Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway Denmark Observational 10634 10634 Antimicrobial Use Comparison of Finland (1996) vs Norway (1995-1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). Finland Norway Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other antibacterials bacitracin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 4 None 0 None None None None None 43 4 None None None None None
14386 14386 10217 None 7150 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.63 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi_1 Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway Denmark Observational 10634 10634 Antimicrobial Use Comparison of Finland (1996) vs Norway (1995-1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). Finland Norway Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Pyranes and hydropyranes monensin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 43 4 None None None None None
14387 14387 10217 None 7150 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.63 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi_1 Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway Denmark Observational 10634 10634 Antimicrobial Use Comparison of Finland (1996) vs Norway (1995-1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). Finland Norway Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Pyranes and hydropyranes salinomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 43 4 None None None None None
14388 14388 10217 None 7150 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.63 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi_1 Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway Denmark Observational 10633 10633 Antimicrobial Use Comparison of Finland (1996) vs Norway (1995-1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Pig stage of life unknown. # AMR+ for Finland is reported as 0, but Table 3 also reports 14% AMR+. Finland Norway Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 43 4 None None None None None
14389 14389 10217 None 7150 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.63 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi_1 Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway Denmark Observational 10634 10634 Antimicrobial Use Comparison of Finland (1996) vs Norway (1995-1996). Please see Table 1 for specific AMU information by country from 1989-1997. Sampling was conducted at pig farms (stage of life unknown). Finland Norway Swine None None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Streptogramins virginiamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 43 4 None None None None None
14391 14391 10216 None 7145 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.71 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi Association between the use of avilamycin for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers: Epidemiological study and changes over time Canada Other 10629 10629 Previous Avilamycin Use Exposed group = 10 farms which did not use avilamycin in either 1996 or 1997. Referent group = 8 farms which did use avilamycin in 1997. Please see Tables 1 and 2 for more specific AMU consumption info (from 1990-1998). Sampling performed in 1998. Previous Avilamycin Use No Previous Avilamycin Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Antibiotics avilamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False 64 None 31 None None None None None 88 104 None None None None None
14392 14392 10216 None 7145 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.71 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi Association between the use of avilamycin for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers: Epidemiological study and changes over time Canada Other 10627 10627 Avilamycin Consumption A decrease in consumption of avilamycin occurred in the second half of 1996 (see Tables 1 and 2 for more specific AMU info (from 1990-1998)). So, exposed group = first half 1996, referent group = second half 1998. More Avilamycin Consumption (1996 (1)) Less Avilamycin Consumption (1998 (2)) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics avilamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 71.40 None 23.30 None 21 60 None None None None None
14393 14393 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10247 10247 Production type Conventional Vs raised without antibiotics (RWA) RWA Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14394 14394 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10245 10245 Production type Conventional Vs Kosher Kosher Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 21 33 None None None None None
14395 14395 10089 None 12592 10.12688/f1000research.2-155.v2 Price2013 Prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in retail chicken: Comparing conventional, organic, kosher, and raised without antibiotics United States of America Observational 10246 10246 Production type Conventional Vs organic organic Conventional Chicken Not Specified None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Retail Meat Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 30 33 None None None None None
14396 14396 10216 None 7145 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.71 Aarestrup_2000_MicrDrugResi Association between the use of avilamycin for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers: Epidemiological study and changes over time Canada Other 10628 10628 Avilamycin Consumption A decrease in consumption of avilamycin occurred in the second half of 1996 (see Tables 1 and 2 for more specific AMU info (from 1990-1998)). So, exposed group = second half 1996, referent group = second half 1998. More Avilamycin Consumption (1996 (2)) Less Avilamycin Consumption (1998 (2)) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics avilamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 80.70 None 23.30 None 83 60 None None None None None
14401 14401 10215 None 7143 10.1128/AAC.45.7.2054-2059.2001 Aarestrup_2001_AntAgeandChe Effect of abolishment of the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion on occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal enterococci from food animals in Denmark Denmark Observational 10626 10626 Antimicrobial Ban Compares before (1995) vs after (2000) changes in the antimicrobials authorized for use in growth promotion in Denmark, due to various bans/voluntary withdrawal of use of one or more agents (for specific amounts used (kg) from 1994-2000, see Table 1). 1995 (More Use) 2000 (Less Use) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics avilamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 10 182 None None None None None
14402 14402 10215 None 7143 10.1128/AAC.45.7.2054-2059.2001 Aarestrup_2001_AntAgeandChe Effect of abolishment of the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion on occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal enterococci from food animals in Denmark Denmark Observational 10626 10626 Antimicrobial Ban Compares before (1995) vs after (2000) changes in the antimicrobials authorized for use in growth promotion in Denmark, due to various bans/voluntary withdrawal of use of one or more agents (for specific amounts used (kg) from 1994-2000, see Table 1). 1995 (More Use) 2000 (Less Use) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 80.00 None 46.70 None 10 182 None None None None None
14403 14403 10215 None 7143 10.1128/AAC.45.7.2054-2059.2001 Aarestrup_2001_AntAgeandChe Effect of abolishment of the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion on occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal enterococci from food animals in Denmark Denmark Observational 10626 10626 Antimicrobial Ban Compares before (1995) vs after (2000) changes in the antimicrobials authorized for use in growth promotion in Denmark, due to various bans/voluntary withdrawal of use of one or more agents (for specific amounts used (kg) from 1994-2000, see Table 1). 1995 (More Use) 2000 (Less Use) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 20.00 None 6.00 None 10 182 None None None None None
14404 14404 10215 None 7143 10.1128/AAC.45.7.2054-2059.2001 Aarestrup_2001_AntAgeandChe Effect of abolishment of the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion on occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal enterococci from food animals in Denmark Denmark Observational 10626 10626 Antimicrobial Ban Compares before (1995) vs after (2000) changes in the antimicrobials authorized for use in growth promotion in Denmark, due to various bans/voluntary withdrawal of use of one or more agents (for specific amounts used (kg) from 1994-2000, see Table 1). 1995 (More Use) 2000 (Less Use) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Streptogramins virginiamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 60.00 None 22.50 None 10 182 None None None None None
14405 14405 10215 None 7143 10.1128/AAC.45.7.2054-2059.2001 Aarestrup_2001_AntAgeandChe Effect of abolishment of the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion on occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal enterococci from food animals in Denmark Denmark Observational 10626 10626 Antimicrobial Ban Compares before (1995) vs after (2000) changes in the antimicrobials authorized for use in growth promotion in Denmark, due to various bans/voluntary withdrawal of use of one or more agents (for specific amounts used (kg) from 1994-2000, see Table 1). 1995 (More Use) 2000 (Less Use) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics avilamycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.50 None 49 196 None None None None None
14406 14406 10215 None 7143 10.1128/AAC.45.7.2054-2059.2001 Aarestrup_2001_AntAgeandChe Effect of abolishment of the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion on occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal enterococci from food animals in Denmark Denmark Observational 10626 10626 Antimicrobial Ban Compares before (1995) vs after (2000) changes in the antimicrobials authorized for use in growth promotion in Denmark, due to various bans/voluntary withdrawal of use of one or more agents (for specific amounts used (kg) from 1994-2000, see Table 1). 1995 (More Use) 2000 (Less Use) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 93.90 None 28.10 None 49 196 None None None None None
14407 14407 10215 None 7143 10.1128/AAC.45.7.2054-2059.2001 Aarestrup_2001_AntAgeandChe Effect of abolishment of the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion on occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal enterococci from food animals in Denmark Denmark Observational 10626 10626 Antimicrobial Ban Compares before (1995) vs after (2000) changes in the antimicrobials authorized for use in growth promotion in Denmark, due to various bans/voluntary withdrawal of use of one or more agents (for specific amounts used (kg) from 1994-2000, see Table 1). 1995 (More Use) 2000 (Less Use) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus faecalis False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 49 196 None None None None None
14408 14408 10114 None 13340 10.4081/ijas.2009.771 Shtylla2009 Multiple antimicrobial resistance among Avian Escherichia coli strains in Albania United States of America Observational 10323 10323 Production Type 12 intensive farms and 25 rural farms were sampled. Samples were taken post-mortem from laying hens that had died from colibacillosis. Rural farms Intensive farms Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 26 30 None None None None None
14409 14409 10114 None 13340 10.4081/ijas.2009.771 Shtylla2009 Multiple antimicrobial resistance among Avian Escherichia coli strains in Albania United States of America Observational 10323 10323 Production Type 12 intensive farms and 25 rural farms were sampled. Samples were taken post-mortem from laying hens that had died from colibacillosis. Rural farms Intensive farms Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 92.31 None 73.33 None 26 30 None None None None None
14410 14410 10114 None 13340 10.4081/ijas.2009.771 Shtylla2009 Multiple antimicrobial resistance among Avian Escherichia coli strains in Albania United States of America Observational 10324 10324 Production Type 12 intensive farms and 25 rural farms were sampled. Samples were taken post-mortem from laying hens that had died from colibacillosis. AMR is for colistin sulphate. Rural farms Intensive farms Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Polymyxins colistin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 34.62 None 36.67 None 26 30 None None None None None
14411 14411 10114 None 13340 10.4081/ijas.2009.771 Shtylla2009 Multiple antimicrobial resistance among Avian Escherichia coli strains in Albania United States of America Observational 10323 10323 Production Type 12 intensive farms and 25 rural farms were sampled. Samples were taken post-mortem from laying hens that had died from colibacillosis. Rural farms Intensive farms Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 84.62 None 73.33 None 26 30 None None None None None
14412 14412 10114 None 13340 10.4081/ijas.2009.771 Shtylla2009 Multiple antimicrobial resistance among Avian Escherichia coli strains in Albania United States of America Observational 10323 10323 Production Type 12 intensive farms and 25 rural farms were sampled. Samples were taken post-mortem from laying hens that had died from colibacillosis. Rural farms Intensive farms Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 42.31 None 30.00 None 26 30 None None None None None
14413 14413 10114 None 13340 10.4081/ijas.2009.771 Shtylla2009 Multiple antimicrobial resistance among Avian Escherichia coli strains in Albania United States of America Observational 10323 10323 Production Type 12 intensive farms and 25 rural farms were sampled. Samples were taken post-mortem from laying hens that had died from colibacillosis. Rural farms Intensive farms Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 92.31 None 73.33 None 26 30 None None None None None
14414 14414 10114 None 13340 10.4081/ijas.2009.771 Shtylla2009 Multiple antimicrobial resistance among Avian Escherichia coli strains in Albania United States of America Observational 10323 10323 Production Type 12 intensive farms and 25 rural farms were sampled. Samples were taken post-mortem from laying hens that had died from colibacillosis. Rural farms Intensive farms Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 88.46 None 70.00 None 26 30 None None None None None
14415 14415 10114 None 13340 10.4081/ijas.2009.771 Shtylla2009 Multiple antimicrobial resistance among Avian Escherichia coli strains in Albania United States of America Observational 10323 10323 Production Type 12 intensive farms and 25 rural farms were sampled. Samples were taken post-mortem from laying hens that had died from colibacillosis. Rural farms Intensive farms Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 92.31 None 96.67 None 26 30 None None None None None
14416 14416 10114 None 13340 10.4081/ijas.2009.771 Shtylla2009 Multiple antimicrobial resistance among Avian Escherichia coli strains in Albania United States of America Observational 10323 10323 Production Type 12 intensive farms and 25 rural farms were sampled. Samples were taken post-mortem from laying hens that had died from colibacillosis. Rural farms Intensive farms Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Lincosamides lincomycin, combinations None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 96.15 None 66.67 None 26 30 None None None None None
14417 14417 10114 None 13340 10.4081/ijas.2009.771 Shtylla2009 Multiple antimicrobial resistance among Avian Escherichia coli strains in Albania United States of America Observational 10323 10323 Production Type 12 intensive farms and 25 rural farms were sampled. Samples were taken post-mortem from laying hens that had died from colibacillosis. Rural farms Intensive farms Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 26 30 None None None None None
14418 14418 10114 None 13340 10.4081/ijas.2009.771 Shtylla2009 Multiple antimicrobial resistance among Avian Escherichia coli strains in Albania United States of America Observational 10323 10323 Production Type 12 intensive farms and 25 rural farms were sampled. Samples were taken post-mortem from laying hens that had died from colibacillosis. Rural farms Intensive farms Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 93.33 None 26 30 None None None None None
14419 14419 10114 None 13340 10.4081/ijas.2009.771 Shtylla2009 Multiple antimicrobial resistance among Avian Escherichia coli strains in Albania United States of America Observational 10323 10323 Production Type 12 intensive farms and 25 rural farms were sampled. Samples were taken post-mortem from laying hens that had died from colibacillosis. Rural farms Intensive farms Chicken Layers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones marbofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 80.77 None 70.00 None 26 30 None None None None None
14420 14420 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10277 10277 Market Type Traditional market fresh meat samples vs supermarket fresh meat samples. Traditional markets: chickens are from less intensive farms and are slaughtered on-site. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Traditional Market Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None None Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 57.00 None 46.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
14421 14421 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10277 10277 Market Type Traditional market fresh meat samples vs supermarket fresh meat samples. Traditional markets: chickens are from less intensive farms and are slaughtered on-site. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Traditional Market Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None None Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 31.00 None 21.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
14422 14422 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10278 10278 Market Type Traditional market fresh meat samples vs supermarket fresh meat samples. Traditional markets: chickens from less intensive farms, slaughtered on-site. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. AMR for amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. Traditional Market Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None None Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 6.00 None 6.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
14423 14423 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10277 10277 Market Type Traditional market fresh meat samples vs supermarket fresh meat samples. Traditional markets: chickens are from less intensive farms and are slaughtered on-site. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Traditional Market Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None None Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.00 None 6.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
14424 14424 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10277 10277 Market Type Traditional market fresh meat samples vs supermarket fresh meat samples. Traditional markets: chickens are from less intensive farms and are slaughtered on-site. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Traditional Market Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None None Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.00 None 6.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
14425 14425 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10277 10277 Market Type Traditional market fresh meat samples vs supermarket fresh meat samples. Traditional markets: chickens are from less intensive farms and are slaughtered on-site. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Traditional Market Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None None Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 66.00 None 67.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
14426 14426 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10277 10277 Market Type Traditional market fresh meat samples vs supermarket fresh meat samples. Traditional markets: chickens are from less intensive farms and are slaughtered on-site. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Traditional Market Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None None Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 6.00 None 0.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
14427 14427 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10277 10277 Market Type Traditional market fresh meat samples vs supermarket fresh meat samples. Traditional markets: chickens are from less intensive farms and are slaughtered on-site. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Traditional Market Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None None Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 34.00 None 18.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
14428 14428 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10277 10277 Market Type Traditional market fresh meat samples vs supermarket fresh meat samples. Traditional markets: chickens are from less intensive farms and are slaughtered on-site. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Traditional Market Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None None Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 23.00 None 22.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
14429 14429 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10277 10277 Market Type Traditional market fresh meat samples vs supermarket fresh meat samples. Traditional markets: chickens are from less intensive farms and are slaughtered on-site. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Traditional Market Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None None Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 60.00 None 61.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
14430 14430 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10277 10277 Market Type Traditional market fresh meat samples vs supermarket fresh meat samples. Traditional markets: chickens are from less intensive farms and are slaughtered on-site. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Traditional Market Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None None Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 63.00 None 67.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
14431 14431 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10277 10277 Market Type Traditional market fresh meat samples vs supermarket fresh meat samples. Traditional markets: chickens are from less intensive farms and are slaughtered on-site. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Traditional Market Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None None Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 77.00 None 76.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
14432 14432 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10277 10277 Market Type Traditional market fresh meat samples vs supermarket fresh meat samples. Traditional markets: chickens are from less intensive farms and are slaughtered on-site. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Traditional Market Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None None Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides azithromycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 9.00 None 12.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
14433 14433 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10277 10277 Market Type Traditional market fresh meat samples vs supermarket fresh meat samples. Traditional markets: chickens are from less intensive farms and are slaughtered on-site. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Traditional Market Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None None Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 49.00 None 39.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
14434 14434 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10277 10277 Market Type Traditional market fresh meat samples vs supermarket fresh meat samples. Traditional markets: chickens are from less intensive farms and are slaughtered on-site. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Traditional Market Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None None Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 91.00 None 88.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
14435 14435 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10279 10279 Meat Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Supermarket (frozen) Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 64.00 None 46.00 None 14 33 None None None None None
14436 14436 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10279 10279 Meat Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Supermarket (frozen) Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 36.00 None 21.00 None 14 33 None None None None None
14437 14437 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10280 10280 Meat Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. AMR is for amoxicillin and clavulanic acid. Supermarket (frozen) Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 7.00 None 6.00 None 14 33 None None None None None
14438 14438 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10279 10279 Meat Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Supermarket (frozen) Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 6.00 None 14 33 None None None None None
14439 14439 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10279 10279 Meat Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Supermarket (frozen) Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 6.00 None 14 33 None None None None None
14440 14440 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10279 10279 Meat Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Supermarket (frozen) Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 93.00 None 67.00 None 14 33 None None None None None
14441 14441 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10279 10279 Meat Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Supermarket (frozen) Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 14 33 None None None None None
40217 40217 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11324 11324 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
14442 14442 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10279 10279 Meat Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Supermarket (frozen) Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 21.00 None 18.00 None 14 33 None None None None None
14443 14443 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10279 10279 Meat Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Supermarket (frozen) Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 7.00 None 22.00 None 14 33 None None None None None
14444 14444 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10279 10279 Meat Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Supermarket (frozen) Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 57.00 None 61.00 None 14 33 None None None None None
14445 14445 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10279 10279 Meat Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Supermarket (frozen) Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 86.00 None 67.00 None 14 33 None None None None None
14446 14446 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10279 10279 Meat Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Supermarket (frozen) Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 93.00 None 76.00 None 14 33 None None None None None
14447 14447 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10279 10279 Meat Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Supermarket (frozen) Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides azithromycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 12.00 None 14 33 None None None None None
14448 14448 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10279 10279 Meat Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Supermarket (frozen) Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 71.00 None 39.00 None 14 33 None None None None None
14449 14449 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10279 10279 Meat Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. Supermarkets: mechanically slaughtered birds from intensive farms. Supermarket (frozen) Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 100.00 None 88.00 None 14 33 None None None None None
14450 14450 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10282 10282 Meat Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. These numbers represent potential AmpC B-lactamase producers only, which means that isolates have a ceftriaxone MIC of >= 1 mg/L and a cefoxitin MIC of >= 32 mg/L but are ESBL negative. Supermarket (frozen) Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 14 33 None None None None None
14451 14451 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10282 10282 Meat Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. These numbers represent potential AmpC B-lactamase producers only, which means that isolates have a ceftriaxone MIC of >= 1 mg/L and a cefoxitin MIC of >= 32 mg/L but are ESBL negative. Supermarket (frozen) Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 14 33 None None None None None
14452 14452 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10282 10282 Meat Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. These numbers represent potential AmpC B-lactamase producers only, which means that isolates have a ceftriaxone MIC of >= 1 mg/L and a cefoxitin MIC of >= 32 mg/L but are ESBL negative. Supermarket (frozen) Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 14 33 None None None None None
14453 14453 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10283 10283 Meat Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. These numbers represent potential ESBL producers only, which means that isolates have a ceftriaxone MIC of >= 1 mg/L. Supermarket (frozen) Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 14 33 None None None None None
14454 14454 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10283 10283 Meat Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. These numbers represent potential ESBL producers only, which means that isolates have a ceftriaxone MIC of >= 1 mg/L. Supermarket (frozen) Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 14 33 None None None None None
14455 14455 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10281 10281 Meat Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. These numbers represent only those isolates belonging to the Other antimicrobial resistance profile category. Supermarket (frozen) Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None Retail Retail Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 14 33 None None None None None
14456 14456 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10275 10275 Market Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. These numbers represent potential AmpC B-lactamase producers only, which means that isolates have a ceftriaxone MIC of >= 1 mg/L and a cefoxitin MIC of >= 32 mg/L but are ESBL negative. Traditional Market Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None None Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 35 33 None None None None None
14457 14457 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10275 10275 Market Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. These numbers represent potential AmpC B-lactamase producers only, which means that isolates have a ceftriaxone MIC of >= 1 mg/L and a cefoxitin MIC of >= 32 mg/L but are ESBL negative. Traditional Market Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None None Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 35 33 None None None None None
14458 14458 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10275 10275 Market Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. These numbers represent potential AmpC B-lactamase producers only, which means that isolates have a ceftriaxone MIC of >= 1 mg/L and a cefoxitin MIC of >= 32 mg/L but are ESBL negative. Traditional Market Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None None Retail Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 35 33 None None None None None
14459 14459 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10276 10276 Market Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. These numbers represent potential ESBL producers only, which means that isolates have a ceftriaxone MIC of >= 1 mg/L. Traditional Market Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None None Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 35 33 None None None None None
14460 14460 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10276 10276 Market Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. These numbers represent potential ESBL producers only, which means that isolates have a ceftriaxone MIC of >= 1 mg/L. Traditional Market Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None None Retail Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 35 33 None None None None None
14461 14461 10104 None 13096 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 Sary2019 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam Viet Nam Observational 10274 10274 Market Type Supermarket fresh meat samples vs supermarket frozen meat samples. These numbers represent only those isolates belonging to the Other antimicrobial resistance profile category. Traditional Market Supermarket (fresh) Chicken Carcass None None None Retail Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 0 None None None None None 35 33 None None None None None
14462 14462 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None None 1.00 None 32.00 96 59 None None None None None
14463 14463 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides spiramycin None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None None 10.00 None 59.00 96 59 None None None None None
14464 14464 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Lincosamides clindamycin None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None None 1.00 None 34.00 96 59 None None None None None
14465 14465 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None None 98.00 None 97.00 96 59 None None None None None
14466 14466 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins phenoxymethylpenicillin None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None None 84.00 None 90.00 96 59 None None None None None
14467 14467 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None None 21.00 None 55.00 96 59 None None None None None
14468 14468 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None None 88.00 None 88.00 96 59 None None None None None
14469 14469 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None None 76.00 None 92.00 96 59 None None None None None
14470 14470 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus Combination False None False None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 96 59 None None None None None
14471 14471 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None 0.00 None 4.00 45 27 None None None None None
14472 14472 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides spiramycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None 20.00 None 67.00 45 27 None None None None None
14473 14473 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Lincosamides clindamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None 2.00 None 41.00 45 27 None None None None None
14474 14474 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None 96.00 None 93.00 45 27 None None None None None
14475 14475 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins phenoxymethylpenicillin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None 69.00 None 82.00 45 27 None None None None None
14476 14476 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None 36.00 None 70.00 45 27 None None None None None
14477 14477 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None 87.00 None 100.00 45 27 None None None None None
14478 14478 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None 73.00 None 92.00 45 27 None None None None None
14479 14479 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 45 27 None None None None None
14480 14480 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 39 24 None None None None None
14481 14481 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None None 0.00 None 71.00 39 24 None None None None None
14482 14482 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides spiramycin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None None 0.00 None 63.00 39 24 None None None None None
14483 14483 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Lincosamides clindamycin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None None 0.00 None 33.00 39 24 None None None None None
14484 14484 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 39 24 None None None None None
14485 14485 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins phenoxymethylpenicillin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 39 24 None None None None None
14486 14486 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None None 5.00 None 33.00 39 24 None None None None None
14487 14487 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None None 87.00 None 79.00 39 24 None None None None None
14488 14488 10251 None 7936 10.1128/JCM.39.11.4193-4195.2001 Boerlin_2001_JoofClMi Antimicrobial growth promoter ban and resistance to macrolides and vancomycin in enterococci from pigs Switzerland Observational 10743 10743 Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter Comparing samples from farms using Tylosin as an antimcorbial growth promoter before and after ban on antimicorbial growth promoters Antimicrobial use no use Swine Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus Other False None False None None None None None 82.00 None 92.00 39 24 None None None None None
14489 14489 10326 None 13074 10.3168/jds.2016-11839 Santman.Berends_2017_JoofDaSc Prevalence and risk factors for extended-spectrum -lactamase or AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in organic dairy herds in the Netherlands Netherlands Other 10980 10980 Presence of Cats Presence of horses on the farm. AMR- counts pertain to ESBL/AmpC-unsuspected herds, and AMR+ counts pertain to ESBL-AmpC-positive herds. Cats Present No Cats Present Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd None None None Escherichia coli False None False 7 70 5 8 None None None None 77 13 None None None None None
14490 14490 10326 None 13074 10.3168/jds.2016-11839 Santman.Berends_2017_JoofDaSc Prevalence and risk factors for extended-spectrum -lactamase or AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in organic dairy herds in the Netherlands Netherlands Other 10976 10976 Milk Type Type of milk that is fed to the female calves after colostrum intake. AMR- counts pertain to ESBL/AmpC-unsuspected herds, and AMR+ counts pertain to ESBL-AmpC-positive herds. Milk Replacer Whole Milk Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd None None None Escherichia coli False None False 4 6 8 72 None None None None 10 80 None None None None None
14491 14491 10326 None 13074 10.3168/jds.2016-11839 Santman.Berends_2017_JoofDaSc Prevalence and risk factors for extended-spectrum -lactamase or AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in organic dairy herds in the Netherlands Netherlands Other 10977 10977 Milk Type Type of milk that is fed to the male calves after colostrum intake. AMR- counts pertain to ESBL/AmpC-unsuspected herds, and AMR+ counts pertain to ESBL-AmpC-positive herds. Milk Replacer Whole Milk Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd None None None Escherichia coli False None False 3 5 9 73 None None None None 8 82 None None None None None
14492 14492 10326 None 13074 10.3168/jds.2016-11839 Santman.Berends_2017_JoofDaSc Prevalence and risk factors for extended-spectrum -lactamase or AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in organic dairy herds in the Netherlands Netherlands Other 10973 10973 Housing Type The type of housing used for the milking cows. AMR- counts pertain to ESBL/AmpC-unsuspected herds, and AMR+ counts pertain to ESBL-AmpC-positive herds. Cubicles + Slatted Floor Cubicles + Solid Floor Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd None None None Escherichia coli False None False 6 46 3 9 None None None None 52 12 None None None None None
14493 14493 10326 None 13074 10.3168/jds.2016-11839 Santman.Berends_2017_JoofDaSc Prevalence and risk factors for extended-spectrum -lactamase or AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in organic dairy herds in the Netherlands Netherlands Other 10974 10974 Housing Type The type of housing used for the milking cows. AMR- counts pertain to ESBL/AmpC-unsuspected herds, and AMR+ counts pertain to ESBL-AmpC-positive herds. Cubicles + Slatted Floor Other Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd None None None Escherichia coli False None False 6 46 3 23 None None None None 52 26 None None None None None
14494 14494 10326 None 13074 10.3168/jds.2016-11839 Santman.Berends_2017_JoofDaSc Prevalence and risk factors for extended-spectrum -lactamase or AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in organic dairy herds in the Netherlands Netherlands Other 10975 10975 Housing Type The type of housing used for the milking cows. AMR- counts pertain to ESBL/AmpC-unsuspected herds, and AMR+ counts pertain to ESBL-AmpC-positive herds. Cubicles + Solid Floor Other Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd None None None Escherichia coli False None False 3 9 3 23 None None None None 12 26 None None None None None
14495 14495 10326 None 13074 10.3168/jds.2016-11839 Santman.Berends_2017_JoofDaSc Prevalence and risk factors for extended-spectrum -lactamase or AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in organic dairy herds in the Netherlands Netherlands Other 10972 10972 Antimicrobial Treatment Whether or not antimicrobials are used to treat calves (<1 yr old) for diseases other than respiratory syndromes/diarrhea (i.e. lameness). AMU info in Fig. 1. AMR- counts pertain to ESBL/AmpC-unsuspected herds (AMR+ = ESBL-AmpC-positive herds). Antimicrobial Treatment (less limited) Antimicrobial Treatment (more limited) Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd None None None Escherichia coli False None False 9 38 3 40 None None None None 47 43 None None None None None
14496 14496 10326 None 13074 10.3168/jds.2016-11839 Santman.Berends_2017_JoofDaSc Prevalence and risk factors for extended-spectrum -lactamase or AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in organic dairy herds in the Netherlands Netherlands Other 10979 10979 Parenteral Treatment Whether or not parenteral treatment is sometimes applied for clinical mastitis. AMR- counts pertain to ESBL/AmpC-unsuspected herds, and AMR+ counts pertain to ESBL-AmpC-positive herds. Parenteral Treatment for Clinical Mastitis No Parenteral Treatment for Clinical Mastitis Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd None None None Escherichia coli False None False 8 27 4 51 None None None None 35 55 None None None None None
14497 14497 10326 None 13074 10.3168/jds.2016-11839 Santman.Berends_2017_JoofDaSc Prevalence and risk factors for extended-spectrum -lactamase or AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in organic dairy herds in the Netherlands Netherlands Other 10978 10978 Milking System Type of milking system used. AMR- counts pertain to ESBL/AmpC-unsuspected herds, and AMR+ counts pertain to ESBL-AmpC-positive herds. Automatic Conventional Cattle Dairy Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Herd None None None Escherichia coli False None False 4 12 8 66 None None None None 16 74 None None None None None
30199 30199 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10853 10853 Erythromycin Use Erythromycin Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 32 57 None None None None 95.000
30200 30200 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10859 10859 Gentamycin Use Gentamycin Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 32 57 None None None None 95.000
30201 30201 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10863 10863 Metronidazole Use Metronidazole Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Nitroimidazole derivatives metronidazole None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 50.17 None 57.89 None 32 57 None None None None 95.000
30202 30202 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10865 10865 Nalidixic Acid Use Nalidixic Acid Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 53.30 None 40.54 None 32 57 None None None None 95.000
30203 30203 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10867 10867 Neomycin Use Neomycin Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides neomycin None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 6.47 None 3.51 None 32 57 None None None None 95.000
30204 30204 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10871 10871 Streptomycin Use Streptomycin Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 6.47 None 0.00 None 32 57 None None None None 95.000
30205 30205 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10875 10875 Sulfamethoxazole Use Sulfamethoxazole Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 3.14 None 5.39 None 32 57 None None None None 95.000
30206 30206 10292 None 10012 10.1080/02652030802014930 Hoogenboom_2008_FAaC.PACACEaRA Contaminants and microorganisms in Dutch organic food products: A comparison with conventional products Netherlands Observational 10873 10873 Sulfamethoxazole and Trimethoprim Use Sulfamethoxazole and Trimethoprim Use organic conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Campylobacter None False None False None None None None 6.20 None 7.30 None 32 57 None None None None 95.000
30207 30207 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 9.00 None 16.00 None 150 542 None None None None 95.000
30208 30208 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 9.00 None 15.00 None 150 542 None None None None 95.000
30209 30209 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 9.00 None 15.00 None 150 542 None None None None 95.000
30210 30210 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 150 542 None None None None 95.000
30211 30211 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 27.00 None 27.00 None 150 542 None None None None 95.000
30212 30212 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Macrolides azithromycin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 150 542 None None None None 95.000
30213 30213 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 9.00 None 15.00 None 150 542 None None None None 95.000
30214 30214 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 5.00 None 4.00 None 150 542 None None None None 95.000
30215 30215 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 150 542 None None None None 95.000
30216 30216 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 21.00 None 17.00 None 150 542 None None None None 95.000
30217 30217 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 150 542 None None None None 95.000
30218 30218 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 3.00 None 3.00 None 150 542 None None None None 95.000
30219 30219 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 11.00 None 6.00 None 150 542 None None None None 95.000
30220 30220 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 19.00 None 13.00 None 150 542 None None None None 95.000
30221 30221 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia None False None False None None None None 17.00 None 24.00 None 118 153 None None None None 95.000
30222 30222 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. False None False None None None None 13.00 None 22.00 None 118 153 None None None None 95.000
30223 30223 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia spp. False None False None None None None 15.00 None 22.00 None 118 153 None None None None 95.000
30224 30224 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 118 153 None None None None 95.000
30225 30225 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia None False None False None None None None 32.00 None 38.00 None 118 153 None None None None 95.000
30226 30226 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Macrolides azithromycin None Escherichia spp. False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 118 153 None None None None 95.000
30227 30227 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia spp. False None False None None None None 15.00 None 22.00 None 118 153 None None None None 95.000
30228 30228 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia spp. False None False None None None None 13.00 None 7.00 None 118 153 None None None None 95.000
30229 30229 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia spp. False None False None None None None 4.00 None 0.00 None 118 153 None None None None 95.000
30230 30230 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia spp. False None False None None None None 23.00 None 33.00 None 118 153 None None None None 95.000
30231 30231 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia spp. False None False None None None None 2.00 None 3.00 None 118 153 None None None None 95.000
30232 30232 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia spp. False None False None None None None 3.00 None 3.00 None 118 153 None None None None 95.000
30233 30233 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia spp. False None False None None None None 23.00 None 18.00 None 118 153 None None None None 95.000
30234 30234 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10652 10652 Production Stage Production Stage chick placement pre-harvest Chicken None None None None None Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia None False None False None None None None 42.00 None 53.00 None 118 153 None None None None 95.000
30235 30235 10227 None 7271 Agunos_2018_CaJoofVeRe Changes in antimicrobial resistance levels among escherichia coli, salmonella, and campylobacter in Ontario broiler chickens between 2003 and 2015 Canada Observational 10651 10651 None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None False None False None None None None None None None None None None None None None None 95.000
40000 40000 40000 None 40000 Perrin.Guyomard2020 Decrease in fluoroquinolone use in French poultry and pig production and changes in resistance among E. coli and Campylobacter France Observational 11301 11301 AMU Policy Change: Incentive Tools to Reduce AMU of Critically Important Antimicrobials Before (2014) vs after (2016) incentive tools for reducing AMU of critically important antimicrobials, i.e. prohibition on discounts, rebates, reductions (in effect Jan 1 2015). Non-wild-type (ECOFF) considered resistant. Caecal sample @ abattoir (host su 2016: AMU reduction incentive tools in place 2014: No AMU reduction incentive tools Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni True Web Plot Digitizer True None None None None 49.99 None 48.20 None 164 174 None None None None 95.000
40001 40001 40000 None 40000 Perrin.Guyomard2020 Decrease in fluoroquinolone use in French poultry and pig production and changes in resistance among E. coli and Campylobacter France Observational 11301 11301 AMU Policy Change: Incentive Tools to Reduce AMU of Critically Important Antimicrobials Before (2014) vs after (2016) incentive tools for reducing AMU of critically important antimicrobials, i.e. prohibition on discounts, rebates, reductions (in effect Jan 1 2015). Non-wild-type (ECOFF) considered resistant. Caecal sample @ abattoir (host su 2016: AMU reduction incentive tools in place 2014: No AMU reduction incentive tools Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False Web Plot Digitizer False None None None None 58.00 None 56.00 None 164 174 None None None None 95.000
40002 40002 40000 None 40000 Perrin.Guyomard2020 Decrease in fluoroquinolone use in French poultry and pig production and changes in resistance among E. coli and Campylobacter France Observational 11303 11303 AMU Policy Changes: Incentive Tools to Reduce AMU of Critically Important Antimicrobials (CIAs) & Ban of Preventive Use of CIAs Before (2014) vs after (2018) incentive tools for reducing AMU of critically important antimicrobials, i.e. prohibition on discounts, rebates, reductions (in effect Jan 1 2015) & ban of preventive CIA use (in effect 2016). Non-wild-type (ECOFF) considered 2018: AMU reduction incentive tools and preventive CIA use ban in place 2014: No AMU reduction incentive tools Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni True Web Plot Digitizer True None None None None 55.68 None 48.20 None 183 174 None None None None 95.000
40003 40003 40000 None 40000 Perrin.Guyomard2020 Decrease in fluoroquinolone use in French poultry and pig production and changes in resistance among E. coli and Campylobacter France Observational 11303 11303 AMU Policy Changes: Incentive Tools to Reduce AMU of Critically Important Antimicrobials (CIAs) & Ban of Preventive Use of CIAs Before (2014) vs after (2018) incentive tools for reducing AMU of critically important antimicrobials, i.e. prohibition on discounts, rebates, reductions (in effect Jan 1 2015) & ban of preventive CIA use (in effect 2016). Non-wild-type (ECOFF) considered 2018: AMU reduction incentive tools and preventive CIA use ban in place 2014: No AMU reduction incentive tools Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False Web Plot Digitizer False None None None None 63.00 None 56.00 None 183 174 None None None None 95.000
40004 40004 40000 None 40000 Perrin.Guyomard2020 Decrease in fluoroquinolone use in French poultry and pig production and changes in resistance among E. coli and Campylobacter France Observational 11301 11301 AMU Policy Change: Incentive Tools to Reduce AMU of Critically Important Antimicrobials Before (2014) vs after (2016) incentive tools for reducing AMU of critically important antimicrobials, i.e. prohibition on discounts, rebates, reductions (in effect Jan 1 2015). Non-wild-type (ECOFF) considered resistant. Caecal sample @ abattoir (host su 2016: AMU reduction incentive tools in place 2014: No AMU reduction incentive tools Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer True None None None None 24.40 None 21.30 None 182 239 None None None None 95.000
40005 40005 40000 None 40000 Perrin.Guyomard2020 Decrease in fluoroquinolone use in French poultry and pig production and changes in resistance among E. coli and Campylobacter France Observational 11303 11303 AMU Policy Changes: Incentive Tools to Reduce AMU of Critically Important Antimicrobials (CIAs) & Ban of Preventive Use of CIAs Before (2014) vs after (2018) incentive tools for reducing AMU of critically important antimicrobials, i.e. prohibition on discounts, rebates, reductions (in effect Jan 1 2015) & ban of preventive CIA use (in effect 2016). Non-wild-type (ECOFF) considered 2018: AMU reduction incentive tools and preventive CIA use ban in place 2014: No AMU reduction incentive tools Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False Web Plot Digitizer False None None None None 15.90 None 21.30 None 214 239 None None None None 95.000
40006 40006 40000 None 40000 Perrin.Guyomard2020 Decrease in fluoroquinolone use in French poultry and pig production and changes in resistance among E. coli and Campylobacter France Observational 11300 11300 AMU Policy Change: Incentive Tools to Reduce AMU of Critically Important Antimicrobials Before (2014) vs after (2016) incentive tools for reducing AMU of critically important antimicrobials, i.e. prohibition on discounts, rebates, reductions (in effect Jan 1 2015). High level resistance (> 1 ug/mL: clinical breakpoint). Caecal sample @ abatt 2016: AMU reduction incentive tools in place 2014: No AMU reduction incentive tools Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer True None None None None 8.29 None 9.20 None 182 239 None None None None 95.000
40007 40007 40000 None 40000 Perrin.Guyomard2020 Decrease in fluoroquinolone use in French poultry and pig production and changes in resistance among E. coli and Campylobacter France Observational 11302 11302 AMU Policy Changes: Incentive Tools to Reduce AMU of Critically Important Antimicrobials (CIAs) & Ban of Preventive Use of CIAs Before (2014) vs after (2018) incentive tools for reducing AMU of critically important antimicrobials, i.e. prohibition on discounts, rebates, reductions (in effect Jan 1 2015) & ban of preventive CIA use (in effect 2016). High level resistance (> 1 ug/mL 2018: AMU reduction incentive tools and preventive CIA use ban in place 2014: No AMU reduction incentive tools Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False Web Plot Digitizer False None None None None 3.70 None 9.20 None 214 239 None None None None 95.000
40008 40008 40000 None 40000 Perrin.Guyomard2020 Decrease in fluoroquinolone use in French poultry and pig production and changes in resistance among E. coli and Campylobacter France Observational 11301 11301 AMU Policy Change: Incentive Tools to Reduce AMU of Critically Important Antimicrobials Before (2014) vs after (2016) incentive tools for reducing AMU of critically important antimicrobials, i.e. prohibition on discounts, rebates, reductions (in effect Jan 1 2015). Non-wild-type (ECOFF) considered resistant. Caecal sample @ abattoir (host su 2016: AMU reduction incentive tools in place 2014: No AMU reduction incentive tools Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False Web Plot Digitizer False None None None None 21.40 None 20.10 None 182 239 None None None None 95.000
40009 40009 40000 None 40000 Perrin.Guyomard2020 Decrease in fluoroquinolone use in French poultry and pig production and changes in resistance among E. coli and Campylobacter France Observational 11303 11303 AMU Policy Changes: Incentive Tools to Reduce AMU of Critically Important Antimicrobials (CIAs) & Ban of Preventive Use of CIAs Before (2014) vs after (2018) incentive tools for reducing AMU of critically important antimicrobials, i.e. prohibition on discounts, rebates, reductions (in effect Jan 1 2015) & ban of preventive CIA use (in effect 2016). Non-wild-type (ECOFF) considered 2018: AMU reduction incentive tools and preventive CIA use ban in place 2014: No AMU reduction incentive tools Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False Web Plot Digitizer False None None None None 12.60 None 20.10 None 214 239 None None None None 95.000
40010 40010 40000 None 40000 Perrin.Guyomard2020 Decrease in fluoroquinolone use in French poultry and pig production and changes in resistance among E. coli and Campylobacter France Observational 11301 11301 AMU Policy Change: Incentive Tools to Reduce AMU of Critically Important Antimicrobials Before (2014) vs after (2016) incentive tools for reducing AMU of critically important antimicrobials, i.e. prohibition on discounts, rebates, reductions (in effect Jan 1 2015). Non-wild-type (ECOFF) considered resistant. Caecal sample @ abattoir (host su 2016: AMU reduction incentive tools in place 2014: No AMU reduction incentive tools Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter jejuni False Web Plot Digitizer False 0 None 1 None None None None None 164 174 None None None None 95.000
40011 40011 40000 None 40000 Perrin.Guyomard2020 Decrease in fluoroquinolone use in French poultry and pig production and changes in resistance among E. coli and Campylobacter France Observational 11303 11303 AMU Policy Changes: Incentive Tools to Reduce AMU of Critically Important Antimicrobials (CIAs) & Ban of Preventive Use of CIAs Before (2014) vs after (2018) incentive tools for reducing AMU of critically important antimicrobials, i.e. prohibition on discounts, rebates, reductions (in effect Jan 1 2015) & ban of preventive CIA use (in effect 2016). Non-wild-type (ECOFF) considered 2018: AMU reduction incentive tools and preventive CIA use ban in place 2014: No AMU reduction incentive tools Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter jejuni False Web Plot Digitizer False 0 None 1 None None None None None 183 174 None None None None None
40012 40012 40000 None 40000 Perrin.Guyomard2020 Decrease in fluoroquinolone use in French poultry and pig production and changes in resistance among E. coli and Campylobacter France Observational 11301 11301 AMU Policy Change: Incentive Tools to Reduce AMU of Critically Important Antimicrobials Before (2014) vs after (2016) incentive tools for reducing AMU of critically important antimicrobials, i.e. prohibition on discounts, rebates, reductions (in effect Jan 1 2015). Non-wild-type (ECOFF) considered resistant. Caecal sample @ abattoir (host su 2016: AMU reduction incentive tools in place 2014: No AMU reduction incentive tools Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Other aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter jejuni False Web Plot Digitizer False 0 None 1 None None None None None 164 174 None None None None None
40013 40013 40000 None 40000 Perrin.Guyomard2020 Decrease in fluoroquinolone use in French poultry and pig production and changes in resistance among E. coli and Campylobacter France Observational 11303 11303 AMU Policy Changes: Incentive Tools to Reduce AMU of Critically Important Antimicrobials (CIAs) & Ban of Preventive Use of CIAs Before (2014) vs after (2018) incentive tools for reducing AMU of critically important antimicrobials, i.e. prohibition on discounts, rebates, reductions (in effect Jan 1 2015) & ban of preventive CIA use (in effect 2016). Non-wild-type (ECOFF) considered 2018: AMU reduction incentive tools and preventive CIA use ban in place 2014: No AMU reduction incentive tools Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table Isolate Other aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter jejuni False Web Plot Digitizer False 0 None 1 None None None None None 183 174 None None None None None
40014 40014 40001 None 40001 Tenhagen2020 Comparison of antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter isolates from conventional and organic turkey meat in Germany Germany Observational 11304 11304 Production type Conventional vs organic, sampled in 2018 across Germany (# of samples in each region distributed according to the human population distribution). European organic production (Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007): AMU restricted to necessary cases, strict Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli False Web Plot Digitizer False 19 None 18 None None None None None 22 22 None None None None None
40015 40015 40001 None 40001 Tenhagen2020 Comparison of antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter isolates from conventional and organic turkey meat in Germany Germany Observational 11304 11304 Production type Conventional vs organic, sampled in 2018 across Germany (# of samples in each region distributed according to the human population distribution). European organic production (Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007): AMU restricted to necessary cases, strict Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli False Web Plot Digitizer False 1 None 3 None None None None None 22 22 None None None None None
40016 40016 40001 None 40001 Tenhagen2020 Comparison of antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter isolates from conventional and organic turkey meat in Germany Germany Observational 11304 11304 Production type Conventional vs organic, sampled in 2018 across Germany (# of samples in each region distributed according to the human population distribution). European organic production (Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007): AMU restricted to necessary cases, strict Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Other aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter coli False Web Plot Digitizer False 0 None 0 None None None None None 22 22 None None None None None
40017 40017 40001 None 40001 Tenhagen2020 Comparison of antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter isolates from conventional and organic turkey meat in Germany Germany Observational 11304 11304 Production type Conventional vs organic, sampled in 2018 across Germany (# of samples in each region distributed according to the human population distribution). European organic production (Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007): AMU restricted to necessary cases, strict Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter coli False Web Plot Digitizer False 19 None 18 None None None None None 22 22 None None None None None
40018 40018 40001 None 40001 Tenhagen2020 Comparison of antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter isolates from conventional and organic turkey meat in Germany Germany Observational 11304 11304 Production type Conventional vs organic, sampled in 2018 across Germany (# of samples in each region distributed according to the human population distribution). European organic production (Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007): AMU restricted to necessary cases, strict Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Campylobacter coli False Web Plot Digitizer False 1 None 4 None None None None None 22 22 None None None None None
40019 40019 40001 None 40001 Tenhagen2020 Comparison of antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter isolates from conventional and organic turkey meat in Germany Germany Observational 11304 11304 Production type Conventional vs organic, sampled in 2018 across Germany (# of samples in each region distributed according to the human population distribution). European organic production (Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007): AMU restricted to necessary cases, strict Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli False Web Plot Digitizer w. prevalence-to-count conversion False 15 None 18 None None None None None 22 22 None None None None None
40020 40020 40001 None 40001 Tenhagen2020 Comparison of antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter isolates from conventional and organic turkey meat in Germany Germany Observational 11304 11304 Production type Conventional vs organic, sampled in 2018 across Germany (# of samples in each region distributed according to the human population distribution). European organic production (Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007): AMU restricted to necessary cases, strict Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni False Web Plot Digitizer w. prevalence-to-count conversion False 24 None 54 None None None None None 51 70 None None None None None
40021 40021 40001 None 40001 Tenhagen2020 Comparison of antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter isolates from conventional and organic turkey meat in Germany Germany Observational 11304 11304 Production type Conventional vs organic, sampled in 2018 across Germany (# of samples in each region distributed according to the human population distribution). European organic production (Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007): AMU restricted to necessary cases, strict Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter jejuni False Web Plot Digitizer w. prevalence-to-count conversion False 0 None 0 None None None None None 51 70 None None None None None
40022 40022 40001 None 40001 Tenhagen2020 Comparison of antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter isolates from conventional and organic turkey meat in Germany Germany Observational 11304 11304 Production type Conventional vs organic, sampled in 2018 across Germany (# of samples in each region distributed according to the human population distribution). European organic production (Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007): AMU restricted to necessary cases, strict Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Other aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter jejuni False Web Plot Digitizer w. prevalence-to-count conversion False 0 None 0 None None None None None 51 70 None None None None None
40023 40023 40001 None 40001 Tenhagen2020 Comparison of antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter isolates from conventional and organic turkey meat in Germany Germany Observational 11304 11304 Production type Conventional vs organic, sampled in 2018 across Germany (# of samples in each region distributed according to the human population distribution). European organic production (Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007): AMU restricted to necessary cases, strict Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter jejuni False Web Plot Digitizer w. prevalence-to-count conversion False 23 None 48 None None None None None 51 70 None None None None None
40024 40024 40001 None 40001 Tenhagen2020 Comparison of antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter isolates from conventional and organic turkey meat in Germany Germany Observational 11304 11304 Production type Conventional vs organic, sampled in 2018 across Germany (# of samples in each region distributed according to the human population distribution). European organic production (Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007): AMU restricted to necessary cases, strict Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Campylobacter jejuni False Web Plot Digitizer False 2 None 2 None None None None None 51 70 None None None None None
40025 40025 40001 None 40001 Tenhagen2020 Comparison of antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter isolates from conventional and organic turkey meat in Germany Germany Observational 11304 11304 Production type Conventional vs organic, sampled in 2018 across Germany (# of samples in each region distributed according to the human population distribution). European organic production (Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007): AMU restricted to necessary cases, strict Organic Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter jejuni False Web Plot Digitizer False 9 None 38 None None None None None 51 70 None None None None None
40026 40026 40005 None 40005 Mughini.Gras2020 Natural immunity in conventionally and organically reared turkeys and its relation with antimicrobial resistance Italy Observational 11305 11305 Production type Conventional: animals bred in littered indoor sheds, max stocking density 62 kg/m^2, no limitation on antimicrobial treatments, vs Organic: stocking density 21 kg/m^2 (indoor area) and 1 kg/m^2 (outdoor area), no more than 3 antimicrobial treatments can b Organic Conventional Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli False Web Plot Digitizer False None None None None 75.00 None 92.90 None 4 28 None None None None None
40027 40027 40005 None 40005 Mughini.Gras2020 Natural immunity in conventionally and organically reared turkeys and its relation with antimicrobial resistance Italy Observational 11305 11305 Production type Conventional: animals bred in littered indoor sheds, max stocking density 62 kg/m^2, no limitation on antimicrobial treatments, vs Organic: stocking density 21 kg/m^2 (indoor area) and 1 kg/m^2 (outdoor area), no more than 3 antimicrobial treatments can b Organic Conventional Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False Manual extraction False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 4 28 None None None None None
40028 40028 40005 None 40005 Mughini.Gras2020 Natural immunity in conventionally and organically reared turkeys and its relation with antimicrobial resistance Italy Observational 11305 11305 Production type Conventional: animals bred in littered indoor sheds, max stocking density 62 kg/m^2, no limitation on antimicrobial treatments, vs Organic: stocking density 21 kg/m^2 (indoor area) and 1 kg/m^2 (outdoor area), no more than 3 antimicrobial treatments can b Organic Conventional Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Third-generation cephalosporins ceftazidime None Escherichia coli False Manual extraction False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 4 28 None None None None None
40029 40029 40005 None 40005 Mughini.Gras2020 Natural immunity in conventionally and organically reared turkeys and its relation with antimicrobial resistance Italy Observational 11305 11305 Production type Conventional: animals bred in littered indoor sheds, max stocking density 62 kg/m^2, no limitation on antimicrobial treatments, vs Organic: stocking density 21 kg/m^2 (indoor area) and 1 kg/m^2 (outdoor area), no more than 3 antimicrobial treatments can b Organic Conventional Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False Manual extraction False None None None None 0.00 None 50.00 None 4 28 None None None None None
40030 40030 40005 None 40005 Mughini.Gras2020 Natural immunity in conventionally and organically reared turkeys and its relation with antimicrobial resistance Italy Observational 11305 11305 Production type Conventional: animals bred in littered indoor sheds, max stocking density 62 kg/m^2, no limitation on antimicrobial treatments, vs Organic: stocking density 21 kg/m^2 (indoor area) and 1 kg/m^2 (outdoor area), no more than 3 antimicrobial treatments can b Organic Conventional Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 50.00 None 64.30 None 4 28 None None None None None
40031 40031 40005 None 40005 Mughini.Gras2020 Natural immunity in conventionally and organically reared turkeys and its relation with antimicrobial resistance Italy Observational 11305 11305 Production type Conventional: animals bred in littered indoor sheds, max stocking density 62 kg/m^2, no limitation on antimicrobial treatments, vs Organic: stocking density 21 kg/m^2 (indoor area) and 1 kg/m^2 (outdoor area), no more than 3 antimicrobial treatments can b Organic Conventional Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Polymyxins colistin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 14.30 None 4 28 None None None None None
40032 40032 40005 None 40005 Mughini.Gras2020 Natural immunity in conventionally and organically reared turkeys and its relation with antimicrobial resistance Italy Observational 11305 11305 Production type Conventional: animals bred in littered indoor sheds, max stocking density 62 kg/m^2, no limitation on antimicrobial treatments, vs Organic: stocking density 21 kg/m^2 (indoor area) and 1 kg/m^2 (outdoor area), no more than 3 antimicrobial treatments can b Organic Conventional Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Amphenicols florfenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 4 28 None None None None None
40033 40033 40005 None 40005 Mughini.Gras2020 Natural immunity in conventionally and organically reared turkeys and its relation with antimicrobial resistance Italy Observational 11305 11305 Production type Conventional: animals bred in littered indoor sheds, max stocking density 62 kg/m^2, no limitation on antimicrobial treatments, vs Organic: stocking density 21 kg/m^2 (indoor area) and 1 kg/m^2 (outdoor area), no more than 3 antimicrobial treatments can b Organic Conventional Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Other aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 50.00 None 4 28 None None None None None
40034 40034 40005 None 40005 Mughini.Gras2020 Natural immunity in conventionally and organically reared turkeys and its relation with antimicrobial resistance Italy Observational 11305 11305 Production type Conventional: animals bred in littered indoor sheds, max stocking density 62 kg/m^2, no limitation on antimicrobial treatments, vs Organic: stocking density 21 kg/m^2 (indoor area) and 1 kg/m^2 (outdoor area), no more than 3 antimicrobial treatments can b Organic Conventional Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 25.00 None 4 28 None None None None None
40035 40035 40005 None 40005 Mughini.Gras2020 Natural immunity in conventionally and organically reared turkeys and its relation with antimicrobial resistance Italy Observational 11305 11305 Production type Conventional: animals bred in littered indoor sheds, max stocking density 62 kg/m^2, no limitation on antimicrobial treatments, vs Organic: stocking density 21 kg/m^2 (indoor area) and 1 kg/m^2 (outdoor area), no more than 3 antimicrobial treatments can b Organic Conventional Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 50.00 None 60.70 None 4 28 None None None None None
40036 40036 40005 None 40005 Mughini.Gras2020 Natural immunity in conventionally and organically reared turkeys and its relation with antimicrobial resistance Italy Observational 11305 11305 Production type Conventional: animals bred in littered indoor sheds, max stocking density 62 kg/m^2, no limitation on antimicrobial treatments, vs Organic: stocking density 21 kg/m^2 (indoor area) and 1 kg/m^2 (outdoor area), no more than 3 antimicrobial treatments can b Organic Conventional Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 50.00 None 75.00 None 4 28 None None None None None
40037 40037 40005 None 40005 Mughini.Gras2020 Natural immunity in conventionally and organically reared turkeys and its relation with antimicrobial resistance Italy Observational 11305 11305 Production type Conventional: animals bred in littered indoor sheds, max stocking density 62 kg/m^2, no limitation on antimicrobial treatments, vs Organic: stocking density 21 kg/m^2 (indoor area) and 1 kg/m^2 (outdoor area), no more than 3 antimicrobial treatments can b Organic Conventional Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 50.00 None 67.90 None 4 28 None None None None None
40038 40038 40005 None 40005 Mughini.Gras2020 Natural immunity in conventionally and organically reared turkeys and its relation with antimicrobial resistance Italy Observational 11305 11305 Production type Conventional: animals bred in littered indoor sheds, max stocking density 62 kg/m^2, no limitation on antimicrobial treatments, vs Organic: stocking density 21 kg/m^2 (indoor area) and 1 kg/m^2 (outdoor area), no more than 3 antimicrobial treatments can b Organic Conventional Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 75.00 None 89.30 None 4 28 None None None None None
40039 40039 40005 None 40005 Mughini.Gras2020 Natural immunity in conventionally and organically reared turkeys and its relation with antimicrobial resistance Italy Observational 11305 11305 Production type Conventional: animals bred in littered indoor sheds, max stocking density 62 kg/m^2, no limitation on antimicrobial treatments, vs Organic: stocking density 21 kg/m^2 (indoor area) and 1 kg/m^2 (outdoor area), no more than 3 antimicrobial treatments can b Organic Conventional Turkey Not Specified None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Farm Trimethoprim and derivatives trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 50.00 None 57.10 None 4 28 None None None None None
40040 40040 10223 None 7263 10.1089/mdr.2015.0259 Agga_2016_MicrDrugResi Antimicrobial-Resistant Fecal Bacteria from Ceftiofur-Treated and Nonantimicrobial-Treated Comingled Beef Cows at a Cow-Calf Operation United States of America Experimental 10645 10645 Ceftiofur Use Ceftiofur-treated group (treated with ceftiofur + other therapeutic antimicrobials), vs nonantimicrobial-treated group (cows that never received therapeutic antimicrobial treatment). Ceftiofur administered as either ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (Excede Ceftiofur Use No Use Cattle Beef Cows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer True None None None None 17.93 None 21.16 None 93 131 None None None None None
40041 40041 10223 None 7263 10.1089/mdr.2015.0259 Agga_2016_MicrDrugResi Antimicrobial-Resistant Fecal Bacteria from Ceftiofur-Treated and Nonantimicrobial-Treated Comingled Beef Cows at a Cow-Calf Operation United States of America Experimental 10645 10645 Ceftiofur Use Ceftiofur-treated group (treated with ceftiofur + other therapeutic antimicrobials), vs nonantimicrobial-treated group (cows that never received therapeutic antimicrobial treatment). Ceftiofur administered as either ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (Excede Ceftiofur Use No Use Cattle Beef Cows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer True None None None None 99.04 None 96.78 None 93 131 None None None None None
40042 40042 10223 None 7263 10.1089/mdr.2015.0259 Agga_2016_MicrDrugResi Antimicrobial-Resistant Fecal Bacteria from Ceftiofur-Treated and Nonantimicrobial-Treated Comingled Beef Cows at a Cow-Calf Operation United States of America Experimental 10645 10645 Ceftiofur Use Ceftiofur-treated group (treated with ceftiofur + other therapeutic antimicrobials), vs nonantimicrobial-treated group (cows that never received therapeutic antimicrobial treatment). Ceftiofur administered as either ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (Excede Ceftiofur Use No Use Cattle Beef Cows None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Animal Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer True None None None None 19.70 None 20.76 None 93 131 None None None None None
40043 40043 10223 None 7263 10.1089/mdr.2015.0259 Agga_2016_MicrDrugResi Antimicrobial-Resistant Fecal Bacteria from Ceftiofur-Treated and Nonantimicrobial-Treated Comingled Beef Cows at a Cow-Calf Operation United States of America Experimental 10645 10645 Ceftiofur Use Ceftiofur-treated group (treated with ceftiofur + other therapeutic antimicrobials), vs nonantimicrobial-treated group (cows that never received therapeutic antimicrobial treatment). Ceftiofur administered as either ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (Excede Ceftiofur Use No Use Cattle Beef Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 162 207 None None None None None
40044 40044 10223 None 7263 10.1089/mdr.2015.0259 Agga_2016_MicrDrugResi Antimicrobial-Resistant Fecal Bacteria from Ceftiofur-Treated and Nonantimicrobial-Treated Comingled Beef Cows at a Cow-Calf Operation United States of America Experimental 10645 10645 Ceftiofur Use Ceftiofur-treated group (treated with ceftiofur + other therapeutic antimicrobials), vs nonantimicrobial-treated group (cows that never received therapeutic antimicrobial treatment). Ceftiofur administered as either ceftiofur crystalline-free acid (Excede Ceftiofur Use No Use Cattle Beef Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 162 207 None None None None None
40045 40045 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10820 10820 Distiller Grains + Virginiamycin (0.7 mg/kg) Diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + 0.7 mg/kg virginiamycin, vs diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + no virginiamycin. Experimental diets were fed for 49 days total (separate from the prior 28-day adaptation period), and sampling represents an ag Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer True None None None None 31.97 None 38.93 None 72 72 None None None None None
40046 40046 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10820 10820 Distiller Grains + Virginiamycin (0.7 mg/kg) Diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + 0.7 mg/kg virginiamycin, vs diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + no virginiamycin. Experimental diets were fed for 49 days total (separate from the prior 28-day adaptation period), and sampling represents an ag Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer True None None None None 70.02 None 75.96 None 72 72 None None None None None
40047 40047 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10820 10820 Distiller Grains + Virginiamycin (0.7 mg/kg) Diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + 0.7 mg/kg virginiamycin, vs diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + no virginiamycin. Experimental diets were fed for 49 days total (separate from the prior 28-day adaptation period), and sampling represents an ag Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer True None None None None 47.90 None 58.89 None 72 72 None None None None None
40048 40048 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10820 10820 Distiller Grains + Virginiamycin (0.7 mg/kg) Diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + 0.7 mg/kg virginiamycin, vs diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + no virginiamycin. Experimental diets were fed for 49 days total (separate from the prior 28-day adaptation period), and sampling represents an ag Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer True None None None None 38.80 None 44.74 None 72 72 None None None None None
40049 40049 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10820 10820 Distiller Grains + Virginiamycin (0.7 mg/kg) Diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + 0.7 mg/kg virginiamycin, vs diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + no virginiamycin. Experimental diets were fed for 49 days total (separate from the prior 28-day adaptation period), and sampling represents an ag Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Pencillins with extended spectrum ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 72 72 None None None None None
40050 40050 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10820 10820 Distiller Grains + Virginiamycin (0.7 mg/kg) Diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + 0.7 mg/kg virginiamycin, vs diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + no virginiamycin. Experimental diets were fed for 49 days total (separate from the prior 28-day adaptation period), and sampling represents an ag Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 4 None None None None None 72 72 None None None None None
40051 40051 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10820 10820 Distiller Grains + Virginiamycin (0.7 mg/kg) Diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + 0.7 mg/kg virginiamycin, vs diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + no virginiamycin. Experimental diets were fed for 49 days total (separate from the prior 28-day adaptation period), and sampling represents an ag Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 72 72 None None None None None
40052 40052 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10821 10821 Distiller Grains + Virginiamycin (8.9 mg/kg) Diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + 8.9 mg/kg virginiamycin, vs diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + no virginiamycin. Experimental diets were fed for 49 days total (separate from the prior 28-day adaptation period), and sampling represents an ag Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer True None None None None 27.93 None 38.93 None 72 72 None None None None None
40053 40053 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10821 10821 Distiller Grains + Virginiamycin (8.9 mg/kg) Diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + 8.9 mg/kg virginiamycin, vs diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + no virginiamycin. Experimental diets were fed for 49 days total (separate from the prior 28-day adaptation period), and sampling represents an ag Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer True None None None None 69.00 None 75.96 None 72 72 None None None None None
40054 40054 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10821 10821 Distiller Grains + Virginiamycin (8.9 mg/kg) Diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + 8.9 mg/kg virginiamycin, vs diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + no virginiamycin. Experimental diets were fed for 49 days total (separate from the prior 28-day adaptation period), and sampling represents an ag Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer True None None None None 41.96 None 58.89 None 72 72 None None None None None
40055 40055 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10821 10821 Distiller Grains + Virginiamycin (8.9 mg/kg) Diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + 8.9 mg/kg virginiamycin, vs diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + no virginiamycin. Experimental diets were fed for 49 days total (separate from the prior 28-day adaptation period), and sampling represents an ag Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer True None None None None 33.87 None 44.74 None 72 72 None None None None None
40056 40056 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10821 10821 Distiller Grains + Virginiamycin (8.9 mg/kg) Diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + 8.9 mg/kg virginiamycin, vs diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + no virginiamycin. Experimental diets were fed for 49 days total (separate from the prior 28-day adaptation period), and sampling represents an ag Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Pencillins with extended spectrum ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 6 None 0 None None None None None 72 72 None None None None None
40057 40057 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10821 10821 Distiller Grains + Virginiamycin (8.9 mg/kg) Diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + 8.9 mg/kg virginiamycin, vs diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + no virginiamycin. Experimental diets were fed for 49 days total (separate from the prior 28-day adaptation period), and sampling represents an ag Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 4 None None None None None 72 72 None None None None None
40058 40058 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10821 10821 Distiller Grains + Virginiamycin (8.9 mg/kg) Diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + 8.9 mg/kg virginiamycin, vs diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + no virginiamycin. Experimental diets were fed for 49 days total (separate from the prior 28-day adaptation period), and sampling represents an ag Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 1 None None None None None 72 72 None None None None None
40059 40059 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10819 10819 Distiller Grains + Virginiamycin (0.06 mg/kg as V-Max50) Diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + 0.06 mg/kg virginiamycin as V-Max50, vs diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + no virginiamycin. Experimental diets were fed for 49 days total (separate from the prior 28-day adaptation period), and sampling repr Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer True None None None None 14.91 None 38.93 None 72 72 None None None None None
40060 40060 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10819 10819 Distiller Grains + Virginiamycin (0.06 mg/kg as V-Max50) Diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + 0.06 mg/kg virginiamycin as V-Max50, vs diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + no virginiamycin. Experimental diets were fed for 49 days total (separate from the prior 28-day adaptation period), and sampling repr Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfafurazole None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer True None None None None 62.94 None 75.96 None 72 72 None None None None None
40061 40061 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10819 10819 Distiller Grains + Virginiamycin (0.06 mg/kg as V-Max50) Diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + 0.06 mg/kg virginiamycin as V-Max50, vs diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + no virginiamycin. Experimental diets were fed for 49 days total (separate from the prior 28-day adaptation period), and sampling repr Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer True None None None None 43.98 None 58.89 None 72 72 None None None None None
40062 40062 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10819 10819 Distiller Grains + Virginiamycin (0.06 mg/kg as V-Max50) Diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + 0.06 mg/kg virginiamycin as V-Max50, vs diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + no virginiamycin. Experimental diets were fed for 49 days total (separate from the prior 28-day adaptation period), and sampling repr Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer True None None None None 18.96 None 44.74 None 72 72 None None None None None
40063 40063 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10819 10819 Distiller Grains + Virginiamycin (0.06 mg/kg as V-Max50) Diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + 0.06 mg/kg virginiamycin as V-Max50, vs diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + no virginiamycin. Experimental diets were fed for 49 days total (separate from the prior 28-day adaptation period), and sampling repr Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Pencillins with extended spectrum ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 72 72 None None None None None
40064 40064 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10819 10819 Distiller Grains + Virginiamycin (0.06 mg/kg as V-Max50) Diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + 0.06 mg/kg virginiamycin as V-Max50, vs diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + no virginiamycin. Experimental diets were fed for 49 days total (separate from the prior 28-day adaptation period), and sampling repr Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 1 None 4 None None None None None 72 72 None None None None None
40065 40065 10285 None 8999 10.2527/jas.2013-6954 Edrington_2014_JoofAnSc Evaluation of feeding distiller's grains, containing virginiamycin, on antimicrobial susceptibilities in fecal isolates of Enterococcus and Escherichia coli and prevalence of resistance genes in cattle United States of America Experimental 10819 10819 Distiller Grains + Virginiamycin (0.06 mg/kg as V-Max50) Diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + 0.06 mg/kg virginiamycin as V-Max50, vs diet consisting of 8% distiller grains + no virginiamycin. Experimental diets were fed for 49 days total (separate from the prior 28-day adaptation period), and sampling repr Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 72 72 None None None None None
40066 40066 10021 None 10655 10.1128/aem.70.2.752 Khachatryan2004 Role of calf-adapted <i>Escherichia coli</i> in maintenance of antibiotic resistance in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10062 10062 Oxytetracycline Use Calves administered oxytetracycline (Terramycin; TM-50)-containing milk supplement (4.54% TM-50 or ~26 ug/mL). The supplement was added to bulk/waste milk. Control group received an otherwise identical supplement (minus TM-50). Calves in both groups were Oxytetracycline Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer w. prevalence-to-count conversion True 261 None 184 None None None None None 2129 2432 None None None None None
40067 40067 10021 None 10655 10.1128/aem.70.2.752 Khachatryan2004 Role of calf-adapted <i>Escherichia coli</i> in maintenance of antibiotic resistance in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10062 10062 Oxytetracycline Use Calves administered oxytetracycline (Terramycin; TM-50)-containing milk supplement (4.54% TM-50 or ~26 ug/mL). The supplement was added to bulk/waste milk. Control group received an otherwise identical supplement (minus TM-50). Calves in both groups were Oxytetracycline Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer w. prevalence-to-count conversion True 212 None 145 None None None None None 2129 2432 None None None None None
40068 40068 10021 None 10655 10.1128/aem.70.2.752 Khachatryan2004 Role of calf-adapted <i>Escherichia coli</i> in maintenance of antibiotic resistance in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10062 10062 Oxytetracycline Use Calves administered oxytetracycline (Terramycin; TM-50)-containing milk supplement (4.54% TM-50 or ~26 ug/mL). The supplement was added to bulk/waste milk. Control group received an otherwise identical supplement (minus TM-50). Calves in both groups were Oxytetracycline Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer w. prevalence-to-count conversion True 1586 None 1904 None None None None None 2129 2432 None None None None None
40069 40069 10021 None 10655 10.1128/aem.70.2.752 Khachatryan2004 Role of calf-adapted <i>Escherichia coli</i> in maintenance of antibiotic resistance in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10062 10062 Oxytetracycline Use Calves administered oxytetracycline (Terramycin; TM-50)-containing milk supplement (4.54% TM-50 or ~26 ug/mL). The supplement was added to bulk/waste milk. Control group received an otherwise identical supplement (minus TM-50). Calves in both groups were Oxytetracycline Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer w. prevalence-to-count conversion True 1444 None 1828 None None None None None 2129 2432 None None None None None
40070 40070 10021 None 10655 10.1128/aem.70.2.752 Khachatryan2004 Role of calf-adapted <i>Escherichia coli</i> in maintenance of antibiotic resistance in dairy calves United States of America Experimental 10062 10062 Oxytetracycline Use Calves administered oxytetracycline (Terramycin; TM-50)-containing milk supplement (4.54% TM-50 or ~26 ug/mL). The supplement was added to bulk/waste milk. Control group received an otherwise identical supplement (minus TM-50). Calves in both groups were Oxytetracycline Use No Use Cattle Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer w. prevalence-to-count conversion True 1675 None 2071 None None None None None 2129 2432 None None None None None
40071 40071 10003 None 10053 10.1128/aem.70.11.6927-6930.2004 Hoyle2004a Age-related decline in carriage of ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli in young calves United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10002 10002 Production type Organic farms had UK-registered organic status & adhered to the UK organic standards (no animal/group of animals can receive >3 treatment courses of a vet med product or AM agent within 1 year). All calves (org & conventional) were able to suckle their da Organic Conventional Cattle Calves None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Pencillins with extended spectrum ampicillin None Escherichia coli False Web Plot Digitizer False 55 None 87 None None None None None 69 90 None None None None None
40072 40072 10003 None 10053 10.1128/aem.70.11.6927-6930.2004 Hoyle2004a Age-related decline in carriage of ampicillin-resistant Escherichia coli in young calves United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Observational 10003 10003 Production type This data represents fecal samples collected individually from all cattle in the herd (1 year old or older) either before or during the sampling period of each calf cohort. Organic farms had UK-registered organic status & adhered to the UK organic standar Organic Conventional Cattle Beef Cows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Pencillins with extended spectrum ampicillin None Escherichia coli False Web Plot Digitizer False 19 None 114 None None None None None 252 353 None None None None None
40073 40073 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10000 10000 None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None False Web Plot Digitizer False None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40074 40074 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10000 10000 None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None False Manual extraction False None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40075 40075 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10000 10000 None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None False Manual extraction False None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40076 40076 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10000 10000 None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None False Manual extraction False None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40077 40077 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10000 10000 None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None False None False None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40078 40078 99999 None None UNKNOWN UNKNOWN None None 10000 10000 None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None False None False None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40082 40082 10368 None 7891 10.1128/AEM.00252-07 Bibbal_2007_AppandEnvMic Impact of three ampicillin dosage regimens on selection of ampicillin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae and excretion of blaTEM genes in swine feces France Experimental 11073 11073 Ampicillin Use (intramuscular) Ampicillin administered once a day for 7 days as ampicillin sodium (Ampicilline Cadril) in the neck (intramuscularly), at 20 mg/kg of body weight. Pigs were 7 weeks (49 days) old at start of trial. Control group did not receive ampicillin. Extracted data Ampicillin Use No Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer True None None None None 85.56 None 29.09 None 80 120 None None None None None
40083 40083 10368 None 7891 10.1128/AEM.00252-07 Bibbal_2007_AppandEnvMic Impact of three ampicillin dosage regimens on selection of ampicillin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae and excretion of blaTEM genes in swine feces France Experimental 11074 11074 Ampicillin Use (oral, fasted) Ampicillin administered once a day for 7 days via gastric intubation as a medicinal premix (Ampicilline 80 Porc Franvet) dissolved in water, at 20 mg/kg of body weight. Pigs were fasted 16 hours before ampicillin administration and fed 4 hours after ampic Ampicillin Use No Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer True None None None None 100.00 None 29.09 None 80 120 None None None None None
40084 40084 10368 None 7891 10.1128/AEM.00252-07 Bibbal_2007_AppandEnvMic Impact of three ampicillin dosage regimens on selection of ampicillin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae and excretion of blaTEM genes in swine feces France Experimental 11075 11075 Ampicillin Use (oral, fed) Ampicillin administered once a day for 7 days via gastric intubation as a medicinal premix (Ampicilline 80 Porc Franvet) dissolved in water, at 20 mg/kg of body weight, at the end of their morning meal. Control group did not receive ampicillin. Pigs were Ampicillin Use No Use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer True None None None None 100.00 None 29.09 None 80 120 None None None None None
40085 40085 10231 None 7338 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.05.018 Alali_2009_PrevVeteMedi Relationship between level of antibiotic use and resistance among Escherichia coli isolates from integrated multi-site cohorts of humans and swine United States of America Observational 10674 10674 Chlortetracycline use (MMD > 0.04 vs MMD = 0) In-feed chlortetracycline use, obtained from monthly listings of feedgrade antibiotics used (via formulations)(January 2004 - December 2007). MMD (mean monthly dosage) > 0.04 vs MMD = 0 g/swine kg-month. Both groups received other AMs. Samples = composite Chlortetracycline Use (MMD > 0.04) No Chlortetracycline Use (MMD = 0) Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 87 None None None None None 3 109 None None None None None
40086 40086 10056 None 11605 10.3390/ijerph120202150 Mazurek2015 Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from pigs during metaphylactic trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment and in the post-exposure period Poland Experimental 10152 10152 Duration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use S2 (Sows 18 weeks after end of treatment, these are 6 month old first parity sows) vs S1 (Sows 10 weeks after end of treatment, these are 4.5 month old gilts). These herds were subjected to the same metaphylactic program when they were post-weaning piglet 18 Weeks (S2) 10 Weeks (S1) Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Trimethoprim and derivatives trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 43 None 67 None None None None None 62 77 None None None None None
40087 40087 10056 None 11605 10.3390/ijerph120202150 Mazurek2015 Antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from pigs during metaphylactic trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole treatment and in the post-exposure period Poland Experimental 10152 10152 Duration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole use S2 (Sows 18 weeks after end of treatment, these are 6 month old first parity sows) vs S1 (Sows 10 weeks after end of treatment, these are 4.5 month old gilts). These herds were subjected to the same metaphylactic program when they were post-weaning piglet 18 Weeks (S2) 10 Weeks (S1) Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli False None False 58 None 77 None None None None None 62 77 None None None None None
40088 40088 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10947 10947 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Sweden. Organic vaguely described in Intro as In organic food animal production in the EU, several chemical substances and preventive medications are prohibited due to a generally restrictive principle against external inputs [ Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Pencillins with extended spectrum ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 4.20 None 18.30 None 71 71 None None None None 95.000
40089 40089 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10947 10947 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Sweden. Organic vaguely described in Intro as In organic food animal production in the EU, several chemical substances and preventive medications are prohibited due to a generally restrictive principle against external inputs [ Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.40 None 1.40 None 71 71 None None None None 95.000
40090 40090 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10947 10947 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Sweden. Organic vaguely described in Intro as In organic food animal production in the EU, several chemical substances and preventive medications are prohibited due to a generally restrictive principle against external inputs [ Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.40 None 1.40 None 71 71 None None None None 95.000
40091 40091 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10947 10947 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Sweden. Organic vaguely described in Intro as In organic food animal production in the EU, several chemical substances and preventive medications are prohibited due to a generally restrictive principle against external inputs [ Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Other aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 1.40 None 71 71 None None None None 95.000
40092 40092 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10947 10947 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Sweden. Organic vaguely described in Intro as In organic food animal production in the EU, several chemical substances and preventive medications are prohibited due to a generally restrictive principle against external inputs [ Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 1.40 None 71 71 None None None None 95.000
40093 40093 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10947 10947 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Sweden. Organic vaguely described in Intro as In organic food animal production in the EU, several chemical substances and preventive medications are prohibited due to a generally restrictive principle against external inputs [ Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 11.30 None 25.40 None 71 71 None None None None 95.000
40094 40094 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10946 10946 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Italy. Organic vaguely described in Intro as In organic food animal production in the EU, several chemical substances and preventive medications are prohibited due to a generally restrictive principle against external inputs [5 Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 125 125 None None None None 95.000
40095 40095 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10947 10947 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Sweden. Organic vaguely described in Intro as In organic food animal production in the EU, several chemical substances and preventive medications are prohibited due to a generally restrictive principle against external inputs [ Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 8.50 None 25.40 None 71 71 None None None None 95.000
40096 40096 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10947 10947 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Sweden. Organic vaguely described in Intro as In organic food animal production in the EU, several chemical substances and preventive medications are prohibited due to a generally restrictive principle against external inputs [ Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 9.90 None 14.10 None 71 71 None None None None 95.000
40097 40097 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10947 10947 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Sweden. Organic vaguely described in Intro as In organic food animal production in the EU, several chemical substances and preventive medications are prohibited due to a generally restrictive principle against external inputs [ Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Trimethoprim and derivatives trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 1.40 None 19.70 None 71 71 None None None None 95.000
40098 40098 10320 None 12288 10.1371/journal.pone.0157049 sterberg_2016_PLoONE Antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from pigs in organic and conventional farming in four european countries Denmark Observational 10947 10947 Production type Conventional vs Organic in Sweden. Organic vaguely described in Intro as In organic food animal production in the EU, several chemical substances and preventive medications are prohibited due to a generally restrictive principle against external inputs [ Organic Conventional Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 71 71 None None None None 95.000
40099 40099 10288 None 9404 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2008.01110.x Garca.Feliz_2008_ZooandPubHea Antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella enterica isolates from apparently healthy and clinically ill finishing pigs in Spain Spain Observational 10837 10837 Swine Health Apparently healthy vs clinically ill (diarrhea) Clinically Ill (Diarrhea) Apparently Healthy Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Other aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. (Typing Performed) False None False 2 180 6 257 None None None None None None None None None None None
40153 40153 40016 None 7189 10.1038/s41396-018-0200-3 Abraham2018 Dissemination and persistence of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistance encoding IncI1-bla CTXM-1 plasmid among Escherichia coli in pigs Austria None 11319 11319 Ceftiofur Use 2013 (ceftiofur use still in place) vs 2016 (ceftiofur use discontinued in 2014). Other antimicrobials were used in creep/grower feed (and more) starting in 2014 (see text for full description). Resistance=ESC (ceftiofur or cefovecin) Ceftiofur Use (2013) No Ceftiofur Use (2016) Swine Sows None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample None None None Escherichia coli False None False 13 None 14 None None None None None 15 80 None None None None None
40154 40154 40016 None 7189 10.1038/s41396-018-0200-3 Abraham2018 Dissemination and persistence of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistance encoding IncI1-bla CTXM-1 plasmid among Escherichia coli in pigs Austria None 11317 11317 Ceftiofur Use 2013 (ceftiofur use still in place) vs 2016 (ceftiofur use discontinued in 2014). Other antimicrobials were used in creep/grower feed (and more) starting in 2014 (see text for full description). Resistance=ESC (ceftiofur or cefovecin) Ceftiofur Use (2013) No Ceftiofur Use (2016) Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample None None None Escherichia coli False None False 32 None 0 None None None None None 35 60 None None None None None
40155 40155 40016 None 7189 10.1038/s41396-018-0200-3 Abraham2018 Dissemination and persistence of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistance encoding IncI1-bla CTXM-1 plasmid among Escherichia coli in pigs Austria None 11318 11318 Ceftiofur Use 2013 (ceftiofur use still in place) vs 2016 (ceftiofur use discontinued in 2014). Other antimicrobials were used in creep/grower feed (and more) starting in 2014 (see text for full description). Resistance=ESC (ceftiofur or cefovecin) Ceftiofur Use (2013) No Ceftiofur Use (2016) Swine Grower-finisher None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample None None None Escherichia coli False None False 17 None 3 None None None None None 20 60 None None None None None
40156 40156 40023 None 7521 10.2436/20.1501.01.237 Aramas.Freire2015 Unexpected distribution of the fluoroquinolone-resistance gene qnrB in Escherichia coli isolates from different human and poultry origins in Ecuador Ecuador Observational 11321 11321 Production type Broiler chickens in a rural area (from small-scale poultry farms) vs broiler chickens in an industrial poultry operation (kept in coops, received oxytetracycline (10 mg/L) in water)) Rural Small-Scale Operations Industrial Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 214 None 81 None None None None None 955 827 None None None None None
40157 40157 40025 None 7849 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.06.011 Bessegatto2017 Changes in the fecal microbiota of beef cattle caused by change in management and the use of virginiamycin as a growth promoter Brazil None 11323 11323 Virginiamycin use Virginiamycin use for growth promotion (in mineral mix: 0.94 mg/kg/day throughout feedlot period) vs no virg. use. Extracted from exit from feedlot timepoint, Batch 2 (B2) animals only (18 mos old @ feedlot entry, exit 100 d later). Aggreg. Intermed+R Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Pencillins with extended spectrum ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 54 54 None None None None None
40158 40158 40025 None 7849 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.06.011 Bessegatto2017 Changes in the fecal microbiota of beef cattle caused by change in management and the use of virginiamycin as a growth promoter Brazil None 11322 11322 Virginiamycin use Virginiamycin use for growth promotion (in mineral mix: 0.94 mg/kg/day throughout feedlot period) vs no virg. use. Extracted from exit from feedlot timepoint, Batch 2 (B2) animals only (18 mos old @ feedlot entry, exit @ feedlot = 100 d later). Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 54 54 None None None None None
40159 40159 40025 None 7849 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.06.011 Bessegatto2017 Changes in the fecal microbiota of beef cattle caused by change in management and the use of virginiamycin as a growth promoter Brazil None 11322 11322 Virginiamycin use Virginiamycin use for growth promotion (in mineral mix: 0.94 mg/kg/day throughout feedlot period) vs no virg. use. Extracted from exit from feedlot timepoint, Batch 2 (B2) animals only (18 mos old @ feedlot entry, exit @ feedlot = 100 d later). Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 54 54 None None None None None
40160 40160 40025 None 7849 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.06.011 Bessegatto2017 Changes in the fecal microbiota of beef cattle caused by change in management and the use of virginiamycin as a growth promoter Brazil None 11322 11322 Virginiamycin use Virginiamycin use for growth promotion (in mineral mix: 0.94 mg/kg/day throughout feedlot period) vs no virg. use. Extracted from exit from feedlot timepoint, Batch 2 (B2) animals only (18 mos old @ feedlot entry, exit @ feedlot = 100 d later). Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 1.85 None 54 54 None None None None None
40161 40161 40025 None 7849 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.06.011 Bessegatto2017 Changes in the fecal microbiota of beef cattle caused by change in management and the use of virginiamycin as a growth promoter Brazil None 11322 11322 Virginiamycin use Virginiamycin use for growth promotion (in mineral mix: 0.94 mg/kg/day throughout feedlot period) vs no virg. use. Extracted from exit from feedlot timepoint, Batch 2 (B2) animals only (18 mos old @ feedlot entry, exit @ feedlot = 100 d later). Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 54 54 None None None None None
40162 40162 40025 None 7849 10.1016/j.rvsc.2017.06.011 Bessegatto2017 Changes in the fecal microbiota of beef cattle caused by change in management and the use of virginiamycin as a growth promoter Brazil None 11322 11322 Virginiamycin use Virginiamycin use for growth promotion (in mineral mix: 0.94 mg/kg/day throughout feedlot period) vs no virg. use. Extracted from exit from feedlot timepoint, Batch 2 (B2) animals only (18 mos old @ feedlot entry, exit @ feedlot = 100 d later). Virginiamycin Use No Virginiamycin Use Cattle Finishers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 54 54 None None None None None
40163 40163 40022 None 7856 Bettelheim2005 The diversity of Escherichia coli serotypes and biotypes in cattle faeces Australia None 11320 11320 Diet type Molasses + roughage diet (ingredients in text) vs high grain diet (ingredients in text). All steers initially adapted to high grain diet for 1 month. Then allocated to different diets for 30 days (sampling after 30 days). Molasses & Roughage Diet High Grain Diet Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Pencillins with extended spectrum ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 3 None None None None None 3 3 None None None None None
40164 40164 40022 None 7856 Bettelheim2005 The diversity of Escherichia coli serotypes and biotypes in cattle faeces Australia None 11320 11320 Diet type Molasses + roughage diet (ingredients in text) vs high grain diet (ingredients in text). All steers initially adapted to high grain diet for 1 month. Then allocated to different diets for 30 days (sampling after 30 days). Molasses & Roughage Diet High Grain Diet Cattle Beef Steers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Animal Pencillins with extended spectrum ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 1 None None None None None 3 1 None None None None None
40165 40165 40013 None 8498 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.12.034 Cohen.Stuart2012 Comparison of ESBL contamination in organic and conventional retail chicken meat Netherlands None 11313 11313 Production type Raw chicken breasts: 80% samples = supermarkets, 20% = organic butcheries. Conv: 37 d.d.d. AMU/year/animal, preventive & therapeutic. Organic EKO: AMU max 1 therapeutic course, as per SKAL certification body. Meat country of origin varied (see text) Organic: EKO Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Sample None None ESBL - Genomic AST Escherichia coli True Manual extraction False 27 None 60 None None None None None 30 60 None None None None None
40166 40166 40013 None 8498 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.12.034 Cohen.Stuart2012 Comparison of ESBL contamination in organic and conventional retail chicken meat Netherlands None 11314 11314 Production type Raw chicken breasts: 80% samples = supermarkets, 20% = organic butcheries. Conv: 37 d.d.d. AMU/year/animal, preventive & therapeutic. Organic Free Range: AMU not specified. Meat country of origin varied (see text). Organic: Free Range Conventional Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Sample None None ESBL - Genomic AST Escherichia coli True Manual extraction False 5 None 60 None None None None None 8 60 None None None None None
40167 40167 40013 None 8498 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.12.034 Cohen.Stuart2012 Comparison of ESBL contamination in organic and conventional retail chicken meat Netherlands None 11312 11312 Production type Raw chicken breasts: 80% of samples from supermarkets, 20% from organic butcheries. Organic EKO: AMU max one therapeutic course, controlled by SKAL certification body. Organic Free Range: AMU not specified. Meat country of origin varied (see text). Organic: Free Range Organic: EKO Chicken Carcass None None Farm Retail Contingency Table Sample None None ESBL - Genomic AST Escherichia coli True Manual extraction False 5 None 27 None None None None None 8 30 None None None None None
40168 40168 40012 None 9745 10.1093/jac/dku180 Hammerum2014 Characterization of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli obtained from Danish pigs, pig farmers and their families from farms with high or no consumption of third- or fourth-generation cephalosporins Denmark None 11311 11311 Third and fourth-generation cephalosporin use in last year Frequent 3rd & 4th-gen cephalosporin usage in the previous year prior to sampling (usage determined based on # prescriptions over the year) vs no 3rd/4th-gen ceph use. Samples from sows/piglets, weaners, & finishers pooled together. Frequent 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporin use No 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporin use Swine Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Farm None None ESBL - Genomic AST Escherichia coli False None False 15 None 4 None None None None None 19 20 None None None None None
40169 40169 40012 None 9745 10.1093/jac/dku180 Hammerum2014 Characterization of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli obtained from Danish pigs, pig farmers and their families from farms with high or no consumption of third- or fourth-generation cephalosporins Denmark None 11311 11311 Third and fourth-generation cephalosporin use in last year Frequent 3rd & 4th-gen cephalosporin usage in the previous year prior to sampling (usage determined based on # prescriptions over the year) vs no 3rd/4th-gen ceph use. Samples from sows/piglets, weaners, & finishers pooled together. Frequent 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporin use No 3rd and 4th generation cephalosporin use Swine Other None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Sample None None ESBL - Genomic AST Escherichia coli False None False 50 None 13 None None None None None 162 177 None None None None None
40170 40170 40015 None 10312 10.1016/S0007-1935(17)32136-X Jenkinson1980 Effect of dimetridazole in pigs on the number, antibacterial sensitivity and the transferability of resistance among faecal coliforms United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland None 11316 11316 Dimetridazole use DMZ (200 parts/10^6) in feed vs un-medicated (copper sulphate; 190 parts/10^6). Pigs aged 6-8 weeks @ trial start. Acclimatization=21 d, then DMZ for 28 d in 1 group. Extracted No Supplement (no selective media), represents trial days 28,35,42,49. Dimetridazole use No dimetridazole use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides dihydrostreptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 7.90 None 13.30 None 216 163 None None None None None
40171 40171 40015 None 10312 10.1016/S0007-1935(17)32136-X Jenkinson1980 Effect of dimetridazole in pigs on the number, antibacterial sensitivity and the transferability of resistance among faecal coliforms United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland None 11316 11316 Dimetridazole use DMZ (200 parts/10^6) in feed vs un-medicated (copper sulphate; 190 parts/10^6). Pigs aged 6-8 weeks @ trial start. Acclimatization=21 d, then DMZ for 28 d in 1 group. Extracted No Supplement (no selective media), represents trial days 28,35,42,49. Dimetridazole use No dimetridazole use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 216 163 None None None None None
40172 40172 40015 None 10312 10.1016/S0007-1935(17)32136-X Jenkinson1980 Effect of dimetridazole in pigs on the number, antibacterial sensitivity and the transferability of resistance among faecal coliforms United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland None 11316 11316 Dimetridazole use DMZ (200 parts/10^6) in feed vs un-medicated (copper sulphate; 190 parts/10^6). Pigs aged 6-8 weeks @ trial start. Acclimatization=21 d, then DMZ for 28 d in 1 group. Extracted No Supplement (no selective media), represents trial days 28,35,42,49. Dimetridazole use No dimetridazole use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 25.00 None 31.70 None 216 163 None None None None None
40173 40173 40015 None 10312 10.1016/S0007-1935(17)32136-X Jenkinson1980 Effect of dimetridazole in pigs on the number, antibacterial sensitivity and the transferability of resistance among faecal coliforms United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland None 11316 11316 Dimetridazole use DMZ (200 parts/10^6) in feed vs un-medicated (copper sulphate; 190 parts/10^6). Pigs aged 6-8 weeks @ trial start. Acclimatization=21 d, then DMZ for 28 d in 1 group. Extracted No Supplement (no selective media), represents trial days 28,35,42,49. Dimetridazole use No dimetridazole use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 216 163 None None None None None
40174 40174 40015 None 10312 10.1016/S0007-1935(17)32136-X Jenkinson1980 Effect of dimetridazole in pigs on the number, antibacterial sensitivity and the transferability of resistance among faecal coliforms United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland None 11316 11316 Dimetridazole use DMZ (200 parts/10^6) in feed vs un-medicated (copper sulphate; 190 parts/10^6). Pigs aged 6-8 weeks @ trial start. Acclimatization=21 d, then DMZ for 28 d in 1 group. Extracted No Supplement (no selective media), represents trial days 28,35,42,49. Dimetridazole use No dimetridazole use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Pencillins with extended spectrum ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 3.70 None 0.00 None 216 163 None None None None None
40175 40175 40015 None 10312 10.1016/S0007-1935(17)32136-X Jenkinson1980 Effect of dimetridazole in pigs on the number, antibacterial sensitivity and the transferability of resistance among faecal coliforms United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland None 11316 11316 Dimetridazole use DMZ (200 parts/10^6) in feed vs un-medicated (copper sulphate; 190 parts/10^6). Pigs aged 6-8 weeks @ trial start. Acclimatization=21 d, then DMZ for 28 d in 1 group. Extracted No Supplement (no selective media), represents trial days 28,35,42,49. Dimetridazole use No dimetridazole use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives furazolidone None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 216 163 None None None None None
40176 40176 40015 None 10312 10.1016/S0007-1935(17)32136-X Jenkinson1980 Effect of dimetridazole in pigs on the number, antibacterial sensitivity and the transferability of resistance among faecal coliforms United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland None 11315 11315 Dimetridazole use DMZ (200 parts/10^6) in feed vs un-medicated (copper sulphate; 190 parts/10^6). Pigs 6-8 wks @ trial start. Acclimatization=21 d, then DMZ for 28 d in 1 group. Extracted No Supplement (no SM), reps trial ds 28,35,42,49. Resistance=compound sulphonamide Dimetridazole use No dimetridazole use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 7.00 None 13.90 None 216 163 None None None None None
40177 40177 40015 None 10312 10.1016/S0007-1935(17)32136-X Jenkinson1980 Effect of dimetridazole in pigs on the number, antibacterial sensitivity and the transferability of resistance among faecal coliforms United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland None 11316 11316 Dimetridazole use DMZ (200 parts/10^6) in feed vs un-medicated (copper sulphate; 190 parts/10^6). Pigs aged 6-8 weeks @ trial start. Acclimatization=21 d, then DMZ for 28 d in 1 group. Extracted No Supplement (no selective media), represents trial days 28,35,42,49. Dimetridazole use No dimetridazole use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 216 163 None None None None None
40178 40178 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Pencillins with extended spectrum ampicillin None Escherichia coli False None False 42 None 50 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40179 40179 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 4 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40180 40180 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate First-generation cephalosporins cefalotin None Escherichia coli False None False 44 None 37 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40181 40181 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Second-generation cephalosporins cefuroxime None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 5 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40182 40182 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins cefoperazone None Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 4 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40183 40183 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Third-generation cephalosporins ceftazidime None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 5 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40184 40184 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 51 None 57 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40185 40185 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 2 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40186 40186 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40187 40187 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli False None False 17 None 21 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40188 40188 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli False None False 33 None 47 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40189 40189 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Tetracyclines doxycycline None Escherichia coli False None False 24 None 31 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40190 40190 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli False None False 21 None 34 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40191 40191 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 8 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40192 40192 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli False None False 47 None 56 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40193 40193 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate Quinolones norfloxacin None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 1 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40194 40194 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11307 11307 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Gene blaTEM Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None TEM (family) Escherichia coli False None False 37 None 49 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40195 40195 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11306 11306 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Gene blaSHF Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None None Escherichia coli False None False 0 None 0 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40196 40196 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None tet(A) Escherichia coli False None False 22 None 31 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40197 40197 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None tet(B) Escherichia coli False None False 2 None 7 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40198 40198 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None tet(C) Escherichia coli False None False 17 None 26 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40199 40199 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11309 11309 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Gene strA/strB Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None aph(3'')-Ib Escherichia coli False None False 32 None 7 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40200 40200 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None aadA Escherichia coli False None False 31 None 27 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40201 40201 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None sul1 Escherichia coli False None False 29 None 9 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40202 40202 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None sul2 Escherichia coli False None False 22 None 5 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40203 40203 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None sul3 Escherichia coli False None False 19 None 23 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40204 40204 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11310 11310 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In their 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None dfrA1 Escherichia coli False None False 7 None 20 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40205 40205 40010 None 11606 Mazurek2013 The phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli populations isolated from farm animals with different exposure to antimicrobial agents Poland None 11308 11308 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use 8-wk-old piglets (piglets II: after AMU) vs 6-wk-old piglets (I: before AMU). In 6th week of age, piglets administered a post-weaning AMU program: treatment w/sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) & ampicillin. Gene dfrA7/dfrA17 Sulfonamide, co-trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) and ampicillin use No use Swine Weaners None None Farm Farm Contingency Table Isolate None None dfrA7 Escherichia coli False None False 3 None 2 None None None None None 51 59 None None None None None
40218 40218 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11325 11325 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40219 40219 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11325 11325 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40220 40220 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11325 11325 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None Beta-lactam antibacterials, penicillins, combinations with other antibacterials ampicillin, combinations with other antibacterials None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40221 40221 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11325 11325 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40222 40222 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11325 11325 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40223 40223 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11325 11325 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None Other aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40224 40224 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11325 11325 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40225 40225 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11325 11325 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40226 40226 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11325 11325 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40227 40227 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11325 11325 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40228 40228 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11325 11325 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40229 40229 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11325 11325 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Turkey Carcass None None Farm Retail None None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40230 40230 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11326 11326 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40231 40231 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11326 11326 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40232 40232 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11326 11326 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None Beta-lactam antibacterials, penicillins, combinations with other antibacterials ampicillin, combinations with other antibacterials None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40233 40233 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11326 11326 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40234 40234 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11326 11326 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40235 40235 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11326 11326 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None Other aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40236 40236 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11326 11326 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40237 40237 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11326 11326 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40238 40238 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11326 11326 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40239 40239 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11326 11326 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40240 40240 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11326 11326 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40241 40241 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11326 11326 Production Type Organic vs conventional in the USA Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40242 40242 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11327 11327 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40243 40243 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11327 11327 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40244 40244 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11327 11327 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None Beta-lactam antibacterials, penicillins, combinations with other antibacterials ampicillin, combinations with other antibacterials None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40245 40245 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11327 11327 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40246 40246 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11327 11327 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40247 40247 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11327 11327 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None Other aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40248 40248 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11327 11327 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40249 40249 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11327 11327 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40250 40250 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11327 11327 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40251 40251 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11327 11327 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40252 40252 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11327 11327 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40253 40253 10152 None 8703 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 Davis2018 Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims United States of America Observational 11327 11327 Production Type Raised without antibiotics vs conventional in the USA Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail None None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40254 40254 10269 None 8463 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.018 Chuppava_2018_VeteMicr Effects of different types of flooring design on the development of antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in fattening turkeys Germany Experimental 11328 11328 Movement to a new pen (poultry manure samples) Birds moved to new pens (of an identical housing type) partway through a production cycle versus birds that remained in the same pen for the entirety of the production cycle. Trial 1 versus trial 2. Both groups received enrofloxacin. Unclear if poults or adult turkeys. Birds moved to new pens (trial 1) Birds remained in same pens (trial 2) Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm None None Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40255 40255 10269 None 8463 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.018 Chuppava_2018_VeteMicr Effects of different types of flooring design on the development of antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in fattening turkeys Germany Experimental 11328 11328 Movement to a new pen (poultry manure samples) Birds moved to new pens (of an identical housing type) partway through a production cycle versus birds that remained in the same pen for the entirety of the production cycle. Trial 1 versus trial 2. Both groups received enrofloxacin. Unclear if poults or adult turkeys. Birds moved to new pens (trial 1) Birds remained in same pens (trial 2) Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm None None Pencillins with extended spectrum ampicillin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40256 40256 10269 None 8463 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.018 Chuppava_2018_VeteMicr Effects of different types of flooring design on the development of antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in fattening turkeys Germany Experimental 11329 11329 Movement to a new pen (cloacal swab samples) Birds moved to new pens (of an identical housing type) partway through a production cycle versus birds that remained in the same pen for the entirety of the production cycle. Trial 1 versus trial 2. Both groups received enrofloxacin. Unclear if poults or adult turkeys. Birds moved to new pens (trial 1) Birds remained in same pens (trial 2) Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm None None Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
40257 40257 10269 None 8463 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.02.018 Chuppava_2018_VeteMicr Effects of different types of flooring design on the development of antimicrobial resistance in commensal Escherichia coli in fattening turkeys Germany Experimental 11329 11329 Movement to a new pen (cloacal swab samples) Birds moved to new pens (of an identical housing type) partway through a production cycle versus birds that remained in the same pen for the entirety of the production cycle. Trial 1 versus trial 2. Both groups received enrofloxacin. Unclear if poults or adult turkeys. Birds moved to new pens (trial 1) Birds remained in same pens (trial 2) Turkey Adult None None Farm Farm None None Pencillins with extended spectrum ampicillin None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None None
14397 14397 10215 None 7143 10.1128/AAC.45.7.2054-2059.2001 Aarestrup_2001_AntAgeandChe Effect of abolishment of the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion on occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal enterococci from food animals in Denmark Denmark Observational 10625 10625 Antimicrobial Ban Compares before (1995) vs after (2000) changes in the antimicrobials authorized for use in growth promotion in Denmark, due to various bans/voluntary withdrawal of use of one or more agents (for specific amounts used (kg) from 1994-2000, see Table 1). 1995 (More Use) 2000 (Less Use) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Antibiotics avilamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 63.60 None 4.80 None 11 189 None None None None None
14398 14398 10215 None 7143 10.1128/AAC.45.7.2054-2059.2001 Aarestrup_2001_AntAgeandChe Effect of abolishment of the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion on occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal enterococci from food animals in Denmark Denmark Observational 10625 10625 Antimicrobial Ban Compares before (1995) vs after (2000) changes in the antimicrobials authorized for use in growth promotion in Denmark, due to various bans/voluntary withdrawal of use of one or more agents (for specific amounts used (kg) from 1994-2000, see Table 1). 1995 (More Use) 2000 (Less Use) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 54.50 None 12.70 None 11 189 None None None None None
14399 14399 10215 None 7143 10.1128/AAC.45.7.2054-2059.2001 Aarestrup_2001_AntAgeandChe Effect of abolishment of the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion on occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal enterococci from food animals in Denmark Denmark Observational 10625 10625 Antimicrobial Ban Compares before (1995) vs after (2000) changes in the antimicrobials authorized for use in growth promotion in Denmark, due to various bans/voluntary withdrawal of use of one or more agents (for specific amounts used (kg) from 1994-2000, see Table 1). 1995 (More Use) 2000 (Less Use) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 72.70 None 5.80 None 11 189 None None None None None
14400 14400 10215 None 7143 10.1128/AAC.45.7.2054-2059.2001 Aarestrup_2001_AntAgeandChe Effect of abolishment of the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion on occurrence of antimicrobial resistance in fecal enterococci from food animals in Denmark Denmark Observational 10625 10625 Antimicrobial Ban Compares before (1995) vs after (2000) changes in the antimicrobials authorized for use in growth promotion in Denmark, due to various bans/voluntary withdrawal of use of one or more agents (for specific amounts used (kg) from 1994-2000, see Table 1). 1995 (More Use) 2000 (Less Use) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table Isolate Streptogramins virginiamycin None Enterococcus faecium False None False None None None None 27.30 None 33.90 None 11 189 None None None None None
4 None 13 None None 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.06.005 YTD23YDM Antimicrobial resistance in E. coli isolates from conventionally and organically reared poultry: A comparison of agar disc diffusion and Sensi Test Gram-negative methods None Observational 11 None Organic Production Organic chicken Conventionally raised chicken Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 20.00 None 73.30 None 30 30 None None None None None
6 None 13 None None 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.06.005 YTD23YDM Antimicrobial resistance in E. coli isolates from conventionally and organically reared poultry: A comparison of agar disc diffusion and Sensi Test Gram-negative methods None Observational 11 None Organic Production Organic chicken Conventionally raised chicken Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli False None None None None None None 26.70 None 100.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
11 None 13 None None 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.06.005 YTD23YDM Antimicrobial resistance in E. coli isolates from conventionally and organically reared poultry: A comparison of agar disc diffusion and Sensi Test Gram-negative methods None Observational 11 None Organic Production Organic chicken Conventionally raised chicken Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 26.70 None 73.30 None 30 30 None None None None None
10 None 13 None None 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.06.005 YTD23YDM Antimicrobial resistance in E. coli isolates from conventionally and organically reared poultry: A comparison of agar disc diffusion and Sensi Test Gram-negative methods None Observational 11 None Organic Production Organic chicken Conventionally raised chicken Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 40.00 None 100.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
5 None 13 None None 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.06.005 YTD23YDM Antimicrobial resistance in E. coli isolates from conventionally and organically reared poultry: A comparison of agar disc diffusion and Sensi Test Gram-negative methods None Observational 11 None Organic Production Organic chicken Conventionally raised chicken Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins piperacillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 13.30 None 13.30 None 30 30 None None None None None
7 None 13 None None 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.06.005 YTD23YDM Antimicrobial resistance in E. coli isolates from conventionally and organically reared poultry: A comparison of agar disc diffusion and Sensi Test Gram-negative methods None Observational 11 None Organic Production Organic chicken Conventionally raised chicken Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfadimethoxine and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 6.70 None 33.30 None 30 30 None None None None None
9 None 13 None None 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.06.005 YTD23YDM Antimicrobial resistance in E. coli isolates from conventionally and organically reared poultry: A comparison of agar disc diffusion and Sensi Test Gram-negative methods None Observational 11 None Organic Production Organic chicken Conventionally raised chicken Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 46.70 None 40.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
2 None 13 None None 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.06.005 YTD23YDM Antimicrobial resistance in E. coli isolates from conventionally and organically reared poultry: A comparison of agar disc diffusion and Sensi Test Gram-negative methods None Observational 11 None Organic Production Organic chicken Conventionally raised chicken Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 40.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
41 None 21 None None 10.1089/fpd.2019.2680 BZTEGWYP Escherichia coli from Commercial Broiler and Backyard Chickens Share Sequence Types, Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles, and Resistance Genes with Human Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli None Observational 15 None Production Type Backyard Chickens Broiler Chickens Chicken Broilers None None None Abattoir Contingency Table None None None CTX-M-2 Escherichia coli None None None 0 9 2 32 None None None None 9 34 None None None None None
20 None 14 None None 8VLRXDX6 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing None Experimental 12 None Organic Production Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone, combinations None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 16.70 83.30 5.40 94.60 162 112 None None None None None
21 None 14 None None 8VLRXDX6 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing None Experimental 12 None Organic Production Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 10.50 89.50 0.90 99.10 162 112 None None None None None
22 None 14 None None 8VLRXDX6 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing None Experimental 12 None Organic Production Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 0.60 99.40 0.90 99.10 162 112 None None None None None
23 None 14 None None 8VLRXDX6 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing None Experimental 12 None Organic Production Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 1.90 98.10 1.80 98.20 162 112 None None None None None
26 None 14 None None 8VLRXDX6 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing None Experimental 12 None Organic Production Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 9.90 90.10 0.90 99.10 162 112 None None None None None
3 None 13 None None 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.06.005 YTD23YDM Antimicrobial resistance in E. coli isolates from conventionally and organically reared poultry: A comparison of agar disc diffusion and Sensi Test Gram-negative methods None Observational 11 None Organic Production Organic chicken Conventionally raised chicken Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 53.30 None 100.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
69 None 31 None None 10.1111/lam.13581 T8YBAST5 Comparative occurrence of ESBL/AmpC beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Salmonella in contract farm and backyard broilers None Observational 35 None Production Type Backyard (household) vs. Contract chickens (farms) Backyard Contract Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None None None ESBL - Genomic AST Escherichia coli None None None 10 None 22 None None None None None 85 43 None None None None None
34 None 15 None None 10.3382/ps/pey486 JZL5LDZ9 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing None Observational 13 None Organic Production Organic Production Conventional Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 5.90 94.10 8.50 91.50 136 176 None None None None None
35 None 15 None None 10.3382/ps/pey486 JZL5LDZ9 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing None Observational 13 None Organic Production Organic Production Conventional Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides telithromycin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 2.90 97.10 2.30 97.70 136 176 None None None None None
44 None 21 None None 10.1089/fpd.2019.2680 BZTEGWYP Escherichia coli from Commercial Broiler and Backyard Chickens Share Sequence Types, Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles, and Resistance Genes with Human Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli None Observational 15 None Production Type Backyard Chickens Broiler Chickens Chicken Broilers None None None Abattoir Contingency Table None None None CTX-M-27 Escherichia coli None None None 0 9 0 34 None None None None 9 34 None None None None None
37 None 21 None None 10.1089/fpd.2019.2680 BZTEGWYP Escherichia coli from Commercial Broiler and Backyard Chickens Share Sequence Types, Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles, and Resistance Genes with Human Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli None Observational 15 None Production Type Backyard Chickens Broiler Chickens Chicken Broilers None None None Abattoir Contingency Table None None None TEM-1 Escherichia coli None None None 8 1 21 13 None None None None 9 34 None None None None None
38 None 21 None None 10.1089/fpd.2019.2680 BZTEGWYP Escherichia coli from Commercial Broiler and Backyard Chickens Share Sequence Types, Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles, and Resistance Genes with Human Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli None Observational 15 None Production Type Backyard Chickens Broiler Chickens Chicken Broilers None None None Abattoir Contingency Table None None None OXA-1 Escherichia coli None None None 0 9 0 34 None None None None 9 34 None None None None None
39 None 21 None None 10.1089/fpd.2019.2680 BZTEGWYP Escherichia coli from Commercial Broiler and Backyard Chickens Share Sequence Types, Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles, and Resistance Genes with Human Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli None Observational 15 None Production Type Backyard Chickens Broiler Chickens Chicken Broilers None None None Abattoir Contingency Table None None None SHV (family) Escherichia coli None None None 1 8 0 34 None None None None 9 34 None None None None None
40 None 21 None None 10.1089/fpd.2019.2680 BZTEGWYP Escherichia coli from Commercial Broiler and Backyard Chickens Share Sequence Types, Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles, and Resistance Genes with Human Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli None Observational 15 None Production Type Backyard Chickens Broiler Chickens Chicken Broilers None None None Abattoir Contingency Table None None None SHV-2 Escherichia coli None None None 0 9 13 21 None None None None 9 34 None None None None None
42 None 21 None None 10.1089/fpd.2019.2680 BZTEGWYP Escherichia coli from Commercial Broiler and Backyard Chickens Share Sequence Types, Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles, and Resistance Genes with Human Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli None Observational 15 None Production Type Backyard Chickens Broiler Chickens Chicken Broilers None None None Abattoir Contingency Table None None None CTX-M-8 Escherichia coli None None None 0 9 5 29 None None None None 9 34 None None None None None
45 None 21 None None 10.1089/fpd.2019.2680 BZTEGWYP Escherichia coli from Commercial Broiler and Backyard Chickens Share Sequence Types, Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles, and Resistance Genes with Human Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli None Observational 15 None Production Type Backyard Chickens Broiler Chickens Chicken Broilers None None None Abattoir Contingency Table None None None CMY-2 Escherichia coli None None None 0 9 0 34 None None None None 9 34 None None None None None
24 None 14 None None 8VLRXDX6 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing None Experimental 12 None Organic Production Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 9.30 90.70 2.70 97.30 162 112 None None None None None
15 None 14 None None 8VLRXDX6 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing None Experimental 12 None Organic Production Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides azithromycin None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 8.00 92.00 2.70 97.30 162 112 None None None None None
8 None 13 None None 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.06.005 YTD23YDM Antimicrobial resistance in E. coli isolates from conventionally and organically reared poultry: A comparison of agar disc diffusion and Sensi Test Gram-negative methods None Observational 11 None Organic Production Organic chicken Conventionally raised chicken Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 6.70 None 20.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
25 None 14 None None 8VLRXDX6 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing None Experimental 12 None Organic Production Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 13.00 87.00 1.80 98.20 162 112 None None None None None
47 None 22 None None QDZMQ4HS Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada None Observational 17 None Gentamicin Use The use of gentamicin in hatchery Gentamicin use No gentamicin use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 100.00 None 69.00 None 1 49 None None None None None
16 None 14 None None 8VLRXDX6 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing None Experimental 12 None Organic Production Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Combinations of pencillins and/or beta-lactamase inhibitors amoxicillin and enzyme inhibitor None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 20.40 79.60 4.50 95.50 162 112 None None None None None
17 None 14 None None 8VLRXDX6 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing None Experimental 12 None Organic Production Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 19.10 80.90 3.60 96.30 162 112 None None None None None
18 None 14 None None 8VLRXDX6 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing None Experimental 12 None Organic Production Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 19.10 80.90 4.50 95.50 162 112 None None None None None
19 None 14 None None 8VLRXDX6 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing None Experimental 12 None Organic Production Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 15.40 84.60 2.70 97.30 162 112 None None None None None
27 None 14 None None 8VLRXDX6 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing None Experimental 12 None Organic Production Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 6.80 93.20 0.00 100.00 162 112 None None None None None
71 None 31 None None 10.1111/lam.13581 T8YBAST5 Comparative occurrence of ESBL/AmpC beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Salmonella in contract farm and backyard broilers None Observational 35 None Production Type Backyard (household) vs. Contract chickens (farms) Backyard Contract Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None None None ESBL - Genomic AST Salmonella None None None None 3 None 8 None None None None None 27 13 None None None None None
72 None 34 None None 10.14202/VETWORLD.2020.2395-2400 AXSLEU96 Circulation of oxytetracycline- And ciprofloxacin-resistant commensal Escherichia coli strains in broiler chickens and farm environments, Bangladesh; Biometra [Germany] None Observational 36 None Use of antibiotics Litter used Litter used for aquaculture Crop agriculture Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None None None None None None None 0.29 0.02 3.67 0.342 None
73 None 40 None None 10.3390/microorganisms10102044 2YD6VP98 Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles and Resistance Mechanisms to beta-Lactams and Polymyxins of Escherichia coli from Broilers Raised under Intensive and Extensive Production Systems None Observational 37 None Production System Extensive system vs. intensive system Intensive system Extensive system Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 69.00 None 64.70 None 71 68 None None None None None
74 None 40 None None 10.3390/microorganisms10102044 2YD6VP98 Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles and Resistance Mechanisms to beta-Lactams and Polymyxins of Escherichia coli from Broilers Raised under Intensive and Extensive Production Systems None Observational 37 None Production System Extensive system vs. intensive system Intensive system Extensive system Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 1.40 None 5.90 None 71 68 None None None None None
75 None 40 None None 10.3390/microorganisms10102044 2YD6VP98 Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles and Resistance Mechanisms to beta-Lactams and Polymyxins of Escherichia coli from Broilers Raised under Intensive and Extensive Production Systems None Observational 37 None Production System Extensive system vs. intensive system Intensive system Extensive system Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftazidime None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 1.40 None 5.90 None 71 68 None None None None None
76 None 40 None None 10.3390/microorganisms10102044 2YD6VP98 Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles and Resistance Mechanisms to beta-Lactams and Polymyxins of Escherichia coli from Broilers Raised under Intensive and Extensive Production Systems None Observational 37 None Production System Extensive system vs. intensive system Intensive system Extensive system Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 71 68 None None None None None
77 None 40 None None 10.3390/microorganisms10102044 2YD6VP98 Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles and Resistance Mechanisms to beta-Lactams and Polymyxins of Escherichia coli from Broilers Raised under Intensive and Extensive Production Systems None Observational 37 None Production System Extensive system vs. intensive system Intensive system Extensive system Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Carbapenems meropenem None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 71 68 None None None None None
78 None 40 None None 10.3390/microorganisms10102044 2YD6VP98 Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles and Resistance Mechanisms to beta-Lactams and Polymyxins of Escherichia coli from Broilers Raised under Intensive and Extensive Production Systems None Observational 37 None Production System Extensive system vs. intensive system Intensive system Extensive system Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Carbapenems ertapenem None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 71 68 None None None None None
79 None 40 None None 10.3390/microorganisms10102044 2YD6VP98 Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles and Resistance Mechanisms to beta-Lactams and Polymyxins of Escherichia coli from Broilers Raised under Intensive and Extensive Production Systems None Observational 37 None Production System Extensive system vs. intensive system Intensive system Extensive system Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Carbapenems ertapenem None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 71 68 None None None None None
80 None 40 None None 10.3390/microorganisms10102044 2YD6VP98 Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles and Resistance Mechanisms to beta-Lactams and Polymyxins of Escherichia coli from Broilers Raised under Intensive and Extensive Production Systems None Observational 37 None Production System Extensive system vs. intensive system Intensive system Extensive system Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 85.90 None 69.10 None 71 68 None None None None None
81 None 40 None None 10.3390/microorganisms10102044 2YD6VP98 Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles and Resistance Mechanisms to beta-Lactams and Polymyxins of Escherichia coli from Broilers Raised under Intensive and Extensive Production Systems None Observational 37 None Production System Extensive system vs. intensive system Intensive system Extensive system Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 81.70 None 73.50 None 71 68 None None None None None
82 None 40 None None 10.3390/microorganisms10102044 2YD6VP98 Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles and Resistance Mechanisms to beta-Lactams and Polymyxins of Escherichia coli from Broilers Raised under Intensive and Extensive Production Systems None Observational 37 None Production System Extensive system vs. intensive system Intensive system Extensive system Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides azithromycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 11.30 None 73.50 None 71 68 None None None None None
83 None 40 None None 10.3390/microorganisms10102044 2YD6VP98 Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles and Resistance Mechanisms to beta-Lactams and Polymyxins of Escherichia coli from Broilers Raised under Intensive and Extensive Production Systems None Observational 37 None Production System Extensive system vs. intensive system Intensive system Extensive system Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 23.90 None 4.40 None 71 68 None None None None None
84 None 40 None None 10.3390/microorganisms10102044 2YD6VP98 Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles and Resistance Mechanisms to beta-Lactams and Polymyxins of Escherichia coli from Broilers Raised under Intensive and Extensive Production Systems None Observational 37 None Production System Extensive system vs. intensive system Intensive system Extensive system Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Polymyxins colistin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 71 68 None None None None None
85 None 40 None None 10.3390/microorganisms10102044 2YD6VP98 Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles and Resistance Mechanisms to beta-Lactams and Polymyxins of Escherichia coli from Broilers Raised under Intensive and Extensive Production Systems None Observational 37 None Production System Extensive system vs. intensive system Intensive system Extensive system Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 56.30 None 50.00 None 71 68 None None None None None
86 None 40 None None 10.3390/microorganisms10102044 2YD6VP98 Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles and Resistance Mechanisms to beta-Lactams and Polymyxins of Escherichia coli from Broilers Raised under Intensive and Extensive Production Systems None Observational 37 None Production System Extensive system vs. intensive system Intensive system Extensive system Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 50.70 None 36.80 None 71 68 None None None None None
87 None 40 None None 10.3390/microorganisms10102044 2YD6VP98 Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles and Resistance Mechanisms to beta-Lactams and Polymyxins of Escherichia coli from Broilers Raised under Intensive and Extensive Production Systems None Observational 37 None Production System Extensive system vs. intensive system Intensive system Extensive system Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 46.50 None 27.90 None 71 68 None None None None None
89 None 40 None None 10.3390/microorganisms10102044 2YD6VP98 Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles and Resistance Mechanisms to beta-Lactams and Polymyxins of Escherichia coli from Broilers Raised under Intensive and Extensive Production Systems None Observational 37 None Production System Extensive system vs. intensive system Intensive system Extensive system Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tigecycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 71 68 None None None None None
90 None 41 None None 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 EPAWYU5N Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level None Observational 38 None Production Types Extensive vs. Organic Organic Production Extensive Indoor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 77.80 None 74.80 None 43 41 None None None None None
91 None 41 None None 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 EPAWYU5N Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level None Observational 38 None Production Types Extensive vs. Organic Organic Production Extensive Indoor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 43.00 None 56.70 None 43 41 None None None None None
93 None 41 None None 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 EPAWYU5N Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level None Observational 38 None Production Types Extensive vs. Organic Organic Production Extensive Indoor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones norfloxacin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 91.30 None 74.00 None 43 41 None None None None None
13 None 13 None None 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.06.005 YTD23YDM Antimicrobial resistance in E. coli isolates from conventionally and organically reared poultry: A comparison of agar disc diffusion and Sensi Test Gram-negative methods None Observational 11 None Organic Production Organic chicken Conventionally raised chicken Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 30 30 None None None None None
28 None 15 None None 10.3382/ps/pey486 JZL5LDZ9 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing None Observational 13 None Organic Production Organic Production Conventional Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides azithromycin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 1.50 98.50 3.40 96.60 136 176 None None None None None
29 None 15 None None 10.3382/ps/pey486 JZL5LDZ9 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing None Observational 13 None Organic Production Organic Production Conventional Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 3.70 96.30 8.00 92.00 136 176 None None None None None
30 None 15 None None 10.3382/ps/pey486 JZL5LDZ9 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing None Observational 13 None Organic Production Organic Production Conventional Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Lincosamides clindamycin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 5.90 94.10 7.40 92.60 136 176 None None None None None
31 None 15 None None 10.3382/ps/pey486 JZL5LDZ9 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing None Observational 13 None Organic Production Organic Production Conventional Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 1.50 98.50 2.80 97.20 136 176 None None None None None
32 None 15 None None 10.3382/ps/pey486 JZL5LDZ9 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing None Observational 13 None Organic Production Organic Production Conventional Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols florfenicol None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 1.50 98.50 1.70 98.30 136 176 None None None None None
33 None 15 None None 10.3382/ps/pey486 JZL5LDZ9 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing None Observational 13 None Organic Production Organic Production Conventional Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 1.50 98.50 0.00 100.00 136 176 None None None None None
43 None 21 None None 10.1089/fpd.2019.2680 BZTEGWYP Escherichia coli from Commercial Broiler and Backyard Chickens Share Sequence Types, Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles, and Resistance Genes with Human Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli None Observational 15 None Production Type Backyard Chickens Broiler Chickens Chicken Broilers None None None Abattoir Contingency Table None None None CTX-M-15 Escherichia coli None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 9 34 None None None None None
54 None 23 None None 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.09.014 7MRI8RNF Potential transmission opportunity of CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli on a large-scale chicken farm in Vietnam None Observational 23 None Production Type Farm chickens vs. community chickens Community chickens Farm chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 80.40 None 95.50 None 5 27 None None None None None
53 None 23 None None 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.09.014 7MRI8RNF Potential transmission opportunity of CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli on a large-scale chicken farm in Vietnam None Observational 23 None Production Type Farm chickens vs. community chickens Community chickens Farm chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 5 27 None None None None None
56 None 23 None None 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.09.014 7MRI8RNF Potential transmission opportunity of CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli on a large-scale chicken farm in Vietnam None Observational 23 None Production Type Farm chickens vs. community chickens Community chickens Farm chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 60.20 None 84.60 None 5 27 None None None None None
55 None 23 None None 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.09.014 7MRI8RNF Potential transmission opportunity of CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli on a large-scale chicken farm in Vietnam None Observational 23 None Production Type Farm chickens vs. community chickens Community chickens Farm chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 60.20 None 84.60 None 5 27 None None None None None
48 None 22 None None QDZMQ4HS Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada None Observational 18 None Tetracycline Use Tetracycline use as feed additive or treatment Tetracycline Use No tetracycline use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 100.00 None 98.00 None 1 49 None None None None None
49 None 22 None None QDZMQ4HS Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada None Observational 19 None Bacitracin Use Bacitracin use as a feed additive Bacitracin Use No bacitracin Use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Other antibacterials bacitracin None Enterococcus spp. None None None None None None None 100.00 None 97.00 None 19 32 None None None None None
46 None 22 None None QDZMQ4HS Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada None Observational 16 None Ceftiofur Use The use of ceftiofur in hatchery Use of ceftiofur No use of ceftiofur Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 43 7 None None None None None
52 None 22 None None QDZMQ4HS Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada None Observational 22 None Tylosine Use Tylosin use as a feed additive Tylosin Use No tylosine use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus spp. None None None None None None None 100.00 None 93.00 None 11 40 None None None None None
51 None 22 None None QDZMQ4HS Drug use and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Enterococcus spp. isolates from chicken and turkey flocks slaughtered in Quebec, Canada None Observational 21 None Virginiamycin Use Virginiamycin use as feed additive Virginiamycin Use No virginiamycin use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Streptogramins virginiamycin None Enterococcus spp. None None None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 23 21 None None None None None
57 None 29 None None JF6FZN9S Investigation of multi-drug resistant microbes in retail meats None Observational 25 None Production Type Natural vs. conventional raised broiler chicken Natural Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 3 9 None None None None None
94 None 41 None None 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 EPAWYU5N Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level None Observational 38 None Production Types Extensive vs. Organic Organic Production Extensive Indoor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ofloxacin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 90.50 None 58.30 None 43 41 None None None None None
95 None 41 None None 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 EPAWYU5N Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level None Observational 38 None Production Types Extensive vs. Organic Organic Production Extensive Indoor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 97.30 None 87.70 None 43 41 None None None None None
96 None 41 None None 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 EPAWYU5N Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level None Observational 38 None Production Types Extensive vs. Organic Organic Production Extensive Indoor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 26.80 None 16.20 None 43 41 None None None None None
92 None 41 None None 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 EPAWYU5N Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level None Observational 38 None Production Types Extensive vs. Organic Organic Production Extensive Indoor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 96.50 None 77.40 None 43 41 None None None None None
97 None 41 None None 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 EPAWYU5N Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level None Observational 38 None Production Types Extensive vs. Organic Organic Production Extensive Indoor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 73.60 None 40.80 None 43 41 None None None None None
98 None 41 None None 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 EPAWYU5N Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level None Observational 38 None Production Types Extensive vs. Organic Organic Production Extensive Indoor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 26.40 None 48.00 None 43 41 None None None None None
99 None 41 None None 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 EPAWYU5N Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level None Observational 38 None Production Types Extensive vs. Organic Organic Production Extensive Indoor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 47.00 None 7.10 None 43 41 None None None None None
100 None 41 None None 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 EPAWYU5N Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level None Observational 38 None Production Types Extensive vs. Organic Organic Production Extensive Indoor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 13.20 None 44.20 None 43 41 None None None None None
101 None 41 None None 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 EPAWYU5N Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level None Observational 39 None Production Types Intensive vs extensive indoor Intensive Extensive indoor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 72.90 None 74.80 None 83 41 None None None None None
102 None 41 None None 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 EPAWYU5N Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level None Observational 39 None Production Types Intensive vs extensive indoor Intensive Extensive indoor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 2.70 None 56.70 None 83 41 None None None None None
103 None 41 None None 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 EPAWYU5N Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level None Observational 39 None Production Types Intensive vs extensive indoor Intensive Extensive indoor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 96.40 None 77.40 None 83 41 None None None None None
104 None 41 None None 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 EPAWYU5N Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level None Observational 39 None Production Types Intensive vs extensive indoor Intensive Extensive indoor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones norfloxacin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 95.90 None 74.00 None 83 41 None None None None None
105 None 41 None None 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 EPAWYU5N Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level None Observational 39 None Production Types Intensive vs extensive indoor Intensive Extensive indoor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ofloxacin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 95.40 None 58.30 None 83 41 None None None None None
106 None 41 None None 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 EPAWYU5N Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level None Observational 39 None Production Types Intensive vs extensive indoor Intensive Extensive indoor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 97.90 None 87.70 None 83 41 None None None None None
107 None 41 None None 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 EPAWYU5N Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level None Observational 39 None Production Types Intensive vs extensive indoor Intensive Extensive indoor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 25.60 None 16.20 None 83 41 None None None None None
108 None 41 None None 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 EPAWYU5N Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level None Observational 39 None Production Types Intensive vs extensive indoor Intensive Extensive indoor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 82.90 None 40.80 None 83 41 None None None None None
109 None 41 None None 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 EPAWYU5N Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level None Observational 39 None Production Types Intensive vs extensive indoor Intensive Extensive indoor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 48.60 None 48.00 None 83 41 None None None None None
110 None 41 None None 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 EPAWYU5N Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level None Observational 39 None Production Types Intensive vs extensive indoor Intensive Extensive indoor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 0.80 None 7.10 None 83 41 None None None None None
111 None 41 None None 10.3382/ps.2013-03729 EPAWYU5N Antimicrobial resistance among Campylobacter spp. strains isolated from different poultry production systems at slaughterhouse level None Observational 39 None Production Types Intensive vs extensive indoor Intensive Extensive indoor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 0.80 None 44.20 None 83 41 None None None None None
114 None 42 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101282 M7SQ9ZHI Comparison of antimicrobial resistances in Escherichia coli from conventionally and organic farmed poultry from Germany None Observational 40 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional production type Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 7.60 None 31 301 None None None None None
115 None 42 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101282 M7SQ9ZHI Comparison of antimicrobial resistances in Escherichia coli from conventionally and organic farmed poultry from Germany None Observational 40 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional production type Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 1.70 None 31 301 None None None None None
116 None 42 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101282 M7SQ9ZHI Comparison of antimicrobial resistances in Escherichia coli from conventionally and organic farmed poultry from Germany None Observational 40 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional production type Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftazidime None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 1.70 None 31 301 None None None None None
113 None 42 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101282 M7SQ9ZHI Comparison of antimicrobial resistances in Escherichia coli from conventionally and organic farmed poultry from Germany None Observational 40 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional production type Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 3.20 None 1.30 None 31 301 None None None None None
117 None 42 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101282 M7SQ9ZHI Comparison of antimicrobial resistances in Escherichia coli from conventionally and organic farmed poultry from Germany None Observational 40 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional production type Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 9.70 None 41.50 None 31 301 None None None None None
118 None 42 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101282 M7SQ9ZHI Comparison of antimicrobial resistances in Escherichia coli from conventionally and organic farmed poultry from Germany None Observational 40 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional production type Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 9.70 None 44.50 None 31 301 None None None None None
119 None 42 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101282 M7SQ9ZHI Comparison of antimicrobial resistances in Escherichia coli from conventionally and organic farmed poultry from Germany None Observational 40 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional production type Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 22.60 None 70.40 None 31 301 None None None None None
120 None 42 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101282 M7SQ9ZHI Comparison of antimicrobial resistances in Escherichia coli from conventionally and organic farmed poultry from Germany None Observational 40 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional production type Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Polymyxins colistin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 8.30 None 31 301 None None None None None
121 None 42 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101282 M7SQ9ZHI Comparison of antimicrobial resistances in Escherichia coli from conventionally and organic farmed poultry from Germany None Observational 40 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional production type Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 9.70 None 59.10 None 31 301 None None None None None
122 None 42 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101282 M7SQ9ZHI Comparison of antimicrobial resistances in Escherichia coli from conventionally and organic farmed poultry from Germany None Observational 40 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional production type Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 6.50 None 52.50 None 31 301 None None None None None
123 None 42 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101282 M7SQ9ZHI Comparison of antimicrobial resistances in Escherichia coli from conventionally and organic farmed poultry from Germany None Observational 40 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional production type Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 9.70 None 40.20 None 31 301 None None None None None
124 None 42 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101282 M7SQ9ZHI Comparison of antimicrobial resistances in Escherichia coli from conventionally and organic farmed poultry from Germany None Observational 40 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional production type Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides azithromycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 1.70 None 31 301 None None None None None
125 None 42 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101282 M7SQ9ZHI Comparison of antimicrobial resistances in Escherichia coli from conventionally and organic farmed poultry from Germany None Observational 40 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional production type Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Carbapenems meropenem None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 31 301 None None None None None
126 None 42 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101282 M7SQ9ZHI Comparison of antimicrobial resistances in Escherichia coli from conventionally and organic farmed poultry from Germany None Observational 40 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional production type Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tigecycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 31 301 None None None None None
127 None 45 None None 10.3390/pathogens10121630 MTMLXTAM Differences in genotype and antimicrobial resistance between Campylobacter spp. Isolated from organic and conventionally produced chickens in Sweden None Observational 41 None Production Types Organic and conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None None None None None 0.00 None 22.50 None 52 71 None None None None None
128 None 45 None None 10.3390/pathogens10121630 MTMLXTAM Differences in genotype and antimicrobial resistance between Campylobacter spp. Isolated from organic and conventionally produced chickens in Sweden None Observational 41 None Production Types Organic and conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 52 71 None None None None None
129 None 45 None None 10.3390/pathogens10121630 MTMLXTAM Differences in genotype and antimicrobial resistance between Campylobacter spp. Isolated from organic and conventionally produced chickens in Sweden None Observational 41 None Production Types Organic and conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter jejuni None None None None None None None 0.00 None 22.50 None 52 71 None None None None None
130 None 45 None None 10.3390/pathogens10121630 MTMLXTAM Differences in genotype and antimicrobial resistance between Campylobacter spp. Isolated from organic and conventionally produced chickens in Sweden None Observational 41 None Production Types Organic and conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 52 71 None None None None None
131 None 45 None None 10.3390/pathogens10121630 MTMLXTAM Differences in genotype and antimicrobial resistance between Campylobacter spp. Isolated from organic and conventionally produced chickens in Sweden None Observational 41 None Production Types Organic and conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 52 71 None None None None None
132 None 45 None None 10.3390/pathogens10121630 MTMLXTAM Differences in genotype and antimicrobial resistance between Campylobacter spp. Isolated from organic and conventionally produced chickens in Sweden None Observational 41 None Production Types Organic and conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter jejuni None None None None None None None 3.80 None 5.60 None 52 71 None None None None None
133 None 45 None None 10.3390/pathogens10121630 MTMLXTAM Differences in genotype and antimicrobial resistance between Campylobacter spp. Isolated from organic and conventionally produced chickens in Sweden None Observational 41 None Production Types Organic and conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 11.10 None 25 9 None None None None None
134 None 45 None None 10.3390/pathogens10121630 MTMLXTAM Differences in genotype and antimicrobial resistance between Campylobacter spp. Isolated from organic and conventionally produced chickens in Sweden None Observational 41 None Production Types Organic and conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 25 9 None None None None None
135 None 45 None None 10.3390/pathogens10121630 MTMLXTAM Differences in genotype and antimicrobial resistance between Campylobacter spp. Isolated from organic and conventionally produced chickens in Sweden None Observational 41 None Production Types Organic and conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 25 9 None None None None None
136 None 45 None None 10.3390/pathogens10121630 MTMLXTAM Differences in genotype and antimicrobial resistance between Campylobacter spp. Isolated from organic and conventionally produced chickens in Sweden None Observational 41 None Production Types Organic and conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 11.10 None 25 9 None None None None None
137 None 45 None None 10.3390/pathogens10121630 MTMLXTAM Differences in genotype and antimicrobial resistance between Campylobacter spp. Isolated from organic and conventionally produced chickens in Sweden None Observational 41 None Production Types Organic and conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Campylobacter coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 11.10 None 25 9 None None None None None
138 None 45 None None 10.3390/pathogens10121630 MTMLXTAM Differences in genotype and antimicrobial resistance between Campylobacter spp. Isolated from organic and conventionally produced chickens in Sweden None Observational 41 None Production Types Organic and conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 25 9 None None None None None
139 None 49 None None 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02120 HFV3U99Z Risk of transmission of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli from commercial broiler and free-range retail chicken in India None Observational 43 None Production Type Conventional vs. free-range chicken Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 93.00 None 92.00 None 13 54 None None None None None
141 None 49 None None 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02120 HFV3U99Z Risk of transmission of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli from commercial broiler and free-range retail chicken in India None Observational 43 None Production Type Conventional vs. free-range chicken Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Imidazole derivatives clotrimazole None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 8.00 None 61.00 None 13 54 None None None None None
142 None 49 None None 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02120 HFV3U99Z Risk of transmission of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli from commercial broiler and free-range retail chicken in India None Observational 43 None Production Type Conventional vs. free-range chicken Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 8.00 None 43.00 None 13 54 None None None None None
143 None 49 None None 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02120 HFV3U99Z Risk of transmission of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli from commercial broiler and free-range retail chicken in India None Observational 43 None Production Type Conventional vs. free-range chicken Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 9.00 None 13 54 None None None None None
140 None 49 None None 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02120 HFV3U99Z Risk of transmission of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli from commercial broiler and free-range retail chicken in India None Observational 43 None Production Type Conventional vs. free-range chicken Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 15.00 None 96.00 None 13 54 None None None None None
144 None 49 None None 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02120 HFV3U99Z Risk of transmission of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli from commercial broiler and free-range retail chicken in India None Observational 43 None Production Type Conventional vs. free-range chicken Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 6.00 None 13 54 None None None None None
145 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 44 None Market Type Independent vs. Supermarket Independent Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 7.10 None 0.00 None 28 11 None None None None None
146 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 44 None Market Type Independent vs. Supermarket Independent Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 10.70 None 9.10 None 28 11 None None None None None
147 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 44 None Market Type Independent vs. Supermarket Independent Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 14.30 None 27.30 None 28 11 None None None None None
148 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 44 None Market Type Independent vs. Supermarket Independent Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 28 11 None None None None None
149 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 44 None Market Type Independent vs. Supermarket Independent Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 3.60 None 9.10 None 28 11 None None None None None
150 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 44 None Market Type Independent vs. Supermarket Independent Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones enrofloxacin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 64.30 None 81.80 None 28 11 None None None None None
151 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 44 None Market Type Independent vs. Supermarket Independent Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 0.00 None 9.10 None 28 11 None None None None None
153 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 44 None Market Type Independent vs. Supermarket Independent Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 32.10 None 36.40 None 28 11 None None None None None
154 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 44 None Market Type Independent vs. Supermarket Independent Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 35.70 None 18.20 None 28 11 None None None None None
155 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 44 None Market Type Independent vs. Supermarket Independent Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 42.90 None 81.80 None 28 11 None None None None None
156 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 45 None Market Type Municipal Market vs. supermarket Municipal Market Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 9.40 None 0.00 None 64 11 None None None None None
157 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 45 None Market Type Municipal Market vs. supermarket Municipal Market Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 10.90 None 9.10 None 64 11 None None None None None
158 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 45 None Market Type Municipal Market vs. supermarket Municipal Market Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 20.30 None 27.30 None 64 11 None None None None None
159 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 45 None Market Type Municipal Market vs. supermarket Municipal Market Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 1.60 None 0.00 None 64 11 None None None None None
160 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 45 None Market Type Municipal Market vs. supermarket Municipal Market Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 4.70 None 9.10 None 64 11 None None None None None
161 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 45 None Market Type Municipal Market vs. supermarket Municipal Market Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones enrofloxacin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 42.20 None 81.80 None 64 11 None None None None None
162 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 45 None Market Type Municipal Market vs. supermarket Municipal Market Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 0.00 None 9.10 None 64 11 None None None None None
163 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 45 None Market Type Municipal Market vs. supermarket Municipal Market Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 37.50 None 36.40 None 64 11 None None None None None
164 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 45 None Market Type Municipal Market vs. supermarket Municipal Market Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 46.90 None 18.20 None 64 11 None None None None None
165 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 45 None Market Type Municipal Market vs. supermarket Municipal Market Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 28.10 None 81.80 None 64 11 None None None None None
166 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 46 None Market Storage Condition Refrigerate vs. ambient temp Ambient temperature Refrigerated Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 9.80 None 0.00 None 82 21 None None None None None
167 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 46 None Market Storage Condition Refrigerate vs. ambient temp Ambient temperature Refrigerated Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 11.00 None 9.50 None 82 21 None None None None None
168 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 46 None Market Storage Condition Refrigerate vs. ambient temp Ambient temperature Refrigerated Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 19.50 None 19.00 None 82 21 None None None None None
169 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 46 None Market Storage Condition Refrigerate vs. ambient temp Ambient temperature Refrigerated Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 1.20 None 0.00 None 82 21 None None None None None
171 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 46 None Market Storage Condition Refrigerate vs. ambient temp Ambient temperature Refrigerated Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones enrofloxacin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 48.80 None 66.70 None 82 21 None None None None None
172 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 46 None Market Storage Condition Refrigerate vs. ambient temp Ambient temperature Refrigerated Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 0.00 None 4.80 None 82 21 None None None None None
173 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 46 None Market Storage Condition Refrigerate vs. ambient temp Ambient temperature Refrigerated Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 36.60 None 33.30 None 82 21 None None None None None
174 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 46 None Market Storage Condition Refrigerate vs. ambient temp Ambient temperature Refrigerated Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 42.70 None 33.30 None 82 21 None None None None None
175 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 46 None Market Storage Condition Refrigerate vs. ambient temp Ambient temperature Refrigerated Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 30.50 None 66.70 None 82 21 None None None None None
170 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 46 None Market Storage Condition Refrigerate vs. ambient temp Ambient temperature Refrigerated Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 2.40 None 9.50 None 82 21 None None None None None
176 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 47 None Chicken production system Integrated vs. non-integrated system Non-integrated Integrated Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 10.50 None 0.00 None 76 27 None None None None None
177 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 47 None Chicken production system Integrated vs. non-integrated system Non-integrated Integrated Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 11.80 None 7.40 None 76 27 None None None None None
178 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 47 None Chicken production system Integrated vs. non-integrated system Non-integrated Integrated Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 19.70 None 18.50 None 76 27 None None None None None
179 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 47 None Chicken production system Integrated vs. non-integrated system Non-integrated Integrated Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 1.30 None 0.00 None 76 27 None None None None None
180 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 47 None Chicken production system Integrated vs. non-integrated system Non-integrated Integrated Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 2.60 None 7.40 None 76 27 None None None None None
181 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 47 None Chicken production system Integrated vs. non-integrated system Non-integrated Integrated Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones enrofloxacin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 47.40 None 66.70 None 76 27 None None None None None
182 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 47 None Chicken production system Integrated vs. non-integrated system Non-integrated Integrated Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 0.00 None 3.70 None 76 27 None None None None None
183 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 47 None Chicken production system Integrated vs. non-integrated system Non-integrated Integrated Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 38.20 None 29.60 None 76 27 None None None None None
184 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 47 None Chicken production system Integrated vs. non-integrated system Non-integrated Integrated Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 43.40 None 33.30 None 76 27 None None None None None
185 None 51 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-117 85B597TB Salmonella on Raw Poultry in Retail Markets in Guatemala: Levels, Antibiotic Susceptibility, and Serovar Distribution None Observational 47 None Chicken production system Integrated vs. non-integrated system Non-integrated Integrated Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 28.90 None 63.00 None 76 27 None None None None None
186 None 53 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-223 Y43L579V Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella Isolates Recovered from Chickens Sold at Retail Outlets in Trinidad None Observational 48 None Retail type Cottage processors vs. supermarkets (based on whole chicken in table 2) Cottage Processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 52 8 None None None None None
187 None 53 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-223 Y43L579V Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella Isolates Recovered from Chickens Sold at Retail Outlets in Trinidad None Observational 48 None Retail type Cottage processors vs. supermarkets (based on whole chicken in table 2) Cottage Processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines doxycycline None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 52 8 None None None None None
189 None 53 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-223 Y43L579V Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella Isolates Recovered from Chickens Sold at Retail Outlets in Trinidad None Observational 48 None Retail type Cottage processors vs. supermarkets (based on whole chicken in table 2) Cottage Processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 86.50 None 100.00 None 45 8 None None None None None
190 None 53 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-223 Y43L579V Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella Isolates Recovered from Chickens Sold at Retail Outlets in Trinidad None Observational 48 None Retail type Cottage processors vs. supermarkets (based on whole chicken in table 2) Cottage Processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 84.20 None 87.50 None 52 8 None None None None None
191 None 53 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-223 Y43L579V Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella Isolates Recovered from Chickens Sold at Retail Outlets in Trinidad None Observational 48 None Retail type Cottage processors vs. supermarkets (based on whole chicken in table 2) Cottage Processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 57.70 None 12.50 None 30 8 None None None None None
192 None 53 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-223 Y43L579V Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella Isolates Recovered from Chickens Sold at Retail Outlets in Trinidad None Observational 48 None Retail type Cottage processors vs. supermarkets (based on whole chicken in table 2) Cottage Processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 15.30 None 0.00 None 52 8 None None None None None
193 None 53 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-223 Y43L579V Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella Isolates Recovered from Chickens Sold at Retail Outlets in Trinidad None Observational 48 None Retail type Cottage processors vs. supermarkets (based on whole chicken in table 2) Cottage Processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 25.00 None 0.00 None 52 8 None None None None None
194 None 53 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-223 Y43L579V Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella Isolates Recovered from Chickens Sold at Retail Outlets in Trinidad None Observational 48 None Retail type Cottage processors vs. supermarkets (based on whole chicken in table 2) Cottage Processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Quinolones enrofloxacin None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 9.60 None 0.00 None 52 8 None None None None None
195 None 53 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-223 Y43L579V Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella Isolates Recovered from Chickens Sold at Retail Outlets in Trinidad None Observational 48 None Retail type Cottage processors vs. supermarkets (based on whole chicken in table 2) Cottage Processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 1.90 None 0.00 None 52 8 None None None None None
196 None 53 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-223 Y43L579V Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella Isolates Recovered from Chickens Sold at Retail Outlets in Trinidad None Observational 48 None Retail type Cottage processors vs. supermarkets (based on whole chicken in table 2) Cottage Processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 52 8 None None None None None
197 None 53 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-223 Y43L579V Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella Isolates Recovered from Chickens Sold at Retail Outlets in Trinidad None Observational 48 None Retail type Cottage processors vs. supermarkets (based on whole chicken in table 2) Cottage Processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 52 8 None None None None None
198 None 54 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 B9CMZS46 Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken None Observational 49 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Production Conventional Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides amikacin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 17.10 None 23.20 None 76 56 None None None None None
199 None 54 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 B9CMZS46 Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken None Observational 49 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Production Conventional Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 5.30 None 17.90 None 76 56 None None None None None
200 None 54 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 B9CMZS46 Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken None Observational 49 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Production Conventional Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 7.90 None 23.20 None 76 56 None None None None None
201 None 54 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 B9CMZS46 Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken None Observational 49 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Production Conventional Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides azithromycin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 7.90 None 5.40 None 76 56 None None None None None
202 None 54 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 B9CMZS46 Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken None Observational 49 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Production Conventional Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefaclor None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 5.30 None 0.00 None 76 56 None None None None None
203 None 54 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 B9CMZS46 Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken None Observational 49 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Production Conventional Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 3.90 None 12.50 None 76 56 None None None None None
204 None 54 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 B9CMZS46 Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken None Observational 49 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Production Conventional Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 5.30 None 0.00 None 76 56 None None None None None
205 None 54 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 B9CMZS46 Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken None Observational 49 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Production Conventional Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 56.60 None 71.40 None 76 56 None None None None None
206 None 54 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 B9CMZS46 Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken None Observational 49 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Production Conventional Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 40.80 None 55.40 None 76 56 None None None None None
207 None 54 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 B9CMZS46 Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken None Observational 49 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Production Conventional Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Combinations of antibacterials penicillins, combinations with other antibacterials None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 43.30 None 64.30 None 76 56 None None None None None
208 None 54 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 B9CMZS46 Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken None Observational 49 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Production Conventional Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 71.10 None 40.80 None 76 56 None None None None None
209 None 54 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 B9CMZS46 Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken None Observational 49 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Production Conventional Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 71.10 None 96.40 None 76 56 None None None None None
210 None 54 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-14-322 B9CMZS46 Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of enterococci isolated from organic and conventional retail chicken None Observational 49 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Production Conventional Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 29.00 None 42.40 None 76 56 None None None None None
211 None 56 None None 10.3382/ps/pex275 JGQL2W7M Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea None Observational 50 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 9.20 None 30.80 None 52 52 None None None None None
212 None 56 None None 10.3382/ps/pex275 JGQL2W7M Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea None Observational 50 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 76.90 None 67.30 None 52 52 None None None None None
213 None 56 None None 10.3382/ps/pex275 JGQL2W7M Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea None Observational 50 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 17.30 None 44.20 None 52 52 None None None None None
214 None 56 None None 10.3382/ps/pex275 JGQL2W7M Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea None Observational 50 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Antibiotics rifampicin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 40.40 None 46.20 None 52 52 None None None None None
216 None 56 None None 10.3382/ps/pex275 JGQL2W7M Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea None Observational 50 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 1.90 None 5.80 None 52 52 None None None None None
217 None 56 None None 10.3382/ps/pex275 JGQL2W7M Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea None Observational 50 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 52 52 None None None None None
219 None 56 None None 10.3382/ps/pex275 JGQL2W7M Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea None Observational 50 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 1.90 None 9.60 None 52 52 None None None None None
220 None 56 None None 10.3382/ps/pex275 JGQL2W7M Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea None Observational 50 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Streptogramins quinupristin and dalfopristin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 34.60 None 32.70 None 52 52 None None None None None
221 None 56 None None 10.3382/ps/pex275 JGQL2W7M Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea None Observational 50 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tigecycline None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 52 52 None None None None None
222 None 56 None None 10.3382/ps/pex275 JGQL2W7M Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea None Observational 50 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Other antibacterials linezolid None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 0.00 None 3.80 None 52 52 None None None None None
225 None 59 None None GE39P9U2 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serovars in conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores None Observational 54 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides amikacin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 33 93 None None None None None
226 None 59 None None GE39P9U2 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serovars in conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores None Observational 54 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 0.00 None 8.60 None 33 93 None None None None None
228 None 59 None None GE39P9U2 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serovars in conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores None Observational 54 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 66.70 None 46.20 None 33 93 None None None None None
229 None 59 None None GE39P9U2 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serovars in conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores None Observational 54 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 21.20 None 19.40 None 33 93 None None None None None
230 None 59 None None GE39P9U2 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serovars in conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores None Observational 54 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 9.10 None 19.40 None 33 93 None None None None None
231 None 59 None None GE39P9U2 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serovars in conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores None Observational 54 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 15.10 None 20.40 None 33 93 None None None None None
232 None 59 None None GE39P9U2 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serovars in conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores None Observational 54 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 33 93 None None None None None
233 None 59 None None GE39P9U2 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serovars in conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores None Observational 54 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 9.10 None 19.40 None 33 93 None None None None None
234 None 59 None None GE39P9U2 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serovars in conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores None Observational 54 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 9.10 None 0.00 None 33 93 None None None None None
235 None 59 None None GE39P9U2 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serovars in conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores None Observational 54 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 0.00 None 4.30 None 33 93 None None None None None
236 None 59 None None GE39P9U2 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serovars in conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores None Observational 54 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 33 93 None None None None None
237 None 59 None None GE39P9U2 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serovars in conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores None Observational 54 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 3.00 None 0.00 None 33 93 None None None None None
238 None 59 None None GE39P9U2 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serovars in conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores None Observational 54 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 63.60 None 41.90 None 33 93 None None None None None
242 None 61 None None 10.2478/jvetres-2020-0060 ITMW2WNL Colistin resistance of non-pathogenic strains of Escherichia coli occurring as natural intestinal flora in broiler chickens treated and not treated with colistin sulphate None Observational 56 None AMU a- flocks not treated with colistin sulphate e; b – flocks treated with colistin sulphate Not treated with colistin sulphate Treated with colistin sulphate Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Polymyxins colistin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 11.27 None 19.54 None 71 87 None None None None None
243 None 64 None None 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 XX4BFSXG Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets None Observational 57 None Market Types organic retailers vs. conventional retailer Organic Retailers Conventional Retailers Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 7.27 None 0.00 None 55 33 None None None None None
244 None 64 None None 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 XX4BFSXG Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets None Observational 57 None Market Types organic retailers vs. conventional retailer Organic Retailers Conventional Retailers Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 5.45 None 48.48 None 55 33 None None None None None
245 None 64 None None 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 XX4BFSXG Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets None Observational 57 None Market Types organic retailers vs. conventional retailer Organic Retailers Conventional Retailers Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 0.00 None 43.64 None 55 33 None None None None None
246 None 64 None None 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 XX4BFSXG Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets None Observational 57 None Market Types organic retailers vs. conventional retailer Organic Retailers Conventional Retailers Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 1.82 None 3.03 None 55 33 None None None None None
247 None 64 None None 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 XX4BFSXG Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets None Observational 57 None Market Types organic retailers vs. conventional retailer Organic Retailers Conventional Retailers Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 76.36 None 100.00 None 53 33 None None None None None
248 None 64 None None 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 XX4BFSXG Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets None Observational 57 None Market Types organic retailers vs. conventional retailer Organic Retailers Conventional Retailers Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 55 33 None None None None None
249 None 64 None None 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 XX4BFSXG Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets None Observational 57 None Market Types organic retailers vs. conventional retailer Organic Retailers Conventional Retailers Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 55 33 None None None None None
250 None 64 None None 10.1111/1462-2920.13265 XX4BFSXG Prevalence and antibiotic resistance pattern of Salmonella serovars in integrated crop-livestock farms and their products sold in local markets None Observational 57 None Market Types organic retailers vs. conventional retailer Organic Retailers Conventional Retailers Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 32.73 None 15.15 None 55 33 None None None None None
251 None 66 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101419 LZPR3QFN Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of Thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. Isolated from Human and Poultry Samples in Georgia (Caucasus); Illumina [United States], Thermo [United States] None Observational 58 None Production Type Backyard chicken vs. industrial chicken Backyard chicken Industrial (conventional) chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter jejuni None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 25 5 None None None None None
252 None 66 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101419 LZPR3QFN Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of Thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. Isolated from Human and Poultry Samples in Georgia (Caucasus); Illumina [United States], Thermo [United States] None Observational 58 None Production Type Backyard chicken vs. industrial chicken Backyard chicken Industrial (conventional) chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None None None None None 80.00 None 100.00 None 25 5 None None None None None
253 None 66 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101419 LZPR3QFN Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of Thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. Isolated from Human and Poultry Samples in Georgia (Caucasus); Illumina [United States], Thermo [United States] None Observational 58 None Production Type Backyard chicken vs. industrial chicken Backyard chicken Industrial (conventional) chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 25 5 None None None None None
254 None 66 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101419 LZPR3QFN Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of Thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. Isolated from Human and Poultry Samples in Georgia (Caucasus); Illumina [United States], Thermo [United States] None Observational 58 None Production Type Backyard chicken vs. industrial chicken Backyard chicken Industrial (conventional) chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Carbapenems ertapenem None Campylobacter jejuni None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 25 25 None None None None None
255 None 66 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101419 LZPR3QFN Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of Thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. Isolated from Human and Poultry Samples in Georgia (Caucasus); Illumina [United States], Thermo [United States] None Observational 58 None Production Type Backyard chicken vs. industrial chicken Backyard chicken Industrial (conventional) chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 25 5 None None None None None
256 None 66 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101419 LZPR3QFN Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of Thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. Isolated from Human and Poultry Samples in Georgia (Caucasus); Illumina [United States], Thermo [United States] None Observational 58 None Production Type Backyard chicken vs. industrial chicken Backyard chicken Industrial (conventional) chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter jejuni None None None None None None None 72.00 None 80.00 None 25 5 None None None None None
257 None 66 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101419 LZPR3QFN Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of Thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. Isolated from Human and Poultry Samples in Georgia (Caucasus); Illumina [United States], Thermo [United States] None Observational 58 None Production Type Backyard chicken vs. industrial chicken Backyard chicken Industrial (conventional) chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 72 45 None None None None None
258 None 66 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101419 LZPR3QFN Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of Thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. Isolated from Human and Poultry Samples in Georgia (Caucasus); Illumina [United States], Thermo [United States] None Observational 58 None Production Type Backyard chicken vs. industrial chicken Backyard chicken Industrial (conventional) chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli None None None None None None None 96.00 None 100.00 None 72 45 None None None None None
224 None 58 None None LXMBIQNI Risk factors for antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter spp. isolated from raw poultry meat in Switzerland None Observational 52 None Production Type Conventional vs, animal friendly Animal-friendly Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 5.40 None 15.00 None 37 50 None None None None None
215 None 56 None None 10.3382/ps/pex275 JGQL2W7M Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea None Observational 50 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 1.90 None 5.80 None 52 52 None None None None None
239 None 60 None None 10.1186/s12917-019-2044-0 I5Z6XGTI Limited association between disinfectant use and either antibiotic or disinfectant susceptibility of Escherichia coli in both poultry and pig husbandry None Observational 55 None Biosecurity Cleaning practices using peracetic acid, hydrogen peroxide Use of peracetic acid, hydrogen peroxide No use of peracetic acid, hydrogen peroxide Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None None None None None None None 0.12 None None .001 None
240 None 60 None None 10.1186/s12917-019-2044-0 I5Z6XGTI Limited association between disinfectant use and either antibiotic or disinfectant susceptibility of Escherichia coli in both poultry and pig husbandry None Observational 55 None Biosecurity Cleaning practices using peracetic acid, hydrogen peroxide Use of peracetic acid, hydrogen peroxide No use of peracetic acid, hydrogen peroxide Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None None None None None None None 0.29 None None 0.002 None
241 None 60 None None 10.1186/s12917-019-2044-0 I5Z6XGTI Limited association between disinfectant use and either antibiotic or disinfectant susceptibility of Escherichia coli in both poultry and pig husbandry None Observational 55 None Biosecurity Cleaning practices using peracetic acid, hydrogen peroxide Use of peracetic acid, hydrogen peroxide No use of peracetic acid, hydrogen peroxide Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None None None None None None None 0.02 None None 0.001 None
227 None 59 None None GE39P9U2 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella serovars in conventional and organic chickens from Louisiana retail stores None Observational 54 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 3.00 None 3.20 None 33 93 None None None None None
188 None 53 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-223 Y43L579V Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella Isolates Recovered from Chickens Sold at Retail Outlets in Trinidad None Observational 48 None Retail type Cottage processors vs. supermarkets (based on whole chicken in table 2) Cottage Processor Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 94.20 None 8.00 None 52 8 None None None None None
218 None 56 None None 10.3382/ps/pex275 JGQL2W7M Comparison of the loads and antibiotic-resistance profiles of Enterococcus species from conventional and organic chicken carcasses in South Korea None Observational 50 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Glycopeptide antibacterials teicoplanin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 52 52 None None None None None
259 None 66 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101419 LZPR3QFN Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of Thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. Isolated from Human and Poultry Samples in Georgia (Caucasus); Illumina [United States], Thermo [United States] None Observational 58 None Production Type Backyard chicken vs. industrial chicken Backyard chicken Industrial (conventional) chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 72 45 None None None None None
260 None 66 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101419 LZPR3QFN Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of Thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. Isolated from Human and Poultry Samples in Georgia (Caucasus); Illumina [United States], Thermo [United States] None Observational 58 None Production Type Backyard chicken vs. industrial chicken Backyard chicken Industrial (conventional) chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Carbapenems ertapenem None Campylobacter coli None None None None None None None 37.00 None 82.00 None 72 45 None None None None None
261 None 66 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101419 LZPR3QFN Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of Thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. Isolated from Human and Poultry Samples in Georgia (Caucasus); Illumina [United States], Thermo [United States] None Observational 58 None Production Type Backyard chicken vs. industrial chicken Backyard chicken Industrial (conventional) chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 72 45 None None None None None
262 None 66 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11101419 LZPR3QFN Comparison of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of Thermotolerant Campylobacter spp. Isolated from Human and Poultry Samples in Georgia (Caucasus); Illumina [United States], Thermo [United States] None Observational 58 None Production Type Backyard chicken vs. industrial chicken Backyard chicken Industrial (conventional) chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli None None None None None None None 72.00 None 100.00 None 72 45 None None None None None
263 None 68 None None 86XMFHE7 Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococcus spp. Strains Isolated from Organic Chicken, Conventional Chicken, and Turkey Meat: A Comparative Survey None Observational 59 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional Organic chickens Conventional chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus spp. None None None None None None None 18.33 None 33.33 None 60 60 None None None None None
265 None 68 None None 86XMFHE7 Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococcus spp. Strains Isolated from Organic Chicken, Conventional Chicken, and Turkey Meat: A Comparative Survey None Observational 59 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional Organic chickens Conventional chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines doxycycline None Enterococcus spp. None None None None None None None 0.00 None 8.33 None 60 60 None None None None None
264 None 68 None None 86XMFHE7 Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococcus spp. Strains Isolated from Organic Chicken, Conventional Chicken, and Turkey Meat: A Comparative Survey None Observational 59 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional Organic chickens Conventional chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus spp. None None None None None None None 1.67 None 5.00 None 60 60 None None None None None
266 None 68 None None 86XMFHE7 Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococcus spp. Strains Isolated from Organic Chicken, Conventional Chicken, and Turkey Meat: A Comparative Survey None Observational 59 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional Organic chickens Conventional chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus spp. None None None None None None None 5.00 None 23.33 None 60 60 None None None None None
267 None 68 None None 86XMFHE7 Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococcus spp. Strains Isolated from Organic Chicken, Conventional Chicken, and Turkey Meat: A Comparative Survey None Observational 59 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional Organic chickens Conventional chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus spp. None None None None None None None 1.67 None 15.00 None 60 60 None None None None None
268 None 68 None None 86XMFHE7 Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococcus spp. Strains Isolated from Organic Chicken, Conventional Chicken, and Turkey Meat: A Comparative Survey None Observational 59 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional Organic chickens Conventional chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus spp. None None None None None None None 5.00 None 11.67 None 60 60 None None None None None
269 None 68 None None 86XMFHE7 Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococcus spp. Strains Isolated from Organic Chicken, Conventional Chicken, and Turkey Meat: A Comparative Survey None Observational 59 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional Organic chickens Conventional chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus spp. None None None None None None None 3.33 None 6.67 None 60 60 None None None None None
270 None 68 None None 86XMFHE7 Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterococcus spp. Strains Isolated from Organic Chicken, Conventional Chicken, and Turkey Meat: A Comparative Survey None Observational 59 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional Organic chickens Conventional chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus spp. None None None None None None None 0.00 None 11.67 None 60 60 None None None None None
271 None 69 None None JUA7GTQR Comparison of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes Strains Isolated from Organic and Conventional Poultry Meat None Observational 61 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional Organic production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 54.90 None 21.90 None 105 115 None None None None None
272 None 69 None None JUA7GTQR Comparison of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes Strains Isolated from Organic and Conventional Poultry Meat None Observational 61 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional Organic production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 2.90 None 5.20 None 105 115 None None None None None
273 None 69 None None JUA7GTQR Comparison of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes Strains Isolated from Organic and Conventional Poultry Meat None Observational 61 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional Organic production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 9.50 None 27.80 None 105 115 None None None None None
274 None 69 None None JUA7GTQR Comparison of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes Strains Isolated from Organic and Conventional Poultry Meat None Observational 61 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional Organic production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines doxycycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 25.70 None 47.80 None 105 115 None None None None None
275 None 69 None None JUA7GTQR Comparison of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes Strains Isolated from Organic and Conventional Poultry Meat None Observational 61 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional Organic production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 2.90 None 0.00 None 105 115 None None None None None
276 None 69 None None JUA7GTQR Comparison of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes Strains Isolated from Organic and Conventional Poultry Meat None Observational 61 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional Organic production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 1.00 None 9.60 None 105 115 None None None None None
277 None 69 None None JUA7GTQR Comparison of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes Strains Isolated from Organic and Conventional Poultry Meat None Observational 61 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional Organic production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 1.90 None 3.50 None 105 115 None None None None None
278 None 69 None None JUA7GTQR Comparison of Antimicrobial Resistance in Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes Strains Isolated from Organic and Conventional Poultry Meat None Observational 61 None Production Type Organic vs. conventional Organic production Conventional production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 23.80 None 46.10 None 105 115 None None None None None
279 None 71 None None 10.1002/vetr.302 H8DADAJ7 Influence of farm management on the dynamics of Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis shedding and antibiotic resistance during the growing period of broiler chickens None Experimental 62 None Production type Commercial (CFC) and optimal farming conditions Optimal farming conditions Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. None None None 12 None 12 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
280 None 71 None None 10.1002/vetr.302 H8DADAJ7 Influence of farm management on the dynamics of Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis shedding and antibiotic resistance during the growing period of broiler chickens None Experimental 62 None Production type Commercial (CFC) and optimal farming conditions Optimal farming conditions Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. None None None 12 None 12 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
281 None 71 None None 10.1002/vetr.302 H8DADAJ7 Influence of farm management on the dynamics of Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis shedding and antibiotic resistance during the growing period of broiler chickens None Experimental 62 None Production type Commercial (CFC) and optimal farming conditions Optimal farming conditions Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Salmonella spp. None None None 4 None 3 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
283 None 71 None None 10.1002/vetr.302 H8DADAJ7 Influence of farm management on the dynamics of Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis shedding and antibiotic resistance during the growing period of broiler chickens None Experimental 62 None Production type Commercial (CFC) and optimal farming conditions Optimal farming conditions Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. None None None 2 None 0 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
285 None 71 None None 10.1002/vetr.302 H8DADAJ7 Influence of farm management on the dynamics of Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis shedding and antibiotic resistance during the growing period of broiler chickens None Experimental 62 None Production type Commercial (CFC) and optimal farming conditions Optimal farming conditions Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. None None None 12 None 11 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
286 None 71 None None 10.1002/vetr.302 H8DADAJ7 Influence of farm management on the dynamics of Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis shedding and antibiotic resistance during the growing period of broiler chickens None Experimental 62 None Production type Commercial (CFC) and optimal farming conditions Optimal farming conditions Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Polymyxins colistin None Salmonella spp. None None None 0 None 1 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
282 None 71 None None 10.1002/vetr.302 H8DADAJ7 Influence of farm management on the dynamics of Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis shedding and antibiotic resistance during the growing period of broiler chickens None Experimental 62 None Production type Commercial (CFC) and optimal farming conditions Optimal farming conditions Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftazidime None Salmonella spp. None None None 2 None 3 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
284 None 71 None None 10.1002/vetr.302 H8DADAJ7 Influence of farm management on the dynamics of Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis shedding and antibiotic resistance during the growing period of broiler chickens None Experimental 62 None Production type Commercial (CFC) and optimal farming conditions Optimal farming conditions Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. None None None 1 None 0 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
287 None 71 None None 10.1002/vetr.302 H8DADAJ7 Influence of farm management on the dynamics of Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis shedding and antibiotic resistance during the growing period of broiler chickens None Experimental 62 None Production type Commercial (CFC) and optimal farming conditions Optimal farming conditions Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Macrolides azithromycin None Salmonella spp. None None None 2 None 2 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
288 None 71 None None 10.1002/vetr.302 H8DADAJ7 Influence of farm management on the dynamics of Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis shedding and antibiotic resistance during the growing period of broiler chickens None Experimental 62 None Production type Commercial (CFC) and optimal farming conditions Optimal farming conditions Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tigecycline None Salmonella spp. None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
289 None 71 None None 10.1002/vetr.302 H8DADAJ7 Influence of farm management on the dynamics of Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis shedding and antibiotic resistance during the growing period of broiler chickens None Experimental 62 None Production type Commercial (CFC) and optimal farming conditions Optimal farming conditions Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
290 None 71 None None 10.1002/vetr.302 H8DADAJ7 Influence of farm management on the dynamics of Salmonella enterica serovar Infantis shedding and antibiotic resistance during the growing period of broiler chickens None Experimental 62 None Production type Commercial (CFC) and optimal farming conditions Optimal farming conditions Conventional farming Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. None None None 11 None 12 None None None None None 12 12 None None None None None
291 None 72 None None 10.1093/aje/kwx286 XI3RKT6E The Role of Mobile Genetic Elements in the Spread of Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli From Chickens to Humans in Small-Scale Production Poultry Operations in Rural Ecuador None Observational 63 None Production type Small-scale flocks vs. household small-scale productions Household flocks Small Scale production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 15.90 None 59.50 None 39 368 None None None None None
292 None 72 None None 10.1093/aje/kwx286 XI3RKT6E The Role of Mobile Genetic Elements in the Spread of Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli From Chickens to Humans in Small-Scale Production Poultry Operations in Rural Ecuador None Observational 63 None Production type Small-scale flocks vs. household small-scale productions Household flocks Small Scale production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 29.30 None 68.80 None 72 426 None None None None None
294 None 72 None None 10.1093/aje/kwx286 XI3RKT6E The Role of Mobile Genetic Elements in the Spread of Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli From Chickens to Humans in Small-Scale Production Poultry Operations in Rural Ecuador None Observational 63 None Production type Small-scale flocks vs. household small-scale productions Household flocks Small Scale production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 2.00 None 24.40 None 5 151 None None None None None
295 None 72 None None 10.1093/aje/kwx286 XI3RKT6E The Role of Mobile Genetic Elements in the Spread of Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli From Chickens to Humans in Small-Scale Production Poultry Operations in Rural Ecuador None Observational 63 None Production type Small-scale flocks vs. household small-scale productions Household flocks Small Scale production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 2.80 None 29.60 None 7 183 None None None None None
296 None 72 None None 10.1093/aje/kwx286 XI3RKT6E The Role of Mobile Genetic Elements in the Spread of Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli From Chickens to Humans in Small-Scale Production Poultry Operations in Rural Ecuador None Observational 63 None Production type Small-scale flocks vs. household small-scale productions Household flocks Small Scale production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 2.80 None 31.70 None 7 196 None None None None None
293 None 72 None None 10.1093/aje/kwx286 XI3RKT6E The Role of Mobile Genetic Elements in the Spread of Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli From Chickens to Humans in Small-Scale Production Poultry Operations in Rural Ecuador None Observational 63 None Production type Small-scale flocks vs. household small-scale productions Household flocks Small Scale production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 11.80 None 45.10 None 29 279 None None None None None
297 None 72 None None 10.1093/aje/kwx286 XI3RKT6E The Role of Mobile Genetic Elements in the Spread of Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli From Chickens to Humans in Small-Scale Production Poultry Operations in Rural Ecuador None Observational 63 None Production type Small-scale flocks vs. household small-scale productions Household flocks Small Scale production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 7.30 None 41.50 None 18 257 None None None None None
298 None 72 None None 10.1093/aje/kwx286 XI3RKT6E The Role of Mobile Genetic Elements in the Spread of Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli From Chickens to Humans in Small-Scale Production Poultry Operations in Rural Ecuador None Observational 63 None Production type Small-scale flocks vs. household small-scale productions Household flocks Small Scale production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 1.20 None 18.10 None 3 112 None None None None None
299 None 72 None None 10.1093/aje/kwx286 XI3RKT6E The Role of Mobile Genetic Elements in the Spread of Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli From Chickens to Humans in Small-Scale Production Poultry Operations in Rural Ecuador None Observational 63 None Production type Small-scale flocks vs. household small-scale productions Household flocks Small Scale production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.40 None 2.10 None 1 13 None None None None None
300 None 72 None None 10.1093/aje/kwx286 XI3RKT6E The Role of Mobile Genetic Elements in the Spread of Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli From Chickens to Humans in Small-Scale Production Poultry Operations in Rural Ecuador None Observational 63 None Production type Small-scale flocks vs. household small-scale productions Household flocks Small Scale production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 1.20 None 16.30 None 3 101 None None None None None
301 None 74 None None 10.1080/03079457.2021.2007850 B4EI2N7D Short-term and long-term effects of antimicrobial use on antimicrobial resistance in broiler and turkey farms None Observational 64 None Production Factors Farm Size Large farm Small farm Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None None None None None None None 1.70 1.10 2.64 .009 -0.001
302 None 74 None None 10.1080/03079457.2021.2007850 B4EI2N7D Short-term and long-term effects of antimicrobial use on antimicrobial resistance in broiler and turkey farms None Observational 64 None Production Factors Farm Size Large farm Small farm Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None None None None None None None 1.72 1.04 2.84 0.033 None
303 None 74 None None 10.1080/03079457.2021.2007850 B4EI2N7D Short-term and long-term effects of antimicrobial use on antimicrobial resistance in broiler and turkey farms None Observational 65 None AMU Past AMU High AMU Low AMU Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None None None None None None None 1.83 1.08 3.09 0.024 None
304 None 74 None None 10.1080/03079457.2021.2007850 B4EI2N7D Short-term and long-term effects of antimicrobial use on antimicrobial resistance in broiler and turkey farms None Observational 67 None Treatment Current treatment Yes (treatment) No (no treatment) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None None None None None None None 1.27 1.06 1.53 None None
305 None 74 None None 10.1080/03079457.2021.2007850 B4EI2N7D Short-term and long-term effects of antimicrobial use on antimicrobial resistance in broiler and turkey farms None Observational 67 None Treatment Current treatment Yes (treatment) No (no treatment) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio None Trimethoprim and derivatives trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None None None None None None None 1.95 1.35 2.81 0.000 None
306 None 74 None None 10.1080/03079457.2021.2007850 B4EI2N7D Short-term and long-term effects of antimicrobial use on antimicrobial resistance in broiler and turkey farms None Observational 67 None Treatment Current treatment Yes (treatment) No (no treatment) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None None None None None None None 1.72 1.04 2.84 0.033 None
307 None 74 None None 10.1080/03079457.2021.2007850 B4EI2N7D Short-term and long-term effects of antimicrobial use on antimicrobial resistance in broiler and turkey farms None Observational 67 None Treatment Current treatment Yes (treatment) No (no treatment) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None None None None None None None 1.50 1.07 2.11 0.02 None
308 None 75 None None 10.4314/thrb.v23i1.6 HHH8SSAN Prevalence, characterization and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella isolates from healthy broiler and free-range chickens in Morogoro, Tanzania None Observational 68 None Production Type Free range vs. Broilers Free range Broilers Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. None None None 2 None 5 None None None None None 3 8 None None None None None
310 None 75 None None 10.4314/thrb.v23i1.6 HHH8SSAN Prevalence, characterization and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella isolates from healthy broiler and free-range chickens in Morogoro, Tanzania None Observational 68 None Production Type Free range vs. Broilers Free range Broilers Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. None None None 1 None 2 None None None None None 3 8 None None None None None
311 None 75 None None 10.4314/thrb.v23i1.6 HHH8SSAN Prevalence, characterization and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella isolates from healthy broiler and free-range chickens in Morogoro, Tanzania None Observational 68 None Production Type Free range vs. Broilers Free range Broilers Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. None None None 0 None 4 None None None None None 3 8 None None None None None
312 None 75 None None 10.4314/thrb.v23i1.6 HHH8SSAN Prevalence, characterization and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella isolates from healthy broiler and free-range chickens in Morogoro, Tanzania None Observational 68 None Production Type Free range vs. Broilers Free range Broilers Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 3 8 None None None None None
313 None 75 None None 10.4314/thrb.v23i1.6 HHH8SSAN Prevalence, characterization and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella isolates from healthy broiler and free-range chickens in Morogoro, Tanzania None Observational 68 None Production Type Free range vs. Broilers Free range Broilers Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 3 8 None None None None None
315 None 77 None None 10.36547/nbc.935 XAUPIQUG Prevalence and molecular characteristics of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolated from retail chicken meat sold at the modern and traditional markets in Jakarta, Indonesia None Observational 69 None Retail types Traditional vs. Modern markets Modern markets Traditional markets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 8.00 None 1.18 None 25 85 None None None None None
316 None 77 None None 10.36547/nbc.935 XAUPIQUG Prevalence and molecular characteristics of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolated from retail chicken meat sold at the modern and traditional markets in Jakarta, Indonesia None Observational 69 None Retail types Traditional vs. Modern markets Modern markets Traditional markets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 68.00 None 65.88 None 25 85 None None None None None
317 None 77 None None 10.36547/nbc.935 XAUPIQUG Prevalence and molecular characteristics of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolated from retail chicken meat sold at the modern and traditional markets in Jakarta, Indonesia None Observational 69 None Retail types Traditional vs. Modern markets Modern markets Traditional markets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Monobactams aztreonam None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 44.00 None 17.65 None 25 85 None None None None None
318 None 77 None None 10.36547/nbc.935 XAUPIQUG Prevalence and molecular characteristics of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolated from retail chicken meat sold at the modern and traditional markets in Jakarta, Indonesia None Observational 69 None Retail types Traditional vs. Modern markets Modern markets Traditional markets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftazidime None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 28.00 None 45.88 None 25 85 None None None None None
320 None 77 None None 10.36547/nbc.935 XAUPIQUG Prevalence and molecular characteristics of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolated from retail chicken meat sold at the modern and traditional markets in Jakarta, Indonesia None Observational 69 None Retail types Traditional vs. Modern markets Modern markets Traditional markets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 8.00 None 2.35 None 25 85 None None None None None
321 None 77 None None 10.36547/nbc.935 XAUPIQUG Prevalence and molecular characteristics of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolated from retail chicken meat sold at the modern and traditional markets in Jakarta, Indonesia None Observational 69 None Retail types Traditional vs. Modern markets Modern markets Traditional markets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones levofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 48.00 None 48.24 None 25 85 None None None None None
322 None 77 None None 10.36547/nbc.935 XAUPIQUG Prevalence and molecular characteristics of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolated from retail chicken meat sold at the modern and traditional markets in Jakarta, Indonesia None Observational 69 None Retail types Traditional vs. Modern markets Modern markets Traditional markets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 3.53 None 25 85 None None None None None
324 None 77 None None 10.36547/nbc.935 XAUPIQUG Prevalence and molecular characteristics of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolated from retail chicken meat sold at the modern and traditional markets in Jakarta, Indonesia None Observational 69 None Retail types Traditional vs. Modern markets Modern markets Traditional markets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 25 85 None None None None None
325 None 77 None None 10.36547/nbc.935 XAUPIQUG Prevalence and molecular characteristics of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolated from retail chicken meat sold at the modern and traditional markets in Jakarta, Indonesia None Observational 69 None Retail types Traditional vs. Modern markets Modern markets Traditional markets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides tobramycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 48.00 None 54.94 None 25 85 None None None None None
326 None 77 None None 10.36547/nbc.935 XAUPIQUG Prevalence and molecular characteristics of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolated from retail chicken meat sold at the modern and traditional markets in Jakarta, Indonesia None Observational 69 None Retail types Traditional vs. Modern markets Modern markets Traditional markets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 28.00 None 24.71 None 25 85 None None None None None
327 None 77 None None 10.36547/nbc.935 XAUPIQUG Prevalence and molecular characteristics of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolated from retail chicken meat sold at the modern and traditional markets in Jakarta, Indonesia None Observational 69 None Retail types Traditional vs. Modern markets Modern markets Traditional markets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 92.00 None 94.12 None 25 85 None None None None None
328 None 77 None None 10.36547/nbc.935 XAUPIQUG Prevalence and molecular characteristics of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolated from retail chicken meat sold at the modern and traditional markets in Jakarta, Indonesia None Observational 69 None Retail types Traditional vs. Modern markets Modern markets Traditional markets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Carbapenems meropenem None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 25 85 None None None None None
329 None 78 None None 10.1128/AEM.02597-20 2QC2FT5J A novel method for measuring phenotypic colistin resistance in Escherichia coli populations from chicken flocks None Observational 70 None AMU Colistin use vs. no collistin use in the last 2 weeks Colistin use No colistin use Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Odds Ratio None Polymyxins colistin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None None None None None None None 5.30 1.17 2408.00 0.030 None
330 None 80 None None 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.07.010 83DMYRTL Antibiotic resistance, phylogenetic grouping and virulence potential of Escherichia coli isolated from the faeces of intensively farmed and free range poultry None Observational 71 None Production type Free range meat vs. Indoor commercial meat Free range meat chickens Indoor commercial chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 35.80 None 25.80 None 134 58 None None None None None
331 None 80 None None 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.07.010 83DMYRTL Antibiotic resistance, phylogenetic grouping and virulence potential of Escherichia coli isolated from the faeces of intensively farmed and free range poultry None Observational 71 None Production type Free range meat vs. Indoor commercial meat Free range meat chickens Indoor commercial chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols florfenicol None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 3.00 None 1.70 None 134 58 None None None None None
332 None 80 None None 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.07.010 83DMYRTL Antibiotic resistance, phylogenetic grouping and virulence potential of Escherichia coli isolated from the faeces of intensively farmed and free range poultry None Observational 71 None Production type Free range meat vs. Indoor commercial meat Free range meat chickens Indoor commercial chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides neomycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 37.00 None 17.20 None 134 58 None None None None None
333 None 80 None None 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.07.010 83DMYRTL Antibiotic resistance, phylogenetic grouping and virulence potential of Escherichia coli isolated from the faeces of intensively farmed and free range poultry None Observational 71 None Production type Free range meat vs. Indoor commercial meat Free range meat chickens Indoor commercial chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 112.00 None 17.20 None 134 58 None None None None None
334 None 80 None None 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.07.010 83DMYRTL Antibiotic resistance, phylogenetic grouping and virulence potential of Escherichia coli isolated from the faeces of intensively farmed and free range poultry None Observational 71 None Production type Free range meat vs. Indoor commercial meat Free range meat chickens Indoor commercial chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 9.70 None 17.20 None 134 58 None None None None None
335 None 80 None None 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.07.010 83DMYRTL Antibiotic resistance, phylogenetic grouping and virulence potential of Escherichia coli isolated from the faeces of intensively farmed and free range poultry None Observational 71 None Production type Free range meat vs. Indoor commercial meat Free range meat chickens Indoor commercial chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 11.90 None 25.90 None 134 58 None None None None None
336 None 80 None None 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.07.010 83DMYRTL Antibiotic resistance, phylogenetic grouping and virulence potential of Escherichia coli isolated from the faeces of intensively farmed and free range poultry None Observational 71 None Production type Free range meat vs. Indoor commercial meat Free range meat chickens Indoor commercial chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 11.90 None 25.90 None 134 58 None None None None None
337 None 81 None None 10.14202/vetworld.2022.2039-2045 NME4EMY7 Broad lytic spectrum of novel Salmonella phages on ciprofloxacin-resistant Salmonella contaminated in the broiler production chain; S and A Reagents Lab [Thailand], Merieux None Observational 72 None Production type Commercial farm vs. free-range farm Free-range farms Commercial famrs Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. None None None 3 None 0 None None None None None 51 51 None None None None None
338 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 74 None Production Type antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None 190 None 234 None None None None None 290 292 None None None None None
340 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 74 None Production Type antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli None None None 14 None 17 None None None None None 290 292 None None None None None
341 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 74 None Production Type antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Escherichia coli None None None 183 None 223 None None None None None 290 291 None None None None None
309 None 75 None None 10.4314/thrb.v23i1.6 HHH8SSAN Prevalence, characterization and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella isolates from healthy broiler and free-range chickens in Morogoro, Tanzania None Observational 68 None Production Type Free range vs. Broilers Free range Broilers Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 3 8 None None None None None
323 None 77 None None 10.36547/nbc.935 XAUPIQUG Prevalence and molecular characteristics of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolated from retail chicken meat sold at the modern and traditional markets in Jakarta, Indonesia None Observational 69 None Retail types Traditional vs. Modern markets Modern markets Traditional markets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 40.00 None 16.47 None 25 85 None None None None None
319 None 77 None None 10.36547/nbc.935 XAUPIQUG Prevalence and molecular characteristics of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli isolated from retail chicken meat sold at the modern and traditional markets in Jakarta, Indonesia None Observational 69 None Retail types Traditional vs. Modern markets Modern markets Traditional markets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefuroxime None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 12.00 None 4.71 None 25 85 None None None None None
342 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 74 None Production Type antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None 98 None 105 None None None None None 290 291 None None None None None
343 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 74 None Production Type antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None 124 None 197 None None None None None 290 291 None None None None None
344 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 74 None Production Type antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None 54 None 73 None None None None None 290 291 None None None None None
345 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 74 None Production Type antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli None None None 82 None 100 None None None None None 290 291 None None None None None
346 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 74 None Production Type antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli None None None 170 None 234 None None None None None 290 291 None None None None None
347 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 74 None Production Type antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli None None None 200 None 213 None None None None None 290 291 None None None None None
339 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 74 None Production Type antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli None None None 121 None 167 None None None None None 290 292 None None None None None
348 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 74 None Production Type antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None 172 None 222 None None None None None 290 291 None None None None None
349 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 74 None Production Type antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None 167 None 187 None None None None None 290 291 None None None None None
350 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 74 None Production Type antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None 125 None 179 None None None None None 290 291 None None None None None
351 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 74 None Production Type antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic-free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Polymyxins colistin None Escherichia coli None None None 5 None 10 None None None None None 264 290 None None None None None
352 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 75 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None 163 None 234 None None None None None 272 292 None None None None None
353 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 75 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli None None None 108 None 167 None None None None None 272 292 None None None None None
354 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 75 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli None None None 7 None 17 None None None None None 272 292 None None None None None
355 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 75 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Escherichia coli None None None 165 None 223 None None None None None 272 292 None None None None None
356 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 75 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Escherichia coli None None None 165 None 223 None None None None None 272 291 None None None None None
357 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 75 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None 38 None 105 None None None None None 272 291 None None None None None
358 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 75 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None 123 None 197 None None None None None 272 291 None None None None None
359 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 75 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli None None None 30 None 100 None None None None None 272 291 None None None None None
360 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 75 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli None None None 131 None 234 None None None None None 272 291 None None None None None
361 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 75 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli None None None 213 None 167 None None None None None 291 272 None None None None None
362 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 75 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None 112 None 222 None None None None None 272 291 None None None None None
363 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 75 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None 151 None 187 None None None None None 272 291 None None None None None
364 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 75 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None 64 None 179 None None None None None 272 291 None None None None None
365 None 82 None None YSMNBAK9 Antibiotic-resistant commensal Escherichia coli are less frequently isolated from poultry raised using non-conventional management systems than from conventional broiler None Observational 75 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Polymyxins colistin None Escherichia coli None None None 0 None 10 None None None None None 272 290 None None None None None
366 None 83 None None 10.1128/spectrum.00251-22 9769E6F3 Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and molecular characterization of Campylobacter isolated from broilers and broiler meat raised without antibiotics None Observational 76 None Production Type Conventional meat vs. no antibiotics ever (NAE) No antibiotics ever Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Macrolides azithromycin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 2 None 1 None None None None None 20 21 None None None None None
367 None 83 None None 10.1128/spectrum.00251-22 9769E6F3 Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and molecular characterization of Campylobacter isolated from broilers and broiler meat raised without antibiotics None Observational 76 None Production Type Conventional meat vs. no antibiotics ever (NAE) No antibiotics ever Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 0 None 2 None None None None None 20 21 None None None None None
368 None 83 None None 10.1128/spectrum.00251-22 9769E6F3 Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and molecular characterization of Campylobacter isolated from broilers and broiler meat raised without antibiotics None Observational 76 None Production Type Conventional meat vs. no antibiotics ever (NAE) No antibiotics ever Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Lincosamides clindamycin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 2 None 2 None None None None None 20 21 None None None None None
369 None 83 None None 10.1128/spectrum.00251-22 9769E6F3 Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and molecular characterization of Campylobacter isolated from broilers and broiler meat raised without antibiotics None Observational 76 None Production Type Conventional meat vs. no antibiotics ever (NAE) No antibiotics ever Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 2 None 2 None None None None None 20 21 None None None None None
370 None 83 None None 10.1128/spectrum.00251-22 9769E6F3 Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and molecular characterization of Campylobacter isolated from broilers and broiler meat raised without antibiotics None Observational 76 None Production Type Conventional meat vs. no antibiotics ever (NAE) No antibiotics ever Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 0 None 1 None None None None None 20 21 None None None None None
371 None 83 None None 10.1128/spectrum.00251-22 9769E6F3 Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and molecular characterization of Campylobacter isolated from broilers and broiler meat raised without antibiotics None Observational 76 None Production Type Conventional meat vs. no antibiotics ever (NAE) No antibiotics ever Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 3 None 10 None None None None None 20 21 None None None None None
372 None 83 None None 10.1128/spectrum.00251-22 9769E6F3 Prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and molecular characterization of Campylobacter isolated from broilers and broiler meat raised without antibiotics None Observational 76 None Production Type Conventional meat vs. no antibiotics ever (NAE) No antibiotics ever Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 2 None 5 None None None None None 20 21 None None None None None
373 None 85 None None 10.1016/j.genrep.2022.101618 MEWPWFWY Occurrence, antimicrobial resistance and virulence properties of thermophilic Campylobacter coli originating from two different poultry settings None Observational 78 None Production Type Commercial vs backyard Backyard Commercial Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter None None None None 3 None 6 None None None None None 3 10 None None None None None
377 None 85 None None 10.1016/j.genrep.2022.101618 MEWPWFWY Occurrence, antimicrobial resistance and virulence properties of thermophilic Campylobacter coli originating from two different poultry settings None Observational 78 None Production Type Commercial vs backyard Backyard Commercial Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones levofloxacin None Campylobacter None None None None 0 None 2 None None None None None 3 10 None None None None None
378 None 85 None None 10.1016/j.genrep.2022.101618 MEWPWFWY Occurrence, antimicrobial resistance and virulence properties of thermophilic Campylobacter coli originating from two different poultry settings None Observational 78 None Production Type Commercial vs backyard Backyard Commercial Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter None None None None 0 None 3 None None None None None 3 10 None None None None None
379 None 85 None None 10.1016/j.genrep.2022.101618 MEWPWFWY Occurrence, antimicrobial resistance and virulence properties of thermophilic Campylobacter coli originating from two different poultry settings None Observational 78 None Production Type Commercial vs backyard Backyard Commercial Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter None None None None 0 None 6 None None None None None 3 10 None None None None None
380 None 85 None None 10.1016/j.genrep.2022.101618 MEWPWFWY Occurrence, antimicrobial resistance and virulence properties of thermophilic Campylobacter coli originating from two different poultry settings None Observational 78 None Production Type Commercial vs backyard Backyard Commercial Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter None None None None 1 None 7 None None None None None 3 10 None None None None None
381 None 85 None None 10.1016/j.genrep.2022.101618 MEWPWFWY Occurrence, antimicrobial resistance and virulence properties of thermophilic Campylobacter coli originating from two different poultry settings None Observational 78 None Production Type Commercial vs backyard Backyard Commercial Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter None None None None 3 None 8 None None None None None 3 10 None None None None None
382 None 85 None None 10.1016/j.genrep.2022.101618 MEWPWFWY Occurrence, antimicrobial resistance and virulence properties of thermophilic Campylobacter coli originating from two different poultry settings None Observational 78 None Production Type Commercial vs backyard Backyard Commercial Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins oxacillin None Campylobacter None None None None 3 None 9 None None None None None 3 10 None None None None None
383 None 85 None None 10.1016/j.genrep.2022.101618 MEWPWFWY Occurrence, antimicrobial resistance and virulence properties of thermophilic Campylobacter coli originating from two different poultry settings None Observational 78 None Production Type Commercial vs backyard Backyard Commercial Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Campylobacter None None None None 1 None 2 None None None None None 3 10 None None None None None
384 None 85 None None 10.1016/j.genrep.2022.101618 MEWPWFWY Occurrence, antimicrobial resistance and virulence properties of thermophilic Campylobacter coli originating from two different poultry settings None Observational 78 None Production Type Commercial vs backyard Backyard Commercial Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefpodoxime None Campylobacter None None None None 3 None 7 None None None None None 3 10 None None None None None
385 None 85 None None 10.1016/j.genrep.2022.101618 MEWPWFWY Occurrence, antimicrobial resistance and virulence properties of thermophilic Campylobacter coli originating from two different poultry settings None Observational 78 None Production Type Commercial vs backyard Backyard Commercial Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Fourth-generation cephalosporins cefepime None Campylobacter None None None None 1 None 1 None None None None None 3 10 None None None None None
386 None 85 None None 10.1016/j.genrep.2022.101618 MEWPWFWY Occurrence, antimicrobial resistance and virulence properties of thermophilic Campylobacter coli originating from two different poultry settings None Observational 78 None Production Type Commercial vs backyard Backyard Commercial Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Campylobacter None None None None 3 None 5 None None None None None 3 10 None None None None None
387 None 85 None None 10.1016/j.genrep.2022.101618 MEWPWFWY Occurrence, antimicrobial resistance and virulence properties of thermophilic Campylobacter coli originating from two different poultry settings None Observational 78 None Production Type Commercial vs backyard Backyard Commercial Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Sulfonamides sulfadiazine None Campylobacter None None None None 0 None 4 None None None None None 3 10 None None None None None
388 None 87 None None 10.3390/ani10122217 QDTCUCXD Antibiotic Resistance of Escherichia coli Isolated from Conventional, No Antibiotics, and Humane Family Owned Retail Broiler Chicken Meat None Observational 79 None Production type Conventional vs. No antibiotic No antibiotic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 60.70 None 56.20 None 28 146 None None None None None
389 None 87 None None 10.3390/ani10122217 QDTCUCXD Antibiotic Resistance of Escherichia coli Isolated from Conventional, No Antibiotics, and Humane Family Owned Retail Broiler Chicken Meat None Observational 79 None Production type Conventional vs. No antibiotic No antibiotic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 96.40 None 94.00 None 28 149 None None None None None
390 None 87 None None 10.3390/ani10122217 QDTCUCXD Antibiotic Resistance of Escherichia coli Isolated from Conventional, No Antibiotics, and Humane Family Owned Retail Broiler Chicken Meat None Observational 80 None Production type Conventional vs. humane family owned Humane family owned Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 31.10 None 56.20 None 183 146 None None None None None
391 None 87 None None 10.3390/ani10122217 QDTCUCXD Antibiotic Resistance of Escherichia coli Isolated from Conventional, No Antibiotics, and Humane Family Owned Retail Broiler Chicken Meat None Observational 80 None Production type Conventional vs. humane family owned Humane family owned Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 77.20 None 94.00 None 184 149 None None None None None
403 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 81 None Production type Conventionally reared vs. free range Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 17 23 None None None None None
392 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 81 None Production type Conventionally reared vs. free range Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter coli None None None 25 None 20 None None None None None 29 27 None None None None None
394 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 81 None Production type Conventionally reared vs. free range Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter coli None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 29 27 None None None None None
401 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 81 None Production type Conventionally reared vs. free range Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter coli None None None 29 None 27 None None None None None 29 27 None None None None None
393 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 81 None Production type Conventionally reared vs. free range Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Campylobacter coli None None None 1 None 0 None None None None None 29 27 None None None None None
412 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 82 None Production type Backyard vs. conventionally raised Backyard chicken Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter coli None None None 17 None 20 None None None None None 22 27 None None None None None
402 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 81 None Production type Conventionally reared vs. free range Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 15 None 23 None None None None None 17 23 None None None None None
395 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 81 None Production type Conventionally reared vs. free range Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli None None None 29 None 27 None None None None None 29 27 None None None None None
406 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 81 None Production type Conventionally reared vs. free range Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 15 None 23 None None None None None 17 23 None None None None None
407 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 81 None Production type Conventionally reared vs. free range Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 1 None 4 None None None None None 17 23 None None None None None
397 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 81 None Production type Conventionally reared vs. free range Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli None None None 10 None 19 None None None None None 29 27 None None None None None
404 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 81 None Production type Conventionally reared vs. free range Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 17 23 None None None None None
399 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 81 None Production type Conventionally reared vs. free range Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 29 27 None None None None None
400 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 81 None Production type Conventionally reared vs. free range Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Carbapenems meropenem None Campylobacter coli None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 29 27 None None None None None
408 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 81 None Production type Conventionally reared vs. free range Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 15 None 23 None None None None None 17 23 None None None None None
398 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 81 None Production type Conventionally reared vs. free range Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli None None None 27 None 27 None None None None None 29 27 None None None None None
411 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 81 None Production type Conventionally reared vs. free range Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 15 None 23 None None None None None 17 23 None None None None None
410 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 81 None Production type Conventionally reared vs. free range Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Carbapenems meropenem None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 17 23 None None None None None
409 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 81 None Production type Conventionally reared vs. free range Free-range Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 17 23 None None None None None
414 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 82 None Production type Backyard vs. conventionally raised Backyard chicken Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Campylobacter coli None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 22 27 None None None None None
413 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 82 None Production type Backyard vs. conventionally raised Backyard chicken Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter coli None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 22 27 None None None None None
415 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 82 None Production type Backyard vs. conventionally raised Backyard chicken Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter coli None None None 22 None 27 None None None None None 22 27 None None None None None
416 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 82 None Production type Backyard vs. conventionally raised Backyard chicken Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter coli None None None 22 None 27 None None None None None 22 27 None None None None None
417 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 82 None Production type Backyard vs. conventionally raised Backyard chicken Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter coli None None None 2 None 9 None None None None None 22 27 None None None None None
418 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 82 None Production type Backyard vs. conventionally raised Backyard chicken Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter coli None None None 22 None 27 None None None None None 22 27 None None None None None
419 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 82 None Production type Backyard vs. conventionally raised Backyard chicken Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Campylobacter coli None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 22 27 None None None None None
420 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 82 None Production type Backyard vs. conventionally raised Backyard chicken Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Carbapenems meropenem None Campylobacter coli None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 22 27 None None None None None
421 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 82 None Production type Backyard vs. conventionally raised Backyard chicken Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 10 None 23 None None None None None 12 23 None None None None None
422 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 82 None Production type Backyard vs. conventionally raised Backyard chicken Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 12 23 None None None None None
423 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 82 None Production type Backyard vs. conventionally raised Backyard chicken Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 12 23 None None None None None
424 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 82 None Production type Backyard vs. conventionally raised Backyard chicken Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 12 None 23 None None None None None 12 23 None None None None None
425 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 82 None Production type Backyard vs. conventionally raised Backyard chicken Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 0 None 4 None None None None None 12 23 None None None None None
426 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 82 None Production type Backyard vs. conventionally raised Backyard chicken Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 10 None 23 None None None None None 12 23 None None None None None
427 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 82 None Production type Backyard vs. conventionally raised Backyard chicken Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 12 23 None None None None None
428 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 82 None Production type Backyard vs. conventionally raised Backyard chicken Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Carbapenems meropenem None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 12 23 None None None None None
429 None 88 None None 10.3390/foods11131827 96PQ5T99 Occurrence and Multidrug Resistance of Campylobacter in Chicken Meat from Different Production Systems None Observational 82 None Production type Backyard vs. conventionally raised Backyard chicken Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter jejuni None None None 12 None 23 None None None None None 12 23 None None None None None
435 None 95 None None 10.18805/IJAR.B-4005 NW8LWBKV Distribution of TET, AAC and CTX-M genes among antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli isolated from poultry under various farming system of A and N Islands None Observational 86 None Production type Organized farm vs. backayrd Backyard farm Organized Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None First-generation cephalosporins cefalexin None Escherichia coli None None None 2 None 13 None None None None None 23 24 None None None None None
434 None 95 None None 10.18805/IJAR.B-4005 NW8LWBKV Distribution of TET, AAC and CTX-M genes among antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli isolated from poultry under various farming system of A and N Islands None Observational 86 None Production type Organized farm vs. backayrd Backyard farm Organized Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None 13 None 6 None None None None None 23 24 None None None None None
436 None 95 None None 10.18805/IJAR.B-4005 NW8LWBKV Distribution of TET, AAC and CTX-M genes among antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli isolated from poultry under various farming system of A and N Islands None Observational 86 None Production type Organized farm vs. backayrd Backyard farm Organized Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Escherichia coli None None None 9 None 11 None None None None None 23 24 None None None None None
437 None 95 None None 10.18805/IJAR.B-4005 NW8LWBKV Distribution of TET, AAC and CTX-M genes among antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli isolated from poultry under various farming system of A and N Islands None Observational 86 None Production type Organized farm vs. backayrd Backyard farm Organized Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins cloxacillin None Escherichia coli None None None 19 None 22 None None None None None 23 24 None None None None None
438 None 95 None None 10.18805/IJAR.B-4005 NW8LWBKV Distribution of TET, AAC and CTX-M genes among antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli isolated from poultry under various farming system of A and N Islands None Observational 86 None Production type Organized farm vs. backayrd Backyard farm Organized Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None 15 None 13 None None None None None 23 24 None None None None None
439 None 95 None None 10.18805/IJAR.B-4005 NW8LWBKV Distribution of TET, AAC and CTX-M genes among antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli isolated from poultry under various farming system of A and N Islands None Observational 86 None Production type Organized farm vs. backayrd Backyard farm Organized Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None 6 None 7 None None None None None 23 24 None None None None None
440 None 95 None None 10.18805/IJAR.B-4005 NW8LWBKV Distribution of TET, AAC and CTX-M genes among antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli isolated from poultry under various farming system of A and N Islands None Observational 86 None Production type Organized farm vs. backayrd Backyard farm Organized Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None 10 None 6 None None None None None 23 24 None None None None None
441 None 95 None None 10.18805/IJAR.B-4005 NW8LWBKV Distribution of TET, AAC and CTX-M genes among antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli isolated from poultry under various farming system of A and N Islands None Observational 86 None Production type Organized farm vs. backayrd Backyard farm Organized Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None 8 None 8 None None None None None 23 24 None None None None None
442 None 95 None None 10.18805/IJAR.B-4005 NW8LWBKV Distribution of TET, AAC and CTX-M genes among antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli isolated from poultry under various farming system of A and N Islands None Observational 86 None Production type Organized farm vs. backayrd Backyard farm Organized Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None 5 None 7 None None None None None 23 24 None None None None None
443 None 95 None None 10.18805/IJAR.B-4005 NW8LWBKV Distribution of TET, AAC and CTX-M genes among antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli isolated from poultry under various farming system of A and N Islands None Observational 86 None Production type Organized farm vs. backayrd Backyard farm Organized Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli None None None 7 None 6 None None None None None 23 24 None None None None None
444 None 96 None None 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.07.028 HATCF97Q Occurrence of extended spectrum beta-lactamase and AmpC genes among multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli and emergence of ST131 from poultry meat in Thailand None Observational 87 None Retail type Open air markets vs. supermarkets Open air markets Supermarket Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli None None None 69 None 61 None None None None None 126 92 None None None None None
445 None 98 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101527 WYKC9GMM Molecular and phenotypic characterization of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from commercial broilers and native chickens None Observational 90 None Production type Broiler vs. native chickens Native Chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 78.60 None 98.90 None 42 90 None None None None None
446 None 98 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101527 WYKC9GMM Molecular and phenotypic characterization of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from commercial broilers and native chickens None Observational 90 None Production type Broiler vs. native chickens Native Chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 9.50 None 42.20 None 42 90 None None None None None
447 None 98 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101527 WYKC9GMM Molecular and phenotypic characterization of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from commercial broilers and native chickens None Observational 90 None Production type Broiler vs. native chickens Native Chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Polymyxins colistin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 42 90 None None None None None
448 None 98 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101527 WYKC9GMM Molecular and phenotypic characterization of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from commercial broilers and native chickens None Observational 90 None Production type Broiler vs. native chickens Native Chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 11.90 None 10.00 None 42 90 None None None None None
449 None 98 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101527 WYKC9GMM Molecular and phenotypic characterization of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from commercial broilers and native chickens None Observational 90 None Production type Broiler vs. native chickens Native Chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 7.10 None 68.90 None 42 90 None None None None None
450 None 98 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101527 WYKC9GMM Molecular and phenotypic characterization of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from commercial broilers and native chickens None Observational 90 None Production type Broiler vs. native chickens Native Chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 7.10 None 68.90 None 42 90 None None None None None
451 None 98 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101527 WYKC9GMM Molecular and phenotypic characterization of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from commercial broilers and native chickens None Observational 90 None Production type Broiler vs. native chickens Native Chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Carbapenems meropenem None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 1.10 None 42 90 None None None None None
452 None 98 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101527 WYKC9GMM Molecular and phenotypic characterization of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from commercial broilers and native chickens None Observational 90 None Production type Broiler vs. native chickens Native Chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 7.10 None 72.20 None 42 90 None None None None None
453 None 98 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101527 WYKC9GMM Molecular and phenotypic characterization of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from commercial broilers and native chickens None Observational 90 None Production type Broiler vs. native chickens Native Chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 2.40 None 45.60 None 42 90 None None None None None
454 None 98 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101527 WYKC9GMM Molecular and phenotypic characterization of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from commercial broilers and native chickens None Observational 90 None Production type Broiler vs. native chickens Native Chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 76.10 None 88.90 None 42 90 None None None None None
455 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 91 None Production Type Antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None 55 None 54 None None None None None 55 54 None None None None None
456 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 91 None Production Type Antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli None None None 25 None 35 None None None None None 55 54 None None None None None
457 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 91 None Production Type Antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli None None None 26 None 39 None None None None None 55 54 None None None None None
458 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 91 None Production Type Antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Escherichia coli None None None 54 None 54 None None None None None 55 54 None None None None None
459 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 91 None Production Type Antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None 17 None 18 None None None None None 55 54 None None None None None
460 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 91 None Production Type Antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None 10 None 19 None None None None None 55 54 None None None None None
461 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 91 None Production Type Antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None 3 None 3 None None None None None 55 54 None None None None None
462 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 91 None Production Type Antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli None None None 4 None 9 None None None None None 55 54 None None None None None
463 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 91 None Production Type Antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli None None None 28 None 26 None None None None None 55 54 None None None None None
464 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 91 None Production Type Antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli None None None 21 None 12 None None None None None 55 54 None None None None None
465 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 91 None Production Type Antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None 21 None 32 None None None None None 55 54 None None None None None
466 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 91 None Production Type Antibiotic-free vs. conventional Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None 35 None 32 None None None None None 55 54 None None None None None
467 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 92 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None 46 None 54 None None None None None 47 54 None None None None None
468 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 92 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli None None None 31 None 35 None None None None None 47 54 None None None None None
469 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 92 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli None None None 28 None 39 None None None None None 47 54 None None None None None
470 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 92 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Escherichia coli None None None 44 None 54 None None None None None 47 54 None None None None None
471 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 92 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None 5 None 18 None None None None None 47 54 None None None None None
472 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 92 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None 21 None 19 None None None None None 47 54 None None None None None
473 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 92 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None 4 None 3 None None None None None 47 54 None None None None None
474 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 92 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli None None None 1 None 9 None None None None None 47 54 None None None None None
475 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 92 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli None None None 29 None 26 None None None None None 47 54 None None None None None
476 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 92 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli None None None 4 None 12 None None None None None 47 54 None None None None None
477 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 92 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None 29 None 32 None None None None None 47 54 None None None None None
478 None 99 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111484 SHYNKNPD Assessing the Load, Virulence and Antibiotic-Resistant Traits of ESBL/Ampc E. coli from Broilers Raised on Conventional, Antibiotic-Free, and Organic Farms; Illumina [United States], Qiagen [Switzerland], Qiagen [Germany], Thermo [Italy] None Observational 92 None Production type Organic vs. conventional Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None 14 None 32 None None None None None 47 54 None None None None None
479 None 101 None None 10.1128/AEM.00037-19 525E3ZBP Effect of Cessation of Ceftiofur and Substitution with Lincomycin-Spectinomycin on Extended-Spectrum-beta-Lactamase/AmpC Genes and Multidrug Resistance in Escherichia coli from a Canadian Broiler Production Pyramid None Observational 93 None AMU Before and after ceftiofur cessation (2014)/(2015) After (2015) Before (2015) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 7.00 None 15.00 None 14 206 None None None None None
480 None 101 None None 10.1128/AEM.00037-19 525E3ZBP Effect of Cessation of Ceftiofur and Substitution with Lincomycin-Spectinomycin on Extended-Spectrum-beta-Lactamase/AmpC Genes and Multidrug Resistance in Escherichia coli from a Canadian Broiler Production Pyramid None Observational 93 None AMU Before and after ceftiofur cessation (2014)/(2015) After (2015) Before (2015) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 14 20 None None None None None
481 None 101 None None 10.1128/AEM.00037-19 525E3ZBP Effect of Cessation of Ceftiofur and Substitution with Lincomycin-Spectinomycin on Extended-Spectrum-beta-Lactamase/AmpC Genes and Multidrug Resistance in Escherichia coli from a Canadian Broiler Production Pyramid None Observational 93 None AMU Before and after ceftiofur cessation (2014)/(2015) After (2015) Before (2015) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 14 20 None None None None None
482 None 101 None None 10.1128/AEM.00037-19 525E3ZBP Effect of Cessation of Ceftiofur and Substitution with Lincomycin-Spectinomycin on Extended-Spectrum-beta-Lactamase/AmpC Genes and Multidrug Resistance in Escherichia coli from a Canadian Broiler Production Pyramid None Observational 93 None AMU Before and after ceftiofur cessation (2014)/(2015) After (2015) Before (2015) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 14 20 None None None None None
484 None 101 None None 10.1128/AEM.00037-19 525E3ZBP Effect of Cessation of Ceftiofur and Substitution with Lincomycin-Spectinomycin on Extended-Spectrum-beta-Lactamase/AmpC Genes and Multidrug Resistance in Escherichia coli from a Canadian Broiler Production Pyramid None Observational 93 None AMU Before and after ceftiofur cessation (2014)/(2015) After (2015) Before (2015) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 14 20 None None None None None
485 None 101 None None 10.1128/AEM.00037-19 525E3ZBP Effect of Cessation of Ceftiofur and Substitution with Lincomycin-Spectinomycin on Extended-Spectrum-beta-Lactamase/AmpC Genes and Multidrug Resistance in Escherichia coli from a Canadian Broiler Production Pyramid None Observational 93 None AMU Before and after ceftiofur cessation (2014)/(2015) After (2015) Before (2015) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 14 20 None None None None None
486 None 101 None None 10.1128/AEM.00037-19 525E3ZBP Effect of Cessation of Ceftiofur and Substitution with Lincomycin-Spectinomycin on Extended-Spectrum-beta-Lactamase/AmpC Genes and Multidrug Resistance in Escherichia coli from a Canadian Broiler Production Pyramid None Observational 93 None AMU Before and after ceftiofur cessation (2014)/(2015) After (2015) Before (2015) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 71.00 None 45.00 None 14 20 None None None None None
487 None 101 None None 10.1128/AEM.00037-19 525E3ZBP Effect of Cessation of Ceftiofur and Substitution with Lincomycin-Spectinomycin on Extended-Spectrum-beta-Lactamase/AmpC Genes and Multidrug Resistance in Escherichia coli from a Canadian Broiler Production Pyramid None Observational 93 None AMU Before and after ceftiofur cessation (2014)/(2015) After (2015) Before (2015) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Other antibacterials spectinomycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 50.00 None 25.00 None 14 20 None None None None None
488 None 101 None None 10.1128/AEM.00037-19 525E3ZBP Effect of Cessation of Ceftiofur and Substitution with Lincomycin-Spectinomycin on Extended-Spectrum-beta-Lactamase/AmpC Genes and Multidrug Resistance in Escherichia coli from a Canadian Broiler Production Pyramid None Observational 93 None AMU Before and after ceftiofur cessation (2014)/(2015) After (2015) Before (2015) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 71.00 None 85.00 None 14 20 None None None None None
489 None 101 None None 10.1128/AEM.00037-19 525E3ZBP Effect of Cessation of Ceftiofur and Substitution with Lincomycin-Spectinomycin on Extended-Spectrum-beta-Lactamase/AmpC Genes and Multidrug Resistance in Escherichia coli from a Canadian Broiler Production Pyramid None Observational 93 None AMU Before and after ceftiofur cessation (2014)/(2015) After (2015) Before (2015) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 14 20 None None None None None
490 None 101 None None 10.1128/AEM.00037-19 525E3ZBP Effect of Cessation of Ceftiofur and Substitution with Lincomycin-Spectinomycin on Extended-Spectrum-beta-Lactamase/AmpC Genes and Multidrug Resistance in Escherichia coli from a Canadian Broiler Production Pyramid None Observational 93 None AMU Before and after ceftiofur cessation (2014)/(2015) After (2015) Before (2015) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 7.00 None 65.00 None 14 20 None None None None None
491 None 101 None None 10.1128/AEM.00037-19 525E3ZBP Effect of Cessation of Ceftiofur and Substitution with Lincomycin-Spectinomycin on Extended-Spectrum-beta-Lactamase/AmpC Genes and Multidrug Resistance in Escherichia coli from a Canadian Broiler Production Pyramid None Observational 93 None AMU Before and after ceftiofur cessation (2014)/(2015) After (2015) Before (2015) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 7.00 None 25.00 None 14 20 None None None None None
492 None 101 None None 10.1128/AEM.00037-19 525E3ZBP Effect of Cessation of Ceftiofur and Substitution with Lincomycin-Spectinomycin on Extended-Spectrum-beta-Lactamase/AmpC Genes and Multidrug Resistance in Escherichia coli from a Canadian Broiler Production Pyramid None Observational 93 None AMU Before and after ceftiofur cessation (2014)/(2015) After (2015) Before (2015) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 50.00 None 85.00 None 14 20 None None None None None
483 None 101 None None 10.1128/AEM.00037-19 525E3ZBP Effect of Cessation of Ceftiofur and Substitution with Lincomycin-Spectinomycin on Extended-Spectrum-beta-Lactamase/AmpC Genes and Multidrug Resistance in Escherichia coli from a Canadian Broiler Production Pyramid None Observational 93 None AMU Before and after ceftiofur cessation (2014)/(2015) After (2015) Before (2015) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides azithromycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 10.00 None 14 20 None None None None None
493 None 106 None None 10.14710/jitaa.44.2.228-240 ZQYXQTBQ Comparison of antibiotic resistance pattern among enteropathogenic bacteria isolated from broiler and backyard chicken meat None Observational 95 None Production type Backyard vs. broiler Backyard chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus None None None None 183 None 210 None None None None None 310 304 None None None None None
494 None 106 None None 10.14710/jitaa.44.2.228-240 ZQYXQTBQ Comparison of antibiotic resistance pattern among enteropathogenic bacteria isolated from broiler and backyard chicken meat None Observational 95 None Production type Backyard vs. broiler Backyard chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus None None None None 25 None 47 None None None None None 310 304 None None None None None
495 None 106 None None 10.14710/jitaa.44.2.228-240 ZQYXQTBQ Comparison of antibiotic resistance pattern among enteropathogenic bacteria isolated from broiler and backyard chicken meat None Observational 95 None Production type Backyard vs. broiler Backyard chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Enterococcus None None None None 25 None 31 None None None None None 310 304 None None None None None
496 None 106 None None 10.14710/jitaa.44.2.228-240 ZQYXQTBQ Comparison of antibiotic resistance pattern among enteropathogenic bacteria isolated from broiler and backyard chicken meat None Observational 95 None Production type Backyard vs. broiler Backyard chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus None None None None 33 None 75 None None None None None 310 304 None None None None None
497 None 106 None None 10.14710/jitaa.44.2.228-240 ZQYXQTBQ Comparison of antibiotic resistance pattern among enteropathogenic bacteria isolated from broiler and backyard chicken meat None Observational 95 None Production type Backyard vs. broiler Backyard chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Enterococcus None None None None 101 None 188 None None None None None 310 304 None None None None None
432 None 93 None None 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.020 5W3UFYBM Resistance to three antimicrobial agents of Campylobacter isolated from organically- and intensively-reared chickens purchased from retail outlets None Observational 85 None Production Type POC, pre-packaged supermarket organically-reared chicken vs. PIC, pre-packaged supermarket intensively-reared chicken Pre-packaged supermarket organically-reared chicken Pre-packaged supermarket intensively-reared chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter None None None None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
433 None 93 None None 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.020 5W3UFYBM Resistance to three antimicrobial agents of Campylobacter isolated from organically- and intensively-reared chickens purchased from retail outlets None Observational 85 None Production Type POC, pre-packaged supermarket organically-reared chicken vs. PIC, pre-packaged supermarket intensively-reared chicken Pre-packaged supermarket organically-reared chicken Pre-packaged supermarket intensively-reared chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Campylobacter None None None None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 30 30 None None None None None
504 None 107 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101118 AUYNDKMX Effect of inclusion of micronized camelina, sunflower, and flax seeds in the broiler chicken diet on performance productivity, nutrient utilization, and intestinal microbial populations None Experimental 96 None Treatement Control − diet without micronized oilseeds. CAM.IR − diet with 15% of micronized camelina seeds. Diet with 15% of micronized camelina seeds. (Feed additive) No feed additive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 23.00 None 30.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
499 None 107 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101118 AUYNDKMX Effect of inclusion of micronized camelina, sunflower, and flax seeds in the broiler chicken diet on performance productivity, nutrient utilization, and intestinal microbial populations None Experimental 96 None Treatement Control − diet without micronized oilseeds. CAM.IR − diet with 15% of micronized camelina seeds. Diet with 15% of micronized camelina seeds. (Feed additive) No feed additive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 10.00 None 17.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
502 None 107 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101118 AUYNDKMX Effect of inclusion of micronized camelina, sunflower, and flax seeds in the broiler chicken diet on performance productivity, nutrient utilization, and intestinal microbial populations None Experimental 96 None Treatement Control − diet without micronized oilseeds. CAM.IR − diet with 15% of micronized camelina seeds. Diet with 15% of micronized camelina seeds. (Feed additive) No feed additive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 87.00 None 70.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
501 None 107 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101118 AUYNDKMX Effect of inclusion of micronized camelina, sunflower, and flax seeds in the broiler chicken diet on performance productivity, nutrient utilization, and intestinal microbial populations None Experimental 96 None Treatement Control − diet without micronized oilseeds. CAM.IR − diet with 15% of micronized camelina seeds. Diet with 15% of micronized camelina seeds. (Feed additive) No feed additive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 70.00 None 13.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
500 None 107 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101118 AUYNDKMX Effect of inclusion of micronized camelina, sunflower, and flax seeds in the broiler chicken diet on performance productivity, nutrient utilization, and intestinal microbial populations None Experimental 96 None Treatement Control − diet without micronized oilseeds. CAM.IR − diet with 15% of micronized camelina seeds. Diet with 15% of micronized camelina seeds. (Feed additive) No feed additive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 30.00 None 23.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
510 None 107 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101118 AUYNDKMX Effect of inclusion of micronized camelina, sunflower, and flax seeds in the broiler chicken diet on performance productivity, nutrient utilization, and intestinal microbial populations None Experimental 97 None Treatment Control − diet without micronized oilseeds vs. FLA.IR − with 15% of micronized flax seeds. FLA.IR − with 15% of micronized flax seeds (Feed additive) No feed additive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 80.00 None 30.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
505 None 107 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101118 AUYNDKMX Effect of inclusion of micronized camelina, sunflower, and flax seeds in the broiler chicken diet on performance productivity, nutrient utilization, and intestinal microbial populations None Experimental 97 None Treatment Control − diet without micronized oilseeds vs. FLA.IR − with 15% of micronized flax seeds. FLA.IR − with 15% of micronized flax seeds (Feed additive) No feed additive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 0.00 None 17.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
509 None 107 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101118 AUYNDKMX Effect of inclusion of micronized camelina, sunflower, and flax seeds in the broiler chicken diet on performance productivity, nutrient utilization, and intestinal microbial populations None Experimental 97 None Treatment Control − diet without micronized oilseeds vs. FLA.IR − with 15% of micronized flax seeds. FLA.IR − with 15% of micronized flax seeds (Feed additive) No feed additive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
508 None 107 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101118 AUYNDKMX Effect of inclusion of micronized camelina, sunflower, and flax seeds in the broiler chicken diet on performance productivity, nutrient utilization, and intestinal microbial populations None Experimental 97 None Treatment Control − diet without micronized oilseeds vs. FLA.IR − with 15% of micronized flax seeds. FLA.IR − with 15% of micronized flax seeds (Feed additive) No feed additive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 100.00 None 70.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
506 None 107 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101118 AUYNDKMX Effect of inclusion of micronized camelina, sunflower, and flax seeds in the broiler chicken diet on performance productivity, nutrient utilization, and intestinal microbial populations None Experimental 97 None Treatment Control − diet without micronized oilseeds vs. FLA.IR − with 15% of micronized flax seeds. FLA.IR − with 15% of micronized flax seeds (Feed additive) No feed additive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 27.00 None 23.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
511 None 107 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101118 AUYNDKMX Effect of inclusion of micronized camelina, sunflower, and flax seeds in the broiler chicken diet on performance productivity, nutrient utilization, and intestinal microbial populations None Experimental 98 None Treatment Control − diet without micronized oilseeds. vs SUN.IR − diet with 15% of micronized sunflower seeds. SUN.IR − diet with 15% of micronized sunflower seeds. (feed additive) No feed additive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 7.00 None 17.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
516 None 107 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101118 AUYNDKMX Effect of inclusion of micronized camelina, sunflower, and flax seeds in the broiler chicken diet on performance productivity, nutrient utilization, and intestinal microbial populations None Experimental 98 None Treatment Control − diet without micronized oilseeds. vs SUN.IR − diet with 15% of micronized sunflower seeds. SUN.IR − diet with 15% of micronized sunflower seeds. (feed additive) No feed additive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 30.00 None 30.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
515 None 107 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101118 AUYNDKMX Effect of inclusion of micronized camelina, sunflower, and flax seeds in the broiler chicken diet on performance productivity, nutrient utilization, and intestinal microbial populations None Experimental 98 None Treatment Control − diet without micronized oilseeds. vs SUN.IR − diet with 15% of micronized sunflower seeds. SUN.IR − diet with 15% of micronized sunflower seeds. (feed additive) No feed additive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
514 None 107 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101118 AUYNDKMX Effect of inclusion of micronized camelina, sunflower, and flax seeds in the broiler chicken diet on performance productivity, nutrient utilization, and intestinal microbial populations None Experimental 98 None Treatment Control − diet without micronized oilseeds. vs SUN.IR − diet with 15% of micronized sunflower seeds. SUN.IR − diet with 15% of micronized sunflower seeds. (feed additive) No feed additive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 100.00 None 70.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
513 None 107 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101118 AUYNDKMX Effect of inclusion of micronized camelina, sunflower, and flax seeds in the broiler chicken diet on performance productivity, nutrient utilization, and intestinal microbial populations None Experimental 98 None Treatment Control − diet without micronized oilseeds. vs SUN.IR − diet with 15% of micronized sunflower seeds. SUN.IR − diet with 15% of micronized sunflower seeds. (feed additive) No feed additive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 76.00 None 13.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
14 None 13 None None 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.06.005 YTD23YDM Antimicrobial resistance in E. coli isolates from conventionally and organically reared poultry: A comparison of agar disc diffusion and Sensi Test Gram-negative methods None Observational 11 None Organic Production Organic chicken Conventionally raised chicken Chicken Carcass None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 13.30 None 26.70 None 30 30 None None None None None
430 None 89 None None 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 7WRJ4NE5 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles Among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam None Observational 83 None Retail type Market vs. SM fresh Market SM Fresh Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 57.00 None 46.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
498 None 106 None None 10.14710/jitaa.44.2.228-240 ZQYXQTBQ Comparison of antibiotic resistance pattern among enteropathogenic bacteria isolated from broiler and backyard chicken meat None Observational 95 None Production type Backyard vs. broiler Backyard chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Enterococcus None None None None 81 None 140 None None None None None 310 304 None None None None None
517 None 70 None None 10.3390/ani11041005 H6KMQU4K Commensal escherichia coli antimicrobial resistance and multidrug-resistance dynamics during broiler growing period: Commercial vs. improved farm conditions None Experimental 100 None Production types CFC: Commercial farm conditions, IFC: Improved farm conditions IFC: Improved farm conditions CFC: Commercial farm conditions Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 50.00 None 60.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
518 None 70 None None 10.3390/ani11041005 H6KMQU4K Commensal escherichia coli antimicrobial resistance and multidrug-resistance dynamics during broiler growing period: Commercial vs. improved farm conditions None Experimental 100 None Production types CFC: Commercial farm conditions, IFC: Improved farm conditions IFC: Improved farm conditions CFC: Commercial farm conditions Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 65.00 None 65.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
519 None 70 None None 10.3390/ani11041005 H6KMQU4K Commensal escherichia coli antimicrobial resistance and multidrug-resistance dynamics during broiler growing period: Commercial vs. improved farm conditions None Experimental 100 None Production types CFC: Commercial farm conditions, IFC: Improved farm conditions IFC: Improved farm conditions CFC: Commercial farm conditions Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
520 None 70 None None 10.3390/ani11041005 H6KMQU4K Commensal escherichia coli antimicrobial resistance and multidrug-resistance dynamics during broiler growing period: Commercial vs. improved farm conditions None Experimental 100 None Production types CFC: Commercial farm conditions, IFC: Improved farm conditions IFC: Improved farm conditions CFC: Commercial farm conditions Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftazidime None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 4.00 None 2.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
521 None 70 None None 10.3390/ani11041005 H6KMQU4K Commensal escherichia coli antimicrobial resistance and multidrug-resistance dynamics during broiler growing period: Commercial vs. improved farm conditions None Experimental 100 None Production types CFC: Commercial farm conditions, IFC: Improved farm conditions IFC: Improved farm conditions CFC: Commercial farm conditions Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 35.00 None 45.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
522 None 70 None None 10.3390/ani11041005 H6KMQU4K Commensal escherichia coli antimicrobial resistance and multidrug-resistance dynamics during broiler growing period: Commercial vs. improved farm conditions None Experimental 100 None Production types CFC: Commercial farm conditions, IFC: Improved farm conditions IFC: Improved farm conditions CFC: Commercial farm conditions Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
523 None 70 None None 10.3390/ani11041005 H6KMQU4K Commensal escherichia coli antimicrobial resistance and multidrug-resistance dynamics during broiler growing period: Commercial vs. improved farm conditions None Experimental 100 None Production types CFC: Commercial farm conditions, IFC: Improved farm conditions IFC: Improved farm conditions CFC: Commercial farm conditions Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 35.00 None 10.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
524 None 70 None None 10.3390/ani11041005 H6KMQU4K Commensal escherichia coli antimicrobial resistance and multidrug-resistance dynamics during broiler growing period: Commercial vs. improved farm conditions None Experimental 100 None Production types CFC: Commercial farm conditions, IFC: Improved farm conditions IFC: Improved farm conditions CFC: Commercial farm conditions Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Polymyxins colistin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
525 None 70 None None 10.3390/ani11041005 H6KMQU4K Commensal escherichia coli antimicrobial resistance and multidrug-resistance dynamics during broiler growing period: Commercial vs. improved farm conditions None Experimental 100 None Production types CFC: Commercial farm conditions, IFC: Improved farm conditions IFC: Improved farm conditions CFC: Commercial farm conditions Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides azithromycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 5.00 None 1.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
526 None 70 None None 10.3390/ani11041005 H6KMQU4K Commensal escherichia coli antimicrobial resistance and multidrug-resistance dynamics during broiler growing period: Commercial vs. improved farm conditions None Experimental 100 None Production types CFC: Commercial farm conditions, IFC: Improved farm conditions IFC: Improved farm conditions CFC: Commercial farm conditions Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tigecycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
527 None 70 None None 10.3390/ani11041005 H6KMQU4K Commensal escherichia coli antimicrobial resistance and multidrug-resistance dynamics during broiler growing period: Commercial vs. improved farm conditions None Experimental 100 None Production types CFC: Commercial farm conditions, IFC: Improved farm conditions IFC: Improved farm conditions CFC: Commercial farm conditions Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 65.00 None 75.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
528 None 70 None None 10.3390/ani11041005 H6KMQU4K Commensal escherichia coli antimicrobial resistance and multidrug-resistance dynamics during broiler growing period: Commercial vs. improved farm conditions None Experimental 100 None Production types CFC: Commercial farm conditions, IFC: Improved farm conditions IFC: Improved farm conditions CFC: Commercial farm conditions Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 55.00 None 60.00 None 20 20 None None None None None
529 None 46 None None 10.1371/journal.pone.0227725 N9IRTXW9 Detection and characterization of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae from the gut of healthy chickens, Gallus gallus domesticus in rural Nepal: Dominance of CTX-M-15-non-ST131 Escherichia coli clones None Observational 101 None Production type broiler vs. backyard Backyard chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 36.40 None 62.50 None 66 47 None None None None None
530 None 46 None None 10.1371/journal.pone.0227725 N9IRTXW9 Detection and characterization of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae from the gut of healthy chickens, Gallus gallus domesticus in rural Nepal: Dominance of CTX-M-15-non-ST131 Escherichia coli clones None Observational 101 None Production type broiler vs. backyard Backyard chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 56.50 None 56.30 None 66 47 None None None None None
531 None 46 None None 10.1371/journal.pone.0227725 N9IRTXW9 Detection and characterization of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae from the gut of healthy chickens, Gallus gallus domesticus in rural Nepal: Dominance of CTX-M-15-non-ST131 Escherichia coli clones None Observational 101 None Production type broiler vs. backyard Backyard chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 50.00 None 31.80 None 66 47 None None None None None
532 None 46 None None 10.1371/journal.pone.0227725 N9IRTXW9 Detection and characterization of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae from the gut of healthy chickens, Gallus gallus domesticus in rural Nepal: Dominance of CTX-M-15-non-ST131 Escherichia coli clones None Observational 101 None Production type broiler vs. backyard Backyard chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 27.30 None 25.00 None 66 47 None None None None None
533 None 46 None None 10.1371/journal.pone.0227725 N9IRTXW9 Detection and characterization of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae from the gut of healthy chickens, Gallus gallus domesticus in rural Nepal: Dominance of CTX-M-15-non-ST131 Escherichia coli clones None Observational 101 None Production type broiler vs. backyard Backyard chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 36.40 None 43.80 None 66 47 None None None None None
534 None 46 None None 10.1371/journal.pone.0227725 N9IRTXW9 Detection and characterization of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae from the gut of healthy chickens, Gallus gallus domesticus in rural Nepal: Dominance of CTX-M-15-non-ST131 Escherichia coli clones None Observational 101 None Production type broiler vs. backyard Backyard chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides amikacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 6.30 None 13.60 None 66 47 None None None None None
535 None 46 None None 10.1371/journal.pone.0227725 N9IRTXW9 Detection and characterization of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae from the gut of healthy chickens, Gallus gallus domesticus in rural Nepal: Dominance of CTX-M-15-non-ST131 Escherichia coli clones None Observational 101 None Production type broiler vs. backyard Backyard chickens Broiler chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 18.20 None 12.50 None 66 47 None None None None None
536 None 73 None None 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104755 XMZUGDDF Differences in antimicrobial resistance of commensal Escherichia coli isolated from caecal contents of organically and conventionally raised broilers in Austria, 2010-2014 and 2016 None Observational 102 None Production type conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 33.30 None 69.10 None 142 820 None None None None None
537 None 73 None None 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104755 XMZUGDDF Differences in antimicrobial resistance of commensal Escherichia coli isolated from caecal contents of organically and conventionally raised broilers in Austria, 2010-2014 and 2016 None Observational 102 None Production type conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 33.70 None 67.40 None 142 820 None None None None None
538 None 73 None None 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104755 XMZUGDDF Differences in antimicrobial resistance of commensal Escherichia coli isolated from caecal contents of organically and conventionally raised broilers in Austria, 2010-2014 and 2016 None Observational 102 None Production type conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 26.70 None 39.90 None 142 820 None None None None None
539 None 73 None None 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104755 XMZUGDDF Differences in antimicrobial resistance of commensal Escherichia coli isolated from caecal contents of organically and conventionally raised broilers in Austria, 2010-2014 and 2016 None Observational 102 None Production type conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 27.60 None 25.90 None 142 820 None None None None None
540 None 73 None None 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104755 XMZUGDDF Differences in antimicrobial resistance of commensal Escherichia coli isolated from caecal contents of organically and conventionally raised broilers in Austria, 2010-2014 and 2016 None Observational 102 None Production type conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 19.00 None 33.80 None 142 820 None None None None None
541 None 73 None None 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104755 XMZUGDDF Differences in antimicrobial resistance of commensal Escherichia coli isolated from caecal contents of organically and conventionally raised broilers in Austria, 2010-2014 and 2016 None Observational 102 None Production type conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 12.80 None 24.90 None 142 820 None None None None None
542 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 103 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tigecycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 29.30 None 10.30 None 27 33 None None None None None
543 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 103 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Polymyxins colistin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 27 33 None None None None None
544 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 103 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Carbapenems meropenem None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 27 33 None None None None None
546 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 103 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftazidime None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 8.60 None 31.00 None 27 33 None None None None None
545 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 103 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 29.30 None 51.00 None 27 33 None None None None None
547 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 103 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 72.40 None 84.50 None 27 33 None None None None None
548 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 103 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 46.60 None 56.90 None 27 33 None None None None None
549 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 103 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 39.70 None 58.60 None 27 33 None None None None None
550 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 103 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 86.20 None 77.60 None 27 33 None None None None None
551 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 103 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides azithromycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 29.30 None 6.90 None 27 33 None None None None None
552 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 103 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 32.80 None 12.10 None 27 33 None None None None None
553 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 103 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 82.80 None 72.40 None 27 33 None None None None None
554 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 103 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 46.60 None 67.20 None 27 33 None None None None None
555 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 103 None Production type Conventional vs organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 67.20 None 63.80 None 27 33 None None None None None
556 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 104 None Production type Conventional vs. ABF Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tigecycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 20.70 None 10.30 None 33 33 None None None None None
557 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 104 None Production type Conventional vs. ABF Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Polymyxins colistin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 33 33 None None None None None
558 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 104 None Production type Conventional vs. ABF Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Carbapenems meropenem None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 33 33 None None None None None
559 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 104 None Production type Conventional vs. ABF Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 36.20 None 51.70 None 33 33 None None None None None
560 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 104 None Production type Conventional vs. ABF Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftazidime None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 10.30 None 31.00 None 33 33 None None None None None
561 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 104 None Production type Conventional vs. ABF Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 70.70 None 84.50 None 33 33 None None None None None
562 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 104 None Production type Conventional vs. ABF Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 58.60 None 56.90 None 33 33 None None None None None
564 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 104 None Production type Conventional vs. ABF Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 41.40 None 58.60 None 33 33 None None None None None
565 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 104 None Production type Conventional vs. ABF Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides azithromycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 10.90 None 6.90 None 33 33 None None None None None
566 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 104 None Production type Conventional vs. ABF Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 22.40 None 12.10 None 33 33 None None None None None
567 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 104 None Production type Conventional vs. ABF Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 81.00 None 72.40 None 33 33 None None None None None
568 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 104 None Production type Conventional vs. ABF Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 37.90 None 67.20 None 33 33 None None None None None
569 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 104 None Production type Conventional vs. ABF Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Trimethoprim and derivatives trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 62.10 None 63.80 None 33 33 None None None None None
431 None 93 None None 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.020 5W3UFYBM Resistance to three antimicrobial agents of Campylobacter isolated from organically- and intensively-reared chickens purchased from retail outlets None Observational 85 None Production Type POC, pre-packaged supermarket organically-reared chicken vs. PIC, pre-packaged supermarket intensively-reared chicken Pre-packaged supermarket organically-reared chicken Pre-packaged supermarket intensively-reared chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter None None None None None None None None 0.00 None 8.70 None 30 30 None None None None None
503 None 107 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101118 AUYNDKMX Effect of inclusion of micronized camelina, sunflower, and flax seeds in the broiler chicken diet on performance productivity, nutrient utilization, and intestinal microbial populations None Experimental 96 None Treatement Control − diet without micronized oilseeds. CAM.IR − diet with 15% of micronized camelina seeds. Diet with 15% of micronized camelina seeds. (Feed additive) No feed additive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
507 None 107 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101118 AUYNDKMX Effect of inclusion of micronized camelina, sunflower, and flax seeds in the broiler chicken diet on performance productivity, nutrient utilization, and intestinal microbial populations None Experimental 97 None Treatment Control − diet without micronized oilseeds vs. FLA.IR − with 15% of micronized flax seeds. FLA.IR − with 15% of micronized flax seeds (Feed additive) No feed additive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 33.00 None 13.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
512 None 107 None None 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101118 AUYNDKMX Effect of inclusion of micronized camelina, sunflower, and flax seeds in the broiler chicken diet on performance productivity, nutrient utilization, and intestinal microbial populations None Experimental 98 None Treatment Control − diet without micronized oilseeds. vs SUN.IR − diet with 15% of micronized sunflower seeds. SUN.IR − diet with 15% of micronized sunflower seeds. (feed additive) No feed additive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus None None None None None None None None 30.00 None 23.00 None 50 50 None None None None None
570 None 43 None None 10.1186/s40168-021-01136-4 FQPLYEVH Longitudinal study on the effects of growth-promoting and therapeutic antibiotics on the dynamics of chicken cloacal and litter microbiomes and resistomes None Observational 105 None Treatment NAB, no antibiotics vs. bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) at 27 days NAB, no antibiotics bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 10.90 None 17.80 None 113 96 None None None None None
571 None 43 None None 10.1186/s40168-021-01136-4 FQPLYEVH Longitudinal study on the effects of growth-promoting and therapeutic antibiotics on the dynamics of chicken cloacal and litter microbiomes and resistomes None Observational 105 None Treatment NAB, no antibiotics vs. bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) at 27 days NAB, no antibiotics bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 90.60 None 92.20 None 113 96 None None None None None
572 None 43 None None 10.1186/s40168-021-01136-4 FQPLYEVH Longitudinal study on the effects of growth-promoting and therapeutic antibiotics on the dynamics of chicken cloacal and litter microbiomes and resistomes None Observational 105 None Treatment NAB, no antibiotics vs. bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) at 27 days NAB, no antibiotics bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 113 96 None None None None None
573 None 43 None None 10.1186/s40168-021-01136-4 FQPLYEVH Longitudinal study on the effects of growth-promoting and therapeutic antibiotics on the dynamics of chicken cloacal and litter microbiomes and resistomes None Observational 105 None Treatment NAB, no antibiotics vs. bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) at 27 days NAB, no antibiotics bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 22.40 None 20.90 None 113 96 None None None None None
574 None 43 None None 10.1186/s40168-021-01136-4 FQPLYEVH Longitudinal study on the effects of growth-promoting and therapeutic antibiotics on the dynamics of chicken cloacal and litter microbiomes and resistomes None Observational 105 None Treatment NAB, no antibiotics vs. bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) at 27 days NAB, no antibiotics bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 29.50 None 34.10 None 113 96 None None None None None
575 None 43 None None 10.1186/s40168-021-01136-4 FQPLYEVH Longitudinal study on the effects of growth-promoting and therapeutic antibiotics on the dynamics of chicken cloacal and litter microbiomes and resistomes None Observational 105 None Treatment NAB, no antibiotics vs. bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) at 27 days NAB, no antibiotics bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.40 None 19.30 None 113 96 None None None None None
576 None 43 None None 10.1186/s40168-021-01136-4 FQPLYEVH Longitudinal study on the effects of growth-promoting and therapeutic antibiotics on the dynamics of chicken cloacal and litter microbiomes and resistomes None Observational 105 None Treatment NAB, no antibiotics vs. bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) at 27 days NAB, no antibiotics bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 77.50 None 91.40 None 113 96 None None None None None
577 None 43 None None 10.1186/s40168-021-01136-4 FQPLYEVH Longitudinal study on the effects of growth-promoting and therapeutic antibiotics on the dynamics of chicken cloacal and litter microbiomes and resistomes None Observational 105 None Treatment NAB, no antibiotics vs. bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) at 27 days NAB, no antibiotics bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 65.80 None 68.90 None 113 96 None None None None None
578 None 43 None None 10.1186/s40168-021-01136-4 FQPLYEVH Longitudinal study on the effects of growth-promoting and therapeutic antibiotics on the dynamics of chicken cloacal and litter microbiomes and resistomes None Observational 105 None Treatment NAB, no antibiotics vs. bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) at 27 days NAB, no antibiotics bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Carbapenems meropenem None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 113 96 None None None None None
579 None 43 None None 10.1186/s40168-021-01136-4 FQPLYEVH Longitudinal study on the effects of growth-promoting and therapeutic antibiotics on the dynamics of chicken cloacal and litter microbiomes and resistomes None Observational 105 None Treatment NAB, no antibiotics vs. bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) at 27 days NAB, no antibiotics bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Polymyxins colistin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 17.80 None 0.00 None 113 96 None None None None None
580 None 43 None None 10.1186/s40168-021-01136-4 FQPLYEVH Longitudinal study on the effects of growth-promoting and therapeutic antibiotics on the dynamics of chicken cloacal and litter microbiomes and resistomes None Observational 105 None Treatment NAB, no antibiotics vs. bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) at 27 days NAB, no antibiotics bacitracin methylene disalicylate (BMD) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Other antibacterials bacitracin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 86.80 None 89.90 None 113 96 None None None None None
583 None 48 None None 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02766 86FHE6RF Genomic and Functional Characterization of Poultry Escherichia coli From India Revealed Diverse Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamase-Producing Lineages With Shared Virulence Profiles None Observational 106 None Production type Free-range chicken vs. broiler chicken Free range chicken Broiler chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 11 12 None None None None None
581 None 48 None None 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02766 86FHE6RF Genomic and Functional Characterization of Poultry Escherichia coli From India Revealed Diverse Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamase-Producing Lineages With Shared Virulence Profiles None Observational 106 None Production type Free-range chicken vs. broiler chicken Free range chicken Broiler chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 25.00 None 11 12 None None None None None
582 None 48 None None 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02766 86FHE6RF Genomic and Functional Characterization of Poultry Escherichia coli From India Revealed Diverse Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamase-Producing Lineages With Shared Virulence Profiles None Observational 106 None Production type Free-range chicken vs. broiler chicken Free range chicken Broiler chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 0.00 None 7.90 None 11 12 None None None None None
584 None 48 None None 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02766 86FHE6RF Genomic and Functional Characterization of Poultry Escherichia coli From India Revealed Diverse Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamase-Producing Lineages With Shared Virulence Profiles None Observational 106 None Production type Free-range chicken vs. broiler chicken Free range chicken Broiler chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides combinations of sulfonamides and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 90.10 None 42.00 None 11 12 None None None None None
585 None 48 None None 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02766 86FHE6RF Genomic and Functional Characterization of Poultry Escherichia coli From India Revealed Diverse Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamase-Producing Lineages With Shared Virulence Profiles None Observational 106 None Production type Free-range chicken vs. broiler chicken Free range chicken Broiler chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides combinations of sulfonamides and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 90.10 None 42.00 None 11 12 None None None None None
586 None 48 None None 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02766 86FHE6RF Genomic and Functional Characterization of Poultry Escherichia coli From India Revealed Diverse Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamase-Producing Lineages With Shared Virulence Profiles None Observational 106 None Production type Free-range chicken vs. broiler chicken Free range chicken Broiler chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 63.80 None 57.90 None 11 12 None None None None None
587 None 48 None None 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02766 86FHE6RF Genomic and Functional Characterization of Poultry Escherichia coli From India Revealed Diverse Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamase-Producing Lineages With Shared Virulence Profiles None Observational 106 None Production type Free-range chicken vs. broiler chicken Free range chicken Broiler chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 9.00 None 25.30 None 11 12 None None None None None
588 None 48 None None 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02766 86FHE6RF Genomic and Functional Characterization of Poultry Escherichia coli From India Revealed Diverse Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamase-Producing Lineages With Shared Virulence Profiles None Observational 106 None Production type Free-range chicken vs. broiler chicken Free range chicken Broiler chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 99.40 None 99.40 None 11 12 None None None None None
589 None 48 None None 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02766 86FHE6RF Genomic and Functional Characterization of Poultry Escherichia coli From India Revealed Diverse Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamase-Producing Lineages With Shared Virulence Profiles None Observational 106 None Production type Free-range chicken vs. broiler chicken Free range chicken Broiler chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 11 12 None None None None None
590 None 48 None None 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02766 86FHE6RF Genomic and Functional Characterization of Poultry Escherichia coli From India Revealed Diverse Extended-Spectrum beta-Lactamase-Producing Lineages With Shared Virulence Profiles None Observational 106 None Production type Free-range chicken vs. broiler chicken Free range chicken Broiler chicken Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 100.00 None 82.70 None 11 12 None None None None None
595 None 50 None None 10.3390/antibiotics9100701 X9THLGCY Antibiogram profiles and risk factors for multidrug resistance of salmonella enterica recovered from village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus linnaeus) and other environmental sources in the central and Southern Peninsular Malaysia None Observational 107 None Production Type Free- range vs. Intensive Free Range Intensive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 14.60 None 8.90 None 22 12 None None None None None
592 None 50 None None 10.3390/antibiotics9100701 X9THLGCY Antibiogram profiles and risk factors for multidrug resistance of salmonella enterica recovered from village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus linnaeus) and other environmental sources in the central and Southern Peninsular Malaysia None Observational 107 None Production Type Free- range vs. Intensive Free Range Intensive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella None True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 14.60 None 11.80 None 22 12 None None None None None
594 None 50 None None 10.3390/antibiotics9100701 X9THLGCY Antibiogram profiles and risk factors for multidrug resistance of salmonella enterica recovered from village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus linnaeus) and other environmental sources in the central and Southern Peninsular Malaysia None Observational 107 None Production Type Free- range vs. Intensive Free Range Intensive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Salmonella None True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 11.60 None 5.90 None 22 12 None None None None None
593 None 50 None None 10.3390/antibiotics9100701 X9THLGCY Antibiogram profiles and risk factors for multidrug resistance of salmonella enterica recovered from village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus linnaeus) and other environmental sources in the central and Southern Peninsular Malaysia None Observational 107 None Production Type Free- range vs. Intensive Free Range Intensive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Salmonella None True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 8.90 None 6.00 None 22 12 None None None None None
614 None 55 None None 10.4315/JFP-20-150 RG7N9G3X Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia coli from Retail Poultry Meats in Korea None Observational 109 None Production Type Organic/antibiotic (OAF) free vs. conventional (CONV) Organic/ABF (OAF) Conventional (CONV) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 14.20 None 6.20 None 46 705 None None None None None
615 None 55 None None 10.4315/JFP-20-150 RG7N9G3X Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia coli from Retail Poultry Meats in Korea None Observational 109 None Production Type Organic/antibiotic (OAF) free vs. conventional (CONV) Organic/ABF (OAF) Conventional (CONV) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 85.50 None 77.90 None 46 705 None None None None None
616 None 55 None None 10.4315/JFP-20-150 RG7N9G3X Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia coli from Retail Poultry Meats in Korea None Observational 109 None Production Type Organic/antibiotic (OAF) free vs. conventional (CONV) Organic/ABF (OAF) Conventional (CONV) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftazidime None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 14.20 None 6.90 None 46 705 None None None None None
617 None 55 None None 10.4315/JFP-20-150 RG7N9G3X Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia coli from Retail Poultry Meats in Korea None Observational 109 None Production Type Organic/antibiotic (OAF) free vs. conventional (CONV) Organic/ABF (OAF) Conventional (CONV) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 61.10 None 52.70 None 46 705 None None None None None
618 None 55 None None 10.4315/JFP-20-150 RG7N9G3X Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia coli from Retail Poultry Meats in Korea None Observational 109 None Production Type Organic/antibiotic (OAF) free vs. conventional (CONV) Organic/ABF (OAF) Conventional (CONV) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 72.60 None 69.20 None 46 705 None None None None None
619 None 55 None None 10.4315/JFP-20-150 RG7N9G3X Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia coli from Retail Poultry Meats in Korea None Observational 109 None Production Type Organic/antibiotic (OAF) free vs. conventional (CONV) Organic/ABF (OAF) Conventional (CONV) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Polymyxins colistin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 0.00 None 1.50 None 46 705 None None None None None
620 None 55 None None 10.4315/JFP-20-150 RG7N9G3X Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia coli from Retail Poultry Meats in Korea None Observational 109 None Production Type Organic/antibiotic (OAF) free vs. conventional (CONV) Organic/ABF (OAF) Conventional (CONV) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 19.50 None 16.50 None 46 705 None None None None None
621 None 55 None None 10.4315/JFP-20-150 RG7N9G3X Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia coli from Retail Poultry Meats in Korea None Observational 109 None Production Type Organic/antibiotic (OAF) free vs. conventional (CONV) Organic/ABF (OAF) Conventional (CONV) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 14.20 None 6.20 None 46 705 None None None None None
622 None 55 None None 10.4315/JFP-20-150 RG7N9G3X Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia coli from Retail Poultry Meats in Korea None Observational 109 None Production Type Organic/antibiotic (OAF) free vs. conventional (CONV) Organic/ABF (OAF) Conventional (CONV) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Fourth-generation cephalosporins cefepime None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 3.10 None 1.90 None 46 705 None None None None None
623 None 55 None None 10.4315/JFP-20-150 RG7N9G3X Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia coli from Retail Poultry Meats in Korea None Observational 109 None Production Type Organic/antibiotic (OAF) free vs. conventional (CONV) Organic/ABF (OAF) Conventional (CONV) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 19.50 None 18.60 None 46 705 None None None None None
624 None 55 None None 10.4315/JFP-20-150 RG7N9G3X Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia coli from Retail Poultry Meats in Korea None Observational 109 None Production Type Organic/antibiotic (OAF) free vs. conventional (CONV) Organic/ABF (OAF) Conventional (CONV) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 86.30 None 86.20 None 46 705 None None None None None
625 None 55 None None 10.4315/JFP-20-150 RG7N9G3X Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia coli from Retail Poultry Meats in Korea None Observational 109 None Production Type Organic/antibiotic (OAF) free vs. conventional (CONV) Organic/ABF (OAF) Conventional (CONV) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 38.90 None 42.10 None 46 705 None None None None None
626 None 55 None None 10.4315/JFP-20-150 RG7N9G3X Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia coli from Retail Poultry Meats in Korea None Observational 109 None Production Type Organic/antibiotic (OAF) free vs. conventional (CONV) Organic/ABF (OAF) Conventional (CONV) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 47.30 None 60.40 None 46 705 None None None None None
627 None 55 None None 10.4315/JFP-20-150 RG7N9G3X Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia coli from Retail Poultry Meats in Korea None Observational 109 None Production Type Organic/antibiotic (OAF) free vs. conventional (CONV) Organic/ABF (OAF) Conventional (CONV) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 75.20 None 70.20 None 46 705 None None None None None
628 None 55 None None 10.4315/JFP-20-150 RG7N9G3X Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia coli from Retail Poultry Meats in Korea None Observational 109 None Production Type Organic/antibiotic (OAF) free vs. conventional (CONV) Organic/ABF (OAF) Conventional (CONV) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Carbapenems meropenem None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 46 705 None None None None None
223 None 57 None None 10.1111/zph.12381 GUXG2A74 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks None Observational 51 None Production Type Smallholder flocks vs. CIPARS flocks (conventional) Smallholder flocks Conventional flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli True None None None None None None 3.70 None 8.00 None 1022 58 None None None None None
629 None 57 None None 10.1111/zph.12381 GUXG2A74 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks None Observational 51 None Production Type Smallholder flocks vs. CIPARS flocks (conventional) Smallholder flocks Conventional flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 3.30 None 5.10 None 1022 58 None None None None None
630 None 57 None None 10.1111/zph.12381 GUXG2A74 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks None Observational 51 None Production Type Smallholder flocks vs. CIPARS flocks (conventional) Smallholder flocks Conventional flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 3.40 None 5.10 None 1022 58 None None None None None
631 None 57 None None 10.1111/zph.12381 GUXG2A74 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks None Observational 51 None Production Type Smallholder flocks vs. CIPARS flocks (conventional) Smallholder flocks Conventional flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 14.00 None 36.20 None 1022 58 None None None None None
632 None 57 None None 10.1111/zph.12381 GUXG2A74 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks None Observational 51 None Production Type Smallholder flocks vs. CIPARS flocks (conventional) Smallholder flocks Conventional flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides azithromycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.40 None 0.40 None 1022 58 None None None None None
633 None 57 None None 10.1111/zph.12381 GUXG2A74 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks None Observational 51 None Production Type Smallholder flocks vs. CIPARS flocks (conventional) Smallholder flocks Conventional flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 3.60 None 7.80 None 1022 58 None None None None None
634 None 57 None None 10.1111/zph.12381 GUXG2A74 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks None Observational 51 None Production Type Smallholder flocks vs. CIPARS flocks (conventional) Smallholder flocks Conventional flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 9.30 None 12.40 None 1022 58 None None None None None
635 None 57 None None 10.1111/zph.12381 GUXG2A74 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks None Observational 51 None Production Type Smallholder flocks vs. CIPARS flocks (conventional) Smallholder flocks Conventional flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 2.20 None 5.30 None 1022 58 None None None None None
636 None 57 None None 10.1111/zph.12381 GUXG2A74 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks None Observational 51 None Production Type Smallholder flocks vs. CIPARS flocks (conventional) Smallholder flocks Conventional flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 20.50 None 46.50 None 1022 58 None None None None None
637 None 57 None None 10.1111/zph.12381 GUXG2A74 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks None Observational 51 None Production Type Smallholder flocks vs. CIPARS flocks (conventional) Smallholder flocks Conventional flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 4.40 None 27.10 None 1022 58 None None None None None
638 None 57 None None 10.1111/zph.12381 GUXG2A74 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks None Observational 51 None Production Type Smallholder flocks vs. CIPARS flocks (conventional) Smallholder flocks Conventional flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 1.00 None 5.20 None 1022 58 None None None None None
639 None 57 None None 10.1111/zph.12381 GUXG2A74 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks None Observational 51 None Production Type Smallholder flocks vs. CIPARS flocks (conventional) Smallholder flocks Conventional flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 36.80 None 56.80 None 1022 58 None None None None None
640 None 57 None None 10.1111/zph.12381 GUXG2A74 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance among Escherichia coli and Salmonella in Ontario smallholder chicken flocks None Observational 51 None Production Type Smallholder flocks vs. CIPARS flocks (conventional) Smallholder flocks Conventional flocks Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 1022 58 None None None None None
641 None 58 None None LXMBIQNI Risk factors for antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter spp. isolated from raw poultry meat in Switzerland None Observational 52 None Production Type Conventional vs, animal friendly Animal-friendly Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 2.90 None 8.80 None 37 50 None None None None None
642 None 58 None None LXMBIQNI Risk factors for antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter spp. isolated from raw poultry meat in Switzerland None Observational 52 None Production Type Conventional vs, animal friendly Animal-friendly Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 28.40 None 31.70 None 37 50 None None None None None
644 None 58 None None LXMBIQNI Risk factors for antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter spp. isolated from raw poultry meat in Switzerland None Observational 52 None Production Type Conventional vs, animal friendly Animal-friendly Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 0.00 None 2.10 None 37 50 None None None None None
645 None 58 None None LXMBIQNI Risk factors for antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter spp. isolated from raw poultry meat in Switzerland None Observational 52 None Production Type Conventional vs, animal friendly Animal-friendly Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 2.10 None 10.30 None 37 50 None None None None None
646 None 58 None None LXMBIQNI Risk factors for antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter spp. isolated from raw poultry meat in Switzerland None Observational 52 None Production Type Conventional vs, animal friendly Animal-friendly Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 37 50 None None None None None
647 None 58 None None LXMBIQNI Risk factors for antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter spp. isolated from raw poultry meat in Switzerland None Observational 52 None Production Type Conventional vs, animal friendly Animal-friendly Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 5.40 None 19.10 None 37 50 None None None None None
648 None 58 None None LXMBIQNI Risk factors for antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter spp. isolated from raw poultry meat in Switzerland None Observational 52 None Production Type Conventional vs, animal friendly Animal-friendly Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 3.30 None 19.40 None 37 50 None None None None None
650 None 62 None None 10.1128/AEM.01559-19 CR9YHPZC Chicken Meat-Associated Enterococci: Influence of Agricultural Antibiotic Use and Connection to the Clinic None Observational 110 None Production Type Conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Enterococcus faecium None None None None None None None 64.00 None 79.40 None 19 60 None None None None None
652 None 62 None None 10.1128/AEM.01559-19 CR9YHPZC Chicken Meat-Associated Enterococci: Influence of Agricultural Antibiotic Use and Connection to the Clinic None Observational 110 None Production Type Conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Enterococcus faecium None None None None None None None 32.50 None 37.30 None 19 60 None None None None None
658 None 62 None None 10.1128/AEM.01559-19 CR9YHPZC Chicken Meat-Associated Enterococci: Influence of Agricultural Antibiotic Use and Connection to the Clinic None Observational 110 None Production Type Conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Other antibacterials daptomycin None Enterococcus faecium None None None None None None None 0.00 None 4.80 None 19 60 None None None None None
654 None 62 None None 10.1128/AEM.01559-19 CR9YHPZC Chicken Meat-Associated Enterococci: Influence of Agricultural Antibiotic Use and Connection to the Clinic None Observational 110 None Production Type Conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Enterococcus faecium None None None None None None None 16.20 None 35.50 None 19 60 None None None None None
655 None 62 None None 10.1128/AEM.01559-19 CR9YHPZC Chicken Meat-Associated Enterococci: Influence of Agricultural Antibiotic Use and Connection to the Clinic None Observational 110 None Production Type Conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Enterococcus faecium None None None None None None None 16.20 None 32.50 None 19 60 None None None None None
659 None 62 None None 10.1128/AEM.01559-19 CR9YHPZC Chicken Meat-Associated Enterococci: Influence of Agricultural Antibiotic Use and Connection to the Clinic None Observational 110 None Production Type Conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Lincosamides lincomycin None Enterococcus faecium None None None None None None None 85.50 None 94.70 None 19 60 None None None None None
656 None 62 None None 10.1128/AEM.01559-19 CR9YHPZC Chicken Meat-Associated Enterococci: Influence of Agricultural Antibiotic Use and Connection to the Clinic None Observational 110 None Production Type Conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Combinations of antibacterials penicillins, combinations with other antibacterials None Enterococcus faecium True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 5.70 None 3.10 None 19 60 None None None None None
660 None 62 None None 10.1128/AEM.01559-19 CR9YHPZC Chicken Meat-Associated Enterococci: Influence of Agricultural Antibiotic Use and Connection to the Clinic None Observational 110 None Production Type Conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tigecycline None Enterococcus faecium None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 19 60 None None None None None
653 None 62 None None 10.1128/AEM.01559-19 CR9YHPZC Chicken Meat-Associated Enterococci: Influence of Agricultural Antibiotic Use and Connection to the Clinic None Observational 110 None Production Type Conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides tylosin None Enterococcus faecium None None None None None None None 16.20 None 53.90 None 19 60 None None None None None
661 None 62 None None 10.1128/AEM.01559-19 CR9YHPZC Chicken Meat-Associated Enterococci: Influence of Agricultural Antibiotic Use and Connection to the Clinic None Observational 110 None Production Type Conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Glycopeptide antibacterials vancomycin None Enterococcus faecium None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 19 60 None None None None None
649 None 62 None None 10.1128/AEM.01559-19 CR9YHPZC Chicken Meat-Associated Enterococci: Influence of Agricultural Antibiotic Use and Connection to the Clinic None Observational 110 None Production Type Conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Streptogramins virginiamycin None Enterococcus faecium None None None None None None None 85.50 None 94.70 None 19 60 None None None None None
664 None 63 None None 10.1089/fpd.2021.0001 6XRMGZNS Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. isolates from broiler chicken meat supply chain in Maputo, Mozambique None Observational 111 None Retail Types Informal Markets vs. Supermarkets Informal markets Supermarkets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 49.70 None 62.30 None 8 8 None None None None None
601 None 50 None None 10.3390/antibiotics9100701 X9THLGCY Antibiogram profiles and risk factors for multidrug resistance of salmonella enterica recovered from village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus linnaeus) and other environmental sources in the central and Southern Peninsular Malaysia None Observational 107 None Production Type Free- range vs. Intensive Free Range Intensive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 0.00 None 3.00 None 22 12 None None None None None
600 None 50 None None 10.3390/antibiotics9100701 X9THLGCY Antibiogram profiles and risk factors for multidrug resistance of salmonella enterica recovered from village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus linnaeus) and other environmental sources in the central and Southern Peninsular Malaysia None Observational 107 None Production Type Free- range vs. Intensive Free Range Intensive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 2.90 None 0.00 None 22 12 None None None None None
598 None 50 None None 10.3390/antibiotics9100701 X9THLGCY Antibiogram profiles and risk factors for multidrug resistance of salmonella enterica recovered from village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus linnaeus) and other environmental sources in the central and Southern Peninsular Malaysia None Observational 107 None Production Type Free- range vs. Intensive Free Range Intensive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella None True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 2.90 None 0.00 None 22 12 None None None None None
597 None 50 None None 10.3390/antibiotics9100701 X9THLGCY Antibiogram profiles and risk factors for multidrug resistance of salmonella enterica recovered from village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus linnaeus) and other environmental sources in the central and Southern Peninsular Malaysia None Observational 107 None Production Type Free- range vs. Intensive Free Range Intensive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 5.90 None 0.00 None 22 12 None None None None None
596 None 50 None None 10.3390/antibiotics9100701 X9THLGCY Antibiogram profiles and risk factors for multidrug resistance of salmonella enterica recovered from village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus linnaeus) and other environmental sources in the central and Southern Peninsular Malaysia None Observational 107 None Production Type Free- range vs. Intensive Free Range Intensive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella None True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 5.90 None 5.90 None 22 12 None None None None None
599 None 50 None None 10.3390/antibiotics9100701 X9THLGCY Antibiogram profiles and risk factors for multidrug resistance of salmonella enterica recovered from village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus linnaeus) and other environmental sources in the central and Southern Peninsular Malaysia None Observational 107 None Production Type Free- range vs. Intensive Free Range Intensive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Salmonella None True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 22 12 None None None None None
613 None 50 None None 10.3390/antibiotics9100701 X9THLGCY Antibiogram profiles and risk factors for multidrug resistance of salmonella enterica recovered from village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus linnaeus) and other environmental sources in the central and Southern Peninsular Malaysia None Observational 108 None Production type semi-intensive vs. intesive Semi-Intensive (SI) Intensive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella None True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 12 12 None None None None None
607 None 50 None None 10.3390/antibiotics9100701 X9THLGCY Antibiogram profiles and risk factors for multidrug resistance of salmonella enterica recovered from village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus linnaeus) and other environmental sources in the central and Southern Peninsular Malaysia None Observational 108 None Production type semi-intensive vs. intesive Semi-Intensive (SI) Intensive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 0.00 None 8.90 None 12 12 None None None None None
612 None 50 None None 10.3390/antibiotics9100701 X9THLGCY Antibiogram profiles and risk factors for multidrug resistance of salmonella enterica recovered from village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus linnaeus) and other environmental sources in the central and Southern Peninsular Malaysia None Observational 108 None Production type semi-intensive vs. intesive Semi-Intensive (SI) Intensive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 12 12 None None None None None
610 None 50 None None 10.3390/antibiotics9100701 X9THLGCY Antibiogram profiles and risk factors for multidrug resistance of salmonella enterica recovered from village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus linnaeus) and other environmental sources in the central and Southern Peninsular Malaysia None Observational 108 None Production type semi-intensive vs. intesive Semi-Intensive (SI) Intensive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 2.90 None 0.00 None 12 12 None None None None None
609 None 50 None None 10.3390/antibiotics9100701 X9THLGCY Antibiogram profiles and risk factors for multidrug resistance of salmonella enterica recovered from village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus linnaeus) and other environmental sources in the central and Southern Peninsular Malaysia None Observational 108 None Production type semi-intensive vs. intesive Semi-Intensive (SI) Intensive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 2.90 None 0.00 None 12 12 None None None None None
608 None 50 None None 10.3390/antibiotics9100701 X9THLGCY Antibiogram profiles and risk factors for multidrug resistance of salmonella enterica recovered from village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus linnaeus) and other environmental sources in the central and Southern Peninsular Malaysia None Observational 108 None Production type semi-intensive vs. intesive Semi-Intensive (SI) Intensive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 2.90 None 5.90 None 12 12 None None None None None
611 None 50 None None 10.3390/antibiotics9100701 X9THLGCY Antibiogram profiles and risk factors for multidrug resistance of salmonella enterica recovered from village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus linnaeus) and other environmental sources in the central and Southern Peninsular Malaysia None Observational 108 None Production type semi-intensive vs. intesive Semi-Intensive (SI) Intensive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 2.90 None 0.00 None 12 12 None None None None None
604 None 50 None None 10.3390/antibiotics9100701 X9THLGCY Antibiogram profiles and risk factors for multidrug resistance of salmonella enterica recovered from village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus linnaeus) and other environmental sources in the central and Southern Peninsular Malaysia None Observational 108 None Production type semi-intensive vs. intesive Semi-Intensive (SI) Intensive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella None True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 2.90 None 11.80 None 12 12 None None None None None
606 None 50 None None 10.3390/antibiotics9100701 X9THLGCY Antibiogram profiles and risk factors for multidrug resistance of salmonella enterica recovered from village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus linnaeus) and other environmental sources in the central and Southern Peninsular Malaysia None Observational 108 None Production type semi-intensive vs. intesive Semi-Intensive (SI) Intensive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Salmonella None True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 8.90 None 5.90 None 12 12 None None None None None
602 None 50 None None 10.3390/antibiotics9100701 X9THLGCY Antibiogram profiles and risk factors for multidrug resistance of salmonella enterica recovered from village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus linnaeus) and other environmental sources in the central and Southern Peninsular Malaysia None Observational 108 None Production type semi-intensive vs. intesive Semi-Intensive (SI) Intensive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella None None None None None None None None 6.00 None 11.80 None 12 12 None None None None None
605 None 50 None None 10.3390/antibiotics9100701 X9THLGCY Antibiogram profiles and risk factors for multidrug resistance of salmonella enterica recovered from village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus linnaeus) and other environmental sources in the central and Southern Peninsular Malaysia None Observational 108 None Production type semi-intensive vs. intesive Semi-Intensive (SI) Intensive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Salmonella None True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 6.00 None 6.00 None 12 12 None None None None None
657 None 62 None None 10.1128/AEM.01559-19 CR9YHPZC Chicken Meat-Associated Enterococci: Influence of Agricultural Antibiotic Use and Connection to the Clinic None Observational 110 None Production Type Conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Enterococcus faecium None None None None None None None 0.00 None 2.20 None 19 60 None None None None None
662 None 62 None None 10.1128/AEM.01559-19 CR9YHPZC Chicken Meat-Associated Enterococci: Influence of Agricultural Antibiotic Use and Connection to the Clinic None Observational 110 None Production Type Conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Other antibacterials linezolid None Enterococcus faecium None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 19 60 None None None None None
651 None 62 None None 10.1128/AEM.01559-19 CR9YHPZC Chicken Meat-Associated Enterococci: Influence of Agricultural Antibiotic Use and Connection to the Clinic None Observational 110 None Production Type Conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antibiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Enterococcus faecium None None None None None None None 53.50 None 66.20 None 19 60 None None None None None
667 None 63 None None 10.1089/fpd.2021.0001 6XRMGZNS Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. isolates from broiler chicken meat supply chain in Maputo, Mozambique None Observational 111 None Retail Types Informal Markets vs. Supermarkets Informal markets Supermarkets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Campylobacter spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 12.70 None 24.90 None 8 8 None None None None None
666 None 63 None None 10.1089/fpd.2021.0001 6XRMGZNS Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. isolates from broiler chicken meat supply chain in Maputo, Mozambique None Observational 111 None Retail Types Informal Markets vs. Supermarkets Informal markets Supermarkets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Campylobacter spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 12.70 None 24.90 None 8 8 None None None None None
674 None 63 None None 10.1089/fpd.2021.0001 6XRMGZNS Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. isolates from broiler chicken meat supply chain in Maputo, Mozambique None Observational 111 None Retail Types Informal Markets vs. Supermarkets Informal markets Supermarkets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 49.70 None 24.90 None 8 8 None None None None None
672 None 63 None None 10.1089/fpd.2021.0001 6XRMGZNS Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. isolates from broiler chicken meat supply chain in Maputo, Mozambique None Observational 111 None Retail Types Informal Markets vs. Supermarkets Informal markets Supermarkets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines doxycycline None Campylobacter spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 87.40 None 100.00 None 8 8 None None None None None
673 None 63 None None 10.1089/fpd.2021.0001 6XRMGZNS Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. isolates from broiler chicken meat supply chain in Maputo, Mozambique None Observational 111 None Retail Types Informal Markets vs. Supermarkets Informal markets Supermarkets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 74.50 None 100.00 None 8 8 None None None None None
668 None 63 None None 10.1089/fpd.2021.0001 6XRMGZNS Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. isolates from broiler chicken meat supply chain in Maputo, Mozambique None Observational 111 None Retail Types Informal Markets vs. Supermarkets Informal markets Supermarkets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 62.60 None 74.90 None 8 8 None None None None None
669 None 63 None None 10.1089/fpd.2021.0001 6XRMGZNS Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. isolates from broiler chicken meat supply chain in Maputo, Mozambique None Observational 111 None Retail Types Informal Markets vs. Supermarkets Informal markets Supermarkets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Campylobacter spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 74.50 None 100.00 None 8 8 None None None None None
670 None 63 None None 10.1089/fpd.2021.0001 6XRMGZNS Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. isolates from broiler chicken meat supply chain in Maputo, Mozambique None Observational 111 None Retail Types Informal Markets vs. Supermarkets Informal markets Supermarkets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole None Campylobacter spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 49.70 None 74.90 None 8 8 None None None None None
671 None 63 None None 10.1089/fpd.2021.0001 6XRMGZNS Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. isolates from broiler chicken meat supply chain in Maputo, Mozambique None Observational 111 None Retail Types Informal Markets vs. Supermarkets Informal markets Supermarkets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 8 8 None None None None None
677 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 112 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (ii) basal diet with 55 ppm of BAC methylene disalicylate Basal diet with 55 ppm of BAC methylene disalicylate; (CIN) Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 48.20 None 35.50 None 320 320 None None None None None
678 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 112 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (ii) basal diet with 55 ppm of BAC methylene disalicylate Basal diet with 55 ppm of BAC methylene disalicylate; (CIN) Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 50.10 None 39.40 None 320 320 None None None None None
679 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 112 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (ii) basal diet with 55 ppm of BAC methylene disalicylate Basal diet with 55 ppm of BAC methylene disalicylate; (CIN) Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 50.30 None 39.60 None 320 320 None None None None None
680 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 112 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (ii) basal diet with 55 ppm of BAC methylene disalicylate Basal diet with 55 ppm of BAC methylene disalicylate; (CIN) Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 58.50 None 58.50 None 320 320 None None None None None
681 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 112 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (ii) basal diet with 55 ppm of BAC methylene disalicylate Basal diet with 55 ppm of BAC methylene disalicylate; (CIN) Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 50.30 None 35.70 None 320 320 None None None None None
682 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 112 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (ii) basal diet with 55 ppm of BAC methylene disalicylate Basal diet with 55 ppm of BAC methylene disalicylate; (CIN) Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 62.30 None 48.50 None 320 320 None None None None None
683 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 112 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (ii) basal diet with 55 ppm of BAC methylene disalicylate Basal diet with 55 ppm of BAC methylene disalicylate; (CIN) Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 64.60 None 62.60 None 320 320 None None None None None
684 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 112 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (ii) basal diet with 55 ppm of BAC methylene disalicylate Basal diet with 55 ppm of BAC methylene disalicylate; (CIN) Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 0.00 None 8.50 None 320 320 None None None None None
685 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 112 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (ii) basal diet with 55 ppm of BAC methylene disalicylate Basal diet with 55 ppm of BAC methylene disalicylate; (CIN) Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 14.80 None 4.60 None 320 320 None None None None None
686 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 112 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (ii) basal diet with 55 ppm of BAC methylene disalicylate Basal diet with 55 ppm of BAC methylene disalicylate; (CIN) Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 66.70 None 56.00 None 320 320 None None None None None
687 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 112 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (ii) basal diet with 55 ppm of BAC methylene disalicylate Basal diet with 55 ppm of BAC methylene disalicylate; (CIN) Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 72.80 None 58.50 None 320 320 None None None None None
690 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 115 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (iii) basal diet with 100 ppm of encapsulated CIN; (iii) basal diet with 100 ppm of encapsulated CIN (CIN) Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 23.20 None 39.40 None 320 320 None None None None None
689 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 115 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (iii) basal diet with 100 ppm of encapsulated CIN; (iii) basal diet with 100 ppm of encapsulated CIN (CIN) Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 23.20 None 35.50 None 320 320 None None None None None
691 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 115 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (iii) basal diet with 100 ppm of encapsulated CIN; (iii) basal diet with 100 ppm of encapsulated CIN (CIN) Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 23.00 None 39.60 None 320 320 None None None None None
692 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 115 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (iii) basal diet with 100 ppm of encapsulated CIN; (iii) basal diet with 100 ppm of encapsulated CIN (CIN) Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 37.80 None 58.50 None 320 320 None None None None None
693 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 115 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (iii) basal diet with 100 ppm of encapsulated CIN; (iii) basal diet with 100 ppm of encapsulated CIN (CIN) Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 23.50 None 35.70 None 320 320 None None None None None
694 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 115 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (iii) basal diet with 100 ppm of encapsulated CIN; (iii) basal diet with 100 ppm of encapsulated CIN (CIN) Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 52.10 None 48.50 None 320 320 None None None None None
695 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 115 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (iii) basal diet with 100 ppm of encapsulated CIN; (iii) basal diet with 100 ppm of encapsulated CIN (CIN) Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 54.40 None 62.60 None 320 320 None None None None None
696 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 115 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (iii) basal diet with 100 ppm of encapsulated CIN; (iii) basal diet with 100 ppm of encapsulated CIN (CIN) Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 45.70 None 56.00 None 320 320 None None None None None
697 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 115 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (iii) basal diet with 100 ppm of encapsulated CIN; (iii) basal diet with 100 ppm of encapsulated CIN (CIN) Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 27.60 None 4.60 None 320 320 None None None None None
698 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 115 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (iii) basal diet with 100 ppm of encapsulated CIN; (iii) basal diet with 100 ppm of encapsulated CIN (CIN) Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 50.10 None 58.50 None 320 320 None None None None None
699 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 115 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (iii) basal diet with 100 ppm of encapsulated CIN; (iii) basal diet with 100 ppm of encapsulated CIN (CIN) Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 45.70 None 56.00 None 320 320 None None None None None
700 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 113 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (iv) basal diet with100 ppm of encapsulated CIT (iv) basal diet with100 ppm of encapsulated CIT Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 43.90 None 35.50 None 320 320 None None None None None
711 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 114 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC) (v) basal diet with a combination of 100 ppm each of encapsulated CIN and CIT (CINþCIT) (v) basal diet with a combination of 100 ppm each of encapsulated CIN and CIT (CINþCIT) Negative Control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 35.50 None 35.50 None 320 320 None None None None None
712 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 114 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC) (v) basal diet with a combination of 100 ppm each of encapsulated CIN and CIT (CINþCIT) (v) basal diet with a combination of 100 ppm each of encapsulated CIN and CIT (CINþCIT) Negative Control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 35.70 None 39.40 None 320 320 None None None None None
713 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 114 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC) (v) basal diet with a combination of 100 ppm each of encapsulated CIN and CIT (CINþCIT) (v) basal diet with a combination of 100 ppm each of encapsulated CIN and CIT (CINþCIT) Negative Control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 37.80 None 39.60 None 320 320 None None None None None
714 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 114 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC) (v) basal diet with a combination of 100 ppm each of encapsulated CIN and CIT (CINþCIT) (v) basal diet with a combination of 100 ppm each of encapsulated CIN and CIT (CINþCIT) Negative Control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 56.40 None 58.50 None 320 320 None None None None None
715 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 114 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC) (v) basal diet with a combination of 100 ppm each of encapsulated CIN and CIT (CINþCIT) (v) basal diet with a combination of 100 ppm each of encapsulated CIN and CIT (CINþCIT) Negative Control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 35.70 None 35.70 None 320 320 None None None None None
716 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 114 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC) (v) basal diet with a combination of 100 ppm each of encapsulated CIN and CIT (CINþCIT) (v) basal diet with a combination of 100 ppm each of encapsulated CIN and CIT (CINþCIT) Negative Control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 49.80 None 48.50 None 320 320 None None None None None
717 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 114 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC) (v) basal diet with a combination of 100 ppm each of encapsulated CIN and CIT (CINþCIT) (v) basal diet with a combination of 100 ppm each of encapsulated CIN and CIT (CINþCIT) Negative Control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 64.60 None 62.60 None 320 320 None None None None None
718 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 114 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC) (v) basal diet with a combination of 100 ppm each of encapsulated CIN and CIT (CINþCIT) (v) basal diet with a combination of 100 ppm each of encapsulated CIN and CIT (CINþCIT) Negative Control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 4.20 None 8.50 None 320 320 None None None None None
719 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 114 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC) (v) basal diet with a combination of 100 ppm each of encapsulated CIN and CIT (CINþCIT) (v) basal diet with a combination of 100 ppm each of encapsulated CIN and CIT (CINþCIT) Negative Control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 2.60 None 4.60 None 320 320 None None None None None
720 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 114 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC) (v) basal diet with a combination of 100 ppm each of encapsulated CIN and CIT (CINþCIT) (v) basal diet with a combination of 100 ppm each of encapsulated CIN and CIT (CINþCIT) Negative Control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 71.20 None 58.50 None 320 320 None None None None None
721 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 114 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC) (v) basal diet with a combination of 100 ppm each of encapsulated CIN and CIT (CINþCIT) (v) basal diet with a combination of 100 ppm each of encapsulated CIN and CIT (CINþCIT) Negative Control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 39.80 None 56.00 None 320 320 None None None None None
701 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 113 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (iv) basal diet with100 ppm of encapsulated CIT (iv) basal diet with100 ppm of encapsulated CIT Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 42.30 None 39.40 None 320 320 None None None None None
702 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 113 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (iv) basal diet with100 ppm of encapsulated CIT (iv) basal diet with100 ppm of encapsulated CIT Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 44.20 None 39.60 None 320 320 None None None None None
703 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 113 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (iv) basal diet with100 ppm of encapsulated CIT (iv) basal diet with100 ppm of encapsulated CIT Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 52.30 None 58.50 None 320 320 None None None None None
704 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 113 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (iv) basal diet with100 ppm of encapsulated CIT (iv) basal diet with100 ppm of encapsulated CIT Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 41.90 None 35.70 None 320 320 None None None None None
705 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 113 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (iv) basal diet with100 ppm of encapsulated CIT (iv) basal diet with100 ppm of encapsulated CIT Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 54.60 None 48.50 None 320 320 None None None None None
706 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 113 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (iv) basal diet with100 ppm of encapsulated CIT (iv) basal diet with100 ppm of encapsulated CIT Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 73.20 None 62.60 None 320 320 None None None None None
707 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 113 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (iv) basal diet with100 ppm of encapsulated CIT (iv) basal diet with100 ppm of encapsulated CIT Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 10.80 None 8.50 None 320 320 None None None None None
708 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 113 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (iv) basal diet with100 ppm of encapsulated CIT (iv) basal diet with100 ppm of encapsulated CIT Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 4.60 None 4.60 None 320 320 None None None None None
709 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 113 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (iv) basal diet with100 ppm of encapsulated CIT (iv) basal diet with100 ppm of encapsulated CIT Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Combinations of antibacterials sulfonamides, combinations with other antibacterials excl. trimethoprim None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 54.40 None 56.00 None 320 320 None None None None None
710 None 86 None None 10.4315/JFP-21-033 MBTNJ9HN Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes and Genotypes of Escherichia coli Isolates from Broiler Chickens Fed Encapsulated Cinnamaldehyde and Citral None Experimental 113 None Treatment (i) basal diet as a negative control (NC); (iv) basal diet with100 ppm of encapsulated CIT (iv) basal diet with100 ppm of encapsulated CIT Negative control (NC) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 79.10 None 58.50 None 320 320 None None None None None
36 None 15 None None 10.3382/ps/pey486 JZL5LDZ9 Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter from antibiotic-free broilers during organic and conventional processing None Observational 13 None Organic Production Organic Production Conventional Production Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 81.60 18.40 65.30 34.70 136 176 None None None None None
722 None 16 None None CZAYX7KL Recovery of Salmonella using a combination of selective enrichment media and antimicrobial resistance of isolates in meat in Thailand None Observational 116 None Retail Types Registered vs. non-register meats Non-registered meats Registered meats Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 38.00 None 50.00 None 42 20 None None None None None
723 None 16 None None CZAYX7KL Recovery of Salmonella using a combination of selective enrichment media and antimicrobial resistance of isolates in meat in Thailand None Observational 116 None Retail Types Registered vs. non-register meats Non-registered meats Registered meats Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 42 20 None None None None None
724 None 16 None None CZAYX7KL Recovery of Salmonella using a combination of selective enrichment media and antimicrobial resistance of isolates in meat in Thailand None Observational 116 None Retail Types Registered vs. non-register meats Non-registered meats Registered meats Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 12.00 None 10.00 None 42 20 None None None None None
725 None 16 None None CZAYX7KL Recovery of Salmonella using a combination of selective enrichment media and antimicrobial resistance of isolates in meat in Thailand None Observational 116 None Retail Types Registered vs. non-register meats Non-registered meats Registered meats Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 42 20 None None None None None
726 None 16 None None CZAYX7KL Recovery of Salmonella using a combination of selective enrichment media and antimicrobial resistance of isolates in meat in Thailand None Observational 116 None Retail Types Registered vs. non-register meats Non-registered meats Registered meats Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 42 20 None None None None None
727 None 16 None None CZAYX7KL Recovery of Salmonella using a combination of selective enrichment media and antimicrobial resistance of isolates in meat in Thailand None Observational 116 None Retail Types Registered vs. non-register meats Non-registered meats Registered meats Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 28.00 None 5.00 None 42 20 None None None None None
728 None 16 None None CZAYX7KL Recovery of Salmonella using a combination of selective enrichment media and antimicrobial resistance of isolates in meat in Thailand None Observational 116 None Retail Types Registered vs. non-register meats Non-registered meats Registered meats Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Quinolones norfloxacin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 42 20 None None None None None
729 None 16 None None CZAYX7KL Recovery of Salmonella using a combination of selective enrichment media and antimicrobial resistance of isolates in meat in Thailand None Observational 116 None Retail Types Registered vs. non-register meats Non-registered meats Registered meats Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 43.00 None 50.00 None 42 20 None None None None None
730 None 16 None None CZAYX7KL Recovery of Salmonella using a combination of selective enrichment media and antimicrobial resistance of isolates in meat in Thailand None Observational 116 None Retail Types Registered vs. non-register meats Non-registered meats Registered meats Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 47.00 None 60.00 None 42 20 None None None None None
675 None 63 None None 10.1089/fpd.2021.0001 6XRMGZNS Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. isolates from broiler chicken meat supply chain in Maputo, Mozambique None Observational 111 None Retail Types Informal Markets vs. Supermarkets Informal markets Supermarkets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Polymyxins colistin None Campylobacter spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 87.10 None 100.00 None 8 8 None None None None None
731 None 16 None None CZAYX7KL Recovery of Salmonella using a combination of selective enrichment media and antimicrobial resistance of isolates in meat in Thailand None Observational 116 None Retail Types Registered vs. non-register meats Non-registered meats Registered meats Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. None None None None None None None 24.00 None 15.00 None 42 20 None None None None None
767 None 25 None None 10.1186/s13620-022-00214-9 7RG33S2E Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from on-farm and conventional hatching broiler farms in Ireland; Merieux None Observational 119 None Production Type On-farm hatching vs conventional hatching On-farm hatching Conventional hatching Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Quinolones marbofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 90.00 None 80.00 None 10 5 None None None None None
733 None 17 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-439 XS7GHTUR Counts, serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates on retail raw poultry in the People's Republic of China None Observational 117 None Market Type large vs. small Small markets Large markets Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella None None None None 169 None 154 None None None None None 260 248 None None None None None
734 None 17 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-439 XS7GHTUR Counts, serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates on retail raw poultry in the People's Republic of China None Observational 117 None Market Type large vs. small Small markets Large markets Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Salmonella None None None None 158 None 154 None None None None None 260 248 None None None None None
735 None 17 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-439 XS7GHTUR Counts, serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates on retail raw poultry in the People's Republic of China None Observational 117 None Market Type large vs. small Small markets Large markets Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella None None None None 162 None 139 None None None None None 260 248 None None None None None
736 None 17 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-439 XS7GHTUR Counts, serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates on retail raw poultry in the People's Republic of China None Observational 117 None Market Type large vs. small Small markets Large markets Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella None None None None 126 None 116 None None None None None 260 248 None None None None None
737 None 17 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-439 XS7GHTUR Counts, serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates on retail raw poultry in the People's Republic of China None Observational 117 None Market Type large vs. small Small markets Large markets Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella None None None None 127 None 100 None None None None None 260 248 None None None None None
738 None 17 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-439 XS7GHTUR Counts, serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates on retail raw poultry in the People's Republic of China None Observational 117 None Market Type large vs. small Small markets Large markets Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella None None None None 111 None 107 None None None None None 260 248 None None None None None
739 None 17 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-439 XS7GHTUR Counts, serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates on retail raw poultry in the People's Republic of China None Observational 117 None Market Type large vs. small Small markets Large markets Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Salmonella None None None None 98 None 101 None None None None None 260 248 None None None None None
741 None 17 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-439 XS7GHTUR Counts, serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates on retail raw poultry in the People's Republic of China None Observational 117 None Market Type large vs. small Small markets Large markets Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella None None None None 97 None 90 None None None None None 260 248 None None None None None
740 None 17 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-439 XS7GHTUR Counts, serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates on retail raw poultry in the People's Republic of China None Observational 117 None Market Type large vs. small Small markets Large markets Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella None None None None 71 None 69 None None None None None 260 248 None None None None None
742 None 17 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-439 XS7GHTUR Counts, serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates on retail raw poultry in the People's Republic of China None Observational 117 None Market Type large vs. small Small markets Large markets Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides amikacin None Salmonella None None None None 67 None 69 None None None None None 260 248 None None None None None
743 None 17 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-439 XS7GHTUR Counts, serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates on retail raw poultry in the People's Republic of China None Observational 117 None Market Type large vs. small Small markets Large markets Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella None None None None 58 None 65 None None None None None 260 248 None None None None None
745 None 17 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-439 XS7GHTUR Counts, serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates on retail raw poultry in the People's Republic of China None Observational 117 None Market Type large vs. small Small markets Large markets Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella None None None None 55 None 62 None None None None None 260 248 None None None None None
732 None 17 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-439 XS7GHTUR Counts, serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates on retail raw poultry in the People's Republic of China None Observational 117 None Market Type large vs. small Small markets Large markets Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella None None None None 196 None 173 None None None None None 260 248 None None None None None
750 None 23 None None 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.09.014 7MRI8RNF Potential transmission opportunity of CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli on a large-scale chicken farm in Vietnam None Observational 23 None Production Type Farm chickens vs. community chickens Community chickens Farm chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 80.00 None 85.00 None 5 27 None None None None None
749 None 23 None None 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.09.014 7MRI8RNF Potential transmission opportunity of CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli on a large-scale chicken farm in Vietnam None Observational 23 None Production Type Farm chickens vs. community chickens Community chickens Farm chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 79.80 None 92.60 None 5 27 None None None None None
768 None 25 None None 10.1186/s13620-022-00214-9 7RG33S2E Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from on-farm and conventional hatching broiler farms in Ireland; Merieux None Observational 119 None Production Type On-farm hatching vs conventional hatching On-farm hatching Conventional hatching Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines doxycycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 30.00 None 0.00 None 10 5 None None None None None
770 None 25 None None 10.1186/s13620-022-00214-9 7RG33S2E Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from on-farm and conventional hatching broiler farms in Ireland; Merieux None Observational 119 None Production Type On-farm hatching vs conventional hatching On-farm hatching Conventional hatching Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 10.00 None 0.00 None 10 5 None None None None None
751 None 23 None None 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.09.014 7MRI8RNF Potential transmission opportunity of CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli on a large-scale chicken farm in Vietnam None Observational 23 None Production Type Farm chickens vs. community chickens Community chickens Farm chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 5 27 None None None None None
752 None 23 None None 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.09.014 7MRI8RNF Potential transmission opportunity of CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli on a large-scale chicken farm in Vietnam None Observational 23 None Production Type Farm chickens vs. community chickens Community chickens Farm chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 40.30 None 70.60 None 5 27 None None None None None
753 None 23 None None 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.09.014 7MRI8RNF Potential transmission opportunity of CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli on a large-scale chicken farm in Vietnam None Observational 23 None Production Type Farm chickens vs. community chickens Community chickens Farm chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 40.00 None 77.40 None 5 27 None None None None None
756 None 23 None None 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.09.014 7MRI8RNF Potential transmission opportunity of CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli on a large-scale chicken farm in Vietnam None Observational 23 None Production Type Farm chickens vs. community chickens Community chickens Farm chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 14.50 None 5 27 None None None None None
755 None 23 None None 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.09.014 7MRI8RNF Potential transmission opportunity of CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli on a large-scale chicken farm in Vietnam None Observational 23 None Production Type Farm chickens vs. community chickens Community chickens Farm chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 11.50 None 5 27 None None None None None
754 None 23 None None 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.09.014 7MRI8RNF Potential transmission opportunity of CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli on a large-scale chicken farm in Vietnam None Observational 23 None Production Type Farm chickens vs. community chickens Community chickens Farm chickens Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Carbapenems meropenem None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 5 27 None None None None None
761 None 25 None None 10.1186/s13620-022-00214-9 7RG33S2E Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from on-farm and conventional hatching broiler farms in Ireland; Merieux None Observational 119 None Production Type On-farm hatching vs conventional hatching On-farm hatching Conventional hatching Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 10 5 None None None None None
758 None 25 None None 10.1186/s13620-022-00214-9 7RG33S2E Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from on-farm and conventional hatching broiler farms in Ireland; Merieux None Observational 119 None Production Type On-farm hatching vs conventional hatching On-farm hatching Conventional hatching Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 90.00 None 100.00 None 10 5 None None None None None
759 None 25 None None 10.1186/s13620-022-00214-9 7RG33S2E Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from on-farm and conventional hatching broiler farms in Ireland; Merieux None Observational 119 None Production Type On-farm hatching vs conventional hatching On-farm hatching Conventional hatching Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None First-generation cephalosporins cefalexin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 10 5 None None None None None
757 None 25 None None 10.1186/s13620-022-00214-9 7RG33S2E Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from on-farm and conventional hatching broiler farms in Ireland; Merieux None Observational 119 None Production Type On-farm hatching vs conventional hatching On-farm hatching Conventional hatching Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefpodoxime None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 90.00 None 100.00 None 10 5 None None None None None
760 None 25 None None 10.1186/s13620-022-00214-9 7RG33S2E Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from on-farm and conventional hatching broiler farms in Ireland; Merieux None Observational 119 None Production Type On-farm hatching vs conventional hatching On-farm hatching Conventional hatching Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefovecin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 10 5 None None None None None
762 None 25 None None 10.1186/s13620-022-00214-9 7RG33S2E Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from on-farm and conventional hatching broiler farms in Ireland; Merieux None Observational 119 None Production Type On-farm hatching vs conventional hatching On-farm hatching Conventional hatching Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftazidime None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 90.00 None 100.00 None 10 5 None None None None None
763 None 25 None None 10.1186/s13620-022-00214-9 7RG33S2E Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from on-farm and conventional hatching broiler farms in Ireland; Merieux None Observational 119 None Production Type On-farm hatching vs conventional hatching On-farm hatching Conventional hatching Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 100.00 None 100.00 None 10 5 None None None None None
764 None 25 None None 10.1186/s13620-022-00214-9 7RG33S2E Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from on-farm and conventional hatching broiler farms in Ireland; Merieux None Observational 119 None Production Type On-farm hatching vs conventional hatching On-farm hatching Conventional hatching Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 10 5 None None None None None
765 None 25 None None 10.1186/s13620-022-00214-9 7RG33S2E Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from on-farm and conventional hatching broiler farms in Ireland; Merieux None Observational 119 None Production Type On-farm hatching vs conventional hatching On-farm hatching Conventional hatching Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 90.00 None 80.00 None 10 5 None None None None None
766 None 25 None None 10.1186/s13620-022-00214-9 7RG33S2E Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from on-farm and conventional hatching broiler farms in Ireland; Merieux None Observational 119 None Production Type On-farm hatching vs conventional hatching On-farm hatching Conventional hatching Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 90.00 None 80.00 None 10 5 None None None None None
771 None 25 None None 10.1186/s13620-022-00214-9 7RG33S2E Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from on-farm and conventional hatching broiler farms in Ireland; Merieux None Observational 119 None Production Type On-farm hatching vs conventional hatching On-farm hatching Conventional hatching Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 40.00 None 0.00 None 10 5 None None None None None
769 None 25 None None 10.1186/s13620-022-00214-9 7RG33S2E Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from on-farm and conventional hatching broiler farms in Ireland; Merieux None Observational 119 None Production Type On-farm hatching vs conventional hatching On-farm hatching Conventional hatching Chicken Chicks None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 30.00 None 100.00 None 10 5 None None None None None
777 None 33 None None 10.1128/AEM.71.7.4108-4111.2005 TVL3UWKI Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores None Observational 121 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 70.00 None 80.00 None 150 45 None None None None None
776 None 33 None None 10.1128/AEM.71.7.4108-4111.2005 TVL3UWKI Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores None Observational 121 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 150 45 None None None None None
778 None 33 None None 10.1128/AEM.71.7.4108-4111.2005 TVL3UWKI Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores None Observational 121 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 20.00 None 5.00 None 150 45 None None None None None
779 None 33 None None 10.1128/AEM.71.7.4108-4111.2005 TVL3UWKI Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella Serovars in Organic Chickens from Maryland Retail Stores None Observational 121 None Production Type Conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter spp. None None None None None None None 37.00 None 45.00 None 150 45 None None None None None
781 None 35 None None 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 THVCXV5U Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims None Observational 122 None Production type conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin, combinations None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 11.00 None 13.00 None 166 712 None None None None None
780 None 35 None None 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 THVCXV5U Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims None Observational 122 None Production type conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 14.00 None 22.00 None 166 712 None None None None None
782 None 35 None None 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 THVCXV5U Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims None Observational 122 None Production type conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 13.00 None 17.00 None 166 712 None None None None None
783 None 35 None None 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 THVCXV5U Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims None Observational 122 None Production type conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 7.00 None 9.00 None 166 712 None None None None None
784 None 35 None None 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 THVCXV5U Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims None Observational 122 None Production type conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 8.00 None 8.00 None 166 712 None None None None None
785 None 35 None None 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 THVCXV5U Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims None Observational 122 None Production type conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 3.00 None 2.00 None 166 712 None None None None None
786 None 35 None None 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 THVCXV5U Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims None Observational 122 None Production type conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 5.00 None 3.00 None 166 712 None None None None None
787 None 35 None None 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 THVCXV5U Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims None Observational 122 None Production type conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 16.00 None 40.00 None 166 712 None None None None None
788 None 35 None None 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 THVCXV5U Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims None Observational 122 None Production type conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 33.00 None 39.00 None 166 712 None None None None None
789 None 35 None None 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 THVCXV5U Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims None Observational 122 None Production type conventional vs. organic Organic Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 5.00 None 6.00 None 166 712 None None None None None
790 None 35 None None 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 THVCXV5U Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims None Observational 123 None Production type conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antbiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 20.00 None 22.00 None 293 712 None None None None None
791 None 35 None None 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 THVCXV5U Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims None Observational 123 None Production type conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antbiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin, combinations None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 12.00 None 13.00 None 293 712 None None None None None
792 None 35 None None 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 THVCXV5U Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims None Observational 123 None Production type conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antbiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 17.00 None 17.00 None 293 712 None None None None None
793 None 35 None None 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 THVCXV5U Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims None Observational 123 None Production type conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antbiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 9.00 None 9.00 None 293 712 None None None None None
794 None 35 None None 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 THVCXV5U Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims None Observational 123 None Production type conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antbiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 9.00 None 8.00 None 293 712 None None None None None
795 None 35 None None 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 THVCXV5U Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims None Observational 123 None Production type conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antbiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 1.00 None 2.00 None 293 712 None None None None None
796 None 35 None None 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 THVCXV5U Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims None Observational 123 None Production type conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antbiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 4.00 None 3.00 None 293 712 None None None None None
797 None 35 None None 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 THVCXV5U Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims None Observational 123 None Production type conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antbiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 21.00 None 40.00 None 293 712 None None None None None
798 None 35 None None 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 THVCXV5U Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims None Observational 123 None Production type conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antbiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 37.00 None 39.00 None 293 712 None None None None None
799 None 35 None None 10.1186/s12866-018-1322-5 THVCXV5U Antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli from retail poultry meat with different antibiotic use claims None Observational 123 None Production type conventional vs. raised without antibiotics Raised without antbiotics Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Retail Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 4.00 None 6.00 None 293 712 None None None None None
800 None 36 None None 10.1080/00071668.2020.1833302 5I3LFAED Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in thermophilic Campylobacter strains isolated from conventional production and backyard poultry flocks None Observational 124 None Production type conventional vs. backyard Backyard Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Campylobacter spp. None None None 0 None 11 None None None None None 36 34 None None None None None
801 None 36 None None 10.1080/00071668.2020.1833302 5I3LFAED Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in thermophilic Campylobacter strains isolated from conventional production and backyard poultry flocks None Observational 124 None Production type conventional vs. backyard Backyard Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Campylobacter spp. None None None 5 None 15 None None None None None 36 34 None None None None None
802 None 36 None None 10.1080/00071668.2020.1833302 5I3LFAED Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in thermophilic Campylobacter strains isolated from conventional production and backyard poultry flocks None Observational 124 None Production type conventional vs. backyard Backyard Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Campylobacter spp. None None None 25 None 23 None None None None None 36 34 None None None None None
803 None 36 None None 10.1080/00071668.2020.1833302 5I3LFAED Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in thermophilic Campylobacter strains isolated from conventional production and backyard poultry flocks None Observational 124 None Production type conventional vs. backyard Backyard Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Campylobacter spp. None None None 36 None 33 None None None None None 36 34 None None None None None
804 None 36 None None 10.1080/00071668.2020.1833302 5I3LFAED Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in thermophilic Campylobacter strains isolated from conventional production and backyard poultry flocks None Observational 124 None Production type conventional vs. backyard Backyard Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Quinolones enrofloxacin None Campylobacter spp. None None None 33 None 28 None None None None None 36 34 None None None None None
805 None 36 None None 10.1080/00071668.2020.1833302 5I3LFAED Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in thermophilic Campylobacter strains isolated from conventional production and backyard poultry flocks None Observational 124 None Production type conventional vs. backyard Backyard Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Macrolides erythromycin None Campylobacter spp. None None None 2 None 9 None None None None None 36 34 None None None None None
806 None 36 None None 10.1080/00071668.2020.1833302 5I3LFAED Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in thermophilic Campylobacter strains isolated from conventional production and backyard poultry flocks None Observational 124 None Production type conventional vs. backyard Backyard Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Campylobacter spp. None None None 0 None 2 None None None None None 36 34 None None None None None
808 None 36 None None 10.1080/00071668.2020.1833302 5I3LFAED Comparison of antimicrobial resistance in thermophilic Campylobacter strains isolated from conventional production and backyard poultry flocks None Observational 124 None Production type conventional vs. backyard Backyard Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter spp. None None None 6 None 13 None None None None None 36 34 None None None None None
809 None 37 None None 10.1016/j.vas.2022.100248 QR57GUII Decreasing trend of beta-lactam resistance in Salmonella isolates from broiler chickens due to the cessation of ceftiofur in ovo administration None Observational 125 None Ceftiofur Ban Before ban (2009 -2012) after ban (2018) after ban (2018) Before ban (2009 -2012) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. None None None 0 None 93 None None None None None 34 98 None None None None None
810 None 37 None None 10.1016/j.vas.2022.100248 QR57GUII Decreasing trend of beta-lactam resistance in Salmonella isolates from broiler chickens due to the cessation of ceftiofur in ovo administration None Observational 125 None Ceftiofur Ban Before ban (2009 -2012) after ban (2018) after ban (2018) Before ban (2009 -2012) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Salmonella spp. None None None 0 None 92 None None None None None 34 98 None None None None None
813 None 37 None None 10.1016/j.vas.2022.100248 QR57GUII Decreasing trend of beta-lactam resistance in Salmonella isolates from broiler chickens due to the cessation of ceftiofur in ovo administration None Observational 125 None Ceftiofur Ban Before ban (2009 -2012) after ban (2018) after ban (2018) Before ban (2009 -2012) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Salmonella spp. None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 34 98 None None None None None
772 None 32 None None 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02633 JAWJGAW6 Resistance Reservoirs and Multi-Drug Resistance of Commensal Escherichia coli From Excreta and Manure Isolated in Broiler Houses With Different Flooring Designs None Experimental 120 None Biosecurity [Litter (L) = entire floor stable covered with litter (wood shavings), Partial-slats (PS) = floor stable with litter and one-quarter slatted flooring] at three different sampling times Partial-slats (PS) = floor stable with litter and one-quarter slatted flooring] at three different sampling times [Litter (L) = entire floor stable covered with litter (wood shavings) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Quinolones enrofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 21.60 None 14.80 None 60 60 None None None None None
773 None 32 None None 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02633 JAWJGAW6 Resistance Reservoirs and Multi-Drug Resistance of Commensal Escherichia coli From Excreta and Manure Isolated in Broiler Houses With Different Flooring Designs None Experimental 120 None Biosecurity [Litter (L) = entire floor stable covered with litter (wood shavings), Partial-slats (PS) = floor stable with litter and one-quarter slatted flooring] at three different sampling times Partial-slats (PS) = floor stable with litter and one-quarter slatted flooring] at three different sampling times [Litter (L) = entire floor stable covered with litter (wood shavings) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 32.40 None 40.80 None 60 60 None None None None None
775 None 32 None None 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02633 JAWJGAW6 Resistance Reservoirs and Multi-Drug Resistance of Commensal Escherichia coli From Excreta and Manure Isolated in Broiler Houses With Different Flooring Designs None Experimental 120 None Biosecurity [Litter (L) = entire floor stable covered with litter (wood shavings), Partial-slats (PS) = floor stable with litter and one-quarter slatted flooring] at three different sampling times Partial-slats (PS) = floor stable with litter and one-quarter slatted flooring] at three different sampling times [Litter (L) = entire floor stable covered with litter (wood shavings) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 18.40 None 33.20 None 60 60 None None None None None
774 None 32 None None 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02633 JAWJGAW6 Resistance Reservoirs and Multi-Drug Resistance of Commensal Escherichia coli From Excreta and Manure Isolated in Broiler Houses With Different Flooring Designs None Experimental 120 None Biosecurity [Litter (L) = entire floor stable covered with litter (wood shavings), Partial-slats (PS) = floor stable with litter and one-quarter slatted flooring] at three different sampling times Partial-slats (PS) = floor stable with litter and one-quarter slatted flooring] at three different sampling times [Litter (L) = entire floor stable covered with litter (wood shavings) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 21.60 None 55.60 None 60 60 None None None None None
748 None 18 None None 10.3390/antibiotics11111580 LMI9RWGH Prevalence, Tetracycline Resistance and Tet(O) Gene Identification in Pathogenic Campylobacter Strains Isolated from Chickens in Retail Markets of Lima, Peru None Observational 118 None Retail Types Traditional vs. supermarkets Traditional Supermarkets Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Campylobacter None None None None 117 None 51 None None None None None 117 51 None None None None None
746 None 17 None None 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-439 XS7GHTUR Counts, serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates on retail raw poultry in the People's Republic of China None Observational 117 None Market Type large vs. small Small markets Large markets Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Contingency Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Salmonella None None None None 52 None 49 None None None None None 260 248 None None None None None
811 None 37 None None 10.1016/j.vas.2022.100248 QR57GUII Decreasing trend of beta-lactam resistance in Salmonella isolates from broiler chickens due to the cessation of ceftiofur in ovo administration None Observational 125 None Ceftiofur Ban Before ban (2009 -2012) after ban (2018) after ban (2018) Before ban (2009 -2012) Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Salmonella spp. None None None 0 None 90 None None None None None 34 98 None None None None None
832 None 105 None None 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00497 MQN84R23 Epidemiological Investigation and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Salmonella Isolated From Breeder Chicken Hatcheries in Henan, China None Observational 126 None Production type large vs. small hatcheries Small large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Salmonella spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 56.90 None 30.10 None 142 180 None None None None None
815 None 105 None None 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00497 MQN84R23 Epidemiological Investigation and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Salmonella Isolated From Breeder Chicken Hatcheries in Henan, China None Observational 126 None Production type large vs. small hatcheries Small large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Salmonella spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 7.50 None 15.10 None 142 180 None None None None None
816 None 105 None None 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00497 MQN84R23 Epidemiological Investigation and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Salmonella Isolated From Breeder Chicken Hatcheries in Henan, China None Observational 126 None Production type large vs. small hatcheries Small large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Salmonella spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 7.90 None 10.20 None 142 180 None None None None None
817 None 105 None None 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00497 MQN84R23 Epidemiological Investigation and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Salmonella Isolated From Breeder Chicken Hatcheries in Henan, China None Observational 126 None Production type large vs. small hatcheries Small large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides amikacin None Salmonella spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 8.30 None 10.20 None 142 180 None None None None None
814 None 105 None None 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00497 MQN84R23 Epidemiological Investigation and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Salmonella Isolated From Breeder Chicken Hatcheries in Henan, China None Observational 126 None Production type large vs. small hatcheries Small large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Salmonella spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 3.80 None 0.00 None 142 180 None None None None None
818 None 105 None None 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00497 MQN84R23 Epidemiological Investigation and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Salmonella Isolated From Breeder Chicken Hatcheries in Henan, China None Observational 126 None Production type large vs. small hatcheries Small large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Salmonella spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 6.40 None 10.20 None 142 180 None None None None None
819 None 105 None None 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00497 MQN84R23 Epidemiological Investigation and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Salmonella Isolated From Breeder Chicken Hatcheries in Henan, China None Observational 126 None Production type large vs. small hatcheries Small large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftazidime None Salmonella spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 30.90 None 24.50 None 142 180 None None None None None
820 None 105 None None 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00497 MQN84R23 Epidemiological Investigation and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Salmonella Isolated From Breeder Chicken Hatcheries in Henan, China None Observational 126 None Production type large vs. small hatcheries Small large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None First-generation cephalosporins cefazolin None Salmonella spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 30.90 None 24.50 None 142 180 None None None None None
821 None 105 None None 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00497 MQN84R23 Epidemiological Investigation and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Salmonella Isolated From Breeder Chicken Hatcheries in Henan, China None Observational 126 None Production type large vs. small hatcheries Small large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Carbapenems meropenem None Salmonella spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 0.00 None 1.00 None 142 180 None None None None None
822 None 105 None None 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00497 MQN84R23 Epidemiological Investigation and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Salmonella Isolated From Breeder Chicken Hatcheries in Henan, China None Observational 126 None Production type large vs. small hatcheries Small large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Carbapenems imipenem and cilastatin None Salmonella spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 142 180 None None None None None
823 None 105 None None 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00497 MQN84R23 Epidemiological Investigation and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Salmonella Isolated From Breeder Chicken Hatcheries in Henan, China None Observational 126 None Production type large vs. small hatcheries Small large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Monobactams aztreonam None Salmonella spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 6.80 None 10.50 None 142 180 None None None None None
824 None 105 None None 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00497 MQN84R23 Epidemiological Investigation and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Salmonella Isolated From Breeder Chicken Hatcheries in Henan, China None Observational 126 None Production type large vs. small hatcheries Small large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 37.30 None 10.50 None 142 180 None None None None None
825 None 105 None None 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00497 MQN84R23 Epidemiological Investigation and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Salmonella Isolated From Breeder Chicken Hatcheries in Henan, China None Observational 126 None Production type large vs. small hatcheries Small large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines oxytetracycline None Salmonella spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 36.90 None 10.20 None 142 180 None None None None None
826 None 105 None None 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00497 MQN84R23 Epidemiological Investigation and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Salmonella Isolated From Breeder Chicken Hatcheries in Henan, China None Observational 126 None Production type large vs. small hatcheries Small large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Polymyxins colistin None Salmonella spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 142 180 None None None None None
827 None 105 None None 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00497 MQN84R23 Epidemiological Investigation and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Salmonella Isolated From Breeder Chicken Hatcheries in Henan, China None Observational 126 None Production type large vs. small hatcheries Small large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Quinolones enrofloxacin None Salmonella spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 9.80 None 50.80 None 142 180 None None None None None
828 None 105 None None 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00497 MQN84R23 Epidemiological Investigation and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Salmonella Isolated From Breeder Chicken Hatcheries in Henan, China None Observational 126 None Production type large vs. small hatcheries Small large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Salmonella spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 77.60 None 64.40 None 142 180 None None None None None
829 None 105 None None 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00497 MQN84R23 Epidemiological Investigation and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Salmonella Isolated From Breeder Chicken Hatcheries in Henan, China None Observational 126 None Production type large vs. small hatcheries Small large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Salmonella spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 142 180 None None None None None
831 None 105 None None 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00497 MQN84R23 Epidemiological Investigation and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Salmonella Isolated From Breeder Chicken Hatcheries in Henan, China None Observational 126 None Production type large vs. small hatcheries Small large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Salmonella spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 10.50 None 10.90 None 142 180 None None None None None
833 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 127 None Treatment Control vs. Trisodium phosphate (TP) stored for 5 days Trisodium Phosphate Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 45.00 None 24.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
834 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 127 None Treatment Control vs. Trisodium phosphate (TP) stored for 5 days Trisodium Phosphate Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Pencillins with extended spectrum ampicillin, combinations None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 20.00 None 5.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
835 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 127 None Treatment Control vs. Trisodium phosphate (TP) stored for 5 days Trisodium Phosphate Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 54.00 None 50.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
836 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 127 None Treatment Control vs. Trisodium phosphate (TP) stored for 5 days Trisodium Phosphate Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins piperacillin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 33.00 None 9.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
855 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 130 None Treatment Control vs. acidified sodium chlorite at 5 days of storage Acidified sodium chlorite Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 41.00 None 24.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
846 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 130 None Treatment Control vs. acidified sodium chlorite at 5 days of storage Acidified sodium chlorite Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin, combinations None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 0.00 None 5.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
847 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 130 None Treatment Control vs. acidified sodium chlorite at 5 days of storage Acidified sodium chlorite Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 79.00 None 40.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
848 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 130 None Treatment Control vs. acidified sodium chlorite at 5 days of storage Acidified sodium chlorite Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins piperacillin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 27.00 None 9.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
864 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 129 None Treatment Control vs. Ascorbic acid Ascorbic acid Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 5.00 None 24.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
858 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 129 None Treatment Control vs. Ascorbic acid Ascorbic acid Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin, combinations None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 5.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
859 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 129 None Treatment Control vs. Ascorbic acid Ascorbic acid Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 99.00 None 40.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
860 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 129 None Treatment Control vs. Ascorbic acid Ascorbic acid Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins piperacillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 6.00 None 9.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
837 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 127 None Treatment Control vs. Trisodium phosphate (TP) stored for 5 days Trisodium Phosphate Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 24.00 None 7.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
838 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 127 None Treatment Control vs. Trisodium phosphate (TP) stored for 5 days Trisodium Phosphate Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 48.00 None 35.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
839 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 127 None Treatment Control vs. Trisodium phosphate (TP) stored for 5 days Trisodium Phosphate Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 31.00 None 18.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
840 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 127 None Treatment Control vs. Trisodium phosphate (TP) stored for 5 days Trisodium Phosphate Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 54.00 None 71.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
841 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 127 None Treatment Control vs. Trisodium phosphate (TP) stored for 5 days Trisodium Phosphate Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 69.00 None 90.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
843 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 127 None Treatment Control vs. Trisodium phosphate (TP) stored for 5 days Trisodium Phosphate Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 47.00 None 38.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
842 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 127 None Treatment Control vs. Trisodium phosphate (TP) stored for 5 days Trisodium Phosphate Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
844 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 127 None Treatment Control vs. Trisodium phosphate (TP) stored for 5 days Trisodium Phosphate Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 38.00 None 4.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
849 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 130 None Treatment Control vs. acidified sodium chlorite at 5 days of storage Acidified sodium chlorite Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 14.00 None 7.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
851 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 130 None Treatment Control vs. acidified sodium chlorite at 5 days of storage Acidified sodium chlorite Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 52.00 None 35.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
852 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 130 None Treatment Control vs. acidified sodium chlorite at 5 days of storage Acidified sodium chlorite Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 28.00 None 18.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
850 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 130 None Treatment Control vs. acidified sodium chlorite at 5 days of storage Acidified sodium chlorite Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 83.00 None 71.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
854 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 130 None Treatment Control vs. acidified sodium chlorite at 5 days of storage Acidified sodium chlorite Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 100.00 None 90.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
845 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 130 None Treatment Control vs. acidified sodium chlorite at 5 days of storage Acidified sodium chlorite Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 88.00 None 38.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
853 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 130 None Treatment Control vs. acidified sodium chlorite at 5 days of storage Acidified sodium chlorite Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
856 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 130 None Treatment Control vs. acidified sodium chlorite at 5 days of storage Acidified sodium chlorite Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 5.00 None 4.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
857 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 129 None Treatment Control vs. Ascorbic acid Ascorbic acid Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 14.00 None 7.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
862 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 129 None Treatment Control vs. Ascorbic acid Ascorbic acid Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 76.00 None 35.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
863 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 129 None Treatment Control vs. Ascorbic acid Ascorbic acid Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 32.00 None 18.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
861 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 129 None Treatment Control vs. Ascorbic acid Ascorbic acid Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 83.00 None 71.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
830 None 105 None None 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00497 MQN84R23 Epidemiological Investigation and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Salmonella Isolated From Breeder Chicken Hatcheries in Henan, China None Observational 126 None Production type large vs. small hatcheries Small large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Salmonella spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 21.80 None 0.00 None 142 180 None None None None None
879 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 128 None Treatment Control vs. Citric acid Citric acid control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 3.00 None 24.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
870 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 128 None Treatment Control vs. Citric acid Citric acid control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin, combinations None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 4.00 None 5.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
871 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 128 None Treatment Control vs. Citric acid Citric acid control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 75.00 None 40.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
872 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 128 None Treatment Control vs. Citric acid Citric acid control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Penicillins piperacillin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 5.00 None 9.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
865 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 129 None Treatment Control vs. Ascorbic acid Ascorbic acid Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 59.00 None 90.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
866 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 129 None Treatment Control vs. Ascorbic acid Ascorbic acid Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 71.00 None 38.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
867 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 129 None Treatment Control vs. Ascorbic acid Ascorbic acid Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
868 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 129 None Treatment Control vs. Ascorbic acid Ascorbic acid Control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 0.00 None 4.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
869 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 128 None Treatment Control vs. Citric acid Citric acid control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefotaxime None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 7.00 None 7.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
873 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 128 None Treatment Control vs. Citric acid Citric acid control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 72.00 None 35.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
874 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 128 None Treatment Control vs. Citric acid Citric acid control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 28.00 None 18.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
876 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 128 None Treatment Control vs. Citric acid Citric acid control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 97.00 None 71.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
875 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 128 None Treatment Control vs. Citric acid Citric acid control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones nalidixic acid None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 81.00 None 90.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
878 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 128 None Treatment Control vs. Citric acid Citric acid control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 90.00 None 38.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
880 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 128 None Treatment Control vs. Citric acid Citric acid control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 0.00 None 0.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
877 None 27 None None 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.011 AGDRQ2KS Decontamination treatments can increase the prevalence of resistance to antibiotics of Escherichia coli naturally present on poultry None Experimental 128 None Treatment Control vs. Citric acid Citric acid control Chicken Broilers None None Abattoir Abattoir Prevalence Table None Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 0.00 None 4.00 None 10 10 None None None None None
881 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 131 None Biosecurity Practices Biosecurity (Presence of pets/ vermins/ wild animals or Absence) Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None 9 None 22 None None None None None 11 27 None None None None None
882 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 131 None Biosecurity Practices Biosecurity (Presence of pets/ vermins/ wild animals or Absence) Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None 5 None 2 None None None None None 11 27 None None None None None
883 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 131 None Biosecurity Practices Biosecurity (Presence of pets/ vermins/ wild animals or Absence) Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Tetracyclines doxycycline None Escherichia coli None None None 10 None 20 None None None None None 11 27 None None None None None
884 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 131 None Biosecurity Practices Biosecurity (Presence of pets/ vermins/ wild animals or Absence) Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Carbapenems meropenem None Escherichia coli None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 11 27 None None None None None
885 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 131 None Biosecurity Practices Biosecurity (Presence of pets/ vermins/ wild animals or Absence) Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None 10 None 17 None None None None None 11 27 None None None None None
886 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 131 None Biosecurity Practices Biosecurity (Presence of pets/ vermins/ wild animals or Absence) Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli None None None 2 None 3 None None None None None 11 27 None None None None None
887 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 131 None Biosecurity Practices Biosecurity (Presence of pets/ vermins/ wild animals or Absence) Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefpodoxime None Escherichia coli None None None 8 None 20 None None None None None 11 27 None None None None None
888 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 131 None Biosecurity Practices Biosecurity (Presence of pets/ vermins/ wild animals or Absence) Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None 9 None 18 None None None None None 11 27 None None None None None
889 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 131 None Biosecurity Practices Biosecurity (Presence of pets/ vermins/ wild animals or Absence) Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None 5 None 9 None None None None None 11 27 None None None None None
890 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 131 None Biosecurity Practices Biosecurity (Presence of pets/ vermins/ wild animals or Absence) Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Escherichia coli None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 11 27 None None None None None
892 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 131 None Biosecurity Practices Biosecurity (Presence of pets/ vermins/ wild animals or Absence) Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Macrolides azithromycin None Escherichia coli None None None 7 None 8 None None None None None 11 27 None None None None None
891 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 131 None Biosecurity Practices Biosecurity (Presence of pets/ vermins/ wild animals or Absence) Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli None None None 3 None 5 None None None None None 11 27 None None None None None
893 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 132 None Flock Size Medium vs. large Medium Large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None 18 None 15 None None None None None 20 18 None None None None None
894 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 132 None Flock Size Medium vs. large Medium Large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None 5 None 2 None None None None None 20 18 None None None None None
895 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 132 None Flock Size Medium vs. large Medium Large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Tetracyclines doxycycline None Escherichia coli None None None 15 None 13 None None None None None 20 18 None None None None None
896 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 132 None Flock Size Medium vs. large Medium Large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Carbapenems meropenem None Escherichia coli None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 18 None None None None None
897 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 132 None Flock Size Medium vs. large Medium Large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None 15 None 10 None None None None None 20 18 None None None None None
898 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 132 None Flock Size Medium vs. large Medium Large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli None None None 5 None 0 None None None None None 20 18 None None None None None
899 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 132 None Flock Size Medium vs. large Medium Large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefpodoxime None Escherichia coli None None None 16 None 12 None None None None None 20 18 None None None None None
900 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 132 None Flock Size Medium vs. large Medium Large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None 9 None 5 None None None None None 20 18 None None None None None
901 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 132 None Flock Size Medium vs. large Medium Large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Escherichia coli None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 20 18 None None None None None
902 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 132 None Flock Size Medium vs. large Medium Large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Macrolides azithromycin None Escherichia coli None None None 8 None 7 None None None None None 20 18 None None None None None
903 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 132 None Flock Size Medium vs. large Medium Large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli None None None 3 None 5 None None None None None 20 18 None None None None None
905 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 133 None Ventilation Practices Poor vs. good Good Poor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None 4 None 8 None None None None None 4 10 None None None None None
906 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 133 None Ventilation Practices Poor vs. good Good Poor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None 2 None 2 None None None None None 4 10 None None None None None
907 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 133 None Ventilation Practices Poor vs. good Good Poor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Tetracyclines doxycycline None Escherichia coli None None None 4 None 8 None None None None None 4 10 None None None None None
908 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 133 None Ventilation Practices Poor vs. good Good Poor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Carbapenems meropenem None Escherichia coli None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 4 10 None None None None None
909 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 133 None Ventilation Practices Poor vs. good Good Poor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None 3 None 7 None None None None None 4 10 None None None None None
910 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 133 None Ventilation Practices Poor vs. good Good Poor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli None None None 1 None 1 None None None None None 4 10 None None None None None
911 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 133 None Ventilation Practices Poor vs. good Good Poor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefpodoxime None Escherichia coli None None None 3 None 7 None None None None None 4 10 None None None None None
912 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 133 None Ventilation Practices Poor vs. good Good Poor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None 3 None 7 None None None None None 4 10 None None None None None
913 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 133 None Ventilation Practices Poor vs. good Good Poor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None 3 None 2 None None None None None 4 10 None None None None None
914 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 133 None Ventilation Practices Poor vs. good Good Poor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Escherichia coli None None None 0 None 1 None None None None None 4 10 None None None None None
915 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 133 None Ventilation Practices Poor vs. good Good Poor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Macrolides azithromycin None Escherichia coli None None None 3 None 3 None None None None None 4 10 None None None None None
916 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 133 None Ventilation Practices Poor vs. good Good Poor Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli None None None 1 None 2 None None None None None 4 10 None None None None None
917 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 134 None Floor disinfection practices Yes vs. no Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None 8 None 25 None None None None None 8 30 None None None None None
918 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 134 None Floor disinfection practices Yes vs. no Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Tetracyclines doxycycline None Escherichia coli None None None 7 None 23 None None None None None 8 30 None None None None None
919 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 134 None Floor disinfection practices Yes vs. no Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Carbapenems meropenem None Escherichia coli None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 8 30 None None None None None
920 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 134 None Floor disinfection practices Yes vs. no Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Sulfonamides trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None 4 None 22 None None None None None 8 30 None None None None None
921 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 134 None Floor disinfection practices Yes vs. no Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli None None None 1 None 4 None None None None None 8 30 None None None None None
922 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 134 None Floor disinfection practices Yes vs. no Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Third-generation cephalosporins cefpodoxime None Escherichia coli None None None 7 None 21 None None None None None 8 30 None None None None None
925 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 134 None Floor disinfection practices Yes vs. no Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Other antibacterials fosfomycin None Escherichia coli None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 8 30 None None None None None
923 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 134 None Floor disinfection practices Yes vs. no Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None 7 None 20 None None None None None 8 30 None None None None None
924 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 134 None Floor disinfection practices Yes vs. no Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None 5 None 9 None None None None None 8 30 None None None None None
926 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 134 None Floor disinfection practices Yes vs. no Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Macrolides azithromycin None Escherichia coli None None None 4 None 11 None None None None None 8 30 None None None None None
927 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 134 None Floor disinfection practices Yes vs. no Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Nitrofuran derivatives nitrofurantoin None Escherichia coli None None None 2 None 6 None None None None None 8 30 None None None None None
929 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 134 None Floor disinfection practices Yes vs. no Yes No Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None 3 None 4 None None None None None 8 30 None None None None None
930 None 19 None None 10.1016/j.cimid.2022.101929 ZLCEG5AG Genetic diversity and risk factor analysis of drug-resistant Escherichia coli recovered from broiler chicken farms None Observational 132 None Flock Size Medium vs. large Medium Large Chicken Broilers None None Farm Farm Contingency Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None 9 None 5 None None None None None 20 18 None None None None None
591 None 50 None None 10.3390/antibiotics9100701 X9THLGCY Antibiogram profiles and risk factors for multidrug resistance of salmonella enterica recovered from village chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus linnaeus) and other environmental sources in the central and Southern Peninsular Malaysia None Observational 107 None Production Type Free- range vs. Intensive Free Range Intensive Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Salmonella None True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 26.30 None 11.70 None 22 12 None None None None None
665 None 63 None None 10.1089/fpd.2021.0001 6XRMGZNS Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. isolates from broiler chicken meat supply chain in Maputo, Mozambique None Observational 111 None Retail Types Informal Markets vs. Supermarkets Informal markets Supermarkets Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Combinations of antibacterials penicillins, combinations with other antibacterials None Campylobacter spp. True Web Plot Digitizer None None None None None 87.10 None 87.10 None 8 8 None None None None None
931 None 89 None None 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 7WRJ4NE5 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles Among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam None Observational 83 None Retail type Market vs. SM fresh Market SM Fresh Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Quinolones ciprofloxacin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 31.00 None 21.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
932 None 89 None None 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 7WRJ4NE5 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles Among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam None Observational 83 None Retail type Market vs. SM fresh Market SM Fresh Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Penicillins amoxicillin and beta-lactamase inhibitor None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 6.00 None 6.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
933 None 89 None None 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 7WRJ4NE5 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles Among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam None Observational 83 None Retail type Market vs. SM fresh Market SM Fresh Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftiofur None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 3.00 None 6.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
934 None 89 None None 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 7WRJ4NE5 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles Among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam None Observational 83 None Retail type Market vs. SM fresh Market SM Fresh Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Third-generation cephalosporins ceftriaxone None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 3.00 None 6.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
935 None 89 None None 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 7WRJ4NE5 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles Among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam None Observational 83 None Retail type Market vs. SM fresh Market SM Fresh Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Penicillins ampicillin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 66.00 None 67.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
936 None 89 None None 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 7WRJ4NE5 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles Among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam None Observational 83 None Retail type Market vs. SM fresh Market SM Fresh Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefoxitin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 6.00 None 0.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
940 None 89 None None 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 7WRJ4NE5 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles Among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam None Observational 83 None Retail type Market vs. SM fresh Market SM Fresh Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides gentamicin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 34.00 None 18.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
939 None 89 None None 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 7WRJ4NE5 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles Among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam None Observational 83 None Retail type Market vs. SM fresh Market SM Fresh Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides kanamycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 23.00 None 22.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
938 None 89 None None 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 7WRJ4NE5 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles Among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam None Observational 83 None Retail type Market vs. SM fresh Market SM Fresh Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Aminoglycosides streptomycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 60.00 None 61.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
942 None 89 None None 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 7WRJ4NE5 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles Among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam None Observational 83 None Retail type Market vs. SM fresh Market SM Fresh Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Sulfonamides sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 63.00 None 67.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
937 None 89 None None 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 7WRJ4NE5 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles Among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam None Observational 83 None Retail type Market vs. SM fresh Market SM Fresh Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Macrolides azithromycin None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 9.00 None 12.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
941 None 89 None None 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 7WRJ4NE5 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles Among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam None Observational 83 None Retail type Market vs. SM fresh Market SM Fresh Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Amphenicols chloramphenicol None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 49.00 None 39.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
943 None 89 None None 10.1089/fpd.2018.2555 7WRJ4NE5 Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence Gene Profiles Among Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Chicken Carcasses in Vietnam None Observational 83 None Retail type Market vs. SM fresh Market SM Fresh Chicken Broilers None None Retail Retail Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 91.00 None 88.00 None 35 33 None None None None None
314 None 75 None None 10.4314/thrb.v23i1.6 HHH8SSAN Prevalence, characterization and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Salmonella isolates from healthy broiler and free-range chickens in Morogoro, Tanzania None Observational 68 None Production Type Free range vs. Broilers Free range Broilers Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Contingency Table None Second-generation cephalosporins cefaclor None Salmonella spp. None None None 0 None 0 None None None None None 3 8 None None None None None
944 None 76 None None 10.3390/antibiotics10111321 EC3IIIQV Susceptibility of commensal E. coli isolated from conventional, antibiotic-free, and organic meat chickens on farms and at slaughter toward antimicrobials with public health relevance None Observational 104 None Production type Conventional vs. ABF Antibiotic free Conventional Chicken Broilers None None Farm Abattoir Prevalence Table None Tetracyclines tetracycline None Escherichia coli None None None None None None None 81.00 None 77.00 None 33 33 None None None None None